Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NIM:18101010
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.
Frequencies
Statistics
SPEAKING
SKILL high low
N Valid 60 0 0
Missing 0 60 60
Mean 65.18
Mode 63
Variance 171.847
Skewness .153
Kurtosis -.888
Range 49
Minimum 42
Maximum 91
Sum 3911
Percentiles 25 55.00
50 63.00
75 74.00
Frequency Table
SPEAKING SKILL
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
SPEAKING SKILL
Valid
high
Frequency Percent
low
Frequency Percent
Histogram
1. There is no significant difference between ict jigsaw and ict direct instruction on student speaking skills,
because of the value of ict jigsaw is 30 and the value of ict direct instruction is 30
2. A significant difference is found in the scores of students who have high motivation and low learning
motivation. Because students who have high motivation get a score of 8.234 while those with low
motivation get a score of 6680. From these scores, it can be seen that there are significant differences in the
scores of students who have high and low learning motivation.
3. There is no interaction between teaching method and learning motivation on students' speaking skills, so
that the scores produced are different