You are on page 1of 9

coDE o.

TotalPages 48
ot to befillcd bythe Candldate
qq{ rrlr rfi rrrr qri

Time : 3 Hours MaximLrm Marks: 100

qrqWt ftiYrZ tMPoRTANT tNSTRUCT|oNS


i. 3{tGrdfi(rr d{d rri qa-RE vflSk6rdGq{RAdqacqrafd.q<ffie{rrqr:fsl
z T{,r q{-nE-srr gftior ({s 6Td + T6 {lfad) !} ir.<r 66 q{ 1t i[E reqr{ fu< {qr, lrd -rq{. ,nr. qdr, q}n{a
,r<r/tffir +{dl:rt d irq srarq r.r + vfir 1E ors<G-a ot{ S rre, qrtq \'{ srr h€ qri qr €ifrd frri
qri 6t irlfud "<{,
slEd 6r sqql.r inr srtn I tsr qrt ori qr 3aqS d qTt qfur I 3@Ffdr r(< 6i a nrttr I
3. qfi 6}{ .r_q$ ctlir +.( !_{ q{trrl irqr 6{dr t qr arl"l Ers + Fnr E+{ER 6{in I qlaar rrs-{{,i 6r{ 6rfl i
d {d Ei A qqiqdr + fa( rirtar4 *,Tr I q6 irqeni qrffifF co.lr (crlfod srirn d +oqr{) irEfrqq. lea2 t
trro qfu6 ordqrfi tq { iar.qrfr qr{ qrtrII
. crit d riqr srt{ i';rd .i6 .qrr qr-qr-vfl gk6r I if6d FA .d i I
s rrril + vfi ft{Eqrc sq * qr< ra-qt-<m glk6r n r+6 s5l d +i fti,ri *rrr c{ A fa{t. 6S dt{ rff.
sr{qr t$ vnr rFr t i6r qfuf Er{l rE ftar Briql
6. sq$ sir{ fulkr q.rE I A PddIffr6 4 qRluh { E6 Enr gturrr rfi A qr}fr r

7. tr&q qi 'raq{ + rrqr d !M I ll1sr eA 3rirfl 3iffi q t y,6 fi-rfi 6} r' sm ftfr-( ol er.r vm sS
oq?a qo { 4liri r .
B. Effi qar i arM { Ad ql!r<{ i -t{ i.dr d .ii 3rNt qcrar 61 cqrFrf qrir ort I
s. qE Tsi rl-{6-irfl gk6r 6fi i ?l!r6-EA qr i{gad A, at !ffis A16 t 6a 6r r+ an.rrll e qr fu{r !}
isrr i ar i. lr{ill ss6r qrft< 3[.d Fl E].n I
io. qfur 66 I E 4 yl6R + f&f{tr iili4 + qrq ct{r or-< r&qr alifo t r

i Write th€ r€quired particllars onlyon the ftap provided on thetop of "eu.5tion papeHum-Answ€r Aoop; and not at

2. Do not write any mark of identity inside the,,Quesrton PapeFcum-Answer sook,, (inctudint paper for rouSh work) Le.
Roll No-, Name, Addrers, Moblle No.Ielephone No., Name of God erc. or any irretevant word other than the answer
of quenion. Such act wlll be treeted as unfatr neans. tn such a ca* hir candidature shafl b€ r€iected for th€ €ntir€

3. A candldat€ found .reaiing disturbance at the ex.mination centre or mlsbehevi.S wtth tnvigltating staff or cheating
will .e.der hlm liabl€ for disqualification. He rhall allo be tiabte for p€nat :ction und€r The Rriasrhan publc
Er;mlhation(Preventionof UnfaarMeans)Act, 1992.
. The number of questions and rheirmarks are indicated in the "euenion paper,cum-Answer Book".
5 The ansrdeE of th€ quenions should srricth b€ wrttten in rhe space p.ovided betow quenion and not etsewher.,
otheruise, suEh answer shall not be ass€sred byth€ €xamaner.
6. The candidate should wrlte the answErs ln the provided space. No Supplementary Answer Book shal be provided In

7.speciryanoptionoflanguageHindiorEnStlsh,byti.kint/anboxof.MGdumotAn!r.r,onth€flap..danswerin
the same opted lantuage.
3. ln any qu€nbn,ltthere is any dlscr€pancy h Entlish & HindiveEionr the Engtish verslon is to b€ tr€ated as standa.d.
e ln cas€ th. -Questlon Piper-cum-AnsrNer BooK is
torn or not printed prop€dy, bring tt to the notice of truidtator for
change ordh€ction, at€arlien otheruis€ th€ candidares witt b€ ttabtefortnat.
to Pos*slo. of any type of electronic d4ice is rrrictly prohibited tn the EEmination Hatt.

JSLPIlT
Note: Attempt all questions. Marks of each question are mentioned
against the question.

;Jfe: q{+a qy.r} d \rfrr ffird 1 q.AE !ra{ d ft\ fuiiRd 3{o sqd sqer
3ituir firi Jd d I

Question No.1 [2 Marks]


A person, who creates resistance in execution of a decree, what
remedies are available to decree holder against such person?

I T;l qca l
q6 qtff. qt Mt d i{qr{{ d er.rthr sq"r 6.dr i. tn iqfu d fnr-r.d
Eftt{R 6} Trtr \Jq.rR ijqircr B ?

Question No.2 [2 Marks]


Explain the circumstances, in which subsequent pleading (rejoinder)
may be filed. ls there any limitation provided in law for filing subsequent
pleading?

IJ {4 {I{4IT 2
sc qRRq'ftrd o] ere of fHt cY-.arflsfl 3rR{{{ ("Tdt{_ua_sflq) y*g(
ffi or trrd t r Eqr warn+fi crF#i T;L{gd 6\qj & frE t oX cft{tqr
craqrftd d .d i?

Question No.3 [2 Marksl


Under the provisions of Specific Relief Act, 1963, what remedies are
available to a person dispossessed from the immovable property, Explain.

qt{ 1lr4ll 3

ftffie .:t1oTs ffiffqq, 1e63 d qrsqnt d.:r.r-lo. rorr+q erqfi rl i+an


fui rri .irfla o] +l]1 s[a]r irq er d, {r{E dlRri I

Question No.4 [3 Marksl


Describe the pre-requisites for filing suit against the munjcipality or
its officers under the Rajasthan Municipality Act, 2009.

qq:I qr4IT 4

]]uNq[l iw qlfd6r 3rBft{q. zoog d cr<,ict r{ qfi6r gprql glrd


3{ffit d flis'E qrE rifurd arri ig .1d star\ qFfd d1m I
Question No.5 [3 Marks]
Explain the prohibitions imposed on Civil Courts under section 305 of
the Rajasthan Municipality Act, 2009.
qYN SEIT 5
{-s{enn {rrq qfaqr 3ftrFqq, 20os dl elRI 305 d 3ld'ld ftfua qrqrad qr
sftrilft-d r${reit o1 *c€ o1fu} t

Question No.6 [3 Marks] tr


ldentify the kind of following easement:

a. A right of way annexed to "A's house over "B's land.

b. A right annexed to "A's house to prevent "B" from building on his


own land.

c. A right annexed to "B's house to receive light by the windows without


obstructions by his neighbor "A".
q{jl {iEfl 6

ffifuo SsrsR d ron +t rorgi,


3r. B ol .1ft w n d I'6 € fia.r rrrlfuox
q. B ol rw+l "fiwMq6G*rHd fit A drlt+
ria'l vo sIE6R t

n. cs]-S A dnr qEn sre ffir R{cfiili € rorcl crF od ot B d


i
fd sd.c 1.6 3{D+r{ t
Question No.7 [3 Marks]

Hindu male "A", to enter into marriage with a Hindu female "B" on
1,0.03.2017. "C", a christian lady, files a suit for permanent injunction to
restrain "A" from said marriage, on the ground that "A" had already
married with "C" on 22.08.201,6 in a temple as per the Hindu rituals. As she
is a legally wedded so "A" has no right to marry again.

Whether, "C" is entitled to get injunction? Give answer applying


relevant provisions of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

IIt{ {-gII 7

[6 trS.55s "A". s.F ifq qRdr "B" d Rrr{ flcio to.og.zolz d ftqro 6{i
srcrr tI "c" w fu qtrdr. "A" ol vffi ftsre 6{i ir to'i i1 rvr4i liitrm or
qr< Fs 3rrfl{ w rqo orff t f} "A" $ { A H6 zzog.zoto -.nJ qk{ { trq
{lFrr ffi d "c" d {{rpl fa-qe or g6I t t qfu, as d'q ffiin t, 3ld, "A" 4l gr,
fuar6 6{i sr 3rk6R Tdt t I

?r{r "C" qrisr sitl qi1 3rffifi t ? l-q ftdr6 erBf,+qq. rsss d t{i.ld
vrflr+t o) rgffi lrti E{ -';.R fff}rd I

question No.8 [4 Marksl

What is "Privileged Communication" under lndian Evidence Act?


Describe its kinds, in brief.

JS LI' I ]7
T$r $qr 8

qr..ftq FEq 3lF]ftqq d fl<,fu 1imqrr sw;r!., qfld r6ni


Eqr d? oT
trdq i- sah fimr

Question No.g Marksl


ta
fl
Section 45 and 73 of lndian Evidence Act are complementary to
each
other. Discuss
tl {.t ltqll I
qrftftq r{re{ 3rBfirrq }1 qnr 45 oi}{ 73
+1fis
\16 {si ol -rq.6 d r iiAfir
r

Question No.10 [4 Marks]


Distinguish "lnvalid Decree" and ,,Void Decree,,. Whether a void
decree can be challenged in collateral proceedings, explain.

s{{ qqT 10

,3r*r
ffi.. 3ik "q-q M" d ltifta a1ffi r rqr T6 qq M 6)
*iqRtro orffit n g+fi ff Br s{fi i. wtr o1M t

Question No.11 [4 Marks]


"A" filed a criminal Complaint against ,.B,, for robbery. ,,A" and,,B,,
enter in to an agreement whereby, ,,A,, agrees to withdraw the prosecution
on "B's promise to give value of the stolen property.

ls this agreement enforceable? Answer with reasons.


!I{EI t[t.qr 11

"A" I "8" d f+sa qc orR-o or-i 61 3 qrrEo cR-4rE rqd fu-+ I ,,4. .1L
"8" V6 BrJqq 6{A d ftrs,i "A", "8, d {{r sri c{ fo re srr+1 eIff g{ sqRT
ot X"o t t n. gffiwq oi qFr*l di ol srro erdr i r

c{r q6 3rjErr r{ffiq t? or{ot {{Fd rris flfid t

Question No.12 [+ Marks]f-l


After retirement of a partner, a partnership firm took loan from bank
and failed to repay it. The bank filcd recovery suit wherein the retired
partner was also impleaded as one of the defendants. The bank stated, that
retirement of the partner was not disclosed to the bank and impression
was given that he continues to be a partner.

The defence of the retire partner was that since, he had retired,
could not be made liable and there was no basis for the bank to presume
that he continued to be a partner. He did not sign any document when loan
was advanced to the firm.
light of
Whether the retired partner would be liable? Decide in the
the provisions of the lndian Partnership Act
q{{ drql 12

g6 qFftER Edgo m'fl-<n d rffi


i sTqi d wq! d-6 t-zq fuqr
sis az.r 61 goH ;i wrra rff r io i trrdfr iE qrq Erqq f}qr fui srq
cffirq"r d i* t",i+C" "{Fi'ER of 'fi rjdlkd ftqr L d'o i qc irdr fu' '{Fft{R
or npq i6 d rrqer !r+z 'rS fuqrrqr s s q6
qdlqT rIqT to cs st"t
d lffi
.i i
.{Fi-{R I

ffi{fl q-Fft 6I ii?Ir4 qs rn fu tifu. rrd qE-.r d.gal ur ero'qrrS


<tf rd fi; sr lrom B eiq d=o d qm qt squrfi'r or:l or +t{ entrn +fiqqirts
l?'

* *,n* d sq n ord< rn .n{ 6) zq r<rc +ri 6 rrqq s$i 4t{ ff


L
" 6i{rerRd +fi ftd ri I

trqr, sm t fi{fl .Tr'fter sr$ d'n? ql{dlq 'Tr'ffii sIBFqq d qrnll{i d


rorgr t f+Fia olM I

question No.13 [4 Marksl

Distinguish the forms of marriage "BATIL" and "FASID" under


Muslim

Law

gp:T lir{l 13

Sfkr ftft) d n<,f ir fiqra d $ , "'llfild' eils "'ht1tr<" oit f?'']f-o o'1ffi t

question No.14 [4 Marks]

A woman, during her live-in-relationship with a man, subjected to


of
Domestic Violence. Can such woman get remedy under the Protection
Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005?

Answer with support ofjudgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court'

s{q {i@I 1a

qt( Esr
vo qG-.n. rai fixlt Srsv d nrq eqff fYE-Y{-ffirl{Rrq S *$r'
d oric rA i' r c.n iri ;ft-. +.d Ew d qFarct or ti{erot i}{Ef'rqq' zoos d
erf,,id sqER qrq 6{ {od'l i ?
qlrffq qd-".l qrqrdrq d Frliq rj qr+rQkr rci ql r.rt flfi 1

euestion No.15 [4 Marksl

Define the followings under Rajasthan Stamps Act:

a. Leave and Licence

b. Sea PolicY

qrq grsrll 15

sM{erFl 5 6 sfqliq'r d orofo, ll'qfifuo o) cforTfrd slf}it'

]I SnIln(l ]l ( Jl_lsllL.l

JSlPrlT PaQe4oru
q irldlq qili{i
Question No.l6 [4 Marksl
The plaintiff, on 15.07.2015 instituted a suit for recovery of money
for price of goods sold to the defendant. lt was pleaded that the goods
were sold vide invoice dated 15.04.2012. The defendant had given a
cheque on 06.05.2015 for the invoice amount. The said cheque was
returned unpaid by bank on 13.05.2015.

The defendant filed written statement and raised prelimrnary


objection that the suit is barred by Limjtation. The Court framed
preliminary issue of Law that "As to whether the suit is barred by
Limitation"

Decide the issue wjth support of relevant law

u{{ lJr.,r.IT 't6

srdl cft4rff al ti
Td qrd d 1.u o1 *Br o1 T{dt .Fr al< feil$ 15.07.
20is oJ ircr fuqr t rd GrFtqan ldqT rrsr i6 s.Fr qrd qftr) fia ii,ti6 rs.ol.zorz o)
ial ,rfl en I cfuflA fia +1 rrfir 6r +.F
i ffi6
oo.os.zors ol fiqr gntEfii +fi
o) do am fi+io r:.os.zors 6) fuir Trdrr fi,d dler ftqrr
i
ftfud 6ei;t wld fi,qr sflq yrtftro 3TrqR' sdd ft srE qftSqr d
cft4r4l
sftk tr .irqrdq i fiD or qrEfrlo Ftrdrr.t; 116 liqfre ftor fu .,trqr srs cR-Sqr d
qfttu e" I

gti.ld ftIfu * qqEld 6{i Ec sn ftql{.6 iiFld rffftri I

Question No.17 [4 Marksl


The application of the plaintiff under Order XXXIX rule 1 and 2 of the
CPC, was rejected by the trial court on 10.01.2017. The plaintiff preferred
an appeal against the order. However, the appeal was dismissed as
withdrawn. The plaintiff, thereafter, applied to the trial court to review the
rejection order dated 10.01.2017.

The defendant raised a preliminary objection that since, the appeal


has been dismissed as withdrawn, hence, the review application ls not
maintainable.

Decide the preliminary objection

q a.r tIsIT 17

enid-r q* er<tdo eirir xxxtx l.rqq r q z Rrlda qfrqr riltor o]


srff d
fiq{"r qrqrmq Rl{r fi{i.b 10.0r.2017 oJ q1}r"F oq ft-qr rrqr t gq 3n?yr d E5<
srff ERr 3lqd rqa ol .r$. d fu qiqrEft-d r{i d wr+a-sq srRo ol rr{ r Bqrd
qrqa qrff i fu.,'R"t qqrdq il. ftqio ro.or.zorz d TFiqt stIr o) gr.ffiftd
ori ig 3rifi ftqr r
i
qfrlqra cNtirdr 3nqfi rdr{ 16. qfu 3dtd. kqrdftd s{i d rorqw
rsfts ai qr X+t t. srd, g<Effior +r 16 cria< r: r$i t ffiq t

sm qRtrro nrcft ol frFi-d offit


Question No.18 [4 Marks]

A suit for eviction was filed by plaintiff along with all original
documents against defendant on 10.01.2010. The defendant filed written
statement on 12.0L.20L2 along with original lease deed dated 10.01.1986,
issued by competent authority in favor of his grandfather. lssues were
framed on 10.08.2014 and plaintiff concluded his evidence on 01.01.2016.
During his evidence on 1O.07.)077, the defendant exhibited the original
lease deed. At the time of final argument, the defendant requested to draw
presumption under section 90 of Evidence Act, with regard to original lease
deed. Per contra, the plaintiff argued that since, on the dates of, filing of
suit, filing of written statement and framing of issues, the document was
not 30 years old, therefore, such presumption cannot be drawn under
section 90.

Express your opinion with reason upon the arguments of both the
parties.

c{{ q-@I 18

qrff erqr qftmr,.l d F6€ iffi 61 4" ft{r6 10.0i.2010 q;l flI rrrr{{ Td
<lf,rnq d rqd fdqr I vftlqr..l i ffi-.r rz.ot.zotz El lafuo oerc qq sefi
qrEror€t al{r s<rd <rqr d va i or$
1a cder lks fi-<ifu-o roor rggo tyr fuqr I

ftrio ro.oa.zor+ 6l ftdrilo ffin fir$.rd oqr qrff i elqff rfleq fffi6 or.or.zoro
o) sqre ai I cF qrff i f{qrtn ro.or.zorz o} slcfr Hres ti tY*r.l Xa q.deT ftr+q 6l
rsfii-d ftqI t ra{{ eiRq d rrqq !ffi i aa trea ffiq d Eri t trm so Tflns
3{Bftqq d s,'. .fa a,ftnEqr fut rrr.} or triE'r fS-q arrd fui{id, qrfi i .rd i?qr
fu <m rrgo oG o1 er ftfuo oerc rqa ori o1 qr fiqrro ffi{d 6{i o1.
filqqt ro qg <sriq ao s{ * grrff sr<& 6r rfi qr. Jir: err{T go d a.<.lo tS
sqerT{qT Tfi d sn rrrff I t

g-*rq qer d fl+J q{ or"r vFo w.Tr rc ar4al +iftr} t

Question No.19 [4 Marks]

on what basis, court fees shall be computed and payable in cases of


suits for specific performance of contract under the provision of the
Rajasthan Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1961? Explain.

U:.1 {l tsr{l 1S

{rs€IFl ;qEITEr{I ga delr 4R T@Irq 3lfuftqq, 1961 d trrsqlq d 3rflrid


ffi{r d EF'tre craq d qrrd d qrci i qromq go f}o erun w {rrFrd fu-qr
srrs Stq e).n ? rqq o1M t
Question No,20 [6 Marks]
Doctrine of Part performance, provided in section 53-A of Transfer of
Property Act, is a right as well as defence. Discuss.

q{i tl{4lt 20

d qRT 53-A i
{{qfr srd{sr sfftftqq sFld 3riRr6 crdr 6r fudrir, 3IEI6|{
d qrq-srrr {qrq ?i e I i4ifuo ffiri r

Question No.21 [6 Marks]


StatinB "TALAK" three times, is a valid form of Divorce under Muslim
Law? Discuss in the light of recentjudgment of Hon'ble Apex Court.

q{.I {ircll 21

rfic ql1 " dr6 a,-ett. tiqr 5ftira fiE d 3t{,fd ftl-cre fd$< 6r V6 iir sc
tr qrrffq \taTdq qrqrdq d Tfi-{dq trq d ronr t f+ifue o1ffi t

Question No.22 [6 Marksl

Do you think that the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, has
removed the gender discrepancy and Hindu female have equal rights to
ProPerty. Discuss.

'J
c.r *i{arr 22

4.rr 3rrrr qr.id t fu tra sfl{rBfiR f{iyirF) s{dfiqq. zoos i lii.r t< 6l
qqrq 6{ frqr d sitt 6q qR"N qeft t qqrq orfufin rsff i t ftff'.ra +1fu r

Question No.23 [6 Marks]

ln which lands, Khatedari rights shall not accrue under Rajasthan


Tenancy Act, explain.

qFI {'qIT 23

n-lRQrFi sTrtrsrt 3rfiftqq d 3r.iFtf, ftfi Tft's d srffi 3rE6R dr{If,


rS ift E"f-q 61ffi r

Question No.24
Write a reasoned judgment on the following facts:
[10 Marks]
I
Pleadings of the Suit

Plaintiff and defendant are familiar to each other. On 77.O7.2014, tot


the sake of personal necessity, the defendant borrowed Rs. 187690/ from
the plaintiff and agreed to return the money after one year with 20%
annual rate of interest and accordingly a written agreement was executed.
After stipulated period, despite demand, defendant did not return the
principal amount and interest thereon. Plaintiff sought decree for Rs.
256115/- along with suit expenses and interest till realization of the
amount.

Pleading of the Written Statement

The defendant categorically denied the pleadlngs in the plaint and


also denied the execution of agreement. The defendant pleaded that the
alleged borrowed amount is in odd figure. Ordinarily amount is not
borrowed in odd figure. This fact itself makes claim highly doubtful. tt is
also pleaded that the defendant constructed the plaintiff's house and
payment of which is still due towards the plaintiff. The plaintiff does not
want to pay the due amount, therefore, he has filed false case against him.
He prayed to dismiss the suit with heavy costs.

q9.l {l{.,{l 24

ftirliltqt rrql qr !4, rrd{iqd Fpfrr ftM,


arc d orFttr d-r

qrfl q cMl
c6 {gt d qRfud tr fu{i6 rz.oz.zora +J cffi Erff ri
3Ic-S arfu.r,r orrqqrroororl tq 1.s7,6s0l- sqi slrl{ +dr i sitr R-dffi 6}dr i ft
{6 irft {1}r 1.6 E{ q!"K 20% qrFf6 aqrq et t ata ?.nr <rq1<rn fl vo fifuo
rg{ar ffif, fr-qFrqr t crfrFf, erqB d qrqra. qit qri o' gqcl,d .i cfrrsrff i
na *"r silr qrq ol qrlt cff4rff 6l Tfi iHt 3id n. Eqn 2.56,115/- qq {4
qq T{ 3iftq oqff rro tqru ft-dd qd ig srq ffi m .,ri or :Ifais sr6r
'|qr
tt
fufua o{r + qfu{rrr
cffi i {.rE w € d Grftq?it t a6n fuqr i g{ 3r$rar iiqqn r)
er<
ti EdFR ftul i r qfiqfl i rs srM*d fu'qr i fu sfir ier dd r( rftr taqq
rd ;i t, mqrqo fdsq 3r6i t rilr sqR {8 dl "rrdl i. qc oul rqdq I rri ai
m{ tidTrcrd a-+ tar t t rd fi cffid fuqr rrqr i fu cffi .i qrfi r} Tor{ o
Frql"r fuqr er lil+or rlr6s 3l1i T6 ara d fis< comr t t qro .Tm +orqr r{il
o) srq r$ 6{.tT qr€crT i srfl 6R"r sqi qe frpm qrE ssd Ew< trqd FF-qr i I

c{Adra iir{ qr< d qdl Ed {{Fd srR-q uri or fiirc fsfl Tqr

JSLPIIT

You might also like