Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TotalPages 48
ot to befillcd bythe Candldate
qq{ rrlr rfi rrrr qri
7. tr&q qi 'raq{ + rrqr d !M I ll1sr eA 3rirfl 3iffi q t y,6 fi-rfi 6} r' sm ftfr-( ol er.r vm sS
oq?a qo { 4liri r .
B. Effi qar i arM { Ad ql!r<{ i -t{ i.dr d .ii 3rNt qcrar 61 cqrFrf qrir ort I
s. qE Tsi rl-{6-irfl gk6r 6fi i ?l!r6-EA qr i{gad A, at !ffis A16 t 6a 6r r+ an.rrll e qr fu{r !}
isrr i ar i. lr{ill ss6r qrft< 3[.d Fl E].n I
io. qfur 66 I E 4 yl6R + f&f{tr iili4 + qrq ct{r or-< r&qr alifo t r
i Write th€ r€quired particllars onlyon the ftap provided on thetop of "eu.5tion papeHum-Answ€r Aoop; and not at
2. Do not write any mark of identity inside the,,Quesrton PapeFcum-Answer sook,, (inctudint paper for rouSh work) Le.
Roll No-, Name, Addrers, Moblle No.Ielephone No., Name of God erc. or any irretevant word other than the answer
of quenion. Such act wlll be treeted as unfatr neans. tn such a ca* hir candidature shafl b€ r€iected for th€ €ntir€
3. A candldat€ found .reaiing disturbance at the ex.mination centre or mlsbehevi.S wtth tnvigltating staff or cheating
will .e.der hlm liabl€ for disqualification. He rhall allo be tiabte for p€nat :ction und€r The Rriasrhan publc
Er;mlhation(Preventionof UnfaarMeans)Act, 1992.
. The number of questions and rheirmarks are indicated in the "euenion paper,cum-Answer Book".
5 The ansrdeE of th€ quenions should srricth b€ wrttten in rhe space p.ovided betow quenion and not etsewher.,
otheruise, suEh answer shall not be ass€sred byth€ €xamaner.
6. The candidate should wrlte the answErs ln the provided space. No Supplementary Answer Book shal be provided In
7.speciryanoptionoflanguageHindiorEnStlsh,byti.kint/anboxof.MGdumotAn!r.r,onth€flap..danswerin
the same opted lantuage.
3. ln any qu€nbn,ltthere is any dlscr€pancy h Entlish & HindiveEionr the Engtish verslon is to b€ tr€ated as standa.d.
e ln cas€ th. -Questlon Piper-cum-AnsrNer BooK is
torn or not printed prop€dy, bring tt to the notice of truidtator for
change ordh€ction, at€arlien otheruis€ th€ candidares witt b€ ttabtefortnat.
to Pos*slo. of any type of electronic d4ice is rrrictly prohibited tn the EEmination Hatt.
JSLPIlT
Note: Attempt all questions. Marks of each question are mentioned
against the question.
;Jfe: q{+a qy.r} d \rfrr ffird 1 q.AE !ra{ d ft\ fuiiRd 3{o sqd sqer
3ituir firi Jd d I
I T;l qca l
q6 qtff. qt Mt d i{qr{{ d er.rthr sq"r 6.dr i. tn iqfu d fnr-r.d
Eftt{R 6} Trtr \Jq.rR ijqircr B ?
IJ {4 {I{4IT 2
sc qRRq'ftrd o] ere of fHt cY-.arflsfl 3rR{{{ ("Tdt{_ua_sflq) y*g(
ffi or trrd t r Eqr warn+fi crF#i T;L{gd 6\qj & frE t oX cft{tqr
craqrftd d .d i?
qt{ 1lr4ll 3
qq:I qr4IT 4
Hindu male "A", to enter into marriage with a Hindu female "B" on
1,0.03.2017. "C", a christian lady, files a suit for permanent injunction to
restrain "A" from said marriage, on the ground that "A" had already
married with "C" on 22.08.201,6 in a temple as per the Hindu rituals. As she
is a legally wedded so "A" has no right to marry again.
IIt{ {-gII 7
[6 trS.55s "A". s.F ifq qRdr "B" d Rrr{ flcio to.og.zolz d ftqro 6{i
srcrr tI "c" w fu qtrdr. "A" ol vffi ftsre 6{i ir to'i i1 rvr4i liitrm or
qr< Fs 3rrfl{ w rqo orff t f} "A" $ { A H6 zzog.zoto -.nJ qk{ { trq
{lFrr ffi d "c" d {{rpl fa-qe or g6I t t qfu, as d'q ffiin t, 3ld, "A" 4l gr,
fuar6 6{i sr 3rk6R Tdt t I
?r{r "C" qrisr sitl qi1 3rffifi t ? l-q ftdr6 erBf,+qq. rsss d t{i.ld
vrflr+t o) rgffi lrti E{ -';.R fff}rd I
JS LI' I ]7
T$r $qr 8
s{{ qqT 10
,3r*r
ffi.. 3ik "q-q M" d ltifta a1ffi r rqr T6 qq M 6)
*iqRtro orffit n g+fi ff Br s{fi i. wtr o1M t
"A" I "8" d f+sa qc orR-o or-i 61 3 qrrEo cR-4rE rqd fu-+ I ,,4. .1L
"8" V6 BrJqq 6{A d ftrs,i "A", "8, d {{r sri c{ fo re srr+1 eIff g{ sqRT
ot X"o t t n. gffiwq oi qFr*l di ol srro erdr i r
The defence of the retire partner was that since, he had retired,
could not be made liable and there was no basis for the bank to presume
that he continued to be a partner. He did not sign any document when loan
was advanced to the firm.
light of
Whether the retired partner would be liable? Decide in the
the provisions of the lndian Partnership Act
q{{ drql 12
Law
gp:T lir{l 13
Sfkr ftft) d n<,f ir fiqra d $ , "'llfild' eils "'ht1tr<" oit f?'']f-o o'1ffi t
s{q {i@I 1a
qt( Esr
vo qG-.n. rai fixlt Srsv d nrq eqff fYE-Y{-ffirl{Rrq S *$r'
d oric rA i' r c.n iri ;ft-. +.d Ew d qFarct or ti{erot i}{Ef'rqq' zoos d
erf,,id sqER qrq 6{ {od'l i ?
qlrffq qd-".l qrqrdrq d Frliq rj qr+rQkr rci ql r.rt flfi 1
b. Sea PolicY
qrq grsrll 15
]I SnIln(l ]l ( Jl_lsllL.l
JSlPrlT PaQe4oru
q irldlq qili{i
Question No.l6 [4 Marksl
The plaintiff, on 15.07.2015 instituted a suit for recovery of money
for price of goods sold to the defendant. lt was pleaded that the goods
were sold vide invoice dated 15.04.2012. The defendant had given a
cheque on 06.05.2015 for the invoice amount. The said cheque was
returned unpaid by bank on 13.05.2015.
srdl cft4rff al ti
Td qrd d 1.u o1 *Br o1 T{dt .Fr al< feil$ 15.07.
20is oJ ircr fuqr t rd GrFtqan ldqT rrsr i6 s.Fr qrd qftr) fia ii,ti6 rs.ol.zorz o)
ial ,rfl en I cfuflA fia +1 rrfir 6r +.F
i ffi6
oo.os.zors ol fiqr gntEfii +fi
o) do am fi+io r:.os.zors 6) fuir Trdrr fi,d dler ftqrr
i
ftfud 6ei;t wld fi,qr sflq yrtftro 3TrqR' sdd ft srE qftSqr d
cft4r4l
sftk tr .irqrdq i fiD or qrEfrlo Ftrdrr.t; 116 liqfre ftor fu .,trqr srs cR-Sqr d
qfttu e" I
q a.r tIsIT 17
A suit for eviction was filed by plaintiff along with all original
documents against defendant on 10.01.2010. The defendant filed written
statement on 12.0L.20L2 along with original lease deed dated 10.01.1986,
issued by competent authority in favor of his grandfather. lssues were
framed on 10.08.2014 and plaintiff concluded his evidence on 01.01.2016.
During his evidence on 1O.07.)077, the defendant exhibited the original
lease deed. At the time of final argument, the defendant requested to draw
presumption under section 90 of Evidence Act, with regard to original lease
deed. Per contra, the plaintiff argued that since, on the dates of, filing of
suit, filing of written statement and framing of issues, the document was
not 30 years old, therefore, such presumption cannot be drawn under
section 90.
Express your opinion with reason upon the arguments of both the
parties.
c{{ q-@I 18
qrff erqr qftmr,.l d F6€ iffi 61 4" ft{r6 10.0i.2010 q;l flI rrrr{{ Td
<lf,rnq d rqd fdqr I vftlqr..l i ffi-.r rz.ot.zotz El lafuo oerc qq sefi
qrEror€t al{r s<rd <rqr d va i or$
1a cder lks fi-<ifu-o roor rggo tyr fuqr I
ftrio ro.oa.zor+ 6l ftdrilo ffin fir$.rd oqr qrff i elqff rfleq fffi6 or.or.zoro
o) sqre ai I cF qrff i f{qrtn ro.or.zorz o} slcfr Hres ti tY*r.l Xa q.deT ftr+q 6l
rsfii-d ftqI t ra{{ eiRq d rrqq !ffi i aa trea ffiq d Eri t trm so Tflns
3{Bftqq d s,'. .fa a,ftnEqr fut rrr.} or triE'r fS-q arrd fui{id, qrfi i .rd i?qr
fu <m rrgo oG o1 er ftfuo oerc rqa ori o1 qr fiqrro ffi{d 6{i o1.
filqqt ro qg <sriq ao s{ * grrff sr<& 6r rfi qr. Jir: err{T go d a.<.lo tS
sqerT{qT Tfi d sn rrrff I t
U:.1 {l tsr{l 1S
q{i tl{4lt 20
d qRT 53-A i
{{qfr srd{sr sfftftqq sFld 3riRr6 crdr 6r fudrir, 3IEI6|{
d qrq-srrr {qrq ?i e I i4ifuo ffiri r
q{.I {ircll 21
rfic ql1 " dr6 a,-ett. tiqr 5ftira fiE d 3t{,fd ftl-cre fd$< 6r V6 iir sc
tr qrrffq \taTdq qrqrdq d Tfi-{dq trq d ronr t f+ifue o1ffi t
Do you think that the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, has
removed the gender discrepancy and Hindu female have equal rights to
ProPerty. Discuss.
'J
c.r *i{arr 22
4.rr 3rrrr qr.id t fu tra sfl{rBfiR f{iyirF) s{dfiqq. zoos i lii.r t< 6l
qqrq 6{ frqr d sitt 6q qR"N qeft t qqrq orfufin rsff i t ftff'.ra +1fu r
qFI {'qIT 23
Question No.24
Write a reasoned judgment on the following facts:
[10 Marks]
I
Pleadings of the Suit
q9.l {l{.,{l 24
qrfl q cMl
c6 {gt d qRfud tr fu{i6 rz.oz.zora +J cffi Erff ri
3Ic-S arfu.r,r orrqqrroororl tq 1.s7,6s0l- sqi slrl{ +dr i sitr R-dffi 6}dr i ft
{6 irft {1}r 1.6 E{ q!"K 20% qrFf6 aqrq et t ata ?.nr <rq1<rn fl vo fifuo
rg{ar ffif, fr-qFrqr t crfrFf, erqB d qrqra. qit qri o' gqcl,d .i cfrrsrff i
na *"r silr qrq ol qrlt cff4rff 6l Tfi iHt 3id n. Eqn 2.56,115/- qq {4
qq T{ 3iftq oqff rro tqru ft-dd qd ig srq ffi m .,ri or :Ifais sr6r
'|qr
tt
fufua o{r + qfu{rrr
cffi i {.rE w € d Grftq?it t a6n fuqr i g{ 3r$rar iiqqn r)
er<
ti EdFR ftul i r qfiqfl i rs srM*d fu'qr i fu sfir ier dd r( rftr taqq
rd ;i t, mqrqo fdsq 3r6i t rilr sqR {8 dl "rrdl i. qc oul rqdq I rri ai
m{ tidTrcrd a-+ tar t t rd fi cffid fuqr rrqr i fu cffi .i qrfi r} Tor{ o
Frql"r fuqr er lil+or rlr6s 3l1i T6 ara d fis< comr t t qro .Tm +orqr r{il
o) srq r$ 6{.tT qr€crT i srfl 6R"r sqi qe frpm qrE ssd Ew< trqd FF-qr i I
c{Adra iir{ qr< d qdl Ed {{Fd srR-q uri or fiirc fsfl Tqr
JSLPIIT