Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID
During the mid-1980’s DNA analysis was first recognized as having application to
forensic science by the British molecular biologist Alex Jeffreys. From work in his laboratory, as
well as from others, it was realized that DNA at a vast number of sites was unique between
individuals.
DNA has been utilized as a new powerful tool for human identification. It offers the
following advantages.
DNA IS STABLE – it can be isolated from material that is months or even years old.
DNA can be destroyed from wide variety of biological resources like blood, semen, hair,
saliva, and bones.
DNA can be replicated in the laboratory – from a very small amount of initial material
through the process of PCR ( POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION).
DNA shows greater variability from one individual to the next.
WHAT IS DNA?
DNA is functionally the hereditary material that contains the genetic information
necessary for duplication of cells and for the production of proteins. Chemically, it is an acid,
is phosphorous rich, it contains a deoxyribose sugar, it contains the four (4) bases adenine
(A), THYMINE (T), CYTOSINE (C), and GUANINE (G), and that the bases shows the unique
property of pair wise equivalency. It is a double helix composed of two complimentary
strands.
Human tissues such as hair, blood, semen are often left in places where a crime has
been committed. By carefully collecting such bits of tissues, their owner can be identified from
the DNA pattern obtained. Semen in rape victims, hairs in kidnapper’s lairs, bloodstains in
clothing associated with murder, saliva stains in cigarette butts, stamps envelopes associated
with extortion have all been used to help identify criminals.
In addition, there are reports indicating that DNA has been isolated from urine samples
with nucleated cells; however, it is extremely rare to be able to obtain sufficient DNA to type
from urine samples. Other types of biological evidence, such as tears, perspiration, serum and
other body fluids without nucleated cells are not amenable to DNA analysis. It should be kept in
mind that not all biological materials listed above in case work submitted to a forensic
laboratory are in such a state that DNA can be successfully extracted and analyzed.
Ability to perform successful DNA analysis on biological evidence recovered from a crime
scene depends very much on the following and some are critical points for a forensic DNA
testing program.
1. what kinds of specimens were collected and how they were preserved.
2. The technique used to collect and document such evidence
3. The quantity and type of evidence that should be packaged, and
4. How the evidence should be preserved.
Unless the evidence is properly documented, collected, packaged and preserved, it will
not meet the legal and scientific requirements for admissibility into a court of law. If the DNA
evidence is not properly documented prior to collection, its origin can be questioned. If it is
improperly packaged, cross – examination may occur. And if the DNA evidence is not properly
preserved, decomposition and deterioration may well occur. Any of these effects will seriously
affect the outcome of DNA typing. The following are general guidelines for the documentation,
collection and packaging and preservation of DNA evidence.
The initial stages in physical evidence examination encompass activities that take place
at a crime scene as well as forensic laboratory. Documentation is important from two points of
view in forensic science: the legal one, and the scientific one. Nothing should ever be altered
until its original condition and positions have been recorded. Several different means of
documentation are available. Generally, the uses of more than one method are recommended.
Every major piece of evidence should be documented.
DNA ANALYSIS
There are many types of DNA testing that are presently available.
DNA TYPING is done by first carefully extracting the DNA from the evidentiary samples.
The DNA is then analyzed to give a particular pattern. The patterns are compared with that of
known individual to determine a match. In individual identification, the pattern obtained from
the evidentiary sample definitely has not originated from the suspect. If the DNA pattern of the
evidentiary sample is similar to that of sample obtained from the suspect, the probability that
the evidentiary sample arose from the suspect and from a random individual in the population is
calculated from a formula based on well accepted concepts of statistical probabilities and
population genetics using an established population genetic database.
Probability calculations must show that no other person in the country or in the world
could possess such DNA pattern except the suspect. For example, the probability of a matched
DNA pattern being present in the Philippines indicates how many people are expected to
possess such pattern. If probability of pattern is 1 per 20, 000, this means that there could be
as many 3, 600 (72 million/20, 000) people having that pattern. Therefore, the DNA test is
inconclusive. However, if DNA pattern has probability of 1 to 100 million, since there are only 72
million people in the Philippines, then the forensic sample must have come from the suspect.