Physical Education Curriculum Reform in Finland

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/271204773
Physical Education Curriculum Reform in Finland
Article in Quest -Illinois- National Association for Physical Education in Higher Education- · October 2014
DOI: 10.1080/00336297.2014.948688
CITATIONS READS
55 10,760
1 author:
Sami Yli-Piipari
University of Georgia
77 PUBLICATIONS 985 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Weight Status Influences Effectiveness of Need-Supportive Physical Activity Summer Camp in Girls View project
Examination of need-supportive instruction View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Sami Yli-Piipari on 22 January 2015.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Quest
Fo
Physical Education Curriculum Reform in Finland
r
Journal: Quest
Pe
Manuscript ID: Draft
Manuscript Type: Article
Keywords: physical education

er
Re
vi
ew
Human Kinetics, 1607 N Market St, Champaign, IL 61825

Page 1 of 35 Quest
2 Physical Education Curriculum Reform in Finland
3 SAMI R. YLI-PIIPARI
4 Abstract
5 The Finnish education system has received worldwide attention due to the top academic
6 performance of Finnish school students. Physical education, as an integral part of the Finnish
7 education curriculum, potentially contributes to the overall success. The purpose of this article is
Fo
8 to summarize Finnish physical education reform during the past decades and review and critique
9 recent literature that has examined the effectiveness of Finnish physical education programs.
r
10 This review concludes that physical education has a solid foundation in Finnish schools and it
Pe
11 enjoys strong support in Finnish society. Although physical education contact time has
er
12 diminished across four decades, the current basic education reform has begun to allocate more
13 time and funding for elementary and middle school physical education. The literature review,
Re
14 however, revealed limited evidence on the effectiveness of physical education programs. In the
15 future, robust studies are needed to provide evidence of the effectiveness of physical education.
vi
16 It is likely, that with rigorous research evidence, the current efforts to allocate more time for
ew
17 physical education should be more easily justified and supported.
18 Keywords Curriculum reform, review study, elementary and middle schools
19 Health and Sport Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, 38152 Tennessee.

20 Address correspondence to Sami Yli-Piipari, Doctor of Sport Pedagogy, Health and Sport
21 Sciences, University of Memphis, 210 Fieldhouse, Memphis, TN 38152. E-mail:
22 srylppri@memphis.edu
23
24
25
26
27
1
Quest Page 2 of 35
28 Introduction
29 Recently, the Finnish educational system has been attracting positive attention and global
30 interest. This is largely due to the fact that in the Programme of International Student Assessment
31 (PISA), a worldwide study of the scholastic performance of 15-year-old students in reading,
32 science, and mathematics of the last decade, the Finnish educational system has topped the
33 charts, while the U.S. educational system has been middling, at best. Finnish students’
34 performances have ranked at or near the top in all three competencies in every PISA survey since
Fo
35 2000, neck-and-neck with super-achieving students from South Korea, Singapore, and more
36 recently, Shanghai, China. (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD],
r
37 2010a; 2010b). Finland's success is especially intriguing because compared to the stereotype of
Pe
38 the East Asian model of long hours of cramming and rote memorization, Finnish schools have
er
39 shorter school days, assign less homework and more recess, and engage children in more creative
40 play (Sahlberg, 2011).

Re
41 Physical education (PE) has been an institution in Finnish schools since the mid-19th
42 century and has been a mandated subject content across Finnish basic education. In general, PE
vi
43 is a phase of education that aims to contribute to an individual’s development of physical,

ew
44 cognitive, and psychosocial competencies. A quality PE program provides children and
45 adolescents with weekly physical activity (PA), knowledge base, skills, and motivation to
46 participate in a variety of PAs as an ongoing part of a healthy lifestyle. As a mandated content
47 area (Basic Education Act 628, 1998), PE is the only structured opportunity to ensure that all
48 children can engage in moderate-to-vigorous PA. As an integral part of the Finnish basic
49 education system, it is believed that PE has contributed to the successful education of young
50 people (Huisman, 2004). This article examines the hypothesis that school PE enhances students’
2
Page 3 of 35 Quest
51 cognitive, social, and psychomotor development and, therefore, provides important benefits.
52 Thus, the aim of this article is twofold: (a) to summarize school-based PE curriculum reform
53 during the past four decades in Finland and (b) to review recent literature to determine the
54 effectiveness of the current Finnish PE programs.
55 A Short History of Educational Reform in Finland
56 Finland, a member of the European Union, has been going through a fundamental
57 educational transformation during the past four decades, converting from a poor agrarian society
Fo
58 with limited education to one of the most highly educated countries in the world (Routti & Ylä-
59 Anttila, 2006). Finland is a rather young nation as it established its independence from the Soviet
r
60 Union in 1917 (OECD, 2010b). During World War II, the sovereignty of the nation was
Pe
61 threatened and Finland fought hard to preserve its independence (OECD, 2010b). The postwar
er
62 education system was unequal and more reflective of the needs of a rural, agricultural society
63 than of an industrial society. Only about a quarter of young Finns in 1950 had access to the
Re
64 grammar school path, and two-thirds of the grammar schools were privately governed. Most
65 young Finns left school after six years of basic education, with only those living in towns or
vi
66 larger municipalities having access to a middle school education (OECD, 2010b). During the
ew
67 postwar era, urbanization together with a need for quality education initiated the movement that
68 slowly led to new basic education legislation in 1968. The transition from a scattered school
69 organization to the single top-down comprehensive school system was challenging and,
70 consequently, the transition slow and careful (OECD, 2010b). The implementation of the Basic
71 School Curriculum Framework began in 1972 in northern Finland and in five years it moved
72 gradually to the more populated municipalities in the south. The implementation of the new
73 education system was not easy and it was accompanied with a very substantial debate about core
3
Quest Page 4 of 35
74 values and beliefs (OECD, 2010b). All along, the educational policy objective has been focused
75 on equity; today it is supported by a homogeneous cultural and social agreement (Finnish
76 society, in general, supports the educational policies and the current schooling system). All
77 schools are assigned to a municipal education system similar to school districts in the U.S. in an
78 effort to form an efficient delivery system of quality education. For instance, local municipalities
79 cover all students’ costs for their basic education, including books, supplies, meals, and even
80 medical and dental checkups (Sahlberg, 2011).

Fo
81 The responsible institution behind the national core curriculum is the National Board of
82 Education of Finland, which is a part of the Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture. The
r
83 National Board of Education of Finland coordinates the continuous curriculum revision process
Pe
84 moderated by different stakeholders, such as scholars, teachers, and administrators (Brown

er
85 Ruzzi, 2005). The Finnish basic curriculum has been revised regularly with the revision process
86 being active and continuous (OECD, 2010b). A curriculum revision in 1970 aimed to provide
Re
87 equal opportunity to all Finnish children (OECD, 2010b). The second revision in 1985
88 highlighted teachers’ professionalism and local municipalities’ autonomy to implement a

vi
89 curriculum that reinforces the strengths of the schools (OECD, 2010). In addition, the 1985
ew
90 curriculum revision engaged local teachers in the curriculum planning process. The Framework
91 of Curriculum in 1994 provided guidelines for curriculum development, stating that the mission
92 of each school was to be local and school-based. Evaluation guidelines were reformed in 1999,
93 and nationwide objectives of basic education and lesson time allocations were mandated in 2001
94 (e.g., mandating physical and health education to be two separate subjects) (OECD, 2010b). The
95 current content and lesson time allocations are from the latest curriculum revision that was
96 completed in 2004 (OECD, 2010b).
4
Page 5 of 35 Quest
97 Due to the recent success in PISA, the Finnish education system has received worldwide
98 attention. This interest has generated research efforts that attempt to identify and summarize the
99 educational policy factors that may have led to flattering results in an international achievement-
100 based testing. Sahlberg (2011) has highlighted the following five central factors from the
101 findings that contributed to the academic achievements of Finnish school students: (a) a six-year
102 quality elementary school experience as a cornerstone for education; (b) requirement for a
103 masters’ degree qualification for all basic school teachers (including PE teachers); (c) well-
Fo
104 equipped public schools with small class sizes (elementary schools traditionally have fewer than
105 300 pupils per school and average elementary classes sizes are 19 students [OECD, 2012] - ); (d)
r
106 small, tight-knit professional communities with teachers’ willingness to engage in professional
Pe
107 development; and (e) almost all children are enrolled in identical public schools regardless of
er
108 their families’ economic status (less than 4% of Finnish students are enrolled in mostly religion-
109 based, private comprehensive schools).

Re
110 The Finnish educational system is in many respects similar to systems in most other
111 European countries and in the U.S. In Finland, children start their compulsory comprehensive
vi
112 school in the year they reach seven years of age (on average, one year later than children in most
ew
113 of the states in the U.S) (Basic Education Act 628, 1998). A comprehensive school divides into a
114 lower level (elementary school grades 1–6) and an upper level (middle school grades 7–9). Up to
115 the age of 15 years (grade 9), all Finnish adolescents receive similar basic education (Basic
116 Education Act 628, 1998). In Finnish elementary schools, children study different school
117 subjects with their homeroom teacher, whereas in middle school subject-specific classes with
118 specialist teachers are widely used. After completing nine years in compulsory basic education,
119 students can continue their education in either a high school or vocational school, both of which
5
Quest Page 6 of 35
120 are noncompulsory, tuition-free institutions. High school, with its intensive college preparatory
121 courses, is the most direct route to university. In contract vocational school, with its lower or
122 higher diploma, prepares students to enter directly into working life. Lower level vocational
123 studies take 2–5 years, high schools studies 3–4 years, and higher level vocational studies 3–5
124 years (OECD, 2010b).
125 A Short History of Physical Education in Finland
126 Throughout these changes, PE has been, and continues to be a compulsory part of the
Fo
127 national school curriculum in Finland. Developments at the core national curriculum reflect the
128 changes in the PE curriculum as well. School PE is available for essentially all Finnish
r
129 elementary and middle school students, with more than 99% of students successfully completing
Pe
130 compulsory basic education (Official Statistics of Finland, 2012). In addition, it is noted that
er
131 every student enrolled in Finnish high schools is participating in weekly PE, whereas in the U.S.
132 only 52% of high school students attend weekly PE (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
Re
133 2011).
134 In Finnish comprehensive education, PE, art, music, and crafts together form a cross-
vi
135 curricular theme that aims to educate a holistic individual, to prepare students to learn, and to
ew
136 provide necessary enrichment and PA for individual growth. Finland has experienced a similar
137 transformation in school-based PE as other Western countries (Bailey et al., 2009). In 1843,
138 during the time when Finland was an autonomous grand duchy of Russia, for the first time,
139 school PE was included as a part of school curriculum (Heikinaro-Johansson & Telama, 2005).
140 School PE had an objective to prevent the looming decay of the physical fitness of the nations’
141 youth (Ilmanen, 1982). Soon after declaring independence from Russia in 1917, sovereign
142 Finland added a military objective to the school PE curriculum. This period of time lasted almost
6
Page 7 of 35 Quest
143 three decades, until slowly vanishing after World War II (Meinander, 1992). The post-war
144 transformation from an agrarian society to an urban society further improved the role of school
145 PE toward the enhancement of fitness and health, along with the prevention of sedentary habits
146 (Heikinaro-Johansson & Telama, 2005). Following a national revision processes from the 1970s
147 to the 21st century delineated PE objectives to support the knowledge, skills, and attitudes that
148 facilitate a physically active lifestyle, working ability, health, and cooperation (Finnish National
149 Board of Education, 1985). In addition, revisions were made in 1994 to support the enjoyment
Fo
150 and positive experiences of PE, enhancement of self-esteem, and healthy lifestyles (Finnish
151 National Board of Education, 1994). To reinforce general health-related objectives, health
r
152 education was integrated with PE in the 1994 basic curriculum revision process. Currently, based
Pe
153 on the last curriculum revision in 2004, school PE has become content that is expected, through a
er
154 balanced and coherent range of physical activities, to contribute to the optimal development of
155 an individual’s potential including growth and development in physical and psychosocial
Re
156 competencies (Finnish National Board of Education, 2004).
157 The Current State of Physical Education in Finland

vi
158 Aims and Objectives

ew
159 Finnish PE has a general, lifelong educational objective to promote students’ physical,
160 psychological, social, and ethical growth and well-being, and to guide them toward lifelong PA
161 (Finnish National Board of Education, 2004, 2007). Specifically, school PE aims to enhance
162 students’ competency in motor skills and movement patterns, promote a physically active life-
163 style and physical fitness, promote responsible personal and social behavior, promote appropriate
164 values, and promote enjoyment of, and self-expression in, PA. At the basic education level
165 (grades 1–9), the main emphasis is on learning a wide variety of motor skills. In high school
7
Quest Page 8 of 35
166 (grades 10–12), the curriculum emphasizes adopting a healthy and physically active lifestyle and
167 acquiring an understanding of how PA positively affects students’ physical, psychological, and
168 social well-being (Finnish National Board of Education, 2003). In vocational schools, the main
169 goal of PE is for students to promote their own healthy and active lifestyles by planning and
170 implementing their own personal PA programs (Finnish National Board of Education, 2001).
171 It is noticeable that the Finnish national curriculum leaves content decisions on activity
172 selections and delivery to individual teachers and schools. In general, Finnish schools have not
Fo
173 followed the global accountability movement, such as test-based accountability, that assumes
174 that making schools and teachers more accountable for their performances is the key to
r
175 improving student learning (Sahlberg, 2011). As a consequence of decentralized education

Pe
176 management and increased school autonomy, local education authorities and political leaders are
er
177 held accountable for their policy decisions (Sahlberg, 2011). This has promoted a reciprocal
178 accountability system where schools are increasingly accountable for learning outcomes and
Re
179 education authorities are expected to support schools to achieve expected outcomes. In Finland,
180 the general perception is that flexible accountability has had a major positive impact on teaching
vi
181 and, hence, on student learning. Assessment of student learning is based on teacher-made tests,
ew
182 rather than external standardized tests. This is evident also in PE. It is not unusual for PE
183 teachers to view, for instance, fitness-tests as opportunities for learning rather than assessing
184 student achievement.
185 Single-Gender Middle School Physical Education
186 In Finland, schools have the option to organize PE in either coeducation or single-gender
187 groups. In elementary school, grades 1–4, girls and boys typically participate in coeducational
188 PE, whereas in grades 5–9, single-gender classes are the norm. In addition, single-gender classes
8
Page 9 of 35 Quest
189 are normally organized so that male teachers teach boys and female teachers teach girls (Berg &
190 Lahelma, 2010). Although the national curriculum states the same PE objectives for girls and
191 boys, 5th–9th grade curricula note that “PE instruction must make allowances for the differing
192 needs of boys and girls at this stage of development, as well as the pupils’ differentials in growth
193 and development generally” (Finnish National Board of Education, 2004, p. 18).
194 Content
195 The Finnish national core curriculum in PE is rather short on content. It comprises
Fo
196 running and throwing activities in different forms; gymnastics with and without equipment and
197 apparatuses; music, expression, and dance; ball games; orienteering; winter sports; and
r
198 swimming and lifesaving skills. In addition, the curriculum includes some content that supports
Pe
199 operational capacity and muscle fitness (Finnish National Board of Education, 2004). The
er
200 Finnish PE curriculum has been found to be similar to that in other Western countries; however,
201 the main variation concerns the inclusion of activities representative of Nordic culture, such as
Re
202 skiing, skating, orienteering, swimming, and outdoor education (Annerstedt, 2008).
203 Compulsory PE is typically organized around multi-activity programs in a series of units

vi
204 (Heikinaro-Johansson & Telama, 2005). This practice follows rather well the objectives of the
ew
205 core curriculum. Results from Palomäki and Heikinaro-Johansson (2011) revealed the
206 dominance of popular ball games, such as floor ball, Finnish baseball, basketball, and soccer.
207 Previous studies documented statistically significant gender variation in the content of PE
208 programs (Huisman, 2004; Palomäki & Heikinaro-Johansson, 2011). Girls are typically taught
209 more aerobics, gymnastics, fitness training (circuit training), dance, and music activities (e.g.
210 skating, track and field, orienteering, and relaxing techniques) than boys. In addition, boys’
9
Quest Page 10 of 35
211 program include more soccer, floor ball, tennis/racket ball/table tennis, ultimate frisbee, hand
212 ball, skiing, and ice-related games, such as ice hockey, than girls.
213 Time Allocation
214 Time allocation for PE has fallen markedly in Finland in recent years (Heikinaro-
215 Johansson & Telama, 2005). Presently, comprehensive school students have two 45-minute
216 classes of obligatory PE weekly. Elementary school programs may add a third PE lesson to their
217 curriculum. At the middle school level, an individual student has a possibility to add more PE
Fo
218 units (a unit is 38 hours) from a set of elective units that are developed according to local school
219 curriculum (Basic Education Act 628, 1998). Throughout middle school, boys and girls complete
r
220 PE classes in gender-separate groups. Furthermore, high school education includes two
Pe
221 compulsory PE units that involve a total of 76 hours of student participation. Students may also
er
222 decide to complete a maximum of three additional elective units within their three academic
223 years of upper secondary school. In vocational school, students have one compulsory unit (i.e.,
Re
224 27 hours of participation—3 weekly hours across 9 weeks) and can complete a maximum of four
225 elective units in PE over a three-year period (Finnish National Board of Education, 2001).
vi
226 Assessment and Evaluation

ew
227 Student assessment in comprehensive schools is intended to promote student learning,
228 allow teachers to evaluate how well students have met the objectives for growth and learning,
229 and help students to form a realistic image of their learning and development in the future
230 (Finnish National Board of Education, 2004). Teachers are given a wide range of responsibility
231 for student learning and assessment, as well as flexibility in exercising that responsibility. In
232 comprehensive schools, each student’s progress is reported at the end of a school year. The
233 report covers the student’s conduct, schoolwork, knowledge and skills in different subject areas.
10
Page 11 of 35 Quest
234 In the first seven years, the assessment report can be either a written description of the student’s
235 progress or a numerical grade (Finnish National Board of Education, 2007). After grade seven,
236 the report must include a grade that is accompanied by written comments. To increase equity
237 across schools, the Finnish National Board of Education (2004) has mandated competence
238 standards for every content area. It is expected that students should be able to master the content
239 and score an 8 (an appropriate competence level) on the assessments at the end of the school
240 year. The assessments in PE focus on various sport skills, motivation, social skills, and
Fo
241 knowledge and behavior of fair play. In addition, a student should understand the relationships
242 between PA and health (Finnish National Board of Education, 2004). Previously it has been
r
243 reported that the average PE grade received (9th grade) in 2003 was 8.2 for boys and 8.3 for girls
Pe
244 and in 2011, 8.3 for both girls and boys. In 2003, 83% of girls and 78% of boys achieved the PE
er
245 objectives in excellent, very good, or good standings. In 2010, the percentages were 82% for girls
246 and 81% for boys (Huisman, 2004; Palomäki & Heikinaro-Johansson, 2011).
Re
247 Schools and local authorities are required by legislation to be reviewed by external
248 evaluators to review the quality of education provided to children. In addition to the local
vi
249 evaluation, a national-level evaluation is also in place, set by the Educational Evaluation Council
ew
250 (Basic Education Act 628, 1998). The council’s role is to evaluate the national education system
251 by gathering and analyzing information useful in supporting students’ learning and teachers’
252 work, but is not focused on rating the performance of different schools (OECD, 2010b; Simola,
253 Rinne, Varjo, Pitkänen, & Kauko, 2009). The council advocates transparency and accountability
254 in its activities and publishes its findings on evaluations without schools being identified or
255 ranked in the reports. It would be up to individual schools and education providers to decide how
11
Quest Page 12 of 35
256 to publicize their respective evaluation results (for a comprehensive description of the Finnish
257 evaluation policies, see Simola et al., 2009).
258 Review of Evidence on Effectiveness of Finnish Physical Education Programs
259 When trying to understand any educational system, one needs to recognize the objectives
260 of educational policy first, and then analyze scientific evidence on whether these objectives are
261 being met. What follows is an attempt to analyze and evaluate available research evidence in
262 relation to meeting the cognitive, social, and psychomotor objectives of the Finnish school PE
Fo
263 curriculum. Specifically, features of Finnish PE students’ dispositions, such as attitudes and
264 motivation toward PE and social-emotional skills in PE, were evaluated. In addition, the research
r
265 findings in students’ total daily PA, fitness levels, and motor skills were also reviewed (Note 1).
Pe
266 Student Attitudes and Motivation

er
267 Research has shown adolescents’ attitudes toward school PE to be positive in Finnish
268 comprehensive schools (Heikinaro-Johansson, Varstala, & Lyyra, 2008; Huisman, 2004;
Re
269 Nupponen, & Telama, 1998; Palomäki & Heikinaro-Johansson, 2011; Varstala, Telama, &
270 Heikinaro-Johansson, 1987). Varstala et al. (1987) reported that 88% of Finnish students liked
vi
271 PE. In addition, it was found that elementary school students liked PE more than middle school
ew
272 students (Nupponen, & Telama, 1998). More recent evidence is available from the Finnish
273 National Board of Education, in its reports of PE learning performance evaluation studies in
274 2003 and 2010. The studies were conducted with nationally representative samples (111 schools
275 and 5,446 adolescents [Huisman, 2004]; 51 schools and 1,616 adolescents [Palomäki &
276 Heikinaro-Johansson, 2011]) and evaluated the attitudes of 15-year-old Finnish adolescents
277 when students were in their final year in a comprehensive school. The studies reported that in
278 2003, 44% of girls and 27% of boys had a very good or good attitude toward PE, while in 2010,
12
Page 13 of 35 Quest
279 45% of girls and 25% of boys had positive attitudes toward PE (Huisman, 2004; Palomäki &
280 Heikinaro-Johansson, 2011). But in 2003, 47% of the girls and 56% of the boys did not have a
281 positive or negative attitude toward PE, whereas in 2010 50% of the girls and 59% of boys have
282 a neutral opinion about school PE. Finally, in 2003, a small percentage of girls (7%) and boys
283 (17%) had a negative or very negative attitude toward PE; in 2010, the percentage rates were 8%
284 for girls and 16% for boys. Interestingly, 47% of girls and 59% of boys (2003) and 49% of girls
285 and 69% of boys (2010) indicated that they would like to have at least one more obligatory PE
Fo
286 class each week (Huisman, 2004; Palomäki & Heikinaro-Johansson, 2011).
287 Several studies have examined motivation-related variables in Finnish school PE

r
288 (Hagger, Chatzisarantis, Culverhouse, & Biddle, 2003; Jaakkola, 2002; Soini, 2006; Yli-Piipari,
Pe
289 Jaakkola, & Liukkonen, 2010; Yli-Piipari, Leskinen, Jaakkola, & Liukkonen, 2012). Soini
er
290 (2006) showed that Finnish 9th grade students (n = 4,397) enjoyed PE, with enjoyment for boys
291 in PE being statistically higher than girls. More recently, a longitudinal study by Yli-Piipari,
Re
292 Barkoukis, Jaakkola, and Liukkonen (2013) showed that PE enjoyment for adolescents (n = 812)
293 declined across middle school years (7th grade = 3.76; 8th = grade 3.66; 9th = grade 3.52; scale
vi
294 range from 1 to 5. In addition, based on the same longitudinal data, adolescents who had high
ew
295 values toward school PE were able to hold these values steady during the middle school years
296 (scale ranging from 1 to 5; 7th grade = 4.23; 8th = grade 4.13; 9th = grade 4.14; (Yli-Piipari et
297 al., 2010). However, no cross-cultural data are available to compare Finnish adolescents’ PE
298 enjoyment and values with the dispositions of students from the other cultures.
299 Evolving from the self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985), a study examined high
300 school students’ (n = 909) perception of PE teacher’s autonomy-support and perception of their
301 own autonomy in PE across four nations, namely Great Britain, Estonia, Finland, and Hungary
13
Quest Page 14 of 35
302 (Hagger et al., 2009). The study showed that Finnish students reported higher perceptions of both
303 teacher autonomy-support and their own autonomy than did students in other three countries. In
304 addition, Soini (2006) showed boys in 9th grade perceive their autonomy in PE to be higher than
305 girls.
306 Social-Emotional Learning
307 Facilitating social growth and development of an individual is an important objective of
308 Finnish PE. In Finnish PE teacher education, skills that nurture students’ positive socio-
Fo
309 emotional growth are highly regarded as tools for effective teaching and self-reflection. Only one
310 study has examined the implementation of a socio-emotional skill program in teaching middle
r
311 school students (Kuusela, 2005). In her study, Kuusela (2005) designed and tested a PE unit to
Pe
312 increase 8th grade girls’ social and emotional skills across 50 contact lessons integrated in
er
313 regular PE lessons. The teacher used active listening, ‟I” messages, and ecosystemic methods to
314 interact with the students and the problem situations (Gordon, 1974). Results showed the unit to
Re
315 be effective in practice and applicable as part of a PE program as students felt motivated to
316 practice the skills and regarded them as useful and practical. In addition, a majority of the
vi
317 students enjoyed the course and felt that their social and emotional skills had improved during
ew
318 the unit.
319 Physical Activity of School-Aged Youth
320 Finland has a long history in examining children’s and adolescents’ PA. However, no
321 studies examining in-class PA during PE classes, utilizing the aforementioned search strategy
322 (see Note 1), have been published. Although numerous cross-sectional population and
323 longitudinal studies have provided this evidence using self-report methods, to date there are no
324 population studies utilizing objective measures, such as accelerometers or pedometers (Ministry
14
Page 15 of 35 Quest
325 of Education and Culture, 2010). Nevertheless, self-report studies have shown Finnish students
326 to be more active than those in other Western nations. Since 1982, the World Health
327 Organization has been collecting collaborative cross-national data on health behaviors of 11-to-
328 15-year-old children and adolescents. The Health Behavior in School-aged Children (HBSC)
329 study comprising 41 nations across Europe and North America reported that Finnish 11 year olds
330 are more physically active than the U.S. 11 year olds, but PA engagement have been shown to be
331 opposite in 15 year olds (Currie et al., 2008). Boys have been found to be more physically active
Fo
332 than girls in both Finland and the U.S. Furthermore, research has reported that only 23% of 15-
333 to-16-year-old Finnish boys and 10% of 15-to-16-year-old Finnish girls met the national
r
334 guidelines of 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA per day (Tammelin, Ekelund, Remes, &
Pe
335 Näyhä, 2007). Results from the HBSC study are presented in Table 1.
er
336 Table 1 goes here
337 Although numerous studies have documented that PA participation declines during
Re
338 adolescence (for a review, see Dumith, Gigante, Domingues, & Kohl, 2011), studies in Finland
339 have shown conflicting results (Huisman, 2004; Laakso, Telama, Nupponen, Rimpelä, & Pere,
vi
340 2008; Nupponen, Laakso, Rimpelä, Pere, & Telama, 2010; Palomäki & Heikinaro-Johansson,
ew
341 2011; Yli-Piipari et al., 2012). As a part of a nation-level longitudinal research program, the
342 Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns study (Telama, Yang, Laakso, & Viikari, 1997) examined
343 9-, 12-, 15-, and 18-year-old children and adolescents in 1980 (n = 2,309). Follow-up data were
344 collected in 1983, 1986, and 1989. Thus, the data documented activity patterns of the participants
345 from 9 to 27 years of age. PA was measured by means of a short questionnaire that included
346 items on the frequency and intensity of leisure-time PA, participation in sport club training,
347 participation in sport competitions, and the respondents’ habitual ways of spending their leisure-
15
Quest Page 16 of 35
348 time. A sum index of PA was computed with these five variables (Telama et al., 1997). The
349 results showed a remarkable decline after the age of 12 in the frequency of PA and sport
350 participation, in particular.
351 More recently, studies examining self-report PA have showed Finnish 15-year-old
352 adolescents to be more active in 2010 compared to 2003 (Huisman 2004; Palomäki & Heikinaro-
353 Johansson, 2011). The studies reported a 6% and a 10% increase in girls’ participation (very
354 physically active four or more times per week) in organized and non-organized sports,
Fo
355 respectively. For boys, there was only 10% increase in the non-organized sport activity.
356 The findings of the comprehensive Finnish Adolescent Health and Lifestyle Survey
r
357 utilizing the nationwide sample showed that 12-to-18-year-old adolescents’ participation rates in
Pe
358 MVPA increased during the study period from 1979 to 2005 (Nupponen et al., 2010). The
er
359 increase was not continuous, but showed an upward trend during the years 2001–2005. Drawn
360 from the same data set, Laakso et al. (2008) reported that out-of-school PA for Finnish youth
Re
361 increased from 1991 to 2007. Adolescents who participated in unorganized PA at least once a
362 week for boys 43% in 1991 and 48% in 2007 among boys, and 29% in 1991 and 42% in 2007
vi
363 among girls.

ew
364 In a recent study, Yli-Piipari et al. (2012) followed 12 year olds (n = 812) for 3 years
365 during their transition from elementary to middle school in Finland. PA was assessed by using
366 the HBSC PA scale measuring weekly frequency of 60 minutes of daily MVPA engagement.
367 The study supported the findings of the of the HBSC study showing that MVPA participation is
368 inversely related to age. In addition, the study extended previous findings showing that MVPA
369 declined across grades 6–9 with the steepest decline occurring during the transition from grade 6
370 to 7.
16
Page 17 of 35 Quest
371 Fitness of School-Aged Youth
372 Several studies have been reported examining fitness levels of Finnish children and
373 adolescents (Huotari, Nupponen, Laakso, & Kujala, 2010a, 2010b; Laakso, Nupposen, &
374 Telaman, 1997; Nupponen, 1979; Nupponen, 1981). Some earlier studies have shown physical
375 fitness of Finnish youth to be at an acceptable level (Laakso et al., 1997). More recently, Huotari
376 et al. (2010a, 2010b), utilizing the earlier work of Nupponen (1979, 1981), investigated two
377 stratified samples across 1976 and 2001, and reported interesting findings on secular trends of
Fo
378 Finnish youth. The 1976 sample comprised 2,796 adolescents (9–21 years old) and the sample
379 from 2001 comprised 1,041 adolescents (11–18 years old). The same set of fitness tests were
r
380 conducted in both studies (25 years apart), which consisted of a standing long jump (cm), 30
Pe
381 second sit-ups, and a 4-x-10-meter agility shuttle run. In addition, aerobic fitness performance
er
382 was measured in running tests, 2,000-meter for boys and 1,500-meter for girls, and upper body
383 muscular fitness in was tested using the flexed arm hang for girls and pull-ups for boys. The
Re
384 study showed that both boys and girls had lower aerobic fitness performance in 2001 than their
385 counterparts in the 1976 sample. The increase in long-distance running time from 1976 to 2001
vi
386 was 10% for boys and 6% for girls. In addition, the study showed that 13-to-16-year-old
ew
387 adolescents had slightly higher muscular fitness performance in 2001 compared to 1976. The
388 results showed a positive trend in the agility shuttle run and sit-up tests in both boys and girls. In
389 contrast, among boys, upper body strength was lower, while in the standing broad jump there
390 was no change in performance over time for boys, and only a slight positive trend for girls.
391 Motor Skills of School-Aged Youth
392 Nupponen, Soini, and Telma (1999) created the Finnish Fitness Test Package, which is
393 based on the Eurofit (1988) battery, and is administered once or twice a year in elementary and
17
Quest Page 18 of 35
394 middle school PE. In addition, Nupponen et al. created a norm-based assessment criterion for
395 Finnish school-aged youth to test aerobic and muscular fitness, flexibility, and motor skills. Also
396 included is the coordination test of Haag and Haag (2001). Utilizing the Finnish Fitness Test
397 Packages, the 2003 and 2010 PE learning performance evaluations examined the change in
398 adolescents’ aerobic and muscular fitness, flexibility, and motor skills (Huisman, 2004; Palomäki
399 & Heikinaro-Johansson, 2011). The results showed a significant statistical decrease in
400 coordination track and slight improvements in the results of a dribbling skill test for girls.
Fo
401 Palomäki and Heikinaro-Johansson (2011) summarized the findings, stating that the most
402 worrying sign was that decreases in motor skill performance continued over time.
r
403 In 2007, a one-year intervention project was implemented to study relationships between
Pe
404 middle-school students’ fundamental movement skills, self-report PA, and motivation toward PE
er
405 (Kalaja, 2012). The study comprised 446 Finnish grade 7 students. The intervention design was
406 quasi-experimental, including experimental (n = 199 students) and control (n = 247 students)
Re
407 groups, assessed across four measurement points (baseline through retention). The intervention
408 aimed to increase adolescents’ fundamental motor skills by implementing a 25-minute training
vi
409 session in the beginning of the weekly PE lesson (one to two times per week). The program,
ew
410 designed by the researcher and the PE teachers, focused on developing one dimension of
411 fundamental motor skills at a time. Fundamental movement skills were measured by a test
412 package consisting of static and dynamic balance, leaping, shuttle running, rope-jumping,
413 accuracy throwing and dribbling. After the intervention, there were statistically significant
414 differences between the experimental and control groups in static and dynamic balance. The
415 experimental group showed more statistically significant development across four measurement
416 points in these variables compared to the control group on the balancing skills but nonsignificant
18
Page 19 of 35 Quest
417 differences for locomotor and manipulative skills. Interestingly, during the intervention, the
418 experimental group’s decrease in self-report PA was more moderate than the decrease of control
419 group (time and experimental condition interaction.
420 Evidence Summary
421 The reviewed findings indicate that the evidence of the effectiveness of Finnish PE
422 programs on students’ cognitive, social, and psychomotor development is scarce. Whereas
423 numerous research efforts have been conducted and reported on PA, motor skills, and fitness,
Fo
424 studies specifically examining the role of school or PE in children’s and adolescents’
425 physiological outcomes have been sparse. In addition, there are no studies examining the explicit
r
426 relationships between school PE and student social-cognitive outcomes.

Pe
427 It can, however, be stated that school PE is well regarded among Finnish elementary and
er
428 middle school students. This evidence has been established across several studies and across a
429 long period of time (Heikinaro-Johansson et al., 2008; Huisman, 2004; Palomäki & Heikinaro-
Re
430 Johansson, 2011; Varstala et al., 1987). In addition, some evidence (generated by only one study)
431 indicated that compared to some other European PE programs Finnish adolescents tend to
vi
432 perceive their PE classes as more autonomy-supportive (Hagger et al., 2009). Similarly, the
ew
433 reviewed evidence on the impact of Finnish PE on adolescents’ psychomotor development is
434 scant. In fact, there are no studies that directly examine the effects of school PE, such as different
435 curricula, instructional models, teaching styles in school students’ PA, fitness, or motor skills.
436 The lack of evidence, together with so many other factors (not related to school PE programs)
437 that influence individuals’ PA and fitness levels, makes it impossible to determine whether
438 school PE contributes to a nation’s health. It is interesting that most of the reviewed studies
439 showed that adolescents’ PA in Finland declined at a faster rate than in other Western countries
19
Quest Page 20 of 35
440 (HBSC study; Currie et al., 2008). However, there are no research findings to evaluate whether
441 increased PE time has or could have tempered the naturally declining PA levels. Similarly,
442 although the reviewed evidence indicates that Finnish adolescents’ aerobic fitness has declined
443 and muscular fitness has slightly increased from 1991 to 2001, the role of school PE in this
444 development is yet to be determined. In addition, it is naïve to expect that two to three weekly PE
445 lessons could contribute significantly to students’ PA or fitness. However, skills, knowledge, and
446 attitudes learned in PE could potentially act as a springboard for adolescents’ involvement in
Fo
447 sport and physical activities throughout life. The central finding of this review is that there is a
448 great need to determine the best possible PE to facilitate students’ growth. The final section of
r
449 this article provides specific suggestions for future research endeavors in PE not only pertaining
Pe
450 to Finland, but to the U.S. as well.

er
451 Twenty-First Century Physical Education
452 Toward 2020: Physical Education Curriculum in Finland

Re
453 In 2009, an expert group was formed to develop Finnish basic education and to
454 strengthen its objectives in a consistent way by taking into consideration the present strengths of
vi
455 basic education and the development needs for the future (Ministry of Education and Culture,
ew
456 2010). This group, Basic Education 2020, formulated a proposal for the distribution of lesson
457 hours and the general national objectives for the new basic education reform, completed by 2016
458 (Ministry of Education and Culture, 2010). The proposal emphasizes vital citizen skills for the
459 21st century that have been classified into five groups: thinking skills, ways of working and
460 interaction, crafts and expressive skills, participation and initiative, and self-awareness and
461 personal responsibility. In June 2012, the Finnish Minister of Education signed a decree to
462 reform basic education to include educational objectives, lesson-hour distribution, a National
20
Page 21 of 35 Quest
463 Core Curriculum, and local curricula to be completed by the beginning of school year 2016
464 (Basic Education Decree 422, 2012). As a starting point, the decree allocated more time and
465 funding for PE, arts, craft education, and civic/citizenship education (Basic Education Decree
466 422, 2012). The preparation of the curricula is interactive. All education providers can follow the
467 preparation and give feedback at the different phases. They are also encouraged to involve
468 students and their parents in the process (Basic Education Decree 422, 2012). Based on this
469 Basic Education Decree, schools should aim to increase students’ support and cooperation with
Fo
470 homes and to increase student autonomy to enhance motivation and individual growth to meet
471 the new objectives (Basic Education Decree 422, 2012). In addition, teaching and learning
r
472 should facilitate students’ health and well-being.

Pe
473 From a PE teacher’s point of view, these changes are promising, although inadequate.
er
474 The new Basic Education Decree 422 increases PE time by adding an annual weekly lesson for
475 two years during grades 1-9. It is yet to be confirmed how this one additional PE lesson per
Re
476 week for elementary and middle school levels will be used, but the rationale for the increase is to
477 improve the health and wellbeing of children and adolescents. Therefore, it is likely that
vi
478 increased resources will be used for health-enhancing PE.

ew
479 In addition, together with the new National Core Curriculum, schools and physical
480 educators are required to implement a new criterion-referenced MOVE!® assessment and
481 feedback program to evaluate students’ fitness levels and to motivate students to participate in
482 health-enhancing PA. This program will be integrated in Finnish 5th- and 8th-grade curricula, as
483 well as in yearly school health monitoring; it also generates fitness assessment data to inform
484 students, parents, and health administrators alike. The fitness tests of MOVE! ® bear similarities
485 with FITNESSGRAM® tests evaluating students’ aerobic capacity, body composition, and
21
Quest Page 22 of 35
486 muscular strength, endurance, and flexibility. This assessment and feedback program will be
487 implemented across the Finnish comprehensive school system and it is attainable for more than
488 96% of a Finnish student cohort. It is yet to be seen or tested if this new system will enhance the
489 health, PA, and motivation of youth, and whether it will facilitate communicating fitness testing
490 results to students, parents, and health administrators. This new program can be seen as an
491 indicator that the role of schooling system is not only to educate the mind of a student, but also to
492 provide tools and motivation to engage health-enhancing PA.

Fo
493 Over the past decades, physical educators have witnessed marginalization of PE across
494 the Western world (Hardman & Marshall, 2009; Pühse, & Gerber, 2005). Considering the
r
495 challenges and outright threats to school PE in many countries, the changes pertaining to the
Pe
496 Finnish national curriculum are promising. Although negative prophecies of the future of PE
er
497 have been presented (Kirk, 2010), the future of Finnish school PE is viewed by the author in a
498 more positive light. Based on recent developments, it can be argued that PE has a solid
Re
499 foundation in Finnish schools enjoying considerable support in Finnish society. This is not
500 because educational policies in Finland are more PE-friendly than U.S. policies, for instance, but
vi
501 because since the 1970s one of the most central purposes of schooling has been the holistic
ew
502 development of a student (Aho, Pitkänen, & Sahlberg, 2006). Thus, school PE is not important
503 because it is just a tool to “let off steam,” but because it is an important piece in an academic
504 education system that helps the nation to achieve the objectives of the 21st century.
505 Future Research
506 School PE has an important educational mission to educate the whole individual. This
507 literature review, however, shows limited evidence of the effectiveness of the Finnish PE
508 programs in relation to examined outcomes. Although a respectable amount of evidence in PA
22
Page 23 of 35 Quest
509 participation and fitness levels of Finnish youth has been reported, the findings of this review
510 indicates that the effects of PE on health and fitness outcomes are not well understood (e.g., Pate,
511 O'Neill, & McIver, 2011). In fact, based on this review, it is argues that no credible evidence
512 directly linking school PE (policies, curricula, teaching styles, or strategies) and cognitive,
513 social, and psychomotor student outcomes is currently available. Thus, there is a clear need for
514 scholars to conduct robust research to better examine the effectiveness of school PE. Studies
515 should assess teaching practices and curricula to identify disparities in PE quality and quantity,
Fo
516 and document favorable and unfavorable trends. In addition, studies that employ a strong
517 theoretical framework and a rigorous research design would be beneficial to address these issues.
r
518 Research in this area should seek four goals.

Pe
519 Goal 1. It is logical to assume that allocating more time to PE across all grade levels
er
520 helps students to reach the daily PA recommendations. Daily PE in elementary and middle
521 schools is needed for fitness-enhancing benefits for all students, including those who are the
Re
522 most inactive. However, financial resources for education and PE are limited; therefore, studies
523 to determine the most beneficial, health-enhancing, weekly dose of PE is needed. This
vi
524 suggestion is by no means new or novel, or only pertinent to Finnish PE. Previously, several
ew
525 distinguished U.S. scholars recommended that school PE should focus on enhancing population
526 health (e.g., Sallis et al., 2012). It is likely, that the current efforts to allocate more time for PE
527 should be more readily appreciated by the different stakeholders when supported by rigorous
528 scientific evidence. Thus, strengthening research on this topic will be productive in terms of
529 promoting and supporting PE-friendly school policies in Finland.
530 Goal 2. The findings of this review indicate that Finnish students are highly motivated
531 toward PE. What we do not know is how PE curriculum relates to this motivation and to
23
Quest Page 24 of 35
532 participation of adolescents in out-of-school PA. It would be worthwhile to explore whether
533 different types of curricula (e.g., a multi-activity or a concept-based curriculum) contribute
534 differently to changing the motivation of adolescents toward PE and PA participation (Ennis,
535 2011). Sound theoretical models should be utilized when examining these effects. For instance,
536 Chen and Hancock (2006) have proposed a theoretical model for PE researchers to study the
537 dynamic impact of personal, PE curriculum, and community variables on adolescent PA.
538 Goal 3. Internationally, previous PE intervention studies have shown desirable short term
Fo
539 benefits in regard to in-class PA of adolescents (for a review, see Dudley, Okely, Pearson, &
540 Cotton, 2011). But previous interventions have shown little effect on sustaining a physically
r
541 active lifestyle in later years (Kahn, Ramsey, & Brownson, 2002; McKenzie et al., 2003). Thus,
Pe
542 future studies should be conducted to determine the most beneficial teaching practices in PE to
er
543 initiate the most positive responses in learners and increase their willingness to be active during
544 out-of-school time. One possible theoretical framework to examine the role of teacher instruction
Re
545 in student PA participation could be the Trans-Contextual Model (TCM; Hagger et al., 2003).
546 Research based on TCM has shown autonomy-supportive instruction in PE to predict student
vi
547 autonomy not only in PE, but also in an out-of-school context and actual participation in PA (for
ew
548 a review, see Hagger & Chatizarantis, 2012).
549 Goal 4. Finally, future studies should determine how existing and emerging technology
550 could assist students to reach learning objectives. Current advances in health-technology, such as
551 motion sensors and smartphone applications could help PE teachers not only to engage students
552 in health-enhancing PA, but also and perhaps more importantly, educate and motivate students
553 toward life-long PA. For instance, wireless and real-life data transmission technologies allow
554 students to monitor their PA levels, track working-out at target heart rate, or evaluate burned
24
Page 25 of 35 Quest
555 calories during different activities. This technology could help teachers to provide immediate and
556 accurate feedback on areas such as energy expenditure and intensity during PE classes. In
557 addition, technology not only provides better possibilities to assess student performance in a
558 more efficient manner, but also provides information to students and parents alike. These
559 emerging technologies are also valuable tools in regards of future research endeavors.
560
561
Fo
562 Note 1
563 The literature search was conducted using Medline, ISI Web of Knowledge, ERIC, Scholar One,
r
564 and ARTO to identify observational and intervention studies in the area of physical education.
565 Additional studies were identified using the reference lists of research and review papers. The
Pe
566 search was restricted to peer-reviewed and data-driven articles and PhD level study reports.
567
er
Re
vi
ew
25
Quest Page 26 of 35
568
569 References
570 Aho, E., Pitkänen, K., & Sahlberg, P. (2006). Policy development and reform principles of basic
571 and secondary education in Finland since 1968. Washington, DC: World Bank.
572 Annerstedt, C. (2008). Physical education in Scandinavia with a focus on Sweden: A
573 comparative perspective. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 13, 303–318. doi:
574 10.1080/17408980802353354
Fo
575 Bailey, R., Armour, K., Kirk, D., Jess, M., Pickup, I., & Sandford, R. (2009). The educational
576 benefits claimed for physical education and school sport: An academic review. Research
r
577 Papers in Education, 24, 1–27.

Pe
578 Basic Education Act 628 § 1 (1998). Retrieved from

er
579 http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1998/en19980628.pdf
580 Basic Education Decree 422 § 1 (2012). Retrieved from

Re
581 http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2012/20120422
582 Berg, P., & Lahelma, E. (2010). Gendering processes in the field of physical education. Gender
vi
583 and Education, 22, 31–46. doi: 10.1080/09540250902748184

ew
584 Brown Ruzzi, B. (2005). Finland education report. National Center on Education and the
585 Economy. New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce. Retrieved from
586 http://www.ncee.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Finland-Education-Report.pdf
587 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United
588 States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 61(4), 1–168.
589 Chen, A., & Hancock, G. R. (2006). Conceptualizing a theoretical model for school-centered
590 adolescent physical activity intervention research. Quest, 58, 355–376.
26
Page 27 of 35 Quest
591 Currie, C., Gabhainn, S. N., Godeau, E., Roberts, C., Smith, R., Picket, W., … Barnekow, V.
592 (2008). Inequalities in young people’s health. Health behaviour in school-aged children.
593 International report from the 2005/2006 survey. (WHO Europe, Health Policy for
594 Children and Adolescents No. 5). Retrieved from
595 http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/53852/E91416.pdf
596 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human
597 behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.

Fo
598 Dudley, D., Okely, A., Pearson, P., & Cotton, W. (2011). A systematic review of the
599 effectiveness of physical education and school sport interventions targeting physical
r
600 activity, movement skills and enjoyment of physical activity. European Physical
Pe
601 Education Review, 17, 353–378. doi: 10.1177/1356336X11416734

er
602 Dumith, S. C., Gigante, D. P., Domingues, M. R., & Kohl, H. W. (2011). Physical activity
603 change during adolescence: A systematic review and a pooled analysis. International
Re
604 Journal of Epidemiology, 40, 468–498. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq272
605 Ennis, C. D. (2011): Physical education curriculum priorities: Evidence for education and
vi
606 skillfulness, Quest, 63, 5–18. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2011.10483659

ew
607 Eurofit. (1988). European test of physical fitness. Rome, Italy: Council of Europe, Committee for
608 the Development of Sport. Retrieved from http://www.bitworks-
609 engineering.co.uk/linked/eurofit%20provisional%20handbook%20leger%20beep%20test
610 %201983.pdf
611 Finnish National Board of Education. (1985). National core curriculum of Finnish basic
612 education. Vammala, Finland: Author.
27
Quest Page 28 of 35
614 education. Vammala, Finland: Author.
615 Finnish National Board of Education. (2001). National core curriculum of Finnish vocational
616 school physical education and health education. Vammala, Author.
617 Finnish National Board of Education. (2003). National core curriculum of Finnish upper
618 secondary school. Vammala, Finland: Author. Finnish National Board of Education.
619 (2004). National core curriculum of Finnish basic education. Retrieved from
Fo
620 http://www.oph.fi/download/139848_pops_web.pdf
r
622 education. Retrieved from

Pe
623 http://www.oph.fi/download/30179_Perusopetuksen_paattoarviointi_uudistuu.pdf
er
624 Gordon, T. (1974). Teachers’ effectiveness training. New York, NY: David McKay.
625 Haag, H., & Haag, G. (2001). From physical fitness to motor competence. Aims content-
Re
626 methods-evaluation. Frankfurt, Germany: Lang
627 Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. (2012). Transferring motivation from educational to
vi
628 extramural contexts: A review of the trans-contextual model. European Journal of

ew
629 Psychology of Education, 27, 195–212. doi: 10.1007/s10212-011-0082-5
630 Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Culverhouse, T., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2003). The
631 processes by which perceived autonomy support in physical education promotes leisure-
632 time physical activity intentions and behavior: A trans-contextual model. Journal of
633 Educational Psychology, 95, 784–795. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.784
634 Hagger, M., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Hein, V., Soos, I., Karsai, I., Lintunen, T., & Leemans, S.
635 (2009). Teacher, peer and parent autonomy support in physical education and leisure-
28
Page 29 of 35 Quest
636 time physical activity: A trans-contextual model of motivation in four nations.
637 Psychology and Health, 24, 689–711.
638 Hardman, K., & Marshall, J. (2009). Second world-wide survey of school physical education.
639 Final report. Berlin, Germany: ICSSPE.
640 Heikinaro-Johansson, P., & Telama, R. (2005). Physical education and health in Finland. In U.
641 Pühse & M. Gerber (Eds.), International comparison of physical education—Concepts,
642 problems, prospects (pp. 250–271). Aachen, Germany: Mayer & Meyer.
Fo
643 Heikinaro-Johansson, P., Varstala, V., & Lyyra M. (2008). Yläkoululaisten kiinnostus
644 koululiikuntaan ja kiinnostuksen yhteydet vapaa-ajan liikunnan harrastamiseen. [Middle

r
645 school students’ individual interest in physical education and the relationship between
Pe
646 individual interest and leisure time physical activity.]. Liikunta ja Tiede, 45(6), 31–37.
er
647 Huisman, T. (2004). Liikunnan arviointi peruskoulussa 2003. Yhdeksäsluokkalaisten kunto,
648 liikunta-aktiivisuus ja koululiikuntaan asennoituminen. [An evaluation of physical

Re
649 education learning outcomes in Finnish basic education 2003. Nine grade students
650 fitness, physical activity, and attitudes toward physical education.]. (Oppimistulosten
vi
651 arviointi 1/2004). Retrieved from

ew
652 http://www.oph.fi/download/48961_liikunnan_arviointi_peruskoulussa_2003.pdf
653 Huotari, P., Nupponen, H., Laakso, L., & Kujala, U. (2010a). Secular trends in aerobic fitness
654 performance in 13–18-year-old adolescents from 1976 to 2001. British Journal of Sports
655 Medicine, 44, 968–972. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.055913
656 Huotari, P., Nupponen, H., Laakso, L., & Kujala, U. (2010b). Secular trends in muscular fitness
657 among Finnish adolescents. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38, 739–747. doi:
658 10.1177/1403494810384425
29
Quest Page 30 of 35
659 Ilmanen, K. (1982). Voimistelunopettajakoulutuksen kuusi ensimmäistä vuosikymmentä. Vuodet
660 1882–1942. [Six first decades of physical education teacher education. Years 1882–
661 1942]. In K. Ilmanen & T. Voutilainen (Eds.), Jumpasta tiedekunnaksi. Suomalainen
662 voimistelunopettajakoulutus 100 vuotta 1882–1982 [100 years of Finnish Physical
663 Education Teacher Education 1882-1982] (pp. 11–173). Helsinki, Finland: Valtion
664 painatuskeskus.
665 Jaakkola, T. (2002). Changes in students’ exercise motivation, goal orientation, and sport
Fo
666 competence as a result of modifications in school physical education teaching practices
667 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

r
668 Retrieved from Kahn, E. B., Ramsey, L. T., & Brownson, R. C. (2002). The effectiveness
Pe
669 of interventions to increase physical activity: A systematic review. American Journal of

er
670 Preventive Medicine, 22(4), 73–107.
671 Kalaja, S. (2012). Fundamental movement skills, physical activity, and motivation toward
Re
672 Finnish school physical education: A fundamental movement skills intervention
673 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

vi
674 Retrieved from http://dissertations.jyu.fi/studsport/9789513948177.pdf

ew
675 Kirk, D. (2010). Physical education futures. London, England: Routledge.
676 Kuusela, M. (2005). Practice, learning, and use of social and emotional skills in physical
677 education classes for eight grade girls. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of
678 Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland. Retrieved from
679 http://www.likes.fi/kauppa/orders.asp?Function=Details&ID=160
30
Page 31 of 35 Quest
680 Laakso, L., Nupponen, H., & Telama, R. 1997. Koululaisten kunto ja liikunta-aktiivisuus - jäitä
681 hattuun. [School chidlren’s aerobic fitness and physical activity.]. Liikunta ja Tiede,
682 34(6), 4–7.
683 Laakso, L., Telama, R., Nupponen, H., Rimpelä, A., & Pere, L. (2008). Trends in leisure time
684 physical activity among young people in Finland, 1977–2007. European Physical
685 Education Review, 14, 139–152. doi: 10.1177/1356336X08090703
686 McKenzie, T. L., Li, D., Derby, C. A., Webber, L. S., Luepker, R. V. & Cribb, P. (2003).
Fo
687 Maintenance of effects of the catch physical education program: Results from the catch-
688 on study. Health Education & Behavior, 30, 447–462. doi: 10.1177/1090198103253535
r
689 Meinander, H. 1992. Koululiikunta etsii paikkaansa. [Physical education is gaining ground.]. In
Pe
690 T. Pyykkönen (Ed.), Suomi uskoi urheiluun. Suomen urheilun ja liikunnan historia
er
691 [Finland believed in Sport. The history of Finnish sport and exercise] (pp. 283–301).
692 Helsinki, Finland: VPK-kustannus.

Re
693 Ministry of Education and Culture (2010). Basic Education 2020—The national general
694 objectives and distribution of lesson hours. Retrieved from

vi
695 http://www.okm.fi/export/sites/default/OPM/Julkaisut/2010/liitteet/okmtr01.pdf?lang=en
ew
696 Nupponen, H. (1979). Koululiikunnan oppisisällöt ja niiden käytön edellytykset [School physical
697 education content analysis and applications]. (Research Reports on Sport and Health No.
698 25). Jyväskylä, Finland: Research Center for Sport and Health Sciences.
699 Nupponen, H. (1981). Koululaisten fyysis-motorinen kunto [School children’s physical and
700 motor fitness] (Research Reports on Sport and Health No. 30). Jyväskylä, Finland:
701 Research Center for Sport and Health Sciences. Nupponen, H., Laakso, L., Rimpelä, A.,
702 Pere, L., & Telama, R. (2010). Questionnaire-assessed moderate to vigorous physical
31
Quest Page 32 of 35
703 activity of the Finnish youth in 1979–2005. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science
704 in Sport, 20(1), 20–26.
705 Nupponen, H., Soini, H., & Telama, R. (1999). Koululaisten kunnon ja liikehallinnan
706 mittaaminen [Measurement of school students’ physical fitness and motor skills]
707 (Research Reports on Sport and Health No. 118). Jyväskylä, Finland: Research Center for
708 Sport and Health Sciences.
709 Nupponen, H., & Telama, R. 1998. Liikunta ja liikunnallisuus osana 11–16 –vuotiaiden
Fo
710 eurooppalaisten nuorten elämäntapaa. [Physical activity as a part of the life of European
711 11–16-year-olds.]. (Research Reports on Sport and Health No. 1). Jyväskylä, Finland:
r
712 Research Center for Sport and Health Sciences.

Pe
713 Official Statistics of Finland. (2012). Discontinuation of education [e-publication]. Helsinki,

er
714 Finland: Statistics Finland. Retrieved from http://www.stat.fi/til/kkesk/index_en.html
715 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010a). PISA 2009 Results:
Re
716 Executive Summary. Retrieved from
717 http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46619703.pdf
vi
718 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010b). Finland: Slow and steady
ew
719 reform for consistently high results. Strong performers and successful reformers in
720 education: Lessons from PISA for the United States. Retrieved from
721 http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46581035.pdf
722 Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Education indicators in
723 focus. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/skills-beyond-school/EDIF%202012--
724 N9%20FINAL.pdf
32
Page 33 of 35 Quest
725 Palomäki, S., & Heikinaro-Johansson, P. (2011). Liikunnan oppimistulosten seuranta-arviointi
726 perusopetuksessa 2010 [A follow-up evaluation of physical education learning outcomes
727 in Finnish basic education 2010] (Koulutuksen seuranta-raportit 2011/4). Retrieved from
728 http://www.oph.fi/download/131648_Liikunnan_seuranta-
729 arviointi_perusopetuksessa_2010.pdf
730 Pate, R. R., O'Neill, J. R., & McIver, K. L. (2011): Physical activity and health: Does physical
731 education matter? Quest, 63, 19–35. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2011.10483660

Fo
732 Pühse, U., & Gerber, M. (Eds.). (2005). International comparison of physical education;
733 Concepts, problems, prospects. Oxford, England: Meyer & Meyer.

r
734 Routti, J., & Ylä-Anttila, P. (2006). Finland as a knowledge economy. Elements of success and
Pe
735 lessons learned. Washington, DC: World Bank.

er
736 Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons. What can the world learn from educational change in
737 Finland? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Re
738 Sallis, J. F., McKenzie, T. L., Beets, M. W., Beighle, A., Erwin, H., & Lee, S. (2012). Physical
739 education's role in public health: Steps forward and backward over 20 years and HOPE
vi
740 for the future. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83, 125–135.
ew
741 Simola, H., Rinne, R., Varjo, J., Pitkänen, H., & Kauko, J. (2009). Quality assurance and
742 evaluation in Finnish compulsory schooling: A national model or just unintended effects
743 of radical decentralization? Journal of Education Policy, 24, 163–-178. doi:
744 10.1080/02680930902733139
745 Soini, M. (2006). The relationship of motivational climate to physical activity intensity and
746 enjoyment within ninth grade pupils in school physical education lessons (Unpublished
747 doctoral dissertation). University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland. Retrieved from
33
Quest Page 34 of 35
748 https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/bitstream/handle/123456789/13523/9513926648.pdf?sequence=1
749 Tammelin, T., Ekelund, U., Remes, J., & Näyhä, S. (2007). Physical activity and
750 sedentary behaviors among Finnish youth. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise,
751 39, 1067–1074. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b13e318058a603
752 Telama, R., Yang, X., Laakso, L., & Viikari, J. (1997). Physical activity in childhood and
753 adolescence as predictor of physical activity in young adulthood. American Journal of
754 Preventive Medicine, 13, 317–323.

Fo
755 Varstala, V., Telama, R., & Heikinaro-Johansson, P. (1987). Koulun liikuntatuntien
756 sisältötutkimus, menetelmäraportti [Curriculum and content in school physical education]

r
757 (Research Reports on Sport and Health No. 52). Jyväskylä, Finland: Research Center for
Pe
758 Sport and Health Sciences.

er
759 Yli-Piipari, S., Barkoukis, V., Jaakkola, T., & Liukkonen, J. (2013). The effect of physical
760 education goal orientations and enjoyment in adolescent physical activity: A parallel
Re
761 process latent growth analysis. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology 2, 15–31.
762 doi: 10.1037/a0029806

vi
763 Yli-Piipari, S., Jaakkola, T., & Liukkonen, J. (2010). Gender specific developmental dynamics
ew
764 between physical education task values and physical activity during junior high school.
765 Sport Science Review, 19, 231–246. doi: 10.2478/v10237-011-0039-2
766 Yli-Piipari, S., Leskinen, E., Jaakkola, T., & Liukkonen, J. (2012). Predictive role of physical
767 education motivation: The developmental trajectories of physical activity during grades
768 7–9. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 8, 702–711.</BI>
34
Page 35 of 35 Quest
Table 1.
Cross-national Reports of Finnish and the U.S. Adolescents Engagement in Daily Moderate-to-
Vigorous Physical Activity
Age Group Finnish Students The U.S. Students HBSC Average

Girls (%) Boys (%) Girls (%) Boys (%) Girls (%) Boys (%)
11-year-olds 37 48 26 33 22 30
13-year-olds 15 24 21 35 15 25
15-year-olds 9 15 14 34 12 20
Note 1. Based on the 2006 Health Behavior in School-aged Children Study.
Note 2. Adolescents responded on a one-item and an eight-point response scale (0–7 days of the week) question:
Fo
“Over the past 7 days, on how many days were you physically active for a total of at least 60 minutes per day?”
r Pe
er
Re
vi
ew
View publication stats

Physical Education Curriculum Reform in Finland

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Physical Education Curriculum Reform in Finland

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

Physical Education Curriculum Reform in Finland

Examination of need-supportive instruction View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Manuscript ID: Draft

Manuscript Type: Article

Keywords: physical education

Human Kinetics, 1607 N Market St, Champaign, IL 61825

2 Physical Education Curriculum Reform in Finland

17 physical education should be more easily justified and supported.

18 Keywords Curriculum reform, review study, elementary and middle schools

19 Health and Sport Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, 38152 Tennessee.

31 (PISA), a worldwide study of the scholastic performance of 15-year-old students in reading,

40 play (Sahlberg, 2011).

43 is a phase of education that aims to contribute to an individual’s development of physical,

44 cognitive, and psychosocial competencies. A quality PE program provides children and

46 participate in a variety of PAs as an ongoing part of a healthy lifestyle. As a mandated content

54 effectiveness of the current Finnish PE programs.

55 A Short History of Educational Reform in Finland

75 on equity; today it is supported by a homogeneous cultural and social agreement (Finnish

80 medical and dental checkups (Sahlberg, 2011).

84 moderated by different stakeholders, such as scholars, teachers, and administrators (Brown

88 highlighted teachers’ professionalism and local municipalities’ autonomy to implement a

96 completed in 2004 (OECD, 2010b).

109 based, private comprehensive schools).

124 years (OECD, 2010b).

125 A Short History of Physical Education in Finland

156 competencies (Finnish National Board of Education, 2004).

157 The Current State of Physical Education in Finland

158 Aims and Objectives

175 improving student learning (Sahlberg, 2011). As a consequence of decentralized education

184 student achievement.

185 Single-Gender Middle School Physical Education

203 Compulsory PE is typically organized around multi-activity programs in a series of units

213 Time Allocation

226 Assessment and Evaluation

227 Student assessment in comprehensive schools is intended to promote student learning,

257 evaluation policies, see Simola et al., 2009).

258 Review of Evidence on Effectiveness of Finnish Physical Education Programs

266 Student Attitudes and Motivation

287 Several studies have examined motivation-related variables in Finnish school PE

306 Social-Emotional Learning

307 Facilitating social growth and development of an individual is an important objective of

318 the unit.

319 Physical Activity of School-Aged Youth

336 Table 1 goes here

350 participation, in particular.

363 among girls.

371 Fitness of School-Aged Youth

391 Motor Skills of School-Aged Youth

419 group (time and experimental condition interaction.

420 Evidence Summary

426 relationships between school PE and student social-cognitive outcomes.

433 reviewed evidence on the impact of Finnish PE on adolescents’ psychomotor development is

450 to Finland, but to the U.S. as well.

451 Twenty-First Century Physical Education

452 Toward 2020: Physical Education Curriculum in Finland

472 should facilitate students’ health and well-being.

478 increased resources will be used for health-enhancing PE.

492 provide tools and motivation to engage health-enhancing PA.

505 Future Research

508 programs in relation to examined outcomes. Although a respectable amount of evidence in PA

518 Research in this area should seek four goals.