Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ENG 3500
3-30-2021
Hide-and-Seek Plotlines
The novel Fever Dream by Samanta Schweblin is far different from many other works
that we usually fit into the category of ‘novel’. For one, it had no breaks, taking the form of one
continuous conversation. There is also a reader’s difficulty in telling memory from the present or
reality from fantasy. The entire book seems as if it could be a dream, as is the goal with this
work, but it is uncommon for a novel to work in this way. Most importantly, however, this novel
crafts itself in a way that leaves the reader with more questions than they started with. There are
multiple ways in which the events of the novel can be interpreted, which is more characteristic of
poetry. There are no sure descriptions of what actually happens in the novel, only bigger lessons
to be learned. This unique characteristic of Fever Dream allows it to conform to its title, giving
According to the Britannica website, there are many types of novels and facets of the
genre that a writing can fall into. It seems like the genre of novel is more fluid than other genres
and has developed a lot since the first novel. If we look a bit at the discussion and definitions of
the genre that Britannica talks about, we can see some interesting and varied groups. They have a
range from gothic novels to pastoral novels to westerns. They deal with subject matter from
mysteries to thrillers to epic love stories. There are some commonalities, though, that stretch
across seemingly all genres that fall into the novel category. The elements that the webpage
discusses are plot, character, setting, point of view, dimension (length/depth), and significance of
the work. Not surprisingly, the first aspect discussed is plot. This is something any student would
raise their hand to respond with if asked what is most important in a novel. The ideas given here
provide great illumination to the idea of what a plot entails, beginning with a helpful tidbit that
follows: “The detailed working out of the nuclear idea requires much ingenuity, since the plot of
one novel is expected to be somewhat different than that of another, and there are very few basic
human situations for the novelist to draw upon… the novelist has to produce what look like
novelties” (Burgess). There must be events in the novel that differ from other novels in order to
grasp the reader’s attention. Fever Dream undoubtedly grabs the reader’s attention with its
divergence from normal content and common plot elements found in books. But what exactly are
the events? It seems as if there are unusual feelings in the novel but the events themselves at
times seem mundane, if not unidentifiable. Moving a bit further in Britannica’s description of
plot, interestingly enough, the text reads, “At the lowest level of fiction, plot need be no more
than a string of stock devices for arousing stock responses of concern and excitement in the
reader” (Burgess). This brings the story of Fever Dream into understanding a bit more. While it
deviates from the type of crystal-clear plot one normally finds in a novel, it does meet these base
emotional responses from the reader. It seems to intentionally conform to this ‘lowest level of
fiction’, crafting itself in a way in which the most underdeveloped plot on paper can create the
plot as a concept, we can see that there are some elements of the story that can be interpreted
different ways. For example, it is unclear whose soul lives in whom. On my first reading of the
novel, I was thinking along the lines of David’s soul perhaps having split and gone into Amanda,
the mother of Nina. It seemed strange how there was no reasoning for why they had decided to
vacation in this particular spot and for why she and Carla were so drawn to each other.
Additionally, she is having a conversation with David that seems as if it could almost be taking
place in her mind. Together, these ideas point towards the fact that perhaps their souls have been
intertwined. However, at the end of the book, after we are to assume that Amanda has died, it
seems that the writing suggests David has flipped souls with Nina herself. Amanda’s husband is
leaving the scene after talking with David’s father and sees that David has crawled into the
backseat of his car. The text reads, “…reaching slightly toward Nina’s stuffed mole, dirty
fingers resting on the stuffed legs as if trying to restrain them… Eyes desperately seek out my
husband’s gaze” (Schweblin, 182). This short scene right at the end of the novel made me
second-guess myself. Perhaps Nina and David were the ones who had shared souls the entire
time. Maybe that was the reason why there was a connection between the two families. But that
begs the question of inconsistent timelines because Nina was not born when David had the
transmigration. So did the other half of David’s soul flip with Nina’s when Amanda passed and
Nina had her transmigration? In this aspect of the story alone I find these three different
possibilities, which is very abnormal for the plot lines of novel. It is not characteristic of novel
storylines to be so unclear in relating to what events took place. Usually, there is a certain event
to discuss, and then varied meanings are taken from that occurrence. In Fever Dream, however,
the events themselves are blurred at the edges and the reader must draw on context clues in order
Even in reading the conversation between Amanda and David, it is difficult to tell
coaxing her to tell her story and get to the important details, but then we suddenly find out that
Amanda has told most of this story multiple times already and we are hearing the retelling.
Therefore, after so many retellings to the point that she is delirious and cannot even remember
her past conversation, how reliable is her telling of the story? Since her narration is so unreliable,
the events of the story are difficult to really map out. What happens first, second, and third?
What events happened the way she retells them and which ones actually occurred in a different
manner? Amanda speaks to David about what she thinks happened and David responds, “No, no.
It’s not about worms. It feels like worms, at first, in your body. But, Amanda, we’ve been
through all this, too. We’ve already talked about the poison, the contamination. You’ve already
told me four times how you got here” (Schweblin, 110). The reader can hear the aggravation in
David’s voice at the fact that Amanda cannot remember telling him this already. But perhaps
David and Amanda did indeed swap souls and now Amanda is simply having a conversation
with herself in her head. Maybe these are just her own thoughts trying to work themselves out.
She needs to come to terms with the facts and what happened, but the events are as unclear to her
as they are to the reader. Maybe she thinks she is talking to David but is actually only talking to
the part of him that inhabits her. The reader cannot know because nothing is clearly stated. In
fact, there are no quotation marks, only italics, so the reader cannot be certain if David is present
Fever Dream seems to loosely fit into the genre of a novel considering its deviation from
the common form that plot takes in novels. The events of the story are difficult to follow and to
differentiate between. The narration plays an interesting role in this feverish aspect of the text as
well. It is hard to tell if the events that are portrayed are true accounts of what actually happened
since they come from an unreliable viewpoint and are a retelling of past events. The story is
slippery, and the reader finds oneself trying to sift through larger emotions and feelings to find
the core details of plot. Events blend together, change, and morph into something entirely new.
method-and-point-of-view
Schweblin, Samanta. Fever Dream. New York, Penguin Random House, 2014.