Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sometimes it’s the brand’s fault, but on other occasions, such allegations may be staged to
sully a brand’s image. Regardless of whether an accusation is justified or not, a brand’s
image must stay afloat.
To protect their reputation, brands should put in place mechanisms to manage their
credibility when crises arise. That’s where Public Relations meets crisis management. From
engaging internal PR departments to hiring external consultants, PR plays key roles in crisis
management.
#1. Research
This role involves assessing different mediums to ascertain problems caused by a crisis,
who is engaging with the said information, and what type of backlash a brand is getting in
their key markets.
In a recent case of a delay from Southwest Airlines, the airline was quick to stage its
information to demonstrate the value of empowered and empathetic employees. In this
case, a quick-thinking gate attendant turned the delay into a fun moment by playing games
with the waiting passengers. Through the immediate response of that quick-thinking
employee and the airline’s PR, a near-crisis situation turned into a public relations win.
In contrast, Boeing’s poor and delayed response to the Boeing 737 Max issue caused a PR
fail. The delay to acknowledge and respond to reports implicating the software installed in
the Boeing 737 Max jets and the issuance of contradictory information on the crisis cost
Boeing its brand reputation.
https://ronntorossian.com/pr-crisis/ 2/5
9/6/21, 3:09 PM Role of PR in Crisis Management - Ronn Torossian
Given the importance of crisis communication, the following post highlights cases that
provide valuable lessons that companies can learn from to sidestep PR crises.
Boeing’s ill-advised attempts to deflect connections between the Boeing 737 Max crashes
furthered mistrust in the brand and worsened the extent of the problem.
Following the Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 incident, Boeing made several missteps in its PR.
Dennis Muilenburg, Boeing’s ousted CEO, took close to a month to acknowledge and
respond to two reports implicating the software installed in the Boeing 737 Max jets. This
approach went against the important ground rule of responding to major crises in a timely
manner (possibly within 24 to 48 hours after a crisis).
At the same time, as Muilenburg apologized, the apology seemed shifty. Notably, Boeing’s
ousted CEO seemed to blame the pilots of the ill-fated Ethiopian Airline jet, making
customers and key stakeholders more distrustful. While expressing confidence in the safety
of Boeing 737 Max jets, Muilenburg claimed the pilots of the ill-fated plane failed to adhere
to best practices stipulated in the manufacturer’s emergency procedures. This went against
PR tenets of being honest and empathetic in a crisis.
https://ronntorossian.com/pr-crisis/ 3/5