Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Although a perfect solar cell would also be a perfect LED, corresponding to a blackbody radiation with refractive index
in reality neither device exists. However, excellent devices n = 1. In Eq. 共1兲, h is Planck’s constant, c the vacuum speed
that come relatively close to the respective ideal limits are to of light, and kT the thermal energy. A portion a共rS , , , E␥兲
be found. It is interesting to note that high-efficiency silicon depending on the coordinate rS of the surface element dS, the
solar cells, i.e., those which approach the SQ radiative limit, angles of incidence , 共as defined in Fig. 1兲, and the photon
can be used as LEDs with essentially the same design.2 energy E␥ is absorbed by the solar cell. As a consequence of
These highly sophisticated devices achieve an external Kirchhoff’s law, this incident radiation is in equilibrium with
共LED兲 quantum efficiency EQELED ⬇ 1%, where EQELED is the radiation emitted from the cell’s surface.
defined as the ratio between the number of photons emitted Since we are dealing with a solar cell, a fraction of the
from the surface of the sample and the number of recombin- absorbed photons will generate free electron-hole pairs along
ing electron-hole pairs. In contrast, the photovoltaic the optical path, as illustrated by Fig. 1. These charge carriers
EQEPV共E␥兲 of a solar cell is a spectral quantity defined as the will have a probability FC共rS , , , E␥兲 of being collected by
ratio of collected charge carriers to the number of photons the junction of the cell. Therefore, the probability that one
with energy E␥ incident on the cell’s surface. EQELED ⬇ 1% photon impinging on the solar cell contributes one elemen-
is a highly respectable value for silicon devices but small tary charge q to the short circuit current is given by
when compared to LEDs made from organic Q共rS , , , E␥兲 = aFC, where a is the absorptance of the cell.
semiconductors3 with EQELED ⬇ 15%.4 In contrast, solar Under solar irradiation, an excess flux density sun im-
cells made from organic materials5 have power conversion pinges on the solar cell, leading to a short circuit current,
efficiencies hardly exceeding 2% 共compared to 25% of the
best silicon solar cell6兲. Clearly, at a practical level, below
the idealized SQ case, quality requirements for solar cells
JSC = q 冕 冕冕
⍀sun E␥ Sc
Q共rS, , ,E␥兲sun共, ,E␥兲d⍀dE␥dS,
and LEDs diverge considerably.
共2兲
The present paper gives a detailed balance theory that
embraces also less idealized solar cells and LEDs by adding where the integrals extend over the angle of incidence ⍀sun
the aspect of electronic transport to the SQ theory. The cen- and the energy range 共E␥兲 of the solar irradiation and the
emitted light SQ limit,1 both quantities, EQEPV and Q共rS , , , E␥兲, are
unity for photons with energies E␥ 艌 Eg and zero if E␥ ⬍ Eg.
incident light
d Next, we postulate that injection of the current component
␦Jem that leads to the radiative emission of photons under an
applied voltage V follows an exponential law. Since this dark
injection current is superimposed on the component ␦JSC,0,
surface
the excess photon flux density em emitted from the device
dS . follows Shockley’s diode law,7
JSC,0
generation
volume em =
␦Jem,0
q
冉 冊
exp
qV
kT
−
␦JSC,0 ␦Jem,0
q
=
q
exp 冋 冉 冊 册
qV
kT
−1 .
共5兲
Jem,0 Note that Secs. III and IV below clarify the conditions for
light path the validity of the postulate leading to Eq. 共5兲. However, the
junction more intuitive approach used at this stage reveals an impor-
tant property of the detailed balance between photon emis-
FIG. 1. Illustration of the reciprocal action of light absorption sion and photon collection in solar cells: the ability of a solar
and subsequent carrier collection, complemented by current injec- cell to emit photons 共expressed by ␦Jem,0兲 is linked directly
tion and light emission. In equilibrium, the short circuit current to optical generation and carrier collection due to the black-
␦JSC,0 induced by photons entering into the solar cell through the body ambient radiation 共expressed by ␦JSC,0兲.
surface element dS within the angle d⍀ is counterbalanced by the Combining Eqs. 共4兲 and 共5兲 yields
saturation current ␦Jem,0. This injection current leads to an emission
of photons equilibrating the incident photons.
冋 冉 冊 册
from the ambient, all equilibrium radiation leads to charge
carriers that are collected by the junction. We have therefore qV
to account for an “equilibrium” short circuit current, ⫻ exp −1 . 共7兲
kT
JSC,0 = q 冕冕冕
⍀c E␥ Sc
Q共rS, , ,E␥兲eq共E␥, 兲d⍀dE␥dS, Thus, Eqs. 共6兲 and 共7兲 allow us to use the partial external
quantum efficiency Q共rS , , , E␥兲 of the solar cell to predict
共3兲 the spectral and angular emittance of the device if operated
as an LED and vice versa. These equations are, therefore, the
resulting from the ambient blackbody flux eq共E␥ , 兲 inte-
differential and the integral version of a reciprocity relation
grated over the full spherical angle ⍀c = 2. However, in
that connects the complementary action of solar cells and
thermal equilibrium, no net current is flowing through the
LEDs in situations somewhat less ideal than the SQ limit.
device. Therefore, we must postulate that the short circuit
current JSC,0 is counterbalanced by an equilibrium injection
current Jem,0 = JSC,0. Moreover, a similar balance, III. RECIPROCITY IN ELECTRONIC TRANSPORT
␦Jem,0 = ␦JSC,0 = qQ共rS, , ,E␥兲eq共E␥, 兲, 共4兲 In the preceding section, we obtained reciprocity relations
holds for any component ␦JSC,0 of JSC,0 that is generated 共6兲 and 共7兲 in a rather intuitive way. We now give a rigorous
from any angular component of the ambient blackbody ra- proof, concentrating on the nature of the optoelectronic
diation at any surface element of the cell. transport processes compatible with the reciprocity relations.
As shown in Fig. 1, we have now introduced a new de- It will be shown that the validity of Eqs. 共6兲 and 共7兲 presup-
tailed balance pair, namely, light absorption with subsequent poses an earlier reciprocity theorem derived by Donolato.8
carrier collection complemented by carrier injection with This theorem relates the local carrier collection probability f c
subsequent light emission. The quantity Q共rS , , , E␥兲, if within the illuminated solar cell to the minority carrier con-
measured under normal incidence and averaged over the cell centration in the same device under forward voltage V in the
surface, corresponds to the photovoltaic external quantum dark. With equilibrium minority carrier concentrations p0共r兲
efficiency EQEPV as defined above. Therefore, we denote at a site r in the volume of the absorber material and p0共j兲 at
Q共rS , , , E␥兲 the partial external quantum efficiency. In the the collecting junction of the cell, this theorem reads
085303-2
RECIPROCITY RELATION BETWEEN PHOTOVOLTAIC… PHYSICAL REVIEW B 76, 085303 共2007兲
␦ pd共r兲
p0共r兲
冒 ␦ pd共j兲
p0共j兲
= f c共r兲, 共8兲 (a)
drb
(b)
drs,r)
surface
dAb dS
where the quantities ␦ pd共r兲 and ␦ pd共j兲 denote the 共dark兲 ex-
cess minority carrier concentrations at coordinate r and at the dba
junction, respectively. Note that in a pn-junction solar cell,
p0共j兲 is the carrier density at the edge of the space charge
region. Thus, the junction itself is not part of Donolato’s dab dr,rs)
theory, except in defining the boundary conditions.
From Shockley’s diode law,7 we may write ␦ p共j兲
dAa dr dA(r)
= p0共j兲关exp共qV / kT兲 − 1兴 and transform Eq. 共8兲 into dra
␦ pd共r兲
p0共r兲
冋 冉 冊 册
= f c共r兲 exp
qV
kT
−1 . 共9兲 FIG. 2. 共a兲 Illustration of the optical interaction between two
volume elements dAadra and dAbdrb. Note that the difference be-
A series of generalizations to the original theorem9–12 estab- tween the spherical angles d⍀ab and d⍀ba is due to the assumed
lished that Eq. 共8兲 is valid, provided that the minority carrier difference of the refractive index in ra and rb. This change of the
transport in the solar cell is described by the generalized refractive index is indicated by the kinks in the optical interaction
diffusion equation of del Alamo and Swanson,13 cones. 共b兲 Interaction between a surface element dS and a volume
element dA共r兲dr. Light is entering or is emitted within the spherical
1 angle d⍀共rS , r兲, whereas dS 共located at coordinate rS兲 is seen from
− ⵜ关D共r兲p0共r兲 ⵜ u共r兲兴 + p 共r兲u共r兲 = g共r兲, 共10兲
共r兲 0 the volume element 共located at r兲 within the angle d⍀共r , rS兲.
085303-3
UWE RAU PHYSICAL REVIEW B 76, 085303 共2007兲
1
=
4n2 冕 ␣共E␥兲bb共E␥兲dE␥
, 共18兲
IV. OPTOELECTRONIC RECIPROCITY
− ⵜ关D共r兲p0共r兲 ⵜ u共r兲兴 +
1
p 共r兲u共r兲 −
共r兲 0
冕
V
共r,r⬘兲u共r⬘兲dr⬘ Integrating Eq. 共22兲 over the optical path, with n共rS兲 being
the refractive index of the ambient, i.e., n共rS兲 = 1, we have
= g共r兲, 共21兲
where the integral extends over the cell volume and the life-
time is now the combination of nonradiative and radiative
em共rS,⍀S,E␥兲 = 冕 T共r,rS兲␣共r兲bb共E␥兲u共r兲dr. 共25兲
lifetimes with −1 = r−1 + nr
−1
. Note that the interaction term
for photon recycling was already used in the 1970s 共Refs. 19 By means of Donolato’s reciprocity theorem 关Eq. 共8兲兴 and
and 20兲 in the context of the regular diffusion equation for a the symmetry T共r , rS兲 = T共rS , r兲, we finally obtain
085303-4
RECIPROCITY RELATION BETWEEN PHOTOVOLTAIC… PHYSICAL REVIEW B 76, 085303 共2007兲
FIG. 3. A solar cell or LED viewed as a multiprobe device. The It is worthwhile pointing out that the integral reciprocity
inputs and outputs of the electrical terminals and the optical termi- relation 关Eq. 共7兲兴 yields a detailed balance theory that not
nals are linked by reciprocity relations. only extends previous reciprocity relations but also general-
izes the SQ approach to less idealized situations allowing for
冋 冉 冊 册
both the calculation of the short circuit current JSC by inte-
qV gration of Eq. 共2兲 and J0,em from Eq. 共7兲. In turn, JSC and
⫻ exp −1 . 共26兲 J0,em enable us to derive the radiative limit,
kT
In the next step, we follow an incoming photon flux kT JSC
rad
VOC = ln , 共30兲
in共rS兲␦⍀in that propagates along the same optical path in q Jem,0
the inverse direction, such that ⌽共r兲 = T共rS , r兲in共rS兲␦⍀in at
for the open circuit voltage of a specific device directly from
each point. This photon flux will generate a short circuit
experimental data.
current,
However, the measured open circuit voltage VOC will
冋 冉 冊 册 冉 冊
procity relation between the photovoltaic quantum efficiency
and electroluminescent emission of solar cells and LEDs. qV qV
Jem = Jem,0 exp − 1 ⬇ Jem,0 exp , 共32兲
In practice, the external photovoltaic quantum efficiency kT kT
EQEPV共E␥兲 is measured at normal incidence. For this situa-
for the radiative emission current. Combining the logarithm
tion, we may reformulate Eq. 共6兲 as
of Eq. 共31兲 with Eq. 共32兲 at a bias voltage V = VOC yields
em
norm
共E␥兲 = EQEPV共E␥兲bb共E␥兲 exp 冋 冉 冊 册qV
kT
− 1 , 共29兲
ln共EQELED兲 = ln 冋 Jem,0 exp共qVOC/kT兲
Jinj共VOC兲
册
em 共E␥兲
冋 册
norm
which relates the luminescence emission normal to
qVOC Jem,o
the surface of the device to the EQEPV. = + ln . 共33兲
Equation 共29兲 thus connects the optical output of a solar kT Jinj共VOC兲
cell and its electrical input and vice versa. This suggests a In the open circuit situation, we have the equality between
picture of a solar cell or LED, as shown in Fig. 3, that is the injected current Jinj共VOC兲 and the short circuit current JSC
inspired by the electrical multichannel systems analyzed by 共cf. Fig. 4兲 such that the total current Jtot共V兲 = Jinj共V兲 − JSC
Büttiker et al.24 In a solar cell or LED, we have not only one
amounts to zero. With Jinj共VOC兲 = JSC and Eq. 共30兲, we finally
or more electrical terminals or probes but also optical termi-
obtain
nals according to light of different wavelengths. The inter-
changing of electrical input/output and optical input/output is kT
regulated by the above reciprocity relation. The reciprocity ⌬VOC = VOC
rad
− VOC = − ln共EQELED兲. 共34兲
q
between different optical terminals in Fig. 3 is described by
Würfel’s generalization of Kirchhoff’s law,25 which will be Figure 4 illustrates Eq. 共34兲 by showing that the radiative
discussed in Sec. VII. The electrical terminals are interre- current Jem共V兲 has a slope of unity in a semilogarithmic plot
085303-5
UWE RAU PHYSICAL REVIEW B 76, 085303 共2007兲
085303-6
RECIPROCITY RELATION BETWEEN PHOTOVOLTAIC… PHYSICAL REVIEW B 76, 085303 共2007兲
ponents, the essential ingredient to boost the efficiency of potential of photons.25 Application of Eq. 共37兲 to a combina-
organic solar cells,31 leads to PL quenching that is now, how- tion of PL and absorption measurements yields valuable in-
ever, independent of the bias conditions. A low-mobility ma- formation on the maximum open circuit voltage that may be
terial alone is thus unlikely to yield high-efficiency solar realized in Si wafers34 and Cu共In, Ga兲Se2 thin films.35
cells because a low short circuit current enters linearly in the It is interesting to note that replacing by qV and a共E␥兲
output power P of the solar cell 关Eq. 共35兲兴. by EQEPV共E␥兲 in Eq. 共37兲 leads to Eq. 共29兲. The analogy
In contrast, as long as the nonradiative 共nonemitting兲 re- between the present reciprocity given by Eq. 共29兲 and Wür-
combination current Jne共V兲 at a given bias voltage V is fel’s equation demonstrates the similarities and differences
smaller than the emitted current Jem共V兲, the present theorem between the reciprocity in PL and EL. The role of the split-
II predicts a reasonably high external LED quantum effi- ting of the quasi-Fermi levels in PL is played by the junction
ciency EQELED. Therefore, low-mobility materials with a voltage V for the case of EL. Note that in the latter case, the
low portion of nonemitting recombination may yield highly quantity equals qV only at the location of the junction and
efficient LEDs. that may thus vary freely according to the restrictions of
Turning now to the other departure from the SQ situation, electronic transport without violating the reciprocity relation.
we consider a semiconductor with a low nonradiative life- For PL, the prefactor a共E␥兲 in Eq. 共37兲 only reflects the op-
time nr but a mobility that is high enough to enable perfect tical properties of the semiconductor,EQEPV共E␥兲, whereas
carrier collection. Such a device would have an EQEPV that the analogous quantity in Eq. 共29兲 contains the absorptance
is close to unity in the relevant spectral range. Operating as and in addition the probability of charge carrier collection
an LED, such a device would emit more photons at a given within the device. The inequality EQEPV共E␥兲 艋 a共E␥兲 results
bias voltage than a device built from a low-mobility material from the fact that EQEPV共E␥兲 considers the series connection
with low EQEPV 共cf. theorem I兲. However, as Jne is much of light absorption and carrier collection. In a similar way,
larger than Jem, we obtain a poor EQELED, making the mate- reciprocity theorem I 关Eqs. 共6兲, 共7兲, and 共29兲兴 results from the
rial rather unsuitable as an LED. However, this low-lifetime series connection of the detailed balance pair light absorption
material may still yield a very good solar cell because the and emission with the pair carrier collection and injection.
high mobility results in a high EQEPV and hence a high JSC.
The measured open circuit voltage VOC of this device will, IX. CONCLUSIONS
however, be smaller than the radiative limit as predicted by
theorem II. This loss might be acceptable because EQELED The present paper has developed two basic reciprocity
enters only logarithmically into Eq. 共33兲 and consequently relations between the photovoltaic and the electrolumines-
also in Eq. 共34兲. Therefore, even a relatively low EQELED cent actions of solar cells and LEDs. The first relates the
still yields a reasonably high VOC, as demonstrated specifi- spectral and angular dependence of the electroluminescence
cally by high-efficiency silicon solar cells.6 A more quantita- of solar cells and light emitting diodes to the spectral and
tive exploration of these points is given in Ref. 32 and direct angular photovoltaic external quantum efficiency. The sec-
experimental evidence for the validity of Eqs. 共29兲 and 共34兲 ond reciprocity relation connects the open circuit voltage of a
from highly efficient Si and Cu共In, Ga兲Se2 solar cells is solar cell and its EL quantum efficiency. Combination of
shown in Ref. 33. both relations allows for a detailed characterization of the
photovoltaic properties of a device by measuring its elec-
troluminescent properties and vice versa.
VIII. RELATIONS BETWEEN PHOTOLUMINESCENCE
In view of the considerable volume of work analyzing
AND ELECTROLUMINESCENCE
photovoltaic devices by means of EL techniques,36–38 it is
There exist close analogies between the present electroop- important to note that the validity of both reciprocity rela-
tical reciprocity relations and the analysis of optoelectronic tions requires no special assumptions on the nature of the
materials by PL measurements. In the latter case, the reci- nonradiative recombination mechanism dominating the cur-
procity between the potential open circuit voltage, i.e., the rent voltage. We only need the validity of the principle of
actual splitting of the quasi-Fermi levels, and the PL emis- detailed balance for the radiative part of the recombination
sion is given by Würfel’s generalization of Kirchhoff’s law.25 current. Thus, both reciprocity relations should have a wide
For the case of emission normal to the semiconductor sur- range of applicability.
face, this may be written as
冋 冉 冊 册
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
PL共E␥兲 ⬇ a共E␥兲bb共E␥兲 exp −1 , 共37兲 The author is grateful to T. Kirchartz, J. Mattheis, S. Rey-
kT
nolds, and J. H. Werner for valuable discussions and argu-
where PL共E␥兲 is the excess PL intensity, a共E␥兲 the absorp- ments. This work was supported by a grant from the German
tance of the semiconductor at a given photon energy E␥, and Ministry for Research and Technology 共Contract No.
is the split of quasi-Fermi levels that equals the chemical 03SF0308E兲.
085303-7
UWE RAU PHYSICAL REVIEW B 76, 085303 共2007兲
*Corresponding author. u.rau@fz-juelich.de 20 K. Mettler, Phys. Status Solidi A 49, 163 共1978兲.
1
W. Shockley and H. J. Queisser, J. Appl. Phys. 32, 510 共1961兲. 21
A. Goetzberger and V. Wittwer, Sol. Cells 4, 3 共1981兲.
2 22
M. A. Green, J. Zhao, A. Wang, P. J. Reece, and M. Gal, Nature U. Rau, F. Einsele, and G. C. Glaeser, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87,
共London兲 412, 805 共2001兲. 171101 共2005兲.
3 For a recent review, see R. H. Friend, R. W. Gymer, A. B. 23 T. Markvart, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 026101 共2006兲.
Holmes, J. H. Burroughes, R. N. Marks, C. Taliani, D. D. C. 24 M. Büttiker, Y. Imry, R. Landauer, and S. Pinhas, Phys. Rev. B
vices ED-31, 1878 共1984兲. taic Solar Energy Conference 共Harwood Academic, Montreux,
14
B. A. Gregg, J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 4688 共2003兲. 1992兲, pp. 320–322.
15 U. Rau and R. Brendel, J. Appl. Phys. 84, 6412 共1998兲. 35 G. H. Bauer, R. Brüggemann, S. Tardon, S. Vignoli, and R.
16 W. P. Dumke, Phys. Rev. 105, 139 共1957兲.
Kniese, Thin Solid Films 480-481, 410 共2005兲.
17 A. Martì, J. L. Balenzategui, and R. F. Reyna, J. Appl. Phys. 82, 36 T. Trupke, E. Daub, and P. Würfel, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells
085303-8