Professional Documents
Culture Documents
.0"1
- * .- /0 -) ** & ,+ ! "#$# %& '& ( ) ) *
7& 89 :; < 4 ) =* +1 . 23 %& ) 4 .(#, . 5 6 , . %
1-9 & 1- ( =* .- 7)*?-4 %& + # 8 09 ) 7/ > 6 , . . /0 )
- -& -D 7) - .- 5 =* . %& +1 4 @ A ) B* 09 . C )
) . 6E, * %& > ) =* + 09 . C ) E 3 FG * ; G 1 &
H& - -) 1I# . 8 >& J, * 8 . @ JK >& J, L = * 9 B * 09 . C
+ &# GTL E I . & H& . >& J, & 9 I =* * .
.0$* 2 3$*
. J L74* , 9L & #I M #9 LGTL L 09 L19 &
4 .5
) &R 7) * N O E P#( .9 A Q L1I# #". & & 9 5 6 * 19 &
) #, ) Q" S # (. & + 09 # J ;G 1 &
+# < @A ) B* . *
Behtash.Karami@nigc.info
GTL ! " # $% &' ( )% ' #
GTL . 6 %
. * & ] H-Tropsh 74* , Z ) * F-Fisher 9Z 9 )[* \ #, X Y < GTL & 9
SU ^ =* W& GTL & 9 + # . 6 (F-T)74* ,
9 & 9 # " . ! 3* ) 8 > C % )
[1]+ .0B * >' .
# [ 5 (ATR) & #I M #9 # W& * ? *_ / ) . @ JK 7 * <* .0B
+ C#, 8 *
6 * >& J, . C* <#EG . [ % ) [ # 74* , 97 * 8 [* .0B
a> P* ` 6 & !R#EG #, M * ;U, ) &R 4 1@ A <# @ ) =*
+ ! A*<U L Ib 1 0 3 . C#,
8 C#, c
#I M #9 P8( # * / C#, C#'C# I d, * ]# ) =* 6 .0B %&
+ # >& J, 8 . V , ? * &
;I % * ) C#, c
L1C J .0 ( 809 ) 1 C, 6 * 9 7& 89 #, FT 7 4* , 9 #', W& 6
[1]+ >& J, ;I ) % * ) . ++++* [# , L>'
;I ) % * ) 1 6 7& 89 * 7&R 4 cY
e 16 &R 4 . ) & 9 & 6 I .0B
M * )
*8 C , M #9
# *8&
% 0 'C
LPG
+ C#,+++* Kerosene LNaphtha LGasoline e.0 ( "# !R#EG
S) 9 H& . >& J, ' . ) &R 4 * $*S ) 7/ '& B * %&
B * %& + *
GTL &)7
+. ) & 9 & . 1J & 9 %& [ I 16 >A B 1I# # 8 , c
. ) & 9 & . 1J & 9 %& f .& 1 3 # % &4 c
[2]+1 . & U ) .# & GTL & 9 >A B 1I# 1 6 & >'
)7 *
ATR
= * 9 B* >A B %& . & #I M #9 # W& > GTL & 9 .0B % *
&f4 ! #A F.T # W& 6 & 9 %& L 6 k #I # " .
# # !R @
+ ) T & #I M #9 & 9 . & ) 7 * ."# 5
CH 4 + H 2 o ↔ Co + 3H 2 ∆H R = −206kj / mol
Co + H 2 o ↔ H 2 + Co2 ∆H R = −41.2kj / mol (WGS reaction)
CH 4 + 1.5O2 → Co + 2 H 2 o ∆H R = −519kj / mol
F.T )7 * 0 [ 9
nCo + 2nH 2 → −(CH 2 )n − + nH 2 o ∆H R = −165kj / mol
1C B !R @
.C @ %& 6 1 ( [ R \& .0 & 1 6 SRK 1C B .C @ & 9[5 1 (
e#
1 C* 'C ^ <#0G c
H& & 9 c
i 9 cY
RT a (T )
P= −
v − b v (v + b )
where a(T ) − {1 + m(1 − Tr0.5 )}2 , m = 0.48 + 1.1524 w − 0.17 w 2
. J \&
+1 .9 Q & 9 & 4 1C B
+1 w 9 < ,*8& #
+ d, * * 1 D @ JK **
+ % ) F.T & 9 ) 1 C ,
.5
%& . 8 09 ) OfB % )L R _fB ) S B K 6 !J , # OfB
4 =* + S 1@ A 2 # OfB . 97 # R . . 23
. (#, E3 Q B * %& x B . ) # 09 ) 19 & 1 ( GTL B * .J
8 E 3 7/ Q #K % ) * @ JK . 1J GTL !R#EG *89 = . #K . 1 &f4
+
! 4
+y& 1GA <#EB 1 ( Aspen Plus ) .J & .J 5 [5
H(
[1] D. Schanke, P. Lian, S. Eri, E. Rytter, B.H. Sannaes, K.J. Kinnari, Optimization of
Fischer–Tropsch reactor design and operation in GTL plant, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal.
136 (2010) 239–244.
[2] The case for GTL Rationale, economics and the future, Rajnish Goswami, - GTL Summit London, 11-
12th September 2009.
[3] B. Delmon, J.T. Yates, A.P. Steynberg, M.E. Dry 2004, Fischer Tropsch Technology, Elsevier BV.
Page 50250.
[4] Choi, G.N. Kramer, S.J. Tam, S.T. Fox, J.Min Spring National Meeting, American Institute of Chemical Engineers,
Houston, 1999.
[5] Robert B. Anderson, The Fischer-Tropsch synthesis; Academic Press; Orlando, (1984).
[6] Gilbert F. Foment and Kenneth B.Bischoff, Chemical Reactors Analysis and Design, 2nd
edition, (1990).