Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Regulations of Banks
Review Exercise 5
Regulations of Banks
13 What are the mechanisms of deposit insurance adopted in the and in the ? (4 marks) 2008-3a-ZAB
14 Explain the role of deposit insurance in the regulation of a banking system and discuss2010-4b-ZB
the solutions to the moral hazard problem created by deposit insurance. (11 marks)
16 4(b) Explain the role of deposit insurance in the regulation of a banking system and2010-4b-ZB
discuss the solutions to the moral hazard problem created by deposit insurance. (11
marks)
17 Discuss the role of a deposit insurance scheme within a system of bank regulation. (102006-3b-ZA
marks)
18 Identify the possible solutions to the moral hazard problem arising from a system of2008-3c-ZAB
100% insurance of deposits. (6 marks)
19 What are the methods used to handle a failed bank in the USA? (6 20083bZAB
20 What is the solution to the moral hazard problem arising from the “too big to fail”2008-3d-ZAB
policy? (4 marks)
21 Examine the ‘too big to fail problem’ in banking and discuss possible solutions to this2012-4b-ZA
problem. (13 marks)
22 Explain the `too big to fail problem' in relation to banking. Explain why this has become2013-4b-ZA
a problem in banking and discuss solutions to this problem. (13m)
23 Discuss the causes, consequences & possible solutions to the2014-4-ZA
‘too big to fail’ problem in banking. (25 marks)
24 How can bank regulation reduce the bank’s incentive to take risks? 2007-3a-ZAB
25 Identify typical aspects of a banks capital requirement as imposed by2008-5c-ZA
regulators. (5 marks)
26 Explain the importance of capital in preventing bank failures. (7 m) 2011-3a-ZA
27 Define what a bank’s capital is and explain why bank capital is important in2010-4a-ZA
protecting depositors from loss. (8 marks)
28 Explain the risk-assets ratio under Basel 1 & discuss the main problems that have been2008-5d-ZAB
identified with it. How will it change under 2? (13 marks)
29 Explain how the risk assets’ ratio under 1 was constructed and discuss the2011-3b-ZA
problems with this construction. (10 marks)
30 Explain the changes to the construction of the risk assets’ ratio under 2 &2011-3c-ZA
and discuss to what extent the changes address the problems with the 1
construction.(8 marks)
31 Explain the risk assets ratio introduced under the 1 capital adequacy regime2010-4b-ZA
and outline the main problems with this 1 ratio. (9 marks)
32 Explain the risk-assets ratio under 1 and discuss the main problems that2006-5b-ZA
have been identified with it. ( 13marks)
33 3(c) Explain the risk-assets ratio under 1 and discuss the main problems that have been20073c-ZAB
identified with it. How will it change under Basel2 ? (13 marks) 4
Free Banking
= un____________________ financial (banking) systems (x Regulated banking system)
= financial system with no c_____ b___/ no financial regulator/ no government intervention.
operate freely, subject to market forces & the rules of ‘normal’ commercial and contract law.
e.g. financial laissez-faire. Free banking era:
Scotland (1716–1845)
• consists of banks whose deposits are largely repayable on demand
Canada (1820–1935)
• no central bank, no supervision, no restriction on the activities of banks, and
Switzerland (1830s & 1840 - 1881)
• no state deposit insurance scheme. USA (1838-1863)
4(a) Critically examine the view that unregulated banking is better for banking
stability than regulated banking. (12 marks) ZA2013-4a
• See the subject guide, Ch5, sections on `Free banking' and `The regulation of banks'.
Approaching the question
• Unregulated (free) banking involves no regulation and no central bank providing safety net
facilities. The supporters of free banking argue that such a system is stable as banks would
need to reassure depositors under such a system by disclosing information and holding high
levels of capital. Such high levels of capital would lead to stability.
• Critics of free banking argue that such a system is inherently unstable as the nature of the
deposit contract makes banks subject to significant liquidity risk. Such liquidity risk can be
contagious leading to systemic problems in the banking system. Attempts to recover from
illiquidity (by a `re sale' of assets) could lead banks to become insolvent. Therefore, it is argued
that banks need to be regulated to provide reassurance to depositors. Banks need to be
regulated to stop them taking excessive risk and to hold sufficient capital.
13
3. (a) Explain free (unregulated) banking and discuss the advantages and disadvantages
in relation to the stability of the banking system. (13 marks) 2015-3a-ZA
Classical bank r_____=retail depositors lose confidence in their bank’s ability to remain
solvent or see problems at other banks & join a run at their bank.
• Liquidity is provided by (i) r____ deposits (ii) w_______ deposits (inter-bank & repo markets).
Banks depend heavily on wholesale market funding & securitization funding
• 2007 banking crisis showed that bank runs happened in the wholesale markets when
i_______-bank lending drains away & lenders demand higher c______________.
Banks are highly interconnected & banking system problem spread quickly. Banks are
important financial intermediaries & in underpinning economy, the consequences of 22
banking systemic failure is catastrophic. So, banks need to be regulated.
28
20075a
5(a) Discuss the arguments for bank regulation. (13 marks)
32
3(a) Discuss the reasons for and against the prudential regulation of banks. (15 marks)
2006-1a-ZA
• a balanced, essay format discussion which included the main reasons for and against prudential
which include:
– The fragility of banks – mainly due to their provision of liquidity to the financial system, that
is, vulnerability to runs.
– Systemic risk – the contagion effect exacerbated by asymmetric information.
– Depositor protection.
– The pivotal position of banks in the financial system and the social cost of bank failures.
• Main reasons that students could include which are against prudential regulation include:
– Compliance costs – both the cost of the regulator and the cost of the bank’s own compliance
with regulations.
– Reduction in competition – may lead to inefficiencies.
– Introduces moral hazard.
• Other relevant reasons and examples were rewarded with extra marks.
35
3. (a) Discuss the arguments for and against the regulation of banks. (12 marks)
38
4. (a) Discuss the arguments for and against regulating banks. (12 marks)
ZA-2012-4a
• See subject guide, pp.94–96.
Arguments for include:
1. fragility of banks
2. systemic risk
3. protection of depositors.
• Better answers will discuss the relative weights attached to the arguments for and
against and hence attempt to explain why most banking systems are regulated (i.e.
arguments for outweigh arguments against). 41
4(a) Critically examine the reasons used to explain why banks are subject to
prudential regulation. (12 marks)
2013-4a-ZB
• See the subject guide, Chapter 5, section on `Why do banks need regulations'.
Approaching the question
The three main reasons for regulation are:
1) Fragility of banks.
2) Systemic risk.
3) Protection of depositors.
• Each of these theories should be examined and discussed in terms of their importance
in understanding why banks are regulated. The key reason is the systemic risk
argument.
43
3. (a) Discuss the advantages of the prudential regulation of banks and discuss the
problems created by excessive regulation. (13 marks) 2015-3a-ZB
Each of these arguments needs to be explained. Better answers would explain there is a
trade-off between these different arguments. However, to achieve the main outcome of
lower systemic risk, some moral hazard, costs etc. have to be borne.
53
2008-3e-ZAB
3(e) What is the CAMEL system? (5 marks)
61
Dep______ Deposit insurance schemes (adopted by US & most developed countries) can protect depositors in case of
bank runs & bank panics. Depositors have less incentive to join bank run if they know their deposit is protected by
in________ an insurance scheme. Bank pays a deposit insurance premium to deposit insurance company FDIC (i.e. Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation, USA). The Fed established FDIC in 1934 due to the Great Depression bank panics.
Deposit insurance was effective in stablising the banks as the bank failure rate declined from 28.16% (in 1933) to
0.37% (in 1934)
Deposit insurance: compulsory (for Feb members) or voluntary (for non-members).
Deposit insurance limits: US$250,000 (USA), £50,000 (UK), 100,000 Euros (Jan 2011).
Deposit Insurance coverage (different % of deposits)
100%- after 2007-09 financial crisis [100% of the first £2,000 & 90% of the next £33,000 (UK, Oct 2008)
D________ by the gov to troubled institutions 63
funding (see next slides)
66
3(b) Discuss the moral hazard problems caused by the provision of ‘safety net’
arrangements for banks and examine solutions. (12 marks) 2015-3b-ZA
• See subject guide, Chapter 4, pp.98–99.
Approaching the question
• This part requires a specific discussion of the moral hazard problems caused by the safety net
arrangements for banking created by the central bank/regulator. The safety net refers to:
• i. Lender of last resort – provision of liquidity to individual banks or the system of banks in
times of shortage.
• ii. Deposit insurance – to provide compensation to depositors in the event of the failure of
bank.
• iii. Direct funding (bailing out) of troubled banks – this came more to the fore in the aftermath of
the 2007–08 crisis as governments/central banks provided capital injections to insolvent/near
insolvent banks.
• Each of these safety net arrangements needs explaining with particular emphasis on the moral
hazard created. The solutions to the problem are related to the particular nature of the safety net
arrangement (e.g. deposit insurance, co-insurance, lender of last resort, penal rates of interest
etc.). Better answers may relate the too big to fail problem with the third aspect of the safety net
arrangements.
4(a) Explain why banks are vulnerable to liquidity problems. Explain how a shortage of
liquidity in the banking system as a whole can be mitigated. (8 marks) 20104a
74
4(b) Discuss the reasons for the lender of last resort facility provided by central banks
and discuss the problems with the provision of this facility. (7 marks) 2014-4b-ZB
See subject guide, Chapter 5, section headed ‘Government safety net’, subheading ‘lender
of last resort’.
Approaching the question
This is the provision of liquidity support to banks in times of financial distress. Usually
involves swapping illiquid assets for liquid assets supplied by the central bank.
Reasons – liquidity risk is an important source of instability for banks/banking systems. At
times the banking system as a whole may run short of liquidity – this needs to be supplied
externally (as in the 2008 crisis).
In addition, individual banks may, at times, not be able to access liquidity through normal
market mechanisms. As long as the bank is still solvent it can then obtain funding from the
central bank.
Problems – creates moral hazard – countered by charging a ‘penal rate’ of interest on this
kind of support. Also, regulation can force banks to better manage their liquidity.
76
3. (a) What are the mechanisms of deposit insurance adopted in the USA and in the
UK? (4 marks) 2008-3a-ZAB
79
80
3(a) What are the mechanisms of deposit insurance adopted in the USA and in the UK? (4
marks) 20083a
4(b) Explain the role of deposit insurance in the regulation of a banking system and
discuss the solutions to the moral hazard problem created by deposit insurance. (11 marks)
20104b
• refer to pp.90–91 of the subject guide, and to pp.512– 15 (sixth edition) of Mishkin and
Eakins Financial markets and institutions.
• Deposit insurance can be used to increase depositors’ confidence in banks and hence
reduce the risk of a run developing on a bank. the recent financial crisis has
demonstrated the importance of deposit insurance in providing an underpinning of
confidence (when set at the correct level).
• Moral hazard created by deposit insurance includes:
– i. depositors having an incentive to place their deposit in high risk banks (paying the highest return)
as they are protected if the bank fails – example of Icelandic banks in the UK
– ii. bank managers having incentive to take more risk because if the worst happens then depositors’
funds are protected.
• Solutions to moral hazard include:
– for (i) co-insurance (although this has been abandoned in some countries such as the UK)
– for (ii) relate premiums for insurance to risk (as in US).
84
3(c) Examine how deposit insurance creates moral hazard problems in banking and
discuss solutions to the moral hazard created by deposit insurance. (12
• refer to pp.90–91 of the subject guide, and to pp.525–27 (sixth edition) of Mishkin and Eakins
Financial markets and institutions. 2010-3c-ZA
• Deposit insurance provides compensation to depositors in the event of a bank failure. Deposit
insurance can be used to increase depositors’ confidence in banks and hence reduce the risk of
a run developing on a bank. A very good answer would explain how the recent financial crisis has
demonstrated the importance of deposit insurance in providing an underpinning of confidence
(when set at the correct level).
Moral hazard created by deposit insurance includes:
i. depositors having an incentive to place their deposit in high-risk banks (paying the highest return)
as they are protected if the bank fails – example of Icelandic banks in the UK
ii. bank managers having incentive to take more risk because if the worst happens then depositors
funds are protected.
Solutions to moral hazard are
• for (i) co-insurance (although this has been abandoned in some countries, such as the UK)
• for (ii) relate premiums for insurance to risk (as in US). Better answers would reflect on why co-
insurance was abandoned by a number of countries during the financial crisis.
88
• Candidates should then move to the analysis of the modalities in which deposit
insurance is adopted in the USA and in the UK: 2010-3c-ZA
– Insurance may be compulsory (all the members of the Federal Reserve System
in the USA) or simply voluntary (non-members if they meet the FDIC admission
criteria) (1 mark).
– Insurance’s limit may differ widely (from $100,000 in the USA to £18,000 in the
UK) (1 mark).
– Insurance may cover different percentage of deposits (100 per cent of deposits
up to a value of $100,000 at a bank in the USA, 90 per cent of deposits to a
customer up to a maximum of £18,000 in the UK) (1 mark).
89
3(b) Discuss the role of a deposit insurance scheme within a system of bank
regulation. (10 marks) 2006-3b-ZA
• short and clear explanation of the key features of deposit insurance such as: bank pays
premium to deposit insurance scheme; depositors are compensated in event of bank
failure; it should reduce the incentive of depositors to join a run so reducing the
systemic risk. Marks were awarded for this clear definition.
• discuss how deposit insurance introduces moral hazard which has to be managed.
– Co-insurance to reduce moral hazard relating to depositors.
– Premiums related to risk to reduce moral hazard relating to bankers.
• Hence successful reduction in systemic risk requires a careful implementation of
deposit insurance to mitigate inherent moral hazard.
• Relevant example(s) of schemes were rewarded with a mark.
92
20083b
3 (b) What are the methods used to handle a failed bank in the USA? (6 marks)
3(b) What are the methods used to handle a failed bank in the USA? (6 marks)
• refer to p.73 of the subject guide. ZA-2008-3b
• The Examiners would expect excellent answers to discuss the two primary methods to handle
a US failed bank by making the following points:
– Payoff method: the FDIC pays off deposits up to the $100,000 insurance limit. After the
bank’s liquidation, then FDIC lines up with other creditors of the bank and receives its
share of the proceeds from the liquidated assets. Typically, account holders with deposits
in excess of the $100,000 limit get back more than 90 per cent (but the process can take
several years). (Up to 3 marks were awarded for making these points).
– Purchase and assumption method: the FDIC finds a merger partner who takes over all the
deposits of the failed bank (not just those under $100,000) so that no depositors lose any
money. This method has been used to implement the FDIC’s policy called ‘too big to fail’:
the big insolvent banks would get a large infusion of capital from the FDIC, who then would
find a merger partner to take over the insolvent banks and their deposits. Originally the
policy was limited to the 11 largest US banks, but has now been extended to big banks in
general. (Up to 3 marks were awarded for making these points).
96
3(c) Identify the possible solutions to the moral hazard problem arising from a system of
100% insurance of deposits. (6 marks) 20083c
98
3(c) Identify the possible solutions to the moral hazard problem arising from a system of
100 per cent insurance of deposits. (6 marks) 2008-3c-ZAB
Too-big-to-fail problem
• T___-b____- to- f____(= too-important-to-fail) was a major problem in 2007–09
financial crisis as many large banks almost collapse. Too-big-to-fail banks (or large
systemically important banks) are banks that are important within financial markets,
their failure would have a catastrophic effect on those markets.
• Solution: Government inject capital to the banks under T______ A____ R____ Program (TARP)
Eg1.US government injected $45billion each to C_____group & Bank of A__________
in exchange for the equity stake to the government.
• Eg2.UK government injected capital to L________ Group (£20.3 billion) &
R_________B_____ of S_________ (RBS) (£45.5 billion) in exchange for 41% & 84%
equity stakes respectively.
• Some institutions are too big to be allowed to fail (causes a moral hazard).
• Before the crisis, large scale meant diversification & sophistication
as a result large banks having lower capital requirements.
• Glass-Steagall Act view: large diversified institutions were beneficial due to economies
of scale & diversification.
• Since the crisis this view has been challenged & solutions have been sought for the too-big- to-fail problem
102
20083d
3(d) What is the solution to the moral hazard problem arising from the
“too big to fail” policy? (4 marks)
• refer to p.73 of the subject guide.
• the solution has been a substantial limitation of the use of the ‘too big to fail’ policy
under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA). The FDIC
must now close failed banks using the ‘least cost’ approach, thus it is more likely that
uninsured depositors will suffer losses.
• This limitation has been associated with a prompt corrective action provision. Banks are
now classified into five groups based on their capital and the FDIC has to take specific
actions if a bank falls out of the ‘well capitalised group’.
108
3(d) What is the solution to the moral hazard problem arising from the
‘too big to fail’ policy? (4 marks) 2008-3d-ZAB
4(b) Examine the ‘too big to fail problem’ in banking and discuss possible solutions to this
problem. (13 marks)
Solutions include:
i. actions to reduce the probability of failure of these institutions while leaving the size
and range of activities unchanged
ii. actions to reduce the size of these institutions or to make them less interconnected or
to separate activities within the institution
iii. actions to increase the range of resolution options, in particular to set out in advance
resolution and recovery plans (often called ‘living wills’).
113
4(b) Explain the `too big to fail problem' in relation to banking. Explain why this
has become a problem in banking and discuss solutions to this problem. (13 marks)
• See Chapter 5 of the subject guide, the section on `Too big to fail problem'. ZA2013-4b
Approaching the question
• Too-big-to-fail banks, or large systemically important banks, are banks that are considered to be so important
within financial markets that their failure would have a catastrophic effect on those markets.
• Before the crisis, though, there was a widely held view that large scale meant diversification and sophistication
and that this justified large banks having lower capital requirements. The repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act was
also partly based on the view that large diversified institutions were beneficial due to economies of scale and
diversification.
• The solution used for large distressed systemically important banks during the financial crisis was to use
government funds to provide capital injections to the banks.
• Since the crisis, this view has been challenged and solutions have been sought for the too- big-to-fail problem.
There are essentially three solutions:
• actions to reduce the probability of failure of these institutions while leaving the size and range of activities
unchanged actions to reduce the size of these institutions or to make them less interconnected or to separate
activities within the institution
• actions to increase the range of resolution options; in particular, to set out in advance resolution and recovery
plans (often called `living wills'). 115
125
i) assume risks are independent (so allow addition of the risk-weighted assets)
• But portfolio theory says risks are interdependent, therefore the overall (diversified) risk is lower than the sum of individual130
risk.
ii) all commercial loans are equally risky (i.e. all with 100% risk weight).
20073a
Q: How can bank regulation reduce the bank’s incentive to take risks? (5 marks)
• refer to page 74 of the subject guide.
• bank regulations can reduce the bank’s incentive to take risks by introducing
restrictions on asset holding and bank capital requirements.
• the mechanisms used by banks to achieve this objective:
1. restrictions on holding risky assets (i.e. ordinary shares (UK)= common stocks (US)
2. limitations on the amount of loans, in particular the categories of the individual borrowers
3. reduction of the risk of the loan portfolio by diversification
4. maintenance of a sufficient level of bank capital
133
3. (a) How can bank regulation reduce the bank’s incentive to take risks? (5m)
• refer to page 74 of the subject guide. 2007-3a-ZAB
• An outstanding answer to this question would state that bank regulations can
reduce the bank’s incentive to take risks by introducing restrictions on asset holding
and bank capital requirements (1 mark). In particular, the answer would then need
to indicate the mechanisms used by banks to achieve this objective:
① restrictions on holding risky assets (i.e. ordinary shares, known in the USA as
common stocks) (1 mark)
② limitations on the amount of loans, in particular the categories of the individual
borrowers (1 mark)
③ reduction of the risk of the loan portfolio by diversification (1 mark)
④ maintenance of a sufficient level of bank capital (1 mark).
135
138
141
4. (a) Define what a bank’s capital is and explain why bank capital is important in
protecting depositors from loss. (8 marks) 2010-4a-ZA
• refer to p.92 of the subject guide, and to pp.433–34 (sixth edition) of Mishkin and
Eakins Financial markets and institutions.
• Bank capital is essentially shareholders’ funds or assets less deposit claims. It
provides a buffer to absorb losses made by the bank and thus protects depositor
claims from a reduction in value. A good answer would examine the differences
between the various definitions of capital including tier 1, core tier 1, tier 2 etc.
• An example to illustrate the buffer role played by capital would be rewarded with
additional marks.
144
5(a) Explain what capital is and discuss the reasons why regulators place emphasis on
banks maintaining adequate capital. ( 12marks) ZA-2006-5a
• definition of capital (or assets less deposit liabilities). It can also be defined as
shareholders funds (share capital and accumulated reserves) plus long-term debt
(subordinated loans).
• Students are then expected to explain that capital protects a bank against
insolvency, and to give a definition of insolvency as the prospective inability of a
bank to meet all of its liabilities. Hence if the value of assets reduced, capital will
absorb loss by reducing in value. Students should also explain that the
consequence is that shareholders bear risk of loss and depositors funds are
unaffected. The greater the capital held the more protection of depositors funds –
regulators identify capital adequacy in relation to credit risk (risk-assets ratio),
market risk and under Basel 2, operational risk.
147
• The gearing ratio is the amount of deposits and external liabilities divided
by the bank’s total capital and reserves. 20073b
• Gearing ratio = 3 (=75/25).
• i) Risk-weighted assets are:
Cash (20*0%) £0
Government bills (10*0%) £0
Loans (70*100%) £70
Total £70
• ii) Risk–asset ratio = 25/70 = 35.7%
151
ZA-2007-3b
3 (b) Consider bank ABC that has the following balance sheet:
153
The gearing ratio is the amount of deposits and external liabilities divided by the bank’s
total capital and reserves. ZA-2007-3b
Gearing ratio = 4.3 (=65/15).
i. Risk-weighted assets are:
• Cash (20*0%) £0
• Government bills (10*0%) £0
• Loans (50*100%) £50
Total £50
155
Q: Explain the risk-assets ratio under Basel 1 and discuss the main problems that have
been identified with it. How will it change under Basel2 ? (13 marks) 20073c
• Students should then discuss the main problems associated with the risk–assets ratio under
Basel 1: ZA-2007-3c
– 100% risk weight applied to all commercial non-bank loans. This implies that it does not
reward diversification (1 mark)
– relative risk weights may not reflect relative risks – can also lead to misallocation of
resources (1 mark)
– assumption of independence of risks (1 mark).
• Students should finally explain that under ‘The New Basel Capital Accord’ (so-called Basel
2, effective from the end of 2006), although no change is envisaged for the definition of
capital, and the minimum capital coefficient of 8% is also to remain unchanged, several
changes have been introduced with regard to the credit risk assessment. In particular, the
present risk–asset ratio will be modified by separating loans into different classes according
to their risk measured by credit ratings from rating agencies. This overcomes the problem
with the current risk–asset ratio, which treats all loans as equally risky (2 marks).
162
5(d) Explain the risk-assets ratio under Basel 1 and discuss the main problems that have
been identified with it. How will it change under Basel 2? (13 marks) 20085d
• Risk-assets ratio is the ratio of capital to risk adjusted assets
• explain the risk-assets ratio under Basel 1.
– Capital is divided into tier 1 (issued share capital and disclosed accumulated reserves) and tier 2 (medium- and
long-term subordinated debt + general provisions and unpublished profits)
– The value of each category of asset is risk adjusted in a crude way according to its exposure to credit risk. Risk
weights of 0, 20%, 50% and 100% are used. Off balance sheet items are also converted to credit equivalents
and then risk weighted
– The minimum ratio required by Basil 1 is 8%
– Individually negotiated with regulator
• the main problems associated to the risk–assets ratio under Basel 1:
– 100% risk weight is applied to all commercial non-bank loans. This implies that it does not reward diversification
– Relative risk weights may not reflect relative risks and can also lead to misallocation of resources
– Assumption of independence of risks
• under ‘The New Basel Capital Accord’ (so-called Basel 2, effective from the end of 2006), although no change is
envisaged for the definition of capital, and the minimum capital co-efficient of 8 per cent is also to remain unchanged,
several changes have been introduced as regards the credit risk assessment. In particular, the present risk–asset
ratio will be modified by separating loans into different classes according to their risk measured by credit ratings from
rating agencies. This overcomes the problem with the current risk–asset ratio, which treats all loans as equally 164risky.
5(d) Explain the risk-assets ratio under Basel 1 and discuss the main problems that
have been identified with it. How will it change under Basel 2? (13 marks) 2008-5d-ZAB
• refer to pp.75–76 of the subject guide.
• Candidates should begin by showing that they understand that riskassets ratio is the ration of
capital to risk adjusted assets (1 mark).
• Candidates are then expected to explain the risk-assets ratio under Basel 1. The Examiners
would be expecting points to be made such as:
– Capital is divided into tier 1 (issued share capital and disclosed accumulated reserves)
and tier 2 (medium- and long-term subordinated debt + general provisions and
unpublished profits) (2 marks are awarded for this).
– The value of each category of asset is risk adjusted in a crude way according to its
exposure to credit risk. Risk weights of 0, 20%, 50% and 100% are used. Off balance
sheet items are also converted to credit equivalents and then risk weighted (3 marks).
– An additional 2 marks are awarded if examples are given. The minimum ratio required by
Basil 1 is 8% (1 mark).
– Individually negotiated with regulator (1 mark).
167
Candidates should then discuss the main problems associated to the risk–assets ratio
under Basel 1: 2008-5d-ZAB
– 100% risk weight is applied to all commercial non-bank loans. This implies that it
does not reward diversification (1 mark was awarded for this).
– Relative risk weights may not reflect relative risks and can also lead to
misallocation of resources (1 mark was awarded for this).
– Assumption of independence of risks (1 mark was awarded for this).
• Candidates should finally explain that under ‘The New Basel Capital Accord’ (so-
called Basel 2, effective from the end of 2006), although no change is envisaged for
the definition of capital, and the minimum capital co-efficient of 8 per cent is also to
remain unchanged, several changes have been introduced as regards the credit risk
assessment. In particular, the present risk–asset ratio will be modified by separating
loans into different classes according to their risk measured by credit ratings from
rating agencies. This overcomes the problem with the current risk–asset ratio, which
treats all loans as equally risky. (2 marks were awarded for this).
168
3(b) Explain how the risk assets’ ratio under Basel 1 was constructed and discuss
the problems with this construction. (10 marks)
ZA-20111a
• answers will discuss these problems in terms of how important they are and how
they impacted on banking.
171
4(b) Explain the risk assets ratio introduced under the Basel 1 capital adequacy regime
and outline the main problems with this Basel 1 ratio. (9 marks)
• refer to pp.93–94 of the subject guide, and to pp.516–17 (sixth edition) of Mishkin and Eakins
Financial markets and institutions.
• A starting point for answering this question is to define the risk assets ratio (RAR). The RAR =
Capital / Sum of risk weighted assets. 2010-4b-ZA
• Capital is made up of tier 1 and tier 2 capital. These need to be defined.
• Risk weighted assets are the asset value multiplied by a weight reflecting relative credit risk. So,
cash would have zero weight, government bonds 20%, mortgages 50% and commercial loans
100%.
• Better answers would emphasise that the risk being assessed here is credit risk and this risk
appears both on and off the balance sheet.
• The minimum RAR is 8%. The main problems with the RAR under Basel 1 are:
1. assumes risks are independent therefore no benefit from diversification
2. all commercial loans are given 100% risk weight
3. relative risk weights may not accurately reflect relative weights and my distort asset allocation.
Better answers would illustrate each of these problems with an example. 174
5(b) Explain the risk-assets ratio under Basel 1 and discuss the main problems that have
been identified with it. ( 13marks) 2006-5b-ZA
• showing that they understand that risk assets ratio is the ration of capital to risk adjusted assets.
• Students are then expected to explain the risk-assets ratio under Basel 1. The Examiners would be
expecting points to be made such as:
• Capital is divided into tier 1 (issued share capital and disclosed accumulated reserves) and tier 2
(medium- and long term subordinated debt and general provisions and unpublished profits). The
value of each category of asset is risk adjusted in a crude way according to its exposure to credit
risk. Risk weights of 0, 20 per cent, 50 per cent and 100 per cent are used. Off balance sheet items
also converted to credit equivalents and then risk weighted. Additional marks are awarded if
examples are given. The minimum ratio required by Basil 1 is 8 per cent. Individually negotiated with
regulator.
• discuss the main problems associated to the risk assets ratio under Basel 1:
– 100 per cent risk weight applied to all commercial non-bank loans. This implies that it does not
reward diversification.
– Relative risk weights may not reflect relative risks – can also lead to misallocation of resources.
– Assumption of independence of risks.
177
3(c) Explain the changes to the construction of the risk assets’ ratio under Basel 2 & and discuss to
what extent the changes address the problems with the Basel 1 construction.(8 marks)
ZA-20111a
180
• These requirements (except for 8) will be phased between 201__ -201__ to allow banks to
increase their capital without harming economic recovery from the financial crisis.
• Common equity will go up from 2% under Basel 2 to _____% (4.5% + 2.5%).
• In normal times banks will operate on a 7% ratio. Banks can reduce the capital conservation
buffer towards zero & minimum common equity ratio towards 4.5% when financial stress.
under Basel 3, regulators emphase greater on common equity to protect banks from
financial stress. The procyclicality problem is addressed by (4) & (5). 188
2) Tier ____ equity = common equity + more strictly defined capital instruments – preferred stock
risk weighted assets
3) Total capital >____% T____________ capital = Tier 1 + Tier 2 capital
risk weighted assets (no change compared to Basel 2)
4) Capital conservation buffer Banks need to build capital during ‘good times’ for bad times (i.e.
(2.5% of risk weighted assets) & is made up of procyclicality problem) Restricting banks from paying dividends as capital
common equity. approaches the minimum requirements to enforce buffer.
5) National regulators impose an when credit growth excessively & a build-up of system-wide risk Can release
additional 2.5% capital buffer this capital buffer during the downswing to enable banks to continue lending
(= countercyclical capital b________).
6) To increase c_________ r_____________ i.e. too-big-to-fail problem
for large systemically important banks
7) use non-risk based leverage ratio (as a This will guard against banks increasing lending excessively where this is
‘backstop’). Tier 1 capital to total assets (3%). not picked up by the risk-based measures. 191
8) Higher capital requirements for market risk implemented in 2011
3(b) Discuss the main changes to the assessment of capital adequacy of banks
proposed under Basel 3. (13 marks)
See subject guide, pp.104–06. 20123b
The main changes introduced by Basel 3 are:
1. Common equity (defined as ordinary or common shares plus retained earnings) should form a
greater part of Tier 1 capital. There will be a minimum common equity to risk weighted assets
ratio of 4.5%.
2. Tier 1 equity (made up of common equity plus other more strictly defined capital instruments –
mainly preferred stock) to risk weighted assets must be greater than 6% (compared to 4%
under Basel 2).
3. Total capital (Tier 1 plus Tier 2 capital) to risk weighted assets must be greater than 8% (no
change compared to Basel 2).
4. A capital conservation buffer equal to 2.5% of risk weighted assets and made up of common
equity. This buffer will allow banks to build up capital during ‘good times’ which can then be
drawn on in times of financial stress.
5. In addition, national regulators will be able to impose an additional 2.5% capital buffer when
credit growth is judged to be excessive and there is a build-up of system-wide risk (this is
known as a countercyclical capital buffer).
6. National regulators will also have further discretion to increase capital requirements for large
systemically important banks (to address the too-big-to-fail problem).
• Better answers would discuss these changes, in particular, explaining why they were 195
introduced.
4(c) Discuss the reasons for the proposed changes in capital regulation under Basel 3.
(12 marks) 2014-4c-ZB
See subject guide, Ch 5, section headed ‘The financial crisis and Basel 3’.
Approaching the question
The main changes are:
i. Greater emphasis on core capital (quality of capital).
ii. Increase in capital.
iii. Counter-cyclicality in capital requirements through buffer built up in ‘good times’.
iv. Use of leverage ratio as a ‘backstop’ to risk assets ratio.
v. Greater monitoring of liquidity and more prescription of liquidity requirements.
Better answers will discuss the reasons for the introduction of these changes (related to
lessons learnt from the 2008 crisis).
197
205
5(c) Discuss the monitoring of liquidity in banking, with particular reference to the UK. (5 marks)
208
213
225
4(b) Discuss the importance of disclosure in relation to bank regulation. (10 marks)
233
4. (a) With reference to examples discuss the relationship between bank regulation
and financial crises. (15 marks) 20111a
• Not directly covered in the subject guide but better students will be able to
• relate the material on regulation in Chapter 5 to financial crises such as the recent
banking crisis.