Surname 1

Institution Affiliation

Students Name

Course

Date

Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainability Accounting and Reporting: A Study of

Australian Local Councils

1.0 Findings

1.1 Australian local Councils functions

 They focus on business choices and actions that can influence and be acknowledged, by

way of materiality matrices or explanations of relationship activities, to represent

sustainability reports.

 They aimed to give practitioners and scholars realistic consequences. When the

stakeholders are concerned, it is necessary to be mindful of the urgency and need to

follow the best organization's practices.

 Their level of commitment will lead to a cooperative market climate, inspire and reward

crucial improvements in decision making and processes and make them more socially

and environmentally friendly.

 To analyze and forecast the best kinds of partnerships and involvements between

organizations, we need to think about the importance of company interaction with the

community in coordinating its stakeholders' needs and creating value for society.
 Surname 2

1.2 Overview

 This research established the relevance of participation of stakeholders in the whole

sustainability and reporting phase, strategic plan implementation and sustainability

criteria, sustainability assessment, and reporting.

 This research promotes awareness and the two core contributions to stakeholder

involvement. The first is analytical and uses a matrix of communication methods

extracted from the findings of the reviewed GRI papers.

 The findings also strengthen arguments addressed in stakeholder and corporate social

responsibility literature[ CITATION Kau18 \l 1033 ]. It is considered the priority of

primary stakeholders to the detriment of secondary stakeholders in their processes and

practices.

 During the distribution of activities of the company such as in the case discussed here in

the sustainable studies, energy firms established more strategic actions for greater quality

interaction with external stakeholders[ CITATION Kau18 \l 1033 ], which, based on the

social background in which they operate, are primarily related to their external influence

and dependency. It is worth noting that most energy firms work in heavily controlled

markets and have a civil, economic, and environmental responsibility of considerable

importance to external actors.

1.3 Sustainability accounting and reporting process

 These findings reinforce the consolidated monitoring process for sustainability

assessment and communication as described in Section 3. The implementation programs

presented the action plans to deal with these challenges, and a resource policy allotted

funding to execute the action plans in council A listed local environmental

 Surname 3

issues[ CITATION Kau18 \l 1033 ]. The accounting system then identified sustainability

metrics and reported real results to assess achievement or lack of programs. In the other

two councils, knowledge about their viability is measured and communicated through

related pathways.

 The main issue about the participation of these transitional communities in Councils B

and C was establishing an effective touch channel. In contrast, transitional communities

lack touchpoints to provide input and receive input, as tenants whose home contacts are

readily accessible.

 There were councilors and mayors in another transient stakeholder community who

controlled the planning process and results of the three municipal councils. They also

greatly affected urban planning challenges and the financing of Council programs'

approvals.

 They were considered leaders of local voices, but at times councilors overshadowed the

consensus of the city. However, the stakeholder party was temporary since their role was

restricted to a set election period, and the councilors were not elected for the following

term unknown.

 The interviewed participants noted that because of the transient existence of this body,

the council had various councilors with different aspirations for the area[ CITATION

Kau18 \l 1033 ]. Interestingly, though many stakeholders have been listed and prioritized

by the Councils, they are mostly people. The idea of proximity makes it possible to view

the physical world as an essential player.

 These results emphasize that a much larger awareness of stakeholders and a need for

interaction with them is based on the public sector background. However, the fact that a
 Surname 4

capital plan inevitably affects sustainable accountability and reporting suggests that

economic obstacles will override councils' goal of engaging with their stakeholders. A

review of the effective participation practices of stakeholders describes how stakeholders

play a part in accounting for and reporting sustainability.

1.4 Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainability Planning

 The three councils implemented comprehensive communication programs to identify and

address the needs and concerns of stakeholders. Council A has implemented a

commitment to recognize the local community's existing issues and needs (Council A's

Research Report 2012).

 The results from the involvement of stakeholders in sustainable planning offer a

descriptive overview of how stakeholders participate in sustainable development. The

interviews demonstrated the involvement of external partners close-range (about space

knowledge and biodiversity issues and ideas)[ CITATION Kau18 \l 1033 ], including the

local population, offered advantages for councils to address their sustainability impacts

proactively.

 Thereby, constructive control of close partners was structural, allowing the Councils at

the early stage of the sustainable accountability and monitoring process to communicate

with legitimate stakeholders. In the sustainable planning cycle, there was also a focus on

strength and urgency. Initially, powerful players like senior management set the agenda

for genuine stakeholders to participate.

 This commitment assisted the councilors. Likewise, the local government has been

urgently expected to deliver strategic proposals in a fair amount of time, as some

interviewees have emphasized[ CITATION Kau18 \l 1033 ]. It affected the strategic

 Surname 5

strategies to provide input on customers, ensuring these problems should be resolved in a

fair amount of time.

1.5 Stakeholder Engagement In Sustainability Accounting

 In summary, feedback from internal and external stakeholders was required for the

sustainability assessment process on a timely basis. Internal stakeholders use in-house

information systems to provide sustainability results. Outside actors, including regulatory

bodies, supplied sustainability data collected by their accounting systems to calculate

qualitative metrics using perception-based data.

 The results concerning the importance of stakeholder involvement in sustainability

accounting are consistent with the theory of managerial stakeholders. In this phase of the

sustainability accounting and reporting process[ CITATION Kau18 \l 1033 ], the internal

stakeholders became more involved, despite some middle and top management

understanding gaps. To reach a consensus on environmental measures, however, the local

population was contacted.

 The overriding characteristics of stakeholder control and urgency were the importance of

stakeholders' participation in this sustainability reporting and accountability process.

Input from the commitment of local stakeholders (local communities) in developing

sustainable plans and benchmarks seemed to take the lead in accounting and assimilating

sustainability information.

 After feedback was received, the influence and urgent needs of stakeholders were taken

into account. In assessing sustainable success assessment methods, "strengthy" internal

stakeholders and regulators have guided their decision-making mechanism through their

urgently necessary attributes[ CITATION Kau18 \l 1033 ]. In Council C, the effect of

 Surname 6

temporary members such as the mayor and the councilors has reduced participation in

local communities' overall sustainability accounting process.

1.6 Stakeholder Engagement In Sustainability Reporting

 To sum up, by the philosophy of the management stakeholder, internal and external

stakeholders participated in the mechanism of reporting on sustainability, driven by the

influence, proximity, and credibility qualities of the stakeholders. Still, there were strong

gaps between the three councils' participation. The involvement of particular actors such

as internal members and technical associations was more beneficial (reporting

adjudicators).

 Given the intermittent and routine nature of the sustainability reporting, the urgent

characteristics were not important in this phase of the reporting process.

 Before the final sustainability reporting, engagement with close partners such as the local

sector was not helpful to Council A and Council B[ CITATION Kau18 \l 1033 ].

However, Council C has perceived advantages of developing sustainable reporting from

collaborating actively with the city. Since sustainable reporting was established, not all

stakeholders recognized the tradition of involving stakeholders in the sustainability

reporting.

 Although councils tried to improve their environmental reports for valid partners such as

the local government, they did obtain no feedback. The involvement of relevant

stakeholders, such as adjudicators, was more valuable.

References
 Surname 7

Kaur, Amanpreet, and Sumit Lodhia. "Stakeholder engagement in sustainability accounting and

reporting." Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal (2018).