CHAPTER THREE
TO THE FATHER, THROUGH THE
SON, IN THE SPIRIT
‘The first time I met Abbot Ambrose Verheul T complimented
hhim on his book Introduction fo the Liturgy, the outline of which
followed for my course. He was abashed but he managed to
declare detachedly, almost dismissively, “It is a good book.” We
‘met a couple of times in his Abbey of Mont-César, the monastery
of Lambert Beauduin, to discuss a possible publications tie-up
between his abbey and the Pontifical Liturgical Institute. Sadly, the
project did not materialize. And so in 1963 Adrien Nocent and I
Started the Institute's periodical Eccles Orans. It was a dauntless
fact for an institute that needed to publish or else perish in the
‘estimation ofthe liturgical academe.
‘The plan ofthis chapter follows closely the book of Verheul, but
have added to the content the result of my years of entanglement
With the awe-inspiring mystery of the Blessed Trinity that is at
‘work in Christian worship.
Uturgy Is Encounter with God
“And so, what is liturgy?” Verheul defines it as encounter
‘between God and the worshiping assembly. The Latin etymology of
“encounter” (inand con) isnot sympathetic othe wse ofthis word
{in the liturgy, or theology, for that matter. Nor so are the different
‘meanings English dictionaries give to it. a meeting between hostile
factions; sudden, often violent, clash such asa military encounter;
an unexpected or chance face-to-face meeting; and a coming to the
Vicinity by a celestial being, asin the title of the lm Clase Encounters
of the Third Kind, But after Edward Schllebeeckx’s book was
‘ranalated into English in 1971 under the ttle Chris, the Sacrament108 What. Then Is Liturgy?
ofthe Encounter with Go, hostity, violence, or chance meeting gave
‘way to a new lexical use that stressed harmony, mutual expect,
and love. Today there is a popular seminar program for marred
‘couples called Marriage Encounter.
‘The phrase “encounter with God” implies a number of things
Encourter is the personal act of the individual worshipers that
together constitute the itugical assembly. The assembly is not
mantle under which individuals can settle quietly with one’s heart
‘ot being in the Liturgical action that is taking
of community worship cannot be gauged merely on the surface
of active participation. It suffers when the individual persons are
‘not interiorly involved, when ther hearts do not burn within them
4s they listen tothe word of God, and when they do not perceive
the presence of Christ in the breaking ofthe bread. in reality only
God knows the true quality of liturgical worship, because God
alone can read the heart and mind of each person. The tool for
active participation are nothing more than external aid to bing to
realization the individual person's encounter with God. After we
have performed the liturgy tothe best of our ability, we can only
hopethatit deserved fll marks for “achieving human sanctification
and God's glorification, the end to which all the Church’ other
activities are directed” (C10).
‘Our encounter with God inthe liturgy is personal also inasmuch
45 we encounter the persons ofthe Holy Trinity. When Christians
pray they do not address a Supreme Being or Divine Entity: they
Pray to God sho revealed himself as a Trinity of Persons. That is
hy liturgical worship is addressed to the three Divine Persons
‘The invocation “God” may give the wrong impression that we are
calling upon some unnamed divine being, but inthe liturgy “God”
isthe Father of Our Lord Jesus Christ. We address our worship to
‘he Father, through Jesus Chis, in the unity ofthe Holy Spirit. The
ancient doxelogial formula phvases this succinetly: Ad Patrem, per
Flu, in Sprta Sacto. The formula expresses the final phase of
salvation history, which i the liturgy Tt describes what takes place