You are on page 1of 7

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

DOI 10.1007/s00590-007-0221-5

O R I G I N A L A R T I CL E

Development of a molecular methodology to quantify


Staphylococcus epidermidis in surgical wash-out samples
from prosthetic joint replacement surgery
Fergus J. Byrne · Sinéad M. Waters · Peadar S. Waters ·
William Curtin · Michael Kerin

Received: 4 December 2006 / Accepted: 11 January 2007


© Springer-Verlag 2007

Abstract Prosthetic joint infection is a serious complica- not identiWed in any of these samples using the novel spe-
tion of total joint arthroplasty that causes great morbidity in cies speciWc SYBR Green real time PCR technique. Results
aVected individuals. The most common cause of prosthesis indicated that wash-out samples were true negatives and
associated infections are members of Staphylococcus spp., did not harbour S. epidermidis. To support this, patients
including Staphylococcus epidermidis. Culture has served displayed no symptoms of infection. To illustrate the full
as the gold standard for diagnosis, despite obvious short- eVectiveness of the novel real time PCR assay, a larger
comings in terms of sensitivity and time. Bacterial genomic number of samples need to be tested (>1,000 patients).
DNA extraction methodologies were evaluated for optimal
recovery of genomic DNA from sterilised wash-out sam- Keywords Staphylococcus epidermidis · Real time PCR ·
ples, spiked with S. epidermidis. Real time Polymerase Bacterial infection · Prosthesis · Joint replacement
chain reaction (PCR) assays targeting the S. epidermidis
speciWc gseA gene were designed to reliably detect and
quantify S. epidermidis. Sixty post-operative wash-out Mise au point d’une méthode moléculaire pour
samples from primary hip and knee arthroplasties were quantiWer le staphylocoque epidermidis dans les
taken aseptically. All were shown to be culture negative produits de lavage en chirurgie prothétique
using the culture-dependent approach. These were samples
were subjected to S. epidermidis-speciWc real time PCR. Résumé L'infection prothétique est une complication
Standard curve showed good linearity. Sensitivity limit of sérieuse des arthroplasties totales et entraîne une grande
the assay was <10 CFU S. epidermidis per sample. Repro- morbidité chez les patients qui en sont atteints La cause la
ducibility of the assay was conWrmed. S. epidermidis was plus commune des infections liées aux prothèses sont dues
à diverses espèces de staphylocoques, y compris le staphy-
F. J. Byrne (&) · W. Curtin locoque epidermidis. La culture a servi de gold standard au
Orthopaedics Department, diagnostic, en dépit des imperfections évidentes en termes
Merlin Park Regional Hospital, Galway, Ireland de sensibilité et de temps. Des méthodologies géniquo-bac-
e-mail: fergbyrne@gmail.com
tériennes d'extraction d'ADN ont été évaluées pour le réta-
S. M. Waters blissement optimal de l'ADN génique des échantillons
Teagasc, Animal Reproduction Research Centre, stérilisés de lavage, inoculés avec le staphylocoque epide-
Mellows Campus, Athenry, Co., Galway, Ireland rmidis. Des analyses en temps réel de PCR visant le gène
P. S. Waters
spéciWque du gseA du staphylocoque epidermidis ont été
National University of Ireland, conçues pour détecter de façon certaine et pour quantiWer le
Galway, Ireland staphylocoque epidermidis. Soixante échantillons de produit
e-mail: peadarwaters@nuigalway.ie de lavage pour des arthroplasties primaires de hanche et de
M. Kerin
genou ont été prélevés aseptiquement. Toutes les cultures
Department of Surgery, Clinical Science Institute, ont été trouvées stériles en utilisant l'approche culture-
University College Hospital, Galway, Ireland dépendante. Des échantillons ont été soumis à une analyse

123
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

en temps réel de PCR au staphylocoque epidermidis. La geting the 16S rRNA gene using PCR [9]. The following
courbe standard a montré de bonnes linéarités. La limite de species have been identiWed using this approach, S. epide-
sensibilité de l'analyse était inférieure à CFU staphylocoque rmidis [1], S. aureus [2] and methicillin-resistant Staphylo-
epidermidis:prélèvement. La reproductibilité de l'analyse a cocci [20], to name but a few. However, the use of primers
été conWrmée. Le staphylocoque epidermidis n'a pas été targeting the 16S rRNA gene has been associated with a
retrouvé dans l'un quelconque d'entre ces échantillons en high prevalence of false positive results [21]. The broad
utilisant la technique nouvelle spéciWque SYBR en temps sensitivity of PCR directed against the 16S rRNA detects
réel de PCR. Les résultats ont indiqué que les produits de even trace contamination by clinically irrelevant organisms
lavage étaient réellement négatifs et ne contenaient pas du that occur after specimen acquisition. One way to improve
staphylocoque epidermidis.. Les patients n'ont d'ailleurs the speciWcity of PCR is to use primers targeting a fragment
montré aucun symptôme d'infection, ce qui conforte cette of gene, speciWc to the species of interest.
aYrmation. Pour illustrer la pleine eYcacité de l'analyse en Another issue of concern in the development of sensitive
temps réel du nouveau test PCR, un plus grand nombre PCR assays for microbial detection includes the identiWca-
d'échantillons doit être examiné (patients >1000). tion of an optimal method of DNA isolation from samples.
Optimal sample processing protocols for diagnostic bacte-
Mots clés Staphylocoque epidermidis · rial PCR should release DNA from an array of target organ-
PCR en temps réel · Infection bactérienne · Prothèse · isms with equal eYciencies and washout inhibitory factors
Arthroplastie from various sample types without introducing bacterial
DNA contamination to the ampliWcation reaction. Extrac-
tion and PCR ampliWcation of DNA from synovial Xuid is
Introduction recognised to be diYcult. The complex macromolecular
composition of the synovial matrix is claimed to be respon-
Bacterial colonisation or deep infections of the prosthesis or sible for PCR inhibition and false negative results when
its site are major concerns with a potentially catastrophic using bacterial-speciWc PCR for the diagnosis of synovial
outcome [19]. The most commonly cultured microorgan- infection [13, 16]. Indeed, recent attempts to detect bacte-
isms associated with prosthetic joint infection are coagulase- rial DNA in samples from equine patients with infectious
negative staphylococci (in 30–43% of cases) and Staphylo- synovitis were overall not successful [16].
coccus aureus (12–23%), followed by mixed Xora (10– Real-time PCR is based on the detection and quantitation
11%), streptococci (9–10%), Gram-negative bacilli (3–6%), of a Xuorescent reporter during PCR and is extremely sensi-
enterococci (3–7%) and anaerobes (2–4%). However, tive [12]. The Wrst and only report in the literature of real
Staphylococcus epidermidis, a coagulase-negative staphylo- time PCR being applied in the detection of infection in
cocci and ubiquitous skin commensal, has emerged as a orthopaedics was made by Kobayashi et al. [10]. This
causative agent in prosthetic joint infection [19]. These bac- group developed a real time PCR methodology for the
teria are a major component of the normal skin Xora and identiWcation of bacteria in culture-negative osteomyelitis,
mucous membranes and they are among the most frequently however this assay was not species-speciWc nor fully quan-
isolated bacteria in the clinical microbiology laboratory [15]. titative. The aim of the present study was to develop a
Cultures of periprosthetic tissue provide the most reli- rapid, reliable sensitive and reproducible real time PCR
able current means of detecting these pathogens and as method to detect S. epidermidis in surgical wash-out samples
such, culture has served as the gold standard for identiWca- from prosthetic joint replacement surgery.
tion of these organisms despite obvious shortcomings in
terms of sensitivity and time. Conventional culture methods
may require several days to obtain a Wnal result and the use Methods
of pre-operative antibiotics may render conventional cul-
tures negative. The existence of ‘culture negative’ osteomy- Sample collection
elitis has been reported previously [5].
To overcome the shortcomings associated with the diag- Wash-out samples consisted of 0.9% saline and were sam-
nosis of bacterial infections in orthopaedics by culture and ples of the Wrst wash after reduction of prosthesis. Sixty
to reduce the number of infected revision arthroplasties, (2 £ 40 ml2) samples of post-operative wash-out samples
molecular methodologies have been employed [14]. Molec- from primary hip and knee arthroplasties were taken using
ular diagnostics relies on the presence of bacterial DNA. aseptic technique in 50 ml sterilin tubes and stored at
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods have been ¡20°C. One of the duplicate samples was subjected to rou-
extensively applied in orthopaedics to identify bacterial tine culture-based clinical microbiological analyses while
infection [14]. Bacterial presence may be detected by tar- the remaining sample was tested using molecular methods.

123
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

Optimisation of DNA isolation from Staphylococcus at 6,000 rpm for 10 min using a MSE Mistral 1000 centri-
epidermidis from orthopaedic surgical wash-out samples fuge (Shaw ScientiWc Ltd., Dublin, Ireland).
The extraction procedure using the Wizard Bacterial
In order to simulate S. epidermidis contaminated wash-out Genomic DNA isolation kit (Promega) according to manu-
samples, washout from a surgical operation was sterilised facturer’s instructions proved most eVective at extracting
and was subsequently spiked with known concentrations of the highest quality and quantity of DNA. As such, DNA
a pure culture of S. epidermidis. In brief, 1 l of wash-out was isolated from all cultures using this technique in
matrix was obtained from a patient displaying no signs of molecular studies.
infection and was sterilised by radiation. Sterilisation was Oligonucleotide primers (Sigma-Genosys, Cambridge,
conWrmed by culture-based analyses. S. epidermidis ATCC UK), 5⬘Staph Epi F and 3⬘Staph Epi R (Table 1) were
8558 was purchased from the American Type Culture Col- designed using the software programme ‘Primer3’, avail-
lection, USA, revitalised and cultured according to manu- able online at http://www.gene3.ciat.cgiar.org/PRIMER3/
facturers instructions. The identity of the strain was primer3_www.cgi to amplify a 193 bp region of the S. epi-
conWrmed following culture by api test analysis (Bio Meri- dermidis speciWc gene, which codes for the glutamic acid-
eux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France). This was performed to ensure speciWc serine protease, GluSE [8]. Sequence analysis
no contamination occurred during culture. Serial dilutions using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST),
of an overnight culture of S. epidermidis was carried out online at the National Centre for Biotechnology Informa-
and a 100 l aliquot of each dilution was plated in triplicate tion (NCBI) homepage (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov),
on nutrient agar at 30°C under aerobic conditions for 24 h conWrmed the species speciWcity of these primers.
for subsequent quantiWcation. Triplicate 100 l aliquots of DNA from S. epidermidis, S. aureus and S. auricularis
the undiluted culture were stored at ¡20°C for spiking of was subjected to S. epidermidis-speciWc PCR using the oli-
sterile washout. Tripicate 1 ml samples of sterile wash-out gonucleotide primers designed in this study and listed in
samples were spiked to contain 1 £ 109, 1 £ 106, 1 £ 103 Table 1.
and 0 CFU S. epidermidis, respectively. To reduce the possibility of false positive results, PCR
Spiked wash-out samples were subjected to the Wve reagents were subjected to 5 min exposure to UV irradia-
DNA extraction methods listed below. tion prior to this work being carried out and reactions were
formulated in a laminar Xow.
1. Standard phenol/chloroform puriWcation method fol-
Polymerase chain reaction reactions (100 l), performed
lowed by an ethanol precipitation [17].
in a DNA thermal cycler (Perkin Elmer Cetus, Wellesley,
2. Protocol as described by Kuipers et al. [11].
MA, USA) contained 500 ng genomic DNA, 10£
3. Wizard Bacterial Genomic DNA isolation kit (Pro-
(NH4)2SO4 reaction buVer (10 l), MgCl2 (3 mM), primers
mega, Madison, WI, USA).
(500 ng each) and deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs)
4. Qiagen DNA mini kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA,
(500 M each). Taq DNA polymerase (Bioline™, London,
USA)–a silica-gel column-based method.
UK) (2 U) was added following the initial denaturation
5. Sigma Bacterial DNA isolation kit (Sigma-Aldrich Ire-
step.
land Ltd., Dublin, Ireland).
The PCR ampliWcation programme was: 94°C for 2 min,
For all protocols tested, DNA was eluted in 100 l of 84°C for 5 min (to allow the addition of Taq DNA poly-
Nuclease-free H2O (Promega). DNA was subsequently merase) and 35 cycles of 93°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, 72°C
assessed for optimal DNA recovery. QuantiWcation and for 30 s, followed by 10 min at 72°C.
purity assessment of DNA was conducted using a Shima- Analysis of ampliWed PCR products (10 l) was carried
dzu 160-A ultraviolet (UV) spectrophotometer (Shimadzu out on 1% (w/v) agarose gels using 1£ Tris acetate EDTA
ScientiWc Instruments Inc., Columbia, MD, USA). (TAE) running buVer, pH 8.3 in a model EC-360-M Maxi-
cell gel system (EC apparatus Corporation, St. Petersburg,
QuantiWcation of S. epidermidis in wash-out samples FL, USA).
using real time PCR

Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 8558 was cultured Table 1 Primer sequences for Staphylococcus epidermidis-speciWc
PCR
overnight according to manufacturers instructions. Closely
related bacteria, S. aureus ATCC 29313, Staphylococcus Primer designation Sequence
auricularis ATCC 33753, were also cultured overnight
5⬘Staph Epi F 5⬘GGCAAATTTGTGGGTCAAGA3⬘
according to manufacturer’s instructions and were applied
3⬘Staph Epi R 5⬘TGGCTAATGGTTTGTCACCA3⬘
as negative controls. Cells were collected by centrifugation

123
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

Positive PCR products (»200 bp on the agarose gel) (Applied Biosystems) and Cell number values were log10
were puriWed using the High Pure PCR product puriWcation transformed and plotted against their respective cycle
kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and DNA sequencing of threshold (CT) values to generate a standard curve for quan-
PCR products was carried out by Oswel, Southhampton, tiWcation of S. epidermidis in wash-out samples. The stan-
UK. Analysis of sequence data and homology comparisons dard curve was conWrmed by using Microsoft Excel 2000.
was performed using the BLAST, online at the NCBI The melting curve was visualised with the software Disso-
homepage (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). ciation Curve 1.0 provided with the ABI Prism 7500 sys-
To generate a standard curve for S. epidermidis quantiW- tem (Applied Biosystems). The reproducibility of the assay
cation, S. epidermidis ATCC 8558 was cultured overnight was assessed by spiking sterile washout and measuring S.
and quantitated. 50 ml sterile washout was spiked with epidermidis using the entire methodology described in this
1013–101 CFU S. epidermidis in triplicate. Contents of steri- study on three separate occasions.
lin tubes from samples and standards were collected by
centrifugation. Genomic DNA was extracted from cells
using the Wizard Bacterial Genomic DNA isolation kit Results
(Promega). S. epidermidis-speciWc primers, 5⬘Staph Epi F
and 3⬘Staph Epi R, which were tested for species-speciWc- Sixty surgical wash-out samples from prosthetic joint
ity, were used in real time PCR assays. replacement surgery were subjected to routine culture-
In SYBR Green real time PCR, the ampliWcation of the based microbiological analysis and all samples displayed
DNA target is measured in terms of the increment in the no bacterial growth under both aerobic and anaerobic con-
quantity of Xuorescence determined at the end of each ditions.
ampliWcation cycle. To determine the optimal concentration To determine the optimal method of DNA isolation from
of primers, preliminary tests were performed using equimo- sterile wash-out samples spiked to contain 1 £ 109,
lar 300, 50, 25 and 5 nM concentrations of the 5⬘Staph Epi 1 £ 106, 1 £ 103 and 0 CFU S. epidermidis, a number of
F and 3⬘Staph Epi R forward and reverse primers. Opti- DNA extraction methodologies reported in the literature
mised ampliWcation reactions were performed in a total vol- [11] including commercial kits [10] were assessed for opti-
ume of 50 l with an ABI prism 7500 sequence detector mal genomic DNA recovery. Table 2 illustrates results
(Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with 96 well from this evaluation. All DNA isolation generated A260/
microwell plates (MicroAmp; Applied Biosystems). A280 ratios in region of 1.6–1–8, indicating that the resul-
In each well, the following were added: 5 l of puriWed tant DNA was of suitable purity to be used in PCR reac-
genomic DNA, 25 l of SYBR Green I PCR Master Mix tions. The Wizard bacterial DNA isolation kit achieved the
(Applied Biosystems), a 50 nM concentration of each S. greatest recovery of DNA from all dilutions of S. epidermi-
epidermidis-speciWc primers 5⬘Staph Epi F and 3⬘Staph Epi dis, while the method employed by Kuipers et al. [11] to
R, in a Wnal volume of 50 l with Nuclease-free H2O (Pro- isolate DNA from synovial Xuid yielded slightly lower
mega). Genomic DNA from non-spiked sterile wash-out recovery rates. The Qiagen commercial kit has previously
samples was applied as a negative control. The reaction been used to isolate S. epidermidis from bone and soft tis-
mixture was run online at 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for sue [10] and to detect bacterial DNA in synovial Xuid form
10 min (to activate ampli Taq Gold), followed by 35 cycles horses with infectious synovitis [16], however when this kit
at 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s, with an was applied in the extraction of S. epidermidis DNA from
extension phase of 1 cycle at 95°C for 1 min, 60°C for wash-out samples, it yielded poor results in comparison to
1 min and 95°C (ramp time, 19.59 min). other procedures. The Sigma bacterial DNA isolation kit
The results were visualised using the software Sequence proved least eVective at recovering high levels of bacterial
Detector 1.7 provided with the ABI Prism 7500 system DNA from surgical wash-out samples. These results dem-

Table 2 QuantiWcation of
Method of DNA Weight of DNA recovered
genomic DNA (mean and
isolation
standard deviation) 1 £ 109 CFU 1 £ 106 CFU 1 £ 103 CFU 0 CFU
(ng l¡1) (ng l¡1)

Phenol/chloroform 852 § 0.06 ng l¡1 521 § 0.04 22 § 0.04 0


Kuipers 1.24 § 0.07 g l¡1 654 § 0.07 34 § 0.06 0
Wizard 1.56 § 0.08 g l ¡1
833 § 0.06 50 § 0.04 0
Results presented as a mean of Qiagen 431 § 0.09 g l¡1 266 § 0.04 27 § 0.04 0
three replicates Sigma 381 § 0.10 g l¡1 184 § 0.03 9 § 0.05 0

123
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

onstrated that the Wizard kit protocol was most suitable to


be used in further PCR-based studies in this project.
Staphylococus epidermidis-speciWc primers were designed
using the software programme ‘Primer3’ and conWrmed
to be species-speciWc using the bioinformatic analysis
tool, BLAST. DNA, isolated from S. epidermidis, S. aureus
and S. auricularis was subjected to S. epidermidis-speciWc
PCR using the oligonucleotide primers designed in this
study. Following agarose gel electrophoresis the gel was vis-
ualised (Fig. 1). PCR product of the correct size (194 bp)
was generated from S. epidermidis while no ampliWcation
was evident from the negative controls, indicating that the
primers designed in this study were indeed S. epidermidis- Fig. 2 Melting peak analysis of S. epidermidis-speciWc real time PCR
speciWc. To further conWrm the species speciWcity of the assay
primers, the positive PCR product was puriWed and sub-
jected to sequence analysis. BLAST analysis of resultant To produce a standard curve for real time PCR studies,
sequence conWrmed that this product was indeed speciWc to sterile washout was spiked with 1013–101 CFU S. epidermi-
S. epidermidis (data not shown). This result in addition to dis in triplicate and subjected to this technique. The stan-
the inability of the primers to amplify any product from neg- dard curve constructed using mean CT generated for
ative controls compounds the speciWcity of the primers standard concentrations of S. epidermidis (1013–101 CFU
designed and as such, were applied in real time PCR studies. per 50 ml) (Table 3) showed a good linearity of response
During the optimisation of real time PCR conditions, the (R2 = 0.9827) (Fig. 3).
optimal concentration of primers chosen for the experiments
was determined as 50 nM. This concentration was chosen Table 3 Mean and standard deviation CT values for real time PCR
because it provided the lowest CT and because the CT values analysis of Staphylococcus epidermidis standards
obtained at lower primer concentrations (5 and 25 nM) were Log10 copy Mean CT value Standard
signiWcantly higher (P < 0.05; data not shown). number deviation CT
The mean peak Tm obtained for all standards speciWc for
1 39.73 0.021
S. epidermidis was 84°C (range 81.5–86.5°C). It can be
2 39.06 0.046
observed in Fig. 2 that all amplicons are extremely speciWc
3 38.19 0.038
and there are no primer dimers present in reactions indicat-
ing that the real time PCR reactions are highly eYcient. The 4 36.07 0.136
negative controls did not generate any peaks when they 5 33.64 0.151
were subjected to 35 cycles of ampliWcation, further dem- 6 30.43 0.190
onstrating the speciWcity of this assay. 7 27.17 0.053
8 24.55 0.290
9 21.81 0.078
10 18.28 0.076
11 15.63 0.097
12 11.99 0.059
13 8.23 0.128
Results presented as a mean of three replicates

15
Log10 cell number

y = -0.3595x + 16.534
10 R2 = 0.9827

0
Fig. 1 The 1% agarose gel electrophoresis of Staphylococcus epide- 0 10 20 30 40 50
rmidis-speciWc PCR products. Lane 1; 100 bp ladder, Genomic DNA Cycle threshold
from: lane 2; Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 8558, lane 3; Staph-
ylococcus aureus ATCC 29313 and lane 4; Staphylococcus auricularis Fig. 3 Standard curve for S. epidermidis quantiWcation in wash-out
ATCC 33753 samples

123
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

The sensitivity limit of the reaction was <10 CFU per the target DNA, thereby requiring extensive sample prepa-
50 ml (Fig. 3). ration to remove, dilute or inactivate inhibitors prior to
The reproducibility of the assay was assessed. When S. PCR ampliWcation [6, 7, 11]. As a consequence of these
epidermidis was measured in standards employing the reports, a variety of DNA extraction methods were evalu-
entire real time PCR procedure on three separate occasions, ated in this study. It was established that diVerent DNA
results were identical, ensuring the reproducibility of the isolation procedures yielded varying recovery of DNA from
technique. S. epidermidis spiked washout and that the Wizard bacterial
To recall, the sixty wash-out samples taken from opera- genomic DNA preparation kit (Promega) isolated optimal
tions were shown to be culture negative using microbiolog- concentrations of DNA in the most pure form from sam-
ical culture-dependent techniques. S. epidermidis was also ples. This method of DNA preparation was thus utilised in
not identiWed in any of these samples using our novel spe- all real time PCR quantiWcation procedures.
cies speciWc SYBR Green real time PCR assay, indicating The most common target gene for bacterial identiWcation
that these samples are indeed true negatives and do not har- is the 16S rRNA gene that is conserved in nearly all species
bour this species. To support this result, none of these of bacteria. For example, Tunney et al. [21] used PCR to
patients have displayed any symptoms of infection (data test for evidence of bacteria in Xuids obtained by sonication
not shown). of 120 hip implants retrieved at revision arthroplasty. With
the use of primers targeting the 16S rRNA gene, this group
found that this technique was related to a high prevalence
Discussion of false positive results. The broad sensitivity of PCR
directed against the 16S rRNA detects even trace contami-
A novel, rapid sensitive and reproducible real time PCR nation by clinically irrelevant organisms that occur after
methodology has been developed for the speciWc detection specimen acquisition. One way to improve the speciWcity of
and quantiWcation of S. epidermidis in surgical wash-out PCR is to use primers targeting a speciWc organism, or
samples from prosthetic joint replacement procedures. This groups of organisms most likely to be involved in clinically
is the Wrst report of a molecular procedure, which optimally important orthopaedic infections, as was performed in the
isolates bacterial genomic DNA from orthopaedic wash-out current study.
samples and speciWcally quantiWes this species using real Other investigators have used this approach. Sakai et al.
time PCR technology. The methodology is culture-indepen- developed a PCR assay for staphylococci, in which post-
dent and extremely sensitive, capable of detecting S. epide- ampliWcation melting curve analysis allows distinction
rmidis at levels as low as 10 CFU per reaction. between S. aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci
At present, S. epidermidis is routinely quantiWed in hos- [18]. Kobayashi et al. used a combination of a modiWed
pital laboratories by culture. The main disadvantage associ- universal PCR and sequencing technology to identify bac-
ated with culturing is the turnabout time that may extend to teria on the basis of DNA sequences that determine Gram-
several days. The use of real time however can circumvent positive versus Gram-negative staining [9]. Thus, combina-
this problem. The DNA isolation is completed in <2 h and tions of speciWc PCR assays may ultimately prove to be
the subsequent real time PCR step only takes 2 h, a low more useful than broad-spectrum, so-called ‘universal’ bac-
turnabout time compared to days with culture. In addition, terial assays. While there is a report in the literature of the
the present of Staphylococcus spp. has been detected in cul- detection of S. epidermidis in orthopaedic clinical samples
ture negative osteomyelitis clinical samples using real time using real time PCR, this method was not quantitative [10].
PCR [10], indicating its lack of sensitivity. The problem of false positivity in PCR-based studies has
It has been reported in previous studies that the method frustrated researchers and clinicians due to unreliable inter-
of DNA preparation in PCR-based bacterial detection and pretation of positive molecular results. To eliminate these
quantiWcation methodologies is of crucial importance in problems, some precautions were taken in this study. First,
improving the sensitivity of the procedure [4, 22]. Kuipers PCR reagents were treated with UV irradiation and sec-
et al. [11], in a study describing the optimisation of sample ondly to avoid contamination from DNA in the air the PCR
preparation of synovial Xuid for detection of Chlamydia reactions were formulated carefully in a laminar Xow hood.
trachomatis DNA by PCR, concluded that the method of In addition, intra-operative sampling by the surgeon is of
sample preparation signiWcantly inXuences the sensitivity utmost importance to avoid contamination of wash-out
of subsequent PCR. Daly et al. [4], noted appreciable diVer- samples. Care was taken to employ aseptic technique at all
ences in the sensitivity of a PCR-ELISA method to detect stages of sampling.
Escherichia coli depending on the DNA extraction tech- In order to overcome the likely limitation of this meth-
nique employed. Other groups found that in using certain odology of DNA ampliWcation from dead cells, it may be
DNA isolation methods, PCR inhibitors co-puriWed with possible in some instances to incorporate a reverse

123
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

transcription step in conjunction with real time PCR to 10. Kobayashi N, Bauer TW, Tuohy MJ, Lieberman IH, Krebs V,
distinguish between viable and non-viable cells. Other new Togawa D, Fujishiro T, Procop GW (2006) The comparison of py-
rosequencing molecular Gram stain, culture, and conventional
techniques, which may have a role in the diagnosis of via- Gram stain for diagnosing orthopaedic infections. J Orthop Res
ble infecting bacteria in orthopaedic clinical samples 24(8):1641–1649
include the use of microarray technology [3]. A microarray 11. Kuipers JG, Nietfeld L, Dreses-Werringloer U, Koehler L, Wol-
allows the isolation and evaluation of numerous mRNA lenhaupt J, Zeidler H, Hammer M (1999) Optimised sample prep-
aration of synovial Xuid for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis
genes with a single test. The premise of this technique is to DNA by polymerase chain reaction. Ann Rheum Dis 58(2):103–
identify organism-speciWc genes and as mRNA is targeted, 108
only live bacteria are detected. 12. Livak KJ, Flood SJ, Marmaro J, Giusti W, Deetz K (1995) Oligo-
To conclude, a novel, rapid sensitive and reproducible nucleotides with Xuorescent dyes at opposite ends provide a
quenched probe system useful for detecting PCR product and nu-
real time PCR methodology has been developed for the cleic acid hybridization. PCR Methods Appl 4(6):357–362
speciWc detection and quantiWcation of S. epidermidis in 13. Mariani BD, Levine MJ, Booth RE Jr, Tuan RS (1995) Develop-
surgical wash-out samples from prosthetic joint replace- ment of a novel, rapid processing protocol for polymerase chain
ment procedures. However, to illustrate the full eVective- reaction-based detection of bacterial infections in synovial Xuids.
Mol Biotechnol 4(3):227–237
ness of this real time PCR assay a larger number of samples 14. Mariani BD, Tuan RS (1998) Advances in the diagnosis of infec-
need to be tested (>1,000 patients). tion in prosthetic joint implants. Mol Med Today 4(5):207–213
15. Martineau F, Picard FJ, Roy PH, Ouellette M, Bergeron MG
(1996) Species-speciWc and ubiquitous DNA-based assays for rap-
id identiWcation of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Clin Microbiol
References 34(12):2888–2893
16. Pille F, Martens A, Schouls LM, Peelman L, Gasthuys F, Schot
1. Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Gamberini S, Donati ME, Montanaro CS, De Baere C, Desmet P, Vandenberghe F (2005) Detection of
L (2004) Presence of Wbrinogen-binding adhesin gene in Staphy- bacterial DNA in synovial Xuid from horses with infectious syno-
lococcus epidermidis isolates from central venous catheters-asso- vitis. Res Vet Sci 77:198–195
ciated and orthopaedic implant-associated infections. Biomaterials 17. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a
25(19):4825–4829 laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press,
2. Arciola CR, Alvi FI, An YH, Campoccia D, Montanaro L (2005) Cold Spring Harbor, New York
Implant infection and infection resistant materials: a mini review. 18. Sakai H, Procop GW, Kobayashi N, Togawa D, Wilson DA, Bor-
Int J Artif Organs 28(11):1119–1125 den L, Krebs V, Bauer TW (2004) Simultaneous detection of
3. Bauer TW, Parvizi J, Kobayashi N, Krebs V (2006) Diagnosis of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci in
periprosthetic infection. J Bone Joint Surg 88(4):869–882 positive blood cultures by real-time PCR with two Xuorescence
4. Daly P, Collier T, Doyle S (2002) PCR-ELISA detection of Esc- resonance energy transfer probe sets. J Clin Microbiol 42(12):5739–
herichia coli in milk. Lett Appl Microbiol 34:222–226 5744
5. Floyed RL, Steele RW (2003) Culture-negative osteomyelitis. Pe- 19. Steckelberg JM, Osmon DR (2000) Prosthetic joint infections.
diatr Infect Dis J 8:731 American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, pp 173–209
6. Fratamico PM, Bagi LK, Pepe T (2000) A multiplex polymerase 20. Tarkin IS, Henry TJ, Fey PI, Iwen PC, Hinrichs SH, Garvin KL
chain assay for rapid detection and identiWcation of Escherichia (2003) PCR rapidly detects methicillin-resistant staphylococci
coli 0157:H7 in foods and bovine feces. J Food Prot 63:1032–1037 periprosthetic infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 414:89–94
7. González I, Garcia T, Fernandez A, Sanz B, Hernandez PE, Martin 21. Tunney MM, Patrick S, Curran MD, Ramage G, Hanna D, Nixon
R (1999) Rapid enumeration of Escherichia coli in oysters by a JR, Gorman SP, Davis RI, Anderson N (1999) Detection of pros-
quantitative PCR-ELISA. J Appl Microbiol 86:231–236 thetic hip infection at revision arthroplasty by immunoXuores-
8. Ikeda Y, Ohara-Nemoto Y, Kimura S, Ishibashi K, Kikuchi K cence microscopy and PCR ampliWcation of the bacterial 16S
(2004) PCR-based identiWcation of Staphylococcus epidermidis rRNA gene. J Clin Microbiol 37(10):3281–3290
targeting gseA endocing the glutamic-acid speciWc protease. Can J 22. Waters SM, Doyle S, Murphy RA, Power RF (2005) Development
Microbiol 50(7):493–498 of solution phase hybridisation PCR-ELISA for the detection and
9. Kobayashi N, Bauer TW, Togawa D, Lieberman IH, Sakai H, Fu- quantiWcation of Enterococcus faecalis and Pediococcus pento-
jishiro T, Tuohy MJ, Procop GW (2005) A molecular gram stain saceus in Nurmi-type cultures. J Microbiol Methods 63(3):264–
using broad range PCR and pyrosequencing technology: a poten- 275
tially useful tool for diagnosing orthopaedic infections. Diagn Mol
Pathol 14(2):83–89

123

You might also like