Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/262922619
CITATIONS READS
11 1,354
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Minerals Special issue - Evolution and Modeling of Iron Ore Sintering Process View project
TRANSIENT SOLIDIFICATION OF MULTICOMPONENT ALLOYS: A MACRO/MICRO SCALE APPROACH AND THERMOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES - CNPq 302381/2019-8 (PPGEM-
ITEC-UFPa) View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Flavia Vitoretti on 06 August 2014.
www.jmrt.com.br
Original Article
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The process for pelletizing iron ore fines is an important operation unit for producing high
Received 10 April 2013 quality of raw materials for the subsequent reduction processes such as blast furnace or
Accepted 10 June 2013 direct reduction. The process essentially involves production of green pellets and induration
Available online 12 November 2013 on a traveling grate furnace to promote inner partial melt and agglomeration that confers
adequate physical and metallurgical properties. This work focuses on the phenomena that
Keywords: occur in the firing step aiming the construction of a mathematical model that describes
Pellets each phase and chemical species. The model was formulated based on transport equations
Pelletizing able to predict the evolution of the temperature profile inside the pellet for each zone on the
Induration induration furnace. It was taken into account coupled phenomena of momentum, energy
Modeling and mass transfer between gas and particles within the agglomerates. The finite volume
method was used to discretize the transport equations of momentum, mass and energy
describing the behavior of a pellet in an industrial traveling grate furnace. Model results are
shown for the temperature profile along the pellet radius during the residence time inside
the furnace. In this context, in the present work i a tool was developed to optimize the
thermal profile in the induration furnace and hence control the mechanical strength of
the agglomerate.
© 2013 Brazilian Metallurgical, Materials and Mining Association. Published by Elsevier
Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
Abbreviations: Ai , surface area of solid materials; Cp , heat capacity; DTi,j , binary diffusivity; Ėi , convective heat transfer; F i ,
j j
j
momentum transfer; Hi , enthalpy of phase i; Hi , heat of formation of specie j in phase i; hi–j , heat transfer coefficient; ki ,
thermal conductivity of phase i; Mj , molecular weight of specie j; Pi , pressure of phase i; R, gas constant; Rn , rate of reaction n;
Ti , temperature of phase i; U i , velocity vector of phase i; Wi–j , Weber number; εi , volume fraction of phase i; i , density of phase
i; i , dependent variable in Eq. (2.1); ϕi , shape factor for phase i.
∗
Corresponding author.
E-mail: flaviapv@metal.eeimvr.uff.br (F.d.P. Vitoretti).
2238-7854/$ – see front matter © 2013 Brazilian Metallurgical, Materials and Mining Association. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2013.06.004
316 j m a t e r r e s t e c h n o l . 2 0 1 3;2(4):315–322
a
Chimney
Burners
Moving grate
b Chimney
1500
1400 Drying Heating Firing Cooling
1300
1200
1100
1000
Temperature (ºC)
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Residence time (min)
Fig. 1 – (a) Scheme of the pelletizing furnace in a Traveling Grate system, (b) average temperature profile pellet with different
sizes characteristics along of residence time in the furnace [1].
j m a t e r r e s t e c h n o l . 2 0 1 3;2(4):315–322 317
Gas
Pellets
in the bed
Fig. 2 – Scheme of gas flow among the pellets distributed in the furnace bed.
∂(i εi hi ) ki Ranz–Marshall Correlation to convective heat transfer and
i hi ) = div
+ div(i εi U grad(hi )
∂t CPi Stefan–Boltzmann Law to radiation heat transfer [3]:
nreactions
g
+ Rni Hni + Ėi
j
(3) QS = −heff A(Ts − Tf ) − ε
A(Ts4 − Tf4 ) (7)
n=1
and
∂(i εi i,ispecies )
i i,ispecies ) = div(εi Dbulk grad(i,ispecies ))
+ div(i εi U kg
ispecies 0.5 1/3
∂t heff = [2.0 + 0.39(Reg−s ) (Prg ) ] (8)
dp
nreactions
+ Mispecies Rni (4)
n=1
where A is the superficial area, Ts is the pellet tempera-
ture, Tf is the furnace temperature dependent of the position
in bed, dp pellet diameter, ε is emissivity (ε = 0.9) [3],
is
Thus, the pellets can be treated as a porous media with the
Stefan–Boltzmann Constant (
= 5.67 × 10−8 J/s m2 K4 ) and Reg
boundary conditions for gas flow, energy and mass transfer in
and Prg are dimensionless numbers Reynolds and Prandt,
the interior of the pellet imposed at the surface of the individ-
respectively, calculated using average value of the properties
ual pellet by using an effective overall heat transfer coefficient
and velocity field of the gas in furnace position and of the
and the composition of the surface gas given by the furnace
pellet.
atmosphere. The pellet is composed of particles with different
In order to model the heat transfer between gas and par-
sizes and composition [5] and thus, local variables of poros-
ticles solid phases inner pellet, the energy source depends
ity and thermo physical properties can be considered in the
on the heat transfer coefficient among gas and particles solid
model.
phases, according Ranz–Marshall Correlation [3]:
This model is assumed as a multiphase model due to
the several phases considered and it was used to describe
6ε
the phenomena of fluid flow, heat transfer and chemical j
Ėi = hg−s i
(Tg − Ts )
species conservations constitutive relations to account for di ϕi
i
phase interactions are used. In this paper, it was considered
kg 0.5 1/3
6ε
the gas, solid, and partial molten phases that can be developed = [2.0 + 0.39(Reg−s ) (Prg ) ] fi i (Tg − Ts ) (9)
within the pellet along the furnace zones. Table 2 provides the di di ϕi
i
chemical species present in this model.
The momentum, energy and mass exchanges were consid-
ered in the model by using semi-empirical correlations [3]. The where T represents the average temperature within the
momentum exchange was modeled by the modified Ergun’s control volume occupied by particles solid and gas phases.
equation [6] suitable for anisotropic packed bed which approx- Re and Pr are inner local modified dimensionless numbers
imate the inner pellet structure. Reynolds and Prandt, respectively, calculated using average
value of the properties and velocity field within the pellet.
−
→s −
→g
The mass transfer takes place in the pelletizing furnace due
Fg=−Fs = fi Fi |U ៝ s |(U
g − U g − U
s) (5) to chemical reactions and phase transformations. Firstly the
m moisture is evaporated from the interior of solids where the
1
εi
2 εi
vapor water diffusion through boundary layer plays important
Fi = 150g + 1.75g (6) role. The rate equation, representing the moisture evaporation
g − U
|U s| (1 − εi )di ϕi (1 − εi )di ϕi
can be represented by Eq. (8).
400 1260
350 1240
1220
300 Pellet 8 mm
Pellet 8 mm 1200 Pellet 12 mm
Pellet 12 mm Pellet 15mm
Temperature (ºC)
Temperature (ºC)
250 Pellet 15 mm
1180
200 1160
150 1140
1120
100
1100
50
1080
0 1060
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 25 26 27
Residence time (min) Residence time (min)
Fig. 4 – Average temperature profile according to residence Fig. 6 – Average temperature profile according to residence
time of the pellet in the drying zone. time of the pellet in the firing zone.
of the reactions, which depend on the local oxygen potential pellets, therefore in this region the heating rate must be con-
and temperature [3]. trolled. In the final step, the temperature of the drying process
900 1300
1200
850 1100 Pellet 8 mm
Pellet 8 mm Pellet 12 mm
Pellet 12 mm 1000 Pellet 15 mm
800 Pellet 15 mm
900
Temperature (ºC)
Temperature (ºC)
800
750
700
600
700
500
650 400
300
600 200
100
550
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
Residence time (min) Residence time (min)
Fig. 5 – Average temperature profile according to residence Fig. 7 – Average temperature profile according to residence
time of the pellet in the heating zone. time of the pellet in the cooling zone.
320 j m a t e r r e s t e c h n o l . 2 0 1 3;2(4):315–322
a b
450 1100
2,10 m (Drying zone) 27,30 m (Heating zone)
400 12,60 m (Drying zone) 1000 37,80 m (Heating zone)
23,10 m (Drying zone) 48,30 m (Heating zone)
350 900
Temperature (ºC)
Temperature (ºC)
300 800
250 700
200 600
150 500
100 400
50 300
0 200
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4
Pellet radius (mm) Pellet radius (mm)
c d
1400 1400
54,60 m (Firing zone) 1300 94,50 m (Cooling zone)
73,50 m (Firing zone) 123,90 m (Cooling zone)
90,30 m (Firing zone) 1200 153,30 m (Cooling zone)
1300 1100
1000
Temperature (ºC)
Temperature (ºC)
900
1200
800
700
1100 600
500
400
1000 300
200
100
900 0
0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4
Pellet radius (mm) Pellet radius (mm)
Fig. 8 – Temperature profiles within an individual pellet of 8 mm diameter along the furnace zones, (a) drying zone, (b)
heating zone, (c) firing zone and (d) cooling zone.
Figs. 8–10 compare the temperature distribution behavior surface and center of the pellets can be quite different, mainly
along the pellet radius at beginning, middle and end of each due to the time need to the thermal front propagate and get
zone for the pellets of 8, 12 and 15 mm, respectively. It is uniform within the agglomerate structure, which in turn, is
observed that the temperature patterns present similar behav- strongly dependent upon the inner gas path and agglomerate
ior for all zones, although the temperature differences for composition.
a b
450 1100
2,10 m (Drying zone) 27,30 m (Heating zone)
400 12,60 m (Drying zone) 1000 37,80 m (Heating zone)
23,10 m (Drying zone) 48,30 m (Heating zone)
350 900
Temperature (ºC)
Temperature (ºC)
300 800
250 700
200 600
150 500
100 400
50 300
200
00 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
c Pellet radius (mm) d Pellet radius (mm)
1400 1400
54,60 m (Firing zone) 1300 94,50 m (Cooling zone)
73,50 m (Firing zone) 123,90 m (Cooling zone)
90,30 m (Firing zone) 1200 153,30 m (Cooling zone)
1300 1100
1000
Temperature (ºC)
Temperature (ºC)
900
1200
800
700
600
1100
500
400
1000 300
200
100
900 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Fig. 9 – Temperature profiles within an individual pellet of 12 mm diameter along the furnace zones, (a) drying zone, (b)
heating zone, (c) firing zone and (d) cooling zone.
j m a t e r r e s t e c h n o l . 2 0 1 3;2(4):315–322 321
a b
450 1100
2,10 m (Drying zone) 27,30 m (Heating zone)
400 12,60 m (Drying zone) 1000 37,80 m (Heating zone)
23,10 m (Drying zone) 48,30 m (Heating zone)
350 900
Temperature (ºC)
Temperature (ºC)
300 800
250 700
200 600
150 500
100 400
50 300
0 200
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
c Pellet radius (mm) d Pellet radius (mm)
1400 1400
54,60 m (Firing zone) 1300 94,50 m (Cooling zone)
73,50 m (Firing zone) 123,90 m (Cooling zone)
90,30 m (Firing zone) 1200 153,30 m (Cooling zone)
1300 1100
1000
Temperature (ºC)
Temperature (ºC)
900
1200
800
700
600
1100
500
400
1000 300
200
100
900 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Pellet redius (mm) Pellet redius (mm)
Fig. 10 – Temperature profiles within an individual pellet of 15 mm diameter along the furnace zones, (a) drying zone, (b)
heating zone, (c) firing zone and (d) cooling zone.
It is observed in Fig. 8 that as the temperature progress properties of the fired pellets and justify the production of
inward the pellet with 8 mm the gas flows through the strictly controlled green pellets.
pores and as time passes the temperature became uni-
form due to the combined effect of heat conduction and
inner convection. At the beginning of each zone the sur- 4. Conclusions
face of the pellets instantly reaches the gas temperature due
to high external effective heat coefficient, which accounts A mathematical model able to predict the behavior of the
for convective and radiation effects, in the interior of the average temperature of the pellets with different diameters
pellet the conduction of the heat through the pores plays in traveling grate furnace was developed. The inner temper-
the major role and leads the center temperature of the ature pattern for the pellets along the grate passing through
pellet to remain lower. This pattern was observed for all the zones was predicted for the individual pellets. The model
zones and in the cooling region the temperature gradient is implementation and simulation procedure allowed to predict
inverted. the temperature profile of each pellet traveling throughout the
Fig. 9 shows similar trend for the temperature pattern drying, heating, firing and cooling zones of the furnace and
for pellets with 12 mm of diameter, although the rate of the temperature gradient along of the pellet radius was also
heating and cooling are strongly dependent on the pellet shown. Numerical results for pellets with different diameters
diameter. showed the impact of charging pellets with wider granu-
Fig. 10 shows the temperature radial distribution for pellets lometric distribution in the furnace and indicated that the
with 15 mm of diameter. It was observed lower tempera- properties of the pellets could be significantly different since
ture gradient in the drying zone due to higher consumption the thermal cycle of the individual pellets has strong effect
of heat during the evaporation of water, indicating that the on the phase transformations and induration phenomena. In
heat transfer within the pellet is the controlling mecha- this investigation it is concluded that pellets with narrow dis-
nism for temperature increase, which was not observed for tribution would give moderate inner temperature gradient and
smaller pellets. For the other zones the temperature pattern hence it is expected to present suitable mechanical and met-
showed similar behavior although larger thermal gradient was allurgical properties.
observed, as expected.
These results confirmed the strong dependency of the
Conflicts of interest
suitable residence time for each granulometric range and
suggests that narrow distribution will produce more uniform The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
322 j m a t e r r e s t e c h n o l . 2 0 1 3;2(4):315–322