Assignment5:

An experiment was conducted involving 3 different advertising media, each used for 5 fast
food restaurants of a certain franchise. The 15 restaurants were located in different but
comparable cities, and they were randomly assigned to the 3 advertising media: radio,
newspaper, television. All advertising took place during the same time period. Profits y in
thousands of dollars were recorded for the same time period. Although all restaurants were
of the same size, they employed different numbers of workers. Since additional employees
may affect profits, the number of employees was used as a concomitant variable x.

radio newspaper television

x y x y x y
10 30 21 24 34 17
14 18 26 20 39 11
19 13 31 7 43 3
25 6 36 4 47 -6
27 3 41 -5 52 -10

Complete the analysis of covariance for the data given.

Assignment6:
A leading shoe manufacturer has 500 showrooms across the country. The company wants to
know the average difference in sales of these showrooms. It also wants to know the average
sales difference between salesmen. For ascertaining the productivity of different salesmen,
the company has adopted a practice of retaining one salesman for three months at one
showroom. The company randomly selected five showrooms and five salesmen from each of
the showrooms. The following table exhibits the average sales (in thousand rupees) from
showrooms and the individual contribution of the five salesmen placed at different
showrooms.

Table: Sales volume generated by five salesmen and sales from different showrooms (in
thousand rupees)

Showrooms Showroom
Salesman Showroom1 Showroom2 Showroom3 Showroom4 Showroom5
Salesman 1 55 72 45 85 50
Salesman 2 56 70 50 88 49
Salesman 3 58 68 55 89 45
Salesman 4 60 70 42 90 42
Salesman 5 62 73 41 91 40

Use ANOVA to examine (take 99% as confidence level for testing the hypotheses)
i. Whether the salesmen significantly differ in productivity?
 ii. Whether there is a significant difference between the average sales of showrooms?

Assignment7:
Mahindra & Mahindra, the flagship company of the Mahindra group manufactures utility
vehicles and tractors. Data relating to sales, compensation to employees and advertisement
expenses of Mahindra & Mahindra from March 2003 to March 2020 are given in the
following table. Taking sales as the dependent variable and compensation to employees and
advertisement expenses as independent variables, determine the line of regression.
Comment on the coefficient of multiple determination ( R2) and the standard error of the
model. Let  = 0.05
Sales (in Compensation to employees Advertisement expenses
million (in million rupees) (in million rupees)
rupees)
Mar 2003 9028.1 1105.5 22
Mar 2004 9983 1283.9 18.5
Mar 2005 11967.3 1481.4 24
Mar 2006 14584.5 1813.4 52.3
Mar 2007 16741.8 2077.9 32.5
Mar 2008 20391.4 2335.4 54.3
Mar 2009 27831.4 2950.5 91.2
Mar 2010 35214.4 3416.7 124.1
Mar 2011 39976.3 3874.8 158.6
Mar 2012 41020.3 3853.4 158.3
Mar 2013 43207.9 3975.7 349.2
Mar 2014 42778.7 4250.3 402.3
Mar 2015 39360.5 3907.6 307.9
Mar 2016 44997.1 3851.9 289.6
Mar 2017 58888.4 4278.4 523.8
Mar 2018 76547.7 4695.1 576.1
Mar 2019 92764.9 5587.6 548.7
Mar 2020 112384.9 7024.1 822.7

Also check the presence of multicollinearity in the given dataset.