Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TORT: The study of civil wrongs without a contact for which the law provides a remedy.
Intent: Is the desire or knowledge to bring about harm or the substantial certainty (97%) that the harm will occur.
Transferred Intent: A person who suffers an intentional tort need not prove that the actor intended the tort to
apply to him.
Assault, Battery, False Imprisonment, Trespass to Realty, Trespass to Chattel
Battery
An intentional harmful or offensive touching to another person.
Intentional Touching Harmful or Offensive
Transferred -This does not have to be person to person -A reasonable person would find it
Intent applies - Can be something you caused to come in offensive
contact with them -Account for social norms
- The person does not have to be aware of the -least touching in anger is offensive
touching (kissing someone sleeping)
Assault
An intentional act causing an imminent apprehension of a harmful or offensive touching to another person.
Intent Imminent Apprehension Harmful or Offensive
Transferred -About to happen. - A feeling of anxiety or fear that -A reasonable person
Intent applies -Can be either present something bad or unpleasant will would find it offensive
acts or words. happen -Account for social norms
-Not future threats. -any sensory indication
-They have to know!
IIED
Intentional or reckless act that is extreme or outrageous conduct intended to cause severe emotional harm to
another person.
Intentional or Outrageous & Extreme Causation Sever Distress
Reckless
There is no Measured by social standards. Courts Usually it is Physical harm-most states
Transferred frequently find IIED where there is an implied require a physical
Intent. authoritative relationship or economic manifestation of harm.
motivation.
It must be measurable.
Examples: Migraine headache can be
creditors measured through blood
landlords vessels.
funeral homes.
Continue seeing a
Look for something that would make the psychiatrist.
individual hypersensitive i.e. child, pregnant
mother.
This is a sliding scale
Conversion
The intentional exercise of dominion and control over a chattel, which seriously interferes with the possessor’s
right of control.
Extent/duration of Intent to assert Actors good faith Harm done to Inconvenience &
control and right chattel expense caused to
interference possessor
Hypos
You are at a restaurant and leave with the wrong hat. You realize Extent & duration → minimal
this just after leaving and return the hat immediately Intent → yes, to take the hat
Good faith → yes
Harm done → none
Inconvenience & expense → little
Not Conversion
You are at a restaurant and leave with the wrong hat. You realize Extent & duration → minimal
this after going home. You call the restaurant that is closing and Intent → yes, to take the hat
arrange to return it first thing in the morning. Good faith → yes
Harm done → none
Inconvenience & expense → little
Not Conversion
You are at the restaurant and leave with the wrong hat. You realize Extent & duration → permanent
this just after leaving but then the hat blows off your head and falls Intent → yes, to take the hat
into the drainage system. Good faith → NA
Harm done → yes, hat is gone
Inconvenience & expense → hat is gone
Is a Conversion
This is a sliding scale, any one or a compilation of them could cause it to be a conversion.
Privilege
Implied consent-look at customs and usage
Example: when we participate in a sport we waive our right not to get hurt unless it is not expected or
unreasonably outside the rules of the sport.