Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prepared for:
Prepared By:
Md. Kamrul Islam Khan - 1511061030
Jameus Siam 1510873030
Nargis Sultana 1511052030
Tanjina Islam - 1420691030
Sudipta Debnath - 1512019030
MD. Mohtasim Neaz - 1330381630
2|Page
Table of Content
2. Internal Analysis……………………………………………………………………05
3. Resources
4. Capabilities
5. External Analysis……………………………………………………………...........07
6. Industry Identification
9. PESTLE Analysis
17. References………………………………………………………………………….19
3|Page
Introduction
Snap Inc is a well-known camera company. Their executive office is situated at 63 Market Street,
Venice, California 90291. The company’s flagship product is Snapchat, a camera application that
avails people to communicate through videos and images. Roughly 150 million people use this
application every day, and they consume around 800 hours of video per second.
On September 16, 2011, Snap Inc. started its journey and re-launched initially of Picaboo as
Snapchat. On December 31, 2013, the application was hacked and the information of 4.6 million
users were leaked to the internet. In the same year on December, the high-profile executive who
had been with Facebook, Google and Instragram were hired as COO. On January 2014, this
corporation refused an acquisition offer of $3B of Facebook (Fiegerman, 2014). In May, the
company acquired the software Company ADDLive and in December they acquired Vengeance
Lab for $15M. In September 2015, the company acquired Looksery to develop lenses for its mobile
app. By 2016, the company acquired Bitstrips for $100M and Verb for $100M and focus on
spectacles (Etherington, 2016). In September of the same year, the company officially named itself
as Snap Inc. and unveiled Spectacles. In December, the company opened R&D in Shenzhen and
acquired advertising and tech company Flite. In March 2017, the company first went public and
4|Page
INTERNAL ANALYSIS
Resources: The tangible and intangible resources of Snapchat Inc. corporation are as follows:
▪ Patents & Copyrights: Snap Inc’s. patents and copyrights fall under intangible resources.
They license content, trademarks, technology, and other intellectual property from our
partners. As of December 31, 2016, Snap Inc. had issued 328 patents and filed roughly 220
patent applications in the United States and foreign countries to protect their camera platform
and other innovations. Their issued patents will be ceased between 2017 and 2035.
▪ Acquired Users: The company has declared that approximately 158 million people use its
App daily, sending 2.5 billion Snaps on the platform. The average user spends in the region of
30 minutes a day on the platform. It therefore appears that a large portion of the market of
millennials, entrenched within this platform, a segment of the market that many competitors
have struggled to capture. These users attract the advertisers and a segment of these users also
▪ Acquired Technology: Recently made public Snap Inc. has been searching for deals in
software and hardware that can help to revamp snapchat further or strengthen its engineering
team. They have pursued Kickstarter projects, developing applications and battling start-ups.
Their Previous purchases incorporate augmented reality headset maker Vergence Labs,
personalized cartoon app Bitstrips and things-to-do search app Vurb. Snap also secured Placed,
a startup that helps to track the offline success of digital ad campaigns and Zenly, a Startup
that creates social maps that allow users to see where their friends are located. Recently, they
acquired 3D gaming engine PlayCanvas in hope of entering the augmented and virtual reality
gaming. The corporate development team has earned great reputation for its thoughtful and
reasonable acquisitions.
5|Page
▪ Database: Snap Inc. has successfully created a large information database accumulated from
offering services to their customers and continuously upgrading their software and developing
new filters from time to time. This gathered information gives them a competitive edge over
their competitors.
▪ Facilities: Snap Inc.’s headquarter is located in and around Venice, California/ and the have
about 305,000 squares across several locations. As of December 31, 2016, their global facilities
582,500 of which was leased and 8,500 of which was owned. For approximately 77,000 square
feet of our leased office space, they also have offices in multiple locations in the United States
▪ Capital: According to TechCrunch, $1.8 billion money was added to the organization, in light
of a present valuation in the scope of $18 billion to $20 billion.. This monetary backing gives
Snapchat Inc. a firm foothold in the respective competitive social media industry.
Capabilities: The organizational structure, culture, hiring process and overall process are as
follows:
▪ Snap Inc. has over 3500 employees worldwide. It encourages diversity in its working staff
employees are well equipped and capable enough to bring expected results for the company.
▪ Snap Inc.’s R&D division is filled with creative and capable employees who always work side
by side with the marketing division to bring out the best product their consumers wants.
▪ All the acquisitions of Kickstarter projects, emerging apps and start-ups done by the corporate
development team of the company is going to help Snap Inc. in enriching and expanding their
6|Page
business in future. The technology it possesses now shows their capabilities in compete with
▪ The founders and their VC partners raised much more money than they are spending. Thus,
they have lots of free cash flow in the company which can be used in a more productive way
such as for product development, acquisitions of properties and equipment, goodwill creation,
External Analysis
I. Industry Identification: Snap Inc. a worldwide popular technology and camera company
established in U.S. This company belongs to ‘Social Media technology’ industry. The company
offers 4 products; Snapchat, Spectacles, Bitmoji, and Zenly where each of these are separately
operated under Snap Inc. Snapchat, Zenly, Bitmoji belong to social media industry as these
companies develop multimedia messaging, and location sharing applications for their users.
On the other hand, ‘Spectacles’ a smart-glass is a hardware that complements the social media
app Snapchat. So, from the research it was found out that Snap Inc. competes in both ‘social
media technology industry. Their main competitors are Apple, Facebook and Google.
II. Competitive Forces Analysis: For competitive forces analysis, we have used Porter’s Five
Forces model to draw a clear picture of the degree of competitiveness in the industry. They
are:
1. Risk of Entry by Potential Competitors: Threat of entry in the industry is moderate. With
ever-evolving social media and mobile landscape, it’s comparatively easier to create new and
unique apps. Moreover, copycat companies are emerging because of minimal technological
protection. However, massive amount of resources such as expert app developers, app
7|Page
developing and marketing costs are needed to build a successful company. Thus, the barriers
2. Threat of Substitutes: Social media industry is highly competitive. Due to lack of protecting
from the law, not a single feature can be distinctive to a company for long. Other competitors
are always copying the best features from their competitors and trying to become the best
3. Industry Rivalry: Social media apps are all about creating a platform that brings all the people
of the world under the same roof and giving opportunity to the businesses to do their
promotions online. Numerous well-established social media sites like Facebook, Instagram and
Twitter offers a similar service. Companies tend to look for a cheaper medium with
comparatively higher reach to promote their products and services. Whenever one of
competitors try to get an advantage over others, others tend to take that same path almost
instantly and gives no room for that company to utilize that. Lots of new social media apps are
also coming in the market with next generation social media services and making the
4. The bargaining Power of Suppliers: Providers of servers, storage, power, software, data
center and office equipment, technology etc. represent suppliers for social media industry.
Supply is an issue in terms of knowledge and experience which faces bottleneck. As this
industry is already seen as highly competitive and risky, losing market share due to the
inexperience of the supplier is going to be costly for the companies. Since there are not many
dependable technological firms capable enough to provide such service, there may be a
8|Page
5. The bargaining Power of Customers: As there is increasing threat of substitutes available
that provides almost similar kind of services to the customers and switching cost for the
III. Industry Life Cycle Analysis: Based on our analysis, social media industry is currently at the
❖ Demand for social media sites is increasing at a decreasing rate. From 2010 to 2011 social
media user’s growth was 24 % and expected growth rate for the year 2021 is 13%
(statista,2018).
❖ Rivalry between existing companies are getting intense. Companies like Facebook,
Instagram, Snapchat, Twitter etc. are fighting hard to take away share from its competitors.
❖ Demand is on the verge of reaching saturation level as fewer potential first time users
remain to be tapped.
❖ The demand of one service is sometimes replaced with another. For example: people have
started to choose one, Instagram or snapchat over one another. But there are still lots people
who uses both. But the market is reaching a point where majority of the users will prefer
using only one social media site or app for online social interaction.
PESTLE Analysis
Political and Legal: As the Intellectual property law is improved, the property violation is
decreased. Countries, like China, Saudi Arabia, Iran where Government surveillance is known to
infringe upon the basic civil rights of it owns people, where Freedom of Rights and Freedom of
Expression of a human being is subdued, which in many cases can cause violence, could come as
9|Page
an obstacle for a company like Snap, where their Snapchat platform can be used as a tool for
political movement. So, political and legal forces are negatively affecting the industry because of
Government Censorship.
Social: Now-a-days our lifestyle has changed drastically. We like to share our daily life activities,
our thoughts and opinions with our friends over social media only because it makes us feel good
about ourselves. We also tend to show a growing interest in others’ lives. Our concern for our
privacy has increased too. We want to keep our footprint in the social media and yet want to feel
secure there. These newly developed social norms are affecting the industry positively and again
Technological: Around 2.53 billion people in the world uses smartphones currently and it’s
expected that by 2022, half of the total world population will have smartphones in their hand.
Availability of fast paced internet connection such as 4g and 5g has made it even easier for the
users to communicate with each other which positively affects the social media industry. Users are
becoming more inclined to communicating with images and videos. The very same reason is
attracting different businesses to use social media platform for promotional purposes. These
Demographic: There are substantial differences in social media use by age. Some 88% of 18 to
29 years old indicate that they use any form of social media (ANDERSON, 2018). It’s quite evident
that most of the users of social media sites are younger generation. Older people are less interested
10 | P a g e
SWOT Analysis
Strengths:
1. Over the years Snap Inc. has invested in building a strong brand portfolio that will be
3. Snap Inc. has strong free cash flows within the company that can be used for the benefit of the
company.
4. Successful track record of integrating complimentary firms through mergers & acquisition. It
has successfully integrated number of technology companies in the past few years to streamline
6. They have a strong user base, known to be more active and engaging compared to the
Weaknesses:
2. Financial planning is not done properly and efficiently. The current asset ratio and liquid asset
ratios indicate that the organization can utilize the money more proficiently than what it is
doing currently.
4. They don’t have manufacturing capabilities. Rather, they depend on single contract
manufacturers.
11 | P a g e
5. Their geographically dispersed office structure prevents them from overseeing employees and
6. They are continuously failing to protect their intellectual properties from their competitors.
7. Snap Inc has lots of free cash flow lying within the company which indicates that the
Opportunities:
1. Free cash flow within the company gives them opportunity to expand into new projects and
2. Growth of the mobile advertising market has increased substantially over the past few years.
4. Their recent acquisitions give them opportunities to expand in new businesses and develop
5. Advertisers look for more personal mediums to reach their target market and Snap Inc’s way
of reaching consumers fits the code. Thus, more advertisers are getting attracted to use it for
Threats:
1. They are dependent on Google Cloud for majority of their computing, storage, bandwidth, and
other services. Any interference with their utilization of the Google Cloud activities would
12 | P a g e
2. They generate almost all of their revenue from advertising. The inability to draw in new
advertisers, the loss of advertisers, or a cutback in how much they can expend, could seriously
3. Their business is highly competitive which is expected to intensify as the time advances. If
they can’t maintain or improve their market share, their business will suffer.
4. Snap Inc’s business depends on mobile operating systems, hardware, networks, regulations,
and standards that is out of their control. Changes in their products or to those operating
systems, hardware, networks, regulations, or standards may substantially harm their user
5. If they fail to monetize from their businesses, they may end up being bankrupt.
7. Products are imitable. Existing and potential competitors tend to copy each other’s product to
Customer group
People who are using smart phone, they are the customer group of Snap Inc. Snap Inc. provides
snapchat camera application, spectacles, bitmoji to their customer. The young generation is
basically using Snap Inc.’s product. Every day about 150 million people are using Snap Inc.’s
flagship product Snapchat. According to the Wall Street Journal, mainly 12-34-year-old
13 | P a g e
Customer need
Snap Inc. is a camera company and it doesn’t want to be known as an app startup any longer. This
company is repositioning itself as a “camera company”. The company acknowledges that they
believe the camera screen will be the starting point for more products on smartphones and this is
because the images created by smartphone cameras contain more information and context than
other form.
They believe they are young person’s network and the company said that the company wants to
create more camera products to improve customer’s lifestyle. So, it can be said that they are
focusing on the camera features that a customer will want. They include it in their mission
statement that their customers want innovative camera product so that they can live and
communicate in a better way. This purpose can be seen on launching the first physical product
‘Spectacles’. This product is a camera-based sunglass which connects directly to the customer’s
Distinctive Competency
After analyzing the company’s internal resources and capabilities it’s safe to declare that Snap
Inc’s distinctive competency mainly lies in its R&D and marketing division. The marketing
division does extensive market research and successfully finds out the value their consumers seek
and communicate those values properly to the R&D division. Then, R&D division comes up with
the products and services that differentiates the company from its competitors.
14 | P a g e
Financial Performance
In terms of analyzing the financial performance of Snap Inc. first we calculated the current ratio
of past 3 years. Current Ratio helps to measure a company’s ability to pay off its current liabilities
by using its current assets. Over the past three years we can see the current ratio is increasing year
by year that means Snap Inc. has more current assets to pay off their current liability. But in
compare with its immediate competitor Facebook, its performance is poor and that means they are
not using their current assets efficiently and have more liability compare to their competitor.
Next, we calculated their net profit margin to analyze their profitability. As they are having net
loss over the past 3 years their net profit margin showed negative results but in 2016 it was better
15 | P a g e
and again it fell but was better than 2015.Again, if we compare their performance with Facebook,
then we can see their performance is too poor compared to the competitor and they must have
some fault in their strategy which is resulting in the negative result in net profit.
And finally, we calculate the Return on Invested Capital to estimate whether they are earning
enough return on their investment. In terms of this ratio they are not doing good because of their
Competitive Advantages
Snap Inc. doesn't have any competitive advantage over its competitors. After analyzing four
building block, we see that Snap Inc. is doing well in terms of innovation but their efficiency,
quality and consumer responsiveness are pretty low compared to others (facebook, instagrm) and
from the financial analysis we found out that the company is incurring significant loss in the past
3 years that means it's not being able to use its distinctive competencies properly and devise proper
16 | P a g e
Value Chain Analysis
Company Infrastructure
and benefits
• Keeps customers
Focuses on • Software and • Advertising
updated with news and
product App • Sale of
events via snaps sent
development, Development Spectacle
directly to user
advertising • Smartglass through online
inboxes, its blog and
technology, and called retail outlets twitter account.
large-scale ‘Spectacle’ • Collaboration • Website community
Business model
infrastructure production with celebrities, section with user
• Licensed Ad partners
to facilitate advertisers.
Business Model & Canvas
18 | P a g e
References
1. ANDERSON, A. S. (2018, Mar 01). Social Media Use in 2018. Retrieved from
http://www.pewinternet.org: http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-
use-in-2018/
2. BSIC. (2017, MAR 12). Snapchat’s IPO – analysis and implications. Retrieved from
http://www.bsic.it: http://www.bsic.it/snapchats-ipo-analysis-implications/
4. Carnette, J. (2018). Better Buy: Twitter vs. Snap Inc. Retrieved from
https://www.fool.com/investing/2018/03/28/better-buy-twitter-vs-snap-inc.aspx
5. Chaffey, D. (2018, Mar 28). Global social media research summary 2018. Retrieved from
smartinsights.com: https://www.smartinsights.com/social-media-marketing/social-
media-strategy/new-global-social-media-research/
6. Cho, A. (2018). Snap Vs. Facebook: Which Platform Is Winning More Users?. Retrieved
from https://seekingalpha.com/article/4053182-snap-vs-facebook-platform-winning-
users
7. Edwards, J. (2017, feb 3). SECRECY, CONTROL AND 'KINDNESS': What the Snapchat IPO
tells us about its corporate culture. Retrieved from http://uk.businessinsider.com:
http://uk.businessinsider.com/snapchat-ipo-company-culture-2017-2
8. Gallagher, B. (2018). A Tale Of Two Patents: Why Facebook Can’t Clone Snapchat.
Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2014/06/22/facebook-slingshot-snapchat-
patents/
9. Hartung, A. (2018). Why Is Snapchat Worth $20B? The Value Of Implementing Trends.
Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamhartung/2016/05/27/why-is-
snapchat-worth-20b-the-value-of-implementing-trends/#4b463cfc2b82
19 | P a g e
10. Kirkpatrick, D., & Adams, P. (2018). Snap Inc. touts vision as camera company on
investor roadshow. Retrieved from https://www.marketingdive.com/news/snap-inc-
touts-vision-as-camera-company-on-investor-roadshow/436540/
11. Leswing, K. (2018). Snap says Apple is a competitor. Retrieved from
http://www.businessinsider.com/snap-competition-apple-facebook-instagram-google-
twitter-2017-2
12. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(form 10-Q) | 4-Traders. (2018). Retrieved from http://www.4-traders.com/SNAP-INC-
34091150/news/SNAP-Management-s-Discussion-and-Analysis-of-Financial-Condition-
and-Results-of-Operations-form-1-24930246/
13. Matthies, N., & Parvin, S. (n.d.). An Evaluation of Snap Inc. and its Recent Decision to Go
Public.
14. Pierson, D., & Lien, T. (2018). Los Angeles Times - We are currently unavailable in your
region. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/business/technology/la-fi-tn-snap-
layoffs-costs-20180308-story.html
15. Privacy Policy. (2017, May 15). Retrieved from www.snap.com:
https://www.snap.com/en-US/privacy/privacy-policy/
16. Robischon, N. (2018). The Failure That Led Snap Inc. To Its Business Model. Retrieved
from https://www.fastcompany.com/3067854/the-failure-that-led-snap-inc-to-its-
business-model
17. Snap Inc. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.snap.com/en-US/
18. Ting, S. X. (2017, Jul 26). An overview of SnapChat. Retrieved from
https://www.sitiac.com: https://www.sitiac.com/single-post/2017/07/26/An-overview-
of-SnapChat
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/SnapS1-02022017.pdf
20 | P a g e
20. Caplan, D. (2018). Snapchat vs Facebook and The Essence of Competitive Strategy.
21. Dua, T. (2018). Snapchat still has a solid advantage over its competitors in one key area.
but-discover-still-provides-it-a-solid-advantage-over-competitors-2017-8
22. Dave, P. (2017). Los Angeles Times - We are currently unavailable in your region.
acquisitions-20170510-htmlstory.html
23. Willee, M. (2017). Snapchat Files Trademarks as Part of IP Protection Strategy. Retrieved
from https://blog.traklight.com/snapchat-trademark-ip-protection-strategy
24. Flynn, K. (2017). Our first look at Snapchat's biggest risks and most powerful enemies.
25. L. Wrigley, Divisional Autonomy and Diversification (PhD, Harvard Business School,
1970)
27. Wang, K. (2017). Snap Inc. To End 2017 With No Profit In Sight. Retrieved from
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4129255-snap-inc-end-2017-profit-sight
28. Henderson, E. (2018). Gone in a Snap: Snap Inc.’s IPO [Ebook] (pp. 477-497). Boston
https://www.bu.edu/rbfl/files/2017/09/P493.pdf
21 | P a g e
22 | P a g e