Professional Documents
Culture Documents
fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2019.2905976, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
1
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
Guo-Ping Gao, Member, IEEE, Chen Yang, Student Member, IEEE, Bin Hu, Senior Member, IEEE,
Rui-Feng Zhang, Student Member, IEEE, and Shao-Fei Wang, Student Member, IEEE
0018-926X (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2019.2905976, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
2
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
(a) (b)
Fig. 3. (a) Configuration and electric field distributions for different resonance
Fig. 2. Photographs of the fabricated antenna. modes of Ant1. (b) S11 of Ant1.
TABLE I
DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED ANTENNA IN FIG. 1
Parameter Value (mm) Parameter Value (mm)
L 20 Lp 14
W 26.7 Dp 20
Dv 3 Ls 19
H 2 Ws 2
(a) (b)
Lg 36 Ds 16.9
Wg 46 Fx 5.8
r 1
0018-926X (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2019.2905976, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
3
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
Fig. 6. Two resonance frequencies and their frequency ratio (f2/f1) as a function Fig. 9. Simulated input impedance of the proposed antenna.
of Lp/L for the proposed antenna.
(a) (b)
Fig. 10. Schematic diagrams of the simulated electric field distribution
underneath the patch of the proposed antenna at (a) 5.30 GHz. (b) 5.85 GHz.
Fig. 7. Two resonance frequencies and their frequency ratio (f2/f1) as a function
of Ds/W for the proposed antenna.
0018-926X (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2019.2905976, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
4
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
Fig. 12. S11 of the proposed antenna in free space and on human model. (a)
Fig. 13. Measured S11 of the proposed antenna placed on real human tissues. (b)
A. S11 parameter Fig. 14. Simulated S11 of the proposed antenna. (a) Bent along the x-axis. (b)
Bent along the y-axis.
The measured and simulated S11 curves of the proposed antenna
placed in free space are shown in Fig. 12. The measured -10 dB
impedance bandwidth is 990 MHz (5.05 GHz to 6.04 GHz) with a
fractional bandwidth of 18.0%, while the simulated bandwidth is 850
MHz (5.14 GHz to 5.99 GHz). The difference between these values is
mainly due to fabrication errors. Notice that both results can cover the
band of 5.15 GHz to 5.825 GHz, which ensures that the proposed
antenna can meet the requirements for 5-GHz WLAN applications.
Moreover, the simulated S11 of the proposed antenna on the human
model is also displayed in this figure. The -10 dB impedance
bandwidth is 850 MHz (5.13 GHz to 5.98 GHz), which still meets the
requirement.
Fig. 15. Normalized radiation patterns of the proposed antenna at 5.5 GHz.
Fig. 13 shows the experimental setup and measured S11 of the
proposed antenna placed in free space and clinging to real human
tissues, including arm, chest, and leg. The S11 curves on different B. Radiation patterns
human tissues differ slightly from the S11 result when the antenna is The measured radiation patterns of the proposed antenna placed in
placed in free space. The measured -10 dB impedance bandwidth can free space are compared to the simulated patterns in Fig. 15
cover the 5-GHz WLAN band under all conditions. In addition, the (normalized to the max value of gain in the E-plane and H-plane,
simulated S11 on the human model is in good agreement with the respectively). Small differences between the measured and simulated
measured S11 on real human tissues, which verifies the reliability of the values may be attributed to the fabrication error. The measured
human model. radiation patterns show that this antenna can achieve a front-to-back
To further verify its suitability for wearable systems, the antenna ratio (FBR) of more than 9 dB in the E-plane. It is also noted that the
was simulated under the two bending conditions in which the antenna antenna has a half power beam width (HPBW) over 150° in the
was bent around a cylinder with a radius of R along the x-axis and
H-plane (xz-plane) and 118°in the E-plane (yz-plane). A decrease in
along the y-axis. Fig. 14 shows S11 for each bending configuration used
the backward radiation of this antenna placed on a human model in
in the simulations. It can be observed that the resonance frequencies
both planes can be seen in this figure. Due to the influence of the
decrease when the antenna is bent along the x-axis or y-axis. Compared
with the flat antenna, the resonance frequencies and impedance human model, the FBR in the E-plane is more than 20 dB. It is also
bandwidth of the bent antenna change slightly. Note that the -10 dB noted that the HPBW changes from 150°to 83°in the H-plane and
impedance bandwidth can cover the 5-GHz WLAN band as the from 118°to 123°in the E-plane. In addition, the cross-polarization of
bending radius R decreases from 50 mm to 30 mm (typical bending the antenna on the human model is below -16 dB in the H-plane and
radii for wearable systems). Therefore, this antenna can maintain -20 dB in the E-plane.
stability while being bent.
0018-926X (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2019.2905976, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
5
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
V. CONCLUSION
A wide bandwidth wearable PIFA for the 5-GHz WLAN
applications is proposed. The measured results are in good agreement
with the simulated results. The antenna has a measured −10 dB
fractional bandwidth of 18.0% in the 5-GHz WLAN band, which is far
Fig. 16. Gain and efficiency of the proposed antenna.
larger than that of some other 5-GHz WLAN wearable antennas, as
listed in Table II. The FBR of the antenna is more than 9 dB in the
E-plane and the HPBW is over 150°in the H-plane and over 118°in
the E-plane. At the same time, the antenna possesses a measured
average gain of 4.1 dBi, a peak gain of 5.9 dBi, and an average
efficiency up to 74.1%. The S11 curves of the antenna on different
human tissues or under different bending conditions can cover the
designed band. Moreover, the SAR values prove that the proposed
antenna meets the SAR requirements under both U.S. and EUR
averages. In other words, the proposed antenna is suitable for wearable
systems.
Fig. 17. SAR results of the proposed antenna at 5.5 GHz.
TABLE II REFERENCES
COMPARISON OF THE PROPOSED ANTENNA AND SOME OTHERWEARABLE [1] M. A. Chung and C. F. Yang, “Built-in antenna design for 2.4 GHz
ANTENNAS USED IN 5-GHZ WLAN BAND ISM band and GPS operations in a wrist-worn wireless
Peak communication device”, IET Microw. Antennas Propag., vol. 10, no.
Area Profile f0 BW Size 12, pp. 1285-1291, Sep. 2016.
Ref. gain
(mm× mm) (mm) (GHz) (MHz) comparison [2] T. Björninen and F. Yang, “Low-profile head-worn antenna with a
(dBi)
370 monopole-like radiation pattern”, IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag.
[2] 40.15×40.15 7 5.8 0 341% Lett., vol. 15, pp. 794-797, Mar. 2016.
(6.4%)
230 [3] X. M. Hu, S. Yan, and G. A. E. Vandenbosch, “Wearable button
[21] 75×42 1 5.8 3.12 95% antenna for dual-band WLAN applications with combined on and
(4.0%)
709 off-body radiation patterns”, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 65,
[22] 39.80×39.80 3.92 5.8 6.50 188% no. 3, pp. 1384-1387, Mar. 2017.
(12.2%)
590 [4] A. Ruaro, J. Thaysen, and K. B. Jakobsen, “Wearable shell antenna
[23] 30×30 8 5.3 5.10 217% for 2.4 GHz hearing instruments”, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag.,
(11.1%)
280 vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 2127-2135, Jun. 2016.
[24] 41×48 1 5.8 1.12 59% [5] S. W. Su and Y. T. Hsieh, “Integrated metal-frame antenna for
(4.8%)
This 940 smartwatch wearable device”, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol.
46×36 2 5.5 5.90 100% 63, no. 7, pp. 3301-3305, Jul. 2015.
work (18.0%)
[6] B. Hu, G. P. Gao, L. L. He, X. D. Cong, and J. N. Zhao, “Bending
C. Antenna gain and efficiency and on-arm effects on a wearable antenna for 2.45 GHz body area
network”, IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 15, pp.
The antenna gain in free space is presented in Fig. 16, which has an 378-381, Feb. 2016.
increasing trend within the operating band. There is good agreement [7] D.Ferreira, P. Pires, R. Rodrigues, and R. F. S. Caldeirinha,
between the simulated and measured results, and the differences “Wearable textile antennas examining the effect of bending on their
between the results are mainly due to fabrication errors and cable performance”, IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 59, no. 3, pp.
losses. The measured average gain is 4.1 dBi with an average 54-59, Jun. 2017.
[8] M. A. B. Abbasi, S. Nikolaou, M. A. Antoniades, M. N. Stevanovi´c,
efficiency of 74.1%. Moreover, the peak gain of 5.9 dBi is obtained at
and P. Vryonides, “Compact EBG-backed planar monopole for
5.73 GHz. There is a significant increase in the antenna gain in BAN wearable applications”, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol.
5.15-5.5 GHz band when this antenna is placed on the human model. 65, no. 2, pp. 453-463, Feb. 2017.
The simulated average gain of the antenna on the human model is 5.0 [9] H. R. Raad, A. I. Abbosh, H. M. Al-Rizzo, and D. G. Rucker,
dBi. Considering all possible losses, the average efficiency of the “Flexible and compact AMC based antenna for telemedicine
antenna on the human model is up to 64.2% in the simulation, which is applications”, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 61, no. 2, pp.
12.5% lower than the simulated efficiency in free space and is due to 524-531, Feb. 2013.
the presence of the human model. [10] M. L. Scarpello, I. Kazani, C. Hertleer, H. Rogier, and D. V. Ginste,
“Stability and efficiency of screen-printed wearable and washable
D. SAR evaluation antennas”, IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 11, pp.
838-841, Jul. 2012.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) level of the proposed antenna [11] G. P. Gao, B. Hu, X. L. Tian, Q. L. Zhao, and B. T. Zhang,
was investigated numerically to ensure conformance to the FCC’s and “Experimental study of a wearable aperture-coupled patch antenna
ICNIRP’s guidelines on human exposure to radio-frequency fields. for wireless body area network”, Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett., vol.
The proposed antenna was placed 10 mm above the model. 54, no. 4, pp. 761-766, Apr. 2017.
[12] H. Carla, T. Anneleen, R. Hendrik, V. Luigi, and V. L. Lieva,
The simulated SAR distributions of the proposed antenna at 5.5 “Aperture-coupled patch antenna for integration into wearable
GHz under 1 g average and 10 g average are presented in Fig. 17.
0018-926X (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TAP.2019.2905976, IEEE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation
6
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION
0018-926X (c) 2018 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.