Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IN BRIEF
• From a portfolio perspective, exposure to tech winners in U.S. equities is not a free
lunch. The same growth stories that prompted outsize U.S. equity returns in recent
years and a faster recovery from the COVID-19 shock make the U.S. a higher volatility,
higher beta market, at least for now.
• The shift is a symptom of rising market concentration, which reflects the potentially
powerful influences of investor crowding, swings in sentiment and high valuations,
along with business fundamentals.
• We still score U.S. equities as an overweight, and like its tech exposure in combination
with cyclical equity markets including emerging markets and Europe.
AUTHORS • Given the S&P 500’s reduced defensiveness, and the fact that bond yields are pinned
down by monetary policy, it has become more difficult to find effective portfolio
hedges.
Has rising stock market concentration upended this unambiguous support for U.S.
equities? Concentration is certainly an acute issue in the S&P 500, which has seen a huge
rise in the proportion of its value accounted by just a handful of megacap tech stocks —
precisely the area of the market that sparked equity volatility over the past few weeks. In
our view, acknowledging this higher concentration and volatility requires an increasingly
balanced approach to investing in the U.S., one weighing the market’s leverage to long-
term growth stories against its more limited defensive characteristics.
Benjamin Mandel
Executive Director
Global Strategist
Multi-Asset Solutions
MULTI-ASSET SOLUTIONS WEEKLY STRATEGY REPORT
A vulnerability of concentrated markets: U.S. tech stocks had moderately outpaced other regions’
Tech-driven volatility tech sectors for much of this year, this outperformance
accelerated markedly in the latter half of August, before
This year’s U.S. market outperformance and its faster
sharply reversing in September. The tech stock gains
recovery from the March lows has largely reflected the
seemingly coincided with increased buying of bullish
strong performance of a small band of popular winning
exposure through equity options (market participants
stocks. Before the volatility that began in early
continue to debate the extent to which this was driven by
September, the top five largest stocks in the benchmark
a new wave of retail investors or increased institutional
U.S. index accounted for around a quarter of its total
activity in the space). The surge in options trading also at
value — an all-time high. Their shares at that point had
least partly explains the odd phenomenon of a strongly
risen by over 50% year-to-date, while the overall market
rising equity market alongside metrics of increased
had gained just 11%.
implied volatility, driven by options market pricing. This
Without taking a view on whether or not these share price was not just a U.S. occurrence, but it was more
gains were fully justified by long-run business pronounced in the U.S. market and at this point, headline
fundamentals, we believe this rapid rise left the overall volatility metrics remain elevated compared with other
U.S. market heavily exposed to any change in investors’ regions (e.g. VIX at 26, vs. the Eurostoxx V2X at 22), and
bullish view on these stocks. And while today’s U.S. tech even more so in the tech-dominated Nasdaq (VXN at
champions have successful and highly profitable business 35%).
models — many growing their profits throughout the
To be sure, this is not the first time concentration has
COVID-19 crisis — the extreme investor crowding has
become an issue in the U.S. market. Many investors recall
stoked valuations that seem at least superficially very
the late 1990s tech bubble and, back in the 1960s and
high, leaving stock prices vulnerable to swings in
1970s, the “Nifty Fifty” group of expensive large cap
potentially overheated investor sentiment.
stocks that dominated the U.S. equity market. However,
Exacerbating the issue has been the role of equity the current degree of concentration exceeds both of those
derivative markets in the U.S. tech- stock run-up. While episodes. More ominously, perhaps, neither of the earlier
EXHIBIT 1: EQUITY MARKET EXPOSURES TO THE ‘WORKING FROM HOME’ (WFH) THEME
Winner
30.5% 12.2% 0.6% -3.6% -4.1% -33.1% 18.9%
- Loser
Source: Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan Asset Management Multi-Asset Solutions; data through July 2020.
For illustrative purposes only.
2 Multi-Ass et Solutio ns
MULTI-ASSET SOLUTIONS WEEKLY STRATEGY REPORT
periods lasted, and in both instances extended valuations The relative losers are predominantly those in sectors
were forced to unwind — pretty spectacularly when the where spending is displaced by the changes in economic
tech bubble burst in 2000. activity (e.g., office and retail REITS, automobiles, energy
and industrial materials, airlines, tourism, hotels). Adding
A benefit of concentrated markets:
up the market weights of the industry winners and losers
Exposure to winners
illustrates the significant concentration of economic
The bright side of market concentration is that it gives exposures in the S&P 500, and also the large disparities in
equity winners an unimpeded run. A subset of the tech those exposures across markets (Exhibit 1).
winners, and a very concrete example of how
concentration differentiates markets, is the S&P’s ASSET CLASS IMPLICATIONS
exposure to virtual lifestyle stocks. Our recent research on Ultimately the S&P’s underlying fundamentals make it a
working from home (WFH) attempts to quantify both the compelling overweight in our global equity allocations,
size of the economic trend and the gearing of financial even at relatively rich valuations. But market
markets to it.1 The primary effect of WFH for equities is a concentration informs our thinking in two important ways.
tailwind for companies that provide the hardware and First, higher volatility affects the sizing of U.S. positions,
software tools to enhance home productivity (e.g., which will ratchet down in portfolios with a fixed overall
computer hardware and software, semiconductors and risk budget. Second, the prospect of tech stocks leading
electronic components, cable and telecommunications, an equity downturn is a significant impairment in the
consumer digital services); ancillary services (e.g., cyber index’s defensive nature, amplifying the fact that
security, industrial REITS, professional business support) monetary policy has quashed Treasury volatility, making
and other beneficiaries of the spending reallocations that bonds less responsive to swings in equity prices. These
result (e.g., home improvement, household furnishings changes in asset class correlations mean that portfolio
and appliances, electronic entertainment, delivery hedges are harder to come by. That has led us to seek out
services). diversification in credit, which benefits from implicit and
explicit guarantees from the Federal Reserve, and in more
1 See: Benjamin Mandel, Mallika Saran and Patrick Lenihan, “The balanced equity allocations across the U.S., emerging
global ‘work from home’ labor force: Market implications of skill- markets and Europe. In some cases, too, we simply take
biased tech adoption and lower urban density,” Portfolio Insights,
J.P. Morgan Asset Management, June 2020. more moderate levels of risk in our multi-asset portfolios.
J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide.
To the extent permitted by applicable law, we may record telephone calls and monitor electronic communications to comply with our legal and regulatory obligations and
internal policies. Personal data will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with our privacy policies at
https://am.jpmorgan.com/global/privacy.
This communication is issued by the following entities: In the United States, by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. or J.P. Morgan Alternative Asset Management, Inc.,
both regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission; in Latin America, for intended recipients’ use only, by local J.P. Morgan entities, as the case may be. In Canada, for
institutional clients’ use only, by JPMorgan Asset Management (Canada) Inc., which is a registered Portfolio Manager and Exempt Market Dealer in all Canadian provinces and
territories except the Yukon and is also registered as an Investment Fund Manager in British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador. In the United
Kingdom, by JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited, which is authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority; in other European jurisdictions, by JPMorgan
Asset Management (Europe) S.à r.l. In Asia Pacific (“APAC”), by the following issuing entities and in the respective jurisdictions in which they are primarily regulated: JPMorgan
Asset Management (Asia Pacific) Limited, or JPMorgan Funds (Asia) Limited, or JPMorgan Asset Management Real Assets (Asia) Limited, each of which is regulated by the
Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong; JPMorgan Asset Management (Singapore) Limited (Co. Reg. No. 197601586K), this advertisement or publication has not been
reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore; JPMorgan Asset Management (Taiwan) Limited; JPMorgan Asset Management (Japan) Limited, which is a member of the
Investment Trusts Association, Japan, the Japan Investment Advisers Association, Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association and the Japan Securities Dealers Association
and is regulated by the Financial Services Agency (registration number “Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Financial Instruments Firm) No. 330”); in Australia, to wholesale clients
only as defined in section 761A and 761G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Commonwealth), by JPMorgan Asset Management (Australia) Limited (ABN 55143832080) (AFSL
376919). For all other markets in APAC, to intended recipients only.
For U.S. only: If you are a person with a disability and need additional support in viewing the material, please call us at 1-800-343-1113 for assistance.
Copyright 2020 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved.
PI-AA-WEEKLY-092120 | 0903c02a81f59f1d