Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In all the EPC project which are been executed on 3D model, it is planned to have 3 formal model
reviews at Stages 30%, 60% and 90% of design completion. These stages are linked to the project
schedule in respect of the supply of engineering information from upstream disciplines (Process,
Mechanical, Instruments etc.) being at a status of Preliminary, Intermediate and Final.
The objective of model review is to “freeze” the design at each of these stages, i.e. once comments
from a specific review are resolved, the scope of facilities covered in that review will be frozen.
Below is the check point which shall be reviewed prior to 30% 3D model review:
Page 1 of 9
PROJECT NAME : CLIENT :
PROJECT NO. : DOCUMENT NO. :
AREA OR WBS NAME : REV. : DATE : DD-MM-YYYY
60% 3D model review is an intermediate review which take place when the final structural steel, final
equipment and the majority of the major piping runs, duct-work, instrument and electrical trays have
been MODELLED. The primary purpose of these reviews is to review the routings to insure that
process integrity has not been compromised, that the pipe, duct-work and tray runs are in accordance
with the minimum criteria established for the project and to observe any potential interference in the
operability or maintainability, created by the routing of these items.
Below is the check point which shall be reviewed prior to 60% 3D model review:
Page 3 of 9
PROJECT NAME : CLIENT :
PROJECT NO. : DOCUMENT NO. :
AREA OR WBS NAME : REV. : DATE : DD-MM-YYYY
Page 6 of 9
PROJECT NAME : CLIENT :
PROJECT NO. : DOCUMENT NO. :
AREA OR WBS NAME : REV. : DATE : DD-MM-YYYY
90% 3D model review held when the 3D model has basically been completed. This occurs when all
equipment, piping, valves, instruments, electrical, structural and other items have been modeled in 3D
environment. In this review, the items to be reviewed will include such things as the location and
orientation of valve hand wheels for operability, the location of local instruments for maintainability.
Agreement on the location of all these critical items should precede the start of piping isometrics
EXTRACTION or the preparation of instrument location plan drawings, if required.
Below is the check point which shall be reviewed prior to 90% 3D model review:
Instructions for filling the check list for 90% model review:
1. This list is not intended for use in milestone reviews, it is for ensuring that the model is ready for the
mile stone review and therefore it is required to be completed and signed before proceeding for
milestone review.
2. Many check points in the check list do not specify the criteria or basis for checking. The points are
listed with the intention to cover the full scope of model and that there are no miss-outs before
proceeding for mile stone review. Separate check prints of points need to be maintained by Area
Designers, Lead Designers and Area engineers to support the readiness of the model review.
3. This check list is to be prepared by piping Lead Designer for each area or WBS separately.
4. Though this check list is prepared by piping Lead Designer and checked by piping Area Engineer, it
requires input from many disciplines. In such cases the piping lead designer has to obtain the
confirmation from the designer of the respective discipline.
Page 9 of 9