Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INSURANCE CODE
(P.D. No. 1460)
Most of the terms of the contract do between the parties as they are prescribed
not result from mutual negotiations by the insurer in final printed form to
COMMERCIAL LAW COMMITTEE
CHAIRPERSON: Garny Luisa Alegre ASST. CHAIRPERSON:Jayson O’S Ramos EDP: Beatrix I. Ramos SUBJECT HEADS:
Marichelle De Vera (Negotiable Instruments Law); Jose Fernando Llave (Insurance); Aldrich Del Rosario (Transportation Laws);
Shirley Mae Tabangcura, Bon Vincent Agustin (Corporation Law); Karl Steven Co (Special Laws); John Lemuel Gatdula (Banking Laws);
Robespierre CU (Law on Intellectual Property)
San Beda College of Law 2
MEMORY AID IN COMMERCIAL LAW
Binding Receipt
A mere acknowledgment on behalf of
the company that its branch office had
received from the applicant the insurance premium and had accepted the
COMMERCIAL LAW COMMITTEE
CHAIRPERSON: Garny Luisa Alegre ASST. CHAIRPERSON:Jayson O’S Ramos EDP: Beatrix I. Ramos SUBJECT HEADS:
Marichelle De Vera (Negotiable Instruments Law); Jose Fernando Llave (Insurance); Aldrich Del Rosario (Transportation Laws);
Shirley Mae Tabangcura, Bon Vincent Agustin (Corporation Law); Karl Steven Co (Special Laws); John Lemuel Gatdula (Banking Laws);
Robespierre CU (Law on Intellectual Property)
San Beda College of Law 3
MEMORY AID IN COMMERCIAL LAW
taken by a lessee over his merchandise, providing for such automatic assignment is
and the provision in the lease contract void for being contrary to law and public
COMMERCIAL LAW COMMITTEE
CHAIRPERSON: Garny Luisa Alegre ASST. CHAIRPERSON:Jayson O’S Ramos EDP: Beatrix I. Ramos SUBJECT HEADS:
Marichelle De Vera (Negotiable Instruments Law); Jose Fernando Llave (Insurance); Aldrich Del Rosario (Transportation Laws);
Shirley Mae Tabangcura, Bon Vincent Agustin (Corporation Law); Karl Steven Co (Special Laws); John Lemuel Gatdula (Banking Laws);
Robespierre CU (Law on Intellectual Property)
San Beda College of Law 6
MEMORY AID IN COMMERCIAL LAW
WARRANTY REPRESENTATION
Part of the contract Mere collateral
inducement
Written on the May be written in
policy, actually or by the policy or may
reference be oral.
Presumed material Must be proved to
be material
Must be strictly Requires only
complied with substantial truth
and compliance
RESCISSION
Grounds:
A. Concealment
B. Misrepresentation
C. Breach of material warranty
D. Breach of a condition subsequent
Waiver of the right to rescind:
Acceptance of premium payments
despite the knowledge of the ground for
rescission. (Sec. 45)
Limitations on the right of the
insurer to rescind:
insured. It is lawful and specifically allowed under Sec. 75 which provides that
COMMERCIAL LAW COMMITTEE
CHAIRPERSON: Garny Luisa Alegre ASST. CHAIRPERSON:Jayson O’S Ramos EDP: Beatrix I. Ramos SUBJECT HEADS:
Marichelle De Vera (Negotiable Instruments Law); Jose Fernando Llave (Insurance); Aldrich Del Rosario (Transportation Laws);
Shirley Mae Tabangcura, Bon Vincent Agustin (Corporation Law); Karl Steven Co (Special Laws); John Lemuel Gatdula (Banking Laws);
Robespierre CU (Law on Intellectual Property)
San Beda College of Law 13
MEMORY AID IN COMMERCIAL LAW
TERMS:
1. Reinsurance treaty – Merely an
agreement between two insurance
companies whereby one agrees to cede
and the other to accept reinsurance
business pursuant to provisions specified
in the treaty. (Prof. De Leon, p. 306)
the insured acquires an interest in the insurance contract which may be garnished
like any other credit. (Perla Comapnia
de Seguro, Inc vs. Ramolete, 205 SCRA “INTENTIONAL” vs. “ACCIDENTAL” AS
487) USED IN INSURANCE POLICIES
Aside from compulsory motor vehicle 1. Intentional – Implies the exercise of
liability insurance, the Insurance Code the reasoning faculties, consciousness
contains no other provisions applicable and volition. Where a provision of the
to casualty insurance. Therefore, such policy excludes intentional injury, it is
casualty insurance are governed by the the intention of the person inflicting the
general provisions applicable to all types injury that is controlling. If the injuries
of insurance, and outside of such suffered by the insured clearly resulted
statutory provisions, the rights and from the intentional act of the third
obligations of the parties must be person, the insurer is relieve from
determined by their contract, taking into liability as stipulated. (Biagtan v. the
consideration its purpose and always in Insular Life Assurance Co. Ltd., 44 SCRA
accordance with the general principles 58, 1972)
of insurance law. 2. Accidental – That which happens by
chance or fortuitously, without intention
In burglary, robbery and theft or design, which is unexpected, unusual
insurance, the opportunity to defraud and unforeseen.
the insurer – the moral hazard – is so
great that insurer have found it NO ACTION CLAUSE
necessary to fill up the policies with A requirement in a policy of liability
many restrictions designed to reduce the insurance which provides that suit and
hazard. Persons frequently excluded are final judgment be first obtained against
those in the insured’s service and the insured; that only thereafter can the
employment. The purpose of the person injured recover on the policy.
exception is to guard against liability (Guingon vs. Del Monte, 20 SCRA 1043)
should theft be committed by one having
unrestricted access to the property. XIX. COMPULSORY MOTOR VEHICLE
(Fortune Insurance vs. CA, 244 SCRA 208) LIABILITY INSURANCE (CMVLI)
A species of compulsory insurance
Right of a third party injured to sue that provides for protection coverage
the insurer that will answer for legal liability for
1. Indemnity against liability – A third losses and damages for bodily injuries or
party injured can directly sue the property damage that may be sustained
insurer. by another arising from the use and
2. Indemnity for actual loss or operation of motor vehicle by its owner.
reimbursement after actual payment by Purpose: To give immediate financial
the insured – A third party has no cause assistance to victims of motor vehicle
of action against the insurer (Sec. 53, accidents and/or their dependents,
Bonifacio Bros. v. Mora, 20 SCRA 261). especially if they are poor regardless of
the financial capability of motor vehicle
The insurer is not solidarily liable with owners or operators responsible for the
the insured. The insurer’s liability is accident sustained (Shafer v. Judge,
based on contract; that of the insured is RTC, 167 SCRA 386).
based on torts. Furthermore, the Claimants/victims may be a
insurer’s liability is limited by the “passenger” or a “3rd party”
amount of the insurance coverage (Pan It applies to all vehicles whether
Malayan Insurance Corporation v. CA, public and private vehicles.
184 SCRA 54). Note: It is the only compulsory insurance
coverage under the Insurance Code.
B. Theft Clause
A clause which includes theft as
among the risks insured against.
Where the car is unlawfully and
wrongfully taken without the owner’s
consent or knowledge, such taking
constitutes theft, and thus, it is the
“theft clause” and not the “authorized
driver clause that should apply (Palermo
v. Pyramids Ins., 161 SCRA 677).
Pacific Life Assurance Corp. vs. Court of Appeals, 316 SCRA 677)
1. Accidental killing
LIABILITY OF INSURER IN CERTAIN 2. Self-defense
CAUSES OF DEATH OF INSURED 3.Insanity of the beneficiary at the
1. Suicide time he killed the insured
Insurer is liable in the following cases:
1. If committed after two years If the premiums paid came from
from the date of the policy’s conjugal funds, the proceeds are
issue or its last reinstatement; considered conjugal. If the beneficiary is
2. If committed in a state of other than the insured’s estate, the source
insanity regardless of the date of of premiums would not be relevant. (Del
the commission unless suicide is Val v. Del Val, 29 Phil 534)
an excepted peril. (Sec. 180-A)
3. If committed after a shorter
period provided in the policy
Any stipulation extending the 2-year
period is null and void.
2. At the hands of the law (E.g. by legal
execution)
It is one of the risks assumed by the
insurer under a life insurance policy in
the absence of a valid policy exception.
(Vance,p.572 cited in de Leon, p. 107)
Note: Justice Vitug believes that death
by suicide (if the insured is sane) or at
the hands of the law obviates against
recovery as being more in consonance
with public policy and as being implicit
under Section 87, ICP. (Pandect of
Commercial Law and
Jurisprudence, 1997 ed. P.
191)
3. Killing by the beneficiary
GENERAL RULE: The interest of a
beneficiary in a life insurance policy
shall be forfeited when the beneficiary is
the principal accomplice or accessory in
willfully bringing about the death of the
insured, in which event, the nearest
relative of the insured shall receive the
proceeds of said insurance if not
otherwise disqualified. (Sec. 12)
EXCEPTIONS:
The measure of indemnity in life or
health insurance policy is the sum
fixed in the policy except when a
creditor insures the life of his debtor.
(Sec. 183) IS THE CONSENT OF THE
BENEFICIARY NECESSARY TO THE
ASSIGNMENT OF A LIFE INSURANCE
POLICY?
It depends. If the designation of the
beneficiary is irrevocable, the
beneficiary’s consent is essential
because of his vested right. If the
designation is revocable, the policy
may be assigned without such consent
because the beneficiary only has a
mere expectancy to the proceeds.
(The Insurance Code of the Philippines
Annotated, Hector de Leon, 2002 ed.)