Sisay PCR

LIST OF ACRONYMS
AO - Assisting Organization
AP - Assisting Professional
ASU - Administrative Staff Unit
BERDFI - Basilan Environment Resources Development
Foundation, Inc.
CAFSI - Citizen Association for Forest Succession, Inc.
CBFMA - Community-Based Forest Management
Agreement
CENRO - Community Environment and Natural Resources
Office
CRMF - Community Resource Management Framework
CSD - Comprehensive Site Development
CO - Community Organizing
COSU - Community Organizing and Strengthening Unit
DENR - Department of Environment and Natural
Resources
GASALBO - Gamut Ug Salingsing Sa Bohol, Inc.
IPBA - Institutional Project Benefit Assessment
KFI - Kasanyangan Foundation, Inc.
LGU - Local Government Unit
MACWMPAI - Makasanyang Community Watershed Multi-
Purpose Association, Inc.
M&E - Monitoring and Evaluation
NGO - Non-Government Organization
PENRO - Provincial Environment and Natural Resources
Office
PO - Peoples Organization
RO - Regional Office
RTAI - Renewed Tribal Association, Inc.
SDMU - Site Development and Management Unit
SMP - Survey, Mapping, and Planning
SUSIMO - Subproject Site Management Office
VBU - Validating and Billing Unit
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ------------------------------------------------------------- i
I. Subproject Description ------------------------------------------------------ 1

1. Purpose/ Objectives
2. Subproject Scope and Dimension
A. Comparison of Original and
Actual Scope and Dimensions
B. Reasons for Revision/ Modification
Of Scope and Dimensions
C. Contribution of Subproject to
Relevant (Sub) Sectors
II. Subproject Implementation ----------------------------------------------- 13

1. Organizations for Implementing
Subproject
2. Implementation Period
3. Subproject Cost
4. Comments on Performance of
AO, AP, PO, M&E, and Infra Contractors
5. Other Matters Relating to
Subproject Implementation
III. Action taken by the AO, AP, and PO ------------------------------------ 29

Relating to Recommendation(s)
IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance

Of the Subproject Facilities --------------------------------------------- 30
1. Present Condition of Facilities
2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance
3. Annual Budget or Actual Expenditure
For Operation and Maintenance (by year)
4. Maintenance Method
V. Benefits Derived from the Project ---------------------------------------- 44

1. Indirect Effects
VI. Conclusions and Recommendations ---------------------------------------- 46

LIST OF TABLES:
Table 1 : Trainings Attended by the PO ----------------------------------------- 48
Table 2 : Subproject Performance ---------------------------------------------- 49
Table 3 : Subproject Site Management Office Equipments -------------------- 50
Table 4 : Trainings Attended by the SUSIMO --------------------------------- 51
Table 5a : Rice Trading Livelihood Project of the PO--------------------------- 52
Table 5b : Sawali Trading Livelihood Project of the PO------------------------ 53
Table 6 : Subproject Status Report --------------------------------------------- 54
Table 7 : SMP Cost Estimate Per Activity -------------------------------------- 55
Table 8 : Community Organizing Cost Estimate Per Activity ------------------ 56
Table 9a : Cost Estimate for Agroforestry Per Activity ----------------------- 57
Table 9b : Cost Estimate for Bamboo Plantation Per Activity------------------ 58
Table 9c : Cost Estimate for Rattan Plantation Per Activity ------------------ 59
Table 9d : Cost Estimate for Tree Plantation/ Reforestation Per activity ---- 60
Table 9e : Cost Estimate for Rubber Plantation Per Activity ----------------- 61
Table 10 : Monitoring and Evaluation Cost Estimate ---------------------------- 62
Table 11 : Infrastructure Project ----------------------------------------------- 63
Table 12 : Annual Work and Financial Plan -------------------------------------- 64
ANNEXES:
1. Organizational Structure ------------------------------------------------ 68

1a. SMP
1b1-1b2. CO
1c. PO
1d. M&E contractor
1e. SUSIMO
1f. Infrastructure
2. Pictures --------------------------------------------------------------------- 75
3. CSD Accomplishment Map ------------------------------------------------- 77

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Community-Based Forest Management Program (CBFMP)

revolutionized forest development and rehabilitation efforts of the government
when it was institutionalized in 1995 by virtue of Executive Order No. 263.
Before the adoption of the CBFM approach, the sole motivating factor of
contract reforestation awardees was primarily financial gains. With the
implementation of the Forestry Sector Project (FSP) using CBFM as its main
strategy to rehabilitate the upland ecosystem, it empowered beneficiary
communities economically, socially, technically and politically while transforming
them into environmentally responsible managers. The tenurial right to develop
subproject sites alongside the various inputs from the Subproject deepened
their commitment to collaborate with other stakeholders in the implementation
of these subprojects.
The Sisay-Datu Tumanggong Watershed Subproject covers Barangays

Sisay and Datu Tumanggong of Tungawan Municipality, Province of Zamboanga
del Sur. It serves the irrigation requirements of the southern barangays of
Tungawan Municipality as well as supports the Sto. Nino and Gulinan Dams for
agricultural and domestic needs of downstream communities.
Implementation of the Subproject was weighed down by troubles right

from the start, ranging from natural ones like prolonged rains and the El Nino;
to operational problems of contractors; technical problems of the people’s
organization as well as forest fires.
All of these however were surmounted especially with the installation of

the Subproject Site Management Office and its personnel who provided
assistance in all aspects of project implementation.
The goal to rehabilitate the Subproject’s brushland and grassland areas

and develop certain portions of its residual forest was successfully accomplished
with its target area of 2,000 hectares exceeded by 10.88 hectares or a total of
2,010.88 hectares with an average survival rate of 84.68%.
Involvement in Comprehensive Site Development activities, road

rehabilitation as well as other project activities provided income to the people
generating a total of 212, 325 man days or a total of 170 full-time jobs each
year.
Employment in the Subproject and involvement in business ventures

through livelihood activities of the PO raised the earnings of the people and
their socio-economic status.
i
Before the start of the project, the communities had an average annual
gross income of PHP 22,335.00 including off-farm, on-farm, and non-farm
activities which was raised to PHP 33,000.00 or approximately 48% increase
during implementation of the project.
The rehabilitation of the 3.8 kilometers farm-to-market road on the

other hand will help ensure the sustainability of the established livelihood
projects of the communities as it provides mobility for its residents.
The trainings availed of by the members among others, were on

management skills and specific ones on plantation management and business
skills, and have boosted their morale and confidence considerably.
A bonus benefit of the Subproject is the goodwill and the harmony it has
fostered among the Muslims and the Christians in the area.
ii
SUBPROJECT PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT
OF
SISAY-DATU TUMANGGONG WATERSHED REHABILITATION

SUBPROJECT
Loan Agreement No. PH-P 135

FORESTRY SECTOR PROJECT
I. Subproject Description
The Subproject is a major and significant watershed system that serves the
irrigation requirements of the southern barangays of Tungawan Municipality.
Tungawan River and its three tributaries: Diosong, Langisan, and Tigbalangao
Creeks have their headwaters within the Subproject site in the mountain
ranges where the residual forest is located. The watershed supports the
Sto. Nino and Gulinan Dams that supply water for the irrigation and domestic
use of the downstream communities.
The Sisay-Datu Tumanggong Watershed Subproject covers Barangays Sisay

and Datu Tumanggong of Tungawan Municipality, Province of Zamboanga del
Sur. It is located between longitude 12219” to longitude 12220” and
latitude 735” to latitude 738”.
1. Purpose / Objectives
A) Original (at the time of appraisal)
1. To rehabilitate and develop the grassland and brushland areas by

establishing 645 hectares reforestation plantation; 658 rubber
plantation; 62 hectares bamboo plantation for stream bank stabilization;
and developing 157 hectares agro forestry farms.
1
2. To develop 478 hectares of suitable site in the residual forest into
rattan plantation while protecting the rest of residual forest for
watershed, biodiversity and other environmental values;
3. To capacitate and empower the communities for proper management

of the forest and community resources through community organizing,
training and information and education program; and
4. To provide a mechanism for the stewardship and sustainable

development of the entire Subproject area either through appropriate
Community-Based Forest Management/Stewardship Agreement or any
legal and acceptable arrangement.
B) Modification
a. Modified purpose/objectives N/A

b. Reasons for modification (with detailed explanation of the
discrepancy between the original and modified basic plans,
where applicable)
2. Subproject Scope and Dimension
A. Comparison of Original and Actual Scope & Dimensions
a.1 Please check; There has been ( revision and/or modification or

 no revision and/or modification) of the subproject scope and
dimensions.
a.2 if “revision and/or modification”, please complete the
Original Scope and Revised/Modified

ITEM Dimensions (at the time of (Actual)
appraisal/Planned)
1.REFORESTATION/
WATERSHED/CBFM
A. SMP Schedule: September 15, Schedule: September 15,

1995 to December 6, 1995 1995 to August 1996
Target Area: 2,000 ha Area: 2,000 ha
B. CO1 Schedule: July 31, 1997 to Schedule: July 31, 1997 to

January 28, 2001 November 17, 2003
2
Target Area: 2,000 ha Area: 2,000 ha
Target Activities: Activities Conducted:

1. Social Investigation 1. Social Investigation
2. Information, Education 2. Information, Education

and Communication and Communication
Campaign Campaign
3. Documentation Process 3. Documentation Process
4. Identification of 4. Identification of
Possible CBFMA Possible CBFMA
5. Organizing Activities 5. Organizing Activities
6. Community Activities 6. Community Activities
7. Project Management 7. Project Management

Cost/ Reporting Cost/ Reporting
C. CSD
1. SOIL EROSION 62 ha 62 ha
CONTROL/ SWC
a. Infrastructure
b. Trail and Footpath
c. Plantation
c.1. Stream bank
Stabilization 157 ha 157 ha
(Bamboo)
2. VEGETATIVE
MEASURES2
a. Agro forestry
b. Assisted Natural
Regeneration 478 ha 478 ha
c. Enrichment
Planting 645 ha 655.88 ha
d. Tree Plantation
d.1 Bamboo 658 ha 658 ha
d.2 Rattan
d.3 Mangrove
d.4 Plantation
Species
3
d.5 Rubber
3. INVENTORY OF
RESIDUAL FOREST
4. INCOME
ENHANCEMENT
PROJECT
5. INFRASTRUCTURE
- Bunkhouse 10 units 9 units
- Look-out Tower 8 units 10 units
- Graded Trail/ 49 kms 39 kms
Footpath
D. INFRASTRUCTURE
COMPONENT
- Rehabilitation of Farm-
to-Market Road N/A 3.818 kms
E. MONITORING AND Inspection Chart Mapping

EVALUATION
Year 1 2,000 has (Physical and
Institutional)
October 20, 1999 to April
6, 2001
Year 2 2,000 has (Physical)

May 16, 2002 to February
15, 2003
2,000 has (Institutional)

December 23, 2002 to
October 20, 2003
Activities for Physical

M&E:
1. Verification of
Boundaries, UTM
monuments and block
corner post
2. Seedling
Production/Inventory
Analysis
3. Survival Inventory
4
(height and diameter
measurements and related
observations per
area/components and
parcels
4. Documentation/Reports
Activities for Institutional

and Project Benefits M&E:
1. Preparatory activities
2. Primary data collection
and preliminary
assessment
3. Documentation/Reports
2.SUSIMO
Equipment provided to the N/A 1 unit KIA Ceres

Office3 1 unit KIA Crosstrak
3 units Motorcycle
1 unit Power Generator
1 set Computer
1 unit Printer
1 unit UPS
1 unit GIS Maptitude
2 units GPS
2 units Handheld Radio
1 unit Base Radio
2 units Forester's Transit
1 unit Manual Typewriter
4 units Brunton Compass
2 units Steel Nylon Tape
2 units Diameter Tape
1 unit Planimeter
4 units Abney Hand Level
1 unit Rain Guage
3 units Binocular
1 unit Lettering Set
2 units Grass Cutter
Research Conducted N/A
Trainings Attended4 1. Orientation Course for

Watershed Subproject
5
SUSIMO
2. Orientation Workshop
on the Implementation of
Capital Build-Up System
for Community-Based
Forest Management
Project
3. Re-Echo Seminar/
Workshop on FSP
Guidelines for PO's
Orientation and Action
Planning
4. Mid-Year Assessment/
Workshop Seminar
5. FSP Year-End
Assessment
6. Consultative Meeting/
Workshop
7. GPS Orientation
Workshop
Others
1. SUSIMO Office 96 sq. m. floor area
2. Site Engineer’s Office 46 sq. m. floor area
3. SUSIMO Staff 11 staff

- 8 Permanent
Employees from
CENRO Ipil
- 3 Contractual
Employees
1
Please refer to Table 1 for the details on trainings attended by the POs
2
Table 2 details the subproject performance in terms of area planted
3
Table 3 shows the details of the equipment provided to the SUSIMO
4
Please refer to Table 4 for the trainings attended by the SUSIMO staff
B. Reasons for Revision/Modification of Scope and Dimensions
b.1 Where there has been “revision/modification” of the Subproject

scope and dimensions.
Please choose the reason (s) from the following lists and check.
6
 Revision of the superior plan (e.g. sector development plan,
etc.)
 Revision of the supply-and-demand estimate
 Large fluctuation in the Subproject cost
 Substantial revision of design due to unpredictable physical
condition at the time of the original design (e.g. poor soil
condition, etc.)
 Natural disaster/bad weather
 Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing
Agency
 Structural and organizational problems of the agencies
concerned (e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with
other agencies, etc.)
 Availability of funds, use of contingency, fluctuation of the
exchange rate, etc.)
 Unrealistic initial plan/Technical problems
 Procurement problems
 Performance of contractor/supplier
 Performance of consultant
 Change in construction period
 Others
b.2. Detailed statement of reasons (with background)
Performance of Contractor
Community Organizing
The schedule for the conduct of Community Organizing Activities was
extended because of re-awarding to another contractor when the
services of the original contractor was terminated.
Others (Adjustment in the established CSD Infrastructures)

Actual construction of the CSD infrastructures was changed according
to the requirements of the maintenance and protection activities of the
People’s Organization.
Bunkhouse
Originally, 10 bunkhouses were to be established in all plantation
components. In actual implementation, only nine bunkhouses were
constructed since it was deemed unnecessary to construct an additional
bunkhouse for the bamboo plantation.
Look-out Tower
Additional 2 look-out towers were constructed for the plantation
species/ reforestation components area.
7
Graded Trail/ Footpath
A total of 10 kilometers Graded trail/ footpath was unnecessary to
construct: four kilometers for Reforestation; three and a half kilometers
for Agro forestry; and two and a half kilometers for Rattan.
Others (Creation of New Guidelines)
Monitoring and Evaluation

A new guideline was released governing the conduct of Monitoring and
Evaluation of all FSP sites. The Inspection Chart Mapping process for
M&E identified during the appraisal was replaced using a new process
supported by Memorandum Circular 99-17 “Guidelines on the Conduct of
Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) of Forestry Sector Project Loan II”.
Subproject Site Management Office

In the year 2000, the Subproject Site Management Office was created
to facilitate subproject activities. In the early stage of subproject
implementation a site coordinator was deployed to monitor the progress
of project implementation and the Community Environment and Natural
Resources Office (CENRO) was the one validating the accomplishments
of the PO. It was realized that the field staff and CENRO staff to
monitor subproject activities and accomplishments is inadequate in
addressing numerous activities of the subproject hence, the SUSIMO
was created.
Others (Additional Component)
Infrastructure Component
This is an additional component of the Forestry Sector Project after it
was realized that vital infrastructure facilities should support the
established livelihood projects of the PO.
C. Contribution of Subproject to Relevant (Sub) Sector (s)
c.1 (Sub) Sectors to which the subproject belongs
 Electric power and Gas  Telecommunication  Social services

 (Multipurpose) Dams  Telecommunications Water supply
 Power Plants  Broadcasting  Sewerage
 Transmission lines  Education
 Distribution Systems  Irrigation and Flood control  Health
 Gas  Irrigation  Tourism
 Others  Flood control  Others
8
 Transportation  Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
 Roads  Agriculture and Forestry
 Bridges  Fisheries
 Railways
 Airport  Mining and Manufacturing
 Ports  Mining
 Marine Transportation  Manufacturing
 Others
c.2 Original (At the time of Appraisal/Planned)
Item Description
1. Development of the  The planting design would leave the
vegetative cover of the area area fully covered with trees. Planting
of bamboo beside the riverbanks will
subsequently reduce siltation and
sedimentation of the rivers/creeks
found in the area. Further, once the
forest cover is restored and the
canopy becomes dense, silt and splash
erosion caused by direct rainfall would
be minimized. Planting mixed species
would enhance ecological diversity in
the area. Soil erosion would be
significantly reduced once forest
cover is fully developed. It would
minimize sedimentation and siltation
of the Tungawan River. Land use in the
area would be greatly improved and
soil productivity would be restored
resulting to a more improved
production. Less productive areas
would be converted to more
productive uses through reforestation
using leguminous species.
2. Increase in water supply that  Development of the area would

would support adjacent dams. increase available soil moisture and
ground water yield as well as regulate
stream flow. This would provide
continuous water supply that would
support the Sto Niño and Guilinan
Dams.
9
3. Would provide employment and  Intercropping of cash crops during
livelihood opportunities. the early stages of the plantation will
provide immediate source of food and
income to the farmers.
 The Subproject would bring

employment opportunities for the
member barangays though plantation
establishment activities.
c.3 Present situation and outlook for the future
Item Description
1. CBFMA  This is a tenurial agreement between
MACWMPAI and DENR covering a
period of 25 years renewable for
another 25 years. A total of 2,510
hectares were awarded on March 20,
2000. The agreement granted the PO
the right to develop, protect and
sustainably manage the CSD area and
the remaining forest.
 The issuance of the CBFMA, the
presence of the DENR, and the
vigilance of the PO minimized illegal
logging activities within the
Subproject area.
 Six PO members have been deputized
and were given authority by the
DENR to apprehend illegal loggers
within the area. This is one measure
to ensure continuous vigilance in
curbing illegal logging within the area
.
2. Established Plantations  The Subproject area is fully covered

with permanent trees (Gmelina,
Mahogany, and Manguim for refo
species; Parra Rubber; Palasan for
Rattan; Buho and Bayog for Bamboo;
Mango and Coffee for Agroforestry.
Planting of mixed species enhanced
ecological diversity in the area.
 Planting of bamboo beside riverbank
10
reduced siltation and sedimentation
of the river/ creeks fond in the area.
 Land use in the area is greatly
improved and soil productivity is
restored resulting to higher improved
production.
 With the rehabilitation of the
watershed, the residents experience
cooler atmosphere.
 Development of the forest cover
significantly reduced soil erosion.
Sedimentation and siltation of the
Tungawan River are minimized.
 With the commitment of the PO to
continuously maintain and protect the
developed area, the environmental
impacts of the project mentioned
above will be continuously felt and
may even improve in the future.
3. Increase in Water Yield  The residents observed increase in
Support to the Guilinan and Sto the supply of water that resulted to
Niño Dams 3 croppings per year from 1-2
croppings per year before Subproject
implementation.
 The continuous maintenance and
protection activities of the PO would
further ensure stable supply of water
in the future.
4. Employment Generation  The Subproject provided employment

Increase in Income and livelihood opportunities to the
Livelihood Project5 participating community members.
Opportunities  170 full-time jobs were created per
year in the five-year implementation
period of the Subproject.
 The PO established a rice trading
project that gained a net profit of
PHP 135,000.00, to date. They also
started Sawali trading project that is
expected to bring high profit as
projected in the feasibility study.
 There was an increase of 48% in the
average household income of the
participating residents from PHP
22,335.00 before the start of the
11
Subproject to PHP 33,000.00.
 The projected harvest from the
planted agro forest trees such as
coffee and mango will add to the
revenues of the PO.
 The continuous implementation of the
livelihood projects will open other
opportunities in the future and will
further enhance the capabilities of
the PO members’ entrepreneurial
skills.
5. Rehabilitation of Farm-to-  The primary objective of the farm-

Market Road to-market road rehabilitation is to
support the livelihood activities of
the community. Expenses needed to
transport farm products to other
parts of the region were minimized.
 With the rehabilitation of the farm-
to- market road the area is more
accessible to people and vehicles.
 The DENR forged an agreement with
the local government in the
maintenance of the rehabilitated
road. It is expected that the road
will be a gateway to new opportunities
in the future.
6. Minimized occurrence of  The Subproject site area was once a

insurgency and fostered positive hot spot of Muslim rebellion. With
relationship between the Muslims the development of the area, the
and Christians occurrence of encounters between
the Armed Forces and the Muslim
separatist group have been lessened.
 The rehabilitation of the farm-to-
market road was also one of the
reasons that insurgency in the area
was lessened.
 The Subproject became the uniting
force in the community paving for
the gap between Muslims and
Christians to be resolved.
 The continuous strengthening
activities of the People’s Organization
will ensure unification among its
12
members towards a peaceful
community.
7. PO’s Social responsibility  The People’s Organization is very

much active in the improvement of
education in local schools. The PO had
helped in the repairs of the school
building.
 The PO donated one generator to
Barangay Timbabawan for provision of
electricity to the community.
 The PO is known to be helpful even to
non-members especially during
emergency.
 Even after project funding, the PO
committed to offer help for the
betterment of the communities.
8. Environmental awareness  The conduct of information,

education, and communication
campaigns made the residents aware
of their responsibility to preserve,
protect, and utilize forest resources
properly
 They have realized the importance of
the watershed in their community and
the service that it brings to the
lowlands.
 Because of the developed awareness,
the PO committed to continuously
maintain and protect the watershed.
This would certainly sustain
Subproject’s accomplishments in the
area.
5
Please refer to Table 5 for the livelihood project being implemented by the POs
II. Subproject Implementation
1. Organizations for Implementing Subproject
13
Functions in the Name of Organization
Reasons for
Subproject
(1) Original (2) Changed Change
Implementation
1. SMP Contractor Philippine N/A
Economic,
Ecological and
Social Service
Foundation, Inc.
2. AO for CO Basilan Env’t Renewed Tribal Conflict with PO

Resources Dev’t Association,
Foundation Inc Inc. (RTAI)
(BERDFI)
3. Assisting Edna P. Abraham Ramon Blanco Conflict with

Professional SUSIMO
personnel
4. PO Makasanyang N/A
Community
Watershed Multi-
Purpose
Association Inc,
(MACWMPAI)
5. M&E Gamut Ug N/A

Year 1 and 2 Salingsing Sa
(Physical and Bohol, Inc.
Institutional) (GASALBO)
Year 3 Citizen Association N/A

Physical for Forest
Succession, Inc.
(CAFSI)
Kasanyangan N/A
Institutional Foundation, Inc.
(KFI)
6. Infra Contractor Lakewood Const. N/A

Co.
Please state:
14
1.1 Reasons for the change
Assisting Organization for Community Organizing

The original contractor for the conduct of the community
organizing activities, BERDFI, failed to mobilize the PO. Instead of
uniting the PO, the actions of BERDFI created confusion and
mistrust among the members. Further, BERDFI organized another
PO that led to the inevitable termination of their contract as
requested by the PO. To continue the community organizing
activities in the Subproject, the contract was re-awarded to RTAI.
Assisting Professional
The first Assisting Professional, Ms. Edna P Abraham was not able
to build a good relationship with the PO and most especially with
the SUSIMO. She was not able to perform well as an AP. The
SUSIMO requested for her replacement.
1.2 Problems arising, counter measures adopted and results
Community Organizing Activities of RTAI was interrupted.
RTAI was on the process of completing all the activities stipulated
in the contract when Mr. Ismael Basug, the organization president,
was shot dead while following up their billing at the CENR Office
causing a long delay in the implementation of the community
organizing. The remaining officers and members of RTAI took a
long time to decide whether to continue or discontinue their
contract. It was only when the wife of Mr. Basug, Vilma, took over
the organization that they decided to continue the remaining
activities. By this time however, their contract has already expired.
RTAI requested for an extension of their contract and was granted

by the DENR Regional Office at Zamboanga City for a period of
eight (8) months or until April 30, 2001.
The AO organized a new PO.

The AO’s mistake of organizing another PO other than the
MACWMPAI caused conflict between members and in the
implementation of the CSD. The new PO also has its own set of
officers.
This problem was solved through a series of dialogues and meetings

between the set of officers of the two (2) parties. The DENR
Regional Office initiated the series of dialogues with the
15
assistance of the site coordinator, CENRO, PENRO, and the Local
Government of Tungawan, Zamboanga Sibugay Province.
Comprehensive Site Development

El Niño Phenomenon in 1998
Because of the occurrence of long drought brought by the El Niño
Phenomenon, plantation establishment was not implemented in the
year 1998. Instead, the PO concentrated on other activities
specifically, seedling production.
Resistance of Farmers to join the Subproject

Farmers/ stakeholders initially refused to join the Project because
of their perception that it was merely a ploy of the government
specifically the DENR to take over their land.
Continuous information, education, and communication (IEC)

campaign was conducted by the DENR and the AO. The farmers/
stakeholders who were initially against the implementation of the
Project, began to understand its concept and the real intention of
the DENR.
The confidence of the PO members were further bolstered when

the Community-Based Forest Management Agreement was awarded
to their organization on March 20, 2000. Individual Certificate of
Stewardship will be awarded soon.
Multiple Claimants of the Subproject area

When the members were enjoying the initial success of the
Subproject and the growth of the planted trees already visible,
conflict started with the emergence of multiple claimants. The PO
together with the SUSIMO created the Committee on Conflict
Resolution composed of elderly Muslims who have the capacity to
identify true owners of the subject areas. Legitimate owners were
later proclaimed.
Unintentional Burning
Areas adjacent to the Subproject sites are cogonal. Because of
this, it was unavoidable for farmers not to burn the cogon to
prepare their land for planting agricultural crops. The burning
reached the Subproject site.
A total of 264 hectares were burned in 2002. Part of this was the
Rubber, Reforestation, and Agroforestry areas. The burned areas
were replanted. In 2003 the same areas were burned with a larger
16
damage of 364 hectares. Subsequently, replanting activities were
done.
This happened despite the keen maintenance and protection, patrol

activities of the PO. Unfortunately, these burnings happened
between 10:00 PM to 12:00 midnight when they were prohibited to
roam around for security reasons.
There were measures that were adopted by the PO to avoid future

occurrences and spread of fire. First, intensive training on fire
prevention, suppression, and control were conducted with the help
of the SUSIMO. Second, the PO bought fire-fighting equipment
such as power sprayer, rollers (pagulong/ logs), as well as carabaos
that will carry the rollers.
Unavailability of Mangium Seedlings for the Replanting of Burned

Plantations
During the replanting of the burned areas, there was a scarce
supply of Mangium Seedlings. As replacement, Gmelina and
Mahogany Seedlings were planted.
Problem on the Procurement of Seedlings for Agroforestry

Component
The People’s Organization experienced difficulty in the
procurement of calamansi seedlings so that it was replaced with
coffee.
They also encountered problems with regard to the procurement of

Mango seedlings. They found it very hard to purchase grafted
seedlings since the original amount specified in their contract was
way below the prevailing market price. Hence, some of the seedlings
that were planted in the early stages of the contract were not
grafted. It was only in the latter part of the Subproject
implementation that they utilized grafted seedlings due to the
increase in cost per seedling in the revised contract.
Unpleasant Road Condition

During the start of the of the Subproject activities especially on
Comprehensive Site Development, the People’s Organization found
it very hard to start their operation. The transport of the
necessary materials to the Subproject site could not be easily done
since the road leading to the area was badly in need of repair and
there was no four-wheel vehicle available.
17
However with the rehabilitation of the farm-to-market road and
the availability of a four-wheel vehicle, it became easier to
implement CSD activities in the area especially the maintenance
and protection of the plantations.
Rat Infestation within the Rubber Plantation

Rats inhabited the cogonal areas adjacent to the rubber plantation
area. The rats like the aroma of the planted rubber trees. They ate
the stem as well as the roots of planted seedlings. Remedial action
of the PO and the SUSIMO was to plant high stump bare root
rubber seedlings in the infested area. But there were areas within
the rubber plantation that were clean and free from rat
infestation, in such cases, rubber seedlings were planted in these
areas.
Insurgency
The occurrence of insurgency affected the smooth implementation
of the CSD activities. Presence of encounters prohibited the PO
members to go to the plantation area. One incident happened
during the height of Moro uprising in the area when the Armed
Forces blockaded the supply of food in Barangay Sisay and the
residents were not allowed to bring food and goods bought from
the town. The PO and the SUSIMO with the help of the CENRO
sought a certification from the military unit in the area, allowing
the transportation food and goods in the Subproject communities
and in the plantation areas. The certification was granted. Since
then other barangays followed suit with the PO intervening for the
people.
1.3 The latest organization chart (or equivalent) for the

implementation of the Subproject is ( attached or  not
available). Organizational charts of the different contractors from
SMP, CO, CSD, M&E, to Infra are attached as Annexes 1a, 1b, 1c,
1d, 1f respectively.
1.4 If the organizational chart (or equivalent) is not available, please

state the reason
2. Implementation Period
A. Comparison of Original Schedule and Actual Period
Please fill in the following blanks with actual period for each item.
18
ITEM ORIGINAL SCHEDULE ACTUAL PERIOD
1. Contract for SMP September 15, 1995 – September 15, 1995 –
December 6, 1995 August 1996
2. Contract of AO for August 1, 1997 -January August 1, 1997 –

CO 28, 2001 November 17, 2003
3. Contract of PO for December 5, 1997 – December 5, 1997 – June

CSD December 5, 2000 30, 2003
4. Contract of NGO for

M&E
Year 1 October 20, 1999 – October20, 1999 – April
October 31, 2000 6, 2001
Year 2
Physical May 16, 2002 – February May 16, 2002 – February
15, 2003 15, 2003
Institutional December 23, 2002 – December 23, 2002 –

April 23, 2003 October 20, 2003
5. Contract of September 20,2002 - September 20,2002 -

Infrastructure June 30, 2003 August 30, 2003
@ Completion December 2000 December 2003

(completion of
subproject)
Please refer to Table 6 for the subproject status report
Notes: Completion of the subproject was defined as (  completion ceremony

or  final disbursement or  other than the above.
The completion was scheduled for December 2000 (at the time of
appraisal) and is indicated ( thus @) in the above Table.
B. Reasons for Delay or Early Completion
b.1 In case of delay or early completion, please choose the reason

(s) from the following list and check.
 Change in scope/dimensions
 Natural disaster/Unseasonable weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon,
etc.)
19
 Shortage of funds/fluctuations of the exchange rate
 Problems in procurement
 Inflation
 Unusual circumstance beyond the control of the Executing Agency
 Structural and organizational problems of the agencies concerned
(e.g. lack of staff, inadequate coordination with other agencies,
etc.)
 Legislative Matters
 Unrealistic initial plan/technical problems
 Performance of contractor/supplier
 Performance of consultant
 Others
b.2 Reasons and background for delay or early completion
Natural Disaster/ Unreasonable Weather

SMP
The contract for the conduct of SMP was extended due to
prolonged rains which affected the smooth implementation of the
activities.
CSD
Plantation establishment started only in CY 1999 because of the
occurrence of the El Niño Phenomenon in CY 1998 that affected
the quality of the plantation. A 3-year extension of the CSD
implementation was granted.

Occurrence of heavy rains affected the conduct of M&E of
GASALBO.
The infra contractor was not able to deliver construction
materials in the site and the construction was disrupted because
of the heavy rains. Rainy season would not have posed a problem if
only they deployed enough number of laborers during the dry
months of January to April to avoid delay in the construction.
Performance of Contractor
The poor performance of the 1st CO contractor, BERDFI, delayed
the conduct of the CO activities. They organized another PO
other than the MACMPAI, the true contractor of the CSD which
resulted to confusion and conflict. Because of this, their contract
was terminated and was re-awarded to RTAI.
20
However, the contract of RTAI was also terminated because of
dismal performance. After the death of their president, Mr.
Basug, it took them time to decide whether to continue their
service or not. The commitment of Mrs. Vilma Basug to take-over
finally made them decide to push through with their contract.
Added to the delay was the late submission of their reports.
CSD
The initial operation of the CSD was delayed because of the
existence of another PO formed by BERDFI. It took eight months
for the issue to be settled.

The late submission of reports of GASALBO contributed much to
the delay of the conduct of the M&E for Year 1 and 2.
The M&E contractor for the Institutional and Project Benefits

Assessment, KFI, did not submit their final report on the target
date. Because of this, they sought extension of their contract.
The cause of delay in the construction of the farm-to-market
road was few laborers deployed by the contractor.
Others (Security Reasons)

Another reason for the delay of the construction was the unstable
peace and order situation in the area.
C. Remedial Action Taken in Each Case of Delay
SMP
An extension was granted by the DENR in consideration of the
bad weather condition experienced by the contractor.
CO
The DENR granted extension of the contract of RTAI. But still,
RTAI was not able to deliver the requirements for the completion
of their contract. Their contract was terminated, and the
remaining payments were not released.
CSD
The PO with the help of the assigned site coordinator, worked
over-time to make up for time lost in resolving the conflict
created by BERDFI in forming another PO.
21
With the occurrence of El Niño, the PO devoted the remaining
months of CY 1998 in seedling production activities.
Further, the contract of the PO for CSD was extended

considering the occurrence of El Niño that affected much the
quality of the plantation. The extension also focused on the
intensive maintenance and protection of the plantations.
M&E
Extensions were provided on the contracts of GASALBO and KFI.
Unfortunately GASALBO, unlike the KFI, was not able to submit
their final report thus preventing them from receiving the final
payment as stipulated in the contract.
The DENR advised the contractor to hire additional labor to meet
the deadline for the completion of the construction. Lakewood
failed to find additional labor force for the construction so that
their contract was extended. Further, the DENR advised
Lakewood Construction Company to exercise better time
management for them to be able to accomplish the activities
stipulated in their contract.
3. Subproject Cost
A. Comparison of Original Estimated Cost and Actual Expenditure (by

Component)
Original Cost
Actual Expenditures
ITEM (based on appraisal)
Survey Mapping and 1.350000 1.350000

Planning
Community Organization 3.600000 3.588000
Comprehensive Site 25.485000 37.535517

Development
Monitoring and Evaluation 2.912555 2.780464
Infrastructure 13.951371 13.934721

Development
22
Subproject Coordinating 2.455815 2.455815
Office
Total 49.754741 61.644517

Please refer to Tables 7, 8, 9a-e, 10 for details on the costs of SMP, CO, CSD, and M&E.
List of Infra project/s with corresponding cost is attached as Table 11
B. Reasons for Difference between Original Estimated Cost and Actual

Expenditure
b.1 If there is any difference between Table a.1 and Table a.2 in
Paragraph a, please choose the reason(s) from the following list
and check.
 Increase in reconstruction cost arising from natural

disaster/unreasonable weather (e.g. earthquake, typhoon, etc.)
 increase or decrease arising from a change in construction period
 increase or decrease arising from inflation
 increase or decrease arising from fluctuation in the exchange rate
 increase or decrease arising from a change in the scope/work
volume of the subproject
 Decrease arising from keen competition in tender
 Unusual circumstances beyond the control of the Executing
Agency
 Unrealistic cost estimates/Technical problems
 Others (Termination of Contracts)
b.2 Description of the detailed reason(s) and background
Unrealistic cost estimates/ Increase and Decrease arising from

inflation
CSD
The imposition of Memorandum Circular-2000-19, revised the original
contract amount of CSD. The final revision of the CSD contract
increased the amount from PHP 25,485,507.00 to PHP 37,535,568.87.
MC 2000-19 is the guidelines governing the updating of cost estimate
and intensification of plantation maintenance and protection activities
for the DENR-FSP Watershed Subproject under JBIC funding. The
basis for the said MC was the change in the economic situation of the
country due to inflation and the occurrence of El Niño Phenomenon
that led to an urgent need to adjust the cost of establishing,
maintaining, and protecting the plantations of the Subproject. The MC
also covered the upgrading of costs of grafted seedling.
23
The cost of the Infrastructure component of the Subproject was
reduced because there were activities identified during the original
plan, which in the construction process were found not necessary to
undertake.
Others (Termination of Contracts)

CO
The difference between original cost and the actual disbursed amount
was attributed to the termination of the contracts of the CO
contractors.
M&E
Major reason in the difference between the original amount
stipulated in the M&E contract and the actual disbursed amount was
the termination of the contract of GASALBO. The DENR did not
grant the final payment of the contract since GASALBO failed to
submit its final report.
C. Action taken in Case of Cost Overrun and Results
Additional obligation was made for the intensification of maintenance

and protection activities of the plantation. Corresponding revision of
the work and financial plan and amendments of the CSD contracts
were also undertaken. All financial obligations had been paid with
corresponding physical accomplishments.
D. Comparison of Original Estimated Expenditure and Actual Expenditure

(by year)
Calendar Original Cost Actual Expenditures

Year (based on appraisal)
1995 1.350000 0.850000
1996 - 0.500000
1997 0.060965 0.060965
1998 14.491535 5.999369
1999 10.496991 9.967501
24
2000 5.803064 7.065826
2001 0.495000 5.784317
2002 0.723475 8.773660
2003 16.333711 22.642879
TOTAL 49.754741 61.644517

Please refer to Table 12 for the details of the Annual Work and Financial Plan
4. Comments on Performance of Assisting Organizations (AOs), Assisting

Professionals (APs), Peoples Organization (Pos), M&E and
Infrastructure contractors.
Please describe the performance of each organization after checking the

item(s) in the relevant list on which you have any comment.
A. Performance of Assisting Organizations & Assisting Professionals (if

any) Peoples Organizations (POs), M&E and infrastructure contractors
a.1.  Overall Performance  Design

 Contract Administration  Construction supervision
 Expertise  Staff qualifications
 Coordinating ability  Compliance with Contracts
 Performance related to any other than the Subproject scope,
if any.
 Others
a.2. Description (in detail)
Overall Performance/ Expertise/ Coordinating Ablitiy/ Staff

Qualifications
Assisting Organization
The original Assisting Organization’s (BERDFI) performance
in the site could be considered as satisfactory in terms of
expertise in organizing, staff qualifications and coordinating
ability.
However, confusion arose when BERDFI organized another PO

hampering the smooth implementation of the Subproject.
On the other hand, the next Assisting Organization (RTAI)

also possessed the required capability in coordinating with
25
other entities, however it was found to be wanting in other
aspects of their performance especially on staff qualification,
financial capability and over-all performance.
On the preparation of their reports, the staff assigned to

gather pertinent data lacked the knowledge on what should be
done hence, the delay in report preparation and submission.
Assisting Professionals
Not much could be said on the performance of the original
Assisting Professional, Ms. Edna P. Abraham. All members of
the SUSIMO petitioned for her relief after a short stint in
the area.
Ms. Abraham also had a problem building rapport with the

members of the SUSIMO as well as with the PO that greatly
affected her working relationship with them.
The other Assisting Professional, Mr. Ramon Blanco possessed

the expertise required in the area such as policy formulation
and financial management. However, he lacked the patience
to deal with the members of the PO.
People’s Organization
The Makasanyang Community Watershed Multi-Purpose
Association Inc, (MACWMPAI) was able to accomplish the set
target for plantation establishment. More, they expanded
their accomplishment in the reforestation component with
10.88 hectares without additional cost from the DENR. They
were able to catch up with the re-establishment of burned
plantations. Although they lack technical knowledge about the
CSD, the PO had the enthusiasm to learn and accomplish all
the activities for the CSD.
Along with the successful physical accomplishment of the PO

was the effort to strengthen the organization. The PO has
438 active members. Active members were those who
participated in all organizational and plantation development,
maintenance and protection activities.
The PO possessed some degree of expertise in the area of

coordinating with other entities considering that some of
their officers are also the members of the local government
unit in their respective barangays.
26
On livelihood project establishment, the PO has an on-going
rice trading project that caters mostly to the active
members of the organization. They also started a Sawali
trading project.
These observations attest the very satisfactory performance

of PO.
Monitoring and Evaluation Contractors

The M& E contractors for the physical accomplishments of
the People’s Organization, GASALBO and CAFSI possessed
the required technical expertise, coordinating ability and
staff qualifications. However, GASALBO failed to submit
their final report on the target extension date, thus the
rating fair.
CAFSI satisfactorily accomplished the latest M & E of the

physical accomplishments of the PO. But they should have
purchased their own equipment for them to be able to
accomplish their target in a shorter period of time.
Kasanyangan Foundation, Inc., the contractor that conducted

M and E on the institutional aspects of the PO likewise
possessed the necessary staff qualification. They did fairly
well in undertaking the activities.
Infrastructure Contractor
Lakewood Construction, the company contracted to conduct
the rehabilitation of the farm-to-market-road possessed the
required technical skills and the heavy equipment needed for
the completion of their contract. Over-all performance is
rated satisfactory.
5. Other matters related to Subproject Implementation
Please choose the item(s) from the following list on which you have any
comment, check it (them), and describe it (them) with measures and
results in (B) below.
A.  Technical  Financial  Institutional  Economic

 Social/Distributional  Others
B. Description (in detail)
27
Institutional (Support and Monitoring on the Subproject
Activity)
In the early stage of project implementation, the DENR deployed
a site coordinator to oversee Subproject activities but because of
other numerous assignments, the person in-charge was not able to
supervise all the activities. Another problem during the early
stage of Subproject implementation was the late validation of
established plantations and late payment of CSD billings due to
lack of manpower in the CENRO office. Delay in the validation of
the established plantations resulted in the delay in payment of
CSD billing since validation reports is a requirement for payment.
The DENR addressed these problems with the establishment of
the Subproject Site Management Office (SUSIMO) in all
subprojects by virtue of DAO 2000-65. The SUSIMO provided
direct assistance to the PO in all aspects of project
implementation especially on the CSD activities. To facilitate the
Subproject activities, the SUSIMO has four (4) units namely; Site
Development and Management unit (SDMU), Validation and Billing
Unit (VBU), Community Organizing and Strengthening Unit (COSU)
and the Administrative Support Unit (ASU). The Subproject
Management Officer (SMO) heads the SUSIMO. The SMO
oversees the activities of the heads and staff of the units.
Social/ Distributional (Unintentional Burning of Plantation)

Farmers in the uplands adjacent to the plantations practice
burning as a preparatory stage in planting agricultural crops.
Burning of the cogonal areas spread to other areas in the
plantations. To prevent its occurrence, the PO bought fire-
fighting equipment and went on an intensive training in fire
suppression and control. The PO also found it necessary to
conduct information, education, and communication campaign to
the adjacent communities on the negative effects of burning.
Financial ( Financial Management of PO)

In the initial stage of project implementation, the PO lacked
knowledge on financial management, thus found it hard to liquidate
the funds that they have utilized in the conduct of activities.
Moreover, financial records were not properly stored hence some
of those were destroyed due to exposure to adverse elements.
Presently, the PO has a better system in their finances. They
were able to hire an accountant to review and fix their books on
finances.
28
III. Action Taken by the AOs, APs and POs relating to Recommendation(s)
1. Recommendation(s) made by SUSIMO
This article is ( applicable. The recommendations are given below or 

not applicable. There has been no recommendation with regard to the
subproject).
2. Action Taken and Results
Recommendation(s) made by the Action Taken And Results

SUSIMO
1. Continuous care, maintenance and The PO took the advise and

protection activities of the conducted rigorous maintenance and
plantations. protection activities in all
plantations. This resulted to higher
survival rate of 84.68 %.
2. Hiring of additional technical The PO hired additional number of

personnel and purchase technical personnel and purchased
equipment tools and equipment such as office
tables, chairs, computer, power
sprayer, backpack sprayers,
binoculars and handheld radios.
This resulted to a more efficient

means of maintaining their
plantations, better way of
communication when in the project
site and a much more efficient daily
office operation.
3. Opening of separate bank The PO opened separate bank

accounts for CSD accounts for Comprehensive Site
Development and Community
Forestry Development Fund.
They now practice a more efficient

means of keeping records of all their
financial transactions.
4. Hiring of women and children in The PO hired women and children

Nursery Operation specially on the potting of soil in
polybags, thus contributing their
29
share in augmenting the income of
their household.
5. Preparation of Business The People’s Organization was able to

Management Plan avail of the expertise of Ms. Anita L.
Ambrosio in the preparation of a
business management plan.
As a result, some of the members of

the association gained additional
knowledge and are presently utilizing
what they learned in the gathering of
data and preparation of a business
management plan.
6. Leveling-off of AP and PO The AP concentrated on assisting the

PO that resulted to a more
harmonious relationship between the
AP and the PO. He was able to
trouble shoot the problems faced by
the PO.
IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance of Subproject Facilities
1. Present Condition of Facilities
A. Please check: This article is (applicable due to problem(s) or not

applicable. No particular problem has occurred since the initial
operation started). If there have been any problems, please check
the relevant space in the Table.
PO
Initial Mainte- Manage- Others
Item Status Operation nance ment
PO Office Under 
Renovation
Power
Sprayer with Serviceable
Engine and
Cart
30
TH-16 L Serviceable
Sprayer
Hauling Truck Serviceable
Computer Serviceable
Printer Serviceable
Base Radio Non-

serviceable 
Kenwood
Radio Serviceable
Karaoke Serviceable

Manual Serviceable
Typewriter
Camera Serviceable
Mobile Phone Serviceable
Mobile Phone Non-

Antenna serviceable
Leroy Serviceable
Lettering Set
SUSIMO
Initial Mainte- Manage- Others
Item Status Operation nance ment
1 unit KIA Non-  

Ceres serviceable

1 unit KIA Serviceable
Crosstrak

3 units Serviceable
Motorcycle
1 unit Power Serviceable 
31
Generator
1 set Serviceable
Computer

1 unit Printer Serviceable
1 unit UPS Non- 

serviceable
1 unit GIS Serviceable
Maptitude
2 units GPS Serviceable
2 units Non- 
Handheld serviceable
Radio
1 unit Base Non- 

Radio serviceable
2 units Serviceable
Forester's
Transit

1 unit Manual Serviceable
Typewriter
4 units Serviceable
Brunton
Compass
2 units Steel Serviceable

Nylon Tape
2 units Serviceable
Diameter
Tape
1 unit
Planimeter Serviceable
4 units Abney Serviceable

Hand Level
32
1 unit Rain Serviceable
Guage
3 units 2 Serviceable
1 Non-
Binocular
Serviceable
1 unit Serviceable
Lettering Set
2 units Grass Serviceable

Cutter
SUSIMO Serviceable
Office
Site Serviceable
Engineer’s
Office
B. Please check: The problem(s) has arisen owing to the following

reason(s).
 Technical  Financial  Institutional  Economic

 Social/Distributional  Others
C. Description (in detail)
PO Facilities
Technical
- The Base Radio and the Mobile Phone Antenna malfunctioned.
The radio cannot transmit messages while the mobile phone was
not utilized because its technical specification did not fit the
current model of mobile phones bought by the PO.
Social / Distributional
- The PO office was not well supervised and properly managed
because the elected president and the vice president live in the
next barangay that they were not able to monitor the daily
operation of the office.
- The repair of the karaoke was not given priority at all inasmuch as
it was rarely used.
33
SUSIMO Facilities
Technical
- The Power Generator failed to generate electricity.
- There were occasions when the Base Radio malfunctioned and

unable to transmit messages.
- The battery packs of the handheld radios were not operational.

Those were sent to the DENR Central Office but were not
repaired.
- The typewriter had some missing letter keys .
- The UPS damage was found to be irrepairable.
Financial
- Because the maintenance of an inkjet printer is too costly, the
SUSIMO bought a dot matrix printer to replace the inkjet
printer.
Social/ Distributional
- The CENRO’s management has greater control over the use of
KIA Ceres. The KIA Crosstrak was used regularly by the SUSIMO
and sometimes borrowed by the CENRO.
D. Aspect of utilizing the Subproject facilities.
PO
Item Original Plan Actual Operation
PO Office For the use of the PO For the use of the PO
1 unit Power Sprayer For the use of the PO For the use of the PO
with Engine and Cart
3 sets TH-16 L For the use of the PO For the use of the PO
Sprayer
1 Hauling Truck For the use of the PO For the use of the PO
1 unit Computer For the use of the PO For the use of the PO
1 unit Printer For the use of the PO For the use of the PO
1 unit Base Radio For the use of the PO For the use of the PO
34
4 units Kenwood For the use of the PO For the use of the PO
Radio
1 unit Karaoke For the use of the PO For the use of the PO
2 units Manual For the use of the PO For the use of the PO
Typewriter
1 unit Camera For the use of the PO For the use of the PO
2 units Mobile Phone For the use of the PO For the use of the PO
1 unit Mobile Phone For the use of the PO For the use of the PO
Antenna
1 set Leroy Lettering For the use of the PO For the use of the PO
SUSIMO
Item Original Plan Actual Operation
1 unit KIA Ceres For the use of SUSIMO PENRO-CENRO-SUSIMO
(from ADB II
Project)
1 unit KIA Crosstrak For the use of SUSIMO PENRO-CENRO-SUSIMO
3 units Motorcycle For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO

(from ADB II
Project)
1 unit Power For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO

Generator
1 set Computer For the use of SUSIMO CENRO-SUSIMO
1 unit Printer For the use of SUSIMO CENRO-SUSIMO
1 unit UPS For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO
1 unit GIS Maptitude For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO
2 units GPS For the use of SUSIMO CENRO-SUSIMO
2 units Handheld For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO

Radio
35
1 unit Base Radio For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO-PO
2 units Forester's For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO-PO

Transit
1 unit Manual For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO

Typewriter
4 units Brunton For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO

Compass
2 units Steel Nylon For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO

Tape
2 units Diameter For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO

Tape
1 unit Planimeter For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO-PO
4 units Abney Hand For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO

Level
1 unit Rain Gauge For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO
3 units Binocular For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO
1 unit Lettering Set For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO
2 units Grass Cutter For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO
SUSIMO Office For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO
Site Engineer’s For the use of SUSIMO SUSIMO

Office from the Infra Engineer
2. Organization for Operation and Maintenance
A. Name of PO
a.1 Please give the name of PO and/or Body in Charge of O/M.

PO: Makasanyang Community Watershed Multi-Purpose Association, Inc.
(MACWMPAI)
Represented by: Ruben M. Abdilla
36
SUSIMO: Sisay-Datu Tumanggong Watershed Rehabilitation Subproject Site
Management Office
SMO: For. Reynaldo Cuaresma
a.2 Please check
The latest organization chart (or Equivalent) for O/M of the

Subproject facilities is (/ attached or  not available).
a.3 If the organization chart (or equivalent) is not available, please

state the reason.
B. Number of staff/workers of the PO or Body for Operation and

Maintenance of Subproject Facilities.
PO: 25 personnel
SUSIMO: 11 staff
C. Please check and explain the following.
c.1 The number of staff is currently ( sufficient or  insufficient).

If “insufficient”, please describe your estimate of the
optimum number of staff and your plans for providing them.
c.2 Average employment period of the present staff.
PO: six years

SUSIMO: 10 years
c.3 Availability of training program to promote the vocational ability

of the staff, its content and expected effects.
Plan for the training program to raise the vocational ability of

the staff has not materialized yet.
3. Annual Budget or actual expenditure for Operation and Maintenance (by

year)
A. Original Expected Expenditure
PO
Since the funds of the PO came from the billings of the accomplished CSD
activities, they were not able to plan or allocate funds for their operation and
also for the repair and maintenance of their equipment and facilities. But with
the completion of the project and the payment of retention fee, the PO will
37
project their expenses and will create a plan for proper allocation of their
finances including the repair and maintenance of their equipment and facilities.
SUSIMO
Item Maintenance Operation Total
Calendar Year
2000 - 0.265000 0.265000
2001 0.065000 0.157000 0.222000
2002 0.055000 0.355225 0.410225
2003 0.100000 0.507000 0.607000
TOTAL 0.220000 1.284225 1.504225
B. Actual and Currently Expected Expenditure
Financial records of the PO from 1997-2000 were not properly stored. Those
were destroyed due to exposure to elements.
PO
Item Maintenance Operation
Calendar Year Maintenance Operation (for expanded portion) Total
1999
Documentation 0.008758 0.008758
Subtotal 0.008758 0.008758
2000
Office 0.005100 0.005100
Supplies
Electricity 0.000579 0.000579
Subtotal 0.015779 0.015779
2001
38
Office 0.027704 0.027704
Supplies
Electricity 0.001667 0.001667
Subtotal 0.042036 0.042036
2002
Office 0.016832 0.016832
Supplies
Electricity 0.007346 0.007346
Subtotal 0.038575 0.038575
2003
Office 0.021806 0.021806
Supplies
Electricity 0.007370 0.007370
Bunkhouse and 0.098857 0.098857

Look-out
Tower
Computer 0.006000 0.006000
Subtotal 0.104857 0.037676 0.142533
2004
Hauling Truck 0.022000 0.022000
PO Office 0.200000 0.200000
Subtotal 0.222000 0.222000

TOTAL 0.104857 0.142824 0.222000 0.469681
39
SUSIMO
Item Maintenance Operation
Calendar Year Maintenance Operation (for expanded portion) Total
2001
KIA Ceres 0.013463 0.013463
Motorcycles 0.005705 0.005705
Gasoline/ 0.015657 0.015657

Diesel/ Oil/
Lubricant KIA
Ceres and
Motorcycles
0.073302 0.073302
Office
Equipment/
Supplies 0.002500 0.002500
Typewriter 0.002250 0.002250
Electricity 0.003237 0.003237
Communications/
Job order
(Sketch and 0.002289 0.002289
Building Plan)
Insurance/ LTO
Registration of
Vehicles
Subtotal 0.021668 0.101735 0.123403
2002
Motorcycles 0.004200 0.004200
Gasoline/ 0.055825 0.055825

Diesel/ Oil/
Lubricants of
KIA Ceres and
Motorcycles
40
Office
Equipment/
Supplies 0.003730 0.061470 0.065200
0.003730
Computer
0.00693 0.00693
Electricity
0.004273 0.004273
Communications/
Documentation
0.002800 0.002800
Office Rental
0.005730 0.005730
Labor/ Freight
(Equipment from
Manila)
Subtotal 0.007930 0.130791 0.138721
2003
KIA Crosstrak 0.081690 0.081690
KIA Ceres 0.012500 0.012500
Motorcycles 0.048346 0.048346
Gasoline/ 0.107248 0.107248

Diesel/ Oil/
Lubricants of
KIA Ceres and
Motorcycles
0.209005 0.209005
Office
Equipment/
Supplies 0.004622 0.004622
Computer/
Printer Ink 0.001500 0.001500
Manual 0.006582 0.006582

Typewriter
0.009278 0.009278
Electricity
Communications/ 0.027278 0.027278
41
Documentation
Insurance/ LTO
Registration of
Vehicles
Subtotal 0.144036 0.364013 0.508049
2004
Office Supplies 0.020000 0.020000
and Materials
Communication 0.005000 0.005000

Services
Repair and 0.020000 0.020000

Maintenance of
vehicles
Gasoline, Oil, 0.015000 0.015000

and Lubricants
Subtotal 0.020000 0.040000 0.060000

TOTAL 0.173634 0.596539 0.020000 0.040000 0.830173
Note: Actual and currently expected expenditure for expansion, replacement

or any other improvement purposes.
Please describe the basis for the above estimate and your financing plan for the
same.
The PO did not project their expenses because their finances were
dependent on their accomplishment and CSD Billings. For the year
2004, with the completion of the Subproject and the payment of
the retention fee, the PO started to plan their finances and
allocated funds for the maintenance and operation of the office, as
well as for the activities for maintenance and protection of the
plantations.
The National Forestation Development Office (NFDO), being the

Project Monitoring Office of the FSP, determined the financing
plan for the SUSIMO in the year 2000-2003. NFDO provided a
uniform amount of funding of the Operation and Maintenance of all
SUSIMO. The uniform amount of funding was given for all SUSIMO
42
for the first six months of 2004. Thereafter, the funding for the
O&M would be provided by the CENRO through regular MOOE
allocation.
4. Maintenance Method
PO Facilities
Content of Method Frequency
For Computer
Repair of Drive A
Replacement of Battery once, since acquired
once, since acquired
Bunkhouse and Look-out Tower
General Repair of Wall and Roofs Once, since constructed
SUSIMO
Content of Method Frequency
For KIA Crostrk

Change Oil every three months
Change Tire every four months
Replacement of Freon Tank of once, since acquired
Aircon
Add Freon of Aircon as needed
Wheel Alignment as needed
For KIA Ceres

Change Oil every four months
Overhaul of injection pump/bearing once, in CY 2002
For The Motorcycles

Change Oil every quarter
Overhaul twice, since acquired
Change Tire every four months
Computer
Replacement of computer fan Once, since acquired
Replacement of computer mouse Once, since acquired
43
Typewriter
Repair of keyboard (letters) Twice, since acquired
V. Benefits Derived from Subproject
1. Indirect Effect
A) Please choose and check item(s) which are dealt with this Article by
you.
 Technological transfer (e.g. application of technology used in the
Subproject to other similar projects and subprojects)
 Employment creating (e.g. during construction, contribution to the
sector(s) after completion)
 Income-raising (e.g. income of residents in the region)
 Other intended or unintended effects on the relevant sector(s)
and/or the region concerned
B) Please give details for each of the item(s) you checked.
1. Employment Creation
With the implementation of developmental activities under CSD,

road rehabilitation, data gathering and construction of offices in
the area, there were so many people who were hired/employed.
This largely contributed to their
income. Within five years of
implementation, the Subproject
generated a total of 212,325 man
days or created 170 full-time jobs
per year.
2. Income Raising
Employment generation provided additional income in the form of

wages which greatly improved the economic condition of the
project beneficiaries. Other forms of income were from the
business ventures of the PO’s individual livelihood activities and
individual income generating activities of the members. Before the
start of the project, the participating communities had an average
annual gross income of PHP 22,335.00 including off-farm, on-farm,
and non-farm activities. During project implementation, the off-
farm, on-farm, non-farm activities and the salary/wages provided
by the Subproject excluding their income from established
44
livelihood generated for them an average annual income of PHP
33,000.00 or approximately 48% increase in their income. This
is manifested in the improvement of the living condition of the PO
members. Houses were transformed to concrete ones with
galvanized iron roofing complete with appliances. Some were able
to buy working animals for their farms as well as goats as
additional source of income. Others were able to purchase
motorcycles for mobility.
3. Other intended or unintended effects on the relevant sector(s)

and/or the region concerned.
1. Rehabilitation of farm-to-market road. The area is now

accessible to outside community. It also opened new opportunities
for the residents and the whole community.
2. Occurrence of insurgency within the Subproject area was

minimized
3. The Subproject paved the way for harmony between the

Muslims and Christians within the Subproject area.
4. The PO helped in the advancement of education among the

community members.
5. Illegal logging activities within the Subproject area was

reduced. Some of the members of the PO were deputized or given
authority by the DENR to arrest illegal loggers within the
Subproject area.
6. Increased awareness on the sustainable use of the forest

resources. The PO committed to implement continuing information,
education and communication campaign for its members and non-
member residents. The campaigns were focused on sustainable use
of forest resources and on the preservation, maintenance and
protection of the watershed.
45
VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
 There may have been lapses in the conduct of the community organizing
but these were compensated by the accomplishments of the PO and its
effect on the communities and on other sectors.
 These accomplishments would not be realized without the support of the

DENR especially the SUSIMO.
 The success of the Subproject is also measured by the transformation

and enlightenment of the communities from being uninformed to being
active protectors and advocates of sustainable use of forest resources.
 The sustainability of the organization is assured with the establishment

of viable livelihood projects that would support future activities.
 For Comprehensive Site Development, it is recommended that site and

species identification, availability of planting materials and unit cost per
activity be based on prevailing situation and prices in the locality.
 It is recommended that the PO conducts information, education, and

communication campaigns on forest protection to include non-members
living within and adjacent the subproject sites, especially after project
funding. The IEC should be geared towards discouraging people from
burning debris found in their farms to avoid the unintentional
burning/damage of the established plantations.
 The people must be encouraged to be more vigilant in the conduct of

maintenance and protection activities in the Subproject.
 The PO should continue their linkaging with other government and non-
government entities to ensure sustainability of their organization
through livelihood assistance.
 The contracted Assisting Organization should attend to the more

relevant aspect of managerial training and value formation not only for
the officers but also for the members.
 In future undertakings, it is recommended that that the SUSIMO be

established in the early part of subproject implementation because of its
crucial role in strengthening the support monitoring mechanism of the
DENR to the PO.
46
 It is recommended that in hiring non-government organizations, a very
thorough examination on the capability of their personnel should be
done. Actual verification should be conducted to ensure that the
personnel committed to be assigned in the area are the ones actually
deployed. Violations should be dealt with proper legal measures.
 It is also important to further look into the financial capacity of the

NGO so that in cases of unavoidable delays in the processing of their
payments, they can continue with the activities to be conducted.
47
Forestry Sector Project
Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 1. TRAINING ATTENDED BY PEOPLE'S ORGANIZATION

# OF INCLUSIVE
TRAINING TRAINORS
PARTICIPANTS DATES
1 Social, Technical, and BERDFI 20 September 7-8,
Managerial Training 1998
2 Livelihood Training BERDFI 30 June 3-5, 1999
3 Orientation of CBFM NFDO and 15 January 17-20,
SUSIMO 2001
4 Training on Fire Prevention, PENRO and 30 March 5-7, 2002
Suppression, and Control SUSIMO
5 Training on Plant RTAI and DA 40 March 5-7, 2002
Propagation, Maintenance,
and Protection (w/ farm
cross visits)
6 Identification of OIDCI 20 September 16-18,
Alternative Livelihood 2001
7 SUSIMO Re-orientation FSP- TA, NFDO 5 March 19-23, 2001
Course
8 Training Workshop on OIDCI 30 October 17-20,
Business Plan Preparation 2003
9 FSP Phase-out/ Phase-in FSP- TA, NFDO 6 December 9-13,
Planning Workshop 2002
10 Training on Pests and PENRO, DA, and 20 December 18-19,
Diseases Prevention and SUSIMO 2004
Control
Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 2. SUBPROJECT PERFORMANCE
Year Planted Component Species Planted Area Planted Survival

(%)
1999 Reforestation Gmelina 181.58 85.32
Mahogany 293.70 85.32
Mangium 14.00 85.32
Rubber P. Rubber 593.33 68.75
Rattan Palasan 478.00 95.51
Bamboo Buho 62.00 80.29
Agroforestry Mango 27.89 94.66
Mahogany 25.00 85.32
Coffee 30.00 83.50
Mahogany 6.90 85.32
Banana 7.34 85.32
Coffee 8.14 83.50
Coffee 11.86 83.50
Banana 12.06 85.32
TOTAL 2,010.88 hectares

WASR 84.68%
* The 10.88 has. was an additional accomplishment on Reforestation Component.

Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 3. SUBPROJECT SITE MANAGEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT

Procured
ITEM Specifications Qty Cost (PhP)
Date/year procured
1. Truck KIA Crosstrak,
1 9/30/2002 680,000.00
4x4
2. Power Generator Engine, gosoline,
1 4/23/2001 44,096.00
GS, 3.5 KVA
3. Computer HP Brio PC Intel
Pentium III 733 1 2/20/2001 70,850.00
mhg
4. Printer HP Deskjet Model
1 4/27/2001 5,811.52
849 C
5. UPS Gamatronic
Compact model 1 4/15/2001 5,720.00
520VA
6. GIS Maptitude Comb. Of
Software & 1 3/28/2001 44,460.00
Geographic Data
7. GPS Global Positioning
2 3/28/2001 210,000.00
Power
8. Handheld Radiio VHF/FM COM
2 1/12/2001 29,933.28
model IC-F3GT
9. Base Radio VHF/FM ICOM
1 1/12/2001 64,789.92
10. Forester's Transit Surveying
Compass,
2 5/21/2001 65,680.00
Ushikita, model S-
27
11. Manual Typewriter Olivetti, 18
1 3/28/2001 8,309.60
carriage
12. Brunton Compass Kataoka br.,
4 3/28/2001 19,552.00
model BCD-90
13. Steel Nylon Tape Tajima br. 2 4/23/2001 2,700.00
14. Diameter Tape 2 3/29/2001 1,330.20
15. Planimeter OSKK KOIZUMI 1 10/26/2001 7,800.00
16. Abney Hand Level Model: OSK
4 5/21/2001 9,568.00
17251
17. Rain Guage Digital Rainwise 1 5/28/2001 6,300.00
18. Binocular 3 5/28/2001 12,168.00
19. Lettering Set Leroy set 1 5/28/2001 4,992.00
20. Grass Cutter Kawasaki 2 6/25/1905 30,000.00
GRAND TOTAL 1,324,060.52
Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 4. TRAINING ATTENDED BY SUSIMO

# OF INCLUSIVE
TRAINING TRAINORS PARTICIPANTS DATES
1 Orientation Course of
November 14-16,
Watershed Subprojects NFDO, FSP-TA 10
2000
SUSIMO
2 Orientation Workshop on the
Implementation of Capital Build-
DENR- Region 9 December 14,
Up System for Community-Based 10
FRDD 2000
Forest Management Project
3 Re-Echo Seminar/ Workshop on

January 25-26,
FSP Guidelines for PO's NFDO, FSP-TA 10
2001
Orientation and Action Planning
4 Mid-Year Assessment/ DENR- Region 9
10 June 12-15, 2002
Workshop Seminar RFDO
5 FSP Year-End Assessment NFDO, FSP-TA 10 May 21-23, 2003
6 Consultative Meeting/ Workshop
NFDO, FSP-TA 10 March 16-23, 2002
7 GPS Orientation Workshop NFDO, FSP-TA 10 April 5-10, 2001

Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 5a. LIVELIHOOD PROJECTS OF THE PO
Name of Livelihood Project : Rice Trading
Implementor : Makasanyang Community Watershed Multi-Purpose Association
No. of Beneficiaries : 438
Amount of investment : Php 65,000.00
Date of Feasibility Study : No FS
Date started : November 15, 2001
Status : On-going
Net Income : Php 135,000.00
CFDF : Php 1,307,963.58
Linkages Developed : Provincial CDA and Provincial Government of Sibugay

Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 5b. LIVELIHOOD PROJECTS OF THE PO
Name of Livelihood Project : Sawali Trading
Implementor : Makasanyang Community Watershed Multi-Purpose Association
No. of Beneficiaries : 438
Amount of investment : Php 10,000.00
Date of Feasibility Study : Dec-03
Date started : Feb-04
Status : On-going, Initial Operation
Net Income : None yet
CFDF : Php 1,307,963.58
Linkages Developed : Provincial CDA and Provincial Government of Sibugay

Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 6. SUBPROJECT STATUS REPORT

STATUS OF PROGRESS
NAME/LOCATION OF PROJECT PROJECT COST
Region (O:on going C: Completion)
THE SUBPROJECT AREA (ha) (Mil peso)
SMP CO CSD M & E INFRA
Sisay- Datu
Tumanggong
IX Watershed 2,010.88 59,188,701.78 C T C C C
Rehabilitation
Subproject
* No additional funding was allocated/ disbursed for the 10.88 has. additional accomplishment
C- Completed
T- Terminated
Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 7. SMP COST ESTIMATE PER ACTIVITY

TARGET UNIT OF UNIT
ACTIVITIES TOTAL COST
OUTPUT MEASURE COST
I. SURVEY AND MAPPING 2,000.00 has 425.00 850,000.00
a. Perimeter survey, area

computation, site
characterization and map
preparation
b. Contour Survey
c. Preparation of Control
Maps
d. Preparation of
Operations Map
e. Resource Inventory
2. Sectioning and Blocking 2,000.00 has 150.00 300,000.00
a. Installation of UTM
b. Installation of Corner
Posts
SUB-TOTAL 1,150,000.00
II. PLANNING
a. Data Synthesis and

analysis 2,000.00 has 50.00 100,000.00
b. Report Writing 2,000.00 has 50.00 100,000.00
SUB-TOTAL 200,000.00
GRANDTOTAL 2,000.00 has 675 1,350,000.00
Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 8. COMMUNITY ORGANIZING COST ESTIMATE PER ACTIVITY
UNIT of
ACTIVITIES TARGET UNIT COST TOTAL COST
MEASURE
1. Social Investigation 213,000.00
2. Information and
942,000.00
Education Campaign
3. Documentation Process 360,000.00
4. Identification of Possible
55,000.00
CBFMA
5. Organizing Activities 1,010,000.00
6. Community Activities 540,000.00
7. Project Management
468,000.00
Cost/ Reporting
Total 2,000 has 1,794.00 3,588,000.00
Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 9a. COST ESTIMATE FOR AGROFORESTRY PER ACTIVITY

UNIT OF TARGET
MAJOR ACTIVITY / ACTIVITY Unit Cost TOTAL COST
MEASURE OUTPUT
1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION sdlg 188,809.00 5.50 1,038,774.24
a. Nursery Site Preparation
b. Planting Stock
c. Bags
d. Soil Collection
e. Bagging
SUB-TOTAL 1,038,774.24
2. PLANTATION ESTABLISHMENT
a. Strip brushing/clearing has 157.00 686.54 107,786.37
b. Staking has 157.00 167.27 26,261.29
c. Hole Digging has 157.00 308.93 48,501.47
d. Hauling has 157.00 260.95 40,969.23
e. Planting has 157.00 309.44 48,581.52
3. MAINTENANCE & PROTECTION
a. Ringweeding and Cultivation has 157.00 3,769.08 591,745.28
b. Replanting (20%) has 157.00 1,179.89 185,243.33
c. Fertilizer Application has 157.00 1,812.98 284,637.61
d. Patrol Works has 157.00 548.03 86,040.35
e. Tools and materials has 157.00 15.00 2,355.00
SUB-TOTAL 1,150,021.57
4. ADMINISTRATION & SUPERVISION
a. First and Second Year has 27.89 546.49 15,241.56
b. Third Year has 87.24 423.75 36,968.10
c. Fourth Year has 157.00 257.42 40,415.19
d. Fifth Year has 157.00 403.59 63,363.31
e. Sixth Year has 157.00 542.28 85,137.62
G R A N D T O T A L has 157.00 17,210.33 2,702,021.47
Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 9b. COST ESTIMATE FOR BAMBOO PLANTATION PER ACTIVITY
UNIT OF TARGET
MEASURE OUTPUT
1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION sdlg 24,661 15.09 372,222.73

b. Planting Stock
c. Bags
d. Soil Collection
e. Bagging
a. Strip brushing/clearing has 62 2,177.42 135,000.00
b. Staking has 62 270.00 16,740.00
c. Hole Digging has 62 3,745.16 232,200.00
d. Hauling has 62 4,912.26 304,560.00
e. Planting has 62 2,483.87 154,000.00
a. Ringweeding and Cultivation has 62 14,127.96 875,933.76
b. Replanting has 62 2,273.03 140,927.97
c. Fertilizer Application has 62 314.50 19,499.20
d. Patrol Works has 62 821.64 50,941.93
e. Tools and materials has 62 3,018.41 187,141.45
SUB-TOTAL 1,274,444.31
a. First and Second Year has 62 623.54 38,659.65
b. Third Year has 62 187.76 11,641.09
c. Fourth Year has 62 651.68 40,404.20
d. Fifth Year has 62 484.42 30,034.03
e. Sixth Year has 62 514.95 31,926.61
G R A N D T O T A L has 62 42,610.20 2,641,832.62
Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 9c. COST ESTIMATE FOR RATTAN PLANTATION PER ACTIVITY
UNIT OF TARGET
MEASURE OUTPUT
1. SEEDLING PRODUCTION sdlg 242,643 9.91 2,403,575.21

b. Planting Stock
c. Bags
d. Soil Collection
e. Bagging
SUB-TOTAL 2,403,575.21
a. Strip brushing/clearing has 478 273.76 130,859.37
b. Staking has 478 455.52 217,740.00
c. Hole Digging has 478 347.64 166,170.00
d. Hauling has 478 843.12 403,010.00
e. Planting has 478 399.58 191,000.00
SUB-TOTAL 1,108,779.37
a. Ringweeding and Cultivation has 478 7,300.67 3,489,722.04
b. Replanting has 478 849.61 406,114.66
e. Tools and materials has 478 338.99 162,035.20
SUB-TOTAL 4,380,052.27
a. First and Second Year has 478 560.82 268,073.94
b. Third Year has 478 269.29 128,722.28
c. Fourth Year has 478 510.91 244,213.15
d. Fifth Year has 478 494.48 236,360.07
e. Sixth Year has 478 534.34 255,412.86
SUB-TOTAL 1,132,782.30
G R A N D T O T A L has 478.00 18,881.15 9,025,189.15
Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 9d. COST ESTIMATE FOR TREE PLANTATION/ REFORESTATION PER ACTIVITY
UNIT OF TARGET
MEASURE OUTPUT
b. Planting Stock
c. Bags
d. Soil Collection
e. Bagging
SUB-TOTAL 3,140,440.70
a. Strip brushing/clearing has 655.88 733.50 481,089.02
b. Staking has 655.88 302.16 198,177.80
c. Hole Digging has 655.88 619.61 406,389.91
d. Hauling has 655.88 602.94 395,456.00
e. Planting has 655.88 515.77 338,280.02
f. Tools and Materials has 655.88 152.47 100,000.00
SUB-TOTAL 1,919,392.75
a. Ringweeding and Cultivation (4 passes) has 655.88 10,450.17 6,854,055.38
b. Replanting (20%) has 655.88 1,094.04 717,559.52
c. Fertilizer Application (2 pass) has 655.88 914.57 599,846.71
d. Patrol Works has 655.88 870.11 570,684.82
e. Tools and materials has 655.88 14.75 9,675.00
SUB-TOTAL 8,751,821.43
4. CSD Infrastructure
a. Graded Trail km 39 2,538.46 99,000.00
c. Bunkhouse units 9 18,744.44 168,700.00
d. Lookout Tower units 10 3,680.00 36,800.00
b. Third Year has 546.48 279.62 152,809.33
c. Fourth Year has 655.88 384.86 252,420.72
d. Fifth Year has 655.88 504.31 330,767.87
e. Sixth Year has 655.88 519.23 340,550.49
SUB-TOTAL 1,296,950.33
G R A N D T O T A L has 655.88 23,499.89 15,413,105.21
Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 9e. COST ESTIMATE OF RUBBER PER ACTIVITY

UNIT OF TARGET
MEASURE OUTPUT
b. Planting Stock
c. Bags
d. Soil Collection
e. Bagging
SUB-TOTAL 1,474,871.75
a. Strip brushing/clearing has 658 304.96 200,663.28
b. Staking has 658 145.12 95,481.40
c. Hole Digging has 658 185.84 122,282.46
d. Hauling has 658 225.43 148,334.19
e. Planting has 658 123.16 81,036.27
a. Ringweeding and Cultivation has 658 3,433.54 2,259,267.88
b. Replanting (20%) has 658 624.70 411,050.53
e. Tools and materials has 658 16.25 10,692.46
SUB-TOTAL 3,570,409.56
b. Third Year has 593.33 354.05 210,071.29
c. Fourth Year has 658.00 381.95 251,322.71
d. Fifth Year has 658.00 400.93 263,812.69
e. Sixth Year has 658.00 533.73 351,193.65
SUB-TOTAL 1,485,377.62
G R A N D T O T A L has 658.00 10,909.51 7,178,456.53
Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 10. MONITORING AND EVALUATION COST ESTIMATE PER ACTIVITY

Unit
Target
ACTIVITIES of Unit Cost Total Cost
Output
Measure
Physical Validation Component
1. Verification of Boundaries, UTM monuments 2,000.00 has 38.35 76,697.72

and block corner post
2. Seedling Production/Inventory Analysis 2,000.00 has 52.25 104,496.20
3. Survival Inventory (height and diameter 2,000.00 has 807.16 1,614,315.58
measurements and related observations per
area/components and parcels
4. Documentation/Reports 2,000.00 has 206.99 413,984.80
5. Institutional/Environmental Impacts 2,000.00 has 177.98 355,969.60
S U B T O T A L 2,565,463.90
Institutional and Project Benefit Assessment
1. Preparatory activities 2,000.00 has 5.00 10,000.00
2. Primary data collection and preliminary 2,000.00 has 88.00 176,000.00

assessment
3. Documentation/Reports 2,000.00 has 14.50 29,000.00
S U B T O T A L 215,000.00
G R A N D T O T A L 2,000.00 has 1,390.23 2,780,463.90
Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 11. INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT
Infrastructure Project : Rehabilitation of Farm to Market Road
Location : Sisay, Tungawan, Zamboanga, Sibugay Province
Contractor : Lakewood Construction
Contract Cost : 13,951,371.25 Revised Contract Cost: 13,934,720.67
Contract Duration : 270 days
Effectivity of Notice to proceed : 27-Sep-02
Expected Completion date : 24-Jun-03
Revised Completion date : 30-Aug-03
Date of MOA with LGU :
Brief description : It is a 3.818 kilometer rehabilitated road with gravel pavement, 4,877.5 meters side
drainage ditch, and 10 culverts as cross drains. The rehabilitation of Farm-to-
Market Road was undertaken to support the established livelihood project of the
People's Organization.
Loan No. Ph-P 135
TABLE 12. ANNUAL WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN
1995 1996
Planned Actual
ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Planned Actual
Unit Cost Total Cost Unit Cost Total Cost Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget
1. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM 23,649.46 47,298,926.25 29,434.23 59,188,701.78

A. SMP 675.00 1,350,000.00 675.00 1,350,000.00 2,000.00 1,350,000.00 2,000.00 850,000.00 2,000.00 500,000.00
B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) 1,800.00 3,600,000.00 1,794.00 3,588,000.00
1. Old Sites
- Year 1
- Year 2
2. New Sites 1,800.00 3,600,000.00 1,794.00 3,588,000.00
- Year 1 1,174.00 2,348,000.00 1,132.00 2,264,000.00
- Year 2 626.00 1,252,000.00 662.00 1,324,000.00
C. CSD 12,742.50 25,485,000.00 18,666.21 37,535,517.21
1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 289.50 579,006.80 287.46 574,912.23
2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC 39,084.53 2,423,240.69 42,610.20 2,641,832.62
a. Infrastructure
b. Trails and footpath
c. Plantation 39,084.53 2,423,240.69 42,610.20 2,641,832.62
c.1. Streambank Stabilization (Bamboo) 39,084.53 2,423,240.69 42,610.20 2,641,832.62
3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) 11,601.01 22,482,752.51 17,609.48 34,318,772.36
a. Agroforestry 11,233.43 1,763,648.14 15,982.62 2,702,021.47
b. Assisted Natural Regeneration
c. Enrichment Planting
d. Tree Plantation 11,633.41 20,719,104.37 17,764.02 31,616,750.89
d.1. Bamboo
d.2. Rattan 12,294.26 5,876,655.53 18,881.15 9,025,189.15
d.3. Mangrove
d.4. Plantation Species 13,603.32 8,774,140.10 23,940.08 15,413,105.21
d.5. Rubber 9,222.35 6,068,308.74 10,909.51 7,178,456.53
e. Timber Stand Improvement
4. Inventory Residual Forest
5. Income Enhancement Project
D. Infrastructure Component 13,951,371.25 13,934,720.67
E. Monitoring & Evaluation 1,456.28 2,912,555.00 1,390.23 2,780,463.90
- Year 1 319.99 639,975.00 313.25 626,508.50
- Year 2 385.79 771,580.00 326.48 652,955.40
- Year 3 750.50 1,501,000.00 750.50 1,501,000.00
2. SUSIMO 2,455,815.00 2,455,815.00

Equipment provided to the Office
Researches conducted
Trainings
Others
GRAND TOTAL 24,877.37 49,754,741.25 30,655.49 61,644,516.78 1,350,000.00 850,000.00 - 500,000.00

Loan No. Ph-P 135
1998 1999 2000

ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Planned Actual Planned Actual
Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget
1. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM
A. SMP
B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) 2,000.00 2,348,000.00 2,000.00 2,264,000.00 2,000.00 1,252,000.00 2,000.00 561,000.00 - - 2,000.00 445,500.00
1. Old Sites
- Year 1
- Year 2
2. New Sites 2,000.00 2,348,000.00 2,000.00 2,264,000.00 2,000.00 1,252,000.00 2,000.00 561,000.00 - - 2,000.00 445,500.00
- Year 1 2,000.00 2,348,000.00 2,000.00 2,264,000.00
- Year 2 2,000.00 1,252,000.00 2,000.00 561,000.00 2,000.00 445,500.00
C. CSD 1,357.44 12,204,500.32 1,622.61 3,796,333.74 2,000.00 8,605,016.32 1,650.50 8,779,992.82 2,000.00 4,675,483.36 1,767.05 5,611,370.98
1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 2,000.00 579,006.80 2,000.00 574,912.23
2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC 62.00 1,266,335.31 62.00 224,218.20 62.00 961,215.78 62.00 1,428,885.29 62.00 195,689.60 62.00 504,002.56
a. Infrastructure
c. Plantation 62.00 1,266,335.31 62.00 224,218.20 62.00 961,215.78 62.00 1,428,885.29 62.00 195,689.60 62.00 504,002.56
c.1. Streambank Stabilization (Bamboo) 62.00 1,266,335.31 62.00 224,218.20 62.00 961,215.78 62.00 1,428,885.29 62.00 195,689.60 62.00 504,002.56
3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) 1,295.44 10,359,158.21 1,560.61 3,572,115.54 1,938.00 7,643,800.54 1,588.50 6,776,195.30 1,938.00 4,479,793.76 1,705.05 5,107,368.42
a. Agroforestry 104.67 860,469.88 1,200.00 157.00 505,645.14 27.89 92,435.46 157.00 397,533.12 93.24 977,869.92
d. Tree Plantation 1,190.77 9,498,688.33 1,560.61 3,570,915.54 1,781.00 7,138,155.40 1,560.61 6,683,759.84 1,781.00 4,082,260.64 1,611.81 4,129,498.50
d.1. Bamboo
d.2. Rattan 308.31 3,267,609.18 478.00 1,587,921.37 478.00 1,686,928.03 478.00 3,103,592.35 478.00 922,118.32 478.00 1,165,862.67
d.3. Mangrove
d.4. Plantation Species 443.76 4,328,498.91 489.28 1,369,481.82 645.00 3,247,249.79 489.28 2,218,299.97 645.00 1,198,391.40 540.48 1,908,001.34
d.5. Rubber 438.70 1,902,580.24 593.33 613,512.35 658.00 2,203,977.58 593.33 1,361,867.52 658.00 1,961,750.92 593.33 1,055,634.49
D. Infrastructure Component
E. Monitoring & Evaluation 2,000.00 639,975.00 2,000.00 626,508.50 2,000.00 771,580.00 2,000.00 652,955.40
- Year 1 2,000.00 639,975.00 2,000.00 626,508.50
- Year 2 2,000.00 771,580.00 2,000.00 652,955.40
- Year 3
2. SUSIMO 356,000.00 356,000.00

Trainings
Others
GRAND TOTAL 14,552,500.32 6,060,333.74 10,496,991.32 9,967,501.32 5,803,063.36 7,065,826.38

Loan No. Ph-P 135
2001 2002 2003

ACTIVITIES Planned Actual Planned Actual Planned Actual
Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget Target Budget
1. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM
A. SMP
B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) - - - - - - - - - - 2,000.00 317,500.00
1. Old Sites
- Year 1
- Year 2
2. New Sites - - - - - - - - - - 2,000.00 317,500.00
- Year 1
- Year 2 2,000.00 317,500.00
C. CSD - 1,884.87 5,352,177.97 2,010.88 8,055,462.00 - 2,010.88 5,940,179.70
1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping
2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC - - 62.00 126,009.48 - - 62.00 296,352.01 - - 62.00 62,365.08
a. Infrastructure
c. Plantation - - 62.00 126,009.48 - - 62.00 296,352.01 - - 62.00 62,365.08
c.1. Streambank Stabilization (Bamboo) 62.00 126,009.48 62.00 296,352.01 62.00 62,365.08
3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) - - 1,822.87 5,226,168.49 - - 1,948.88 7,759,109.99 - - 1,948.88 5,877,814.62
a. Agroforestry 139.68 557,980.55 - - 169.06 529,331.81 - - 169.06 543,203.73
d. Tree Plantation - - 1,683.19 4,668,187.94 - - 1,779.82 7,229,778.18 - - 1,779.82 5,334,610.89
d.1. Bamboo
d.2. Rattan 478.00 1,150,966.43 478.00 1,301,423.25 478.00 715,423.08
d.3. Mangrove
d.4. Plantation Species 591.77 2,496,211.01 643.82 4,306,399.80 643.82 3,114,711.27
d.5. Rubber 613.42 1,021,010.50 658.00 1,621,955.13 658.00 1,504,476.54
D. Infrastructure Component 2,000.00 13,951,371.25 2,000.00 13,934,720.67
- Year 1
- Year 2
- Year 3 2,000.00 1,501,000.00 2,000.00 1,501,000.00
2. SUSIMO 495,000.00 432,138.81 723,475.00 718,197.87 881,340.00 949,478.32

Trainings
Others
GRAND TOTAL 495,000.00 5,784,316.78 723,475.00 8,773,659.87 16,333,711.25 22,642,878.69

Loan No. Ph-P 135
Planned (TOTAL) Actual (TOTAL)

ACTIVITIES
Target Budget Target Budget
1. REFORESTATION/WATERSHED/CBFM 2,000.00 47,298,926.25 2,010.88 59,188,701.78

A. SMP 2,000.00 1,350,000.00 2,000.00 1,350,000.00
B. CO (Phase 1 & 2) 2,000.00 3,600,000.00 2,000.00 3,588,000.00
1. Old Sites
- Year 1
- Year 2
2. New Sites 2,000.00 3,600,000.00 2,000.00 3,588,000.00
- Year 1 2,000.00 2,348,000.00 2,000.00 2,264,000.00
- Year 2 2,000.00 1,252,000.00 2,000.00 1,324,000.00
C. CSD 2,000.00 25,485,000.00 2,010.88 37,535,517.21
1. Delineation, Landuse Survey & Mapping 2,000.00 579,006.80 2,000.00 574,912.23
2. Soil Erosion Control/SWC 62.00 2,423,240.69 62.00 2,641,832.62
a. Infrastructure -
b. Trails and footpath -
c. Plantation 62.00 2,423,240.69 62.00 2,641,832.62
c.1. Streambank Stabilization (Bamboo) 62.00 2,423,240.69 62.00 2,641,832.62
3. Vegetative Measures (Plantation Establishment) 1,938.00 22,482,752.51 1,948.88 34,318,772.36
a. Agroforestry 157.00 1,763,648.14 169.06 2,702,021.47
b. Assisted Natural Regeneration - -
c. Enrichment Planting - -
d. Tree Plantation 1,781.00 20,719,104.37 1,779.82 31,616,750.89
d.1. Bamboo - -
d.2. Rattan 478.00 5,876,655.53 478.00 9,025,189.15
d.3. Mangrove - -
d.4. Plantation Species 645.00 8,774,140.10 643.82 15,413,105.21
d.5. Rubber 658.00 6,068,308.74 658.00 7,178,456.53
e. Timber Stand Improvement - -
4. Inventory Residual Forest - -
5. Income Enhancement Project - -
D. Infrastructure Component 13,951,371.25 13,934,720.67
- Year 1 2,000.00 639,975.00 2,000.00 626,508.50
- Year 2 2,000.00 771,580.00 2,000.00 652,955.40
- Year 3 2,000.00 1,501,000.00 2,000.00 1,501,000.00
2. SUSIMO 2,455,815.00 2,455,815.00

Trainings
Others
GRAND TOTAL 2,000.00 49,754,741.25 2,010.88 61,644,516.78

Mango Plantation at campo 11 area.
Mahogany Plantation Lawis area.
Sari-sari store - one of the livelihood Sawali Making - another livelihood Pro-
project. ject.
Maintenance and protection of Rubber Fertilizer application of Mahogany plan-

component. tation.
Rattan plantation at Makuyon area. Rubber plantation at Campo 11 area.
Bunkhouse at Likatunan area. Nursery of Rubber seedlings at main nurse-

ry.
Completed Farm to Market Road. Box culvert

SMP-Philippine Economic, Ecological and Social Service Foundation, Inc.
PRESIDENT
Silvestre A. Canama
SECRETARY
Joel Alasco
VICE PRESIDENT TREASURER AUDITOR

Edwin Jarmin Jose Recalde Rolendo Pausal
GEODETIC ENGINEER FORESTER

Randalf Zayas Antonio Agraviador
CO-Renewed Tribal Association, Inc.
PRESIDENT
SECRETARY
VICE PRESIDENT TREASURER

AUDITOR
FORESTER AGRICULTURIST Community Project Legal SOCIAL PHOTOGRAPHER

Organizing Development Counsel WORKER
Officer Officer
M&E-Gamut Ug Salingsing Sa Bohol, Inc.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
ENGR. MELCHOR M. LANZADERAS

President & Chief Executive Officer
DR. RODOLFO VALMORIA

Chairman, Project Committee
MONITORING AND COMMUNITY ORGANIZING

ENGINEERING PROJECT
EVALUATION & DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
PROJECT MANAGER
ENGR. RODULFO CREDO EMILLIANO GRAFIA
PROJECT ENGINEER Project Manager Project Manager
SYLVIA RAMOS COMMUNITY ORGANIZER/

FOREMEN Project Inspector/ Coordinator CD OFFICER
SUPPORT STAFF
LABORERS (To be hired locally)
LABORERS
Infrastructure –Lakewood Construction Company
Roger Duran
Project Manager
Prudencio Ediza Jose Bantillo

Asst. Project Manager- Resident Asst. R.E/ Matris Qual.
Engineer Control
Jocelyn I. Tiu Victor Baluarte

Administrative Officer Geodetic Engineer
Mario Apas
Construction Foreman
Leadman Leadman Leadman Leadman

Road Construction Concrete Riprapping Works Hauling and Equipment
Works Maintenance
Survey Aide and Masons, Carpenters, Masons, Riprappers Operators, Drivers,

Skilled Laborers Steelman, and Laborers and Laborers Mechanics, and Helpers
PO-Makasanyang Community Watershed Multi-Purpose Association, Inc.
GENERAL
ASSEMBLY
BOARD OF
TRUSTEES
CHAIRMAN
V- CHAIRMAN
TREASURER
AUDITOR
BOARD SECRETARY
TRUSTEES
VARIOUS PO CHAIRMAN SECRETARY TO THE

COMMITTES BOT
TECHNICAL UNIT AREA SUPERVISOR ADMIN AND

HEAD FINANCE
SUPPORT UNIT
HEAD
FORESTER PLANTATION
WORKERS ACCOUNTANT
AGRICULTURIST
CASHIER
SURVEY TEAM
BOOKKEEPER
CLERK
UTILITY/
WATCHMAN
Sisay-Datu Tumanggong Watershed Rehabilitation
Subproject Site Management Office
REYNALDO C. CUARESMA
SMO
PAULA C. HASIM RAMON BLANCO

ASU Head A.P.
ANTONIA T. NESTOR B.
CADALSO JASMIN
ASU staff Driver
REYNALDO C. CESARIO C. ADOLFO V.

CUARESMA SABLAS BUCOY
SDMU Head COSU Head VBU Head
ANTONIA T. ANGELITA P. JOSEPH A.

CADALSO CARACOL CELESTIAL
SDMU Staff COSU Staff VBU Staff
CO-Basilan Environment Resources Development Foundation, Inc.
MANAGER
Monitoring/
Evaluation
Officer
FINANCE/
ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS/ TECHNICAL
SECTION OPERATIONS SECTION
(In- Charge) Field Operations Manager
Community Agro-
Accounting/ Personnel/ Organizer Specialist
Cashiering Pool
Services
Marine
Forester Fisheries
Accountant Specialist
Bookkeeper Community
Draftsman/
Illustrator Organizer
Coastal
Management
Specialist
Disbursing Radio
Officer Forester
Operator
IEC
Specialist
Accounting Computer
Clerk/ Operator Social Welfare & Health
Cashier Specialist
Livelihood/ Cooperative
Driver/ Specialist
Messenger
Infrastructure
Specialist
Utility
Geodetic/ Land Survey

Specialist
Nutritionist
TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION
Sisay-Datu Tumanggong Watershed Subproject
Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter)

1-2 S 71 ° 39 ' E 963.36
2-3 S 69 ° 26 ' W 1,051.85
3-4 S 28 ° 48 ' W 97.81
4-5 N 89 ° 3 ' W 472.36
5-6 N 57 ° 50 ' W 287.23
6-7 N 32 ° 22 ' W 241.84
7-8 N 67 ° 22 ' W 314.49
8-9 N 13 ° 41 ' W 209.90
9-10 N 81 ° 33 ' W 181.71
10-11 N 71 ° 52 ' W 221.00
11-12 N 60 ° 45 ' W 261.29
12-13 S 36 ° 8 ' E 77.35
13-14 S 59 ° 47 ' W 1,526.91
14-15 N 69 ° 31 ' W 1,710.19
15-16 N 55 ° 57 ' W 1,756.90
16-17 N 10 ° 18 ' W 1,557.60
17-18 N 71 ° 20 ' E 432.89
18-19 N 42 ° 35 ' E 944.06
19-20 N 74 ° 26 ' E 1,155.57
20-21 S 73 ° 19 ' E 1,168.76
21-22 S 88 ° 11 ' E 421.68
22-23 N 75 ° 1 ' E 145.50
23-24 S 37 ° 36 ' E 100.99
24-25 S 87 ° 6 ' E 103.59
25-26 S 64 ° 37 ' E 235.09
26-27 N 66 ° 44 ' E 359.06
27-28 N 80 ° 19 ' E 305.69
28-29 S 7 ° 51 ' E 733.19
29-30 S 75 ° 53 ' E 277.61
30-31 N 88 ° 47 ' E 73.41
31-32 N 11 ° 24 ' E 103.06
32-33 S 74 ° 51 ' E 123.96
33-34 S 14 ° 57 ' E 176.47
34-35 S 78 ° 28 ' E 285.25
TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION
Sisay-Datu Tumanggong Watershed Subproject
Corner BEARING DISTANCE (meter)

35-36 N 89 ° 51 ' E 212.37
36-37 S 14 ° 11 ' E 274.43
37-38 S 61 ° 25 ' W 246.38
38-39 S 18 ° 18 ' E 112.20
39-40 S 84 ° 40 ' W 414.78
40-41 N 70 ° 26 ' E 294.98
41-42 S 79 ° 53 ' W 110.24
42-43 S 55 ° 38 ' W 209.11
43-44 S 89 ° 50 ' E 599.96
44-45 S 0 ° 39 ' E 502.91
45-46 S 88 ° 34 ' E 124.44
46-47 N 17 ° 59 ' W 141.81
47-48 N 61 ° 30 ' E 159.56
48-49 S 25 ° 51 ' E 370.24
49-50 S 4 ° 23 ' E 380.28
50-51 N 88 ° 52 ' E 390.67
51-52 S 1 ° 23 ' E 508.38
52-1 S 53 ° 6' W 415.73
Reference point:
Corner 1: long-X 122 ° 22 ' 17 "
lat-Y 7 35 ' 14 "

Sisay PCR

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sisay PCR

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

LIST OF ACRONYMS

Executive Summary ------------------------------------------------------------- i

I. Subproject Description ------------------------------------------------------ 1

II. Subproject Implementation ----------------------------------------------- 13

III. Action taken by the AO, AP, and PO ------------------------------------ 29

IV. Initial Operation and Maintenance

V. Benefits Derived from the Project ---------------------------------------- 44

VI. Conclusions and Recommendations ---------------------------------------- 46

Table 1 : Trainings Attended by the PO ----------------------------------------- 48

Table 2 : Subproject Performance ---------------------------------------------- 49

Table 3 : Subproject Site Management Office Equipments -------------------- 50

Table 4 : Trainings Attended by the SUSIMO --------------------------------- 51

Table 5a : Rice Trading Livelihood Project of the PO--------------------------- 52

Table 5b : Sawali Trading Livelihood Project of the PO------------------------ 53

Table 6 : Subproject Status Report --------------------------------------------- 54

Table 7 : SMP Cost Estimate Per Activity -------------------------------------- 55

Table 8 : Community Organizing Cost Estimate Per Activity ------------------ 56

Table 9a : Cost Estimate for Agroforestry Per Activity ----------------------- 57

Table 9b : Cost Estimate for Bamboo Plantation Per Activity------------------ 58

Table 9c : Cost Estimate for Rattan Plantation Per Activity ------------------ 59

Table 9e : Cost Estimate for Rubber Plantation Per Activity ----------------- 61

Table 10 : Monitoring and Evaluation Cost Estimate ---------------------------- 62

Table 11 : Infrastructure Project ----------------------------------------------- 63

Table 12 : Annual Work and Financial Plan -------------------------------------- 64

1. Organizational Structure ------------------------------------------------ 68

3. CSD Accomplishment Map ------------------------------------------------- 77

The Community-Based Forest Management Program (CBFMP)

The Sisay-Datu Tumanggong Watershed Subproject covers Barangays

Implementation of the Subproject was weighed down by troubles right

All of these however were surmounted especially with the installation of

The goal to rehabilitate the Subproject’s brushland and grassland areas

Involvement in Comprehensive Site Development activities, road

Employment in the Subproject and involvement in business ventures

The rehabilitation of the 3.8 kilometers farm-to-market road on the

The trainings availed of by the members among others, were on

SISAY-DATU TUMANGGONG WATERSHED REHABILITATION

Loan Agreement No. PH-P 135

The Sisay-Datu Tumanggong Watershed Subproject covers Barangays Sisay

A) Original (at the time of appraisal)

1. To rehabilitate and develop the grassland and brushland areas by

3. To capacitate and empower the communities for proper management

4. To provide a mechanism for the stewardship and sustainable

a. Modified purpose/objectives N/A

2. Subproject Scope and Dimension

A. Comparison of Original and Actual Scope & Dimensions

a.1 Please check; There has been ( revision and/or modification or

a.2 if “revision and/or modification”, please complete the

Original Scope and Revised/Modified

A. SMP Schedule: September 15, Schedule: September 15,

Target Area: 2,000 ha Area: 2,000 ha

B. CO1 Schedule: July 31, 1997 to Schedule: July 31, 1997 to

Target Activities: Activities Conducted:

2. Information, Education 2. Information, Education

3. Documentation Process 3. Documentation Process

5. Organizing Activities 5. Organizing Activities

6. Community Activities 6. Community Activities

7. Project Management 7. Project Management

E. MONITORING AND Inspection Chart Mapping

Year 2 2,000 has (Physical)

2,000 has (Institutional)

Activities for Physical

Activities for Institutional

Equipment provided to the N/A 1 unit KIA Ceres