Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BCG - Buy Now Pay Later Paper
BCG - Buy Now Pay Later Paper
September 2021
1
C
lick, buy, pay later: This new payments business model, in which consumers defer
and/or split payments or obtain instant credit on their purchases, is soaring in
popularity. Fueled by rising participation in e-commerce, many buy-now-pay later
(BNPL) operators have seen their valuations rise sharply over recent years. Still,
as is often the case with fast-growing technology plays, the outlook is far from certain.
Competition is intensifying and the industry’s relentless growth is attracting regulatory
attention. As a result, the BNPL segment presents financial industry players with risks as
well as opportunities.
BNPL fintechs such as Klarna, Afterpay, Affirm, Zip Co, and Sezzle are tapping into an
accelerating retail shift online—helping consumers make instant purchasing decisions
without immediate funds or savings. All that is required is to check out on a website or
app and commit to a payment plan — often with no interest to pay. From the consumer’s
point of view, there is a lot to love. However, online retail stores also benefit. They see
increased traffic, bigger shopping baskets, higher conversion rates, and repeat
customers—while their financial cost (so called merchant discount rate) is usually a
transaction fee of 1-6% depending on local market conditions and competitive
environment. Behind this “everyone’s a winner” formula are advanced analytics and risk
engines that manage borrower approvals and customer marketing in real time.
With many of the world’s best-known brands and retailers embracing BNPL, the market
is expanding fast. Total transaction value in five key markets (US, UK, Europe, UAE and
Indonesia) reached around $42 billion in 2020. In the UK, BNPL schemes are expected to
account for 10 percent of e-commerce payments by 2024, and EU penetration is predicted
to rise from 5.9% in 2019 to 8.9% in 2023.1 In Australia, around 20% of consumers regularly
use BNPL and more than 60% of merchants (online and offline) are signed up.
Given the success of first movers (Sweden’s Klarna, launched in 2005, posted $1.3 billion
of revenues in 2020), competition is heating up, amid strong venture capital interest. At
the same time, established providers such as banks and payment companies are looking
to catch-up, including offering BNPL-type financing for bigger-ticket transactions. In the
background, the regulatory playing field is evolving. The mature Australian market, for
example, is seeing increasing calls from highly-regulated credit providers for a more level
playing field.
Amid narrowing margins, the BNPL business model is evolving. Some players with the
necessary risk management capabilities are migrating from short-term loans and
merchant-funded business models to longer-term and consumer-funded approaches.
Others are expanding internationally to achieve scale, as well as building out their product
offerings beyond BNPL, and moving into physical retail. With a significant chunk of the
1
Growth projection for European Union according to FIS Worldpay “Global Payments Report 2021”.
e-commerce payments value chain in play, incumbent banks and other financial services
providers face a dilemma. Do they hop on board now, or wait for a shake out on the
expectation that the regulatory and commercial playing field will become more certain?
Here we outline recent dynamics and discuss actions that traditional players may consider
before taking the plunge.
BNPL is popular among consumers who wish to defer payments without feeling they are
getting into debt. BNPL enables them to purchase instantly via products that are usually
structured as short-term, interest-free (pay in X) loans. These are usually paid back via bi-
weekly payments or full repayment after a few weeks (see Table 1 for a comparison of
BNPL variations).
The closest comparables to the “modern” BNPL products are “traditional” point of sale
and installment loans. The traditional PoS loan, however, is generally used for higher-
ticket purchases, with the cost spread over something like 12-24 monthly payments.
Installment loans can be facilitated as standalone facilities or via cards and would
typically also be applied to larger purchases.
Of course, the rest of the industry is not standing still. One of the responses we’ve seen
from some banks – particularly in the US – has been to allow customers to convert credit
card purchases (typically $100+) to fixed-term installment loans, often for a fee. While this
is lower cost to the consumer, compared to the typical APR on a credit card, it is more
expensive than an interest-free offering. It does, however, offer ubiquity in terms of
merchant acceptance (any purchase can be split) and allows credit card users to continue
earning rewards for their purchases.
In addition, BNPL faces rising challenges in its own business model. Amid increasing
competition, the space is increasingly commoditized, with pricing and margins under
pressure. Mature markets such as the UK and Germany, as well as heavily penetrated
industry verticals such as fashion and retail, face profitability challenges. The merchant-
funded segments of ‘Pay in X’ and ‘Pay in full later’, offering terms of less than six months,
are most affected, and these account for the majority of the market in Europe.
As a result of these dynamics, BNPL companies are exploring new revenue streams, with
some expanding into more traditional consumer finance. Fintechs including Affirm,
Afterpay, Klarna, and Zip/QuadPay are among those that are building (or at least
evaluating) a presence in physical PoS or entering less-crowded and slightly more
expensive online verticals such as white goods, electronics, and auto-financing. One
drawback of the latter is that these purchases are often exposed to higher levels of fraud.
There is also more general shift to longer-term (12+ months) installment loans. In addition,
some companies have launched credit cards, current accounts, and have strengthened
affiliate marketing programs to access new revenue streams.
debit card solutions. These will serve both to expand the product offering and
enhance data-driven decision making. Klarna offers credit cards and current
accounts, and is moving toward becoming a neo-bank. It is also shifting into
commerce, for example via its recent purchase of German shopping app Stocard.
Recent reports suggests that Apple and Goldman Sachs will launch their own BNPL
propositions in the US, building on the success of the Apple Pay credit card and
digital wallet.
6. Bold internationalization: Some firms have been decisive in expanding across
borders, often acquiring competitors (for example Afterpay’s 2018 acquisition of
the UK’s ClearPay) to establish market position.
Finally, few BNPL players achieve sustainable growth without a business plan that
establishes a clear path to profitability. For most BNPL firms, revenues are derived from
the twin sources of merchant fees and interest payments/other fees paid by consumers
(e.g., for 12+ month installment loans). In addition, most leading players are positioning
themselves as partners and facilitators of merchant incremental sales. They are focusing
on value-added services such as loyalty and reward schemes, as well as targeting
consumers directly— as seen with shopping platform offers. Looking forward, affiliate
marketing could generate significant revenues, with high levels of merchant traffic
originating in BNPL apps. PayPal has leveraged its $4 billion acquisition of Honey, a
browser extension that searches for deals, to expand its ‘Pay in 4’ product, after deriving
significant affiliate market revenues from shopping traffic.
There are also financial clouds gathering. BNPL is booming in Australia, US, Europe, and
some parts of Asia (key markets are UAE, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, India, and the
Philippines). However, competition in the absence of consolidation is likely to compress
margins in the short term, particularly with players including PayPal and Apple offering
it for free or at a much lower price (PayPal’s recent pricing changes suggest an at-most 50
bps premium for Pay-in-4).
The dominant group of BNPL players is (mature) fintechs, many of which have built their
businesses after first establishing themselves in their domestic markets. The most
successful have expanded into multiple geographies and product segments. Market leader
Klarna raised funding at nearly a $46 billion valuation in 2021, putting it among the
highest-valued fintechs in Europe. (See Exhibit 1) Square also reached a deal to acquire
Afterpay for $29 billion in August 2021. Still, international expansion is expensive (a
potential challenge to the current boom)— especially early on, when the company is
building a database in the “new” market to support credit decisions. On the other hand,
investors are usually willing to absorb losses in the growth phase to achieve scale.
Note: Only main geographical areas are presented here, with a selection of BNPL firms (illustrative and not exhaustive), several other
players compete in these markets. Valuation is in $ billion per July 2021. Source: BCG FinTech Control Tower and Pitchbook, Enterprise
valuations from Yahoo Finance, Stockopedia
As the market evolves, two primary business models are emerging. Market participants
focus either on branded offerings or white label solutions that operate under merchant
banners. The latter tends to be prevalent in markets such as Germany, where many
merchants already offer BNPL via white label cooperations. However, in either case, as
market participants jostle for share, there is likely to be rising pressure on the bottom line.
To remain competitive and protect revenue pools, incumbents are required to make bold
decisions, and to leverage their core strengths in terms of trust, data, and expertise.
Looking forward, a key success factor will be volume-driven growth, with high numbers
of merchants and customers engaging. Banks in a strong starting position—with an
offering that spans merchant services, SMB banking and retail banking products—should
evaluate development of their own BNPL offerings. An own BNPL offer would allow them
to participate in the growing BNPL market and offer a solution to their own merchant
customer base. They will need to build on their branding, existing customer relationships,
lending and risk management capabilities, as well as aim to match fintech products,
technology, and user experiences. Table stakes include a compelling digital customer
experience and real-time approval processes that are oven-ready to be integrated with
online checkout and/or physical PoS technologies (e.g., via cards or QR codes), as well as
consumer banking touchpoints, including debit and credit cards. Where banks and issuers
lack the capabilities to build their own BNPL solutions, partnership is an option. Given
BNPL’s growth trajectory, this will be a better option than doing nothing.
Alongside banks and issuers, networks such as Mastercard or Visa are ramping up their
involvement. MasterCard and Visa are doubling down on their installment solutions to
make it easier for issuing partners to provide loans. Visa recently rolled out its installment
solution in Canada with partner banks to turn any card purchase into a potential BNPL
payment and is testing pilot BNPL programs in key markets like US and Russia. American
Express has expanded its ‘Pay It Plan It’ feature to its proprietary credit cards, all easily
accessible within its app. Networks are also expanding through M&A and strategic
partnerships, as evidenced by MasterCard’s 2019 purchase of Vyze and later partnership
with Quadpay/Zip. However, to remain competitive, networks will need to tap into in
their technical capabilities and leverage their unique positions in the payments value
chain, aiming to further simplify their BNPL merchant propositions. Networks may also
have to weigh the pros and cons of establishing deeper and more direct relationships with
key merchants. Until now, they have had relatively distant associations through acquirers.
Finally, Payment Service Providers (and acquirers) must be ready to integrate the most
popular BNPL offerings (which can vary by local markets) into their merchant offerings.
From BNPL players’ perspective, PSPs are important sales channels (against a referral
fee); in particular those with a strong position in relevant industry verticals. However, the
PSPs may also need to defend their own merchant relationships, particularly if BNPL
players provide checkout solutions themselves and connect directly to (large) merchants.
* * *
BNPL is more than an incremental addition to the payments and consumer finance
landscape. Our expectation is that it will become a mainstream e-commerce (and
potentially soon also in offline in-store) payment option in most major markets. Indeed,
it is already raising consumer expectations, and funding provider expansion into a range
of product opportunities. Despite the threat of tighter regulation and more competition,
there is a requirement now for incumbents to take stock, consider their options, and
develop robust plans to respond.
Markus Ampenberger
Inderpreet Batra
Jean Clavel
Prateek Gupta
Kunal Jhanji
Sumit Kumar
Michael Marcus
Michael Zhang
About BCG
Boston Consulting Group partners with leaders in business and society to tackle their
most important challenges and capture their greatest opportunities. BCG was the
pioneer in business strategy when it was founded in 1963. Today, we help clients with
total transformation—inspiring complex change, enabling organizations to grow,
building competitive advantage, and driving bottom-line impact.
To succeed, organizations must blend digital and human capabilities. Our diverse,
global teams bring deep industry and functional expertise and a range of perspectives
to spark change. BCG delivers solutions through leading-edge management consulting
along with technology and design, corporate and digital ventures—and business
purpose. We work in a uniquely collaborative model across the firm and throughout
all levels of the client organization, generating results that allow our clients to thrive.