Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Police
Department
Anshika Chaudhary
Shubham Chaudhari
Table of Contents
01 02 03
BACKGROUND ER DIAGRAM MODELS & PROCESS
IT History Police Station RDBMS Component Model
Current Problems Questions Answered Key Processes
04 05 06
AHP PRIORITY ERP SOLUTION CLOSE
VECTOR
Objective Demonstration
ERP Parameters Timeline, Team & Budget On-site Interview
AHP Analysis Project Milestones Future Scope & Impact
Priority Matrix Change Management
Stakeholder Benefits
Overview
❖ Police Service maintains
public peace & order,
prevents crime, investigates,
and detects
❖ 14,000 Police Stations
❖ 16 lakh Police force strength
❖ 50 lakh cases registered per
year
IT History
Computerization in Police started in the mid-70s. Below diagram shows how IT
integration evolved for Police Department.
❖ Covered state & district ❖ Included FIR, police ❖ Mission Mode Project
headquarters registers etc. online under NeGP of GOI
❖ Faced Y2K problem ❖ Database of hardcore ❖ Rs. 2000 crores budget
❖ Crime & Criminal criminals, repeated ❖ Approved by CCEA on
database only offenders & gangs 19th June, 2009
EXISTING PROBLEMS
❖ No data connectivity between PS,
DCRB, SCRB & NCRB
❖ Data Entry was both in registers &
software
❖ Registers worn out easily & records
lost
❖ Lacked integrity of data as constables
could perform all duties relating to
various stages of the CIPA
Police
Department
RDBMS
Questions
Answered
Using
RDBMS
Component Model
Key Processes
AHP & Priority Vector
ERP Parameters
● Cost
● Time Vendor
● User Interface
● Data Security
● Simplicity
● Scalability Simplicity
● Vendor
● Technical Support
● Customizability
● Functionality Time
Cost
Anshika’s AHP Analysis
User Data Technical
Criteria Cost Time Interface Security Simplicity Scalability Vendor Support Customizability Functionality
Cost 1 3 2 0.2 1 1 3 2 3 1
Time 0.33 1 0.5 0.2 0.5 1 1 0.5 1 0.25
User Interface 0.5 2 1 0.2 1 2 2 3 2 1
Data Security 5 5 5 1 3 3 5 4 5 3
Simplicity 1 2 1 0.33 1 2 3 3 3 2
Scalability 1 1 0.5 0.33 0.5 1 3 1 2 0.5
Vendor 0.33 1 0.5 0.2 0.33 0.33 1 0.5 0.5 0.2
Technical
Support 0.5 2 0.33 0.25 0.33 1 2 1 0.5 0.25
Customizability 0.33 1 0.5 0.2 0.33 0.5 2 2 1 0.25
Functionality 1 4 1 0.33 0.5 2 5 4 4 1
Total 11 22 12.33 3.25 8.5 13.83 27 21 22 9.45
Shubham’s AHP Analysis
User Data Technical
Criteria Cost Time Interface Security Simplicity Scalability Vendor Support Customizability Functionality
Cost 1 3 2 0.2 4 4 3 4 3 0.25
Time 0.33 1 0.5 0.2 0.25 4 4 3 3 3
User Interface 0.5 2 1 0.2 4 3 3 4 3 0.1
Data Security 5 5 5 1 5 4 5 4 5 0.5
Simplicity 0.25 4 0.25 0.20 1 4 3 2 2 3
Scalability 0.25 0.25 0.33 0.25 0.25 1 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2
Vendor 0.33 0.25 0.33 0.2 0.33 2.00 1 0.5 0.5 0.5
Technical
Support 0.25 0.33 0.25 0.25 0.50 2.5 2 1 0.5 0.5
Customizability 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.2 0.50 3.33 2 2 1 0.25
Functionality 4 0.33 10 2.00 0.33 5 2 2 4 1
Total 12.25 16.5 20.00 4.70 16.17 32.83 25.5 22.9 22.3 9.3
Priority Matrix
Anshika Shubham
Observations
Cost 10.89% Cost 12.29% Minor difference because we are
Time 4.42% Time 10.38% two different individuals with our
User Interface 9.55% User Interface 10.31% own different past experiences,
Data Security 28.85% Data Security 22.54% understanding, values, and
Simplicity 12.30% Simplicity 11.19% thought process.
Scalability 7.13% Scalability 2.23%
Similarity because of our similar
Vendor 3.46% Vendor 3.20% deep understanding police
Technical Support 5.23% Technical Support 4.12% department which helped us
Customizability 4.94% Customizability 4.77% prioritize important parameters
Functionality 13.23% Functionality 18.98% like data security, functionality,
etc. for our organization.
100.00% 100.00%
Objectives of CCTNS
PROJECT TEAM
Centre: State:
Interview
police stations to understand the ground
reality.
❖ Fortunately, we could interview an IT
officer at Kalyanpur Police Station on 7th
Highlights
Nov, 2021.
❖ We discovered that he is a dedicated
personnel with a team to manage CCTNS
software.
❖ CCTNS was launched in the station
during 2016-17.
❖ His team had manually added the data
post 2000 in the software.
❖ The software runned on a secured network, but sometimes due to lack of
connectivity, data had to be stored offline in excel, which was later entered in
the software.
❖ CCTNS introduction did ease their lives a lot, as they no more had to flip through
thousands of registers. Officers seemed happy. :)
Police Portal
❖ General Diary
❖ Complaint
❖ Citizen Services
❖ 1000+ page
manual
Citizen Portal
❖ Complaint
❖ Verification
❖ Tenant verification
request
IMPACT & FUTURE SCOPE
● Investigation enhanced
● Centralized crime & criminal information repository
with criminal images & fingerprints
● Faster and easier access to crime and criminal
information across the country in a manner amenable
for trend and pattern analysis.
● Reduced workload
● Knowledge is shared across different regions & units
● Easy & low-cost scalability
● Passport verification time has been reduced
● Citizen can lodge a complaint online
● Multiple channels to access services from police
Thanks