Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Step 4 - Design An Information System
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Step 4 - Design An Information System
The activity starts on: Monday, May 10, The activity ends on: Sunday, May 23,
2021 2021
With this activity, you are expected to achieve the following learning
outcomes:
1. Apply the concepts of information system designs to meet requirements in
different contexts.
2. Design a solution based on the concepts of object-oriented designs, according to
the requirements previously established.
1
The activity consists of:
The system academic college has the following organizational structure:
The school has a systematization performed in EXCEL but wants to automate a little
better so it requires a group of engineers to perform the systematization of the school.
To do this, you have hired your small group in order to perform:
Based on data design, you must build:
1. Present the data design
2. Build the menu and context submenu to link the interfaces made.
3. Build dialog windows to respond to user activities
4. Conduct at least 3-page essay on color theory in information systems
2
2. The programming of the synchronous meeting (webconference) as an
explanation for the development of the activity and to give clarity to the doubts
presented.
In the Learning environment you must:
1. Review the syllabus of the academic year.
2. Review bibliographic contents and references.
3. Review and develop the activities proposed according to the curriculum.
In the Evaluation environment, you must:
Upload document must contain:
a) Cover
b) Introduction
c) Goals
d) Development of the proposed activity
e) Conclusions
f) Bibliography
The document must comply in its structure with APA standards.
It is very important to keep in mind that in the bibliography the indentation applied is
different from that of the paragraphs in the document.
3
2. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit
Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.
Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)
The academic penalties students will face are:
a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation,
the score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being
derived.
4
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score
obtained will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.
First evaluation High level: Follow guidelines applying written work delivery
criterion: rules, organized structure, document name, and document
delivery format.
Organization and
delivery of the If your work is at this level, you can get between 20 points
expected product. and 25 points
This criterion Medium Level: There are at most two (2) missing conditions in
represents 25 relation to guidelines applying written work delivery rules,
points out of the organized structure, document name, and document delivery
total of 125 format.
points of the If your work is at this level, you can get between 10 points
activity. and 19 points
Low level: Does not follow the proposed guidelines for the
delivery of the activity.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 9 points
Second evaluation High level: The rules are correctly applied in the document
criterion: If your work is at this level, you can get between 20
Correctly apply points and 25 points
APA standards in Medium Level: Partially applies the standards to the final
final document document
This criterion If your work is at this level, you can get between 10
represents 25 points and 19 points
5
points out of the Low level: Does not comply with apa standards.
total of 125 If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points of activity
points and 9 points