Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The researchers clearly The researchers clearly The researchers clearly The researchers
presented the following: presented only two (2) presented only one (1) of clearly failed to
the following: the following: present all of the
● The number of requirements of
respondents to be ● The number of ● The number of this section.
used in the study and respondents to be respondents to be
how did you come up used in the study and used in the study and
The Sample with such number how did you come up how did you come up
● Explained who are with such number with such number
these respondents ● Explained who are ● Explained who are
● Justification why are these respondents these respondents
the chosen ● Justification why are ● Justification why are
respondents would the chosen the chosen
best fit for the study respondents would respondents would
best fit for the study best fit for the study
The researchers clearly The researchers clearly The researchers clearly The researchers
presented the following: presented only one (2) of presented only one (1) of clearly failed to
the following: the following: present all of the
● Described that the
requirements of
instrument was either ● Described that the ● Described that the
researcher-made this section.
instrument was either instrument was either
adopted, or modified researcher-made researcher-made,
(citation needed). adopted, or modified adopted, or modified
The ● Discussed and justified (citation needed). (citation needed).
Instrument(s) the variables, ● Discussed and justified ● Discussed and justified
indicators, and the variables, the variables,
measurements used in indicators, and indicators, and
the instrument with measurements used in measurements used in
pertinent cited the instrument with the instrument with
literature. pertinent cited pertinent cited
● Discussed the strengths literature. literature.
and weaknesses of the ● Discussed the strengths ● Discussed the strengths
instrument. and weaknesses of the and weaknesses of the
instrument. instrument.
The researchers discussed The researchers discussed The researchers discussed The researcher
Data the detailed the the step-by-step process this section but the failed to state
Collection step-by-step process of of data collection but not detailed step-by-step the detailed
process and step-by-step
PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2
INQUIRIES, INVESTIGATIONS AND IMMERSIONS
data collection in a in a detailed chronological order of process of data
chronological way. chronological way. data collection in collection.
incoherent.
The researchers clearly The researchers discussed The researchers Data analysis is
discussed the process on the process on how the insufficiently discussed vaguely
Plan for Data
how the data are to be data are to be analyzed the process on how the explained.
Analysis
analyzed with pertinent without pertinent cited data are to be
cited literature. literature. analyzed.
The researchers clearly The researchers clearly The researchers vaguely The researchers
discussed the following: discussed only one (1) of presented the ethical failed to include
the following: consideration. this section in this
● Ethical standards chapter.
they are to uphold in ● Ethical standards
Ethical
the study they are to uphold in
Consideratio ● The “how” or good
the study
ns practices of the ● The “how” or good
group to ensure practices of the
ethical standards will group to ensure
be observed in the ethical standards will
study be observed in the
study
Submitted on time (based Research paper was Research paper was Research paper
Promptness/ on the given deadline). submitted next meeting submitted two days after was submitted
after the given deadline. set deadline. three days and
Timeliness beyond after set
deadline.
TOTAL POINTS/40
_____________________
Research Adviser