Professional Documents
Culture Documents
History, as you know, is as much a story of continuity as of change. Taking a long-term view of
the past and with the wisdom of hindsight, historians discover certain broad continuities for a
long stretch of time that distinguish it from the preceding and succeeding stretches when there
is a break in these continuities, i.e. when change occurs. In Indian history, three such major
periods are known as ancient, medieval, and modern periods. The transition from the ancient to
the medieval period in Indian history, the first subdivision of which is called ‘early medieval’, was
a long-drawn-out affair. This transition encompassed a series of significant changes over a wide
spectrum of human activity and thought. The term early medieval denotes an immediate period
between the ancient and the medieval. The early medieval period of Indian history may be seen
as a transitional period wherein changes in almost all institutions and spheres of society viz.
political, social, cultural as well as economy took place. In political sphere, due to the
continuation as well as acceleration of land grants, the emergence of petty landed estates, the
fragmentation or decentralization of political authority and the growth of lord-vassal relationship
may be noticed as emerging new trends. During the early medieval period, the horizontal and
vertical linkages of political power are more visible than ever before and the emergent political
elites can be connected with alliances with landed groups, some of them created and buttressed
by royal grants. In economic sphere, the decline of trade and commerce, decay of urban
centres, paucity and irregular slow circulation of metallic money, the growing agrarian character
of society and emergence of self-sufficient economy were the salient features of economy. In
social sphere, the modification of varṇ a system, proliferation of castes into hundreds of number
and their rigidity were the most striking developments of this period.
Among other developments, the growing regional identities in art, script, language and in
religious sphere the construction of temples, the theory of incarnation, visit to holy places,
concepts of pūjā, bhaktī and tantrā, etc. were significant developments.
Since the beginning of early medieval period, Indian subcontinent was marked with the feudal
establishments. Rise of caste proliferation, regional identity in art and culture were prominent.
The time bracket allotted to the early medieval period in India is between 600-1200 CEDuring
these centuries, kingdoms in both the north and south proliferated and regularly turned over.
Therefore, at any one time, India was fragmented by numerous regional kingdoms. As the rulers
of these warred and formed alliances, they employed the system of paramountcy and
subordination begun during the Gupta era, with some rulers being overlords and others vassals.
These rulers also demonstrated their power—and enhanced it—by patronizing Hindu institutions
and developing local traditions in the regions where their courts resided. They adopted titles
showing their devotion to the great Hindu deities, declared their intent to uphold dharma, built
fabulous Hindu temples in urban centers, and charged Brahmins with attending to them and
serving at their courts. One outstanding example of a feudal kingdom is the Chola Kingdom of
southern India.
In north India, the period c. 750 – 1200 CE can be further divided into two phases:
1. Phase Ⅰ (from c. 750 – 1000 CE) – This age in north India included three important empires,
the Gurjara Pratiharas in north India, the Palas in eastern India and the Rashtrakutas in the Deccan.
2. Phase Ⅱ (from c. 1000 – 1200 CE) – This phase is also known as the age of conflict. There was a
splitting of the tripartite powers into smaller kingdoms. The Gurjara Pratihara empire in north India
disintegrated into various Rajput states which were under the control of different Rajput dynasties like
Chahamanas (Chauhans), Paramaras of Malwa, Chandellas and so on. These Rajput states showed
resistance against the Turkish attacks (from north-west India) which were led by Mahmud Ghazni and
Mohammad Ghori in the 11th and 12th centuries.
In south India, the period from c. 850 – 1200 CE was ruled by the Cholas.
Sanskrit continued to be used as the language of the ruling class. Sanskrit was still
used at administrative levels though this language has become verbose and decorative.
In interior or tribal areas Aryan and pre-Aryan languages were used. But Brahmanas
forced various forms of Sanskrit onto the existing Aryan and pre-Aryan languages. This
Brahmanas who migrate from place to place systematized the local dialects into
languages. Writing and grammar based on Sanskrit was introduced into these languages.
By 7th century regional languages became much pronounced. And to decipher a single
During this period various cultural units like Andhra, Assam, Bengal, Gujarat,
During 6th century, Rajputs emerged with local tribes and absorption of Hunas and
other foreign elements into brahmanical society. This gave rise to the formation of Rajputana or
Rajasthan.
Bengal was divided into West Bengal (Gauda) and East Bengal (Vanga). Later whole
Hiuen-tsang also mentioned about the prevalence of various nationalities in Indian Sub-
1.LITERARY SOURCES
FOREIGNERS ACCOUNT
Apart from the indigenous texts, Chinese and Arab accounts are useful sources
of information for early medieval India. Foremost among the former are the
accounts of the monks Xuanzang (c. 600–64 CE) and Yijing (635–713 CE), both
of whom visited India. One of Yijing’s works gives an account of Buddhist
doctrines and practices in India, while the other provides brief biographical
sketches of 56 Chinese monks who visited India in the 7th century. The important
Arab works include the 9th–10th century writings of travellers and geographers
such as Sulaiman, Al-Masudi, Abu Zaid, Al-Biduri, and Ibn Haukal. Later Arab
writers include Al-Biruni, Al-Idrisi, Muhammad Ufi, and Ibn Batuta. Such accounts
are especially useful for information on trade.
2. ARCHAELOGICAL EVIDENCE
EPIGRAPHIC EVIDENCE
Inscriptions are the most important part of archeological sources. They can be
considered as the most authentic and reliable source. These are comparatively
less biased. Inscriptions in early India are of many kinds: royal edicts, votive
inscriptions recording gifts, brief biographical statements, eulogies of rulers,
records of particular events, legal documents pertaining to rights and obligations
over land, and such like. As with all categories of historical data, they reflect
historical change. The inscriptions were engraved in public spaces such as
temple walls, or else on copper plates. The copper plates became the property of
a family, passed down from one generation to the next. The inscriptions were
usually consulted by later authors and also picked up by the bards. The
inscriptions were meant for public consumption and hence were open to the
comments of the elite — the samantas, sreshthins, kayasthas, brahmanas etc.
The inscriptions begin with a prashasti which gives historical information about
the dynasty. It is in the form of a eulogy on the kings and their achievements.
Initially it is of the king but soon included his dynasty. When prasasti records the
change in the title of the king, then one can know that it marks a significant
political moment. Prashatis give information regarding the religious affiliation of
the king, updated version of dynastic history, important kings, ancestry and much
more.The incriptions tell us about the identity of the grantee, nature of the gift
whether it was a gift of revenue from land or land itself; the extent of the area that
was granted — it could be a small area or several villages; the religious affiliation
of the grantee — it could be a Buddhist matha as was the case earlier or
brahmanas. The inscriptions recording grants simply were not a new feature
marking the new transformations that the economy was undergoing, but they
record a shift from yajna to dana — from the sacrificial ritual to the gift — as
methods of legitimating the donor as the patron and the donee as the legitimizer.
With the pratice of land grants, brahmanas become owners of landed wealth and
hence powerful. The brahmana grantees settled on gifted land with the full
support of royalty. They introduced brahmanical traditions and fostered the
acceptance of kingship.
The official royal inscriptions (rajakiyam) included categories such as Sasanam
(instructions), jayapatram (legal decisions), ajnapatram (orders), and
prajnapanam (proclamations). The instructions were meant for future kings as
well which necessitated its keeping in the royal custody. Many inscriptions
carried the royal seal for authentication purposes. The inscriptions gave the
genealogy of the person issuing the statement, its purpose and a precise date.
The pre-Gupta inscriptions were in Prakrit but subsequently they were in
Sanskrit. Sanskrit became the common language in the post-gupta period. By the
second millennium CE, regional languages started getting used in inscriptions.
However the prashasti continued to be in Sanskrit. Sanskrit was widely used by
administrators, selective religious sects, philosophers and literateurs.
The early medieval inscriptions carry useful information on subjects which have
become central to the major debates concerning this period. Land grants, which
beame very prolific from the Gupta period onwards, are especially relevant for
the reconstruction of the eonomy, society, status of craftsmen and crafts, crops,
samantas, feudatories, kings and queens etc.
Royal inscriptions which are common in this period record not only information
related to governance but other aspects of life as well. A study of the inscriptions
of this period tell us about a number of points. The pre-Gupta inscriptions were
ususally of the grant of revenue from the land in lieu of salaries. But later the
grants of land came to be made in perpetuity and hence land itself came to be
claimed by the grantee. The brahmana donees became very wealthy and
powerful. They were mostly responsible for constructing inflated genealogies
through their familiarity with the vamsanucharita of the Puranas. The inscriptions
help us to reconstruct the process of gradual state formation in the early
medieval period.
COINS
Coins of early medieval India suggest that there was a fairly logical
reconstruction of the monetary systems. During the five centuries from AD 750 to
AD 1250, a few superficially uniform coin types comprised monetary systems
startling in their complexity and diversity. While some money forms remained
within their locality of issue, others passed far and wide. The physical evidence is
incontrovertible, that money and exchange were alive and vibrant throughout
much of the area. Further, it has also been established by historians that there
was some apparent shortages of the precious metals necessary for coinage in
early medieval India. Far from being an era of static decline, monetary history
reveals a time of sagacious and practical adjustments which maintained vigorous
metal-based monetary systems.
urther, it is quite suspected that in comparison to the earlier Gupta period and
later Sultanate period, there was a paucity or scarcity of coinage throughout
North India in the early medieval era. This is interpreted as indicating a general
low level of exchange transactions, and hence a quiescence of trade and
commerce. Gold coins were rarely issued after the fall of the Gupta Empireand
even the silver and copper coinages are scarce and poor. Interpretation of the
early medieval propensity for alloy coins is based on the actual pattern of
coinage use. Until the end of the Gupta period, rulers took an active interest in
the forms of their coinage, causing a great variety of coin types to be issued, all
differentiable as to issuing state, king, legend, artistic design and sometimes
even year of issue. This is reflected in numismatic literature, and museum
catalogues, by the amount of attention devoted to these coins. When, as in the
period AD 500 to AD 1000, coins ceased to be used as a message-bearing
medium, a conservative retention of old coin-styles became the rule in North
India. Specific series, notably the Indo-Sassanian and bull-and-horseman types,
were issued by a number of dynasties with virtually no distinguishing marks to
indicate the place of issue, issuing authority or date of manufacture. Only a
barely perceptible evolution of style over the centuries is notable.
Historians clarify that there is a definite paucity of coin types in this period, but
this is not evidence of a scarcity of circulating medium. So far, in the literature,
there has been no assessment, rigorous or otherwise, of the numbers of coins
originally produced and circulated. When reference is made to coin hoards of the
early medieval period, rather than museum holdings, quite different conclusions
are drawn about the abundance of coinage in the early medieval period. The
northern portion of the subcontinent in the period AD 800 to AD 1200 contained a
number of distinct currency zones or spheres. Within each zone, a single coinage
form prevailed, and there was little overlap in areas of circulation of the major
currencies. Two distinct distribution patterns of coins existed - some currency
spheres were congruent with political boundaries, while other currency spheres
seemed to have been unconstrained by political frontiers. It is remarked that only
the coin forms of the latter show consistency of intrinsic value over time. While
the regulation of manufacture and resultant control over the physical nature of
the circulating medium remained a powerful privilege of government, the
acceptableness of the circulating medium was subject to the influences and
preferences of trading communities.
Monumental evidence
Monuments are one of the most important elements of archeological sources.
The study of these monuments not only helps us to interpret about the technical
skills, living standard, economic condition of the time but also help us to know
about the architectural style of the time.
We have evidence of construction of massive monuments in the form of temple
architecture and new capital cites by the kings to commemorate their victory of
other kings or dynasties or neighbouring regions. For example:- The Chola king
Rajendra I ,to commemorate victories over Mahendra V the ruler of Sri Lanka
and against the Pandyas,the Chalukyas and the ruler of Kerala, built a new
capital at Gangaikondacholapuram. The Virupaksha temple at Pattadakal,
Karnataka was constructed at the behest of queen Lokamahadevi to
commemorate the conquest of Kanchipuram by her husband king Vikramaditya
II.
CONCLUSION
The period between AD 750–AD 1200 is no more treated as a ‘dark phase’ of
Indian history. It was marked by various political, social and cultural activities.
Politically, the period between AD 750–AD 1200 is early Medieval period with the
rise of numerous regional states. In North India Gurjara- Prathiharas, Palas in
east & Rashtrakutes in South India rose to power in early years (750–1000) while
in later years (1000–1200) Rajput states in North & Cholas in South fetched
power from previous rulers. The nature of state is a decentralized political system
wherein the king at the top is assisted by small chiefs or Samanthas. Land grants
become very common to religious people & to state officials in lieu of salary.
Sabha (Brahaman predominant village), Ur (non brahaminical settlements) were
local administering authorities in South India. It is a period of economic decline
due to diminishing overseas trade. During this period several tribes gave up
hunting, start tilling lands, and subsequently included into brah- manical society.
This period is of robust cultural development. Regional languages & Regional
literature developed around this time.Nagara, Dravida & Vesara style of temple
architecture evolved during this period. Cultural contacts with South east Asia
(Java, Sematra, Malay, Cambodia, Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia), though
developed on settlting of Indian traders on these regions.