Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jasmine Bell
Dr. Morgan
LEAD CTW1A
Lens Analysis Essay
Nov 12, 2021
Within Bryan Stevenson's book Just Mercy, a masterful depiction of the wrongs
perpetrated in the criminal justice system, the audience is made aware of how debilitating our
system of fairness is to marginalized groups. Stevenson uses small anecdotes to enumerate the
dehumanizing actions that have been normalized and further draw on the audience's empathy by
Baldwin details the reality of being a Black man in the world through the story of his brother's
life. His words leave the reader with no imaginative ideas but realistic expectations and how to
Walter's conviction and unequal treatment is akin to Baldwin's account of living in the United
States while Black in "A Letter to My Nephew" in how they indirectly invoke the reader to act.
Both Stevenson and Baldwin exhibits nuance through the use of subtlety; asking the audience
what they wish to do rather than stating what they need to do.
Despite Stevenson and Baldwin speaking on separate realities, with different grievances
burdened, the problem they are addressing is the same. Black people are not given the right to
equality, nor are they given recognition for the torment they have endured. As seen in Chapter 7
of Just Mercy, Stevenson actively fights against Walter's conviction, noting the faulty
testimonies, statements, and apparent racial bias presented by the "impartial" court. Being Black
himself puts him into a dangerous situation with limited options, Ralph Myers saying " You
2
know they'll try to kill you if you get to the bottom of everything". Despite being Walter's lawyer
Stevenson is also treated like a convicted individual. Having the reader witnesses an officer of
the legal system have his rights disregarded as if worthless further establishes empathy and anger
On the opposing hand, Baldwin addresses his nephew James, although the use of his
nephew's name is sparse, allowing his work to be applied to oppressed people, specifically Black
youth. Baldwin explains the trials he and his family have faced, and acknowledges the fact
people and the systems in place refuse to recognize said trials. Baldwin states, " this is the crime
of which I accuse my country and my countrymen and for which neither I nor time nor history
will ever forgive them, that they have destroyed and are destroying hundreds of thousands of
lives and do not know it and do not want to know it". Baldwin lets the reader feel the blatant
disregard of black people's trauma, pain, and their truth. With the lack of recognition, you're not
allowed to complain, to educate others of your experiences, and to seek refuge and relief. You're
stuck in this limbo of living in a constant struggle met with continuous dismissal to have a
conversation of the past, present, and future of the treatment of marginalized groups.
What both authors excel in is the graphic detail in which they describe the tiresome trials
Black people have been forced to face and adapt to. With Walter's poorly formed case against
him to Baldwin's brother barely making it through life, the reader is not told to exhibit sadness
and anger on behalf of the people described, they come to that conclusion due to the descriptions
alone. Stevenson and Balwin don't incentivize the audience to act and create the change they
long for in their writing, they are not telling people to raise their voices and pitchforks against the
3
oppression they describe in their articles of work, they are posing an unspoken question. The two
authors are asking, " After truly seeing what you know to be true, what do you want to do about
it?". There's no expectation of " what are you going to do about the issue at hand"; both authors
use their stories and pains to greatly express the absence of change to the audience, allowing for
them to picture the current situation in real-time and have the realization that they can play a role
Stevenson and Baldwin's wielding of their words is brilliant, there's no over usage of their
credibility as educated, notable Black individuals to have the reader adhere to their words and
vision. Their skillful humane approach appeals to almost all audiences, despite the focus on
racial inequality and the differentiation in treatment, because they communicate on the barest
level possible: as a living being. The tiresome troubles explained leave the reader bare, defined
only by their wishes and wants for people, which leaves them itching to act solely of their own
volition.