CM&CD Works On Canals and Design of Lift Irrigation Schemes

CM&CD works on Canals and Design of Lift
Irrigation Schemes
Dr I Satyanarayana Raju, MTech,MBA,MPhil,BL,FIE,PhD.,

Former Chief Engineer,CDO(AP) Hyderabad &
Member, Technical Advisory Council,WRD(AP)&
Expert-Dam Safety Inspection Team &
Past Chairman,IEI-Telangana State Centre & AP State Centre,
Hyderabad-500082(TS).
Contact:9676686158;indukuriraju8@gmail.com
Canals And Cross Masonry and Cross Drainage Works(CM&CD)
INTRODUCTION TO CANAL ALIGNMENT
&
HYDRAULIC PARTICULARS
 IRRIGATION
The process of supplementing the supplies of rain water on the area
to be cultivated at the season to the extent required for the
successful cultivation of the Crop.
 Process of Irrigation comprises of
a) Source of Water
b) Carrier System to transport water from the source to the place of
cultivable lands.
 Efficiency of Irrigation mainly depends upon the
1) Effective functioning of the Carrier System &
2) Efficient Controlling.
 The distribution system which conveys water from the head works to
the land to be irrigated is called CANAL SYSTEM.
 The canal system is a vital element for the success of an
IRRIGATION PROJECT.
3
CARRIER SYSTEM
CANALS CANAL STRUCTURE
Main Branch Major Minor Field Cross Drainage Cross Masonry

Works Works
Contour Canal Ridge Canal Side Slope Canal

for Main Canals for Branch, Dist
& Field
Channels
4
CANALS
MAJOR MINOR
MAIN CANAL BRANCH CANAL
DISTRIBUTORY DISTRIBUTORY
FIELD CHANNEL
OFF TAKE TAKING

OFF TAKE FROM
TAKES OFF OFF TAKE FROM OFF FROM A PIPE OFF TAKE
MAIN / BRANCH
DIRECTLY FROM MAIN CANAL MAJOR SERVING LESS
CANAL
THE U/S SIDE OF DISTRIBUTORY THAN 40.47
Q = 14.15 to
WEIR HEAD WORKS Q > 14.15 Cumecs SERVING > 40.47 Hectares of Ayacut
0.028 Cumecs
OR DAM (500 c/s ) Hectares (100 Acres)
( 500 to 1 c/s )
(100 Acres)
5
CANAL STRUCTURES
CROSS DRAINAGE WORKS CROSS MASONRY WORKS
CROSS DRAINAGE WORKS
AQUEDUCT/UT/VIADUCT SP SYPHON LEVEL CROSSING INLET & OUTLET
DRAINAGE SYPHON CANAL SYPHON
CROSS MASONRY WORKS
REGULATION & CONTROL WORKS COMMUNICATION WORKS
Head Regulator Cross Regulator Drops Bridges, Roads & Foot Bridges for
Escapes Measuring Devices OT Sluices
Railways Men & Cattle
CROSS DRAINAGE WORKS
To Pass Irrigation Canal Over the To Pass Drain Over the Irrigation Canal
By means of SP/ Canal Syphon To Pass Drain through Irrigation Canal
Drainage by means of Aqueduct/ UT/
By means of Inlet & Outlet/ Level
Viaduct / Syphon Aqueduct
Crossing
6
Types of CM& CD Works
Types:
• 1. Falls: Vertical Fall, Sarda type fall and straight glacis fall.
• 2. Regulators: Head and cross regulators; design principles
• 3. Cross-drainage works: Aqueduct, Syphon aqueduct, and Super passage.
• 4. Outlets: Types Viz., proportionality, sensitivity and flexibility
Canal regulation works:

Any structure constructed to regulate the discharge, full supply level or
velocity in a canal is known as regulation works.
Works constructed with this aim are categorized as follows.
i) Canal falls;
ii) Head regulation or head sluice;
iii) Cross regulation;
iv) Canal escape;
v) Canal outlets.
REGULATORS-HEAD AND CROSS REGULATORS-
DESIGN PRINCIPLES.
Regulators are structures constructed across the canals to
control the flow in the canal.
There are two types of regulators:
i. Head regulator or distributing head regulator
ii. Cross regulator
Functions of head and cross regulator:

When a branch canal takers off from the main canal (also
called parent canal), the head regulator is placed across the
branch to control the supply of water into the branch canal.
The branch canal is also called as off taking canal.
The cross regulator is also placed across the main canal,
D/S of the branch canal, to control the flow in the main
canal.
Design principles of head regulator and cross regulator
Crest level
• For cross regulator- crest level is same as upstream bed level of anal
• For head regulator- crest level is kept 0.3-1m higher than the crest level of the cross regulator
Waterway: The discharge equation for drowned weir is used to find waterway
• Q =Q1+Q2= 2/3
• Where,Cd1 =0.577; Cd2= 0.80
• B= clear water way required
• h = difference of water levels U/S & D/S of crest
• D/S water level in the channel above the crest= head due to velocity of approach, which is
small and often ignored.
• conditions of flow for design
• The design is made for the worst of the following two conditions
• Full supply discharge is passing down both the channels with all gates of cross and head
regulator open
• The discharge in the parent channel is low but the off take channel is running at full with fully
supply level main maintained in branch channel
• Quite often the 1st condition governs the design.
• D/S floor level or cistern level
• Level of D/S floor = D/s FSL- Ef2 , taking hv=0
• Where,Ef2 = specific energy in the D/S of the section
• Ef2 ..is formed from the hydraulic jump equation
• length of D/s floor: generally it is = 5(y2-y1) where y1 and y2 are depths before
and after jump also it is governed by the safe exit gradient allowable for the site
conditions
• cut-offs
• Depth of U/S cutoff =Yu/3+0.6, where Yu = upstream water depth in canal
• Depth of D/S cutoff = Yd/3+0.6, where Yd = downstream water depth in canal
• total floor length: based on exit gradient consideration.
• uplift pressures and floor thickness: based on khoslas theory
• on U/S side: minimum thickness of 0.3-0.5 m is provided
• protection works: based on scour depth,
D which is Yu/3+0.6 on upstream side and Yd/3+0.6 on downstream side
• Cement concrete blocks are provided for length of 1.5 D on U/S & D/S side
• Quantity of slope =2.25D m3/m length.
Cross-Drainage work
(Aqueduct, Syphon aqueduct and Super passage)
• A cross drainage work is a structure constructed at the crossing of a canal and
a natural drain such that there is no interruption to the flow in the canal
when the drain receives water, due to rain fall or otherwise in the catchment.
The drainage water (of the drain) can be disposed of in one of the following
ways
• By passing the canal over the drainage through an aqueduct or siphon
aqueduct.
• By passing the canal below the drainage through a super passage or a canal
siphon
• By letting the drain water into the canal and then disposing it off through a
level crossing or inlets & outlets.
• Aqueduct: In this structure, the canal bed is above the highest flood level
(HFL) of the drain. Flow in the drain is at atm. Pressure.
• Syphon aqueduct: The drain bed is depressed and provided with a pucca
floor. The HFL of drain is above the bottom level of canal bed and as such flow
in the drain is under pressure and not at atmospheric pressure
Super passage and Canal Syphon.
Super Passage,Canal Syphon,& Inlet-outlets
• Super passage: the canal full supply level (FSL) is much below the bottom level of the drain.
Flow in canal is by gravity and water surface everywhere is exposed to atmosphere.
• Canal siphon: The bed of the canal is lowest and flow in canal is under pressure. The FSL of
the canal (on the u/s side) is above the bed level of drain. Thus flow in canal is syphonic in
action.
• Level crossing: A level crossing is a cross drainage structure constructed when the canal and
drain flows meet at the same level. (see fig.) Cross regulators across drain and canal
(outgoing) are required to control the flows in drain and canal respectively. Sometimes a
regulator across incoming canal is also provided.
These structures become necessary where high discharge is carried by canal and
intermittent floods of high magnitude occur in the drain and when they meet at the same
level.
• Inlets and outlets:
• An inlet is a structure constructed across the drain and the drain water is admitted into the
canal to augment canal discharge. It is done when drain discharge is small and canal water
level is maintained close to FSL or slightly higher. It is also necessary that too much silt does
not enter the canal through the drain discharge.If the drain discharge is high, then an outlet
may also be constructed d/s of function to dispose of the drain flood
General Design considerations for cross drainage works
• Max-Flood discharge of drain: Arrived at by empirical/rational
formula for small drains; and by hydrograph analysis for large
grains.
• Waterway required for aqueducts and siphon aqueducts:
Waterway of drain (P) = 4.75 (Laceys’s equations). Effective clear
waterway will be less then P due to the thickness of pipes. It
should not be less than 0.8P.
• Size of barrel: highest level of drain barrel: In case of aqueduct,
the HFL of drain is much below the bottom level of canal tough. In
Siphon aqueduct it depends on the velocity allowable in barrel,
which is of the order of 2-3 m/s.
• Afflux and Head loss through siphon barrels: Due to the reduction
in the width of the drain, afflux occurs or the u/s side of drain
barrel.
• The head loss through siphon barrel is found from Unwin’s formula. It is
also known as afflux.
• R=(1+f1+f2+L/R)V2/2g-Va2/2g
Where
• L = length of barrel
• R = Hyd. Mean Radius of barrel
• V = Velocity of flow through barrel
• Velocity of approach (negligible)
• f1 = Coefficient of head loss at entry = 0.505 for unshaped entry;
• = 0.08 for belt mouth entry
• f2 = Coefficient of function such that head loss through barrel due to
surface functions is given by formula f2*L*V2/2gR;
• =a(1+b/R)
• Value of a,b are given in Table in next slide.
• Taking D/s HFL of Drain same;
• U/s HFL=D/s HFL+h
Material a b
Smooth iron pipe 0.00497 0.025
Smooth pipe 0.00996 0.025
Ashlar or Brickwork 0.00316 0.030
Rubble Masonry/Stone 0.0057 0.250
pitching
Canal outlet:
• A canal outlet is a small structure, which admits water to a field channel (water course) from
a distributing (branch) canal. It is used to deliver the required water into the field channel,
which is turn, is used to irrigate the land under its command. Field channel is maintained by
the farmer.
• Outlets are classified under three hands:
• Non-modular outlet: A non modular outlet is the one in which the discharge (let out into the
field channel) is based on the difference in water levels in the distributary and the field
channel. E.g. submerged pipe outlet, masonry sluices and orifices, wooden shoots.
• Semi-module or flexible outlet:
• In this type, the discharge is affected by the water level in the distributary only. Fluctuations
in the water level of the field channel do not affect the discharge.
• E.g.: Kennedy’s gauge outlet crump’s open flume outlet, pipe – cum-open flume outlet.
• Rigid module: In this type, constant discharge is admitted to field channel even when there
are fluctuations in water levels of both distributary and field channel. E.g. Gibbs Module
Parameters for judging the function of outlet are:

• i) Flexibility ii) Proportionality iii) setting iv) sensitivity v) Hyper proportional outlet vi) sub
proportional outlet vii) Efficiency viii) Drawing ratio ix) Minimum modular head x) Modular
limits and modular range.
Objectives of LI Schemes
Lifting of flood water to upland areas can be done by:
 Supplying water to needy regions located far off from source.
 Feeding tanks enroute to combine with self yield with no cost for
separate canal system and for future needs.
 Effective usage of water stored in balancing reservoirs and also
catering Drinking water needs with intermittent pumping.
 Optimum utilization of water by supplying with just designed
quantity.
 Interlinking of rivers can be possible inspite difference in river
altitudes unlike conventional gravity system..
 Transfer of surplus flood water from reservoirs to the required
regions.
6 October 2017 IEI, HYDERABAD 29

Limitations of L.I. Scheme
 They are costly with respect to benefit cost ratio compared to

other Gravity schemes
 Require assured un-interrupted power supply
 Require assured flows in the source
 Recurring cost of power bills
 Regular maintenance is required for civil as well as mechanical
works.
 Any problem in pipes or pumps lead to grinding halt to the system
 Life of L.I. scheme is shorter than dams & barrages
 Needs periodical replacement of mechanical & electrical
components
 Needs regular maintenance of approach canals with river as
source against siltation

AYACUT DETAILS UNDER LARGE L.I.SCHEMES IN
Cobined A.P.
• PUSHKARA L.I.S. - 1,85,906 Ac

• TADIPUDI L.I.S. - 68,600 Ac
• H.N.S.S. L.I.S. - 6,21,000 Ac
• PATTISEEMA LIS-(supplementation) - 13,00,000 Ac.(KDS).
• PURUSHOTHAPATNAM LIS(“ ) - 5,00,000 Ac.
(Yeleru,North Coast).
• CHINTALAPUDI LIS-I&II (NSP+WGD)-5,00,000 Ac.
6 October 2017 IEI, HYDERABAD

WALAMTARI, HYDERABAD 31
31
PLANNING AND DESIGN OF LIFT IRRIGATION SCHEMES
Available Literature
• There is no specific literature available for Planning & design of
LIS
• Guide lines are there for arriving sump dimensions only
• Manuals & Codes are available for Pipe Design.
• Pumps, Motors govern by International Codes, manufactures
specification etc..
Non-Availability
• Provisions required for Pump house planning(except guide lines
by Organisations)
• Specific Limitations as well as applications of pumps
• Impact of Design parameters on performance of scheme
• Impact of site conditions on design parameters
• Optimization of scheme for economical considerations as well as
efficient functioning

Types Of Pump Houses
Pump Houses types based on type of pumps are :
1) Wet Pit Pump House / Pumps
• Access to pump is not possible
• Substructure will be always with water for full area
2) Dry Pit Pump House / Pumps
• Access to all components of pump is possible
• Substructure will be always without water and in dry
condition
• In view of the dry condition with access to every
component is possible, making maintenance is easy

VARIOUS COMPONENTS OF LI SCHEMES
I) Civil Structure & Associated components /

provisions
II ) Electro-Mechanical and
III) Hydro-Mechanical

I) Civil Structure &
Associated components / CRANE GIRDER
SLAB S2
V
9250
BEAM B6
V
BEAM B7
+ 356.75
20 t E.O.T. CRANE
provisions
BEAM B5 + 353.75 V
MANUALLY OPERATED V
225 Th BRICK WALL
CRANE ( 3 t CAPACITY )
+ 351.50 REFLUX VALVE 4000 Ø MANIFOLD
( TENTATIVE )
SLUICE VALVE
+ 349.00
W 1300 Ø DELIVERY PIPE + 348.15
SLAB S1
+ 346.50 + 347.00 + 346.50
TRASHRACK GROOVE BEAM B2 BEAM B1
Approach Canal on U/S of Pump

BEAM B4 2500 SUPPORTING PEDASTAL
4500 3500 2000 1500 TO PIPE LINE
LWL + 342.50 1000 Th PIER + 343.00
CBL + 340.50 150 Th C.C. IN M15 GRADE BEAM B3 1000 Th R.C.C. STEINING WALL
STOPLOG GROOVE
+ 338.00
250 Th C.C. IN M10 GRADE + 338.50
+ 337.50
1000 Th R.C.C. RAFT
500 13500
house
IRREGULARITIES IN FOUNDATION TO BE
FILLED WITH C.C. M20 GRADE WITH MSA 40
CROSS SECTIONAL ELEVATION OF JACKWELL CUM PUMP HOUSE

( SECTION 1 - 1 )
Intake/Sump/Forebay/Surge pool
2
Sub structure / sump
9250
C1 W C1
+ 346.50
C3 C3
+ 346.50
5000
+ 347.00
W RS1
REPAIR BAY
26000 5000
+ 347.00 C1 1000 Th STEINING C1
Super structure to accommodate

500 3000
+ 338.50
+ 338.00
BEAM B1
W
500
Th + 346.50
500 C1 BEAM B2 C1
4000
+ 338.00
TRASHRACK GROOVE W 1300 Ø DELIVERY PIPE
REFLUX VALVE
Pumps & Motors 1 C1 1000 Th PIER C1

SLUICE VALVE
4000 Ø MANIFOLD
2.0 m WIDE
SILT TRAP
6 x 4.00 + 5 x 1.00 = 29.00 m
+ 338.50
W
BEAM B1
2500
10000
5000
FLOW APPROACH BED C1 BEAM B2 C1
LEVEL + 340.50
Balancing Reservoirs / tanks
4000
+ 338.00
W
STOPLOG GROOVE
C1 1000 Th PIER C1 + 346.50

3
+ 338.50
+ 347.00
+ 338.00
W 1300 Ø DELIVERY PIPE
Delivery Cistern
C1 1000 Th PIER C1
5500
1000
+ 338.50
+ 347.00
+ 338.00
4000
3 C1 C3 C3 C1
+ 375.00
10000
4750
W
Gravity Canal with CM & CD

CONTROL PANEL
+ 346.50 C2 C2
+ 346.50
+ 347.00
4750
W
C3 C3
C2 RS2 C2
2
works on delivery side IEI, HYDERABAD
6 October 2017
PLAN OF THE JACKWELL CUM PUMP HOUSE
35
II) Electro
Mechanical 9250
SLAB S2 BEAM B6 BEAM B7
Pumps & Motors

+ 356.75
V V
CRANE GIRDER 20 t E.O.T. CRANE
BEAM B5 + 353.75 V
MANUALLY OPERATED V
225 Th BRICK WALL
( TENTATIVE )
SLUICE VALVE
Control Panels
+ 349.00
SLAB S1
+ 346.50 + 347.00 + 346.50

4500 3500 2000 1500 TO PIPE LINE
LWL + 342.50 1000 Th PIER + 343.00
STOPLOG GROOVE
SCADA
+ 338.00
250 Th C.C. IN M10 GRADE + 338.50
+ 337.50
1000 Th R.C.C. RAFT
500 13500
Dewatering Pumps
( SECTION 1 - 1 )
Fire water Pumps
2
9250
C1 W C1
+ 346.50
C3 C3
EOT crane for

+ 346.50
5000
+ 347.00
W RS1
REPAIR BAY
26000 5000
+ 347.00 C1 1000 Th STEINING C1
500 3000
+ 338.50
+ 338.00
BEAM B1
W
Pumps
500
Th + 346.50
500 C1 BEAM B2 C1
4000
+ 338.00
REFLUX VALVE
HOPDV / NRV /
C1 1000 Th PIER C1
1 SLUICE VALVE
4000 Ø MANIFOLD
2.0 m WIDE
SILT TRAP
6 x 4.00 + 5 x 1.00 = 29.00 m
+ 338.50
W
BEAM B1
2500
10000
5000
LEVEL + 340.50
4000
EOPDV etc within
+ 338.00
W
STOPLOG GROOVE
C1 1000 Th PIER C1 + 346.50

3
+ 338.50
+ 347.00
+ 338.00
pump house C1 1000 Th PIER C1
0
550
1000
+ 338.50
+ 347.00
+ 338.00
4000
3
Transformers & Sub

+ 375.00 C1 C3 C3 C1
10000
4750
W
CONTROL PANEL
+ 346.50 C2 C2
+ 346.50
+ 347.00
4750
W
station C2
C3
RS2
C3
C2
2
III) Hydro – Mechanical
Pressure mains with design dia SLAB S2
9250
BEAM B6
V
BEAM B7
+ 356.75
V
and thickness
BEAM B5 + 353.75 V
MANUALLY OPERATED V
225 Th BRICK WALL
( TENTATIVE )
SLUICE VALVE
+ 349.00
SLAB S1
+ 346.50 + 347.00 + 346.50
Surge Protection Devices

4500 3500 2000 1500 TO PIPE LINE
LWL + 342.50 1000 Th PIER + 343.00
STOPLOG GROOVE
+ 338.00
250 Th C.C. IN M10 GRADE + 338.50
+ 337.50
1000 Th R.C.C. RAFT
500 13500
 Valves such as air valves at


( SECTION 1 - 1 )
regular intervals
2
Stoplogs & trashracks
9250
C1 W C1
+ 346.50
C3 C3
+ 346.50
5000
+ 347.00
W RS1
REPAIR BAY
26000 5000
+ 347.00 C1 1000 Th STEINING C1
Manifold connecting
500 3000
+ 338.50
+ 338.00
BEAM B1
W
500
Th + 346.50
500 C1 BEAM B2 C1
4000
+ 338.00
delivery pipes of pumps and 1 C1 1000 Th PIER C1

REFLUX VALVE
SLUICE VALVE
4000 Ø MANIFOLD
2.0 m WIDE
SILT TRAP
6 x 4.00 + 5 x 1.00 = 29.00 m
+ 338.50
W
BEAM B1
2500
10000
5000
pressure mains
LEVEL + 340.50
4000
+ 338.00
W
STOPLOG GROOVE
C1 1000 Th PIER C1 + 346.50

3
+ 338.50
+ 347.00
+ 338.00
Semi Portal crane for
C1 1000 Th PIER C1
0
550
1000
+ 338.50
+ 347.00
+ 338.00
4000
3 C1 C3 C3 C1
+ 375.00
Stoplogs & Trash racks

10000
4750
W
CONTROL PANEL
+ 346.50 C2 C2
+ 346.50
+ 347.00
4750
W
C3 C3
C2 RS2 C2
2
Planning & Design Of LIS Comprises
1. Hydrology
2. Finalisation of Alignment
- Length of Gravity Canals
- Length of Pressuremains
- Number of Lifts
- Balancing Reservoirs Utilization/Introduction
- Pump Houses Location
3. Hydraulic Particulars
- Discharge
- Pumping Head
4. Design of Pumps
- Type of Pumps
- Number of Pumps
- Capacity of Pumps Cont..
5. Design of Pump House
- Approach Canal / Tunnel
- Intake / sump / Forebay
- Sub Structure
- Super Structure
6. Design of Pressure mains
- Type / Material
- Diameter of Pipes and
- Number of rows
- Pipe Laying & Compaction of refill
- Surge Analysis And Protection System
- CM & CD Works for Pipe crossings
7. Delivery Cistern / Out fall structure
8. SCADA
6 October 20179. Canal networking system
IEI, HYDERABAD 39
1)
HYDROLOGY
Water Required to be assessed based on
- Ayacut to be served
- Type of Crops
- Quantity of water
- Period of operation
Water Availability at source
- Net Quantity
- Period / Duration
The water requirement shall match with the water
available at the source duly considering the allocated or under
utilization quantity for the already existing needs, if any.
2) ALIGNMENT
Alignment freezing comprises finalisation of :

- Number of Lifts / Pump houses
- Approach and Gravity canal lengths
- Length of Pressure mains
- Fixing of Pump house location in the
foreshore of river / reservoir
- Utilization / Introduction of Balancing
reservoirs enroute the alignment

Number of Lifts / Pump houses
Number of lifts / pump houses is dependent on :
 Length of the alignment
 Total Pumping head required
 Presence of ayacut enroute the alignment
 Capacity and type of proposed pumps
+60.60
+ 46.25
Delivery III
+41.30 FSL +40.00 LWL + 38.795
CBL +38.53
+ 22.60 Delivery II
FSL +18.00M
LWL + 16.715
+16.00M CBL +15.00M
Delivery I LIFT III
LIFT II
+37.00
Pressure mains
+22.80
M.F.L +20.80 +22.80 FSL +18.00M
+16.00M CBL +15.00M
RIVER
AVG.G.L +18.00 +18.45 +18.80
Avg. G.L
+14.00 Bank Delivery I
LWL + 13.50 No. Disch LWL Platform Delivery Intake/Gravity Length Pipe Length
+8.00
+6.50 +8.00 BED LEVEL OF Lift I 6.56 cumecs + 13.00m + 22.80m + 23.60m 20.00m 200.0m
JACKWELL Lift II 6.56 cumecs + 16.715m + 22.60m + 41.30m 4540.0m 1350.0m
+2.75
+2.30 C.C M20 Lift III 6.06 cumecs + 38.795m + 46.25m + 60.60m 4080.0m 525.0m
GRADE
-1.00
- 3.0
LIFT I Fig 1 SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM SHOWING 3 - LIFTS OF CHAGALNADU L.I. SCHEME
Approach Canal and
Gravity Canal
 Shorter length of Approach canal
 Off take point shall not be silt
accumulation region as it is the
gate way of the LIS
 Reverse slope may be provided
in river intake
 Approach Capacity 50% more
than required for river intake
 Greater length of gravity canals
on delivery side shall be
explored minimizing pipe length
to achieve economy.
Length of Pressure mains
• Shorter length of Pressure main shall be provided
since length has compounding impact on cost of the
scheme as lengthy pipe results increases in:
•- Pumping head there by pump capacity
•- Pipe thickness
•- Surge protection devices
•- and capital cost

Fixing of Pump House
Location
Pump house location shall be
located such a way that it needs :
 Smaller length of approach
canal
 Smaller length of approach
bridge from TBL
+60.60
+ 46.25
Delivery III
+41.30 FSL +40.00 LWL + 38.795
CBL +38.53
+ 22.60 Delivery II
FSL +18.00M
LWL + 16.715
+16.00M CBL +15.00M
Delivery I LIFT III
LIFT II
+37.00
Pressure mains
+22.80
M.F.L +20.80 +22.80 FSL +18.00M
+16.00M CBL +15.00M
RIVER
AVG.G.L +18.00 +18.45 +18.80
Avg. G.L
+14.00 Bank Delivery I
LWL + 13.50 No. Disch LWL Platform Delivery Intake/Gravity Length Pipe Length
+8.00
+6.50 +8.00 BED LEVEL OF Lift I 6.56 cumecs + 13.00m + 22.80m + 23.60m 20.00m 200.0m
JACKWELL Lift II 6.56 cumecs + 16.715m + 22.60m + 41.30m 4540.0m 1350.0m
+2.75
+2.30 C.C M20 Lift III 6.06 cumecs + 38.795m + 46.25m + 60.60m 4080.0m 525.0m
GRADE
-1.00
- 3.0
LIFT I Fig 1 SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM SHOWING 3 - LIFTS OF CHAGALNADU L.I. SCHEME
Utilization of Tanks / Balancing Reservoirs
• Presence of intermediate tanks

or BRs in the alignment
makes scheme economical
as well as efficient because :
Design discharge of pumps can be reduced without

impact on crop water requirement which results in
reduction of pump capacity, pipe dia and canal sizes
Flood waters can be stored in the balancing
reservoirs for future needs
Better Synchronization of lifts is possible in
6 Octobermultiple
2017 stages of lifts
IEI, HYDERABAD 46
HYDRAULIC PARTICULARS
Discharge w.r.t.
 Total quantity ( TMC or Mcft ) required to be lifted
 Specified operation period / water availability period
 Discharge at PH’s considering water requirement enroute
the alignment.
 Pumping Hours
Pumping Head w.r.t.
 LWL of sumps and Delivery level of out fall / tanks
 HPs of approach & gravity canals and pipe alignment.
 Pressure mains length
Design Discharge
Total quantity of water to be pumped in the specified
period shall be arrived based on :
1. Crop water requirement
For Peak demand of crop period when no intermediate
tanks are present or for single pumping only
Mean Average demand of crop period with tank and for
multiple pumping stations
2. Seepage & Evaporation Losses
3. Drinking water requirement
4. Pumping hours ( Shall be for 24 hrs except for special
considerations in view of the dedicated power lines )
 Design discharge shall be computed from the above
total quantity to be pumped in required no. of days with
specified no. of pumping hours ( since Pumping hours has
bearing
6 October 2017 over the HP’s andIEI,obviously
HYDERABAD on the scheme cost 48)
Pumping Head
 Pumping head shall be decided carefully as in major LI
schemes, 1m head also has impact on scheme capital as well as
running cost.
Pumping head has bearing on :
* Pump Capacity
* Pipe thickness & surge protection devices
* Running Cost as well as capital cost
( Approximately 11 KW pump capacity is required to lift 1
cumec of water to 1m head ).
1 MW of pump costs Rs 3.5 Cr approx.

DESIGN OF PUMPS
 Pumps act as heart of LI Scheme and play important role in the
performance as well as efficiency of the LIS.
 A designer should have a comprehensive knowledge on availability
of various types of pumps and their applications along with their
limitations.
 Any wrong judgement in selection of pumps may lead to
procurement of unsuitable pump and the scheme may face threat of
repairs & maintenance along with non-functionality to the design
requirement of the scheme.
 Higher capacity increases unnecessarily the capital cost as well as
power consumption and on the other hand lower capacity will not
deliver design discharge.

Factors deciding type Of Pumps
Type of pumps to be adopted is governed by :
Hydraulic requirement such as discharge and
total pumping head
Pump house location & depth
Suction lift
Pump capacity
Manufacturing limitations of respective pumps /
manufacturing company

Types of Pumps
Horizontal Centrifugal Pumps - Applicable for medium
heads and discharges and has the limitation of suction
lift and hence may be better suited for LIS on canals or
tanks with total suction lift less than 6.0m.
Vertical Turbine Pumps - Applicable for schemes
with high heads and discharges. Best suited for the
schemes where the suction lift is more than 6.0m and
more applicable to schemes on rivers.
Concrete / Metallic Volute Pumps - Applicable for
schemes with high heads and huge discharges.
Francis turbine Pumps - Applicable for very high
heads and very huge discharges.

Horizontal Centrifugal
Pumps
-When Suction lift is less than 6.0m

-Applicable for lifting from Canals
- For low heads and low discharges

Vertical Turbine Pumps
When horizontal centrifugal pumps are not

favourable i.e., for suction lift more than
6.0m
Huge discharge with suction lift less than
6.0m,
Applicable for wide ranges of discharges &
heads.
Efficiency of the pumps is about 85% to 88%
( approx ).
VERTICAL TURBINE PUMPS
CONCRETE VOLUTE PUMP
-Applicable for lifting from reservoirs & rivers

-For high heads and high discharges
-Pump rating may be upto 15.0 MW
-When fluctuation of water levels is > 25.0m

Concrete / Metallic Volute Pumps
Similar to dry pit pumps arrangement
Applicable for capacities more than VT pumps.
Cannot be used for unlimited capacities / huge
magnitudes
Useful for discharge of each pump upto 10 cumecs and
head is less than 150m
Volute and draft tube will be embedded in the concrete
Volute Pumps with head more than 50.0m need metallic
lining of volute and may be imported.
Efficiency of pumps is about 89% to 90%( approx)
Discharge control is not possible and need more power
even for reduced discharge ( unlike Francis turbine )

TYPICAL PUMP HOUSE DRAWING CONCRETE
VOLUTE PUMP / VERTICAL TURBINE PUMP

Pump & Motor of GLIS PS

Draft Tube & Volute

Spiral Case

6 October 2017
OVERVIEW OF METALLIC
IEI, HYDERABAD
VOLUTE PUMPS 61
Dry Pit / Francis Turbine Pumps
These are Turbines used for power generation and also
called as reversible turbines
Useful and economical for very high heads ( above 100
m )with huge discharge ( above 10 cumecs ).
Economy can be achieved by reduction in number of
pumps, lifts and balancing reservoirs. etc,. but with
shorter length of pressure mains
Control on discharge is possible resulting power savings
during fluctuations of discharge & heads
O & M problems are minimum
Efficiency of pumps is 90% to 91% ( approx ).
Scheme with these pumps for low head and small discharge
or with lengthy pressure mains is uneconomical
These pumps are going to play vital role in the interlinking
of rivers where it is required to lift huge quantity of water
to very high heads.
These pumps are installed in AMR Project ( SLBC LIS ),
located on the foreshore of Nagarjuna Sagar Dam and is
designed to lift 68 cumecs of water to a total head of 102m
to irrigate 89032 ha ( 2.2 lakh acres ) using 4 numbers of
19000 KW ( each ) pumps.

Arrangement of Francis Turbine Pumps
-Applicable for lifting from reservoirs & 25000
rivers EL 294.00
-For very high heads and huge discharges 500 500

-Pump rating may be very high
E2 EL 279.00
CONTROL ROOM
EL 273.50
P.T & S.A CUBICLES, EXCITATION
EQUIPMENT 11 KV CUBICLES ETC.
EL 268.00
SURGE POOL SFC EQUIPMENT
L.T. BOARDS (415 V)
PUMP STARTING ISOLATORS
EL 262.50
15000
NE
LI
RY
500 20000 500
VE
LI
DE
11000 9000
UNIT
CONTROL
PANELS
FOR TENDER PURPOSE ONLY
EL 233.00
CPU
RECIVER
NGR
CUBICLES
5000
EL 225.00
GREASE
PUMP
OIL
LIFTPUMP
5000
OPU
SUMP
TANK
EL 223
+ EL 218.50 + EL 218.00 EL 217.00

+ EL 216.50 EL 215.00
EL 213.00
2.060 KM 2.100 KM 2.150 KM 2.170 KM 2.185 KM
NOTE:
1) DISCHARGE LINE (DELIVERY LINE) OUTLET IS AT EL 340M

Types of Pumps adopted in LI Schemes in
Erstwhile Andhra Pradesh
• Francis / Volute type ( Dry well Pumps )
Godavari Lift Irrigation Scheme, Bhima LIS, Intake
Pumping Station of SYP, Medaram Pumping
Station of SYP & Gangadhara Pumping Station of
SYP
• Vertical Turbine Type ( Wet well Pumps )

Kodimial Pumping Station of SYP, LT Potharam
Pumping Station of SYP & Jogapur Pumping
Station of SYP

Sripada sagar project Schematic Layout

Reinforcement for Draft69Tube
Divergent pipe
The Volute and Divergent pipe
Number of Pumps
Number of pumps and pump houses to be adopted are
dependent on :
 Capacity of Pumps
 Specific Speed
 Suction Lift and
 Type of pumps
( Minimum of 4 pumps are desirable to facilitate better

operational flexibility as stand by pumps are not provided
now. )
Data Required for Pumps Design
 Total discharge of the scheme to be lifted
 Lowest water Level ( LWL ) below which pumping not required
 MFL / FRL / FSL of the river / reservoir / canal as the case may be.
This helps in fixing the platform level and type of the pump.
 Delivery Level of tank to which water is to be lifted ( shall be above
FRL )
 Peak level in alignment if higher than delivery level and its chainage
 Length of pressure mains required from the pump house to cistern
 Pumping hours : Pumping hours has the bearing over the HP’s and
obviously on the cost of the scheme. Pumps shall be designed for
24 hours operation except in special conditions. If pumping is
designed for 20 hrs, project cost increases by 20% and so on.
Determination Of Pumping Head
Total pumping head should be arrived with care as
it has the bearing on the performance of the pump
as well as on the scheme cost.
 Excess selection of head would lead to un-
necessary increase in pump capacity and power
consumption
Lesser head would lead to non-functionality of the
pumps to design efficiency as well as design
discharge.
Total pumping head is obtained on summation of :
Static head between LWL & delivery level / Peak level
( For Optimization of pumping capacity and scheme
economy, it is always desirable to design pumps
with normal water levels instead of LWL )
Frictional losses in pumping lines and pressure mains
Losses due to exit, entry and bends
System resistance losses due to the combined /
operation of pumps and pressure mains

• Capacity of Motors
• Motor capacity may be 15% to 25% more than pump
capacity )
• For high magnitudes, it can be 25% and for medium
magnitudes is with small fluctuation of head, can be 15%.
Types Of Motors
• Induction Motors - Rating is limited to 2 to 3 MW
with low efficiency consuming more power
• Synchronous Motors - Rating is more than 3 MW with
high efficiency around 97%. All major LI Schemes will be
with synchronous motors.

• Selection of Voltage of Input Supply to Pumping
Station
• If Total Load of Pumping Station
10 to 12 MW - 33 KV dedicated line is desirable
12 to 50 MW - 132 KV line
> 50 MW - 220 KV line

INTAKE SUMP / FOREBAY
 The objective of sump and approaches is to provide storage and
good / smooth flow conditions in sump.
 Design with poor geometric features results undesirable flow
conditions in the sump & reduces pump efficiency.
 To develop uniform, steady and non-turbulent flow conditions
in the sump, max velocity at the entry of forebay shall be 1.2 m/s
and 0.30 m/s near the pumps.
 Forebay may be tapered with limiting enlargement angle in plan
to 20 degrees and bed slope in elevation 10 degrees.
 However, it is desirable to provide 15 degrees in plan and bed
slope of 8 degrees. Further, physical sump model studies is pre-
requisite for major LI Schemes.

Hydraulic Provisions of VT Pump House
 Trash rack shall be provided in front of
the pumps itself but not at the entry of
10000
the forebay to avoid trash entry into SLAB S2 BEAM B6 BEAM B7
V V
CRANE GIRDER
impeller. BEAM B5
V
+ 346.00
V
+ 343.75 REFLUX VALVE
 Distance between the pump rear wall COLUMN C1
W
+ 341.25
SLAB S1
and the trash rack shall be between 4D to 5000

BEAM B2
BEAM B4
3500 2500
2500
1500
+ 334.00
8D depending upon the percentage of

+ 329.25
obstruction through trash rack BEAM B3
+ 324.50
(Generally it may be 6D)
 Pumps shall be 4.5m (approx) away
+ 319.75
+ 317.75
+ 314.50
from D/S of PH wall to accommodate

non-return valve & butterfly valve
Hydraulic Provisions of VT Pump House ( Cont.. )
 Stoplog shall be provided behind the trashrack
 A breast wall between trashrack and stoplog upto LWL from top not
only improves hydraulic condition but also reduces trashracks &
stoplogs heights thereby reduces scheme cost.
 RCC piers are generally provided in between pumps to support
pumps, pump house, to accommodate stoplog & trash rack grooves
and also to act as baffle walls in between pumps to improve
hydraulic conditions.
 Generally minimum of 1.0m thick piers are required to
accommodate stoplog grooves on either sides.

Forebay sides on water side shall be vertical
( atleast upto LWL ) as slopes will cause off
sets at pump house generating vortices.
Jump formation shall be strictly avoided
near pumps as it creates turbulence.
Proposals of intake sump for major LIS shall
be ascertained by physical sump model studies
for fine tuning of the flow conditions and
satisfied, before commencement of execution.
Intake sumps in the river foreshore shall be
provided with controlling arrangement at
entry of forebay also to facilitate maintenance
of the sump, in addition to gates provision in
front of the pumps.
DESIGN OF PUMP HOUSE
Pump houses can be classified as :
 Wet Pit Pump House - The pump will be
submerged in the water. Substructure will be with water
for full area.
Ex : Pump house with Vertical turbine pumps.
The dimensions of VT pump house / sump can
be calculated based on the guide lines given in BHRA /
HIS / IS : 15310.
 Dry Pit Pump House - It is also called as reversible
turbine. Access to all the components including pumps
will be there. Substructure will be without water and in
dry condition because of which maintenance is easy.
Ex : Francis turbines and Volute Pumps
Pump House / Pumping
Station Components SLAB S2
9250
BEAM B6 BEAM B7
Approach Canal
+ 356.75
V V
BEAM B5 + 353.75 V
MANUALLY OPERATED V
225 Th BRICK WALL
+ 351.50 REFLUX VALVE 4000 Ø MANIFO
( TENTATIVE )
SLUICE VALVE
+ 349.00
SLAB S1
Intake/Sump/Forebay/Surge pool
+ 346.50 + 347.00 + 346.50

4500 3500 2000 1500 TO PIPE LINE
LWL + 342.50 1000 Th PIER + 343.00
STOPLOG GROOVE
+ 338.00
250 Th C.C. IN M10 GRADE + 338.50
+ 337.50
Sub structure / sump

1000 Th R.C.C. RAFT
500 13500

( SECTION 1 - 1 )
Super structure to accommodate
2
Pumps & Motors + 346.50
C1
C3
9250
W
C3
C1
+ 346.50
5000
+ 347.00
W RS1
REPAIR BAY
26000 5000
 Service / maintenance bay

+ 347.00 C1 1000 Th STEINING C1
500 3000
+ 338.50
+ 338.00
BEAM B1
W
500
Th + 346.50
500 C1 BEAM B2 C1
4000
+ 338.00
TRASHRACK GROOVE
Control panel room

REFLUX VALVE
C1 1000 Th PIER C1
1 SLUICE VALVE
4000 Ø MANIFOLD
2.0 m WIDE
SILT TRAP
6 x 4.00 + 5 x 1.00 = 29.00 m
+ 338.50
W
BEAM B1
2500
10000
5000
LEVEL + 340.50
Gantry for Pumps
4000
+ 338.00
W
STOPLOG GROOVE
C1 1000 Th PIER C1 + 346.50

3
+ 338.50
+ 347.00
+ 338.00
Stoplogs & Trash racks

C1 1000 Th PIER C1
0
550
1000
+ 338.50
+ 347.00
+ 338.00
4000
3 C1 C3 C3 C1
+ 375.00
10000
4750
Dewatering Pumps
W
CONTROL PANEL
+ 346.50 C2 C2
+ 346.50
+ 347.00
4750
W
C3 C3
C2 RS2 C2
Fire
2
Water Pumps
83
PRESSURE MAINS / WATER
CONDUCTOR SYSTEM
Pressure mains function as nerves of LI scheme and they
consume lions share of the project cost whenever pipe
lengths are in Km.
length of pipe has direct bearing on pumping head
thereby on pump capacity & surge protection system.
MS pipes and PSC pipes are under more usage in LIS.
It is desirable to limit the velocity in MS pipes to 2.0 m/s
and 1.5 m/s in PSC pipes.
Velocity more than 2.0 m/s in MS pipes may be
considered for the schemes with shorter length of pipes
duly examining the impact on pump capacity.
Max Dia of 3.0m is under more usage

MS pipe thickness may be calculated based on :
 Deflection Criteria
 Stress Criteria - Compressive Stress &
Tensile Stress
 Buckling
 Minimum thickness of MS pipe may be as per
recommendations given in IS : 1916.
 As a thumb rule, D/t ratio may be provided 185 for pipes
with shorter length & medium heads and D/t ratio between
185 to 150 for high heads with lengthy pipes, subject to
satisfying the surge conditions.

SURGE PROTECTION SYSTEM
 Whenever power failure occurs, rapid changes in
velocity and associated change in pressure results in the
pipe line causing surge pressure.
 Power failure leads to movement of upsurge and down
surge waves along the rising main and the waves travel
with high speed developing low & high pressures all
along the pipe line.
 Down Surge - Related to pressure drop or
minimum pressure. Pressure drop immediately after
power failure at peak locations causes negative
pressure, which may even go down to vapour pressure.
 Up Surge - Related to pressure rise or
maximum pressure. When separated water column
rejoins, sudden pressure rise occurs

Surge analysis is a very complicated phenomenon and needs
thorough analysis of the pipe line profile w.r.t surge heads to
assess type and number of surge protection devices at appropriate
locations.
Due attention shall be given to the surge analysis of pipe lines for
schemes with high heads and lengthy pipes.
The surge generated can be controlled by providing combination of
surge protection devices at various locations.
Various Surge protection devices ( in ascending order of probable
cost ) :
 Air Valves ( Must be designed for Pr at location )
 Stand Pipe
 Surge relief Valves
 Zero velocity valves
 One Way & Two Way Surge Tanks
 Air Vessels

Water Hammer Conditions
Surge effect depends on topography / terrain, velocity and pipe
length and is predominant when frictional losses are more.
 High Points in the pumping main alignment
 Possibility of Water column separation in the main due to

sudden power failure
 Pipe line gradient is steeper than 1 : 20
 Ratio of frictional loss to working head is less than 0.7
 Presence of Check valve with slow closing arrangement
 Velocity of normal flow exceed 1.0 m/s

DELIVERY CISTERN / OUT FALL
STRUCTURE
 Required to dissipate the energy of free
water fall from pipe to avoid erosion of
canal
 Bed level of the Cistern should always be
kept below the bed level of the delivery
canal.
 Pipe invert level must be above FSL/FRL
to avoid reverse flow
 Pipe shall be almost nearer to the GL for
pipe safety
 Outfall may abut the face of tank bund,
if any, but not be located in bund line

SCADA ( Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition )
LIS with Multiple pumping
stations needs proper monitoring
and vigilance for better
synchronization, for which
SCADA installation is mandatory.
SCADA collects and detects
data such as :
Non-functioning of pumps in
any of the pumping stations
Non performance of any of the
surge protection devices such as
air vessels / One way surge tanks
( OWST ) etc,.

SCADA(Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition)
Records data during operation of
the scheme
Monitors inflow and outflow
discharges of pumps
SCADA will be controlled at one
station monitoring total alignment.
Origin of failure of any component
of the system enroute the
alignment can be detected using
SCADA, with the help of which
operation of other pumping
stations can be controlled.

H N S S PHASE I - PS1
CONSTRUCTION PHOTOS

Pipe Testing & Thickness
 Radiography test
 UV Test
 Hydraulic Test – To be
performed above design
working pressure to determine
water tightness of joints
 Hydraulic test may be 1.5
times design pr as per codal
provisions and 1.25 times as
per AWWA.
TADIPUDI LIS
6 October 2017
08.12.2010 IEI, HYDERABAD 117
ONE WAY SUTGE TANK

Reference Codes / Manuals for L.I.Schemes(Excluding Drypit Type)
Code Number Year Code of practice for
BHRA Manual on " Hydraulic design of

Pump sumps and intakes"
IDC Manual on L.I.Schemes
Manual on water supply and treatment prepared by the Expert
committee, Govt. of India, Ministry of Urban development,
New Delhi determining the acceptability of Hazen-Williams
1999 Coefficient (Value of "C")
783 1985 Laying of concrete pipes
5822 1994 Code of practice for Laying of electrically welded steel pipes
for water supply
784 2001 Pre-stressed concrete pipes ( Including fittings)
458 1988 Per-cast concrete pipes(with and without Reinforcement)
456 2000 Plain and Reinforced Concrete
1916 1989 Specifications for steel cylinder pipe with concrete
lining and coating
3589 2001 Specifications for steel pipe for water and sewerage
(168.3 to 2540 mm Outside Diameter)
11639 (p -1&2) 1986 Criteria for design of surface penstocks
800 1984 steel structures
13 822 1970 Code of procedure for inspection of Welds
14 4853 1982 Recommended practice for Radiographic inspection of fusion
welded butt joints in steel pipes
15 1182 1983 Recommended practice for Radiographic inspection of fusion
welded butt joints in steel plates
16 2062 1999 Steel for general structural purposes - specifications
17 5504 1997 Specifications for spiral welded pipes
18 5330 1984 Design of Anchor or thrust blocks
19 SP 16 1980 Design Aids for IS - 456
20 SP34 Hand Book on concrete reinforcement detailing
21 875(1 - 5) 1987 Dead Loads; Imposed Loads; Wind Loads
Snow Loads; Spl and Combination Loads
22 1893(part -1) 2002 Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures -
General provisions and Buildings
23 2911 1979 Design and construction of Pile Foundations
24 IRC - 78 2000 Standard specifications for road bridges -
Foundations and Sub-structures
25 2950 1981 Design and construction of Raft foundations

26 6403 1981 Determination of Bearing Capacity of shallow foundations
27 2720(1-41) 1987 Methods of test for soils
28 2131 1981 Methods of SPT for soils
29 8009(p2) 1980 Calculation of settlements of foundations
30 10262 1982 Recommended guidelines for concrete mix design
31 383 1970 Coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete
32 1786 1985 HYSD Bars and Wires for concrete reinforcement
33 2974 (P -5) Design and construction of Machine foundations
34 4326 1993 Earthquake Resistant Design and construction of buildings
35 13920 1993 Ductile detailing for R.C.C structures subjected to Seismic forces
36 11908 1988 Recommendations for cement mortar lining for cast iron ,
mild steel and ductile - iron pipes (Fittings for transportation
of water)

THANK YOU By Dr.I SNRAJU,Certd & Member-TAC,WRD,AP.
126

CM&CD Works On Canals and Design of Lift Irrigation Schemes

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CM&CD Works On Canals and Design of Lift Irrigation Schemes

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CM&CD works on Canals and Design of Lift

Dr I Satyanarayana Raju, MTech,MBA,MPhil,BL,FIE,PhD.,

CANALS CANAL STRUCTURE

Main Branch Major Minor Field Cross Drainage Cross Masonry

Contour Canal Ridge Canal Side Slope Canal

OFF TAKE TAKING

CROSS DRAINAGE WORKS CROSS MASONRY WORKS

CROSS DRAINAGE WORKS

AQUEDUCT/UT/VIADUCT SP SYPHON LEVEL CROSSING INLET & OUTLET

DRAINAGE SYPHON CANAL SYPHON

CROSS MASONRY WORKS

REGULATION & CONTROL WORKS COMMUNICATION WORKS

Canal regulation works:

Functions of head and cross regulator:

Parameters for judging the function of outlet are:

6 October 2017 IEI, HYDERABAD 29

 They are costly with respect to benefit cost ratio compared to

6 October 2017 IEI, HYDERABAD 30

• PUSHKARA L.I.S. - 1,85,906 Ac

6 October 2017 IEI, HYDERABAD

6 October 2017 IEI, HYDERABAD 32

6 October 2017 IEI, HYDERABAD 33

I) Civil Structure & Associated components /

II ) Electro-Mechanical and

6 October 2017 IEI, HYDERABAD 34

TRASHRACK GROOVE BEAM B2 BEAM B1

Approach Canal on U/S of Pump

CROSS SECTIONAL ELEVATION OF JACKWELL CUM PUMP HOUSE

+ 347.00 C1 1000 Th STEINING C1

Super structure to accommodate

Pumps & Motors 1 C1 1000 Th PIER C1

Balancing Reservoirs / tanks

C1 1000 Th PIER C1 + 346.50

Gravity Canal with CM & CD

Pumps & Motors

TRASHRACK GROOVE BEAM B2 BEAM B1

Fire water Pumps

EOT crane for

+ 347.00 C1 1000 Th STEINING C1

C1 1000 Th PIER C1 + 346.50

pump house C1 1000 Th PIER C1

Transformers & Sub

Surge Protection Devices

 Valves such as air valves at

CROSS SECTIONAL ELEVATION OF JACKWELL CUM PUMP HOUSE

+ 347.00 C1 1000 Th STEINING C1

delivery pipes of pumps and 1 C1 1000 Th PIER C1

C1 1000 Th PIER C1 + 346.50

Stoplogs & Trash racks

Alignment freezing comprises finalisation of :

6 October 2017 IEI, HYDERABAD 41

Delivery I LIFT III

AVG.G.L +18.00 +18.45 +18.80

scheme as lengthy pipe results increases in:

•- Pumping head there by pump capacity

•- Surge protection devices

•- and capital cost

6 October 2017 IEI, HYDERABAD 44

Delivery I LIFT III

AVG.G.L +18.00 +18.45 +18.80

• Presence of intermediate tanks

Design discharge of pumps can be reduced without

6 October 2017 IEI, HYDERABAD 49