Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(A Take-Away from the book, “Think Small” by Owain Service & Rory Gallagher)
By Judith Planas-Aguilar
October 10, 2019
Service and Gallagher cull the concepts from reliable academic studies conducted over the
past 50 years, which have been adapted by no less than the Nudge Unit of the of the UK
government in Downing Street.
The concept is an offshoot of Nobel prize-winner Daniel Kahneman’s dual process theory
that applies the’ fast and slow thinking systems’ onto management practices. According to
Kahneman, fast thinking deals with automatic cognitive functions, e.g. brushing your teeth, activities
that require little or insignificant/automatic mental effort. The slow process is more deliberative and
reflective, and requires greater effort to perform.
Kahneman states that a person needs to develop his fast system so that he can do other
“slow” thinking work. Service and Gallagher point out the synergism of both systems because it is
only when automaticity and effortless functioning is developed that the slower system can perform
optimally. Applying this theory, Service and Gallagher imparts the belief that by setting in place the
fast system, a person is able to expend energy on the more effortful slow thinking activities.
Service and Gawain catch one’s attention by going the opposite of the present-day common
practice , i.e., GO BIG to attain big dreams. But these two raised important flags that caused some
job centers in UK to pause, re-think their operations which eventually helped them attain huge gains.
system effective. For example, if one attains better the Where rewards are concerned, there
sub-goal of better skills in teaching reading, his/her must be continuous application of
reward would be a ticket to a play that also enhances monitoring, feedback, personnel
the skill. development and upliftment.
The reward must be meaningful, .i.e., it must be a
source of motivation.
Giving and earning the reward must be binding. This can
be done with a commitment referee or accountability
partner to keep track of attaining the goal.
There must be something at stake for the personnel.
Service and Gallagher mention the concept of “loss
aversion.” Most people are less inclined to lose what
they value than to gain something of equivalent measure
which they do not have. This means putting something a
person is likely to lose as a part of the reward system is
a powerful motivator.
3. Use small rewards to build good habits
4. Beware of backfire results
Resolving Measures
Staff vs. Staff (Personal Grievances)
Allow a private but open, guided forum with the two conflicting personnel setting the
maintenance of a fluid and amicable work relationship as a goal.
Sir:
I just want to say thank you for a most enjoyable class . I learned a lot without having to
regurgitate the theories we had been overstuffed with at the lower levels. Thank you for not
subjecting us to another round of that. It was pure serendipity that just by making us chew on the
realistic, current practices, pushing us to upscale our analysis, you have actually elevated our
appreciation of Ph D classes. By capitalizing on self-learning through our own readings, you have
made the course more palatable for our overfed yet vacuous minds, enabling the concepts to
crystalize and be fused into our practice. Most importantly, you gave the “PhD” label dignity and
honor in terms of content and approach. I really appreciated your style.
Judith Aguilar