Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http://er.aera.net
An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning
David W. Johnson and Roger T. Johnson
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER 2009; 38; 365
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X09339057
Published on behalf of
http://www.aera.net
By
http://www.sagepublications.com
Additional services and information for Educational Researcher can be found at:
Subscriptions: http://er.aera.net/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.aera.net/reprints
Permissions: http://www.aera.net/permissions
The widespread and increasing use of cooperative learning is one of (Hartup, 1976; D. W. Johnson, 1980; D. W. Johnson &
the great success stories of social and educational psychology. Its R. Johnson, 1981d; Ladd, 1999; Lewis & Rosenblum, 1975). It
success largely rests on the relationships among theory, research, and was not until the 1980s that cooperative learning began to be
widely accepted.
practice. Social interdependence theory provides a foundation on
The application of social interdependence theory to education
which cooperative learning is built. More than 1,200 research studies
has become one of the most successful and widespread applica-
have been conducted in the past 11 decades on cooperative, com- tions of social and educational psychology to practice. Although
petitive, and individualistic efforts. Findings from these studies have small-group learning has been used since the beginning of human
validated, modified, refined, and extended the theory. From the the- existence, the modern use of cooperative learning primarily
ory, procedures for the teacher’s role in using formal and informal began in 1966 with the training of teachers at the University of
Minnesota in the effective instructional use of small groups
cooperative learning and cooperative base groups have been opera-
(D. W. Johnson, 1970; D. W. Johnson & R. Johnson, 1974).
tionalized. Those procedures are widely used by educators through-
Other ways of structuring cooperative learning include Teams-
out the world. The applications have resulted in revisions of the Games-Tournament (DeVries & Edwards, 1973), Student Teams
theory and the generation of new research. Achievement Divisions (Slavin, 1978), group investigation
(Sharan & Sharan, 1976), academic controversy (D. W. Johnson
& R. Johnson, 1979, 2007), jigsaw (Aronson, Blaney, Stephan,
Keywords: collaboration; cooperative learning; instructional Sikes, & Snapp, 1978), Team Assisted Individualization (Slavin,
practices Leavey, & Madden, 1984), complex instruction (Cohen, 1994),
the structural approach (Kagan, 1985), Cooperative Integrated
Reading and Composition Program (Stevens, Madden, Slavin, &
Farnish, 1987), and many more.
F
ew instructional practices have been more successfully The success of cooperative learning is unusual. Many instruc-
implemented in the past 60 years than cooperative learn- tional practices have been recommended during the past 60
ing. Cooperative learning was relatively unknown and years. The vast majority of instructional practices were never
unused in the 1940s, 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s. During this time, widely adopted (e.g., Richard DeCharms’s [1976] program of
there was considerable cultural resistance to the use of cooperative pawns and origins), and of the few that were adopted, most were
learning, based first on the social Darwinism that promoted inter- abandoned after a few years (e.g., programmed learning, Skinner,
personal competition with slogans such as, “It’s a dog-eat-dog 1968; the National Science Foundation–funded science and
world” and “survival of the fittest.” In the late 1960s, after com- social studies programs of the 1960s, the Magic Circle and other
petition began to be criticized (e.g., Sexton, 1961), the cultural values clarification procedures, multiple learning styles proce-
resistance switched to rugged individualism, that is, the view that dures, and Madelyn Hunter’s steps of teaching). Cooperative
strong individuals were built by isolating each student and having learning has been different. From being discounted and ignored,
students learn by themselves without interacting with classmates. cooperative learning has steadily progressed to being one of the
Individualistic procedures were recommended, such as programmed dominant instructional practices throughout the world.
learning, which was aimed at allowing students to go through the Cooperative learning is now utilized in schools and universities
curriculum at their own pace independent of classmates’ rates of throughout most of the world in every subject area and from
learning, and operant conditioning, which included behavioral preschool through graduate school and adult training programs.
modification (Skinner, 1968). Individualistic learning was then Its use so pervades education that, almost anywhere in the world,
challenged by social scientists who pointed out the essential role it is difficult to find a textbook on instructional methods, teach-
of peer interaction and relationships in socialization and learning ers’ journals, or instructional materials that does not discuss