You are on page 1of 7

0 Acadbmie des sciences / Elsevier, Paris

Palaeontology / Pal6ontologie
(Vertebrate Palaeontology / Palhontologie des Vertebr&)

New data on spinosaurid dinosaurs from the Early


Cretaceous of the Sahara
Nouvelles don&es SW des dinosaures spinosawides du C&ace infhieur
du Sahara
Philippe Taqueta*, Dale A. Russellb

a Laboratoire de palbontologie du M&urn national d’histoire naturelle, and URA 12 CNRS, 8, rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France
b North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences, and North Carolina State University, Department of Marine, Earth and
Atmospheric Sciences, Box 8208, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695-8208, USA

Abstract-New occurrences of spinosaurid dinosaurs from the Aptian of Niger and Albian of
Algeria augment our knowledge of Spinosaurusmaroccanus and permit the description of a
new taxon: Cristatusaurus /apparent; from the Gadoufaoua locality (Niger). Spinosaurs may
be separated into two distinct groups: one with longirostrine muzzles and premaxillae which
are rounded in cross-section, and a second with brevirostrine muzzles possessing a dorso-
posteriorly expanded crest. The Spanish genus Pelecanimimusmay be related to spinosau-
rids, rendering spinosaurs a more diversified group than previously thought. (0 Academic des
sciences / Elsevier, Paris.)

Aptian / Albian / Algeria / Niger / Morocco / Vertebrata / Theropoda / dinosaur

RhumC - La dkouverte de flOUVaUX restes de dinosaures spinosauridks dans 1’Aptien du Niger et


dans 1’Albien de l’Alg&ie permet de compl&er nos connaissances sur Spinosaurus maroccanuset de
dkrire un nouveau taxon : Cristatusauruslapparenti du gisement de Gadoufaoua (Niger). Les
rostres de spinosaures peuvent Ctre &par& en deux groupes bien distincts : le premier avec des
museaux longirostres et des prknaxillaires arrondis en section, le second avec des museaux
bkvirostres pourvus d’une cr6te dorsale dhelopp6e vers l’arri&re. Le genre espagnol Pelecanimimus
pourrait Ptre apparent6 aux spinosauridk, qui forment un groupe beaucoup plus diversifii: qu’on ne
le pensait. (0 Academic des sciences / Elsevier, Paris.)

Aptien / Albien / Algikie / Niger / Maroc / Vertebrata / Theropoda / dinosaure

Version abregee (voir p. 352)

1. Introduction plete skeleton was described by Charig and Milner (1986),


Milner and Croucher (1987), Charig and Milner (1997)
In 1915, Stromer described a fragmentary skeleton of a from the Barremian of England, and named Baryonyx after
large theropod from the Cenomanian of Egypt, including a a large, recurved manus claw. Its relationship to Spinosau-
well-preserved mandible, isolated teeth and several verte- rus has been much discussed (Paul, 1988; Buffetaut,
brae. He placed it in a new genus, Spinosaurus,in refer- 1989a and b; Charig and Milner, 1990; Buffetaut, 1992;
ence to dorsal spines measuring up to 165 cm long. The Milner, 1997; Charig and Milner, 1997), although the two
type specimen was destroyed during the Second World genera seem to be closely allied. Spinosaurs are consid-
War, but Stromer’s excellent descriptions and illustrations ered to have diverged from ancestral tetanurans (Milner,
amply define the peculiar theropod. Another, more com- 1996, 1997; Charig and Milner, 1997), or with ancestral

Note prksent6e par Philippe Taquet.


Note remise le 5 mars 1998, acceptbe apres r&&ion le 24 aofit 1998.
* E-mail: taquet@mnhn.ir
C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sciences de la terre et des planetes / Earth& PlanetarySciences
1998.327.347-353
P. Taquet. D.A. Russell

torvosaurs within tetanurae in Toarcian time (Sereno et al., Spinosaurus may be separated from Baryonyx by lack of
1994; Sereno et al., 1996; Sereno, 1997). More recently, dental serrations, from lrritator by more massive and less
two new genera from the Albian of Brazil have been homodont dentition, and Angaturma by longirostrine con-
considered as spinosaurs (Angaturama, Kellner and Cam- dition of premaxilla.
POS, 1996; Irritator, Kellner, 1996, Martill et al., 1996).
‘Spinosaurus B’ of Stromer (1934) was removed from the Discussion
Spinosauridae, and placed within a new and unrelated’
Spinosaurus maroccanus was originally separated from
group of theropods (Russell, 1996; see also the cervical
S. aegyptiacus on the basis of the greater length of the
vertebra figured by Sereno et al., 1996, figure 2D). Should
mid-cervical centra relative to the height of the posterior
the aberrant Hauterivian-Barremian Spanish ‘ornitho-
articular facet (yielding a length/height ratio of I .5 versus
mimisaur’ (P&ez-Moreno et al., 1994) also be related to
1 ..l in the Egyptian species; Russell, 1996). The average of
the spinosaurs, as suggested below, a highly diverse group
the length/height ratios in two cervical centra from Gara
of substantial antiquity is indicated.
Samani (which lack neural arches so that their position in
The purpose of this note is to characterise spinosaurian
the neck is uncertain) approximates that in the Moroccan
remains from two localities within the western Sahara.
species. The diagnosis given above is based upon the
Gadoufaoua is of Aptian age, and is situated south of the
anterior portion of a skull and fragment of the right dentary
Air Massif in northern Niger (Taquet, 1976, 1994). Gara
from Gara S.amani. The rostrum pertains to a mature
Samani is of Albian age and is located on the northwestern
animal, for the sutuies separating the premaxillae are
edge of the Tademai’t in the Algerian Sahara (de Broin et
closed, though not obscured. It contains characters which
al., 1971; Lefranc and Toutin, 1971).
further distinguish S. maroccanusfrom cranial elements of
C. lapparenti from Gadoufaoua.

2. Systematics The structure of the rostrum in MNHN SAM I24 (figure,


a-d) probably reflects conditions in spinosaurs generally.
Family The articulated premaxillae (anteriorly) and maxillae (pos-
Spinosauridae Stromer I91 5 teriorly) are of about equal width across the rostrum at
Spinosaurus Stromer 1915 their widest extent (I 34 vs. 137 mm), and are constricted
laterally in the region of the alveolar margin between them
Spinosaurus maroccanus Russell 1996 containing the premaxillary-maxillary suture (width
74 mm). There are alveoli for seven teeth in the premaxilla
(figure, b), as there are in C. lapparenti from Gadoufaoua
Referred specimens
(see below), the Brazilian spinosaur Angaturama (Kellner
MNHN SAM 124, rostrum containing both premaxillae, and Campos, 1996)
and, interestingly, also in Pelecanimi-
maxillae, vomers and fragment from midshaft of right mus (Perez-Moreno et al., 1994). The regular occurrence
dentary; SAM 125, fragment of premaxilla; SAM 126-l 27, of such a high but constant number of premaxillary teeth
centra of two cervical vertebrae; SAM 128, neural arch of in these genera is unique among theropods. The first
dorsal vertebra (figure, a-d). alveolus is small (15 mm in anteroposterior diameter), is
followed by two large, procumbant alveoli (33 and
Differential diagnosis (from Cristatusaurus lapparenti, 38 mm), and finally by two pairs of alveoli which decrease
see below) in diameter posteriorly (from 21 to 13 mm). The alveoli are
Premaxilla bulbous, slightly ‘hooked’ in lateral profile, bordered medially by a rounded crest which appears to be
decreases in height posteriorly. Posterodorsal surface distinct from the alveolar margin, and which Kellner and
rounded in cross-section; anteriormost premaxillary al- Campos (1996) suggested might be a vomer. No suture
veolus relatively small, lateral alveoli grouped into two was found between this structure and the alveolar margin
pairs. Maxillary and dentary teeth circular in cross- in an immature premaxilla from Gadoufaoua (see below),
section, maxillary teeth procumbent both anteriorly and either on the anteromedial region of the premaxillary
posteriorly. Dentary markedly constricted vertically in suture or the area of the premaxillary-maxillary suture
mid-section, alveoli grouped into pairs. Maxillary and posteriorly. The structure is here considered to belong to
dentary teeth with smooth carinae. the median palatal process of the premaxilla.

Figure. Spinosaurus maroccanus. Rostrum with premaxillae, maxillae, vomers. SAM 124. a. Dorsal view. b. Ventral view. c. Left lateral view. d.
Anterior view. Crisfatusaurus /apparentinov. gen., nov., sp. e. Anterior portion of premaxillae, left lateral view. GDF 365. f. Anterior portion of
premaxillae, left lateral view. GDF 366. g. Portion of right maxilla, medial view. CDF 366. h. Portion of right dentary, medial view. CDF 366.
i. Anterior dorsal vertebra, left lateral view. GDF 330. j. Neural arch and base of a spine of anterior dorsal vertebra, right lateral view, CDF 359.
n::(“,$i. _:

Spinosaurus maroccanus. Rostre avec prbmaxillaires, maxillaires, vomers. SAM 124. a. Vue dorsale. b. Vue ventrale. c. Vue latkrale gauche. d. Vue
antkieure. Cristatusaurus /apparent; nov. gen., nov.sp. e. Portion antkieure des premaxillaires, vue laterale gauche. GDF365. f. Portion antkrieure
des premaxillaires, vue latkralegauche. GDF 366. g. Portion d’un maxillairedroit, vue mkdiale. GDF 366. h. Portion dedentaire droit, vue mbdiale.
GDF 366. i. Vertgbre dorsale antkrieure, vue latkale gauche GDF 330. j. Arc neural et base d’une kpine d’une vertPbre dorsale antkrieure, vue
laterale droite. GDF 359.

348 C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sciences de la terre et des plan&es / Earfh & Planetary Sciences
1990.327,347-353
Early Cretaceous spinosaurid dinosaurs of the Sahara

h
4cm, 2cm
j i

C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sciences de la terre et des plan&es / Earth & Planetary Sciences 349
1998.327.347-353
P. Taquet, D.A. Russell

The maxilla described by Buffetaut (1989a, 1992) Cristatusaurus, n.g.


clearly belongs to Spinosaurus, and is nearly identical in
Etymology:
size to the maxillae in the rostrum from Gara Samani. The
maxillae are easily distinguishable from those of Car- Cristatus: crested (Latin).

~harodontosaurus in that their lateral surfaces are more Sauros: (Greek) lizard.
convex externally in a longitudinal direction, and slightly Type species: Cristatusaurus /apparent;, new species.
convex rather than concave vertically (Stromer, I 931; Diagnosis: The same as that of the type species.
Russell, 1996; Sereno et al., 1996). Furthermore, the al-
veoli are rounded in Spinosaurus maroccanus and sub- Cristatusaurus lapparenti, n. sp.
rectangular in Carcharodontosaurus. The Gara Samani Etymology: Cristatusaurus lapparenti, in recognition of
rostrum demonstrates that the lateral surfaces of the max- Albert F. de Lapparent, S.J., for his contributions to the
illae are inclined dorsomedially towards each other at an knowledge of Saharan dinosaurs, and his generous assis-
angle of about 45 degrees; this angle is slightly steeper tance during the field season of 1966.
anteriorly than posteriorly. A horizontal suture for the
Type locality: Gadoufaoua; GAD 5, niveau des Inno-
premaxilla is preserved on the maxilla described by Buf- cents, Tegama Formation, Aptian. Niger.
fetaut. Scaling to the Gara Samani specimen, the horizon-
Type specimen: (figure, f-h) MNHN GDF 366, both
tal rami of the premaxillae must have been very narrow,
premaxillae, portion of right maxilla and dentary.
their combined width being of the order of 40 mm in the
latter specimen. Alveoi for at least 9 maxillary teeth are Referred specimens (figure, e, i, j) MNHN GDF 365
preserved in this rostrum, increasing from I4 to 38 mm in fused premaxillae; dorsal vertebrae 357-359, 361.

diameter from the first to the fourth (they increase in size


Differential diagnosis (from S. maroccanus)
from first to third alveolus in Angaturama (Kellner and
Campos, 1996; p. 155), and decreasing thereafter to Premaxilla short, strongly ‘hooked’ in lateral profile,
28 mm. All are procumbant, but become decreasingly so increases in height posteriorly. Dorsal surface narrows into
posteriorly where they are more widely separated from crest posteriorly. Anteriormost premaxillary alveolus rela-
each other along the alveolar margin. Replacement teeth tively large, lateral alveoli uniformly closely spaced. Max-
are present on the medial surface of several alveoli. A illary and dentary teeth laterally compressed in cross-
tooth within the second alveolus clearly bears vertical section, maxillary teeth vertically oriented posteriorly.
ridges on its medial face. A narrow tongue of the premax- Dentary slightly constricted vertically in mid-section, al-
illa extends back to a position medial to the third maxillary veoli closely spaced. Maxillary and dentary teeth with
alveolus, at which point the anterior palatal bar becomes finely serrated carinae.
entirely replaced by the vomer (figure, b). This heavy Cristatusaurus may be separated from Angaturma and
element is inclined toward the opposite vomer at an angle lrritator by presence of dental serrations, from Baryonyx by
paralleling that of the lateral surface of the maxilla. Both brevirostrine condition of premaxilla.
vomers are firmly sutured together along the midlineof the
rostrum in a manner such that the sutural contact narrows Discussion
and rises posteriorly. The medial rim of the alveolar chan-
The type and referred premaxillae have been well de-
nels enters the vomerine surface dorsally. There is no
scribed and figured (Taquet, 1984; Kellner and Campos,
indication of a suture for the palatine posteriorly, nor any
1996). The suture separating the premaxillae is not fused
indication of choanal passages.
in the type specimen, indicating that the animal was
The dentary, to the extent that it is known, appears to be immature. The anteriormost preserved maxillary alveolus
similar to that of S. aegyptiacus. Small, medially situated (posterior margin only) is possibly homologous with the
alveoli in dentary fragments from Morocco are grouped third position in the Gara Samani rostrum. The ratio of the
into two pairs (Russell, 1996, p. 357, figures 5-6); the combined lengths of alveoli five to nine in the type and
dentary fragment from Gara Samani contains larger alveoli Gara Samani rostra indicates the former was about 44 %
(measuring about 24 mm in anterioposterior diameter) of the length of the latter. According to the average lengths
located, according to size and spacing, more posteriorly in of the alveoli, the referred premaxillae are about 1.5 times
the bone, opposite the sixth to ninth maxillary alveoli. The larger than those in the type. However, dorsal vertebrae
dentary alveoli are similarly procumbant. The carinae are from Gadoufaoua (GDF 358 with a centrum length of
smooth in unerupted maxillary and dentary teeth from about 135 mm) are as large as the largest known vertebrae
Morocco (Buffetaut, 1989a; Russell, 1996); they are also of S. maroccanus, although no known western Saharan
smooth in S. aegyptiacus (Stromer, 1915) and Angaturama specimen is known to be as large as the type of S. aegyp-
(Kellner and Campos, 1996, p. 155). tiacus (Stromer, 1915, p. 24). The largest alveolus pre-
Buffetaut (I 992) proposes that the neck of Spinosaurus served among fragmentary tooth bearing elements in an
did not form an upward curve when articulated. This infantile spinosaur from Gadoufaoua, is 7 mm long, sug-
curve is clearly indicated in the central facets of the gesting that the creature was less than one-fifth as long as
vertebra from Gara Samani, as wel I as those from Morocco an adult. A substantial range in age is indicated by mate-
(Russell, 1996, figure 4). rials referred to this species.

350 C. R. Acod. Sci. Paris, Sciences de la terre et des planetes / Earth & Planeby Sciences
1998.327.347-353
Early Cretaceous spinosaurid dinosaurs of the Sahara

The maxilla (figure, g) is the most complete of any so far ing ridge across a deep lateral excavation within the neural
referred to the Spinosauridae. On its dorsal margin, one arch. The neural arch is apparently often interrupted com-
suture ends above the ventral opening of the sixth alveolus pletely behind the posteriorly descending ridge, and the
and a bevelled surface widens posteriorly from a point posterior zygapophyses are supported by a separate pillar
above the ventral opening of the eighth alveolus. The of bone rising from the posterior end of the neural arches.
anatomical significance of these surfaces is unclear, for Zygosphene-zygantrum articulations are present.
there are no indications of choanae medially, and the
external naris and antorbital fenestra are not confluent in
lrrifator (Martill et al., 1996). The external nares are dis-
3. Conclusion
placed posteriorly on the rostrum of the latter genus, Spinosaur remains are relatively common in the western
perhaps as an adaptation to piscivory in spinosaurs Sahara, but appear so far to be limited to the anterior part
(Taquet, 1984; Charig and Milner, 1997). The roots of teeth of the cranial rostrum, teeth and presacral vertebrae. At
are in the positions of alveolus four to nine and possibly least two successive taxa are known, which may or may
ten open onto the dorsal surface of the maxilla. In all, a not be in an ancestor-descendant relationship. Milner
posteriorly incomplete series of eleven maxillary alveoli is (1997) places taxonomic significance on the presence or
suggested. Alveolar lengths decrease from 21 mm in the absence of serrations on the dental carinae. According to
third position to 11 mm in the tenth. this, Spinosaurus maroccanus from the Albian of Gara
A dentary fragment (figure, h) exhibits an anterior con- Samani and Morocco (which lacks serrations, as do Ang-
striction similar to, but less marked than in S. aegyptiacus aturma and lrritator from the Aptian-Albian of Brazil)
and in S. maroccanus. Semicircular alveoli are preserved would be separated on a familial level from C. /apparent;
for ten teeth, which decrease in diameter from 9 to 7.5 mm from the Aptian of Gadoufaoua and Baryonyx from the
(the eight central alveoli span 77 mm). In view of their very Barremian of Britain (which possess them). The rostra of
close spacing, it is possible that a complete dentary of this spinosaurs also appear to be separable into two major
species might contain in the order of 20 alveoli. Although S. kinds, a longirostrineform in which the rostrum is rounded
aegyptiacus has only 15 dentary teeth, Baryonyx has 32 in transverse section (figure, d) (as in Spinosaurus maroc-
(Buffetaut, 1992) and Pelecanimimus about 75 (Perez- canus, Baryonyxand Irritator), and a brevirostrine form in
Moreno et al., 1994). Fine serrations are present on the which it abruptly narrows into a dorsoposteriorly rising
carinae, unlike in Angaturama, where the posterior pre- longitudinal crest (figure, i) (C. lapparentiand Angaturma).
maxillary teeth are also more widely spaced. Vertical stria- Kellner (1996), Milner (1997) and Charig and Milner
tions are present on teeth of the juvenile type specimen, (1997) concur on several spinosaur synapomorphies: a)
although they have not been observed in GDF 365. These elongation of rostrum with external nares displaced pos-
striations appear to be variably present in S. maroccanus, teriorly, b) ventral margin of premaxilla concave, anteror-
and we are uncertain of their taxonomic significance. A dorsal margin of dentary upturned, c) teeth subcircular in
sagittal crest is present on the premaxilla in Angaturama, cross-section, with straight or slightly recurved crowns,
but the element is not as expanded laterally as in the and d) the presence of seven teeth in premaxilla. Irritator,
Gadoufaoua form (Taquet, 1984; Kellner and Campos, which is based on a moderately large, articulated cranium,
1996). Buffetaut (1992, p. 92) suggests that the Gadoufaoua was recognised as a spinosaur by Kellner (1996). Its mor-
premaxillae closely resemble those of Baryonyx. The teeth phology suggests several additional possible synapomor-
of Baryonyx are described by him as possessing fine serra- phies (cf. Martill et al., 1996): e) orbits posterolaterally
tions and a curvature of the crown, unlike in Spinosaurus, inclined, f) reduced supratemporal fenestra, g) median
but resembling those of S. aegyptiacus in the circular in longitudinal crest projecting posteriorly over temporal
cross section of the crowns (Buffetaut 1992, p. 93-94). region, and h) tooth roots occupy almost complete depth
The base of a spine preserved on the neural arch of an of maxilla (as is also the case in C. /apparent/l.
anterior dorsal vertebra (figure, j) (GFD 359, cited by Pelecanimimus, a small theropod from Hauterivian-
Taquet, 1976, p. 53) is less robust than a spine from a Barremian strata in Spain, exhibits several unusual auta-
neural arch of similar dimensions of S. maroccanus (15 pomorphies, including over 200 teeth, premaxillary and
versus 25 mm in transverse diameter, cf. Russell, 1996, anterior teeth which are “D” shaped in cross-section (the
figure 8). It is possible that the neural spines were not so remaining teeth are laterally compressed), and a manus
elevated in the species from Gadoufaoua. A transitional resembling that in ornithomimids (Perez-Moreno, 1994).
cervico-dorsal vertebra (figure, i) (GDF 330) bears a heart- The premaxilla also contains seven premaxillary teeth, a
shaped anterior central facet and a pleurocoel beneath the number unequalled in other dinosaurs (plateosaurids and
parapophysis, but lacks a hypapophysis. No other dorsal primitive ornithischians possess up to six premaxillary
vertebrae possess pleurocoels. teeth (Galton, 1990; Sereno, 1991), except spinosaurs.
The anterior margin of the transverse process of anterior The Spanish theropod possesses a median longitudinal
dorsal vertebrae is linked by a ridge to the anterior zygapo- crest in the temporal region (Briggs et al., 1997), as does
physis; a similar ridge descends from the centre of its kritator. Other attributes which occur in Pelecanimimus
ventral surface to the posterior base of the neural arch. Two and spinosaurs include: jugal does not reach antorbital
smaller laminae project anteroventrally from the descend- fenestra (cf. Martill et al., 1996, figure 3), maxillary teeth

C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sciences de la terre et des plan&es / Earth & Planetafy Sciences
1998.327.347-353
P. Taquet. D.A. Russell

larger than dentary teeth, dentary teeth unusually numer- spinosaurs. If so, spinosaurs were a much more diverse
ous (cf. Charig and Milner, 1990, 1997), absence of inter- group than previously suspected. Three family group
dental plates (cf. Buffetaut, 1989a), skull narrow and shal- names apply to them: Spinosauridae (Stromer, 19151,
low with elongated facial region (cf. Charig and Milner, Baryonychidae (Charig and Milner, 1986) and lrritatoridae
1990, 1997). (Martill et al., 1996). The morphology of spinosaurs is too
Pelecanimimus should be evaluated to determine poorly understood at present to attempt to assess the
whether or not it is an ‘ornithomimid-mimic’ related to the validity of the latter two.

Version abeg&
En 1915, Stromer a decrit une par-tie du squelette d’un grand Les caractkres du rostre (SAM 124) semblent typiques de
theropode du CCnomanien d’kgypte. I1 crea pour ce materiel celui de tous les spinosaures. I1 y a, en particulier, des alveoles
un nouveau genre, Spinosuurms, en reference a la longueur des pour sept dents sur le premaxillaire, tout comme chez
epines neurales des vertebres dorsales. Un autre squelette plus C. lapparenti,ainsi que chez le spinosaure bresilien Angatu-
complet a itte decrit par Charig et Mimer (1986, 1997) du rama et chez Pelecanimimus. Ce nombre, eleve et constant,
Barremien d’Angleterre et nomme Baryon~x. Les relations de des dents premaxillaires est unique chez les theropodes. Le
celui-ci avec Spinosuurus ont ete largement discutees (Buffe- rostre de la Gara Samani montre que les surfaces laterales des
taut, 1989a et b, Charig et Milner, 1990, Buffetaut, 1990, Charig maxillaires sont inclinees dorso-medialement a 45”. Le cou de
et Milner, 1997), et les deux genres semblent etroitement Spinosuwus forme une courbe vers le haut, ainsi que le
apparent& Recemment, deux nouveaux genres de 1’Albien du montrent les facettes centrales des vertebres de l’espece de la
Bresil ont ete consider& comme faisant partie des spinosau- Gara Samani, tout comme celles de l‘espece marocaine.
res : Angaturama (Kellner et Campos, 1996) ; Zrritator (Martill
et al., 1996 ; Kellner, 1996). Enfin l’ttrange scornithomimisaure m Cristatusaurus lapparenti n.g.
(Perez Moreno et al., 1994) de l’Hauterivien-Barremien d’Es-
pagne pourrait etre apparent6 egalement aux spinosaures, Cristatusauruslapparentin.g., nsp. est un nouveau spino-
saure de l’hptien de Gadoufaoua (Niger), represente par deux
ainsi que nous le suggerons.
extremites anterieures de premaxillaires, une portion de maxil-
Cette note a pour objet de decrire des restes de spinosaures
laire, une portion de dentaire et par des vertebres.
de deux localites du Sahara : ceux de 1’Aptien de Gadoufaoua
du Nord du Niger (Taquet, 1976, 1994) et de 1’Albien de la Gara
Samani du Nord-Ouest du TademaIt en Algerie (De Broin et al., Diagnose difhentielle de S. maroccanus
1971 ; Lefranc et Toutin, 1971). Les premaxillaires sont courts et plongent en bet vers
SystGmatique l’avant, mais leur hauteur augmente posterieurement. La sur-
Famille Spinosauridae Stromer 1915 face dorsdle forme une Crete vers l’arriere ; les alveoles pre-
Spinosaurms Stromer 1915 maxillaires les plus anterieurs sont relativement larges. Les
SpinosaurusmaroccanusRussell 1996 dents des maxillaires et des dentaires sont comprimees en
Specimens en reference : rostre avec premaxillaires, maxil- section ; la partie superieure des dents maxillaires est oblique
laires, vomers et fragment de dentaire (figure, a-d). vers l’arriere ; les dentaires sont legerement cornprimes verti-
calement dans leur partie moyenne, leurs alveoles sont conti-
Diagnose diffhentielle gus ; les dents maxilllaires et dentaires ont des car&es fine-
De Cristutusaurus lupparenti,voir ci-dessous ; premaxilllai- ment crenelCes.
res bulbeux, legerement en forme de bet en vue laterale et Cristatusauruspeut &tre &pare d’dngaturma et d’lrritator
dont la hauteur decroit posterieurement ; surface postero- par la presence de crenelures sur les dents, de Buryonyx par la
dorsale arrondie en section ; alveoles premaxillaires anterieurs condition brevirostre des premaxillaires.
relativement petits ; alveoles lateraux group& en deux paires ;
dents maxillaires et dentaires avec des car&es peu marquees. Discussion
Spinosaurus peut @tre &pare de Bavyonyx par l’absence de Le type de cette nouvelle espece appanient P un jeune
crenelures sur les dents, d’ltitator par sa dentition plus individu, dont la suture entre les deux premaxillaires n’est pas
massive et moins homodonte, et d’Angaturma par la condition encore fermee. Le maxillaire droit est assez complet et le
longirostre des premaxillaires. dentaire possede une constriction anterieure, moins marquee
toutefois que chez S. aeg#tbcus et S. maroccanus.
Discussion
Spinosaurusmaroccanusa ete &pare de S. aegyptiacus
Conclusion
(Russell, 1996) sur la base des proportions differentes des
vertebres cervicales. La diagnose peut &tre completee grace au En fonction de la presence ou de l’absence de crenelures sur
fragment anterieur de crane et de dentaire de la Gara Samani. la car&e des dents, il est possible de distinguer deux groupes
Les caracteres de ce rostre permettent egalement de distinguer parmi les spinosaures : l’un avec Spinosuurus maroccunus de
S.maroccanusde C. lapparenti. 1’Albien du Maroc et de FAlgerie, et Angaturama et Zrritatorde

352 C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sciences de la terre et des plan&es 1 Earth & Planetary Sciences
1998.327,347-353
Early Cretaceous spinosaurid dinosaurs of the Sahara

I’Aptien-Albien du Brksil ; I’autre avec CristutusaurusIappa- r&kit brusquement dorso-postkieurement en une c&e Ion-
renti de I’Aptien du Niger et Buvyonyx wulkeri du Bar&mien gitudinale (cornme chez C. Zapparenti et Angaturama).
d’Angleterre, qui poss6dent des crenelures sur les car&es de Pelecanimimus,petit thkropode de I’Hauterivien-Barr&
leurs dents. mien d’Espagne, doit @tre rkexamink pour que I’on puisse
De m&me, le rostre des spinosaures peut &tre &par6 selon determiner si cet animal (Imimetique des ornithomimides u est
deux formes difT&entes : une forme P museau long, avec un apparent6 aux spinosaures. Si cela ktait le cas, les spinosaures,
rostre de section arrondie dorsalement (comme chez 5’. I~ZLZYOC- auxquels il faut ajouter le nouveau genre saharien dkcrit
canus,et Zrritutor) et une forme g museau plus court, qui se ci-dessus, se seraient plus diversilk qu’on ne le pensait.

Acknowledgements. D.A.R. is grateful to D.E. Russell and D. Sigogneau-Russell for their gracious hospitality while he visited
collections in Paris. Photographs were taken by D. Serrette. plate by F. Pilard.

4. References Milner A.C. and Croucher R. 1987. ‘Claws’ the story (so far) of a
great British dinosaur, British Museum (Natural History), Equus Print,
London, 17 p.

Briggs D.E.G., Wilby P., P&ez-Moreno B.P., Sanz J.L. and Paul G. 1988. Predatory dinosaurs of the world, Simon and
Fregenal-Martinez M. 1997. The mineralization of dinosaur soft tis- Schuster, New ‘fork, 464 p.
sue in the Lower Cretaceous of Las Hoyas, Spain, /. Geol. Sot. Perez-Moreno B.P., Sanz J.L., Buscalioni A.D., Moratalla J.J., Or-
London, 154,587-588 tega F. and Rasskin-Gutman X. 1994. A unique multitoothed ornitho-
Broin F de, Grenot C. and Vernet R. 1971. Sur la decouverte d’un mimosaur dinosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of Spain, Nature, 370,
nouveau gisement de vertCbr& dans le Continental intercalaire saha- 363-367
rien : la Gara Samani (Algerie), C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 272, Series D,
Russell D.A. 1996. Isolated dinosaur bones from the Middle Creta-
1219-1221
ceous of the Tafilalt, Morocco, Bull. Mu&urn national d’Histoire
Buffetaut E. 1989a. New remains of the enigmatic dinosaur Spino-
nature//e, Paris, s&ie 4, 18, section C, 349402
saurus from the Cretaceous of Morocco and the affinities between
Spinosaurus and Baryonyx, Neues jahrb. Geol. u. Palaont. Monat- Sereno P.C. 1991. Lesothosaurus, ‘Fabrosaurids’, and the early
shefre, 2,79-87 evolution of Ornithischia, J. Vertebrate Palaeontology, 11,168-l 97
Buffetaut E. 198913. New remains of Spinosaurus from the Creta- Sereno P.C., Wilson j.A., Larsson H.C.E., Dutheil D.B. and Sues
ceous of Morocco, Archosaurian Articulations, 1,65-68 H.D. 1994. Early Cretaceous dinosaurs from the Sahara, Science,
Buffetaut E. 1992. Remarks on the Cretaceous theropodan dino- 266,267-271
saurs Spinosaurus and Baryonyx, Neues /ahrb. Ceol. u. Palsont.
Sereno P.C., Dutheil D.B., larochene M., Larsson H.C.E., Lyon
Monatshetie, 2,88-96
G.H., Magwene P.M., Sidor C.A., Varrichio D.J. and Wilson ].A.
Charig A.J. and Milner A.C. 1986. Baryonyx, a remarquable new 1996. Predatory dinosaurs from the Sahara and Late Cretaceous fau-
theropod dinosaur, Nature, 324,359-361 nal differentiation, Science, 272,986-991
Charig A.J. and Milner A.C. 1990. The systematic position of
Sereno P.C. 1997. The origin and evolution of dinosaurs, Annual
Baryonyx walkeri, in the light of Cauthier’s reclassification of the
Review Earth and Planetary Sciences, 25,435-489
Theropoda, in:Carpenter K. and Currie P.J. (Eds.), Dinosaursystemat-
icsrapproaches andperspectives, Cambridge University Press, Cam- Stromer E. 1915. Ergebnisse der Forschungsreisen Prof. E. Stromers
bridge, 127-140 in den Wiisten ;igyptens. II. Wirbeltier-Reste der Baharije Stufe (unter-
Charig A.]. and Milner A.C. 1997. Baryonyx walkeri, a fish-eating stes Cenoman). 3 Das Original des Theropoden Spinosaurus aegyp-
dinosaur from the Wealden of Surrey, Bu//. Natural history Museum, tiacus nav. gen., nav. sp., Abhandlungen der Kijniglich Bayerischen
Geology Series, S3, 1, 11-70 Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-physikalische Klasse,
Calton P.M. 1990. Basal Sauropodomorpha-Prosauropoda, in: XXVIII, 3, l-32
Weishampel D.B., Dodson P. and Osmolska H. (Eds.), The Dinosau- Stromer E. 1931. Ergebnisseder Forschungsreisen Prof. E. Stromers
ria, University of California Press, Berkeley, 320-344 in den Wtisten iigyptens. II. Wirbeltier-Reste der Baharijestufe (unter-
Kellner A.W.A. 1996. Remarks on Brazilian dinosaurs, Memoirs of stes Cenoman). 10. Ein Skelett-rest von Carcharodontosaurus nav.
the Queens/and Museum, 39,611-626 gen., Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften,
Kellner A.W.A. and Campos D. de A. 1996. First Early Cretaceous Mathematisch-naturwissentschaftliche Abteilung, Neue Folge, 9,
theropod dinosaur from Brazil with comments on Spinosauridae, l-23
Neueslahrb. Geol. u. Paliont. Abhandlung, 199, 151-l 66 Stromer E. 1934. Ergebnisse der Forschungsreisen Prof. E. Stromers
Lefranc J.P. and Toutin N. 1971. Un gisement de Desertella fou- in den Wiisten iigyptens. II. Wirbeltier-Reste der Baharijestufe (unter-
reaui (Lamellibranche preh&rodonte) dans le soubassement albien stes Cenoman). 13. Dinosauria, Abhandlungen der Bayerischen
du Tadema’it ouest (Sahara algkrien), Bull. Sot. Histoire Nature//e de Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-naturwissen-
I’Afrique du Nord, 62, 103-l 11 schaftliche Abteilung, Neue Folge, 22, l-79
Martill D.M., Cruickshank A.R.I., Frey E., Small P.G. and Clarke X. Taquet P. 1976 Ceologie et paleontologie du gisement de Cadou-
1996. A new crested maniraptoran dinosaur from the Santana Forma- faoua (Aptien du Niger), Cahiers de Pa/@onto/ogie, iditions du CNRS,
tion (Lower Cretaceous) of Brazil, /. Geol. Sot. London, 153, 5-8 191 p.
Milner A.C. 1996. Morphology, relationships and ecology of spi-
Taquet P. 1984. Une curieuse specialisation du crdne de certains
nosaurs, aberrant longsnouted Cretaceous theropods, /. Vertebrate
dinosaures carnivores du Crktace : le museau long et Ctroit des spino-
Palaeontology, 16, (supplement to 3), 53A
saurid&, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 299, Series II, 217-222
Milner A.C. 1997. Spinosauridae and Baryonychidae, in : Currie
P.J. and Padian K. (Eds.), Encyclopedia ofdinosaurs, Academic Press, Taquet P. 1994. L’empreinte des dinosaures, iditions Odile-Jacob,
New York, 699-700 Paris, 363 p.

C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Sciences de la terre et des planQtes / E&h & Planetary Sciences 353
1998.327,347-353

You might also like