Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Operating activities
Profit $96
Add (deduct) items not affecting cash :
Depreciation expense 69
Note: Bonds payable of $20 million were converted to common shares during 2011.
Or, Beg Balance of Bonds Payable +New Issue- Repayment- conversion of bonds to shares=Ending Bonds
Payable
Cash paid for rent = Rent expense – decrease in Prepaid rent – Increase in Rent payable
= $16,000 – ($7,000 – 0) – ($4,000 – 0) = $5,000.
Req. b (3 marks)
Cash paid to suppliers = Cost of goods sold – decrease in Inventory + decrease in Trade payables
= $293,000 + $25,000 – $36,000 + $61,000 – $32,000 = $311,000.
Req. d
Drapeau Corp.
Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year ended December 31, 2011
Operating activities
Profit $22,000
Add (deduct) items not affecting cash:
Depreciation expense 27,000
Gain on sale of land (2,000)
Loss on sale of equipment 4,000
Decrease in trade receivables 15,000
Decrease in merchandise inventory 11,000
Decrease in prepaid rent 7,000
Decrease in trade payables (29,000)
Increase in rent payable 4,000
Cash from operating activities $59,000
Investing activities
Acquisition of equipment (142,000)
Sale of land (Note 1) 11,000
Sale of equipment (Note 2) 30,000
Cash from (used in) investing activities (101,000)
Financing activities
Issuance of common shares for cash (Note 3) 84,000
Payment of dividends (Note 4) (7,000)
Cash from financing activities 77,000
Increase in cash 35,000
Cash balance, December 31, 2010 12,000
Cash balance, December 31, 2011 $47,000
Notes:
1. Cash received = Cost of land sold + Gain = ($38,000 – $29,000) + $2,000 = $11,000.
Req. e (2 marks)
Quality of earnings = Cash flow from operations / Profit = $59,000 / $22,000 = 2.68
The quality of earnings ratio measures the portion of earnings that was generated in cash. A ratio that
is higher than 1 indicates higher-quality earnings because each dollar of profit is supported by at least
one dollar of cash from operations.
Req. 2 (5 marks)
a.
Trade receivables, beginning $10,600
+ Sales revenue 980,000
– Cash collections from customers ( X ) [X = $934,300]
= Trade receivables, ending $ 56,300
b. The computation of the cash paid to suppliers is a two-step process.
Inventories, beginning $ 30,000
+ Merchandise purchases X [X = $620,000]
– Cost of sales (640,000)
= Inventories, ending $ 10,000
Req. 3 (5 marks)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Sale of furniture (amount determined in req. 2 above) $ 600
Purchase of furniture (note 1) (38,000))
Sale of investments ($1,000 change in balance + $800 gain) 1,800
Net cash flow used for investing activities $(35,600)
Note 1:
Cost of furniture, January 1, 2011 $26,000
+ Purchases during the year X
– Cost of furniture disposed of (5,000)
= Cost of furniture, December 31, 2011 $59,000
Purchases (X) = $38,000
Req. 4 (5 marks)
a.
Quality of earnings ratio = Cash flow from operations = $5,800 = 0.48
Profit $12,000
The quality of earnings ratio measures the portion of profit that was generated
in cash. This ratio helps establish whether there are significant differences between profit and
operating cash flows. In this case, the large increase in Trade receivables, which reflects sales
on account, reduced the amount of cash from operations. (1 mark)
b. Free cash flow = Cash flow from operations – Dividends paid – Capital expenditures
= $5,800 – ($18,000 + 600)* – $38,000 = –$50,200.
* Beginning RE + Profit – Dividends Declared = Ending RE
$25,300 + 12,000 – X = 19,300 ➔ X = $18,000
The decrease in Dividends Payable should be added to the Dividends declared to get the
amount of dividends paid.
Free cash flow represents the amount of cash that is available for additional capital
expenditures, investments in other companies, and mergers and acquisitions, without the need
for external financing. In this case, the operating activities did not generate sufficient cash to
cover dividends and capital expenditures. (1 mark)
Req. 5 (3 marks)
As a professional accountant, I need to ensure that the proposed change is justified based on
the available evidence. It should be consistent with IFRS. The proposed change would be
acceptable if the original estimate of the useful life of these assets was understated or if regular
maintenance or improvements increased the assets’ useful life. However, if the proposed
change is to improve the company’s financial performance without valid justification, I would
point out to Ms. Wong that such a change is not appropriate. It should be noted that the
proposed change would increase profit but not affect cash flow.