Confidence Area between Area in one

z-score
Level 0 and z-score tail (alpha/2)
50% 0.25 0.25 0.674
80% 0.4 0.1 1.282
90% 0.45 0.05 1.645
95% 0.475 0.025 1.96
98% 0.49 0.01 2.326
99% 0.495 0.005 2.576
An analyst of EDSA Sang Hotel sampled 20 customers from last year’s records and found out that th
mean sale per customer was $500 with a standard deviation of $110. A random sample of 25 custo
from this year’s record yielded an average sale per customer of $540 with a standard deviation of S
Assuming the sales per customer are normally distributed, can we conclude that there has been a
significant change in the average sales per customer?

n1 20 x1 500  s1 110 12100

n2 25 x2 540 s2 125 15625
df 43 alpha t2alpha/2,df
0.05 2.017
(2 d.p.) (3 d.p.)

t (3 d.p.) =   -1.124 Accept null hypothesis (“Y” for yes, “N” for no)?  y

t2alpha/2,df 2.322618 -2.016692 2.017

diff -40 nume -1.124168
229900 375000 14067.4419 118.6062471 35.5818741
0.09 0.3
and found out that the
m sample of 25 customers
ndard deviation of S125.
at there has been a

null hypo There is a significant difference

alter

if the (absolute value) t value is greater than the critical t value, you reject the null

if the t value less than critical, you accept (fail to reject null)

-1.124<2.323
absolute val (1.124) < 2.323
cal t value, you reject the null
Surveys on customers rating of excellence for the clients in EDSA Sang Hotel and Makati Sang
Hotel were compared. Out of 80 random samples from the former, 32 rated the hotel as
excellent. Out of 100 random samples from the latter, 14 rated the hotel as excellent. Using a
95% confidence interval to express the estimated difference in population proportions of
excellent ratings between the two group of customers, could you conclude that their excellence
rating proportions are significantly different?

n1 = 80 x1 = 32 n2 = 100 x2 = 14

p1 = 0.40 p2 = 0.14
Alpha z value lower Upper
(2 d.p.) 0.05 (2 d.p.) 1.96 (3 d.p.) 0.133 (3 d.p.) 0.387

Is difference significant? (“Y” for yes and “N” for no) Y

p.hat1 0.4 32 diff 0.26

p.hat2 0.14 14 MoE 0.003 0.001204 0.06483826
q.hat1 0.6 zMoE 0.12708299
q.hat2 0.86
0.133<p1-p2<0.378 0.26
d Makati Sang
hotel as
ellent. Using a
ortions of
their excellence
A study was conducted on the effect of an employee’s age group and level of work-life balance on his level of job
satisfaction. Respondents where asked to accomplished survey forms that allowed analyst to ascertain the age group that
they belong to, their level of work life balance (Level 1 = low, level 2 = average, and level 3 = high), and their level of job
satisfaction (1 is lowest and 7 is highest). Results for 24 respondents are presented below.

Employ a two-way ANOVA Model to test if the two factors cited have an effect on Job Satisfaction. Based on this, draw a
conclusion.

Source of Var. SS
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Row Mean (3 d.p.)
3 4 6 Age Group 15.042
Baby 4 4 5 W-L Level 16.083
Boomer 4 5 5 Interaction 1.083
2 6 7 Error 11.750
Cell Mean Total 43.958
3.250 4.750 5.750
(3 d.p.) 4.583
2 3 4
Millen- 3 3 4 Level 1
nials 2 2 3 3
2 4 4 4
Cell Mean 4
2.25 3.000 3.750
(3 d.p.) 3.000 BABY BOOMER 2
Overall
Col. Mean 2.750 3.875 4.750 Mean: 2
(3 d.p.) 3.792 3
2
MILLENIALS 2
 Anova: Two-Factor With Replication

ce on his level of job SUMMARY Level 1

o ascertain the age group that
high), and their level of job BABY BOOMER
Count 4
Sum 13
action. Based on this, draw a
Average 3.25
Variance 0.916667

MILLENIALS
df MS Critical F Observed F Count 4
(3 d.p.) (3 d.p.) (3 d.p.) Sum 9
1 15.042 4.414 23.043 Average 2.25
2 8.047 3.555 12.319 Variance 0.25
2 0.542 3.555 0.830
18 0.653 Total
Count 8
Sum 22
Average 2.75
Level 2 Level 3 Variance 0.785714
4 6
4 5
5 5 ANOVA
6 7 Source of Variation SS

3 4 Sample 15.04167
3 4 Columns 16.08333
2 3 Interaction 1.083333
4 4 Within 11.75
Total 43.95833
Level 2 Level 3 Total

4 4 12
19 23 55
4.75 5.75 4.583333
0.916667 0.916667 1.901515

4 4 12
12 15 36
3 3.75 3
0.666667 0.25 0.727273

8 8
31 38
3.875 4.75
1.553571 1.642857

df MS F P-value F crit

1 15.04167 23.04255 0.000143 4.413873

2 8.041667 12.31915 0.000426 3.554557
2 0.541667 0.829787 0.452153 3.554557
18 0.652778
23