Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Professor Szalay
English 2010
15 November 2021
ever been to downtown Salt Lake City, chances are you have seen some of them, often sitting
under shelters and bridges, wrapped in tattered clothing. You may even know someone who is or
has experienced homelessness. These people, in many cases through no fault of their own, have
lost their housing. Some may have pre-existing mental or physical health challenges that prevent
them from participating in our complex society completely, others may have grown a
dependence on narcotics or other substances. Many have simply lost the ability to afford housing
in Salt Lake Valley’s intense market, or were laid-off due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This does
not mean that they are any less human, or any less deserving of a second chance. In our time,
eliminating homelessness is not out of reach. Placing homeless people who meet strict
requirements into temporary housing is currently the most effective option available, but it
In 2005, then governor John Huntsman started the “Housing First” initiative, a plan that
would span over the next ten years aimed at reducing Utah’s homeless population. At the time, it
was discovered that it would be cheaper to find permanent housing for Utah’s chronically
homeless individuals than to run the several homeless shelters and soup kitchens1. A chronically
homeless person is characterized as having either lived on the streets for more than a year, or
four times over a three-year span2. Those who met with social workers and qualified for the
Housing First program were placed in permanent housing units. Residents of these units are
expected to pay either 30% of their income or 50$ a month, whichever is greater3. In 2005, there
were nearly 2,000 chronically homeless individuals, but by 2015 there were only around 2004.
The plan worked better than anticipated, with a 91% reduction in chronic homelessness, an
astounding accomplishment.
Although a remarkable success, this number has slowly been on the rise. At the beginning
of 2021 there were approximately 642 chronically homeless5 in Utah. It should be noted that
those statistics do not represent the total number of people who have experienced homelessness
in Utah throughout the year. What many do not know is that the average time spent homeless in
Utah is around 65 days (about 2 months)6, thus, not enough time to count as chronically
homeless. The real number of the homeless population on any given day (a rough average from
samples taken throughout the year) is around 3,565 individuals in 2021. The combined
unduplicated total of individuals who experienced homelessness at all in the year 2020 was
10,8467. It is safe to say that although we have made great strides in providing permanent
housing for the chronically homeless, there is still much work to be done.
1
Karen Graham, Utah’s Answer to Chronic Homelessness? Give Them a Place to Live.
2
Kelly McEvers, Utah Reduced Chronic Homelessness By 91 Percent; Here’s How.
3
Kelly McEvers, Utah Reduced Chronic Homelessness By 91 Percent; Here’s How.
4
Alex Hartvigsen and Karen Quackenbush, Comprehensive Report on Homelessness, 5
5
State of Utah Annual Report on Homelessness 2021, 18
6
State of Utah Annual Report on Homelessness 2021, 13
7
State of Utah Annual Report on Homelessness 2021, 14
What has worked so well in the past can work for us now. The Housing First initiative
was extremely successful in reducing chronic homelessness, and is an example of what can be
done to help the rest of Utah’s homeless population. If we implement the same tactics at a larger
scale, we will see a reduction in homelessness. Too often do ordinary people at the bottom of the
socio-economic ladder fall out due to circumstances beyond their control. Those living paycheck
to paycheck suddenly confronted with large hospital bills or other expensive accidents, single
mothers who lose their jobs, young adults who fall in with the wrong crowd. These people will
usually get back on their feet within 65 days, but there are many that don’t. Homeless shelters
are great at what they do, but there just aren’t enough beds. If these people who fall down were
allowed to live in affordable housing long enough to get their lives back together, the number of
homeless individuals would drop. According to the State of Utah Strategic Plan on
Homelessness, the number one need that is not being met is affordable housing.
In the long term, creating temporary and affordable housing will be less expensive to the
state than what is happening currently. The average homeless person costs the state far more than
one might think, between unpaid emergency room visits and jail time the annual cost per person
can rise into the tens of thousands. Providing housing is simply cheaper. With strict requirements
for qualification, time limits, and rent obligations we can reduce any abuse of the system. It is
widely known that drug abuse is rampant among the homeless population. Perhaps to qualify for
the housing program, the candidate must be clean from any substances or be entered into a
rehabilitation program. There will also be those who will not be able to ever participate fully in
society due to mental or physical challenges beyond their control. It is an unfortunate reality, but
placing them into housing where these issues can be managed will be cheaper than the inevitable
hospital bills, jail time, and shelters. Change is possible, so let our voices be heard by our state
representatives. When given the opportunity, vote for bills and proposals to assist Utah’s
homeless population. Advocate to your local government for additional homeless support.
Works Cited
Graham, Karen. “Utah’s Answer to Chronic Homelessness? Give Them a Place to Live.” Digital
homelessness-give-them-a-place-to-live/article/432465.
McEvers, Kelly. “Utah Reduced Chronic Homelessness By 91 Percent; Here’s How.” NPR, 10
homelessness-by-91-percent-heres-how
State of Utah Annual Report on Homelessness 2021. Workforce Services Homeless Services,
2021.