Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SQC – 1 “Quality Control for Firms that Perform Audits & Reviews of Historical Financial Information, and Other
Assurance & Related Services Engagements”
All firms to have system of quality control that provides reasonable assurance that: (a) Firm & personnel comply with professional standards,
regulatory & legal requirements, and (b) Reports issued by firm or partners are appropriate in the circumstances.
(a) To obtain reasonable assurance about whether the F. S. as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, thereby enabling the
auditor to express an opinion on whether the F.S. are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with an applicable FRF.
(b) To report on the F.S. and communicate as required by the SAs, in accordance with the auditor’s findings.
Objective of Auditor: To accept or continue an audit engagement only when the basis upon which it is to be performed has been agreed with the client.
Initial audit Engagement Recurring Audit Mngt. request for changes in terms
Limitations Imposed by mngt. No Limitations Imposed by Mngt. Determine its effect on Level of
Determine requirements w.r.t.:
Assurance & reasonable
(a) Revision of terms of Engagement; &
Do not accept unless required Ascertain existence of Preconditions Justification
by law (b) Remind the entity of existing terms
Preconditions for an audit Exist Not Exist Required Not Required Auditor Satisfied Not Satisfied
1. Determine whether the FRF is
acceptable.
2. Obtain agreement of mngt that it Accept Audit Discuss matter Send New No Further Duty Record New Do not
with Mngt. Engagement Letter Terms in accept the
understands its responsibilities for:
Engagement changes
(a) Preparation of F.S. Letter
(b) Exercising necessary Internal
Controls to enable the Do not accept audit in case of: CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING REVISION IN TERMS Mngt. not
preparation of F.S. that are free • Indications that the entity misunderstands the objective and permit the
(a) Unacceptable FRF
from material misstatements. scope of the audit. auditor to
or • Revised or special terms of engagement.
(c) To provide the auditor: continue
• Access to all relevant info. (b) Mngt. does not agree with • Recent change of senior management.
• Significant change in ownership. Withdraw &
• Additional info that auditor responsibilities
• Significant change in nature or size of the entity’s business. Report to
requests from mngt.
• Change in legal or regulatory requirements. appropriate
• Unrestricted access to persons
Compiled by: Pankaj Garg for • Change in FRF adopted in the preparation of the F.S. authority
within the entity.
students of CA - Final Audit • A change in other reporting requirements.
Objective: Implement QC Policies that provide Reasonable Assurance that audit complies with professional standards and audit report issued is appropriate
General concepts Form, Content & Extent of Specific Documentation Retention Ownership
Documentation Period
• Documentation is the
Meaning: Record of: Auditor shall prepare audit documentation property of the
• Audit procedures performed that is sufficient to enable an experienced Compiled by:
7 Years from Auditor.
• Relevant audit evidence auditor to understand:
Pankaj Garg
• May at his discretion
date of Audit
obtained, & for students of
(a) NTE of the audit procedures; Report make portions of or
• Conclusions reached CA - Final
extracts from
(b) Results of audit procedures performed, Audit
Purpose: includes the following: documentation
& audit evidence obtained;
• Assist in Planning and available to client.
(c) Significant matters arising during the
performance of Audit. Documentation of Documentation of Documentation of
audit and the conclusions reached
• Direction, supervision & Discussion Departure from a matters arising after the
Review of work. thereon, significant professional
relevant requirement Date of Auditor’s Report
• To fix accountability. judgments made in the reaching those
• Record for future reference. conclusions.
• Significant • Reasons for the • Circumstance
• Quality control review and Factors affecting form, content & extent
Matters departure. encountered.
inspections 1. The size and complexity of the entity. Discussed with • Alternative • New or additional
• Conduct of external
2. The nature of the audit procedures to be Mngt. And procedures procedures
inspections.
performed. TCWG. performed. performed, audit
Nature documentation must 3. Identified RMM. • When and with evidence obtained,
provide for: 4. Significance of audit evidence obtained. whom the conclusions reached,
These Charts are
• Sufficient and appropriate 5. Nature & extent of exceptions identified. discussion took protected under and their effect on the
record of the basis for 6. Need to document a conclusion or the place. Copyright and for auditor’s report.
auditor’s report. basis for a conclusion not readily • How the auditor students use only. Any • When and by whom
determinable from the documentation of addresses the Commercial use of these the changes to audit
• Evidence that the audit was
inconsistency (if charts by anyone may documentation were
planned and performed in the work performed or audit evidence
any detected attract Consequences made and reviewed.
accordance with SAs & other obtained.
during under Copyright Act.
regulatory requirements. 7. The audit methodology and tools used.
discussion)
Meaning: Intentional Act involving use of deception to • Incentive or pressure to Commit Fraud: Primary responsibility To obtain reasonable assurance
for prevention & that F.S. as a whole are free from
obtain an unjust or illegal advantage. Arises when mngt is under pressure to material Misstatements.
achieve an unrealistic target. detection of fraud rests
Auditor is concerned with Fraud that causes • Perceived opportunity to do so: with Mngt and TCWG
Arises when an individual believes that Maintain an attitude of
Material Misstatement.
internal control can be overridden. To ensure prevention of Professional Skepticism
Misstatement may result from: • Rationalization to do so: fraud Mngt. must have a
A Fraudulent Financial Reporting Arises when an individual possesses an commitment to create a Circumstances indicate existence
1. Recording fictitious journal entries to attitude or character that allows them culture of honesty and of material Misstatement
manipulate operating results.
knowingly and intentionally to commit a
2. Inappropriate assumptions. Ethical behaviour.
3. Changing judgments to estimate account dishonest act.
balances. Consider whether such a
4. Omitting, advancing or delaying recognition of Risk associated for non-detection of material misstatements misstatement is an indication
events and transactions occurred during the of Fraud. If Fraud identified:
• Due to Inherent limitations there is always an unavoidable risk of material
year.
5. Concealing facts that affect the amount misstatement in F.S. due to Fraud.
recorded in F.S. • Risk of non-detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is Communicate to Mngt. &
6. Engaging in Complex Transactions that are higher than the risk of non-detecting one resulting from error. TCWG (also to Regulatory &
structured to misrepresent the financial • Risk of Material Misstatements due to Management Fraud is higher than Enforcement authorities, if
position or financial performance.
7. Altering records relating to significant due to Employee Fraud. required by Law)
transactions.
B Misappropriation of Assets Conditions or events which increases risk of fraud or error Auditor unable to complete
1. Embezzling receipts. 1. Discrepancies in Accounting Records: arises due to improper recording, the engagement.
2. Stealing physical assets. unauthorised transactions, last minute adjustments.
3. Causing an entity to pay for goods and services
2. Conflicting or missing evidences: missing documents, altered Consider the Possibility of
not received.
documents, non-availability of original documents, unexplained items etc. withdrawing.
4. Using entity assets for personal use.
3. Unusual relationship between auditor & mngt: undue time pressure,
Compiled by: Pankaj Garg for students of unusual delay in providing info, unwillingness to address weaknesses in IC. If withdraw:
4. Others: Mngt not allowing auditor to meet with TCWG, varied accounting • Discuss with Mngt & TCWG, &
. CA - Final Audit
• Report to appropriate persons
policies, frequent changes in accounting estimates.
TCWG: Persons with Determine the Matters to be communicated • Communication may be • Size, operating structure,
responsibility for appropriate Oral /written control environment, & legal
overseeing the (a) Auditor’s responsibilities in relation to F.S. Detail/Summarised structure of entity.
person to whom
Audit. Structured /Unstructured • In the case of an audit of
strategic directions & communication
(b) Planned scope & timing of audit • Should be in writing special purpose F.S., whether
obligations related to is to be made.
(c) Significant findings from audit w.r.t. the auditor also audits the
Accountability. when oral
• Accounting Policies entity’s general-purpose F. S.
Management: Person communication is not
• Accounting Estimates • Requirements of respective
with executive • F. S. Disclosures adequate. law specifying written
responsibility for • Significant difficulties encountered • Communication should communication with TCWG in
Compiled by:
during the audit. be on timely basis a prescribed form.
conduct of entity’s Pankaj Garg Examples of Significant difficulties
for students of 1. Significant delay in providing info • Expectations of TCWG,
operation
CA - Final 2. Unnecessarily brief time to complete including arrangements made
Audit the audit. Evaluate adequacy of for periodic meetings or
3. Extensive unexpected effort to obtain communication for the communications with the
SAAE. purpose of the audit. auditor.
• Determine the need to communicate with
4. Unavailability of Expected • The amount of ongoing
Governing body, if communicates with information. contact and dialogue the
subgroup. 5. Restriction imposed by management. If not adequate, evaluate
auditor has with TCWG.
• If all of TCWG are involved in managing the 6. Scope limitation imposed by its effect, on the auditor’s
• Significant changes in the
management assessment of the risks of
entity, and the matter has been membership of a governing
communicated with persons having material misstatement. body.
• Material weakness in I.C.
managerial responsibility, the matters need • Matters discuss with Mngt.
• Other significant Matters. These Charts are protected under Copyright and for students
not be communicated again to the same
use only. Any Commercial use of these charts by anyone may
persons in their governing role. (d) Statement w.r.t. compliance of ethical
attract Consequences under Copyright Act.
requirements regarding independence.
(a) Inability of I.C to prevent Identification of deficiencies in Communication of deficiencies in Internal Control
detect & correct misstatement; Internal Control
or
Mode of communication Content of communication
(b) Absence of control necessary
Determine whether on the basis of
to prevent, detect & correct
work done any deficiency in In writing
misstatements internal control is identified
A joint audit is an audit of F.S. of an entity by two or more auditors appointed with the objective of issuing the audit report. Such auditors
are described as joint auditors.
Audit Planning and Allocation of Work Responsibility of Joint Auditors Audit Conclusion and Reporting
1 Development of Audit Plan • In respect of audit work divided among the joint 1 Reporting Requirements
In developing the joint audit plan, joint auditors shall: auditors, each joint auditor shall be responsible • Joint auditors are required to issue
a. Identify division of audit areas and common audit areas only for the work allocated to such joint auditor common audit report.
amongst the joint auditors that define the scope of the work of including proper execution of the audit procedures. • However, in case of any disagreement with
each joint auditor; regard to the opinion or any matters to be
• All joint auditors shall be jointly & severally
b. Ascertain the reporting objectives of the engagement to plan covered by the audit report, they shall
responsible for:
the timing of the audit and the nature of the communications express their opinion in a separate audit
required; a. audit work which is not divided among the joint
report.
c. Consider & communicate among all joint auditors the factors auditors and is carried out by all joint auditors; • A joint auditor is not bound by the views
that, in their professional judgment, are significant in directing b. decisions taken by all the joint auditors under of the majority of the joint auditors
engagement team’s efforts; audit planning in respect of common audit regarding the opinion or matters to be
d. Consider the results of preliminary engagement activities. areas concerning the NTE of the audit covered in the audit report.
e. Ascertain the NTE of resources necessary to perform the procedures to be performed by each of the joint • In case of separate reports, the audit
engagement. auditors. report(s) issued by the joint auditor(s)
2 Allocation of Work c. matters which are brought to the notice of the shall make a reference to the separate
• Joint auditors should, by mutual discussion, divide the audit joint auditors by any one of them and on which audit report(s) issued by the other joint
work among themselves. there is an agreement among the joint auditors; auditor(s). Such reference shall be made
• The division of work would usually be in terms of audit of under the heading “Other Matter
d. examining that the F.S. of the entity comply
identifiable units or specified areas. Paragraph” as per SA 706.
with the requirements of the relevant statutes;
• In some cases, due to the nature of the business of the entity 2 Review of work by other joint auditor
e. presentation and disclosure of the F.S. as
under audit, such a division of work may not be possible. In • Each joint auditor is entitled to assume
such situations, the division of work may be with reference to required by the applicable FRF;
that the other joint auditors have carried
items of assets or liabilities or income or expenditure. f. ensuring that the audit report complies with out their part of the audit work and the
• Certain areas of work, owing to their importance or owing to the requirements of the relevant statutes, the work has actually been performed in
the nature of the work involved, would often not be divided applicable Standards on Auditing and the other accordance with the SAs.
and would be covered by all the joint auditors. relevant pronouncements issued by ICAI. • It is not necessary for a joint auditor to
Documentation of Work Allocated • It shall be the responsibility of each joint auditor to review the work performed by other joint
• The work allocation document shall be signed by all the joint determine the NTE of audit procedures to be auditors.
auditors & same shall be communicated to TCWG. applied in relation to the areas of work allocated to • Each joint auditor is entitled to assume
• Documentation of allocation of work helps in avoiding any said joint auditor. that the other joint auditors have brought
dispute or confusion which may arise among the joint auditors to said joint auditor’s notice any departure
• It is the individual responsibility of each joint
regarding the scope of work to be carried out by them. from applicable FRF or significant
auditor to study and evaluate the prevailing system
• Communication of allocation of work to the entity helps in observations that are relevant to their
avoiding any dispute or confusion which may arise between of internal control and assessment of risk relating responsibilities noticed in the course of
the entity and the joint auditors. to the areas of work allocated to said joint auditor. the audit.
1. To devote appropriate attention to (a) Procedures required by SA -220 w.r.t. Establishment of Audit Strategy Development of
important areas. continuous of Client relationship. Audit Plan.
2. Identify and Resolve potential (b) Evaluate compliance with Ethical so as to set the scope, timing &
problems on timely basis. direction of the audit
Requirements (SA-220) • NTE of RAP (SA-
3. Properly organized & managed Audit. Factors to be considered
(c) Understanding of terms of 315)
4. Assists selection of ET members with • Characteristics of Engagement.
Engagement (SA-210) • Reporting Objectives. • NTE of furthers
requisite capabilities and competence.
5. Co-ordination of work done by • Significant factors to direct ET Audit Procedures
efforts.
auditors of components and experts. Planning – A Continuous Process (SA-330)
• Result of Preliminary
6. Facilitating direction and supervision • Other Planned
Engagement Activities.
of Engagement team. Audit Procedure.
• NTE of Procedures to be
performed.
Planning is not a discrete phase of an audit but rather a continuous process. It begins shortly
CHANGES TO PLANNING DECISIONS
after completion of previous audit & continues until completion of current audit engagement.
• Auditor shall update & change overall audit strategy and audit
It includes consideration of timing of certain activities & audit procedures that need to be
plan as necessary during the course of the audit.
completed prior to performance of further audit procedures. E.g., planning includes the need to • Audit Strategy and Audit Plan may need to be modified as a result
consider, prior to the auditor’s identification and assessment of the RMM, such matters as: of unexpected events, changes in conditions, or the audit evidence
1. The analytical procedures to be applied as risk assessment procedures. Compiled by: obtained from the results of audit procedures.
• Based on the revised consideration of assessed risks, auditor
2. Obtaining a general understanding of the legal and regulatory framework. Pankaj Garg
for students of need to modify the NTE of further audit procedures. This may be
3. The determination of materiality.
CA - Final the case when information comes to the auditor’s attention that
4. The involvement of experts. Audit differs significantly from the information available when the
5. The performance of other risk assessment procedures. auditor planned the audit procedures.
Materiality is a subject of • The amount set by auditor at (a) Upon establishing the overall audit strategy, the auditor shall
professional judgment and • less than materiality for F.S as a whole determine the materiality for the F. S. as a whole.
discussion presented in FRF (b) Determine the materiality level for specific transactions for
• to reduce to an appropriately low level
which misstatements of lower amount be expected to influence
provides a reference to the auditor in • the probability that the aggregate of the
the economic decisions of users.
determining materiality. uncorrected & undetected misstatement (c) Determine performance materiality for purpose of assessing
If FRF does not include a discussion, • exceeds materiality for F. S. as a whole the RMM and determining the NTE of further audit procedures.
following can be referred:
(a) Misstatements including
omissions expected to influence Revision of Materiality Use of benchmark in determining Materiality
Procedures designed to evaluate the operating effectiveness of controls in preventing, Procedures designed to detect material misstatements at assertion level.
detecting or correcting material misstatements at assertion level. It comprises of:
a) Test of details (of classes of transactions, Account Balances and
Obtain audit evidences w.r.t. (a) Application of controls (b) Consistency of application Disclosures); &
(c) By whom & by what means they applied Compiled by: Pankaj Garg
b) Substantive Analytical Procedures for students of CA - Final
Evaluate the audit evidences Audit
• Obtain an The user auditor shall obtain an • User auditor shall evaluate the design and implementation of relevant controls of
understanding of understanding of how user entity uses the user entity that relate to the services provided by service organization.
nature & significance • User auditor shall determine whether a sufficient understanding of nature and
services of a service organization in the user
of service provided by significance of services provided by service organization and their effect on the
entity operation, including:
the S.O. and their user entity internal control relevant to the audit has been obtained.
(a) Nature of service provided by the S.O. and • If user auditor is unable to obtain a sufficient understanding from the user entity,
effect on the user’s
entity internal control significance of services to user entity. user auditor shall obtain that understanding from the following procedures:
(b) Nature and materiality of the transactions (a) Obtaining a Type 1 or Type 2 Report, if available.
relevant to the audit,
(b) Contacting the service organization, through the user entity.
sufficient to identify processed or financial reporting processes
(c) Visiting the service organization.
and assess the RMM. affected by service organizations.
(d) Using another auditor to perform procedures that will provide the
• To design and (c) Degree of interaction between activities of necessary information about the relevant controls at the S.O.
perform audit
S.O. and those of the user entity. • If a S.O. uses subservice organisation, the service auditor’s report may either
procedures
(d) The nature of relationship between user include or exclude the subservice organisation’s relevant control objectives
responsive to those
& related controls in the service organisation’s description of its system & in
risks. entity and the service organization.
the scope of service auditor’s engagement. These two methods of reporting
are known as the inclusive method and the carve-out method, respectively.
User Auditor: An auditor who audits and Reports on the financial • If Type 1 or Type 2 report excludes the controls at a subservice
statements of a user entity. organisation, and the services provided by the subservice organisation are
User Entity: An Entity that uses a service organization and whose financial relevant to the audit of the user entity’s financial statements, the user
statements are being audited. auditor is required to apply the requirements of this SA in respect of the
subservice organisation.
Type 1 Report: Report on the description and design of internal controls at
• Nature and extent of work to be performed by the user auditor regarding
a service organization for a specified date.
the services provided by a subservice organisation depend on the nature
Type 2 Report: Report on the description, design and operating and significance of those services to the user entity and the relevance of
effectiveness of controls at a service organisation for a specified period. those services to the audit.
Difference between Accumulate the misstatements other than those that clearly trivial
Meaning and Nature of Auditor’s duties when an information to be used as audit evidence Audit Procedures & Methods
Audit Evidence (A.E.) for obtaining audit evidence
Meaning of A.E. Information prepared using Information Procedures to obtain A.E. Methods to obtain A.E.
Information used by auditor (a) RAP 1. Inspection
work of Management Expert Produced by entity
(b) FAP (Responses): 2. Observation.
about whether changes in inventory between the count If management refuses to permit auditor to
regarding existence & condition by communicate with legal counsel / external legal
date and the date of the F.S. are properly recorded.
counsel refuses / auditor unable to collect SAAE
2 Auditor unable to attend Inventory Count by performing alternate procedures
(a) Attendance at physical inventory Make or observe some physical counts on an alternative
counting, unless impracticable, to: date, Modify Opinion in accordance with SA 705
Meaning & Type of E.C. External Confirmation Audit Procedures in Special Circumstances Limited use of –ve
Procedures Request
Mngt. refuses to allow the auditor to send request
Audit Evidence obtained as a direct written As it provides less
Determining the information to
response to auditor from 3rd Party in • Inquire the reasons persuasive evidence
be confirmed.
Paper/Electronic/Other form. • Evaluate the implications on RMM than the positive
Selecting the Appropriate Third • Perform Alternative Audit procedure. Confirmation request.
2 Types Party. • Refusal appears to • Communicate to
be unreasonable TCWG.
+ ve Request - ve request Designing the confirmation Circumstances in
request. • Unable to collect • Determine its effect
Request that 3rd Party Request that 3rd Party
which negative
respond directly to respond directly to audit evidence on Opinion
Sending the request including request may be used
auditor auditor
follow up. Responses to E.C. request as sole substantive
indicating whether it only if it disagrees
agrees or disagrees • Creates Doubt Obtain Further procedure:
With the info in request with the information in Factors to be considered while Evidences
• Low RMM.
or the request designing E.C. request: • Not Reliable Consider its effect on
providing requested • Population consists
• Assertions being addressed. NTE of other procedures
info. of large number of
• Specific identified RMM. • No Response Perform Alternative small, homogeneous
Areas where External Confirmation may be obtained: • Layout and presentation of procedure
(a) Bank balance & Other confirmation from account balances.
request.
bankers • Unable to collect Determine its effect on
• Expectation of low
• Prior Experience of audit.
(b) Account Receivable/Account Payable Balances evidence Opinion
• Method of Communication. exception rate.
(c) Stock Lying with Third Parties
• Exception occurs Investigate to determine • Auditor not aware
(d) Property Title Deed held by third parties • Management Authorization.
(e) Investments Purchased but delivery not taken. misstatement of circumstances
• Ability of confirming party to
(f) Loan from Lenders that 3rd party
provide the requested
(g) Terms of agreement or Transaction with Third Compiled by: Pankaj Garg for students of
information disregard request.
Parties CA - Final Audit
• Read most recent F.S. and auditor Obtain SAAE Evaluate the Unable to Contain material Inconsistency Modification remains
report thereon. effect of obtain SAAE misstatements not exists relevant & material for
• Obtain S.A. audit evidence w.r.t. modification properly or Current Period F.S.
existence of any material accounted / Changes not
misstatement by disclosed in properly
Compiled by:
➢ Determining correct b/f of prior current year F. S. accounted or
Pankaj Garg
period closing balance. for students of disclosed
➢ Determining application of CA - Final
appropriate accounting policies. w.r.t. Audit
Evaluation of financial information 1 Determine the suitability of particular substantive analytical procedures (SAPs)
Following factors requires consideration:
through analysis of relationships 1. SAPs more suitable to large volumes of transactions tending to be predictable over time.
2. But suitability of AP influenced by:
among both financial and non-financial data.
• Nature of assertion.
AND
• Auditor’s assessment of APs effectiveness to identify material misstatement.
also encompass such investigation as is necessary of
3. In some cases, unsophisticated predictive models may be useful.
identified fluctuations or relationships that are
inconsistent with other relevant information or that 4. Different types of APs provide different levels of assurance.
differ from expected values by a significant amount. 5. Particular SAP may be considered suitable when Tests of Details are performed on same assertion.
Analytical Procedures 2 Evaluate the reliability of data
Compiled by:
Following factors affects the reliability:
Pankaj Garg
Consideration of Consideration of • Source of the information available. for students of
Comparisons of relationships among
• Comparability of the information available. CA - Final
Financial Information
• Nature and relevance of the information available, and Audit
with comparable Elements of financial
information for prior information • Controls over the preparation of the information
periods. or 3 Develop an expectation of recorded amounts or ratios and evaluate whether the expectation is
or Financial information sufficiently precise to identify material misstatement.
with anticipated results and relevant non- 4 Determine the amount of any difference of recorded amounts from expected values that is
of the entity financial information.
acceptable without further investigation.
or
Auditor’s expectations 5 Investigating Results of Analytical Procedures
or If auditor identified fluctuations or relationships that are inconsistent with other relevant information
Similar industry or differ from expected values by a significant amount, the auditor shall investigate such differences by:
information. (a) Inquiring of management; and
(b) Performing other audit procedures as necessary in the circumstances.
Application of audit procedures to < Risk that auditor’s conclusion based on a sample may be different from 1 Sample design, size and selection of items
100 % of items within a population. the conclusion if the entire population were subjected to same audit (i) While designing, consider the purpose of
Types of Sampling procedure. the audit procedure and the
characteristics of the population.
(a) Statistical Sampling: An
(ii) Sample size should be sufficient to
approach to sampling that has the Compiled by:
Pankaj Garg reduce sampling risk to an acceptably
following characteristics: Test of Tests of details
for students of low level.
• Random selection of the controls (iii) Selection should be in such a way that
CA - Final
sample items; and Audit each sampling unit in the population has
a chance of selection.
• The use of probability
Controls are Material Affects audit 2 Perform audit procedures
theory to evaluate sample
misstatements does effectiveness and is (i) Perform audit procedures, appropriate
results, including more effective
to the purpose, on each item selected.
than they not exist when in more likely to lead to
measurement of sampling (ii) If the audit procedure is not applicable
actually are fact it does. an inappropriate to selected item, perform the procedure
risk.
audit opinion. on a replacement item.
(b) Non-Statistical Sampling: A
(iii) If the auditor is unable to apply designed
sampling approach that does not
audit procedures/alternative procedure
have characteristics of random Controls are Material Affects audit to a selected item, consider that item as
selection and use of probability efficiency as it would a deviation.
less effective misstatement exists
theory is considered non- than they when in fact it does lead to additional 3 Evaluation of results of audit sampling
statistical sampling. work to establish To determine whether the use of audit
actually are not
that initial sampling has provided a reasonable basis
conclusions were for conclusions about the population that
incorrect. has been tested.
Objective of Auditor: To obtain SAAE whether (a) AE including Fair Value AE are reasonable; and (b) related disclosures in the F.S. are adequate.
Compiled by:
Meaning & Nature of Auditor’s Duties
Pankaj Garg
Accounting Estimates for students of
CA - Final
Audit
• Accounting estimate: Risk Assessment Procedures & Responses to Assessed Risks
“An approximation of a monetary
Related Activities
amount in the absence of a Based on assessed RMM, auditor shall determine:
precise means of measurement”. • Whether management has appropriately applied the applicable FRF.
This term is used for an amount • Whether the methods are appropriate and have been applied consistently.
1. Obtain an understating of:
measured at fair value where
there is estimation uncertainty. → Requirements of applicable FRF
• Estimation Uncertainty: → How management identifies
transactions, events and General Responses to Specific Responses to Significant Estimation
The susceptibility of an
conditions that give rise to need Assessed RMM Uncertainties
accounting estimate & related
for accounting estimates. 1. Determine whether events 1. Evaluate the following:
disclosures to an inherent risk of
→ Estimation making process occurring up to date of • How management has considered
precision in its measurement.
adopted by mngt. and data on auditor’s report provide alternative assumptions or outcomes,
• Examples of Accounting Estimates
which they are based. audit evidence regarding • How management has addressed
→ Provision for Bad Debt,
Estimation making process AE. estimation uncertainty in making the
→ Inventory loss,
• Methods/Model used in making 2. Test how management accounting estimate.
→ Warranty Obligations,
Accounting estimates. made the accounting • Whether the significant assumptions
→ Depreciation,
→ Provision against carrying • Relevant Controls estimate and the data on used by management are reasonable.
amount of investments, etc. • Use of Management Expert. which it is based. • Management’s intent to carry out
• Examples of Fair Value A.E. • Changes in the methods from 3. Test the operating specific courses of action and its ability
→ Share Based Payments, the prior period along with effectiveness of the to do so.
→ Assets held for disposal, reasons. controls. 2. If in auditor’s judgment, management has
• Assessment of effect of 4. Develop a point estimate not adequately addressed the effects of
→ Financial Instruments,
estimation uncertainties. or a range to evaluate estimation uncertainty, the auditor shall
→ Assets acquired in business
2. Review of outcome of accounting management’s point develop a range with which to evaluate the
combinations
estimates of prior period. estimate. reasonableness of the accounting estimates.
Auditor’s Duties
Events occurring between the date of F.S. and the date of Auditor’s report Facts that become known to Auditor after date of Auditor’s report
(i) Perform procedures to obtain SAAE that all events which require adjustment / Before issue of F.S. After issue of F.S.
disclosure have been identified. 1. In general Auditor has no obligation. 1. In general Auditor has no
2. However, in case of significant obligation.
(ii) For the purpose of determining nature and timing of procedures, auditor may:
matter 2. However, in case of significant
(a) Obtain the understanding of procedures applied by management for matter
• Discuss with Management
identification of significant events. • Discuss with Management
• Determine need to amend F.S.
(b) Inquire the Management as to Occurrence of subsequent events which may • Determine need to amend F.S.
• Inquire how mngt intends to • Inquire how mngt intends to
affect the F.S. address the matter in F.S. address the matter in F.S.
(c) Read the Minutes of Meetings that held after the B/S date. 3. If Mngt. amend the F.S. auditor shall 3. If Mngt. amend F.S. auditor shall
(d) Study the Interim Financial Statements, if any. • extend procedures to date of new • Carry out procedures on
(iii) If auditor identifies any event which require any adjustment/disclosure, he should report, and amended F.S.
ensure its appropriate treatment in F.S. • provide a new auditor report on • Review the steps taken by mngt
amended F.S. to ensure that recipient of F.S.
(iv) Obtain a WR from the Management that all known events have been appropriately are informed of the situation.
adjusted/disclosed, as the case may be. or
• provide a new auditor report on
• amend the audit report to amended F.S.
Specific Inquiries to be made from management include an additional date or
1. Whether new commitments, borrowings or guarantees have been entered into. restricted to that amendment • Amend the audit report to
2. Whether sales or acquisitions of assets have occurred or are planned. and include an EOM/OMP. include an additional date
3. Whether there have been increases in capital or issuance of debt instruments. 4. If mngt refuses to amend the F.S. restricted to that amendment
• Modify the report if not yet and include an EOM/OMP.
4. Whether any assets have been appropriated by government or destroyed.
provided to entity. 4. If mngt refuses to amend the F.S.
5. Whether there have been any developments regarding contingencies.
• Notify to mngt and TCWG, that
6. Whether any unusual accounting adjustments have been made. • If report already issued, notify to
the auditor will seek to prevent
7. Whether any events have occurred that will bring into question the appropriateness mngt and TCWG not to issue F.S.
reliance on Auditor’s Report.
of accounting policies used in the F.S. to third parties. • If mngt/TCWG does not take
8. Whether any events have occurred that are relevant to the measurement of • If mngt still issues F.S., take necessary steps, take
estimates or provisions made in the F.S. appropriate action to prevent appropriate action to prevent
9. Whether any events have occurred that are relevant to the recoverability of assets. reliance on auditor’s report. reliance on auditor’s report.
A written statement by Matters for which WR may be obtained Auditor Responses in different Situations
Management
• Date of WR shall be as near as 2 Where auditor determines that it Act. over integrity of
practicable to the date of the is necessary to obtain one or more management, issue a
Auditor’s report. WR. disclaimer of opinion.
1. Consider the professional competence of Other 1. Components whose FS are 1. Sufficient liaison/co- 1. Express a qualified /
Auditor, if Other Auditor is not a member of ICAI. audited by Other Auditor ordination between Principal disclaimer of opinion
2. Visit component and examine books of account, if and Other auditor. because of scope
and their significance to
essential. limitation:
2. Principal auditor may require
the financial information • If Principal Auditor
3. Obtain sufficient appropriate evidence, that work of Other Auditor to answer a
Other Auditor is adequate for Principal Auditor's of the entity as a whole. concludes that he
detailed questionnaire.
purposes. 2. Names of the other cannot use the work of
3. Other Auditor should
4. Discuss audit procedures applied by Other Auditor. auditors. Other Auditor;
coordinate with Principal
5. Review a written summary of Other Auditor’s 3. Any conclusions reached • PA unable to perform
Auditor:
procedures and findings through sufficient additional
that individual • Adhering to time-table.
questionnaires/checklist. procedures regarding
components are not • Bringing to the attention of
6. Consider significant findings of Other Auditor: Financial information
material. PA any significant finding.
• Discuss audit findings with OA and Management of of the component
component. 4. Procedures performed • Compliance with relevant
audited by OA.
• Perform supplemental tests if necessary. regarding components. statutory requirements.
2. Report should state
7. In case Other Auditor is not a professionally qualified 5. Conclusions reached. • Respond to detailed
clearly division of
auditor - for instance, where a component is situated in questionnaire.
6. Manner of dealing with responsibility
foreign country: Modified Report of Other between PA and OA.
• Procedures mentioned above assume added These Charts are protected under Copyright and for students use
Auditor while finalising
importance. only. Any Commercial use of these charts by anyone may attract
Principal Auditor’s Report. Consequences under Copyright Act.
Meaning & scope of External Auditor’s Procedures w.r.t. Evaluation of Internal Using Direct Assistance (DA) of Internal Auditors (IA)
Meaning of Auditor’s Expert Procedures to be followed while using the work of auditor’s expert
• An individual or organisation 1 Determining need for an Auditor’s Expert 4 Agreement with Auditor’s Expert
• possessing expertise in field An auditor’s expert may be needed to assist the auditor for the Need to be in writing and cover the followings:
followings: • Nature, scope and Objectives of Auditor’s Expert
other than accounting/auditing,
• Obtaining an understanding of entity & its environment, including IC. work.
• whose work is used by the • Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement. • Respective Role and Responsibilities of Auditor
auditor • Determining & implementing overall responses to assessed risks. and auditor’s Expert.
• to assist the auditor in obtaining • Designing and performing further audit procedures to respond to • NTE of Communication including form of report.
SAAE. assessed risks. • Confidentiality requirements to be observed by
• Evaluating the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence
Auditor’s Expert.
obtained.
Areas where work of AE can be
2 Evaluate Competence, Capability and Objectivity of the Expert 5 Evaluate appropriateness of Expert work
used
Source of Information for evaluation: • Finding & Conclusion – Relevance,
• Personal Experience with previous work.
Reasonableness & Consistency with other A.E.
• Valuation of complex financial • Discussion with that expert.
• Discussion with other Auditors.
• Assumptions and Methods – Relevance and
instruments, L & B, P & M, jewellery,
• Knowledge of expert’s qualification, memberships, other forms of Reasonableness.
works of art, antiques, intangible
recognitions. • Source Data – Relevance, Completeness and
assets, assets acquired and
• Published books or papers.
liabilities assumed in business accuracy.
• Auditor’s firm Q. C. Policies and Procedures.
combinations and assets that may 3 Obtain an understating of expert work 6 Expert work not adequate for audit purposes
have been impaired. • To enable the auditor to determine the nature, scope and • If Auditor concludes that work of auditor’s expert is
• Actuarial calculation of liabilities objectives of that expert’s work for auditor’s purposes. not adequate for the auditor’s purposes and
associated with insurance contracts • Evaluate the adequacy of that work for the auditor’s • auditor cannot resolve the matter through the
or employee benefit plans. additional audit procedures,
purposes.
• it may be necessary to express a modified opinion.
• Estimation of oil and gas reserves.
• Valuation of environmental
liabilities, and site clean-up costs. Reference to the Auditor’s Expert in the Auditor’s Report
• Interpretation of contracts, laws
• No reference required in case of unmodified Audit Report unless required by L & R.
and regulations.
• Analysis of complex or unusual tax • In case of modified reports, it may be appropriate to refer to the auditor’s expert, to explain the nature of the modification. In
compliance issues. such case, auditor may need the permission of the auditor’s expert before making such a reference.
Reports in which auditor 1 Title “Independent Auditor’s Report” – so as to distinguish from reports 1. State the objective of auditor to
issued by others. obtain reasonable assurance that F.S.
expresses his opinion on financial as a whole are free from material
2 Addressee Auditor’s Report shall be addressed as appropriate. Generally, it is
statements. addressed to those for whom it is prepared. misstatements & issue the auditor’s
3 Opinion Section Fair In our opinion, the F.S. present fairly in all material report that includes an auditor’s
• For General purpose F.S. – SA
Meaning
B.1.1 – Qualified Opinion 7 Management • To prepare F.S. in accordance with applicable FRF.
reasonableness of accounting
Responsibilities • Maintenance of adequate records for safeguarding of assets and
B.1.2 – Adverse Opinion estimates.
for the F.S. prevention and detection of fraud.
• Conclude on appropriateness of
B.1.3 – Disclaimer of Opinion • Making reasonable and prudent judgments and estimates.
management use of Going Concern
• Design, Implementation and maintenance of Internal Control.
Details of B.1 is dealt by SA 705. basis of accounting.
• Assessing the appropriateness of Going Concern basis of accounting.
• Evaluate overall presentation,
B.2 – Matters that do not affect • Overseeing the financial reporting process. structure & content of F.S.
Audit opinion 8 Auditor’s responsibilities for the Audit of F.S. 5. State Auditor’s responsibilities w.r.t.:
9 Other • Heading: “Reporting on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements”. • Matters communicated to TCWG.
B.2.1 – With EOM Para Reporting • Will include reporting of CARO, 2016, reporting u/s 143(3) of • Providing statement to TCWG on
B.2.1 – With OM Para responsibilities Companies Act, 2013, Rule 11 of CAAR, 2014. compliance of Ethical
10 Signature In personal name and name of firm, along with the membership number requirements.
Details of B.2 is dealt by SA 706. and firm registration number. • Determining Key Audit matters out
11 Place The city where audit report is signed. of matters communicated to
12 Date It should not be earlier than date on which audit evidences are collected. TCWG.
• SA 701 applies to audit of complete set of Key audit Matters are to be determined from the • Law or regulation precludes public
general-purpose financial statements of matters communicated to TCWG, Considering the disclosure about the matter; or.
listed entities and circumstances when • Audit determines that the matter should not
following:
auditor decides to communicate key audit
(a) Areas of higher assessed RMM. be communicated in the auditor’s report
matter in the auditor’s report.
• SA 705 prohibits the auditor from (b) Significant auditor judgment relating to financial because the adverse consequences of doing
communicating key audit matters when the statement that involved management judgment so would reasonably be expected to
auditor disclaims the opinion on the outweigh the public interest benefit of such
for Ex. Accounting estimates having high
financial statements. communication.
estimation uncertainty.
• It will not be applied if entity has publicly
(c) Effect of significant event or transactions
Meaning and Purpose of Key Audit Matters disclosed information about the matter.
occurred during the year.
Meaning: Those matters that in the auditor’s Modified opinion Vs. Going concern Vs. Key
Manner of Reporting
judgment were of most significance in
Audit Matters
audit of financial statement of current
period.
• Use separate section titled as “Key audit Matter’s.” • Key audit matter is not a substitute for modified
These are selected from matters
communicated with TCWG. • Use introductory language in this section as – “Key opinion under SA 705 or reporting required
Purpose: audit Matters are those matters that in the under SA 570 w.r.t. existence of material
(a) To enhance the communicative value of the auditor’s judgment, were of most significance in uncertainty as to events that cast significant
auditor’s report by providing greater the audit of financial statements of current period doubt on an entity ability to continue as Going
transparency. and these matters were addressed in the context Concern.
(b) To provide additional information to intended
of audit of financial statements as a whole and • Auditor shall report modification / Going
users of F.S. to assist them in understating those
matters that in auditor’s judgment were of most auditor does not provide a separate opinion on concern in accordance with applicable SA, and
significance. these matters”. include a reference to basis for Qualified
(c) To assist intended users in understanding the • Description of each key audit matter shall follow (Adverse) opinion or the material ascertaining
entity & areas of significant management the introduction. related to going concern section in the Key
judgment. • Description of key audit matter shall address the Audit Matters Section.
(d) To provide a basis to further engage with
reason why the matter was considered as key
management and TCWG about certain matters
relating to the entity. audit matter.
Issued when: Opinion Section Basis for Opinion Section Auditor’s Responsibility Section
F.S. are misstated having material
but not pervasive effect. Use the heading – Amend the heading – Basis for Qualified Opinion When an auditor disclaims the
• Qualified Opinion Basis for Adverse Opinion opinion, the auditor shall
Or • Adverse Opinion Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion.
Qualified
Auditor not been able to collect • Disclaimer of Opinion. • Include a description of matter giving rise to amend the description of
Wordings of Opinion: modification. auditor’s responsibilities to
sufficient appropriate audit
Except for the effects of
Cause of Description include only the following:
evidence for transactions that are matters prescribed in “Basis
Modification
having material but not pervasive of Qualified Opinion” • Statement that the auditor’s
Qualified
section, the F.S. have been Material • Description of Misstatement.
effect. Misstatement responsibility is to conduct
prescribed fairly in all • Quantification of financial
Issued when F.S. are misstated material respects in in Amount effect, if determinable. an audit in accordance with
• If not determinable, state the
Adverse
having material and pervasive accordance with [applicable Standard on Auditing and to
FRF] fact.
effect. issue Auditor’s Report.
In auditor’s opinion, Material Explanation how the
Misstatement in
because of significance of disclosures are misstated. • Statement that because of
Issued when auditor not been able Disclosure
the matters described in Material Describe nature of omitted significance of matters
to collect sufficient appropriate
Adverse
Disclaimer
1 Meaning 1 Meaning
A Para included in the Auditor’s report that refers to a matter appropriately A Para included in Auditors Report that refers to a matter other
reflected/ disclosed in the financial statement that in the auditor’s judgment is of than presented/ disclosed in financial statement that in the
such significance that it is fundamental to the user’s understanding of financial auditor’s judgment is relevant for users understanding of audit
statement. auditor’s responsibilities or auditor’s report.
2 Requirements 2 Requirements
• EOM Para is not a substitute of Key Audit Matter or Modified Opinion. • OM Para is not a substitute of Key Audit Matter.
• EOM should be included within a separate section titled as “Emphasis of • OM Para should be included in the audit report in a separate
Matter”. section termed as “Other Matter”.
• EOM should refer only to information presented/disclosed in the financial • Differentiate “Other Matter” with Key Audit Matter”.
statements. 3 Location in Audit Reports
• It must be indicated that auditor’s opinion is not modified in respect of this • Immediately after the “Key Audit Matter” section.
matter. • If other matter is related with other legal and regulatory
3 Circumstance when EOM Para can be issued requirements, it needs to be placed in “Reporting on other
(a) Uncertain situation as to future outcome of an exceptional litigation. legal and Regulatory requirements” Section.
(b) Significant subsequent events.
(c) Early application of new AS in advance of its effective date.
(d) Occurrence of major catastrophe that may have a significant effect on entity
financial position. These Charts are protected under Copyright and for students use
4 Location in Audit Reports only. Any Commercial use of these charts by anyone may attract
Consequences under Copyright Act.
Immediately following the “Basis of Opinion Section”.
1 Obtaining the Other Information 1 When a Material Inconsistency Appears to Exist or Other Information • The auditor’s report shall include a separate
Appears to Be Materially Misstated section with a heading “Other Information”, when,
The auditor shall: at the date of the auditor’s report:
If the auditor identifies that a material inconsistency appears to exist (or becomes
(a) Determine, through discussion with mngt, (a) For an audit of F.S. of a listed entity, the
aware that the other information appears to be materially misstated), the auditor
which documents comprises the annual shall discuss the matter with management and, if necessary, perform other auditor has obtained, or expects to obtain,
report, and the entity’s planned manner and procedures to conclude whether: other information; or
(a) A material misstatement of the other information exists; (b) For an audit of F.S. of an unlisted corporate
timing of the issuance of such documents; entity, the auditor has obtained some or all of
(b) A material misstatement of the F.S. exists; or
(b) Make appropriate arrangements with the other information.
(c) The auditor’s understanding of the entity and its environment needs to be
management to obtain in a timely manner updated. • When the auditor’s report is required to include an
and, if possible, prior to the date of the 2 When the Auditor Concludes That a Material Misstatement of the Other Other Information section, it shall include:
(a) A statement that mngt. is responsible for the
auditor’s report, the final version of the Information Exists
other information;
documents comprising the annual report; & • If auditor concludes that a material misstatement of the other information
(b) An identification of:
exists, he shall request mngt to correct other information. If management:
(c) When some or all of the documents (i) Other information, if any, obtained by the
(a) Agrees to make the correction, the auditor shall determine that the
determined above will not be available until auditor prior to the date of the auditor’s
correction has been made; or
after the date of the auditor’s report, request report; and
(b) Refuses to make the correction, the auditor shall communicate the
(ii) For an audit of F.S. of a listed entity, other
management to provide a WR that the final matter with TCWG and request that the correction be made.
information, if any, expected to be
version of the documents will be provided • If the auditor concludes that a material misstatement exists in other
obtained after the date of the auditor’s
information obtained prior to the date of the auditor’s report, and the other
to the auditor when available, and prior to report;
information is not corrected after communicating with TCWG, the auditor
its issuance by the entity, such that the (c) A statement that the auditor’s opinion does
shall take appropriate action, including:
not cover the other information and,
auditor can complete the procedures (a) Considering the implications for the auditor’s report and communicating
accordingly, that the auditor does not express
required by this SA. with TCWG about how the auditor plans to address the material
an audit opinion;
misstatement in the auditor’s report,
2 Reading & Considering the Other information (d) A description of the auditor’s responsibilities
(b) Withdrawing from the engagement, where withdrawal is possible under
relating to reading, considering and reporting
The auditor shall read the other information & applicable law or regulation.
on other information as required by this SA;
consider • If the auditor concludes that a material misstatement exists in other
and
(a) whether there is a material inconsistency information obtained after the date of the auditor’s report, the auditor shall:
(e) When other information has been obtained
(a) If the other information is corrected, perform the procedures
between the other information & the F.S., & prior to the date of the auditor’s report, either:
necessary in the circumstances; or
(b) whether there is a material inconsistency (i) A statement that the auditor has nothing
(b) If the other information is not corrected after communicating with
to report; or
between the other information and the TCWG, take appropriate action considering the auditor’s legal rights
(ii) If the auditor has concluded that there is
auditor’s knowledge obtained in the audit, in and obligations, to seek to have the uncorrected material misstatement
an uncorrected material misstatement of
appropriately brought to the attention of users for whom the auditor’s
the context of audit evidence obtained and report is prepared.
the other information, a statement that
conclusions reached in the audit. describes the uncorrected material
3 When a Material Misstatement in the Financial Statements Exists or the misstatement of the other information.
While reading the other information, the auditor Auditor’s Understanding of the Entity and Its Environment Needs to Be
• When the auditor expresses a qualified or adverse
shall remain alert for indications that the other Updated
opinion in accordance with SA 705, the auditor
information not related to the F.S. or the If, as a result of performing the procedures, the auditor concludes that a material shall consider the implications of the matter giving
misstatement in the F.S. exists or the auditor’s understanding of the entity and its rise to the modification of opinion for the
auditor’s knowledge obtained in the audit environment needs to be updated, the auditor shall respond appropriately in statement required in above para.
appears to be materially misstated. accordance with the other SAs.