Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What to expect: A true/ false, multiple choice questions, short answer questions, one case study.
What to bring: a pencil (or two) and a calculator
Medical Terminology: Units 1-4
Explain why the Academy transitioned to the NCP and standardized terminology
o Wanted to establish a universal language between all healthcare practitioners
Give an example of what could happen if the RDN does not utilize critical thinking skills during the
nutrition assessment
o The dietitian could give a miss diagnosis or completely not know the diagnosis and the
patient would go untreated and continue living with a problem.
Nutrition Screening
Describe the purpose of nutrition screening.
o Determine nutrition risk in patients
o Compare and contrast methods used for assessing food and nutrient intake. Describe pros,
cons, and situations in which each method would be most appropriate.
The 24-hour food recall can be good to quickly assess a patient’s food intake
But it also just shows you one day out of all days
The food frequency questionnaire gives you a better idea of what people eat
normally
People can lie during both these forms of getting diet intake
o Explain where you would obtain information related to food/ drug interactions.
Acute Care Hospitals
Ambulatory Clinics
Emergency Rooms
Short Stay Units
Long-term care facilities
Rehab Facilities
Home Care
Anthropometric Measurements
o List the measurements obtained for populations (adult vs. pediatric).
Adult: Height, Weight, Waist Circumference, Body Fat Distribution, Body
Composition,
o Anthropometric calculations (i.e. BMI, IBW, %IBW, %UBW, %Wt. Loss).
IBW
Males: 106 lbs + 6 lbs/inch over 5 ft.
Females: 100 lbs + 5 lbs/inch over 5 ft.
% IBW = (Current wt./IBW) x 100
%UBW = (current/UBW) x 100
BMI: wt in kg/ht in m^2
Underweight: <18.5,
18.5-24.9: normal
25-29.9: overweight
30-34.9: obesity 1
35-39.9: obesity 2
40+: extreme obesity
%Wt. loss = UBW – (current weight/UBW) x 100
o Know classifications for severe weight loss in acute illness or injury.
5% “significant” >5% “Severe” in 1 month
7.5% ‘significant >7.5% ‘severe’ in 3 months
10% ‘significant >10% ‘severe’ in 6 months
Client History
o List the information under this domain
Personal History
Medical/health /family history
Social history
Treatments/therapy
Medications
Surgeries
Comparative Standards (listed as “Assessment, monitoring and evaluation tools in the Snapshot)
o Estimate energy needs using a predictive equation.
Noncritically ill: Mifflin-St. Jeor Equation
Men: RMR = (9.99W) + (6.25H) – (4.92A) + 5
Women: RMR = (9.99W) + (6.25H) – (4.92A) -161
Critically ill: Penn State equation (nonobese and obese <60 yrs)
RMR = [(BMR x 0.96) x (VE x 31)] + (Tmax x 167) – 6212
Critically ill: Penn State equation (obese >60 yrs)
RMR = [(BMR x 0.71) x (VE x 64)] + (Tmax x 85) – 3085
o Estimate protein needs.
1.2 g protein / kg actual body weight
DRi: 0.8g/kg
Adult maintenance: 0.8-1.0 g/kg
Older adults: 1.0 g/kg
Renal Disease
Pre-dialysis: 0.6-0.8 g/kg
Hemodialysis: 1.2-1.3 g/kg
Peritoneal dialysis: >1.3 g/kg
Hepatitis: 1-1.5 g/kg
Cancer: 1-1.5 g/kg
Pulmonary disease: 1.2-1.5 g/kg
BMI: >27, 1.5-2 g/kg IBW
o Interviewing
o List and describe possible barriers to communication
The participant is uncomfortable
The participant won’t answer the questions completely
The interviewer is talking too much
Both parts aren’t actively listening
o Identify types of communication styles that promote a supportive environment (i.e.
descriptive rather than evaluative)
Descriptive
Support situation rather than reprimand the problem
Problem oriented
Address problem and ask why the problem is occurring
Provisional
Being polite and professional
Egalitarian
Getting on same level as client/being supportive
Empathetic
Help to understand the situation/’feel for’ the person
o Know the parts of an interview and components of each
Opening
Introductions- nature and purpose of interview
Sets tone
Set time frame
Establish rapport
Discuss purpose
Exploration
Gather information
Explore problems
Explore thoughts and feelings
Continue rapport
Closing
Express appreciation
Review purpose
Ask for comments/questions
Plan future contacts
o Be familiar with question types (open, closed, etc.) and the various types of responses
(hostile, reassuring, etc.)
Open
Less threatening
Less efficient
Closed
‘yes’ or ‘no’ restrictive
Interviewer has more control
Takes less time
Primary
Introduces topics or new discussion
Secondary
Follow-up
Get more info
Show that you are listening
Neutral
Doesn’t suggest an answer
Leading
Direct the respondent toward one answer
Understanding
Understand and recreate the message in your own frame of reference
Probing
Clarify or gain additional information
Confrontation
Authority-laden; tactfully call attention to inconsistency
Evaluate
Makes a judgement about feelings or response s
Hostile
Anger or frustration; leads to antagonism or humiliation
Reassuring
Prevent client form working through feelings; ‘it’s okay’