Professional Documents
Culture Documents
the legacies of the past and its burdens on the present, the radically
provisional or divided nature of the self, the construction of peoples or
individuals as monstrous or ‘other’, the preoccupation with bodies that are
modified, grotesque or diseased.1
1
Gothic Studies 21 (2019)
2
Introduction
the origins of language and society, stem from the eighteenth century,
when Gothic itself as a genre was born; wildness and the boundaries of
language are truly Gothic themes.
One of the ways Gothic as a genre has mutated in recent years has
been through its encounter with romantic fiction to create a new form,
paranormal romance, which features the sympathetic monster – vam-
pires, notably, but also subsequently other creatures, including were-
wolves. The twenty-first-century werewolf is thus more humanised,
and this assimilation of otherness, correlated with shifts in social
attitudes towards minority groups, colours contemporary werewolf
narratives. Alongside this has been a certain feminisation of the
werewolf, with women in urban fantasy and paranormal romance often
appearing as the werewolf protagonists.10 The particular essence of the
werewolf as animality irrupting into humanity makes them especially
suited to explore concerns about nature and wildness, aligning them
with the recent development of eco-Gothic as a distinct perspective
within Gothic studies.11 Our contributors each respond to these
new emphases on wildness and the werewolf in various and thought-
provoking ways.
In our first essay, Sue Chaplin discusses the monstrous lover in
paranormal romance and points to an important trope – the absence of
the father. This is especially prominent in werewolf fictions, where
the pack leader is associated with the father. Chaplin shows that, as in the
original folklore and in foundational Gothic texts such as Dracula, the
vampire of paranormal romance is never far from the werewolf, and some
of the ideas about pack society and biological determinism may apply
to both. In these narratives, the woman is often vulnerable and also
prone to self-sacrifice in order to redeem the monstrous male. Chaplin
calls upon René Girard’s theory, which ties sacrifice to marriage, to
elucidate her argument. She qualifies this, however, through the feminist
philosophy of Irigaray and through William Beers and Juliet MacCannell
and their work respectively on male bonding and the replacement of the
father’s authority by that of the brothers.
The masochistic violence in Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight (2005) has
stirred up much controversy. Bella Swan acts the role of sacrificial victim.
It is commonplace to critique this as patriarchal. What Chaplin argues is
that Meyer and many other writers in this genre treat patriarchy as a
nostalgic reversion. In Twilight, the power of the father is reduced, in
Bella’s own family, but also in the werewolf pack she becomes involved
with. The werewolves are opposed to the vampire Cullen family in ways
that – as others have noted – take on racial tones. Yet Chaplin points out
how closely vampire and werewolf are aligned, too, as in the folkloric
3
Gothic Studies 21 (2019)
tradition they come from and how they become reconciled in fraternal
unity through Bella’s sacrifice.
Many paranormal romances are more radical in treating masculine
identity. Chaplin looks at Lara Adrian’s Midnight Breed (2007–18) and
J. R. Ward’s Black Dagger Brotherhood (2005–18) series. The vampires
here are hypermasculine heroes and, again, there is a close affinity
with the werewolf – particularly in the biologically determined nature
of their aggressive maleness and as pack animals. Yet Chaplin argues
that these novels work against the ideology of innate male violence that
rests on parallels with the wolf. They affirm the fantasy that yearns for
the protective male, yet ideologies of male sexual power are very often
challenged.
Tania Evans also addresses masculinity, this time in paranormal
romance for young adult readers. The violence and emotional repression
associated with dominant manifestations of masculinity is problematised
through the werewolf figure. Non-realist genre conventions can reinforce
or subvert these norms: Evans examines Cassandra Clare’s The Mortal
Instruments (2007–14) and Meyer’s Twilight (2005–8) series. She
approaches masculinity in these texts through Judith Butler’s theory of
gender as performance rather than innate essence.
For Clare’s werewolf Jordan, the pack can serve as a means of alleviat-
ing the violence that is generated by emotional repression. Though
lycanthropy is explained as an infection, the healing effects of social
interaction through the pack shift the discourse away from the biological
determinism which characterises many werewolf fictions towards the idea
that masculinity is performative and a social phenomenon. Likewise, with
Jacob in the Twilight series, the transformation into wolf is associated
with the release of repressed violent emotions.
Evans goes on to dissect the specific nature of masculine violence
as domestic abuse, as represented in the relationship between Clare’s
Jordan and his girlfriend, Maia. The conventions of paranormal romance,
where there are love affairs between the now-assimilated monster and a
human (usually) female, tend to legitimise the violence. Evans argues that
the particularly sympathetic treatment of Jordan in the series further
tends to erase the violence. But, in turn, this violence is de-naturalised
and Jordan shown as responsible for his violence. A similar dialectic is
observed in the Twilight books, where domestic violence is seen as a
model of masculinity and yet is challenged and rendered open to critique.
Likewise, the power relationships are laid bare as conventional and not
innate, revealing implications for human society.
Simon Marsden takes up another way in which the sympathetic
werewolf can represent and question the violence of contemporary
4
Introduction
society. Benjamin Percy’s apocalyptic Red Moon (2013) shows the monster
post-9/11 as terrorist – or, at least, the imaginary potential terrorist threat
attributed to outsider groups. Werewolves, embodying otherness in
human shape, can stand in for the Islamist terrorist, who are marked
by signifiers of cultural difference and yet can infiltrate society invisibly.
Marsden shows how Percy’s novel questions the attribution of monstrosity
to the terrorist. The actual processes of stereotyping are exposed in this
novel. Marsden employs Hannah Arendt’s moral philosophy in the
Augustinian tradition, showing how the violence of both the terrorists
and their opponents is enabled by an ideology of stereotyping.
Marsden shows how the development of extreme ‘lycan’ terrorism in the
novel evokes the growth of Islamist terrorism and the interaction of that
with such state responses as violence, surveillance, and criminalisation in
post-9/11 USA. The discourses of both lycan terrorism and anti-werewolf
populism are exposed as essentialist and as avoiding moral responsibility.
Likewise, the violence of state, terrorist, and vigilante is challenged.
In this novel there is also a strand of paranormal romance, as love
affair between lycan and human. This does not identify the novel as
predominantly of that genre. But as in paranormal romance elsewhere,
the humanising of the monster in this genre/mode allows issues of
subjectivity and agency to be explored (as the articles by Chaplin and
Evans also illustrate). Marsden argues that Augustinian ideas of evil
and of love can illuminate the novel in this personal aspect, as can Arendt,
whose view that we are ‘love-oriented’ aligns her in that tradition. The
novel ends with Clair, the lycan lover, refusing a cure and celebrating her
otherness, and with a message of hope and acceptance of the monstrous
other without annihilating it.
Gothic, from its origins, has always been involved with medievalism.
Curtis Runstedler turns to the werewolf of medieval romance, where
a rational soul is trapped in an animal’s body. This leads to a more sym-
pathetic creature than some werewolves elsewhere, whether in folklore or
in the later tradition of Gothic horror. In addition, Runstedler argues that
this creature accords well with contemporary ethological studies of wolf
behaviour. This sets up a contrast with the sharp dichotomy between
wilderness and society that characterises medieval thought elsewhere.
Runstedler reads the Middle English poem William of Palerne (c. 1350,
translated from the French romance Guillaume de Palerne (c. 1200)) in the
light of these considerations.
Runstedler looks at the classical and Christian traditions to account for
the image of the wolf and werewolf in medieval literature. Ovid, Pliny, the
Bible, and St Augustine all contributed to the idea of the wolf (and hence
werewolf) as malign creatures. But the romances of Marie de France’s
5
Gothic Studies 21 (2019)
6
Introduction
raised by, animals, these stories reoccur through the ages, though many
are necessarily unverified. In many of those cases where information is
available, the children have been treated horrifically. Similar children
appear in zombie apocalypse fiction, and these narratives can inform an
analysis of social collapse and the feral children who are its victims.
Nevárez invites us to look at other figures from the eighteenth
and nineteenth centuries who are associated with the feral child – the
‘noble savage’, outside of civilisation, and the children of Romantic poetry
such as Wordsworth’s. Feral children, though, are animalistic rather
than simply innocent. There are feral children in horror fiction other
than zombie apocalypse stories. Some of these, rather than straddling
the boundary between animal and human, are purely monstrous and
supernatural. In the zombie texts, few children survive, but some do, and
these are often feral.
Nevárez poses important questions drawn from the contemporary
proliferation of zombie apocalypse fictions about what separates the wild
from the social, the animal from the human. She also examines how feral
children struggle to adapt, or how they thrive outside the community
walls and can be resocialised. The essay gives us illuminating parallels
between narratives of wild children (from Amala and Kamala, and
Peter the Wild Boy, to the savage children in William Golding’s 1954
novel Lord of the Flies) and those of child survivors in the zombie
apocalypse. Repulsion gives way to empathy but the horror of the
situation remains, prompting insights into real-life cases of abandoned or
feral children.
Michael Brodski, like Nevárez, acknowledges the portrayal of wild
children as entirely monstrous figures in the history of cinematic horror.
But he then turns his focus on to more sympathetic feral children in film,
concentrating on François Truffaut’s L’enfant sauvage (1970). This film
(along with a few others) is based on an actual historical case of a child
emerging from the wild and then being raised in society. Such children as
these do not feature as objects of horror. But Brodski asks what cinematic
functions are at work instead. He turns to the cultural historian James
R. Kincaid, who sees ‘the child’ as a socially constructed concept, and one
that allows a variety of meanings to be projected onto the actual child.
This is prompted by the adult’s nostalgia for their own lost infancy. In this
process, the discourses of childhood and wildness share many features.
There are elements in the film which seem to derive from Truffaut’s
own troubled childhood, and the film in general appears to have
benevolent intentions. But Brodsky suggests that there are tensions in
the original source material of Dr Itard’s journals on educating the
wild boy Victor that permeate through to the film. The wild child
7
Gothic Studies 21 (2019)
Notes
1. Catherine Spooner, Contemporary Gothic (London: Reaktion Books, 2006), p. 8.
2. An excellent anthology is Alexis Easley and Shannon Scott (eds.), Terrifying
Transformations: An Anthology of Victorian Werewolf Fiction (Richmond, VA:
Valancourt Books, 2013).
3. Christopher Frayling, Vampyres: Lord Byron to Count Dracula (London: Gollancz,
1978); Ken Gelder, Reading the Vampire (London: Routledge, 1994); Nina Auerbach,
Our Vampires, Ourselves (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1995).
4. Chantal Bourgault du Coudray, The Curse of the Werewolf: Fantasy, Horror and the Beast
Within (London and New York: I. B. Tauris, 2006).
5. Leslie A. Sconduto’s Metamorphoses of the Werewolf: A Literary Study from Antiquity
through the Renaissance (Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2008) is, as the title indicates,
confined to works up to the Renaissance period, excluding manifestations in forms
initiated by the later Gothic novel. Adam Douglas’s The Beast Within: A History of the
Werewolf (New York: Avon Books, 1994) is much broader but its Jungian approach is
reductive and unconvincing. In 1986 Charlotte F. Otten compiled A Lycanthropy
Reader: Werewolves in Western Culture (Syracuse University Press: New York, 1986) and
Brian J. Frost has built on this, providing a comprehensive reference work in
The Essential Guide to Werewolf Literature (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press,
2003). Kimberley McMahon-Coleman and Roslyn Weaver deal with more contempor-
ary manifestations (including Young Adult paranormal romance) in Werewolves and
Other Shapeshifters in Popular Culture: A Thematic Analysis of Recent Depictions
8
Introduction
(Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2012) as does Brent A. Stypczynski, The Modern Literary
Werewolf: A Critical Study of the Mutable Motif (Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2013).
Matthew Beresford, The White Devil: The Werewolf in European Culture (London:
Reaktion, 2013) is useful for the folkloric origins and subsequent development. There
are also the early antiquarian and folkloric studies of Sabine Baring-Gould (The Book of
Werewolves [1865]) and Montagu Summers (The Werewolf in Lore and Legend [1933]).
Hannah Priest’s edited collection on the She-Wolf: A Cultural History of Female
Werewolves (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2015) is a welcome addition to
contemporary werewolf scholarship, together with the essays in Werewolves, Wolves and
the Gothic, edited by Robert McKay and John Miller (Cardiff: University of Wales Press,
2017).
6. Sam George and Bill Hughes (eds), In the Company of Wolves: Werewolves, Wolves, and
Wild Children – Narratives of Sociality and Animality (Manchester: Manchester
University Press, 2019).
7. Details of the conference are at: ‘Company of Wolves 2015’, Open Graves, Open Minds,
http://www.opengravesopenminds.com/company-of-wolves/ [accessed 25 July 2018].
8. The conference had a huge impact both within and outside the academy and
was widely debated in the local, UK and international press. Many feature articles
focused on the new scholarship and place of the werewolf within academia: ‘Werewolf
conference will see academics shine a light on folkloric shapeshifter’, http://www.
independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/werewolf-conference-will-see-academics-shine-
a-light-on-folkloric-shapeshifters-10477155.html [accessed 25 July 2018]; ‘University
to host international werewolf conference’, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-
beds-bucks-herts-33971546 [accessed 25 July 2018]; ‘Werewolf conference: The people
seeking ‘the company of wolves’, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-
herts-34144752 [accessed 25 July 2018]. Following the conference, there were reviews
in the Times Higher Education Supplement, ‘Werewolf conference billed as first for
UK academy’, https://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/werewolf-conference-
billed-first-uk-academy [accessed 25 July 2018], and from Kathryn Hughes in The
Guardian, ‘In our dog-eat-dog world, it’s time for werewolves’, http://www.theguardian.
com/commentisfree/2015/aug/30/werewolves-scarcity-fear-vampires-sexual-anxiety
[accessed 25 July 2018].
9. As argued by Alexandra Warwick, in ‘Feeling Gothicky?’, Gothic Studies, 9:1 (2007),
5–15.
10. See Priest (ed.), She-Wolf.
11. See Andrew Smith and William Hughes (eds), EcoGothic, International Gothic Series
(Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013). McKay and Miller’s recent collection
of essays, Werewolves, Wolves and the Gothic adopts this slant for the most part.
12. Hughes, ‘In our dog-eat-dog world’.
9
Copyright of Gothic Studies is the property of Edinburgh University Press and its content may
not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's
express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for
individual use.