Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER II
INTERTEXTUALITY IN IAN McEWAN’S NOVELS
2.1. Introduction
This chapter explores the intertextuality in novels of Ian McEwan.
It takes into account the theoretical base of intertextuality prepared in the
last chapter for the analysis and interpretation of the select novels of Ian
McEwan. The characteristic features and elements of intertextuality
which are analyzed in the first chapter are utilized in the study of Ian
McEwan’s novels.
2.2. Atonement
2.2.1. Introduction
It is the story of two lovers Cecilia Tallis and Robbie Turner. They
just came home completing their education at Cambridge. Cecilia belongs
to the upper class, and Robbie is the son of a cleaning lady in Cecilia’s
house. He is adopted by Jack Tallis, father of Cecilia, Briony and Leon.
Dunkirk section in Part Two of the novel and the description of the
treatment of the wounded soldiers in Part Three apparently disclose that
the novel belongs to the genre of war literature. The provided material for
war stories goes back to the war writers of twenties and early twenty-first
century. The World War First inspired number of works such as Birdsong
(1993) by Sebastian Faulks and Regeneration trilogy by Pet Barker. More
importantly the World War Second is also the backdrop to ‘spies’ (2002)
by Michal Frayn, which draws adults’ perspective of childhood.
The above quote explores the view that Briony may be claiming to
attempt to atone for her sin against Robbie, but she may also be accused
of ‘colonizing’ him for the sake of her writing’ (Seaboyer: 32).
Atonement is mainly concerned with two themes that are literary
imagination and the art of novel writing.
In the Part One the readers’ attention drawn to the fact that the
Tallis family a typical 1950s bourgeoisie family. John Mullan in an
interview with McEwan points out the dramatic irony behind the
converse, as Briony has already seen Robbie in the library with Cecilia.
In which Leon is acting a kind of social lubricant. Cecilia argues in a
letter that Leon and rest of her family are to be condemned for their belief
in Robbie’s guilt. Robbie is frightened by accusation of Lola’s rape
exclaims:
Part One of the Atonement ends with Robbie’s arrest, and this point
questions the pre-war calm with the use of characters such as Leon and
100
Emily, and also represents the crumbling home. On the surface they
appear enviable for their privileged existence, but in reality they are seen
to be as damaged and unoriginal as the 40-years-old house that aspires to
be thought of as embodying centuries, but of tradition but is riddled with
faults.
The plot of the novel is borrowed from No Time for Romance and
The Memoir of Mrs. A Radolff. In an article in Mail on Sunday Julia
Langdon directly charges McEwan of plagiarism in Atonement. It was the
article on the similarities between McEwan’s Atonement and Lucilia
Andrews’s No Time for Romance in which Julia claims the plagiarism,
but took it differently the view that she suggests it is not ‘in dialogue’
with Andrews’ information. Rose Tremain has rightly pointed out
McEwan’s ability to transform the source material into something
“singular and new”.
style. McEwan weaves into the narrative details about the retreat to
Dunkirk from histories, letters and diaries.
These two works are very pivotal in the construction of the novel
Atonement. The Part Three of Atonement is clearly depending on two
novels, one Lucilia Andrews’ No Time for Romance (1997) and the
second is The Memoir of Mrs. A Radloff. McEwan describes the
disciplines of Briony’s training, terrible injuries of soldiers from Dunkirk.
The most of the position of this chapter borrowed from Andrews: the
description of authors’ training at St. Thomas in 1991. McEwan expands
and redefines those descriptions of the difficulty of keeping up her
writing in her limited space time and needing to be careful about what she
wrote because she had no personal place to lock her notebooks.
Both the women are slightly older than Briony, and they both write
in a pity and clear sighted manner that resembles older Briony’s style.
The sequence of the events of the first four sections of Part Three is based
almost exactly on Andrews’s autobiography. The part begins with
Briony’s training at St. Hospital London that emphasizes the hard work
and intense discipline of the work. Both Briny and Andrews give the
103
The sister’s reply to Briony making the same mistake is politer but
no less alarming; ‘This was how it was going to be…’ (At: 275).
Briony is told off for running the corridor with phrase “Only
hemorrhages and fires were permissible seasons for a nurse to run” (AT:
283) this is directly borrowed from Andrews’s that Andrews writes
“Please remember a nurse may only run for hemorrhage or fire”
(Andrews: 161). Here, Briony’s most of the ideas are dealing with
Andrews’s description that Andrews describes the bottle “Either I have to
employ you with my eyes should and holding my breath or I can’t empty
you at all” (Andrews: 155). McEwan skillfully describes how Briony
discovers the trick of emptying bottles, “the tricks of emptying them in
fact the only way it was possible for her, was to close her eyes, hold her
breath and avert her head” (AT: 283).
In this regard, Atonement becomes another's novel that exposes the role
of the novelist while challenging reader’s expectations.
believes have a delicate ego, and need constant support and sympathy.
She is dutiful and loving wife but often struggles with her husband’s
moods and selfishness. Without fail, she triumphed through these difficult
times and emphasized the ability to make something significant.
It allows the writer to show his gifts delve into the mysteries
of perception, present a modified version of thought
processes, permit the moods and unpredictability of private
self to be explored and so on….” However, such writing can
become precious when there is no sense of forward
movement … our attention would have been held even more
effectively had there been an underlying pull of simple
narrative. (294-297)
asking her to meet him by the fountain where she has broken off their
relationship’ (Mrs. Dalloway: 64).
This fountain scene presents Briony with new subject matter which
abandoning “fairly –tale castles and princess’ she determined to resolve
her attention to what seems far more interesting ‘the strangeness of here
and now, of what passed between people, the ordinary people that she
knew” (AT: 36) she is enthralled by the idea that ‘she could write the
scene three times over, from three different point of view’ (AT: 38).
I have been thinking about my last novel, the one that should
have been my first. The earliest version is in January 1940,
the latest, March 1990, and in both half a dozen different
drafts. The second draft June 1947, the third who cares to
know? My fifty-nine years assignment is over. (AT: 369)
to whom Robbie and Cecilia alludes and reveal their unfulfilled desires,
these references also betray their mutual understandings regarding
separation, the war and depth of their partners love. Their letters are
symbolizing Kristeva’s view that “writers often exaggerate the words, or
in this case, characters of another writer with new signification while
presenting the original meaning” (1980: 77).
The most important theme of the other work is infidelity that plays
very outstanding role in the construction of the characters. In the case of
Troilus and Criseyde and Tristan’s and Isolde’s tales, Troilus is
emphasizing woman’s unfaithful nature and Tristan focusing the man’s
disloyalty. Similar to it Robbie is also in a dilemma whether Cecilia will
with him or not. In the novel, McEwan skillfully does not give hints that
who uses this tale in the letters but it seems Robbie is the first introducer
of the tale Troilus and Cecilia, and he employs Tristan.
thought he returns and Cecilia’s love and in another the world shelter
around him.
Similarly, like Troilus tale, Tristan’s tale also alludes to this novel.
This tale is centrally concerned with the theme of repressed fear. Robbie
is under the allusion of Tristan and Troilus and thinks about the same
endings happened with Troilus and Criseyde and Tristan and Isolde. It is
well-known that the charge in Criseyde and Isolde are on their loyalty and
dishonesty. As Isolde states that Tristan’s love has refused to come, a lie
that causes the lonely man to die on the spot (AT: 352). As mentioned
Robbie worries that he will find Cecilia as transformed.
At the meeting, they kiss each other very intensively proves that
Cecilia remains faithful, more than Isolde and Criseyde. This honesty of
Cecilia helps Robbie to live alive during the retreat at Dunkirk, but he is
suspicious about both scenes and medieval figure, inhabited their earlier
letters which suggest still he fears that Cecilia cannot help but change
which it like his literary precursors.
world of nightmares, where she must restlessly wait for others to assure
her Robbie’s honesty.
find out evidence of older work in the recent work or we may the
influence of author’s predecessor. Traditionally, Milton’s influence on
Wordsworth, Keats influence on Yeats is very well-known. It is a
changed perspective of the reading that has formed. Barthes provides the
idea that every reading is a rereading, and every utterance is already said.
Whatever we are reading is ‘already read’. This view of Barthes’
connects the text with various relations, past and present.
The reader comes to know that how Hartley’s epilogue offers very
helpful point for discussion and its influence on McEwan’s epilogue.
Hartley’s epilogue is composed by Leo after he had written a narrative
that end’s with the news of Ted’s suicide. But McEwan’s epilogue
subverts reader’s knowledge not only about the content of the narrative
has it origin also. In both epilogues readers come to know the revelation,
in Hartley’s. Ted fathered Marin’s child is hardly surprising the readers
foresee this consequence but Leo could not. At the ending of McEwan’s
epilogue readers immediately required to know all the three preceding
parts for the consequence of the relation at the classing of epilogue.
McEwan too, like Hartley’s setting, sets his narrative of Part One
in country manor and both families Tallis and Maudsley belong to gentry
for generations. Both the works are clearly depicting the class barriers in
the construction of the narratives. The class is important function in the
story that Robbie Turner, the male protagonist belongs to lower class, as a
son of cleaning lady and Cecilia the female protagonist and all her family
belongs to upper middle class. The relation between Robber and upper
class love story is rightly depicted by D. H. Lawrence in Lady
Chatterley’s Lover.
McEwan has created very apt country side atmosphere under the
tradition of theme of country house setting. In Atonement, country estate
setting generates atmosphere of self-contained replica of the society
which represents the tradition. We can find such kind of atmosphere in a
number of nineteenth-century novels; such as Austen’s Mansfield Park,
Northanger Abbey, Lawrence’s Bleak House and also Tom Stoppard’s
play The Real Inspector Hound.
Similarly, McEwan’s too starts his novel on the hot day like
twenty-three days on which The Go-Between took place. This
unseasonable heat symbolizes explosion of Eros as Robbie stated that
“can I, don’t think I can blame the heat” (AT: 80). When they return from
Cambridge into their world of childhood in which they played together as
brother and sister. That’s why Cecilia feels comfortable to strip her
underwear in front of Robbie to retrieve the Messien Vase from the
fountain. But this incident effects on the mind of Robbie. He starts to
think differently about Cecilia though she was like his sister. His
observation of Cecilia shifts from sister to a desirable woman. He goes
back to his room and starts writing a letter, his first love letter. Here this
kind of writing is an example of Barthes’ nation of writing, as an
expression of the ‘déjà vu’. Here, Robbie’s argument echoes the copy of
Lady Chatterley’s Lover. Robbie’s unconscious speaking is making him
as ‘Freudian Sleep’. It is embodied through the letter; he handovers
through Briony to Cecilia. Broiny the younger sister very surprisingly
reads letter but performs like another ‘go-between’. Briony is a narrator
of the story like Leo she is also on the brink of puberty, as a child lack of
understanding of sexual behaviour. Both Leo and Briony have mixed
feelings that are mature and immature. At one time, they are in
imagination and reality too. Their border of childhood ends and they
come to know the truth and once the truth comes it is the death of her
innocence. The primal scene in the both novels is an important factor
which is the key of their death of innocence.
130
Briony’s is the author of the novel, not McEwan, and she wrote
everything with her perception and documented by research. From
prologue to epilogue we are forced to reread and emphasized with ‘déjà
vu’ that is we have already read. Like Leo Briony too depicts every scene
of the novel such as Robbie’s memory of the love scene in the library.
The ‘unreliable narrator’ is the central force in both the novels that
as both the narrators are aware of the ‘term’ since its coinage a generation
ago by Wayne Booth. These novels are impressively impacting on
readers by their utter impression in textuality that by reading the prologue
that reader comes to knows that both narrators were known that they were
too great writers of the modern fiction. Both McEwan’s and Hartley’s
novels emerged from lost innocence of narrators by the traumatic events
in their childhood.
McEwan’s this novel is most clearly about the survival and love in
its several forms: such as romantic, familial, idealized, obsessive, jealous.
It is used for two forces that are destruction of love and love as a
destructive force. The protagonist obsessed with John Keats’ Ode on
Grecian Urn and the novel filled up by lines of this poem and the aspect
of romantic love borrowed from various sources. The themes of the novel
134
The above quote states that the writing of McEwan is representing some
of the historical accounts. It is through protagonist Clarissa’s secret that is
represented through the gothic story “Rampelstiltstskin” (EL: 224). It
indicates the reference of fairy tale and involving the magical possibility
of saving a child from being cruelly taken from its parents. McEwan uses
fairy tale as a background of the story.
Unlike The Turn of The Screw, Enduring Love has not evoked
division among its critics since Joe’s sanity is taken as irrefutable.
McEwan’s novel produces reading effect (Felman use the word 126 in
italic) which is similar to James’ text. In which a tension between
narrational believability and unreliability created that critics struggle to
resolve in their various readings. This elusive point of interpretive
reconciliation functions as missing or repressed text that is figured in
different ways written the novel itself. Like Henry’s novella Enduring
Love’s structures and motifs calling the attention towards the process of
writing and reading, especially the interpretation of putting into words of
meanings just below the surface of undertaking.
Joe has lost his faith, in ‘taking cure’— ‘A gentle fraud in my view
(EL: 99) his tale resembling a remark of psychoanalytical narrative
known as “transference” to the reader in the position of ‘analyst’ (Childs:
2007: 110). In Enduring Love, the idea of transference of Freud
resembles through Joe, who describes his experience several times in
oneiric terms. Logan’s death recalls to him recurring nightmare from his
youth in which he fail to rescue during disasters; self-appears to him to be
“the stuff of bad dreams”(EL: 147). Further, there are repressed anxieties
attached to transitory images such as ‘the flash of a white shoes and
something red’ (EL: 49) that Joe sees in library.
137
and the unique combination of scientific and literary values. This novel
conveys/reflects a new cultural outlook, creatively reimagining the
modern and postmodern ideas of truth and progress.
comprehend and judge fictional minds as we have in real life. The people
enjoy fictional experiences because of it they exercise their mind reading
capabilities: people like to imagine what others are thinking. This work of
McEwan necessarily engages with misunderstanding capacities, as
Blackey Vermeule believes that novel ‘play on our need to fathom the
deepest motivations of other peoples’ (Vermeul, 2010: 62). Enduring
Love emphasizes on the fundamental human desire to understand others.
James Phelan states “narratives typically ask their readers to judge
characters” (Phelman, 2009: 311).
have to use their theory of mind in order to try to follow the workings of
character’s mind. Otherwise, they will lose the plot” (Palmer, 2009: 293).
Lisa Zunshine examined that the reader percepts the hidden mental
state of fictional characters by “deliver a rich stimulation to the cognitive
adaptations constituting our Theory of Mind” (Zunshine, 2007: 195). In
Why we ReadNovels? Zunshineargues the key reason the reader desires
fiction is ‘engages, teases, and pushes to its tentative limits our mind
reading capacity’ (Zunshine, 2006: 4). And novels exist because of our
active Theory of Mind (5). In this way, novel is an experience of an
alternative self in a world which is infinitely appealing and also
necessary. McEwan explores and exploits our mind-reading capacities in
a number ways in this novel by using textual, as well as intertextual
signals. Enduring Love explicitly focuses on minds’ engaging with other
minds and its effect on the reading experience is tremendously exploring
how we interpret other minds.
Enduring Love uses the flexibility in its form to find out different
manifestations of our Theory of Mind. It is mainly emphasizing the love
altruism and passionate psychotic disorder i.e. –de Clerambault’s
Syndrome where love becomes obsessive. Here, the reader is invited to
understand the abstract feeling ‘love’. In this regard, McEwan uses
‘LOVE IS A JOURNEY’ as a metaphor. This understanding of love
implicitly and explicitly goes towards the Romantic poet John Keats. It
shows the two impacts of love imaginative and emotional which is a
central to our subjective experience of the world. This kind of narrative
technique is creating a structured cognitive model that guiding our
responsive to the novel. The title of the novel ‘enduring’ itself is
polysemic that is both gerent and adjective. It signifies lasting and
suffering, representing our extraordinary reading of others minds. Theory
142
The opening of the novel is very complex which puts the reader in
the state of confusion and reflecting role of undertaking which indicating
the state of mind of psychologist William James’s national of the “barrier
of belonging to foddering personal minds” (James, 1890: 226). As they
actively try to make sense of Joe, questioning his reliability as a narrator.
The discourse of the novel places a sustained emphasis on the ‘universal
[and] genetically inscribed’ (EL: 4) roles of facial and bodily expressions
in revealing mental states. McEwan’s concentrated focalization privileges
the reader to see inside Joe’s mind, and it invites the order to analyses
Parry just as Joe does, as we would if this were real life and fiction. In
this instance when Parry stares at Joe, Joe radically misinterprets Perry’s
expressions and the reader is promoted by Joe’s diction ‘the stranger’s
clear, blue eyes held mind’(EL: 20). Joe closely observes Perry’s
physicality attributes; he is:
Fanny’s love is very innocent and distanced by 200 years belonging to the
imaginary both parallels and comments on what at first is Clarissa’s and
Joe’s passionate love, then the fading love under strain as well as on
Parry’s morbid obsession that the parody of love which will finally
invade couple’s lives and encroach their happiness. Clarissa’s and Joe’s
daily existence and their love caught in the gears of artificiality of Jed
Parry’s sick obsession.
romantic text. On the other hand, it accepts romantic poetry on its terms
such it without parody, refraction and trans-contextualization. By
excessive use of intertextuality that is critical practice fooling the reader
with the made-up of text and suggesting that like romantic poetry truth
can be attained through beauty. McEwan starting here that is ‘return to
basics’ which abandoning the ironic and relativistic strategies of
postmodernism and even return to textual autonomy and superiority of
individual work of art over the postmodern blurring of boundaries of
which intersexuality is prime exponent.
obsessive and jealous. The love is the central factor of the novel which
home two forces that are destructive of love and about love as a
destructive force.
Enduring love is a novel with one narrator but is a story with three
central protagonists who all have a different character starting of human
reality. Joe Rose is a rationalist who things science reveals the facts about
existence and the universe. Though he might not disagree with this
standpoint, his partner Clarissa Mellon feels that art, beauty and
happiness, not facts are at the central of people’s relationships and that
these are the important things that underpin life and love. Jed Parry
believed that God underpins reality. Three of them thus begin form three
different premised: cognition, emotion and faith. It is worth notable that
these three perspectives are also related to a significant period of Western
cultural history. The view that God was at the center of life was
‘inconstable’ in Europe up to the Renaissance. After that through the
influence of art and classical civilization, human interests become more
important: since 18th century Enlightenment, rationalism and science have
dominated our understanding of the world, though the Romantic period at
the turn of 19th century reasserted the importance of nature, emotion and
imagination.
century epic poem of the fall, Paradise Lost (While first chapter
concludes with ‘I’ we never seen such a terrible thing as that falling
man’(EL: 16) a direct quotation from Paradise lost follows shortly :
“Hurled headlong flaming from the Ethereal Sky” (EL:29).
In this way, Keats is not only renowned for his poetry but also for
his letters in literature. In the same way, Clarissa’s believe “love that did
not find its expression in a letter was not perfect” (EL: 7). It is to be
considered in this light that it would be impossible to resolve what is
‘Perfect love’ it might be other that God’s. This is perfectly alluding that
the story of John Keats and Fanny Browne (the girl next door) one of the
well-known love affair in letters. It was a relationship in which Keats
greatly engaged because he felt that his love was unrequited. This story
reader can relate with love affair of Jed and Joe in which Jed seeks to
153
have with Joe through his 1000 letters. There is a similarity between the
ends of John Keats and Jed Parry. Keats died by the disease of
tuberculosis and Jed died by a very different cried of illness. Joe’s intense
scanning of these letters for clue about Jed is meant directly to parallel
Carissa’s literal analysis of Keats. Clarissa’s search of the last unset letter
from Keats to Fanny finds its correlative in final letter of Enduring Love,
which is an unsent letter (last letter in the novel) from Parry declaring his
undying love for Joe. There are some similarities between Jed’s and
Keat’s letters one of them is ‘You will call this madness’ (May 1820)
“Ask yourself my love whether you are not very circle to have so
untrammelled me, so destroyed my freedom” (1st July, 1819), “I cannot
exists without you – I am forgetful of everything but seeing you again -
my life seems to stop three – I see no further. You have absorbed me”
(13th October, 1819) ‘Do not live as if I was not existing…. You must be
mine to die upon the rack if I want you” (May 1820).
Doggedly pursued his ‘God chosen bride’ over several years. His
other interests were subordinated. He created chars for the objects of his
affections, put the lines of others in danger, and totally destroyed the
fabric of his own life, culminating in long, term incarceration (Mullen
and Pethe, 1994: ).
how the rhythm of everyday life changes for everybody and he and his
wife Julia become the structure on which the narrative is based. The
opening of the novel suggests three novel’s opening in the same
presentation such as Charles Dickens A Tale of Two Cities (1860-61),
John Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath (1939) and George Orwell’s 1984
(1949). Here, in this novel each chapter is prefaced by quotation from a
fictitious text The Authorized Childcare Handbook. The themes of the
novel are time, science and art comparable with a short story The Time
Machine (1895) by H.G. Wells. As a political satire this novel recalls the
first part of Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels (1726) where Swift
makes the satire of the court of Queen Anna and here McEwan does it on
contemporary politics of Margaret Thatcher. This novel is mainly about
stories of boys’ adventures which hints reader the stories of J.M. Barrie’s
Peter Pen (1904), Robert Louis Stevenson’s Treasure Island (1883), R.M.
Ballantyne’s The Coral Island and William Golding’s Lord of the Flies
(1954). In this novel some quotes are from T.S. Eliot’s poem Four
Quartets (1944) especially from the first part (Burnt Norton) here how
McEwan picks Eliot’s ideas of ‘Time’ and reinterprets in the novel. The
female protagonist of this novel Mrs. Lewis is compared with D.H.
Lawrence’s Sons and Lovers (1913) protagonist Mrs. Gertrude, on the
masculine characteristics of these two women and their early
disappointment in their relationship with their lovers. In this novel ‘nature
of time’ is playing the central factor which explores so many work of arts
in case of time such as A Brief History of Time (1988) by Stephen
Hawking which gives theoretical ideas about time which are
experimented in the novel with new scientific theories about time. In this
way some of the other influences that are reader is recollecting some
poems about time which give some similarities in presentation of time
such as Sonnet 60 of Shakespeare, To His Coy Mistress by Andrew
156
We ran behind the backs of houses the next town, new and
wonder-script. Approached with areas of dismantled cars…
how fields were building plots... And as the tightened brakes
took hold, there swelled. A sense of falling, like an arrow-
shower, sent out of sight, somewhere becoming rain. (Paul,
1995: 50).
It is clear that Larkin’s poem is not simply about landscape, but it’s
about weddings and mixed values and emotions that marriages (by
implication of parenthood’s) indicate. His poems are representing a
triumph over the small minded misanthropy shown in the description of
wedding parties themselves. And that triumph is expressed through
pastorals. It is interesting to note that how McEwan is representing
Larkin’s words.
parallax as one row (of the geometrically arrayed conifers) cedes to the
next a pleasing effect…” (CT: 52). We can connect this with Stephan’s
agreement in the political fraud of the child care commission on which he
serves. Despite his belief, he is capable of simply shrugging his shoulders
& the whole business, so impoverished is his political expectations in this
England.
The novel The Child In Time alerts the reader that how there is the
larger scope of the novel and its central ideas. In the novel the reader
comes to know that the novel is not about ‘a child’ but ‘the child’ in any
human being especially in any adult such as in the novel Charles who
becomes child again. The protagonist Stephen is also a child. The
childhood and the child are the central themes of the novel it accounts
various aspects childhood and also harshly comment on the society,
politics and government. The reality of London society presented through
child beggars, the governments committees on children. Some of the
other subthemes are also interwoven such as procreation nurturing,
parenting of children and the Authorised Childcare Handbook. Another
central factor of the novel that is ‘time’ which binds together all
children’s or they are set in time such as time past, present and future. On
the other hand the mysteries of time, the overlap of time, the relationship
of children to time, the meaning of time for children and adults they
become, the effect of passing time on children, the freezing of time when
a child remains ever the age at which she disappears.
The overall setting, theme and content suggest that both novels are
exploring valuable views of family through the protagonists. In both
novels, the strengths of community values are made apparent. When
Dorothy loses her memory and finds herself lost in London where people
were willing to help her. In fact, the first person she meets Nobby, takes
the responsibility of her welfare.
163
Similarly, the both novels are sticking with family where families
can overcome the painful experienced poverty especially in Orwell’s
novel, and McEwan novel is too about grief and anguish experienced by
the protagonist Stephan. In the novel, The Child In Time Stephan’s family
is once diminished and at last recruited. Two things are juxtaposed that
the death of Stephan’s friend Charles and his discovery that his estranged
wife is pregnant. Here, McEwan has created a world where the sudden
loss of a loved one is fulfilled by the creation of a new one or life. He
describes that as he reaches Julie’s cottage “all the sorrow, all the empty
waiting had been enclosed within a meaningful time within the richest
folding conceivable” (CT: 235). In this way, McEwan has summed up the
novel with birth of a new baby. He has depicted the family as “they lay
watching planet and moon descends through sky that was turning blue”
164
(CT: 245). Here the imagery of moon and planet suggest that they find
happiness in the end through supernatural elements. The fact is that the
novel ends with rising sun which is the sentimental metaphor for renewed
possibility that their relationship will be as it was. The birth of a new
baby completes their family, and they enter into a new brighter day.
There are other similarities in the context these novel are written.
David Malcolm notes that the England in The Child In Time is what
might be imagined the version of power of Thatcher. It was a country
with privatized ambulances, and governmental responsibilities had been
refined in simpler purer terms taking no account of individual welfare. It
is reflecting perfectly Thatcher’s assertion, in 1987 edition of women
own that ‘there are individual men and women and there are families’ and
famously ‘there is no such thing as society’ (Web). In The Child In Time,
the family must support each other in the absence of state help. For
example, McEwan allows Stephan to break the conventional barriers of
time to observe and influence his mother decision to keep rather than
abort him whilst he is still in the womb. By this example Stephan taking
his responsibility to his welfare by persuading his pregnant mother to be
in love with it, whoever it was? It demonstrates that keeping families
together is necessarily in a time of individualist attitude.
McEwan’s novel states that the answer to your problem is ‘right in front
of you was___’ (CT: 226) the dash here highlights the phone calls come
at the ideal moment, romantically allowing Julie to announce the good
news.
This is what Stephan gives hint about his adaptation of the theme
of childhood from Wordsworth, one of the great philosopher and writer
concerned with the theme of childhood. Wordsworth in one of the
167
present and future. Stephen’s life is changed because of the past event, his
daughter’s abduction and his present under the influence of past and how
past desires are fulfilled in the future. Such kind of allusions McEwan has
very skillfully used. This novel of McEwan is incorporating many of
experiences of ‘time’ and exhibiting the philosophy of Henri Bergson.
Especially Bergson’s Time and Free Kill exploring his ideas regarding
time as ‘distinguished between extensive psychological duration, which is
unique and creative, and extensive clock time as homogeneous and
repeatable for example in the novel the subjective experience of few
seconds [of clock-time] in which Stephan manages to avoid a lorry which
is about to ‘crashing in front of his car is characterized as ‘duration
shep(ing) it-self round the event’ (CT: 89).
This phase of the life is extracted by June in his work Modern Man in
Search of Soul:
Here, the character Charles is fit to the Oedipal hero obsessed with
a desire. Freud wrote about “split libido” which is a defense against
incestuous wishes for Oedipal mother:
The above quotation explores the personality of Charles, who lived with
his wife, flirts with the prime minister and visited prostitute.
The Filth on the streets, the dirty message on the walls, the
poverty, son, it’s all changed in ten years. That’s the last
time I visited Pauline, ten years ago. It’s a new country more
like the Far East at its worst. I haven’t got the strength for it,
or the stomach (CT: 209).
The novel explores not only the loss of past but also the destruction
of time; the annihilation of hope, of ambition, of promise, is spread out
through the text. Stephan’s account of what has become or his friends
from student days, “the aesthetic and political experimenters, the
visionary drug takers” (CT: 25), all have ‘settled for even less’ than
whatever he has everywhere harassed and ill paid teachers, cleaners, taxi
drivers, all have failed to fulfill their promises.
word “family is a place of peace, a shelter not only from injure, but from
all terror, doubt and vision’ (Cohen: 1991). Through time, the function of
family is always changed. So there is the discovery of “childcare” which
increasing interest in children’s life and education. Over the tine, we
come to know that from Dickens’ orphan children and on apprenticeship
children are replaced by schooling. Al these ideas are from history
influencing on the literature of the postmodern era. Especially McEwan is
well aware of the fact that his presentation of the child is interlinked with
the history of childhood.
Since long time childhood has been the central theme of English
literature. Children were the subject of great lyrics of Elizabeth period.
To some extent, we can find the theme of childhood in poetry of Pope
and Dryden too. However, as substantial theme of literature it was
aroused with novel. Its importance gradually increased through 18th
century and developed in19th century and challenged in 20th century.
Today, theme of childhood is to understanding Victorian literature, but
20th century produced the real literature or entertainment. In 18th century
child became the central subject or plethora of writing. This writing
reflected the dichotomy of childhood which was seen as a symbol of
181
Thus, the present novel is under the great influence of 18th and
19th-century novels. The very atmosphere, themes and characterization of
the novel are strictly in the sense of the traditional manner that is very
easy.
183
This novel is primarily about the four children Jack, Julie, Sue and
Tom and death of their father and mother. This death of parents creates
the problem of their existence in the society and how they are saved from
social exploitation as orphans. Here, McEwan was accused for plagiarism
by several reviewers because the plot of this story world has several
parallels such as: Julian Gloag’s Our Mother’s House (1963) where the
circumstances of beginning of the novels are similar that in Gloan’s story
there are seven children who bury their mother in the backyard garden to
save from being sent to an orphanage. Further, Sir William Golding’s
dark and fascinating Lord of the Flies (1954) also concerned in case of
the children’s adventures. McEwan himself admits the influence of
Golding’s novel that “What was so attractively subversive and feasible
about Golding was his apparent assumption that in a child-dominated
world things went wrong in a most horrible and interesting way…”.(web)
Morel from Sons and Lovers or little six years old James in opening
pages of Virginia Woolf’s To the Light House. And similar death of
Jack’s mother refers to the death of David Copper field’s mother.
The narrator of the novel drifts between the adolescence and that of
adulthood. The narrator of the present novel follows the tradition of
Kafka and Samuel Beckett. There is a striking similarity between the
narrative technique of Kafka and that of The Cement Garden. Both the
narrators avoid the names of the places and locations in the novel. This
feature gives The Cement Garden its different place in the all the other
contemporary novels. The narrator even avoids giving the fictional details
of the places and locations. Even the narrator is not interested to tell about
the location of the children’s residence.
The above lines are giving the idea that, there is no shock of death
of the narrator’s father. But it is just a process or an event to which they
confront neutrally. The above incident reminds us of the narrator Paul
Morel in Sons and Lovers by D. H. Lawrence. James is the narrator of
Virginia Woolf’s To The Lighthouse (1927) who confronts to the death of
his father with the same neutrality.
I stood upon a chair when I was left alone, and looked into
the glass to see how red my eyes were, and how sorrowful
my face ... I am sensible of having felt that a dignity attached
to me among the rest of the boys, and that I felt important in
my affliction. (Dickens 117-118)
In the above situation David also observes himself dry and hard like that
of jack in The Cement Garden. Here he notices his eyes are red due to the
186
crying and the grief of loss of his mother. But the narrator’s attitude
towards the death of the mother is not good in the traditional manner of
the death of someone.
Above lines making us ware that it is clear that in the present novel
McEwan tries to uncover the adolescence of his contemporary times. This
life was totally devoid of enjoyment and humour. Therefore in the present
novel McEwan gives negligible space for the humour and religion.
Regarding the absence of religion Christopher Williams again rightly
comments that:
187
The above lines are symbolizing that, McEwan gives a space for the God
and fate. He directly tries to bring out an austere reality of the human life.
He has nothing to do with the superstitions and religious beliefs in the
society. His basic concerns are totally different from the contemporary
writers. Therefore, it is different from Lord of the Flies.