THE COLONIAL RULE –BATTLE OF POLASHI (1757), BATTLE OF BAXUR (1764) Through the Battle of Polashi in 1757, the British East India Company used Bengal as springboard for British colonial expansion across South Asia & the centre of global drugs trade . Four independent Nawabs:, Murshid Kuli Khan, Sharfarz Khan, Alibardi Khan & then Siraj-ud Daula ruled the Kingdom of Bengal for 50 years, then fell at the hands of British East India Company (BEIC) authority for 190 years. It was a fateful battle that subjugated the people of the region to prolonged colonial exploitation for which the British maritime group was gradually getting prepared from the earlier century. EARLY LIFE OF SIRAJ:
Mirza Muhammad Sirajuddaula was the grandson
of Nawab Alivardi Khan and son of Amina Begum and Zainuddin Ahmad Khan. Born in 1733, he was the darling of his grandfather the Nawab of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa Alivardi Khan. As Alivardi Khan has no son he chose Siraj as his successor and trained him to become one day the Nawab of Bengal. Siraj was given a good education, and trained in the art of war and governing the country. After the death of his father, Mirza Zainuddin, in 1748, Siraj was made the Nawab of Bihar. SIRAJ ASCENDED THE THRONE OF BENGAL BIHAR AND ORISSA After the death of Alivardi Khan on 10 April,1756 Sirajuddaula became the Nawab of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa. His selection in 1756 as the Nawab of bengal, Bihar and Orissa created much discontentment among his own close relations and some high officials. CONSPIRACY Siraj was born in 1733.Sirajuddaula, the new nawab was only 23 when he ascended the throne of Bengal. soon after his accession Siraj found himself surrounded by enemies, both local and foreign. The principal local conspirator were Mir Jafar (Nawabs commander in chief) high official like Rai Durlabh, Raj Ballabh, Manik Chand, Yar Latif, Khadim Hossain and Naba Krishna, the most powerful bankers Jagat Sheth and Omi Chan, Nanda Kumar, Governor of Purnea and Ghaseti Begum. However, his greatest enemy was the English East India Company, who were quite openly ignoring the nawab. The English got involved in this conspiracy for securing some kind of political and trading benefits. BACKGROUND OF THE BATTLE The battle of Plassey had a long background that could be traced from the beginning of the East India Company's settlement in Bengal in early 1650s. The first English factory in Bengal was established at Hughli in 1651 under permission from Sultan Shah Shuja, second son of Emperor Shahjahan and then Subahdar of Bengal. In the same year Subahdar Shuja granted the company the privileges of free trade throughout Bengal, Bihar and Orissa for a nominal lump sum payment of Rs. 3000. BACKGROUND OF THE BATTLE – (CONTINUE)
In 1658, the British East India Company
(BEIC) opened factories in Hoogly, Patna & Kasimbazar. In 1690, the BEIC initially secured trade facilities in Kolkata from the Nawab of Bengal by fixing Rs.1,200/- licence fees per year. BACKGROUND OF THE BATTLE – (CONTINUE) In 1698 the English company obtained from Subahdar Azim-us-Shan the zamindari of villages of Sutanauti, Kolkata and Gavindapur. They even established a fort at Calcutta and named it Fort William. In 1717, the BEIC renewed trade facilities from Emperor Forrukh Siyer in Delhi with the payment of Rs.3,000/-per year. BACKGROUND – (CONTINUE)
Due to the abuse of trade facilities & evading of
taxes by the BEIC officials to local authorities, Bengal government was losing huge amount of revenue, but the BEIC was in no mode to address it. Right from the beginning, the BEIC perceived Siraj-ud Daula as unfriendly & a threat to their trade facilities in Bengal. Major European trading companies greeted the new Nawab, but the BEIC ignored. BACKGROUND- CONTINUE With the accession of Sirajuddaula in April 1756, the conflict between the nawab and the English company became almost inevitable as the young Nawab strongly challenged the East India Company‟s activity in Bengal. Nawab had three main conditions against the British:
1. Unauthorized fortification works in and around Calcutta
must be demolished. 2. As alliance they must pursue their legal trade strictly according to the law of the land. 3. They must hand over to nawab all illegal shelter given to the nawab‟s disloyal and offending officials The Company starkly refused Nawab‟s condition on the other hand the Nawab also refused to accept the Company as bonafide (genuine) trades in the country. He dispatched troops and took over all the English trading factories and finally expelled the English from Calcutta in June 1756. Shiraj ud Daula invaded the English factory at Qasim bazar and then marched on to Calcutta. CONFLICT WITH THE EAST INDIA COMPANY/ENGLISH: Various events and developments led to these conflicting relations i. The English like other representatives of European trading companies did not congratulate Siraj on his succession and did not send any gift or present to him which was customary. This led Siraj to believe that the English were involved in conspiracy against him. ii. The English extended their hands to Ghaseti begum and Shawkat Jang, the Nawab of Purnea. CONFLICT (CONT.) iii. The English gave shelter to the disloyal, disobedient and offending officials of the Nawab. iv. The firman or permission to trade in the country given to the East India Company in 1717 was much abused by all the officials of the Company for private gain. v. The British fortification strategies in Kolkata, in violation of the Mughal dastak, sparked conflict with the Bengal authority.. The British intent to capture political power in Bengal was heavily influence by their interest in regional drug trade. Attack over Kashimbazar military base by Sirajudud Daula in June 1756. Destruction of Patna trade link by Siraj animated BEIC to take revenge. In 1891, George Watt maintained that: „the attack of Nawab Seraj-ud Daula over the Kashimbazar military base in 1756, & the disruption in the supply of opium from the Patna Opium dealers‟ to the British East India Company, led to the Battle of Plassey in the following year‟. Seven year war in Europe led the French & British companies to increase their various defensive measures and began to build military forts on Chandannagar & Kolkata respectively. Upon learning it Siraj asked both the French and the English to stop it. The French listened but the English did not and carried on building military structures in Kolkata. The British propagated “Black Hole” story about the death of 123 British prisoners. Becoming Nawab, Seraj attacked Purnia & killed Shawkat Jang in May 1756 & arrested his aunty Gosheti Begum as reprisal. SIRAJ MARCHED ON TO KOLKATA Siraj then marched on with his troops to capture Kolkata. The English could not face Siraj and Governor Drake and others took shelter in the ships in the Bhagirathi River. He easily captured Kolkata on 20 June 1756. He appointed Manikchand as governor of Kolkata, and returned to Murshidabad. MOVE BY THE ENGLISH/ARRIVAL OF LORD CLIVE ON THE SCENE When the news of the fall of Kolkata reached Madras, the Council of Madras decided to send Colonel Robert Clive and Admiral Watson with troops and war ships to recapture Kolkata. When Clive and Watson reached Kolkata the conspirator Manikchand fled without fight and the English easily recaptured Kolkata in January 1757. SIRAJ AGAIN MARCHED TO KOLKATA TO RECAPTURE KOLKATA When Siraj heard this news he became angry and left hurriedly Murshidabad to fight against the English. Upon his arrival on the outskirts of Kolkata he was suddenly attacked by Clive and Watson. Although disarrayed for a little while by this, Siraj regrouped his troops and counter attacked them and Clive and Watson took shelter in the Kolkata fort. A sudden change in the thinking of Siraj however made him to conclude a treaty with the English rather than fighting them. This was the outcome of some of his apprehensions. These were the existing tense situation prevailiing in the country, the doubt about the sincerity of his commande –in – chief Mir Jafar and the plausible attack upon Bihar by the advancing Ahmed Shah Abdali, the Afgan leader. The treaty which he concluded with the English is known as Alinagar treaty. ALINAGAR TREATY (FEBRUARY 9, 1757)
The Treaty of Alinagar was signed on February 9,
1757 between Robert Clive and Siraj-ud-Daula. Based on the terms of the accord: Clauses: a) The Nawab will return the fort of Kolkata to the English along with all their previous rights. b) The English will be able to build forts and mint coins. c) As reparation of war Siraj will have to pay a huge amount of money. CONSPIRATORS AT MURSHIDABAD
A conspiration took place at Murshidabad.
The opponents of Siraj chose Mir Jafar as their prospective new Nawab. Clive supported the anti-Siraj camp and entered into conspiracy. It was agreed that if successful the English will receive nearly two crores of rupees as gift. THE BATTLE OF PLASSEY, 23 JUNE 1757 When the conspiracy was complete Clive made a false allegation of breaking the term of peace against Siraj and declared war against him. Soon a military contingent led by Clive left Kolkata to face Siraj. And Siraj was already on his way to Kolkata. On 22 June 1757 he was camping at a village on the bank of river Bhagirathi some 23 miles south from Murshidabad. Clive reached the village on the night of 22 June. On 23 June 1757 at the mango orchard of the village of Polashi took place one of the most important events in history. The Nawab‟s army contained 40,000 infantry, 28,000 Cavalry while the Clive‟s army consisted of only 3,000 men including English Soldiers. The war started at about 8 in the morning on 23 June 1757, but gunpowder of Nawab‟s army got wet due to heavy rain in the previous night. From the beginning of the battle both Mir Jafar, Yar Latif and Rai Durlav stood silently with their vast forces (two-third) without coming forward to fight. Mir Mardan & Mohonlal fought courageously. Upon Mir Jafar‟s advise Nawab stopped the battle. At the time of troops withdrawal in war field, the BIEC forces attacked the scattered troops & by 5:00pm the battle was over. Being defeated, on his way to Rajmahal, the Nawab Seraj-ud Daula was captured by Miron, the son of Mir Jafar Ali Khan, & killed by Mohammodi Beg. The defeat of Nawab was political in nature but not a military one. Mir Jafar became the new Nawab of Bengal, but the real authority was now transferred to the BIEC. Mir Jafar Ali Khan attempted to repulse the British supremacy by the Dutch in Bengal trade. In the Battle of Biderra at Hoogly on 25 November 1759, the British & Dutch troops fought face to face, the later being in support of the Nawab‟s army Following the defeat of Mir Jafar, his son in law Mir Qasim was installed as new Nawab by the British. On 23 October 1764, however, the Buxar War ensued between the BEIC & the joint forces Mir Qasim, Mughal Emperor Shah Alam II & the Nawab of Awadh Shuja-ud-Daulah to repulse the British. Battle of Buxar 1764 Battle of Buxar (1764)
• Battle of Buxar, marked the final ascendancy of the
English in Bengal. After the battle of Palashi (I757), the English East India Company was seized with bottomless greed, believing that the wealth of Bengal was inexhaustible.
• Mir Qasim tried to assert his independence but
desperately needed money in order to organize the hopelessly chaotic condition of the country. Unfortunately he already mortgaged his fortune to the company as price of Nawabi by transferring these districts: Burdwan, Midnapur and Chittagong for the maintenance of their troops. • Mir Qasim shifted the capital from Murshidabad to Mungher a distant and not easily accessible hill-fort in Bihar and far from the reach of the English marine strike.
• He raised there a new army and a new bureaucracy. He
dismissed the faithless Zamindars and made the loyals to pay for the reformed army. Finally he asserted his sovereign status and called upon the company and other private traders to refrain themselves from resorting to unlawful trading activities and to honor the laws of the land.
• The English paid scant (little) regard to his call. The
abuse of Dastak continued unabated (persistent). [Dastak:Trade permit sanctioned to the East India Company by the Mughal Government]. • In July 1763 the enraged Nawab attacked Patna and captured all company establishments there. Many resisting Europeans were killed including the chief of Patna factory. Mir Qasim’s Patna action triggered off a full scale war between the Company and the Nawab.
• The combined forces (Mir Qasim, Mughal Emperor Shah
Alam ii and the Nawab of Audh Shuja-Ud-Daulah) met the British in a decisive battle at Buxar on 23 October 1764. The English army defeated the allied troops comprehensively. Meanwhile; the Company had made a fresh treaty with Mir Jafar and reinstated him as the Nawab.
• The Battle of Buxar led to the Company’s acquisition of
Diwani in 1765 which in turn brought the Company close to sovereignty. • Buxar was a decisive battle. The company thus gained supreme control over the administration (or nizamat) of Bengal as well as secured the DIWANI or the right to collect revenue, of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa.
• Thus the British now had the power without
responsibility. The nawab and his officials had the responsibility of administration but not the power to discharge it. LIST OF THE NAWABS
Nawab Murshid Kuli Khan 1717-1727
Nawab Muhammad Shuja Khan 1727-1739 Nawab Sarfaraz Khan 1739-1740 Nawab Alivardi Khan 1740-1756 Nawab Siraj Ud Doullah 1756-1757 When the fighting soldiers saw their leaders withdrawing themselves from the battlefield they lost heart and fled in all directions. Within few moments the course of the battle turned for the worst. Amid terrible attack from Clive’s side and with his army in panic Siraj fled from the battle field for life but was captured on his way to Patna. He was brought back to Murshidabad and murdered by Muhammadi Beg upon the order of Miran, son of Mir jafar. Siraj-ud-Daulah’s guns on wooden trucks pulled by oxen and pushed by elephants at the Battle of Plassey on 23rd June 1757 in the Anglo-French Wars in India: picture by Richard Caton Woodville SIGNIFICANCE OF THE BATTTLE OF PLASSEY- BATTLE OF BAXUR 1. Mir Jafar became Nawab only in name, real power was with the English East India Company. 2. The Company got the Zamindari of the 24 Parganahs 3. After the battle the English East India Company got the exclusive right to trade at the expense of other European companies. 4. The English Company gradually acquired the political power in the country. 5. After the battle, the English emerged as the de facto ruler of the country and controlled its political fate. 6. When in 1765 the English acquired the Diwani, they became the real ruler of the country. 7. The plundering of Bengal resources continued by the British. 8. Capturing of the region‟s flourishing opium trade. 9. Rise of British colonial rule & opium trade in South Asia. 10. Destruction of the cotton textile & Muslin industries of Eastern Bengal. 11. Tremendous economic hardship for the Bengali people in a land of balance economy. 12. Compelled farmers to convert fertile paddy lands to grow opium poppies & indigo. 13. Famine caused the death of 10 million people Bengal in 1770. 14. In 1793, Lord Cornwallis introduced the „Permanent Settlement‟ & land came under the private ownership of the Hindu zamindars. 15. Divide & Rule policy pursued by the British. PLASSEY Concluding Remarks The discussions made above indicated that the very reason why the BEIC invaded the Kingdom of Bengal was establishing their supremacy in the regional drug trade. For attaining their strategic goals, they used every possible measures, including doddery, deceiving & hypocrisy & managed to capture power in Bengal & rest of South Asia in defense of their drug trade. Besides colonial plundering for making fortune, they also pursued divide & rule policy for subjugating & exploiting local people on a long term basis. Further Readings: 1. M. Emdadul Haq, Drugs in South Asia: From the Opium Trade to the Present Day (Palgrave Macmillan, UK & St. Martin’s Press, USA, 2000). 2. M. Emdadul Haq, Colonial Drug Trade in South Asia: from Palashi to Partition (Century Publications, 2nd edition, 2019). 3. Sirajul Islam (ed.), History of Bangladesh 1704-1971, Volume 1, (Dhaka: Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, 1997) THANK YOU