POSITION PAPER FOR

SALAM MUN 2021 –

Organization Of Islamic Cooperation
(OIC)

Country : Islamic Republic of Pakistan

Council : OIC
Topic : Relations Development Between Arab Countries and Israel: A Subtle
Backstabbing for Palestinse
Name : Siskarisna

“Acts of terror committed by a government is still terrorism.”

― Abhijit Naskar, Hometown Human: To Live for Soil and Society

In the past year and several years, many countries have begun to recognize the existence
of Israel and also began to normalize relations with Israel it has also been mentioned by the
United States as a country that does exist in favor of Israel. According to the ASPI analysis,
Israel's success in establishing diplomatic relations or friendly realtions with 4 Arab countries so
far indicates that the Palestinian issue or Palestine-Israel conflict is no longer considered or
recognize important by some Arab Country. It is also impressive that "selling" Palestinians
openly no longer affects their legitimacy within their respective countries. In this case, First, the
U.S. plays a leading role as an intermediary, selling weapons and meeting other demands that
have to do with their interests. Second, hostilities towards Iran, especially in the Gulf are
paramount in pushing the official diplomatic of Arab countries with Israel. As an Islamic state,
and as a fellow Islamic state and also a country that rejects the various occupations that exist in
the world. Pakistan rejects and condemns what Israel does to Palestine. And also when the
declaration of independence was announced in 1948, and also the founding party of Israel
contacted directly to Pakistan, Pakistan did not respond to Israel and also although Pakistan has
no conflict or problem with Israel, Pakistan will remain to disown Israel.
The UN has done some work to help resolve the conflict between the Palestinians and
also Israel. One of them is to conduct investigations in Israel as well as Palestine but it is
intended for one of the attacks that Israel has carried out on Gaza is not attacks that have been
going on for a long time from the beginning of this conflict. But the U.N. also said it had done
some work to end the conflict. But the UN called for that "There is no doubt that Israel has the
right to defend it citizent and residents. However, Palestinians also have rights too. The same
rights" So this is mean that UN knew and recognize the existence of a country of Israel, that we
can not accept this point, who even occupation Palestine but The UN can't do much to get it
done. There was also a Madrid peace conference held in 1991 to help resolve the conflict but it
was still difficult to digest or understand.
The main reasons for Pakistan's policy towards Israel are first is because of religious
solidarity with another Muslim Arab countries. Secondly, is because fear of the negative
reactions of radical Islamic groups in the Muslim world. Lastly, fearing that the establishment of
diplomatic ways with Israel will cause instability or situation that not balance in Pakistan. And
also Pakistan's political and military leaders will always have worked to reconcile with their
radical clerics and are likely to stick to Pakistan's Muslim identity. Once again, Pakistan doesn’t
recognize the state of Israel and has repeatedly called for an independent Palestinian state based
on "internationally agreed parameters" and a pre-1967 border with Al-Quds Al-Sharif as its
capital.
There are actually many unilateral actions that Israel take to reduce the possibility of
peace. One of the most dangerous unilateral steps that for a two-state solution is the annexation
of parts of the West Bank such as the Jordan Valley. Although the number is smaller, the
Palestinians also actually have several options to take some unilateral actions, such as the
termination of the previous agreement or the dismantling of the PA. If the two-state solution
proves impossible, the Israeli side may see some form of Palestinian autonomy proposal under
Israeli control, the "minus" approved by the Israeli right-wing majority. A variation of the
approach.

REFERENCE
Berrebi, C., & Klor, E. F. (2006). On terrorism and electoral outcomes: Theory and
evidence from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Journal of conflict resolution, 50(6), 899-925.
Greenberg, J. D. (2005). Generations of memory: remembering partition in India/Pakistan
and Israel/Palestine. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 25(1), 89-
110.
Khilji, S. E., Zeidman, N., Drory, A., Tirmizi, A., & Srinivas, E. S. (2010).
Crossvergence of values: An analysis of the use of impression management strategies in India,
Israel and Pakistan. International Business Review, 19(4), 419-431.
Milton-Edwards, B. (2008). The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: A People's War. Routledge.
Ron, Y., & Maoz, I. (2013). Dangerous stories: Encountering narratives of the other in
the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 19(3), 281.