Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Arthquake Asics: Liquefaction What It Is and What To Do About It
Arthquake Asics: Liquefaction What It Is and What To Do About It
1 LIQUEFACTION
Liquefaction Process
■ Purpose Liquefaction is a process by which sedi-
This pamphlet, the first in a series, has ments below the water table temporarily lose
been written by members of the Earthquake strength and behave as a viscous liquid rather
Engineering Research Institute (EERI) to
than a solid. The types of sediments most sus-
explain the phenomenon of liquefaction and
ceptible are clay-free deposits of sand and silts;
what can be done about it. This brief is in-
occasionally, gravel liquefies. The actions in the
tended for other EERI members, and local
officials, public policymakers, and proper- soil which produce liquefaction are as follows:
ty owners who are faced with decisions seismic waves, primarily shear waves, passing
regarding the hazard of liquefaction. It is through saturated granular layers, distort the
not intended to replace evaluations con- granular structure, and cause loosely packed
ducted by a geotechnical expert to assess groups of particles to collapse (Figure 1). These
the hazard at any particular site. The dis- collapses increase the pore-water pressure be-
cussion on the liquefaction process and its tween the grains if drainage cannot occur. If the
effects on the built environment is primari- pore-water pressure rises to a level approach-
ly meant for the design engineer. The dis- ing the weight of the overlying soil, the granu-
cussion on options for mitigation, lar layer temporarily behaves as a viscous liquid
preparedness, response, and recovery is pri- rather than a solid. Liquefaction has occurred.
marily aimed at policymakers. However,
the effort was made to explain both the
In the liquefied condition, soil may deform
process and its public policy implications to with little shear resistance; deformations large
all readers. enough to cause damage to buildings and other
structures are called ground failures. The ease
This brief is meant to be used with two with which a soil can be liquefied depends
slide sets that illustrate (1) the phenom- primarily on the looseness of the soil, the amount
enon of liquefaction and (2) mitigation op- of cementing or clay between particles, and the
tions for liquefaction. The authors hope
amount of drainage restriction. The amount of
that the information presented here con-
soil deformation following liquefaction de-
veys, to policymakers in particular, that
pends on the looseness of the material, the
better understanding of the risk from lique-
faction at a particular site or area leads to depth, thickness, and areal extent of the lique-
better decisions regarding mitigation op- fied layer, the ground slope, and the distribu-
tions, response planning, and preparedness tion of loads applied by buildings and other
strategies. With good liquefaction opportu- structures.
nity and susceptibility maps as a starting Liquefaction does not occur at random, but
point, public officials and private property is restricted to certain geologic and hydrologic
owners can make informed decisions about environments, primarily recently deposited
how to concentrate limited resources to sands and silts in areas with high ground water
manage and reduce the risk.
levels. Generally, the younger and looser the
1
EARTHQUAKE BASICS BRIEF NO. 1
2
LIQUEFACTION
3
EARTHQUAKE BASICS BRIEF NO. 1
4
LIQUEFACTION
develop an opportunity map, an earthquake of existing structures) so that the ground move-
source model is required that includes locations ments do not adversely affect the structure
of seismic source zones and quantitative esti- (e.g., mat foundation to increase a foundation’s
mates of the number and magnitude of the rigidity; deep piles or piers that extend below a
expected earthquakes in those zones. zone of liquefiable soil);
These maps can be used in a variety of
ways. At the local level in California, they have (3) stabilize soil to eliminate the potential for
been incorporated as background documents liquefaction or to control its effects (e.g., remov-
in safety elements of the general plans that al and replacement of liquefiable soils; in situ
cities and counties are required to prepare. stab-ilization by grouting, densification, or de-
Although still not widely incorporated, infor- watering; buttressing of lateral spread zones).
mation from these maps could also be trans-
lated into codes and ordinances. For example, How Is the Choice of Mitigation
the City of San Diego has developed and adopt- Options Made?
ed provisions for the liquefaction hazard in its The choice of mitigation options depends
building code. very much on the particular characteristics of
the site. If there is not a significant lateral
At the state level, the California Division of
movement hazard, mitigation for a new facility
Mines and Geology is mapping liquefaction
is largely a matter of finding the most cost-
hazard zones throughout the state (CDMG,
effective solution to providing vertical support
1992). These zones are defined as areas meeting
and control settlement. For existing facilities,
one or more of the following criteria:
mitigation is generally more difficult and ex-
(1) areas known to have experienced lique- pensive because of the presence of the struc-
faction during historic earthquakes; ture. Techniques that densify the soil may be
(2) all areas of uncompacted fills contain- precluded for an existing facility because they
ing liquefaction-susceptible material that are would cause settlement of the structure.
saturated, nearly saturated, or can be expected When a lateral spreading hazard is present,
to become saturated; the mitigating measures, to be effective, may in
(3) areas where sufficient existing geotech- some cases need to be employed beyond the
nical data and analyses indicate that the soils boundary of the specific site. This may pre-
are potentially liquefiable; clude effective mitigation by an individual prop-
erty owner, requiring instead action by public
(4) areas underlain with saturated geo- entities or groups of property owners.
logically young sediments (younger than
10,000 to 15,000 years old). Does Mitigation Work?
Several different ground improvement tech-
Individual properties within these hazard niques have been used for sites identified as
zones will eventually be required to obtain a having the potential for liquefaction. For exam-
site-specific geotechnical investigation to de- ple, several sites had been improved in Trea-
fine the liquefaction potential. sure Island, Santa Cruz, Richmond, Emeryville,
What Are the Options for Mitigation? Bay Farm Island, Union City, and South San
There are various ways to mitigate a poten- Francisco, California, prior to the Loma Prieta
tial liquefaction hazard: earthquake in 1989. The sites where ground
improvements were carried out had little or no
(1) strengthen structures to resist predicted damage to either the ground or facilities built
ground movements (if small); upon the improved sites even though they
(2) select appropriate foundation type and depth experienced peak ground accelerations rang-
(including foundation modifications in the case ing from 0.11g to 0.45g. In contrast, untreated
5
EARTHQUAKE BASICS BRIEF NO. 1
ground adjacent to these improved sites spread, vulnerable to liquefaction. Sites where lique-
oscillated, or settled, due primarily to liquefac- faction can cause major problems can be identi-
tion (Leighton and Associates, 1993). fied using the liquefaction hazard or risk maps
discussed above. Emergency plans might want
Is It Possible to Prepare for Liquefaction?
to specify a reconnaissance survey of these
Reducing vulnerability and improving
areas immediately after an earthquake occurs.
emergency response capabilities are two op-
Problems resulting from liquefaction such as
tions to pursue in preparing for the possibility
damage to underground pipelines also need to
of liquefaction. With hazard zone maps, it is
be factored into any emergency response plan-
possible to identify areas potentially subject to
ning. Emergency responders should expect
liquefaction and to identify areas of minor and
interrupted water supply, and natural gas and
major concern. Emphasis in terms of develop-
sewage leaks. Back-up sources of water need to
ing appropriate public policy or selecting miti-
be identified or developed. In addition, the
gation techniques should be in areas of major
roadbeds in areas potentially subject to lique-
concern. (An example of an area of major
faction may be seriously damaged, greatly com-
concern in the San Francisco Bay area would be
plicating the ability to evacuate residents or to
bay lands reclaimed by placing uncompacted
bring in emergency response equipment. These
fill under water.)
systems should have redundancy or alterna-
Public and private property owners can use tives.
hazards maps to understand where the most
What Are the Implications for Recovery?
serious damage can be expected and what struc-
Recovery and rebuilding in areas that have
tures are most vulnerable. This information, in
experienced damage due to liquefaction raise
turn, can be used to decide where limited re-
some special issues. One of the first decisions
sources should be concentrated--and what mit-
policymakers in the community face is whether
igation strategies, if any, should be adopted.
to allow rebuilding in the damaged area. In the
City and county governments can also use this
United States, it is most common for a jurisdic-
information to decide if they want to regulate
tion to allow rebuilding, but with additional
the risk through ordinance or code changes. If
restrictions such as requiring detailed site in-
adequate maps exist, local governments could
vestigations and possibly engineered founda-
designate liquefaction potential areas, and re-
tions. The individual property owner also needs
quire, by ordinance, site investigations and
to decide if repair and rebuilding are feasible,
possible mitigation techniques for properties in
particularly from a financial perspective. The
these areas. Additional engineering could be
community, usually a city or county, will need
required for new construction; essential servic-
to decide if some sort of large- scale soil stabili-
es buildings could be strengthened or relocat-
zation project should be attempted during re-
ed; and additional redundancy could be built
building; one important determinant in this
into lifelines systems, particularly underground
decision is the availability of funding. In gen-
pipes and critical transportation routes.
eral, for both individual property owners and
A call to the closest office of the U.S. Geolog- public entities, it is much less expensive to
ical Survey is a first step in identifying available reduce vulnerability to liquefaction before an
information. Liquefaction hazard zone maps, earthquake than it is to pay for repair or retrofit
which are at the basis of developing regulatory measures after an earthquake. Once a commu-
strategies and other mitigation options, already nity is in the process of rebuilding, community
exist for some of the most seismically active leaders and individual property owners should
areas in the country. take advantage of every opportunity to miti-
What Are the Implications for Response? gate the liquefaction risk. ■
Emergency response plans at the local juris-
dictional level need to identify those areas most
6
LIQUEFACTION
References
January, 1994
7
EARTHQUAKE BASICS BRIEF N
A publication of
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
499 14th Street, Suite 320
Oakland, California 94612-1902
Phone (510) 451-0905
Fax (510) 451-5411