You are on page 1of 6

LAPORAN HASIL TELAAH KRITIS

PENILAIAN AKHIR MK BERPIKIR KRITIS

Nama :
NIM :

Artikel Penelitian 1
Judul :
Tahun Publikasi :
Penulis :
Desain Penelitian :
Level evidence : I / II / III / IV / V*
Hasil telaah sebagai berikut:
*(coret yang tidak sesuai)

2
Tool telaah kritis CASP untuk Systematic Review (Meta Analysis)

Paper for appraisal and reference:


Section A: Are the results of the review valid?

Yes HINT: An issue can be ‘focused’ In terms


1. Did the review address
of
a clearly focused Can’t • the population studied
question?
• the intervention given
Tell
• the outcome considered
No

Comments:

HINT: ‘The best sort of studies’ would


2. Did the authors look for Yes
the right type of papers?  address the review’s question
Can’t  have an appropriate study
design (usually RCTs for papers
Tell evaluating
interventions)
No
Comments:

Is it worth continuing?

3. Do you think all the


important, relevant HINT: Look for
studies were included? • which bibliographic databases were
Yes
used
Can’t • follow up from reference lists
• personal contact with experts
Tell • unpublished as well as published
studies
No • non-English language studies

Comments:

2
4. Did the review’s authors Yes HINT: The authors need to consider
the rigour of the studies they have
do enough to assess
Can’t identified. Lack of rigour may affect the
quality of the included
studies’ results (“All that glisters is not
studies?
Tell gold” Merchant of Venice – Act II
Scene 7)
No

Comments:

HINT: Consider
5. If the results of the review
have been combined, was Yes whether esults were similar from
it reasonable to do so? study to study
Can’t
• results of all the included studies are
clearly displayed
Tell
• results of different studies are similar
No • reasons for any variations in results
are
discussed

Comments:

Section B: What are the results?

6. What are the overall results of the review? HINT: Consider


• If you are clear about the review’s
‘bottom line’ results
• what these are (numerically if
appropriate)
• how were the results expressed (NNT,
odds ratio etc.)

Comments:

2
7. How precise are the results? HINT: Look at the confidence
intervals,
if
give
n

Comments:

Section C: Will the results help locally?


Yes HINT: Consider whether
8. Can the results be applied
to the local population?  the patients covered by the
Can’t review could be sufficiently different
to your population to cause concern
Tell  your local setting is likely to differ much
from that of the review
No

Comments:

9. Were all important HINT: Consider whether


outcomes considered?  there is other information you would
Yes like to have seen

Can’t

Tell

Comments: No

10. Are the benefits worth HINT: Consider


the harms and costs?  even if this is not addressed by
the review, what do you
think?
Yes

Can’t

Tell

No

2
Comments:

2
Artikel Penelitian 2
Judul :
Tahun Publikasi :
Penulis :
Desain Penelitian :
Level evidence : I / II / III / IV / V*
Hasil telaah sebagai berikut:
*(coret yang tidak sesuai)

JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR CASE REPORTS


Yes No Uncle Not
ar applicabl
e
1.
Were patient’s demographic characteristics clearly
described? □ □ □ □
2.
Was the patient’s history clearly described and
presented as a timeline? □ □ □ □
3.
Was the current clinical condition of the patient on
presentation clearly described? □ □ □ □
4.
Were diagnostic tests or assessment methods and
the results clearly described? □ □ □ □
5. Was the intervention(s) or treatment procedure(s)
clearly described? □ □ □ □
6.
Was the post-intervention clinical condition clearly
described? □ □ □ □
7.
Were adverse events (harms) or unanticipated
events identified and described? □ □ □ □
8.
Does the case report provide takeaway lessons? □ □ □ □
Overall appraisal: Include □ Exclude □
Seek further info □
Comments (Including reason for exclusion)
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________

You might also like