“TEACHER’S INFLUENCE TO

THE CHOSEN STRAND

OF SHS STUDENTS”

GROUP 5
12Humss-B.Francisco
Researcher Proposal Presented by:

(Group 5)
Christine Mae Abobo
Alexandra Nicole Cruz
Shiela Mae Miana
Ernest Ynrique Codamos
John Maeric Elejido
Prince Jerald Alfonso Omaña IV
Andrei Justin Sevilla
 Chapter 1
Introduction
Teachers change lives, there would be changes in any different
aspects. In education, a teacher makes their students to learn and
engage lessons that will lead for academic success of the students.

According to Jiela (2019), most of the time, teachers have a biggest

impact to the students. The students are likely to trust his/her
teacher more, they will learn, they will be inspired, and they will
be protected. Teachers act as our second parents in school we’re so
comfortable with them in our learning journey.
 However, the chosen strand on the other hand, teachers make a
biggest influence to their student and to help them create their
plans in the future. Students have a strong relationship with their
teachers will gain higher level of achievements that will lead for
their success and teacher’s influence to the students to have a
better future and always for a good of one’s student.

Choosing a career is important because it determines your

success in the next stage of your life. So, students should be study
hard because in future students don’t know how will be her/his life
in next generation.
 Statement of the Problem
The problem of this research is the determination of the relationship
between teacher’s influences to the chosen strand of SHS students. This
research study wants to answer the following research questions:

1. What is the profile of the subjects in terms of:

1.1Strand
2. In what teachers aspect influence you to choose your strand:
a. Teaching
b. Gender
c. Ideologist
d. Etc.
3. What is the significant relationships between teacher’s influences
to the chosen strand of SHS Students?
 Hypothesis

𝐇𝐨𝟏

There is no significant relationship between

the teacher’s influence and the chosen strand.
 Theoretical Framework
The following discussions presented theories that justifies
this research and provided the intellectual backbone for the
purpose of this study.

Gottfredson’s theory

Occupational aspirations are a reflection of one’s self-concept.

People seek occupations that (a) arc congruent with their self-
image and (b) reflect their knowledge of different occupations.
This theory describes that students become attracted to certain
specialization. According to this theory, self-concept is the key to
specialization selection. Students tend to choose jobs that are
compatible with their personality.
Students tend to choose jobs that are compatible with their
personality. The key determinants according to the theory are
one’s social class, level of intelligence and experiences with sex
typing. In the study of Siguan Jr., (1994) as cited in Sonsona
(2012) self-concept was also found significant on the choice of
specialization of students. Another is Holland’s theory of career
choice suggested that people can function and develop best and
find jobs satisfaction in work environments that are compatible
with their personalities. People tend to choose a career that is
reflective of their personality. Holland (1994), suggest that the
closer the match of personality to job, the greater the satisfaction.
Holland’s theory places emphasis on the accuracy of self-
knowledge and career information necessary for career decision
making (Zunker, 1994 p. 49) as cited inAbernathy (2003)
This theory, developed by Linda Gottfredson in 1981, attempts to
describe how career choice develops in young people. Many
developmental theories focus on how an individual’s self concept
develops with age. Circumscription and Compromise also focuses
on the development of an individual’s view of the occupational
choices available. Gottfredson proposes that when people are
forced to compromise their career choices, they are more likely
compromise first on field of work, then on social level and lastly on
sex-type as the amount of compromise increases. This prediction
has been the most controversial with some research seeming to
offer limited support (e.g. Blanchard & Lichtenberg, 2003) and
some to challenge it (e.g. Hesketh et al., 1990).
 Conceptual Framework of the Study

The paradigm of the study shown in figure 1 illustrated

the conceptual framework of the study. This study illuminated the
relationship teacher's influence to the chosen strand of SHS
students in Eusebio High School. The frame shows the
relationship and the actual pattern that is use in the study
 INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT

• SHS Students • Approval of • Teacher’s

influence to the
• Questionnaire questionnaire chosen strand
of SHS
students
Figure 1: The Conceptual Paradigm of the Study showing
the teachers’ influence to the chosen strand of SHS
students.

The first frame shows the what are the tools that we
use to easily gather the information by using Input: SHS
students and Questionnaire.
The second frame illustrate the process which is
approval of
questionnaire.
The last frame Elucidate the output of the study:
Teacher's influence to the chosen strand of SHS students.
 Chapter 2
Synthesis of the Reviewed Related
Literature and Studies
The related literature and studies greatly help the
researcher understand the other opinion of the author
about teacher influence and choosing strans of SHS
students. All obtained literature and studies on the
different sources is significance and has a lessons.
 To some opinion, particularly writers like Villanueva,
Mtemiri, Anuada, Manapsal mentioned that Career Guidance is
good for students to make decisions, if has career guidance
students can make decision easily. Career guidance is a program
that assist individual students in making and inform educational
the students to their want in future.

Choosing strand is not easy because you want in future is

contained here. But, what if you dont know what is your like in
future or what do you want in future. So, career guidance is
important to help students to make a right decisions about their
choices and pathways.
 In contrast, several authors, namely Ramos, Braza, Quano,
Kavanoz, Gestiada bring up a lesson about choosing a strand.
Choosing a strand can ve satisfying if you have made a right choice.
If you coice that you don't want it can leave you wishing that you
had trodden a different path. So, students need to choice wisely on
their choosing strand, students must know them personality and
life goals to easily know what do you like or according to your
dream you want in life.

There is different opinion in each author. However, that has a

destination, just be diligent and find out what you want in future.
Thus, it iscrucial to publish mote studies to easily understand this,
especially in Eusebio High School.
And so this study serves as the framework of a pioneering
study targeting the relationship between the teacher’s
influence to the chosen Strand of SHS students.
 Chapter 3

Methods of Research
A descriptive research method is describing the behaviour of
the respondents. The researcher will use descriptive research
design to determine the relationship between the teacher's
influences to the chosen strand of SHS students. This study
focuses on the perception Of the SHS students. The research
designs are collect and examine the data.
 A descriptive research method is describing the behaviour of
the respondents and together with correlation research method to
identify if there’s a relationship between the teacher influence and
the chosen strand of SHS students. The researchers gather the
data in order to answer the research study.

The research aims to know if the teacher's influence the SHS

students to their chosen strand and to correlate the relationship of
the teachers influence and chosen strand of SHS students.
Population, Sample Size and Sampling
Technique

The respondents are selected on SHS students in any

strand in eusebio high school. The researcher will use the
simple random technique it is a type of probability sampling
method where we select a group of subjects for study from a
large group. Each individual is chosen randomly and each
individual has the same probability.
The sample size was determining using slovin's formula follow
by:

Where:

n= sample size
N= population size
e= margin of error