Eti 2017 Palmoilindustryin South East Asiaandtheeffluenttreatmenttechnology Areview

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/321633853
Palm oil industry in South East Asia and the efﬂuent treatment technology—A
review
Article in Environmental Technology & Innovation · December 2017

DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2017.11.003
CITATIONS READS
2 3,207
4 authors:
Muhammad Johan Iskandar Zahari Azizah Baharum

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
4 PUBLICATIONS 9 CITATIONS 17 PUBLICATIONS 75 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE
Farah Hannan Anuar Rizafizah Othaman

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
20 PUBLICATIONS 19 CITATIONS 62 PUBLICATIONS 155 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Effectiveness of ENR/PVC/Cellulose membrane to treat Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) View project
Edible Films View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Rizafizah Othaman on 12 January 2018.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Environmental Technology & Innovation 9 (2018) 169–185
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Environmental Technology & Innovation

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/eti
Palm oil industry in South East Asia and the effluent

treatment technology—A review✩
Muhammad Johan Iskandar a , Azizah Baharum a,b , Farah Hannan Anuar a,b ,
Rizafizah Othaman a,b, *
a
School of Chemical Science and Food Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
b
Polymer Research Center, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
graphical abstract
highlights
• Palm Oil Industry is one of the biggest industry in South East Asia.
• Larger demand for palm oil will generate more by-product or waste.
• The conventional method POME treatment is inefficient and causing a pollution.
• Alternative treatment technology is found to be the best solution to solve this problem.
article info a b s t r a c t
Article history: The progress of Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) treatment in meeting with the regulation and
Received 24 May 2017 standard stipulated by the Environmental Authority always been a major issue in Palm
✩ This manuscript aims to discuss the palm oil industry in South East Asia, recent treatment and alternative treatment for the waste from this industry.
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: rizafizah@ukm.edu.my (R. Othaman).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2017.11.003
2352-1864/© 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
170 M.J. Iskandar et al. / Environmental Technology & Innovation 9 (2018) 169–185
Received in revised form 25 October 2017 oil industries. To occupy the palm oil world market demand, palm oil industry needs to
Accepted 7 November 2017 produce more than the market demand to supply necessity. Currently, South East Asia
Available online 5 December 2017 country such as Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand rank the top country with the largest
production of palm oil in the world. However, the increasing demand for the palm oil has
Keywords:
resulted in even massive waste especially palm oil mill effluent (POME). Direct discharge
Palm oil
POME
of POME will adversely affect the environment. In 2011, 53 million tonnes metric of palm
Membrane oil produced and 89% of this production comes from Malaysia and Indonesia. Thailand,
Aerobic digestion however, used the palm oil solely for domestic usage. Since POME has been declared
Anaerobic digestion among the major source of pollution, a great deal of research and development including
Physicochemical application devoted to enhance the current treatment method for POME to consistently
meet the proposed stringent regulatory requirement by environmental authority. Con-
ventional treatment such as ponding system is the most commonplace method to treat
POME through the application of ponding system which is include aerobic and anaerobic
treatment. Recently, the alternative methods such as coagulation, flocculation, adsorption,
advanced oxidation process (AOP) and membrane technology to treat POME has shown a
promising result compared to the conventional method.
© 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Contents
1. Introduction............................................................................................................................................................................................. 170
2. Oil processing and waste ........................................................................................................................................................................ 172
2.1. Oil processing ............................................................................................................................................................................. 172
2.1.1. FFB reception and transfer ......................................................................................................................................... 172
2.1.2. FFB sterilization .......................................................................................................................................................... 173
2.1.3. Threshing, digesting and screw-pressing.................................................................................................................. 173
2.1.4. Depericarping.............................................................................................................................................................. 173
2.1.5. Clarification of crude palm oil (CPO) ......................................................................................................................... 173
2.1.6. Kernel separation and drying..................................................................................................................................... 173
2.2. Waste .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 174
3. Characteristic of Palm Oil Mill Effluent ................................................................................................................................................. 174
4. Conventional Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) treatment technologies ................................................................................................ 175
5. Alternative Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) treatment technologies .................................................................................................... 176
6. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 180
References ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 181
1. Introduction
At present, the palm oil mill industry is being dominated by the Southeast Asia region. Possessing to its suitability to
regional climatic conditions and high yield rates, palm oil is the main biodiesel feedstock in Southeast Asia (Mukherjee and
Sovacool, 2014). Since the 14th century it was introduced in this region, palm oil has become an important agricultural
commodity, especially Malaysia and Indonesia which has dominating this industry since the mid-1960s (Mukherjee and
Sovacool, 2014). Palm oil has been recognized as the most utilized vegetable oil globally with the total production up to 40%
compared to the other vegetable oil (Hansen et al., 2015; Oosterveer, 2015). Fig. 1 shows the world palm oil production
in 2017 (Index Mundi, 2017). Currently, Malaysia and Indonesia are the world’s biggest palm oil producers where the
production of both countries is 85% of the world palm oil production. Taking after the rundown is Thailand where it
contributes 4% of the world palm oil production (Foreign Agricultural Service, 2005). In 2011 palm oil plantations produced
over 53 million metric tonnes of palm oil on 16 million hectares that have been contributed by Indonesia and Malaysia (86%),
where palm oil is a key economic driver and is a crucial component of GDP (SSI review, 2014). Malaysia has issued almost
39% and 44% of global palm oil production and global export for palm oil. Over the past half century, palm oil has made an
astounding and consistent development in the worldwide market and it is estimated in the time of 2016–2020, the yearly
production of Malaysia palm oil will achieve 15.4 tonnes (Teoh, 2000). In 2017, there are 453 operating mills in Malaysia
where 245 mills are located in Peninsular whereas 208 is located in Sabah and Sarawak (MPOB, 2017). Currently, Malaysia
has produced 21,000 metric tonnes of palm oil (Index Mundi, 2017).
As for the Thailand, the palm oil industry has started to monopoly the vegetable oil production and it has been proved
by the increasing planting and harvesting area for palm oil that is 9.7% (Dallinger, 2011). Thailand is among the countries
which has started to revolutionize the usage of palm oil as the main vegetable oil since the last decade (Silalertruksa et
al., 2016) due to the cheaper prices compared to the other oil with the advantages that can be used as a food or non-
food product (Ludin et al., 2014; MPOB, 2013). Surprisingly, starting that date, palm oil plantation in Thailand has enlarged
and the plantation area has tripled from the previous (FAOSTAT, 2016; OAE, 2016). Furthermore, palm oil in Thailand has
demonstrated a promising future where it covers 70% of the vegetable palm oil market domestically (Chavalparit et al.,
M.J. Iskandar et al. / Environmental Technology & Innovation 9 (2018) 169–185 171
Fig. 1. World palm oil production in 2017 (Index Mundi, 2017).
2006). The production of vegetable oil annually is approximately 150 million metrics which is one-third of the production
of the palm oil (FAO, 2013). Apart from that, the Thailand palm oil industry in 2010 has been operated by 14 bio-diesel
plants, 12 palm oil refineries and more than 60 palm oil crushing mill and it is forecasted that these numbers will keep
increasing annually (Dallinger, 2011). More than half states in Thailand are currently been planted with palm oil which is
60 from 76 states (OAE, 2014a,b). Pure palm oil is not permitted to be traded in Thailand by the government hence 100%
of the oil production is being utilized exclusively for domestic consumption (Preecharjarn and Prasertsri, 2012). The palm
oil consumption in Thailand is divided into three parts, which is for edible oil, cosmetic and biodiesel. The local demand for
edible oil and cosmetic was plateau while demand for biodiesel has increased 6% as compared to year 2012 (DIT, 2014). The
palm oil plantation in Thailand has become a very serious industry since the Ministry of Energy has launched a policy that is
an Alternative Energy Development Plan 2015–2036, AEDP to enhance the production of biodiesel (DEDE, 2012) which has
been supported by Ministry of Agricultures and Cooperatives (MOAC) for the palm oil plantation addition (OAE, 2014a,b).
Driven by the demand from importing nations such as India, China and member states of EU, palm oil has become the
most extensively traded vegetables oil globally in the mid-2000s (Sheil et al., 2009). This development and expansion have
persuaded the legislature to provide over 20 million hectares of land for the new palm oil estate, which is 330% augmentation
over the present land area under agriculture (Milder et al., 2008). Palm oil industry in Indonesia has ballooned from 6.7 Mha to
9 Mha from 1990 to 2013 and majority of the plantation are in Sumatra and Kalimantan (Deptan, 2014). In parallel, between
the year of 1990 to 2005, it is reported that palm oil planting area has increased by 3,017,00 ha (FAO, 2007). According to
USDA, the export of CPO has increased from 5 to 25.5 Mt while the consumption of CPO has increased from 3 to 9.5 Mt from
the year 2000 to 2017 (USDA, 2017). With the production exceeded 19,324 million crude palm oil (CPO), the industry in
Indonesia is predicted to emit 15.61 × 106 of greenhouse gas (Tong, 2011). On the other hand, Indonesian Palm Oil Research
Institute (PPPK) has aimed for 26% oil extraction rate (OER) (PPKS, 2014) to support the production of palm oil locally. The
high demand of palm oil in Indonesia might be due to population expansion, consumption level, and renewable energy
interest (Afriyanti et al., 2016).
It is clearly shown that there is an increasing trend of the production of the world palm oil by Malaysia, Indonesia,
and Thailand (Fig. 2). The crude palm oil (CPO) produced from this industry will generate cooking oil (Corley, 2009) and
biodiesel (IEA, 2011). However, the leading trend and development of palm oil industry in these countries have led to a
catastrophic environmental issue. This scenario has been condemned by the society as the result of deforestation as well
as disturbing the nature of current exhibit flora and fauna (SSI review, 2014). Tan et al. (2009) reported that 25% of palm
oil site in Indonesia is being planted on peat soil, which leads to the emission of carbon through an oxidation process. This
statement has been supported by a report stating that 17% and 63% of new plantation in Malaysia and Indonesia has been
caused by the deforestation of tropical forest starting from 1990–2010 (Gunarso et al., 2013; Koh et al., 2011) and 30% of this
plantation occurred on peat soil which leads to huge CO2 emission (Carlson et al., 2012; Miettinen et al., 2012; Omar et al.,
2010). There are some factor to be included upon planning on a biofuel production such as energy balance, greenhouse gas
emission, land use efficiency and water use (Nonhebel, 2005; Dale, 2007; Prueksakorn and Gheewala, 2008; Gerbens-Leenes
et al., 2009).
The Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) was established in 2004 to promote sustainable production of palm oil
worldwide. The RSPO objective is to encourage the growth and use of the sustainable palm oil products through trustworthy
global standard and engagement of stakeholders. Since the presence of palm oil industries has caused an environmental
issue, the principle and criteria of RSPO were used as a reference. Apart from RSPO, the Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB),
Malaysia Palm Oil Council (MPOC) and Ministry of Plantation Industries and Commodities (MPIC) are present to oversee
all the matters regarding palm oil industry. A ‘Small Renewable Energy Power Program’ has been launch in 2000 by the
Malaysian Government to restore and reuse all the wastes from palm oil industry and utilized them for electricity generation.
Fig. 2. Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand Palm Oil Production by Year (Index Mundi, 2017).
Apart from that, the Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) has been implemented in Malaysia in 2014 with the same
objective and function as others (Adnan, 2013).
In Thailand, Good Agricultural Practice standard (Thai Gap) was developed in 2010 to monitor issues related to Thai
palm oil including the usage of pesticide, water, and fertilizer application. This initiative was introduced to reduce the
environmental impact caused by the palm oil industry. In 2011, the implementation of Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil
(ISPO) has been set as a standard rivaling the RSPO (Mukherjee and Sovacool, 2014). It is designed to be a mandatory
certification for all palm oil producers in Indonesia. Whereas, The Ministry of Plantation Industries and Commodities (MPIC)
had announced in 2006, the RM20 million Malaysia Palm Oil Conservation Fund (MPOCF) had been initiated with aims to
help preserve affected wildlife and to sustain biodiversity conservation program (Abdullah and Sulaiman, 2013).
Despite contributing lot to the agricultural and economic scenario, palm oil mill also significantly contributes to
environmental degradation (Abdullah and Sulaiman, 2013). As a result, the palm waste, which is the byproduct of the
manufacturing process will also escalate. Several studies have revealed that palm oil industries contribute to massive
environmental pollution which includes global warming, biodiversity loss, eutrophication, acidification and photochemical
ozone formation (Saswattecha et al., 2015a). The expanding interests for palm oil in the world market, as well as other
biofuels, has prompted more noteworthy worry over effects on the environment, biodiversity and worldwide climate
(Fargione et al., 2008; James, 2008; Koh and Ghazoul, 2008; Butler and Laurance, 2009). Fiber combustion in the boilers
from the mills itself leads to release of acidifying compound and smog precursor to the open atmosphere (Saswattecha et
al., 2015b). Before the palm oil is being retrieved, there are stages of operation that fresh fruit bunch (FFB) need to undergo.
The uniqueness of the palm tree is it can produce palm oil and palm kernel oil. However, 67% of POME is produced through
these processes.
The idea of this article is to represent a general review, which reconsiders and updates about the palm oil scenario in
Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand, recent treatment processes for palm oil mill effluent (POME) and the latest alternative
techniques. This article also will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the technique used to treat POME along with
some result of the conventional method and alternative method.
2. Oil processing and waste
2.1. Oil processing
The process of retrieving palm oil on a general basis is the same for Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand. However, maybe
some of the factory or industry using the biogas from palm oil process will be having an advanced closed reactor for the
methane build-up collection. Different type of palm oil seeds will yield a different quality of palm oil. Fig. 3 shows a chart
for palm oil extraction and waste generation.
2.1.1. FFB reception and transfer

Fresh fruit bunch (FFB) that are retrieved from the farm is being transported to the mills for processing. In this process,
the FFB will be weight and grade accordingly to their quality. This is important to ensure that further deterioration can be
prevented at the early stage. Then, the FFB will be transferred to the sterilizer.
Fig. 3. Flow chart for typical palm oil extraction process.
2.1.2. FFB sterilization

Once the FFB is received, it will be exposed to high-temperature pressurized steam. The function of the sterilization
process is to inhibit the biological factors which accountable for quality deterioration and loosen the fruit in the bunch for
maximum fruit recovering during stripping and threshing process (Stork, 1960; Olie and Tjeng, 1982; PORIM, 1987; Whiting,
1990; Hamzah, 2008). In addition, the sterilizing process will help to ensure a smooth process of mechanical threshing to
free the palm fruit from the bunches (Liew et al., 2014). Sterilization process stage is crucial in maintaining and ensuring the
success of subsequent stage since it is among the earliest stage in palm oil process (Junaidah et al., 2015).
2.1.3. Threshing, digesting and screw-pressing

Scraper conveyor will transport sterilized FFB to thresher platform. A drum-like machine will rotate and start to strip all
the fruits from the bunch and separate them. Then the desired fruit are transfer into the digester. Digestion is the process of
extracting the palm oil by the mechanism of breaking down the fruit under steam heated condition. In this process, the high
pressure will rupture the oil-bearing cell of the fruits and will be channeled to the twin-screw machine to press out the CPO
(Ahmed et al., 2015).
2.1.4. Depericarping
After the pressing process, press cake is formed. This cake consists of moisture, nuts, and oily fiber. Depericarping process
will then separate the fiber and the nut for the subsequent process.
2.1.5. Clarification of crude palm oil (CPO)

Crude palm oil contains 35%–45% of palm oil, 45%–55% of water and fibrous material after the digestion process (Ahmed
et al., 2015). The CPO will enter clarification tank where it contained rotary strainer and sludge centrifuge to separate the
oil from the CPO solution and will be transferred back to the clarifier. From this process, palm oil mill effluent (POME) is
produced. The recovered oil will be sent to vacuum dryer and storage tank.
2.1.6. Kernel separation and drying

In this process, the nut from depericarping process will undergo separation via winnowing and hydrocyclone process.
This process will involve separation of palm kernel from their shell. The remaining wastewater will be released and the
kernel will be dried in silos.
2.2. Waste
Malaysia has different palm varieties, growth condition, and plantation management compared to Thailand and this will
result in a difference in solid waste. Milling process in Thailand consumed more water throughout the process thus they
will be having a higher amount of wastewater discharge (Kittikul et al., 1994). Unanimous with the huge production of palm
oil, the waste generated will also indirectly increase. Prasertsan and Prasertsan (1996) reported that a solitary palm oil
production can yield over 70% of waste. There are many byproducts from the palm oil processing such as oil palm trunks
(OPT), oil palm fronds (OPF), palm oil mill effluent (POME), fresh fruit bunch (FFB) empty fruit bunches (EFB), palm press
fiber (PPF), shell palm oil mill sludge (POMS), palm kernel cake (PKC) and palm shell (Aziz and Abdul, 2007; Singh et al., 2010;
Abdullah and Sulaiman, 2013). In FFB, Pleanjai et al. (2004) reported that the fiber, shell, decanter cake and EFB account for
30%, 6%, 3%, and 28.3% respectively. For EFB itself, it was reported that it has 42% Carbon, 0.8% Nitrogen, 0.006% Potassium,
2.4% Sodium and 0.2% Magnesium (Krause, 1994).
The advantages of this industries are that it can produce palm oil which is processed from the mesocarp and palm kernel
oil (white palm oil) which is processed from the endosperm. After oil has been extracted from the kernel, it will leave behind
palm kernel cake (PKC). Onwueme and Sinha (1991) reported that the palm kernel cake (PKC) is rich in carbohydrate and
protein that is 48% and 19% respectively. Palm oil mill effluent (POME) has the capability to cause the most dangerous effect
to the environment if not legitimately treated (Rupani et al., 2010; Ahmad et al., 2005a). Around 30 million tonnes of palm
oil mill effluent (POME) is and roughly about 26.7 million tonnes of solid biomass is generated in 2004 solely (Yacob et al.,
2006a,b).
Although there is current ponding system to treat the POME through a series of anaerobic or aerobic pond, unfortunately,
these wastes especially POME does not meet the requirement proposed by the Department of Environment thus putting
the conventional method of effluent treatment as an inefficient method. This phenomenon is surely disrupting the water
ecosystem thus endangering them. The essential of waste management are to reduce and recycle the waste, recover the
energy and finally dispose of the waste (Abdullah and Sulaiman, 2013). The interesting facts about Palm Oil Industry are
that palm oil mill is self-sufficient in energy by using PPF, EFB, and shell as fuel to produce steam in waste-fuel boilers for
processing and power generation with steam turbines (Abdullah and Sulaiman, 2013). Thailand has specific wastewater of
0.87 m3 /ton FFB from palm oil process while Malaysia has the specific wastewater of 0.6 m3 /ton FFB (Hwang et al., 1978).
3. Characteristic of Palm Oil Mill Effluent
Sterilizer condensate, decanter or separator sludge and hydrocyclone waste are among the three major source of
wastewater from palm oil with the value of 17%, 75% and 8%, respectively (Prasertsan and Prasertsan, 1996). POME is a
wastewater comprise of 95%–96% water, 0.6%–0.7% oil and 4%–5% total solids including 2%–4% suspended solids (Khalid and
Wan Mustafa, 1992). POME contain cellulosic material, fat, oil and grease (Rupani et al., 2010) The attributes of the resulting
POME is completely reliant on the operations and quality control of a processing plant. POME is usually had a brown and
pale yellow in color (Bello et al., 2013). Other than having a foul smell, POME also contains organic or natural materials such
as lignin, carotene, phenolic and pectin which is 4700 ppm, 8 ppm, 5800 ppm and 3400 ppm, respectively (Ho et al., 1984;
Sundram et al., 2003).
On the other hand, POME is a colloidal suspension, produce from the mixture of sterilizer condensate, separator sludge,
and hydrocyclone waster in a ratio 9:15:1, respectively (Wu et al., 2010). POME can cause contamination due to the existence
of easily degradable organic matter thereby referring to the content of high COD and BOD that have a value of 50,000 ppm
and 25,000 ppm respectively. Chin et al. (1996) also reported that POME contains 6000 mg/L of oil and grease, 59,530
mg/L of suspended solids and 750 mg/L of nitrogen. Therefore, POME can cause water pollution (Thani et al., 1999). The
general idea on how POME can cause water pollution is that the POME discharge contained microorganism that will compete
mainly on the uptake of oxygen with the aquatic life. This incident will eventually cause the aquatic life to have less oxygen
than previous thus slowly hindered the growth of the aquatic life and in a long term will preventing their existence. The
characteristic of POME is given at Table 1. High COD and BOD content might cause the oxygen content in the water to be
reduced and this would eventually lead to the death of aquatic life.
Usually, the characteristic of POME varies considerably depending on processed batches, days and factories that are also
related to the different processing technique and the age or type of fruit (Ng et al., 1987). Different POME characterization
might be due to the uncertain discharge limit of the factory, temperature and condition of the palm oil processing (Ahmad
et al., 2005c, 2006b). Even though POME is an acidic mixture (Borja and Banks, 1994), however it does contain a compelling
amount of amino acids, short fibers, nitrogenous compound, free organic acid, carbohydrates and inorganic nutrients such
as sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, manganese, ferum, zinc, cobalt, copper and cadmium (Santosa, 2008).
The content of amino acid either essential or non-essential, fatty acid and mineral approximate composition (%) are
shown in Table 2. Lead (Pb) that are considered as lethal metal can likewise be found in POME (Habib et al., 1997) because
of pollution from plastic and metal funnels, tanks and compartments where Pb is generally utilized in paints and coating
materials. Nevertheless, their concentrations are usually below the sublethal levels (>17.5 µg/g) (James et al., 1996). POME
is thus not toxic for flora and fauna. According to Chow (1991), nitrogen is initially present in POME in the form of organic
nitrogen. As time progress, the organic nitrogen is slowly transformed to ammoniacal nitrogen with molecular of 17–
35 kg/kmol.
Table 1
Characteristic of raw POME.
Source: MPOB.
Parameter POME (average) Range
pH 4.2 3.4–5.2
Oil and grease 4000 –
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) 25,000 10,250–43,750
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 51,000 15,000–100,000
Total solid 40,000 11,500–79,000
Suspended solid 18,000 5000–54,000
Total volatile solid 34,000 9000–72,000
Ammoniacal nitrogen (NH3 -N) 35 4–80
Total nitrogen 750 180–1400
All values are in mg/L except pH
Table 2
The approximate composition of amino acid, fatty acid and mineral in raw POME.
Source: Habib et al. (1997), Ho et al. (1984) and Muhrizal et al. (2006).
Amino acids Composition (%) Fatty acid Composition (%) Mineral Composition (µg/g dry weight)
Aspartic acid 9.66 Caprylic acid 2.37 Fe 11.08
Glutamic acid 10.88 Capric acid 4.29 Zn 17.58
Serine 6.86 Lauric acid 3.22 P 143 777.38
Glycine 9.43 Myristic acid 12.66 Na 94.57
Histidine 1.43 Pentadocanoic acid 2.21 Mg 911.95
Arginine 4.25 Palmitic acid 22.45 Mn 38.81
Threonine 2.58 Heptadecanoic acid 1.39 K 8951.55
Alanine 7.7 10-Heptadecanoic acid 1.12 Ca 1650.09
Proline 4.57 Stearic acid 10.41 Co 2.40
Tyrosine 3.16 Oleic acid 14.54 Cr 5.02
Phenylalanine 3.2 Linoleic acid 9.53 Cu 10.76
Valine 3.56 Linolenic acid 4.72 Ni 1.31
Methionine 6.88 T-linolenic acid 0.00 S 13.32
Cystine 3.37 Arachidic acid 3.56 Se 12.32
Isoleucine 4.53 Ecosatrienoic acid 2.04 Si 10.50
Leucine 4.86 Eicosatetraenoic acid 1.12 Sn 2.30
Lysine 2.66 Eicosapetaenoic acid 0.36 Al 16.60
Tryptophan 1.26 B 7.60
Mo 6.45
As 9.09
V 0.12
Pb 5.15
Cd 0.44
It is possible to use the Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) for biological means because of the existence of huge compositions
and concentrations of carbohydrate, protein, nitrogenous compounds, lipids and minerals in POME (Hwang et al., 1978;
Phang, 1990; Habib et al., 1997). A report by Ho and Tan (1983) stated that there is a possibility for the presence of pentose
in POME. Furthermore, Hwang et al. (1978) have also been reporting the same findings. A pentose is found inside plant
by mean of respiration. Water-soluble carbohydrates, in terms of glucose, reducing sugars and pectin, are also found to be
present in the soluble fraction of POME (Wu et al., 2009).
4. Conventional Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) treatment technologies
By utilizing a microbial process, the high concentration of protein, nitrogenous compounds, lipid, carbohydrate and
minerals inside POME can be converted into valuable material (Habib et al., 1997; Agamuthu and Tan, 1985). Perez et al.
(2001), reported that due to the organic properties of POME, the anaerobic process is the most suitable method of treating
POME. Thus, from the earlier stage of palm oil mill industry, ponding system is being used as the conventional method to
treat POME (Khalid and Wan Mustafa, 1992; Ma and Ong, 1985). However, there are some parts of POME that need to be
given full attention to ensure that this industry will remain sustainable and environmentally friendly. The most common
method to treat POME is by using it as a fertilizer and water supply for the palm tree.
Despite the facts that POME is non-lethal, treatment of POME is the most crucial part to ensure that there is a balance
between the environment protection, economic expansion and sustainable development due to its potential to cause
pollution (Rupani et al., 2010). Apart from that, POME treatment is considered a burden rather than part of the production
process and not a source of benefit (Ma, 1999). Direct discharge of POME into the water body will cause water contamination
and resulted in aquatic endangerment (Hwang et al., 1978). Thus, researchers are experimenting with a new alternative
method to treat palm oil mill effluent. Many steps of this POME treatment were done through conventional methods such as
Table 3
Environment quality restriction on POME discharge by respective countries.
Source: DOE, Pollution Control Department (2016), Pelatihan Lingkungan (2016).
Palm oil mill effluent discharge standard
Parameter Malaysia Indonesia Thailand
pH 5.0–9.0 6.0–9.0 5.5–9.0
BOD (mg/L) 100 (20 in Sabah and Sarawak) 100 20
COD (mg/L) 50a 350 120
Total solids (mg/L) – 0 3000
Suspended solid (mg/L) 400 250 50
Oil and grease (mg/L) 50 25 5
Ammoniacal Nitrogen (mg/L) 10 – –
Total Nitrogen (mg/L) 10 50 100
Temperature (◦ C) 45 – 40
a
Requirement set by Malaysia Sewage and Industrial Effluent Discharge Standard.
an aerobic system, anaerobic system, open decomposing tank, advanced ventilation system, closed anaerobic decomposition
tank and composting of organic fertilizer.
However, these ponds acquire an extensive open area subsequently producing a foul stench and predicament in
maintaining the liquor dissemination and biogas collection which results in harmful effect to the environment (Onyia et
al., 2001; Ng et al., 1987; Chin et al., 1996). Every industry that operates the palm oil will have an open tank or pond basically
for the anaerobic process to occur and this is applied for Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand and other countries. Despite the
disadvantages of the pond system, a series of shallow pond also have been practiced to minimizes the effect of POME to the
environment. Nevertheless, this method also required much larger space and has longer hydraulic retention time (Chan and
Chooi, 1984).
Since POME is generally made up of organic substances that are biodegradable, therefore the process that is suitable to
treat POME is based on anaerobic, aerobic, and facultative process (Sethupathi, 2004). A high value of degradable organic
matter inside raw POME might be due to the presence of unrecovered palm oil inside it (Ahmad et al., 2003). Biological
treatment has massive advantages towards other method such as less energy demand, minimum sludge accumulation, no
liberation of foul odor and production of methane due to the efficient breakdown of organic substances by anaerobic bacteria
(Rincón et al., 2006). These methane gas can be used further for the generation of electricity. These conventional methods
require a large space to be done (Quah et al., 1982). Unfortunately, the anaerobic and facultative pond rely entirely on bacteria
to break down pollution. To guarantee there is a helpful domain for the microorganism to grow well, additional care must be
taken since these microorganisms are exceptionally delicate to the encompassing temperature and pH (Ahmad et al., 2003).
However, the problem faced by the open system is the liberation of methane gas freely to the atmosphere and this will
slowly cause the ozone layer to be thinner and eventually cause a greenhouse effect. Although these processes only require
a small capital and operational energy, the drawback is that these processes have a longer retention time which is in the
range of 20–60 days and a large area is needed for the process to be operational (Loh et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2010; Choi et al.,
2013; Yejian et al., 2008). The changes from open anaerobic system to the closed anaerobic system has drawn many changes
towards the regulatory standard. Furthermore, the process will not only reduce water pollution additionally biogas freed
and gathered from the closed system can be utilized as fuel for electricity generation (Chotwattanasak and Puetpaiboon,
2011) and palm oil mills could obtain carbon credits as revenue by the full utilization of methane gas as a sustainable and
environmentally friendly power vitality from the anaerobic processing of POME (Poh and Chong, 2009). In anaerobiosis
process, different sorts of reactor setup like closed-tank anaerobic digester, open digester tank, or covered lagoon have been
broadly used to treat POME (Wang et al., 2015).
A hybrid system has been used to ensure lesser processing time and higher efficiency, which combines the conventional
method with the alternative method such as up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) (Khemkhao et al., 2011), anaerobic
filter (Bello and Abdul Raman, 2017), anaerobic fluidized bed rector (AFBR) (Borja and Banks, 1995), sequencing batch reactor
(SBR) (Chan et al., 2011), expanded granular sludge blanket (EGSB) (Yejian et al., 2008), up-flow anaerobic sludge fixed-film
reactor (UASFF) (Najafpour et al., 2006) and rotating biological contactors (RBC) (Najafpour et al., 2005) have been studied.
The hybrid methods managed to reduce the hydraulic retention time on a laboratory scale.
The discharge POME from the factory must meet the standard requirement provided by the Environmental Department
accordingly to the countries itself. The transition of treatment method is mainly due to the changing restriction from the
DOE thus making the conventional method outdated and cannot fulfill the new requirement such as the BOD discharge limit
has been reviewed from 100 mg/L down to 20 mg/L for Malaysia (Tabassum et al., 2015). Table 3 shows the latest palm oil
mill discharge standard for Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand.
5. Alternative Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) treatment technologies
In the palm oil industry, 5-7 tonnes of POME is generated with the production of 1 tonne of palm oil. Almost half of the
water utilized in the production of palm oil will be POME (Ahmad et al., 2003). The POME treatment is urgently needed,
especially with the use of alternative method. This is because, biological treatment such as aerobic treatment, anaerobic and
facultative pond effluent requires a long retention time and requires a large area (Metcalf, 2003) in addition to requiring a
lot of energy for ventilation (Doble and Kumar, 2005). Biological treatment requires microorganism which is certainly very
sensitive to changes in weather and temperature. The optimum environment is also required to carry out this treatment
process. In addition, these microorganisms will also release biogas which smells like methane and hydrogen sulfide. Thus,
biological treatment techniques can derive a negative impact on the environment other than not effective in terms of time
and cost performance.
Since the conventional method nowadays become out of the league, a new method to treat POME is emerged. The
possibility of POME treatment can always be improved by using physicochemical treatment and membrane filtration (Wu et
al., 2009). Over the year, alternative methods to treat the POME such as adsorption (Said et al., 2016), coagulation/flocculation
(Bhatia et al., 2007a), advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) (Parthasarathy et al., 2016a; Saeed et al., 2016a, b) and membrane
filtration (Ahmad et al., 2005a; Mohammad et al., 2009) has been examined by researcher to carter the drawbacks from the
ponding or lagoon system for the POME treatment. Despite it is still running on a laboratory-scale, it has shown a good
potential compared to the conventional method. In addition, to support the statement that an alternative method for POME
treatment is in demand, 90% of publications about POME for the past 2 years are all about the POME alternative treatment
technology (Bello and Abdul Raman, 2017).
(a) Coagulation/flocculation treatment

Other than biological treatment, the physicochemical treatment is also being used to treat POME. The physicochemical
treatment uses a chemical such as coagulants and flocculants that mainly focuses on the separation of colloidal particles.
Diverse physicochemical treatment processes have been used to treat the POME, but this process will require a very high
amount of chemicals and there is no process could be used alone on a commercial scale. These chemicals will amend the
physical state of colloid, which allows them to remain in an indeterminately stable form thus forming a particles or flocs
(Wu et al., 2010).
Ferric chloride, aluminum chloride, aluminum sulfate (alum), polyaluminium chloride (PAC), ferrous sulfate and hydrated
lime are the most utilized coagulant nowadays in light of its perceive execution, proficiency, economy, and usability based
on the wastewater treatment (Edzwald, 1993). Alum and PAC, compared to the other chemical are being used globally
because it is cheap and can be retrieved easily (Keeley et al., 2014). The usage of coagulant and flocculant eventually will
separate the suspended solid portion from the POME thus making the POME easier to be filtered with less tendency of using
a high-pressure process and flux. Since the usage of large amount of chemicals to treat POME is costly, a natural-based
coagulant/flocculant such as chitosan and Moringa oleifera or can be known as horseradish tree have been studied for the
POME treatment application. In terms of cost and treatment performance, chitosan has shown a promising potential that it
has better performance compared to alum and PAC (Ahmad et al., 2006b).
Moreover, the chemicals are not biodegradable and will give negative effects. As one of the solutions, biodegradable and
natural chemicals is being used to replace the common one (Ang et al., 2016; Nourani et al., 2016; Bhatia et al., 2007b; Shak
and Wu, 2014). However, the usage of coagulation or either flocculation is always being used as a pre-treatment. It is because,
in a wastewater treatment, the usage of coagulation/flocculation method is capable to reduce the TSS of the wastewater thus
making it easier to be process in the next stage.
A combination of micro-bubble flotation and coagulation method has been experimented by Poh et al. (2014) for the
treatment of anaerobically treated POME. The reduction in TSS, oil and grease, COD and BOD was 57.3%, 74.5%, 53.7% and
77.0% respectively. By using PAC as the coagulant, the bubbling time was set for 12.5 min with a flowrate of 19.8 L/min. Micro-
bubble flotation was modified from dissolved air flotation (DAF) with the pore size of 100 µm and 10 µm respectively. With
a smaller bubble size, a larger surface area and longer residence time can be provided thus increasing the efficiency to oil and
suspended solid in wastewater (Parmar and Majumder, 2013). Previously, it is being reported that the combination of DAF
method with coagulation addition has the ability remove more than 90% of suspended solid (SS) and oil from wastewater
(De Nardi et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2010; Li et al., 2007).
The usage of only single coagulation process to treat the POME has been done by Shak and Wu (2015). They combined the
usage of alum and extracted natural seed gum to treat the raw POME which the results are slightly similar when using only
alum that is 81.58% for suspended solid reduction while 48.22% for COD reduction. Previously by using a natural coagulant,
Moringa oleifera for POME pretreatment process, a reduction of COD and SS up to 52% and 95% respectively has been recorded
by Bhatia et al. (2007c). On the other hand, the same range of reduction has been retrieved when applying mixture of Moringa
oleifera with chemical flocculants NALCO 7751 in which the reduction was 52.5% for COD and 99.3% for TSS.
(b) Adsorption treatment

Other than coagulation/flocculation method, an adsorption method is one of the alternative methods which is being
utilized by researchers to treat the POME. Adsorption treatment also is being considered as a physicochemical treatment.
Apart from being unique, these process has been used widely for a wastewater treatment because it is an environmental-
friendly process (Ahmed et al., 2015). Chitosan, barley waste, citrus peel, coconut shell carbon, activated carbon (AC), zeolite,
bentonite/organo-clay and fly ash are among the common adsorbents used to remove oil and grease including heavy metals
from wastewater (Shavandi et al., 2012a,c). Apart from that, there are other alternatives for adsorbents such as wood sawdust
(Sciban et al., 2007), palm kernel fiber (Ofomaja, 2010), garlic peel (Hameed and Ahmad, 2009). The usage of adsorption
technique alone has been applied for the POME treatment. Particularly, adsorption is being used for the removal of residual
oil (Ahmad et al., 2005b), suspended solids (Ahmad et al., 2005c) and heavy metals (Shavandi et al., 2012b) from POME.
A study using chitosan as adsorbent in treating POME has been conducted by Ahmad et al. (2005a). He reported that
the usage chitosan has removed 97%–99% of residual oil in POME. However, the TSS of the sample was removed prior to
oil removal treatment. While in 2014, Mohammed et al. has conducted an experiment by comparing the usage of only
adsorption process with combination of magnetic field and adsorption process to treat the treated POME. Activated carbon
was chosen as the adsorbent. The results were reduction in color, TSS and COD up to 57.11%, 61.11% and 67.87% respectively
for a single adsorption process while 79.303%, 98.455% and 98.99% respectively for a combination of magnetic field and
adsorption process.
Adsorption process will cause either physical (physisorption) or chemical interactions (chemisorption) between the
adsorbent and the adsorbate (Bello and Abdul Raman, 2017). These interaction will bind the unwanted substances to the
absorbent and later out from the system. Fu and Wang (2011) stated that, adsorption is a reversible process, in which will
offer the possibility of regeneration of adsorbent through desorption process. Shavandi et al. (2012a, c) has investigated the
usage of natural zeolite as an absorbent to remove Fe(III), Mn(II) and Zn(II) from POME. They reported that the removal of
Zn(II) and Mn(II) was more than 50% each while for Fe was about 60% from POME. The natural zeolite used was clinoptilolite
with composition of clinoptilolite (84%), cristobalite (8%), plagioclase (4%), lillit (4%) with a trace amount of quartz.
In 2015, Alkhatib et al. has studied the usage of palm kernel shell (PKS) as an adsorbent to remove the color pigment from
treated POME. Under an optimum condition, the removal was up to 89.95% and increasing as the contact time and adsorbent
dosage increased while decreasing with increasing pH. A study using montmorillonite as an adsorbent to treat palm oil mill
effluent (POME) has been conducted by Said et al. (2016). By mixing 5 g/L of adsorbent with POME under 300 rpm for 90 min,
the removal of COD, TSS and color reached more than 95% for all the listed parameter. In the work of Adeleke et al. (2017),
cow bone powder (CBP) composite was used to treat the COD and ammoniacal nitrogen inside POME; their findings showed
that the highest removal of COD and ammoniacal nitrogen was 89.6% and 75.61% respectively. AbdulRahman et al. (2016)
has reported that the CBP can be used as an alternative source of activated carbon because of its efficiency.
(c) Advance Oxidation Process (AOP) treatment

Advanced Oxidation Process (AOP) is the process for generation of strong and responsive hydroxyl radical (OH·) that
can degrade organic pollutants under 2.8 eV (Chou et al., 1999). AOP can be classified either as photochemical or non-
photochemical process which rely solely on the process such as the photochemical group that are resulted from direct
photolysis by UV light, UV/H2 O2 , UV/TiO2 , photo-Fenton and photo-Fenton-like process while non-photochemical group
resulted from ozonation and Fenton process (Carra et al., 2016). Fenton’s reagent in which is a solution of hydrogen peroxide
with ferrous iron as catalyst has been considered as a potential tool in the wastewater treatment (Saeed et al., 2015).
In 2015, Saeed et al. has conducted an experiment on the usage of central composite design (CCD) which is the Response
Surface Methodology (RSM) module to optimize the operating parameters of Fenton process to treat the treated POME
before it being release into water body. The highest result recorded was the reduction in color and COD up to 97.36% and
91.11% respectively with pH 3.5 and 30 min of reaction time. While in 2016, Saeed et al. has once again conducted the same
experiment but this time he is using high concentrated POME, which is being retrieved after the biological pre-treatment in
an open pond. COD was reduced up to 85% at an optimum condition with pH 3.5 and 90 min of reaction time.
Based on the obtained result, although this experiment is still on a laboratory scale, it has shown great potential in
which can be further utilized and extended for industrial-scale. A study by combining adsorption method with the advanced
oxidation method has been done by Parthasarathy et al. (2016b). He combined the usage of activated carbon (AC) adsorption
with ultrasonic cavitation (US cavitation) to treat POME. It was recorded that the simultaneous process of both AC adsorption
and US cavitation hybrid system has achieved 73.08% COD and 98.33% TSS removals. On the other hand, by dividing both
process and put them in order with US cavitation followed by AC adsorption has reduce the COD and TSS of the sample up
to 100% and 83.33% respectively.
Ng and Cheng (2016) has conducted an experiment on the usage of UV responsive ZnO photocatalyst to treat the POME.
It is recorded that the reduction of COD was up to 50% with 1.0 g/L ZnO loading and after 240 min of UV irradiation. Recently,
tungsten trioxide (WO3 ) starts to gain attention due to its ability to absorb either visible or UV lights with a band gap
energy in the range of 2.5–3.0 eV (Shukla et al., 2016). Thus, it has attracted the attention of Cheng et al. (2017) to study
the usage of photocatalytic method using WO3 to treat POME but focusing on COD, pH and color intensity. The recorded
result was removal of 51.15% of COD and 96.21% of decolorization while maintaining the pH at 7. On the other hand, Bashir
et al. (2017) has conducted a study on the usage electro persulphate oxidation system for the POME treatment. This system
was performed using the combination effects of electro-oxidation, electrocoagulation and electro-floatation. The result was
reduction in COD, color and TSS up to 77.70%, 97.96% and 99.72% respectively. Even though the POME used was biological
treated POME, the result has shown a promising future for the system.
(d) Membrane treatment

Membrane filtration is one of the most leading methods that is being used to treat POME. The process of separation by
membrane filtration technique is one of the effective treatment of POME. This is because the use of membrane filtration
process has several advantages which include using less energy, environmentally friendly, easy to operate and does not
require much space. Process membrane will become an important tool for improving the water quality (Nusbaum and
Fig. 4. Technique used by Ahmad et al. (2003) to treat POME.
Fig. 5. Technique used by Ahmad et al. (2006a) to reclaimed water from POME.
Fig. 6. Technique used by Shah and Singh (2003) to treat POME.
Reidinger, 1980). In addition, membrane filtration can be applied across wide range of industries; the quality of treated
water is more consistent regardless of influent variation; it can be used in a process to allow the recycling of selected waste
streams within a plant; highly skilled operators would not be required since the plant can be fully automated (Cheryan and
Rajagopalan, 1998).
Recently, membrane separation and filtration has made a remarkable emergence in the industry and concerned an
extraordinary attention due to its ability to eliminate an enormous volume of chemical and microorganism from wastewater
(Judd, 2011). The advantages of utilizing membranes in water treatment including producing reliable and high-quality water
other than simply require a basic arrangement for membrane filtration (Ahmad et al., 2005a). However, filtration through
membrane technology also does not always perfect. This is because the membrane permeation flux will decline because
of impurities. Impurities will cause clogging or fouling in the membrane pores. In addition, this phenomenon will cause a
short life expectancy of the membrane and the costs for membrane cleaning process is also quite high (Metcalf, 2003). The
membrane will be damaged due to the frequency of cleaning the fouling hardly (Maartens et al., 2002).
As a result, modification of the membrane surface to a more hydrophilic nature can be applied (Ahmad et al., 2005a).
In addition, ultrafiltration process is widely used in the refining industry due to its effectiveness. Due to the ultrafiltration
process is able to filter out suspended solids and bacteria conveniently, ultrafiltration membranes are used to filter POME.
The combination of biological treatment with ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes
in treating municipal wastewater was studied by Rautenbach et al. (1996) where 97% water recovery was achieved.
In 2003, Ahmad et al. have conducted a study on the use of membranes to treat POME. But in his study, the use of
membrane has been coupled with other techniques as a pre-treatment process such as coagulation, sedimentation, and
adsorption as the first stage. For the second stage, ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membranes used in the treatment of
POME (Fig. 4). The result obtained is a reduction in turbidity, BOD and COD were 100%, 98.8% and 99.4% of treated and water
pH is 7. Ahmad et al. (2006a) reported that the combination coagulation/flocculation treatment with membrane separation
to treat POME has successfully reclaimed 78% of drinking water from POME (Fig. 5). By using an Polyvinylidene Fluoride
(PVDF) membrane as a medium, reduction of COD, total dissolved solid, organic nitrogen and ammonia nitrogen is up to 99%
for POME treatment.
Shah and Singh (2003) has conducted a treatment of POME by using centrifugation technique as the pre-treatment process
and using hollow fiber polyethersulphone (PES) membrane as the second treatment (Fig. 6) The result obtained for COD, color
and suspended solid and turbidity is reduction by 89.9%, 92.9%, 99.4% and 97.9% respectively. The values are comparable to
research done by Ahmad et al. (2003) together with Fakhru’l-Razi and Noor (1997).
Fig. 7. Technique used by Yejian et al. (2008) to treat POME.
In a study using polysulphone ultrafiltration membrane, reduction on the reading of TSS, turbidity, TDS, and COD were
97.7%, 88.5%, 6.5% and 57.0% (Wu et al., 2007). Pre-treatment methods are often used to help optimize the operation of the
membrane. However, the main aim of this experiment is to retrieve protein and carbohydrate contain inside POME. This
study also focuses on the effect of pressure on membrane fouling. The method of combining conventional method with
alternative method always show a better result compared to the isolation of both treatments itself. These are due to the
efficiency of both processes to treat POME hence a better result obtained.
Yejian et al. (2008) have conducted a study on the integration of biological method and membrane technology in treating
POME. The biological treatment used is using anaerobic EGSB bioreactor and aerobic inner-circulation biofilm-reactor.
However, the difference in this experiment is it comprises of a series of ultrafiltration membrane and RO membrane (Fig. 7).
The average COD removal efficiency in the first stage that is biological stage is 93%. It is also reported that after the treatment
using a membrane, the suspended solid and color of the POME were undetectable.
A research by Ahmad et al. (2009) has been conducted using a membrane bioreactor to treat POME. This hybrid
process consists of an anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic reactor in series. The membrane used in this research was chlorinated
polyethylene. The same method of experiment has been done by using a mechanism which is membrane bioreactor
conducted by Xing et al. (2000) and Chang et al. (2001) that shows a promising result for POME treatment. The removal
of COD, TSS, nitrogen, phosphate that is 94%, 98%, 83% and 64% respectively has been reported. Azmi et al. (2012) has
conducted a study on the treatment of POME using a sandwich membrane. This treatment involving ‘green’ pre-treatment
prior to filtration using a membrane. The example of green treatment used is sand-filtration and chitosan-based coagulation–
flocculation. It is reported that the reduction in suspended solid, BOD and COD was 79%, 95%, and 95% respectively.
Shamsuddin et al. (2013) has conducted a study on the usage of a membrane solely to treat POME. The membrane used
is Epoxidized Natural Rubber/Polyvinyl Chloride (ENR/PVC) with cellulose and cellulose grafting polymethyl methacrylate
(Cell-g-PMMA) as a filler. The combination of ENR and PVC have the potential to produce good and does not require supports
membrane. The thermoplastic blends of ENR/PVC have been widely studied due to both of this polymer are compatible with
and the original properties of polymer can be enhanced (Margaritis and Kalfagou, 1987; Varughese et al., 1988; Ramesh and
De, 1991; Ibrahim and Dahlan, 1998; Ratnam and Zaman, 1999; Ibrahim, 2000) Cellulose has a low mass, high strengthening
effect and good thermal stability in a variety of materials that can be used in cars and buildings (Thakur et al., 2014). Based
on the studies it is reported that ENR/PVC with 20% cellulose composition as a filler and ENR/PVC with 10% cellulose grafting
polymethyl methacrylate as a filler showed the highest decolorization. This shows that the usage of membrane solely can
remove some of the organic material contained in POME.
In 2014, Azmi & Yunos has conducted an experiment by using an ultrafiltration membrane to treat POME. However, the
treatment process is being coupled with adsorption treatment as pre-treatment. The membrane used in the experiment is
flat sheet regenerated cellulose (RC) membrane. Adsorption treatment was initially applied before ultrafiltration of POME
to reduce the sludge and particles in POME. This step is being done to avoid fouling on the membrane surface. The result
reported for the pre-treatment process is a reduction in total solid, dissolve solid, suspended solid, BOD5 , COD and turbidity
up to 67.30%, 47.11%, 71.26%, 63.23%, 42.38% and 63.63% respectively. After being treated with ultrafiltration membrane, a
better quality of POME was obtained. Ultrafiltration membrane has been widely tested to use for the purpose of desalination
and water reclamation from either municipal waste or industrial waste. The comparison of the conventional method and
alternative method as general are expressed in Table 4.
6. Conclusion
Palm oil industry is an emerging industry that causes massive pollution of waste if not treated well. This industry has
caused an undisputable source of pollution. These negative impacts should be counter with wise actions and regulations.
Since the early stage of palm oil industries, there is laws and requirement that the industry needs to obey to ensure that
no significant effect will occur impromptu. However, as the palm oil industries getting expands due to the demand from
the world market, the scenario of discharging the waste into the water stream, river and drain increased. Although there
is a method such as aerobic and anaerobic treatment being used to treat these liquid waste, yet, it is still cannot meet the
standard required by the authority. These methods contain deficiency such as requiring a large area to operate and high
time retention. On the other hand, this method also releases CH4 and CO2 gas and this phenomenon will cause a greenhouse
effect.
The development of new methods as alternative ways to treat POME is always be sought. Physicochemical is one of the
alternative methods used to treat POME. Even though this method has shown a great potential, the usage of coagulant,
Table 4
Comparison of conventional and alternative method for POME treatment.
Advantages Disadvantages Reference
Aerobic High BOD expulsion efficiency and great Aeration process require high Najafpour et al. (2005), Oswal et al. (2002),
effluent quality, able to diminish pathogens energy, improper for land utilization, Leslie et al. (1999) and Doble and Kumar
from waste, hydraulic retention time is requires periodic check-up (2005).
short, practical to control toxic waste
Anaerobic Cheap, simple design, stable and reliable Required extensive land use, high Yacob et al. (2006a, b), Metcalf (2003) and
system, low operating cost, recovered sludge accumulation, hydraulic Borja et al. (1996).
sludge utilized as fertilizer, low energy retention time is high, slow start-up
requirement
Coagulation– Quickest path to reduce organic load from Sensitive to pH changes for Nik Norulaini et al. (2001), Boisvert et al.
flocculation POME, varieties of coagulant and flocculant formation of floc and performance of (1997), Ndabigengesere and Narasiah
readily available, simple and economical coagulant, sophisticated operation, (1998), Xie et al. (2011), Rattanapan et al.
usage of chemical (2011) and Aygun and Yilmaz (2010).
Adsorption Environmental friendly, low production Need a post treatment, used Ahmed et al. (2015), Hadi et al. (2015) and
expenditure, easy process, high efficiency adsorbents are hard to be disposed Pitakpoolsil and Hunsom (2013).
Advanced Oxidation AOP non-selectively react with most High operating cost, use a lot of Adeleke et al. (2017), Bello and
Process (AOP) organics, ability to degrade highly defiant chemical, excessive sludge Abdul Raman (2017), Glaze et al. (1987)
compound, easy to be applied. generation and Saeed et al. (2015)
Membrane Excellent efficiency of pollution removal, High maintenance cost, high Abdurahman et al. (2011), Fakhru’l-Razi
low labor cost, required small area pressure is required, fouling, short and Noor (1999), Ahmad et al. (2006a) and
life expectancy Metcalf (2003).
flocculant and adsorbent on a commercial scale will be huge and expensive thus making the treatment impractical and
uneconomic. For a single process, physicochemical method cannot solely treat the POME, thus by utilizing this method as
pre-treatment and coupling the method with other methods will help to increase the efficiency of the treatment.
Advance Oxidation Process is one of the alternative methods that emerge in demand of the POME treatment. With
varieties of process to be chosen either photochemical or non-photochemical, this process has shown a potential result
in treating wastewater and POME. A combination of this method with other methods will enhance the outcome results of
the treatment. On the other hand, membrane technology has concern a great attention to treat municipal waste and for
desalination purpose. Palm oil industry is no exception to the membrane in the treatment of POME. At the early stage, a
combination of conventional method with membrane filtration is being used to treat POME. Surprisingly, the result of the
treated waste is encouraging. A great deal of research has been devoted in promoting or utilizing the usage of the membrane
in either water reclamation, desalination or POME treatment purpose. Generally, all of the method discussed previously
is undoubtedly has shown a great result on a laboratory-scale. Scaling up from laboratory-scale to industrial-scale will be
challenging but substantial towards sustaining the environment and ecosystem.
References
Abdullah, N., Sulaiman, F., 2013. The Oil Palm Wastes in Malaysia.
AbdulRahman, A., Latiff, A.A.A., Daud, Z., Ridzuan, M.B., D, N.F.M., Jagaba, A., 2016. Preparation and characterization of activated cow bone powder for the
adsorption of cadmium from palm oil mill effluent. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 13, 12045.
Abdurahman, N.H., Rosli, Y.M., Azhari, N.H., 2011. Development of a membrane anaerobic system (MAS) for palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment.
Desalination 266, 208–212.
Adeleke, A.O., Latif, A.A.A., Al Gheeti, A.A., Daud, Z., 2017. Optimization of operating parameters of novel composite adsorbent for organic pollutants removal
from POME using response surface methodology. ECSN.
Adnan, H., 2013. National Palm Oil Standard Soon. The Star. Kuala Lumpur.
Afriyanti, D., Kroeze, C., Saad, A., 2016. Indonesia palm oil production without deforestation and peat conversion by 2050. Sci. Total Environ. 557–558,
562–570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.032.
Agamuthu, P., Tan, E.L., 1985. Digestion of dried palm oil mill effluent by cellulomonas species. Microbios Lett. 30, 109–113.
Ahmad, A.L., Chong, M.F., Bhatia, S., Ismail, S., 2006a. Drinking water reclamation from palm oil mill effluent (POME) using membrane technology.
Desalination 191 (1–3), 35–44.
Ahmad, A.L., Ismail, S., Bhatia, S., 2003. Water recycling from palm oil mill effluent (POME) using membrane technology. Desalination 157 (1–3), 87–95.
Ahmad, A., Ismail, S., Bhatia, S., 2005a. Ultrafiltration behavior in the treatment of agro-industry effluent: Pilot scale studied. Chem. Eng. Sci. 60 (19),
5385–5394.
Ahmad, A.L., Sumathi, S., Hameed, B.H., 2005b. Adsorption of residue oil from palm oil mill effluent using powder and flake chitosan: equilibrium and kinetic
studies. Water Res. 39, 2483–2494.
Ahmad, A.L., Sumathi, S., Hameed, B.H., 2005c. Residual oil and suspended solid removal using natural adsorbents chitosan, bentonite and activated carbon:
a comparative study. Chem. Eng. J. 108, 179–185.
Ahmad, A.L., Sumathi, S., Hameed, B.H., 2006b. Coagulation of residue oil and suspended solid in palm oil mill effluent by chitosan, alum, and PAC. Chem.
Eng. J. 118, 99–105.
Ahmad, Z., Ujang, Z., Olsson, G., Latiff, A., 2009. Evaluation of hybrid membrane bioreactor (MBR) for palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment. Int. J. Integr.
Eng. (Issue Civ. Environ. Eng.) 17–26.
Ahmed, Y., Yaakob, Z., Akhtar, P., Sopian, K., 2015. Production of biogas and performance evaluation of existing treatment processes in palm oil mill effluent
(POME). Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 42, 1260–1278.
Alkhatib, M.F., Mamun, A.A., Akbar, I., 2015. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of color removal from POME by granular
activated carbon. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12, 1295–1302.
Ang, W.L., Mohammad, A.W., Benamor, A., Hilal, N., 2016. Chitosan as natural coagulant in hybrid coagulation-nanofiltration membrane process for water
treatment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 4 (4), 4857–4862.
Aygun, A., Yilmaz, T., 2010. Improvement of coagulation-flocculation process for treatment of detergent wastewaters using coagulant aids. Int. J. Chem.
Environ. Eng. 1 (2), 97–101.
Aziz, H., Abdul, B.T., 2007. Reactive Extraction of Sugars from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch Hydrolysate Using Naphthalene-2-Boronic Acid Thesis (Master
of Science), Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Azmi, N.S., Yunos, K.F., 2014. Wastewater treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) by ultrafiltration membrane separation technique coupled with
adsorption treatment as pre-treatment. Ital.Oral Surg. 2, 257–264.
Azmi, N., Yunos, K.F.M., Zakaria, R., 2012. Application of sandwich membrane for the treatment of POME for water reuse. Procedia Eng. 44, 1980–1981.
Bashir, M.J.K., Wei, C.J., Aun, N.C., Abu Amr, S.S., 2017. Electro persulphate oxidation for polishing of biologically treated palm oil mill effluent (POME). J.
Environ. Manag. 193, 458–469.
Bello, M.M., Abdul Raman, A.A., 2017. Trend and current practices of palm oil mill effluent polishing: Application of advanced oxidation processes and their
future perspectives. J. Environ. Manag. 198, 170–182.
Bello, M.M., Nourouzi, M.M., Abdullah, L.C., Choong, T.S.Y., Koay, Y.S., Keshani, S., 2013. POME is treated for removal of color from biologically treated POME
in fixed bed column: Applying wavelet neural network (WNN). J. Hazard. Mater. 262, 106–113.
Bhatia, S., Othman, Z., Ahmad, A.L., 2007a. Pretreatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) using Moringa oleifera seeds as natural coagulant. J. Hazard. Mater.
145, 120–126.
Bhatia, S., Othman, Z., Ahmad, A.L., 2007b. Coagulation-flocculation process for POME treatment using Moringa oleifera seeds extract: optimization studies.
Chem. Eng. J. 133, 205–212.
Bhatia, S., Othman, Z., Ahmad, A.L., 2007c. Pretreatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) using Moringa oleifera seeds as natural coagulant. J. Hazard. Mater.
145 (1), 120–126.
Boisvert, J.P., To, T.C., Berrak, A., Julicocur, C., 1997. Phosphate adsorption in flocculation processes of aluminium sulphate and poly-aluminium-silicate-
sulphate. Water Res. 31, 1937–1946.
Borja, R., Banks, C.J., 1994. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent by upflow anaerobic filtration. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 61, 103–109.
Borja, R., Banks, C.J., 1995. Comparison of an anaerobic filter and an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor treating palm oil mill effluent. Process. Biochem. 30,
511–521.
Borja, R., Banks, C.J., Sánchez, E., 1996. Anaerobic treatment of palm oil mill effluent in a two-stage up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. J.
Biotechnol. 45, 125–135.
Butler, R.A., Laurance, W., 2009. Is oil palm the next emerging threat to the Amazon. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 2, 1–10.
Carlson, K.M., Curran, L.M., Asner, G.P., Pittman, A.M., Trigg, S.N., Marion Adeney, J., 2012. Carbon emissions from forest conversion by Kalimantan oil palm
plantations. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 283–287.
Carra, I., Sánchez Pérez, J.A., Malato, S., Autin, O., Jefferson, B., Jarvis, P., 2016. Performance of different advanced oxidation processes for tertiary wastewater
treatment to remove the pesticide acetamiprid. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 91 (1), 72–81.
Chan, Y.J., Chong, M.F., Law, C.L., 2011. Optimization on thermophilic aerobic treatment of anaerobically digested palm oil mill effluent (POME). Biochem.
Eng. J. 55, 193–198.
Chan, K.S., Chooi, C.F., 1984. Ponding system for palm oil mill effluent treatment. In: Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on Palm Oil Mill Technology &
Effluent Treatment, pp. 185–192.
Chang, I.S., Gander, M., Jeffreson, B., Judd, S., 2001. Low-cost membranes for use in a submerged MBR. Trans. IChemE 79, 183–188.
Chavalparit, O., Rulkens, W.H., Khaodhair, S., 2006. Options for environmental sustainability of the crude palm oil industry in thailand through enhancement
of industrial ecosystems. Environ. Dev. Sustainabil. 8 (2), 271–287.
Cheng, Y.W., Chang, Y.S., Ng, K.H., Wu, T.Y., Cheng, C.K., 2017. Photocatalytic restoration of liquid effluent from oil palm agroindustry in Malaysia using
tungsten oxides catalyst. J. Cleaner Prod. 162, 205–219.
Cheryan, M., Rajagopalan, M., 1998. Membrane processing of oily streams. Wastewater treatment and waste reduction. J. Membr. Sci. 151 (1), 13–28.
Chin, K.K., Lee, S.W., Mohammad, H.H., 1996. A study of palm oil mill effluent treatment using a pond system. Water Sci. Technol. 34, 119–123.
Choi, W.H., Shin, C.H., Son, S.M., Ghorpade, P.A., Kim, J.J., Park., J.Y., 2013. Anaerobic treatment of palm oil mill effluent using combined high-rate anaerobic
reactors. Bioresour. Technol. 141, 138–144.
Chotwattanasak, J., Puetpaiboon, U., 2011. Full-scale anaerobic digester for treating palm oil mill wastewater. J. Sustainable Energy Environ. 2, 133–136.
Chou, S., Huang, C., Huang, Y.H., 1999. Effect of Fe (II) on catalytic oxidation in a fluidized bed reactor. Chemosphere 39, 1997–2006.
Chow, M.C., 1991. Palm oil mill effluent analysis. Kuala Lumpur: Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia, pp. 11–18.
Corley, R.H.V., 2009. How much palm oil do we need? Environ. Sci. Policy 12, 134–139.
Dale, B.E., 2007. Thinking clearly about biofuels: ending the irrelevant ‘net energy’ debate and developing better performance metrics for alternative fuels.
Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin. 1, 14–17.
Dallinger, J., 2011. Oil palm development in Thailand: economic, social. Oil Palm Expansion in South East Asia: trends and implications for local communities
and indigenous peoples.
De Nardi, I.R., Fuzi, T.P., Nery, V. Del, 2008. Performance evaluation and operating strategies of dissolved-air flotation system treating poultry slaughterhouse
wastewater. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 52, 533–544.
DEDE, 2012. The renewable and alternative energy development plan for 25 percent in 10 years (2012–2021). Department of Alternative Energy
Development and Efficiency (DEDE), Ministry of Energy, Bangkok, Thailand.
Deptan, 2014. Pusat Data dan Informasi Pertanian. Center for agriculture data and information. Retrived from http://aplikasi.deptan.go.id/bdsp/index-e.asp.
DIT, 2014. Palm oil balance and consumption (2012–2014). Department of Internal Trade. Ministry of Commerce.
Doble, M., Kumar, A., 2005. Biotreatment of Industrial Effluents. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, United Kingdom, pp. 19–38.
Edzwald, J.K., 1993. Coagulation in drinking water treatment: particles, organics and coagulants. Water Sci. Technol. 27, 21–35.
Fakhru’l-Razi, A., Noor, M.J.M.M., 1997. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent with the membrane anaerobic system (MAS). In: IAWQ Proc. Specialized
Conference Chemical Process Industries and Env. Management, 8–10 Sept. Cape Town.
Fakhru’l-Razi, A., Noor, M.J.M.M., 1999. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) with the membrane anaerobic system (MAS). Water Sci. Technol. 39,
159–163.
FAO, 2007. FAOSTAT Online Statistical Service. Available from: http://faostat.fao.org (accessed October 2016). United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization (FAO), Rome.
FAOSTAT, 2016. Oil palm and palm oil production in Thailand during 2005 - 2014 [WWW Document]. Food Agric. Organ. Stat. Div.
Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., Hawthorne, P., 2008. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319, 1235–1238.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2013. FAOStat. Retrieved from http://faostat.fao.org/.
Foreign Agricultural Service, 2005. USDA, Oil Seeds Circular, Growing Industrial Use of Vegetable Oil Expected to Impact EU Oil seeds and Products Trade.
October.
Fu, F., Wang, Q., 2011. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J. Environ. Manag. 92, 407–418.
Gerbens-Leenes, P.W., Hoekstra, A.Y., van der Meer, Th., 2009. The water footprint of energy from biomass: a quantitative assessment and consequences of
an increasing share of bio-energy in energy supply. Ecol. Econom. 68, 1052–1060.
Glaze, W.H., Kang, J.W., Chapin, D.H., 1987. The chemistry of water treatment processes involving ozone, hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet radiation. Ozone
Sci. Eng. 9, 335–352.
Gunarso, P., Hartoyo, M.E., Agus, F., Killeen, T., 2013. Oil palm and land use change in Indonesia, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea. Round Table on Sustainable
Palm Oil (RSPO), Singapore.
Habib, M.A.B., Yusoff, F.M., Phang, S.M., Ang, K.J., Mohamed, S., 1997. Nutritional values of chironomid larvae grown in palm oil mill effluent and alga culture.
Aquaculture 158, 95–105.
Hadi, P., Xu, M., Ning, C., Lin, C.S.K., McKay, G., 2015. A critical review on preparation, characterization and utilization of sludge-derived activated carbons
for wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 260, 895–906.
Hameed, B.H., Ahmad, A.A., 2009. Batch adsorption of methylene blue from aqueous solution by garlic peel, an agricultural waste biomass. J. Hazard. Mater.
164, 870–875.
Hamzah, I.K., 2008. Sterilisation station- Operation. Lecture notes for Diploma in Palm Oil Milling Technology and Management. Bangi: Malaysian Palm Oil
Board.
Hansen, S.B., Padfield, R., Syayuti, K., Evers, S., Zakariah, Z., Mastura, S., 2015. Trends in global palm oil sustainability research. J. Cleaner Prod. 100, 140–149.
Ho, C.C., Tan, Y.K., 1983. Centrifugal fractionation studies on the particulates of palm oil mill effluent. Water Res. 17, 613–618.
Ho, C.C., Tan, Y.K., Wang, C.W., 1984. The distribution of chemical constituents between the soluble and the particulate fractions of palm oil mill effluent
and its significance on its utilization/treatment. Agric. Wastes 11, 61–71.
Hwang, T.K., Ong, S.M., Seow, C.C., Tan, H.K., 1978. Chemical composition of palm oil mill effluents. Planter 54, 749–756.
Ibrahim, A., 2000. Strategi penyilidikan kimia getah asli. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Ibrahim, A., Dahlan, M., 1998. Thermoplastic natural rubber blends. Prog. Polym. Sci. 23, 665–706.
IEA, 2011. Technology Roadmap: Biofuel for Transport. International Energy Agency, France.
Index Mundi. 2017. Malaysia Palm Oil Production by Year. Retrieved from http://www.indexmundi.com/agriculture/?country=my&commodity=palm-
oil&graph=production.
James, W.E., 2008. Food prices and inflation in developing Asia: Is poverty reduction coming to an end? Asian Development Bank, Philippines.
James, R., Sampath, K., Alagurathinam, S., 1996. Effect of lead on respiratory enzyme activity, glycogen and blood sugar levels of the teleost Oreochromis
mossambicus (Peters) during accumulation and depuration. Asian Fish. Sci. 9, 87–100.
Judd, S., 2011. The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors for Water and Wastewater Treatment. Elsevier Science, Great Britain.
Junaidah, M.J., Norizzah, A.R., Zaliha, O., Mohamad, S., 2015. Optimisation of sterilisation process for oil palm fresh fruit bunch at different ripeness. Int.
Food Res. J. 22 (1), 275–282.
Keeley, J., Smith, A.D., Judd, S.J., Jarvis, P., 2014. Reuse of recovered coagulants in water treatment: An investigation on the effect coagulant purity has on
treatment performance. Sep. Purif. Technol. 131, 69–78.
Khalid, R., Wan Mustafa, W.A., 1992. External benefits of environmental regulation: Resource recovery and the utilisation of effluents. The pp: 33–42.
Environmentalist 12, 277–285.
Khemkhao, M., Nuntakumjorn, B., Techkarnjanaruk, S., 2011. Effect of chitosan on UASB treating POME during a transition from mesophilic to thermophilic
conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 4674–4681.
Kittikul, A.H., Prasertsan, P., Srisuwan, K., Jitbunierdkul, S., Thonalim, V., 1994. Oil recovery from palm oil mill wastewater. In: Proceedings of a Conference
on the Oil Loss Prevention in Palm Oil Industry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, pp. 4–29.
Koh, L.P., Ghazoul, J., 2008. Biofuels, biodiversity, and people: understanding the conflicts and finding opportunities. Biol. Cons. 141, 2450–2460.
Koh, L.P., Miettinen, J., Liew, S.C., Ghazoul, J., 2011. Remotely sensed evidence of tropical peatland conversion to oil palm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108,
5127–5132.
Krause, A.L., 1994. Environmental management strategies for palm oil industry. In: Proceedings of a Conference on the Oil Loss Prevention in Palm Oil
Industry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, 94–104.
Leslie, G.Jr.C.P., Daigger, G.T., Lim, H.C., 1999. Biological Wastewater Treatment, second ed.. CRC Press, Revised & Expanded.
Li, X., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Wang, C., Zhou, X., 2007. Separation of oil from wastewater by column flotation. J. China Univ. Min. Technol. 17, 546–551.
Liew, W.L., Kassim, M.A., Muda, K., Loh, S.K., Affam, A.C., 2014. Conventional methods and emerging wastewater polishing technologies for palm oil mill
effluent treatment: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 149, 222–235.
Liu, S., Wang, Q., Ma, H., Huang, P., Li, J., Kikuchi, T., 2010. Effect of micro-bubbles on coagulation flotation process of dyeing wastewater. Sep. Purif. Technol.
71, 337–346.
Loh, S.K., Lai, M.E., Ngatimanetal, M., 2013. Zero discharge treatment technology of palm oil mill effluent. J. Oil Palm Res. 25, 273–281.
Ludin, N.A., Bakri, M.A.M., Kamauddin, N., Sopian, K., Deraman, M.S., Hamid, N.H., Asim, N., Othman, M.Y., 2014. Malaysian oil palm plantation sector:
exploiting renewable energy towards sustaianbility production. J. Cleaner Prod. 65, 9–15.
Ma, A.N., 1999. Treatment of palm oil mill effluent. In: G. Singh, K.H. Lim, T. Leng and L.K. David, (eds) Oil Palm and the Environment: A Malaysian Perspective.
Malaysian Oil Palm Growers’ Council Kuala Lumpur, pp. 113–126.
Ma, A.N., Ong, A.S.H., 1985. Pollution control in palm oil mills in Malaysia. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 62, 261–266.
Maartens, A., Jacobs, E., Steward, P., 2002. UF of pulp and paper effluent: membrane fouling prevention and cleaning. J. Membr. Sci. 209 (1), 81–92.
Margaritis, A.G., Kalfagou, N.K., 1987. Miscibility of chlorinated polymers with epoxidized poly(hydrocarbons): 1. Epoxidized natural rubber/polyvinyl
chloride blends. Polymer 28, 497–502.
Metcalf, E., 2003. Wastewater Engineering Treatment and Reuse, fourth ed.. McGraw-Hill, pp. 96–97.
Miettinen, J., Hooijer, A., Shi, C., Tollenaar, D., Vernimmen, R., Liew, S.C., Malins, C., Page, S.E., 2012. Extent of industrial plantations on Southeast Asian
peatlands in 2010 with analysis of historical expansion and future projections. GCB Bioenergy 4, 908–918.
Milder, J.C., McNeely, J.A., Shames, S.A., Scherr, S.J., 2008. Biofuels and eco agriculture: can bioenergy production enhance landscape-scale ecosystem
conservation and rural livelihoods? Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 6, 105–121.
Mohammed, R.R., Ketabchi, M.R., McKay, G., 2014. Combined magnetic field and adsorption process for treatment of biologically treated palm oil mill
effluent (POME). Chem. Eng. J. 243, 31–42.
Mohammad, A.W., Yap, P.T., Wu, T.Y., 2009. Performance of hydrophobic ultrafiltration membranes in the treatment and protein recovery from palm oil
mill effluent (POME). Desalin. Water Treat. 10, 332–338.
MPOB, 2013. Malaysian Palm Oil Statistics 2012. Malaysian Palm Oil Board, Ministry of Plantation Industries and Commodities, Malaysia.
MPOB, 2017. Number and Capacities of Palm Oil Sectors Septermber 2017. Retrieved from http://bepi.mpob.gov.my/index.php/en/statistics/sectoral-
status/179-sectoral-status-2017/803-number-a-capacities-of-palm-oil-sectors-2017.html.
Muhrizal, S., Shamshuddin, J., Fauziah, I., Husni, M.A.H., 2006. Changes in iron-poor acid sulfate soil upon submergence. Geoderma 131, 110–122.
Mukherjee, I., Sovacool, B.K., 2014. Palm oil-based biofuels and sustainability in southeast Asia: A review of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Renewable
Sustainable Energy Rev. 37, 1–12.
Najafpour, G., Yieng, H.A., Younesi, H., Zinatizadeh, A., 2005. Effect of organic loading on performance of rotating biological contactors using Palm Oil Mill
effluents. Process. Biochem. 40, 2879–2884.
Najafpour, G.D., Zinatizadeh, A.A.L., Mohamed, A.R., Isa, M.H., 2006. High-rate anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent in an upflow anaerobic sludge-
fixed film bioreactor. Process. Biochem. 41, 370–379.
Ndabigengesere, A., Narasiah, K.S., 1998. Quality of water treated by coagulation using Moringa oleifera seeds. Water Res. 32, 781–791.
Ng, K.H., Cheng, C.K., 2016. Photo-polishing of POME into CH4 -lean biogas over the UV-responsive ZnO photocatalyst. Chem. Eng. J. 300, 127–138.
Ng, W.J., Goh, A.C.C., Tay, J.H., 1987. Palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment - an assessment of coagulants used to aid liquid–solid separation. Biol. Wastes
21, 237–248.
Nik Norulaini, N.A., Ahmad Zuhairi, A., Muhamad Hakimi, I., Mohd Omar, A.K., 2001. Chemical coagulation of settleable solid-free palm oil mill effluent
(POME) for organic load reduction. J. Ind. Technol. 10, 55–72.
Nonhebel, S., 2005. Renewable energy and food supply: will there be enough land? Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 9, 191–201.
Nourani, M., Baghdadi, M., Javan, M., Bidhendi, G.N., 2016. Production of a biodegradable flocculant from cotton and evaluation of its performance in
coagulation-flocculation of kaolin clay suspension: optimization through response surface methodology (RSM). J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 4 (2), 1996–2003.
Nusbaum, I., Reidinger, A.B., 1980. Water quality improvement by reverse osmosis. In: Sanks, R.L. (Ed.), Water Treatment Plant Design. Ann Arbor Science,
Michigan, pp. 623–652.
OAE. 2014a. Agricultural Statistics of Thailand. Office of agricultural economics, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Bangkok, Thailand. Retrieved
from http://www.oae.go.th/production.html (accessed on October 2017).
OAE. 2014b. Roadmap for oil palm and palm oil productions, Thailand. Office of Agricultural Economics (OAE), Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives,
Bangkok, Thailand. Retrieved from http://www.oae.go.th/ewt_news.php?nid=18883&filename=new (accessed on October 2017).
OAE, 2016. Agricultural statistics of Thailand. Office of Agricultural Economics (OAE), Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Bangkok, Thailand. Retrieved
from http://www.oae.go.th/production.html (accessed on October 2017).
Ofomaja, A.E., 2010. Equilibrium studies of copper ion adsorption onto palm kernel fibre. J. Environ. Manag. 91, 1491–1499.
Olie, J.J., Tjeng, T.D., 1982. The Extraction of Palm Oil, p. 1-24. Kuala Lumpur: The Incorporated Society of Planters.
Omar, W., Abd Aziz, N., Tarmizi, A., Harun, M.H., Kushairi, A., 2010. Mapping of Oil Palm Cultivation on Peatland in Malaysia (No 529). MPOB Information
Series, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Onwueme, I.C., Sinha, T.D., 1991. Field crop production in tropical Africa. CTA (The Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Co-operation), Ede, The
Netherlands, pp. 1–480.
Onyia, C.O., Uyub, A.M., Akunna, J.C., Norulaini, N.A., Omar, A.K.M., 2001. Increasing the fertilizer value off palm oil mill sludge: bioaugmentation in
nitrification. Sludge Management Entering the Third Millenium-Industrial, Combined, Water and Wastewater Residue. Vol. 44, pp. 157-162.
Oosterveer, P., 2015. Promoting sustainable palm oil: viewed from a global networks and flows perspective. J. Cleaner Prod. 107, 146–153.
Oswal, N., Sarma, P.M., Zinjarde, S.S., 2002. Pant A. Palm oil mill effluent treatment by a tropical marine yeast. Bioresour. Technol. 85, 35–37.
Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia (PORIM). 1987. Sterilisation. In: Maycock, J.H. (Eds). Palm Oil Factory Process Handbook Part 1, Kuala Lumpur: Palm
Oil Research Institute of Malaysia, pp. 17–29.
Parmar, R., Majumder, S.K., 2013. Micro-bubble generation and micro-bubble-aided transport process intensification –a state-of-the-art report. Chem. Eng.
Process. 64, 79–97.
Parthasarathy, S., Gomes, R.L., Manickam, S., 2016a. Process intensification of anaerobically digested palm oil mill effluent (AAD-POME) treatment using
combined chitosan coagulation, hydrogen peroxide (H2 O2 ) and Fenton’s oxidation. Clean. Technol. Environ. Policy 18, 219–230.
Parthasarathy, S., Mohammed, R.R., Fong, C.M., Gomes, R.L., Manickam, S., 2016b. A novel hybrid approach of activated carbon and ultrasound cavitation
for the intensification of palm oil mill effluent (POME) polishing. J. Cleaner Prod. 112, 1218–1226.
Pelatihan Lingkungan. 2016. Baku Mutu Air Limbah Bagi Usaha dan/ atau Kegiatan Industri Minyak Sawit. Retrieved from www.pelatihanlingkungan.com.
Perez, M., Romero, L.I., Sales, D., 2001. Organic matter degradation kinetics in an anaerobic thermophilic fluidized bed bioreactor. Anaerob 7, 25–35.
Phang, S.M., 1990. Algal production from agro-industrial and agricultural waste in Malaysia. Ambio 19, 415–418.
Pitakpoolsil, W., Hunsom, M., 2013. Adsorption of pollutants from biodiesel wastewater using chitosan flakes. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 44 (6), 963–971.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2013.02.009.
Pleanjai, S., Garivait, S., Gheewala, S.H., 2004. Environmental evaluation of biodiesel production from palm oil in a life cycle perspective. In: The Joint
International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environment, SEE, pp. 1–3.
Poh, P.E., Chong, M.F., 2009. Development of anaerobic digestion methods for palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 1–9.
Poh, P.E., Ong, W.Y.J., Lau, E.V., Chong, M.N., 2014. Investigation on micro-bubble flotation and coagulation for the treatment of anaerobically treated palm
oil mill effluent (POME). J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2 (2), 1174–1181.
Pollution Control Department. 2016. Retrieved from www.pcd.go.th.
PPKS. 2014. Bagaimana cara meningkatkan produktifitas kelapa sawit* How to improve productivity of oil palm*.
Prasertsan, S., Prasertsan, P., 1996. Biomass residues from palm oil mills in Thailand: an overview on quantity and potential usage. Biomass Bioenergy 11 (5),
87–395.
Preecharjarn, S., Prasertsri, P., 2012. Thailand biofuels annual. In: USDA, editor. GAIN Report. Bangkok.
Prueksakorn, K., Gheewala, S.H., 2008. Full chain energy analysis of biodiesel from Jatropha curcas L. in Thailand. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 3388–3393.
Quah, S.K., Lim, K.H., Gillies, D., Wood, B.J., Kanagaratnam, J., 1982. Proc. Regional Workshop on Palm Oil Mill Technology and Effluent Treatment, PORIM,
Kuala Lumpur, pp. 193–200.
Ramesh, P., De, S.K., 1991. Self-cross linkable plastic-rubber blend system based on poly(vinyl chloride)and epoxidized natural rubber. J. Mater. Sci. 26,
2846–2850.
Ratnam, C.T., Zaman, K., 1999. Stabilization of poly(vinyl chloride)/epoxidized natural rubber (ENR/PVC) blends. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 65, 481–490.
Rattanapan, C., Sawain, A., Suksaroj, T., Suksaroj, C., 2011. Enhanced efficiency of dissolved air flotation for biodiesel wastewater treatment by acidification
and coagulation processes. Desalination 280 (1–3), 370–377.
Rautenbach, R., Vossenkaul, K., Linn, T., Katz, T., 1996. Waste water treatment by membrane processes—New development in ultrafiltration, nanofiltration
and reverse osmosis. Desalination 108, 247–253.
Rincón, B., Raposo, F., Domínguez, J.R., Millán, F., Jiménez, A.M., Martín, A., Borja, R., 2006. Kinetic models of an anaerobic bioreactor for restoring wastewater
generated by industrial chickpea protein production. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradat. 57, 114–120.
Rupani, P.F., Singh, R.P., Ibrahim, M.H., Esa, N., 2010. Review of current palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment methods: vermicomposting as a sustainable
practice. World Appl. Sci. J. 11 (1), 70–81.
Saeed, M.O., Azizli, K., Isa, M.H., Bashir, M.J.K., 2015. Application of CCD in RSM to obtain optimize treatment of POME using Fenton oxidation process. J.
Water Process Eng. 8, 7–16.
Saeed, M.O., Azizli, K.A.M., Isa, M.H., Ezechi, E.H., 2016a. Treatment of POME using Fenton oxidation process: removal efficiency, optimization, and acidity
condition. Desalin. Water Treat. 3994, 1–10.
Saeed, M.O., Azizli, K.A.M., Isa, M.H., Ezechi, E.H., 2016b. Treatment of POME using Fenton oxidation process: removal efficiency, optimization, and acidity
condition. Desalin. Water Treat. 57 (50), 23750–23759.
Said, M., Hasan, H.A., Tusirin, M., Nor, M., 2016. Removal of COD, TSS and colour from palm oil mill effluent (POME) using montmorillonite. Desalin. Water
Treat. 3994, 1–8.
Santosa, S.J., 2008. Palm oil boom in Indonesia: from plantation to downstream products and biodiesel. Clean-Soil Air Water 36, 453–465.
Saswattecha, K., Cuevas Romero, M., Hein, L., Jawjit, W., Kroeze, C., 2015a. Non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions from palm oil production in Thailand. J.
Integr. Environ. Sci. 12 (sup1), 67–85.
Saswattecha, K., Kroeze, C., Jawjit, W., Hein, L., 2015b. Assessing the environmental impact of palm oil production in Thailand. J. Cleaner Prod. 100, 150–169.
Sciban, M., Radetic, B., Kevresan, Z., Klasnja, M., 2007. Adsorption of heavy metals from electroplating wastewater by wood sawdust. Bioresour. Technol.
98, 402–409.
Sethupathi, S., 2004. Removal of Residue Oil from Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) using Chitosan. Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Shah, R.S.S.R.E., Singh, P.K.a/p K., 2003. Treatment of Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) using membrane technology 2002(Mpopc), pp. 1–9.
Shak, K.P.Y., Wu, T.Y., 2014. Coagulation-flocculation treatment of high-strength agro-industrial wastewater using natural Cassia obtusifolia seed gum:
treatment efficiencies and flocs characterization. Chem. Eng. J. 256, 293–305.
Shak, K.P.Y., Wu, T.Y., 2015. Optimized use of alum together with unmodified Cassia obtusifolia seed gum as a coagulant aid in treatment of palm oil mill
effluent under natural pH of wastewater. Ind. Crops Prod. 76, 1169–1178.
Shamsuddin, M.R., Abdullah, I., Othaman, R., 2013. Celluloses filled ENR/PVC membranes for palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment. AIP Conf. Proc.
1571 (2013), 897–903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4858768.
Shavandi, M.A., Haddadian, Z., Ismail, M.H.S., Abdullah, N., 2012a. Continuous metal and residual oil removal from palm oil mill effluent using natural
zeolite-packed column. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 43, 934–941.
Shavandi, M.A., Haddadian, Z., Ismail, M.H.S., Abdullah, N., Abidin, Z.Z., 2012b. Removal of Fe(III), Mn(II) and Zn(II) from palm oil mill effluent (POME) by
natural zeolite. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 43, 750–759.
Shavandi, M.A., Haddadian, Z., Ismail, M.H.S., Abdullah, N., Abidin, Z.Z., 2012c. Removal of Fe(III), Mn(II) and Zn(II) from palm oil mill effluent (POME) by
natural zeolite. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 43 (5), 750–759.
Sheil, D., Casson, A., Meijaard, E., Noordwijk, Mv., Gaskell, J., Sunderland-Groves, J., 2009. The impacts and opportunities of oil palm in Southeast Asia: What
do we know and what do we need to know? In: CIFOR, editor. Bogor.
Shukla, S., Chaudhary, S., Umar, A., Chaudhary, G.R., Kansal, S.K., Mehta, S.K., 2016. Surfactant functionalized tungsten oxide nanoparticles with enhanced
photocatalytic activity. Chem. Eng. J. 288, 423–431.
Silalertruksa, T., Gheewala, S.H., Pongpat, P., Kaenchan, P., Permpool, N., Lecksiwilai, N., Mungkung, R., 2016. Environmental sustainability of oil palm
cultivation in different regions of Thailand: Greenhouse gases and water use impact. J. Cleaner Prod.. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.069.
Singh, R.P., Ibrahim, M.H., Esa, N., Illiyana, M.S., 2010. Composting of waste from palm oil mill: a sustainable waste management practice. Rev. Environ. Sci.
Biotechnol. 9 (4), 331–344.
SSI Review. 2014. The State of Sustainability Initiatives Review 2014: Standards and the Green Economy. Retrieved from http://www.iisd.org/library/state-
sustainability-initiatives-review-2014-standards-and-green-economy.
Stork, , 1960. Introduction. Palm Oil Rev. 1 (2), 1–8. Amsterdam: Stork & Co’s Apparatenfabriek N.V.
Sundram, K., Sambanthamurthi, R., Tan, Y.A., 2003. Palm fruit chemistry and nutrition. Asia-Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 12, 355–362.
Tabassum, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., 2015. An integrated method for palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment for achieving zero liquid discharge - a pilot study.
J. Cleaner Prod. 95, 148–155.
Tan, K.T., Lee, K.T., Mohamed, A.R., Bhatia, S., 2009. Palm oil: addressing issues and towards sustainable development. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev.
13, 420–427.
Teoh Cheng Hai. 2000. Land Use and the Oil Palm Industry in Malaysia, A bridged report produced for the WWF Forest Information System Database under
project MY 0057–Policy Assessment of Malaysia Conservation Issues, Kinabatangan, November.
Thakur, V.K., Thakur, M.K., Gupta, R.K., 2014. Review: Raw natural fiber-based polymer composites. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 19, 256–271.
Thani, M.I., Hussin, R., Ibrahim, W.W.R., Sulaiman, M.S., 1999. Industrial processes & the environment: crude palm oil industry, Handbook No. 3. Department
of Environment, Kuala Lumpur, pp. 7–54.
Tong, S.L., 2011. Recent developments on palm oil mill residues biogas recovery and utilization. In: International Conference and Exhibition of Palm Oil
Jakarta.
USDA, 2017. Indonesia palm oil exports by year. Retrieved from http://www.indexmundi.com/agriculture/?commodity=palm-oil{&}graph=exports (ac-
cesed on October 2017).
Varughese, K.T., Nando, G.B., De, P.P., De, S.K., 1988. Miscirable blends from poly(vinyl chloride) and epoxidized natural rubber: Part 1: Phase morphology.
J. Mater. Sci. 23, 3892–3902.
Wang, J., Mahmood, Q., Qiu, J., Li, Y., Chang, Y., Li, X., 2015. Anaerobic treatment of palm oil mill effluent in pilot-scale anaerobic EGSB reactor. BioMed. Res.
Int..
Whiting, D.A.M., 1990. Sterilisation station design/ operation. Report of Workshop on Palm Oil Mill Processing Technologies, Kuala Lumpur: Palm Oil
Research Institute of Malaysia.
Wu, T.Y., Mohammad, A.W., Jahim, J., Anuar, N., 2007. Palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment and bioresources recovery using ultrafiltration membrane:
effect of pressure on membrane fouling. Biochem. Eng. J. 35 (3), 309–317.
Wu, T.Y., Mohammad, A.W., Jahim, J.M., Anuar, N., 2009. A holistic approach to managing palm oil mill effluent (POME): Biotechnological advances in the
sustainable reuse of POME. Biotechnol. Adv. 27, 40–52.
Wu, T.Y., Mohammad, A.W., Jahim, J.M., Anuar, N., 2010. Pollution control technologies for the treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) through end-of-
pipe processes. J. Environ. Manag. 91 (7), 1467–1490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.008.
Xie, Q., Taweepreda, W., Musikavong, C., Suksaroj, C., 2011. Separation of oily sludge and glycerol from biodiesel processing waste by coagulation.
Songklanakarin. J. Sci. Technol. 33 (6), 699–703.
Xing, C.H., Tardieu, E., Qian, Y., Wen, X.H., 2000. Ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor for urban wastewater reclamation. J. Membr. Sci. 177, 73–82.
Yacob, S., Hassan, M.A., Shirai, Y., Wakisaka, M., Subash, S., 2006a. Baseline study of methane emission from anaerobic ponds of palm oil mill effluent
treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 366, 187–196.
Yacob, S., Shirai, Y., Hassan, M.A., Wakisaka, M., Subash, S., 2006b. Start-up operation of semi commercial closed anaerobic digester for palm oil mill effluent
treatment. Process Biochem. 41, 962–964.
Yejian, Z., Li, Y.A.N., Xiangli, Q., Lina, C.H.I., Xiangjun, N.I.U., Zhijian, M.E.I., Zhenjia, Z., 2008. Integration of biological method and membrane technology in
treating palm oil mill effluent, Vol. 20, pp. 558–564.
View publication stats

Eti 2017 Palmoilindustryin South East Asiaandtheeffluenttreatmenttechnology Areview

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Eti 2017 Palmoilindustryin South East Asiaandtheeffluenttreatmenttechnology Areview

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

Article in Environmental Technology & Innovation · December 2017

Muhammad Johan Iskandar Zahari Azizah Baharum

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Farah Hannan Anuar Rizafizah Othaman

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Edible Films View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Environmental Technology & Innovation

Palm oil industry in South East Asia and the effluent

Fig. 1. World palm oil production in 2017 (Index Mundi, 2017).

2. Oil processing and waste

2.1. Oil processing

2.1.1. FFB reception and transfer

Fig. 3. Flow chart for typical palm oil extraction process.

2.1.2. FFB sterilization

2.1.3. Threshing, digesting and screw-pressing

2.1.5. Clarification of crude palm oil (CPO)

2.1.6. Kernel separation and drying

3. Characteristic of Palm Oil Mill Effluent

4. Conventional Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) treatment technologies

5. Alternative Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) treatment technologies

(a) Coagulation/flocculation treatment

(b) Adsorption treatment

(c) Advance Oxidation Process (AOP) treatment

(d) Membrane treatment

Fig. 4. Technique used by Ahmad et al. (2003) to treat POME.

Fig. 6. Technique used by Shah and Singh (2003) to treat POME.

Fig. 7. Technique used by Yejian et al. (2008) to treat POME.

View publication stats

You might also like