Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4.1 Introduction1
Islamic microfinance has received increasing recognition in recent years as
the number of institutions providing Shari’ah compliant microfinance has
grown. Some Islamic microfinance institutions (IMFIs) have gained
greater visibility and attracted the interest of practitioners, investors and
academics. It was not surprising, therefore, that the programme of the
fifth European Research Conference on Microfinance included a plenary
session on the topic.2 It gathered highly experienced and prominent fig-
ures within the sector, including Professor Malcolm Harper from Cranfield
Management School, Professor Habib Ahmed from the University of
Durham and Dr Mohammed Kroessin from Islamic Relief Worldwide.
J. Silva Afonso (*)
Portsmouth Business School, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
e-mail: joana.afonso@port.ac.uk
A. A. Khan
CARE International, London, UK
e-mail: Khan@careinternational.org
and profits and losses are shared in accordance with each partners’ equity
participation. Partnership finance, which relies heavily on trust and confi-
dence, is largely absent from Islamic microfinance because most IMFIs
lack the time and capacity for robust monitoring and evaluation of clients’
activities, and in any case the small scale of such activities is likely to make
transactions uneconomic. At the same time, most micro-entrepreneurs
are, for a variety of reasons, unable to keep accurate accounts. As a result,
it is difficult to calculate the exact level of profits or losses.
Murabaha is the most widely used instrument in Islamic microfinance,
largely because it is relatively straightforward to structure, understand
and implement for all parties. In a murabaha contract, an IMFI will pur-
chase and deliver an asset or other items requested by the micro-
entrepreneur. It adds a ‘mark-up’ or profit margin to the sale price and the
micro-entrepreneur pays instalments to the IMFI over an agreed period
of time for this service. There is some scepticism towards this particular
method of financing, as the fixed mark-up appears similar to interest.
However, the mark-up is not compensation for time, rather it relates to
the efforts and expense of the IMFI in seeking out, negotiating, purchas-
ing and delivering the asset requested, at the best possible price.
Ijarah is similar to leasing and involves an IMFI purchasing an asset
that it then rents out at a price that enables it to recover its investment plus
a profit. More often than not, the micro-entrepreneur makes regular pay-
ments and becomes the owner of the asset once all instalments have been
made. Bai salam is a contract whereby the full price for an asset or com-
modity is agreed and paid up front in cash by the IMFI at the time the
agreement is made. The item is delivered at a specific time in the future.
The essential purpose is to ease cash liquidity shortages, most commonly
for smallholder farmers, by enabling them to receive advance payment.
Qard hasan is a cash loan that is repaid without interest, mark-up or
share in the venture for which the loan is used. Qard hasan has a particular
resonance for Muslims, as such loans are encouraged by Islamic teachings
as an effective way of helping poor people. Indeed, they are preferred to
the provision of outright charity. Qard hasan is considered a ‘benevolent
loan’ and this is generally interpreted to mean that a borrower cannot be
forced to make a repayment—in the event that a borrower is unable to
repay, the lender must accept the transaction as a charitable act. Sometimes
66 J. Silva Afonso and A. A. Khan
poor’, mostly to help establish and develop their businesses. The organ-
isation views interest as a barrier to ‘widespread proliferation of capital,
and a violation of all moral and ethical codes’. It believes that ‘burdening
the poor with exorbitant interest rates’ undermines efforts towards pov-
erty alleviation. Secondly, it holds its meeting and loan disbursements
in local religious places—mostly mosques, but sometimes temples and
churches. The organisation believes that using the existing indigenous
infrastructure for operations allows it to minimise costs and also promote
greater transparency and accountability, as well as create a sense of good-
will amongst the local community. Thirdly, it encourages clients to
become donors through the ‘Member Donor Program’. It decided to
instigate this initiative when clients asked how they could contribute to
the organisation’s development. The donations are entirely voluntary
and, it is hoped, helps instil the value of helping others in need. Fourthly,
it promotes a spirit of volunteerism. It considers that there should be a
social contract between the privileged and the underprivileged, a sense of
duty between those who have resources towards those who do not. AIM
trains and employs volunteers on a regular basis. Finally, it is a
non-discriminatory organisation and works with all, regardless of ‘their
caste, colour, creed, gender, politics or faith’.
In its first decade of operations, the institution gradually increased its
scale and outreach, as many other IMFIs have done (Khan, Ishaq, Afonso,
& Akram, 2017). However, AIM has expanded operations markedly dur-
ing the past five years (Table 4.1). Impressive recent growth is partially a
result of increasing financial support from regional governments in Pakistan
that have sought to promote financial inclusion and entrepreneurship
During the conference session, the AIM manager put forward three main
reasons to explain adopting benevolent interest-free loans as their micro-
credit model. Dr Amjad Saqib stated that the two main motivations
behind the creation of Akhuwat were the implementation of a Shari’ah-
compliant microcredit methodology; and the rectification of a feature of
most conventional microfinance programmes that was deemed unfair—
namely charging higher interest rates to poorer clients compared to rela-
tively better-off borrowers. Professor Malcolm Harper added a third
reason, arguing that other Islamic financial instruments, including the
partnership and sales contracts described in Sect. 4.2, are not suited to
the financial needs of relatively poorer people who often require cash for
working capital or for making a series of relatively small purchases.
It is important to stress here the ambiguity associated with the con-
cepts of poverty and poor, which are often interpreted differently by
microfinance actors. Robinson (2001) talks about the economically
active poor, and this was an expression employed by Dr Amjad Saqib in
his intervention. Qard hasan loans are offered to low-income entrepre-
neurs, but engagement in a self-employed activity is a pre-requisite to
access the loan. Thus, it should be expected that, like most other produc-
tive credit programmes, AIM’s microcredit programme does not reach
some of the poorest segments of the population.
AIM’s microcredit model is based on the traditional group lending
methodology. Borrowers form solidarity groups of three to six members
living in the same neighbourhood and undertaking their own independent
businesses. The applications of all the members of the group are assessed
simultaneously, although the applications regard individual loans (Khan,
Ishaq, Afonso, & Akram, 2017). The microcredit product is called a Family
Enterprise Loan, which discloses one of its distinctive features—the process
expects the involvement of the household by supporting both the loan
application and the business. In practice, this translates into the inclusion
of another member of the household (often the spouse) as co-signatory of
the loan contract (Khan, Ishaq, Afonso, & Akram, 2017).
AIM demands that loan candidates should not have any other active
loans at the point of application. Once they finish repaying their first
microcredit loan, they may apply for a second larger loan. The initial
70 J. Silva Afonso and A. A. Khan
4.4 A
Working Hypothesis and Four Essential
Questions on Qard Hasan and Islamic
Microfinance
The main argument raised throughout the conference session referred to
the ethical nature of qard hasan loans, and their potential role in fulfilling
the social mission of microfinance institutions. This vision of the model
4 Islamic Microfinance: Exploring the Experience of Akhuwat… 71
4.4.1 Demand
4.4.2 Sustainability
Khan, Ishaq, Afonso, & Akram (2017) offer insight into the funding
of AIM’s microcredit programme. In the fiscal year ending in June 2016,
the main funding sources of the institution were national and interna-
tional donations (including sadaqah or zakat), institutional funding from
regional governments (in particular the Government of Punjab) and
application fees (AIM charges a fixed and non-refundable fee of 200
Pakistani Rupees (just under US$2) for all loans). Some two years later,
the composition of the funding sources had not changed significantly.8
Although three additional international funders now support AIM
(British Asian Trust, United Nations Development Program and Louis
Berger), the amounts granted are relatively small and less than the main
international funder, Lendwithcare, which provided approximately
US$750,000 in 2017.
In addition to these funds, during 2015–2016 Akhuwat generated more
income from voluntary donations from its own active clients than from the
application fees charged during the same period (US$1.45 m compared to
US$1.13 m). In this year, as in the previous one, the income raised, even
not including the borrowers’ contributions, exceeded the total operational
expenses (cost coverage ratios of 109% and 131%). This was achieved due
to increased income and a strategy of low costs. Besides the maintenance of
a simple and low-cost logistical infrastructure (in terms of physical space
and equipment), average salaries for comparable positions are lower than
those in other microfinance institutions. They are, however, compensated
by career development opportunities, since AIM has a policy of promoting
from within; and the ‘faith’ factor, with many staff being committed
Muslims who value working for the organisation as it acts on Islamic teach-
ings of helping the poor while simultaneously not engaging in interest-
based transactions. Both factors seem to be key to achieving low rates of
staff turnover. The authors, thus, conclude that the provision of qard hasan
loans can be compatible with achieving sustainability.
Voluntary donations from clients are a distinctive feature of AIM’s
microcredit model, which Dr Amjad Saqib highlights. These donations
are encouraged by AIM from the beginning of the relationship with the
client. AIM believes that if an individual is able to take a loan without
interest, which it is hoped will help to improve his/her economic situa-
tion, when this person manages to get out of poverty at some future time,
74 J. Silva Afonso and A. A. Khan
he/she will have the moral obligation to assist others to do the same,
although there is no formal obligation to do so. Dr Amjad Saqib referred
to this as ‘Akhuwat’s social contract with its clients’ and more widely a
‘pact between the privileged and the underprivileged, a duty of those who
have resources towards those who do not’. From this perspective, AIM
should be seen not only as a microcredit programme, but also as a part-
nership with the community, in which the principles of solidarity and
sharing are central. AIM managers believe that if clients understand these
principles, they are inspired to contribute, even if their monetary contri-
tion is relatively small. Interestingly, in order to convey the message that
such donations are not a charge for its service but to promote solidarity
with other ‘deserving’ people, AIM has decided not to use the voluntary
donations from clients to cover operational costs, but rather as extra
loan capital.
4.4.3 Replicability
the concept of qard hasan loans has a particular resonance for Muslims,10
whether they are private individuals or representing institutional donors,
such as the various provincial governments in Pakistan. Considering interest-
free loans as a purely ethical, rather than a faith-based, practice opens the
door to a more positive and open view on the possibilities of replicating the
model in other, particularly non-Muslim, contexts. However, there is doubt
as to whether the interest-free model would be able to attract the same level
of financial or moral support in a non-Muslim environment.
Khan, Ishaq, Afonso, and Akram (2017) briefly mention the imple-
mentation in Pakistan of 16 independent local replications of the AIM
model. However, these institutions have struggled to attract donations
and increase their scale and outreach. In fact, there are few successful
examples of IMFIs that rely exclusively on qard hasan. Analysing the
experience of START, a microfinance institution created in 2002 in
Kosovo by Islamic Relief, Khan and Zeqiri (2017) observe how, unable to
attract donations in an environment where Islamic religious practice is
not strong, the organisation gradually moved away from solely using qard
hasan to mostly employing murabaha (with relatively higher charges for
clients), reserving qard hasan only for the poorest clients. It is clear that
Akhuwat’s success is only partly due to the qard hasan model striking a
chord with donors and clients. Equally, if not of more importance, there
has been the personal charisma and leadership qualities of Dr Amjad
Saqib, and the ability to recruit very able staff and instigate strong opera-
tional policies and procedures. During the session, Dr Amjad Saqib
referred to AIM’s plans to implement replications of the model in other
(non-Muslim majority) countries during 2018 and beyond.
4.4.4 Impact
important in the assessment of the AIM model and should also be taken in
consideration when analysing the existing, and at this stage, not very suc-
cessful replications of the model within Pakistan as well as the potential
future replications of the qard hasan model in other contexts.
4.5 Conclusion
The preceding discussion points towards an under-served demand for
Shari’ah-compliant finance in Pakistan. In the context of relatively high
rates of financial exclusion, we can assume that this demand will likely be
shared by other countries with significant Muslim populations. AIM’s
experience also demonstrates that there is a strong desire among Muslim
donors to support qard hasan programmes as a preferred means of help-
ing low-income borrowers. This willingness is based, in part, on Islamic
teachings and extends to borrowers themselves who support the organisa-
tion’s philosophy of solidarity with ‘others in need’ and make voluntary
donations to support the programme. Although it does not adhere to the
same evaluation criteria as employed in conventional interest-based
microfinance, the Akhuwat qard hasan model has been ‘financially sus-
tainable’ so far. How likely is it that this model can be replicated elsewhere?
The discussion during the conference and in this chapter shows that
AIM’s experience appears to be unique, particularly regarding the capac-
ity of the institution to attract donations. Microcredit models based on
qard hasan have either struggled to increase scale and outreach, as has
been the case with the many local replications in Pakistan, or have shifted
their emphasis from providing benevolent loans to a greater focus on
other Islamic microfinance products that generate greater income for the
institution, as was the case with START in Kosovo.
While acknowledging AIM’s innovative approach to cover its operat-
ing costs, it is also important to take into consideration the various strate-
gies adopted by the institution to maintain low operational costs and
high loan repayment rates, and promote a strong sense of commitment
and loyalty from its staff. Some of these strategies, such as the use of
mosques and references to Islamic teachings, incorporate a faith element.
However, others, such as careful client selection and rigorous loan
80 J. Silva Afonso and A. A. Khan
Notes
1. The authors acknowledge the speakers at the conference plenary for their
contributions to the discussion, Muhammad Shakeel Ishaq and Shahzad
Akram from Akhuwat Islamic Microfinance, for providing information
on the organisation’s operations, and Elise Aston for her comments
and suggestions.
2. The fifth European Research Conference on Microfinance took place in
Portsmouth, UK, from 12 to 14 June 2017. The conference was hosted
by the University of Portsmouth, who co-organised the event with the
4 Islamic Microfinance: Exploring the Experience of Akhuwat… 81
12. The Poverty Probability Index (PPI) is a poverty assessment tool initially
developed by Mark Schreiner for the Grameen Foundation, and cur-
rently managed by the Innovation for Poverty Action (IPA). PPI is based
on a country-specific questionnaire with 10 multiple-choice questions
on household characteristics and assets ownership. More information
available at https://www.povertyindex.org/
13. The analysis was based on the application of quantile regression methods
to assess the impact of different factors, including the access to the
microcredit loan, in the variation of the PPI scores. The access to the
microcredit loan was statistically significant (at 1% significance level) for
the group of respondents in quartile 3, meaning those who have experi-
enced stronger improvements in the PPI scores.
References
Afonso, J. S. (2018). Lendwithcare Assessment Project: Akhuwat Islamic
Microfinance Report. Project Report. Portsmouth: University of Portsmouth.
Asim, S. (2009). Evaluating the Impact of Microcredit on Women’s Empowerment
in Pakistan (CREB Working Paper 03-09). Lahore: CREB, Lahore School of
Economics.
Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2007). Finance, Inequality and the
Poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 12, 27–49.
El-Zoghbi, M., Karlan, D., Osman, A., & Shammout, N. (2016). Understanding
Demand for Sharia-Compliant Loans: Results from a Randomised Experiment in
Jordan. Washington, DC: CGAP.
Haider, M. (2017). MicroWatch (Issue 45). Islamabad: Pakistan Microfinance
Network.
Harper, M. (2017). What Do the Cases Tell Us? In M. Harper & A. A. Khan
(Eds.), Islamic Microfinance: Shari’ah Compliant and Sustainable?
(pp. 185–201). Rugby, UK: Practical Action Publishing.
Harper, M., & Khan, A. A. (2017). Islamic Microfinance: Shari’ah Compliant
and Sustainable? Rugby, UK: Practical Action Publishing.
Javoy, E., & Rozas, D. (2015). MIMOSA 2.0: Mapping the (Micro)Credit Cycle.
Retrieved from MIMOSA Project: http://mimosaindex.org/wp-content/
uploads/2015/11/MIMOSA-White-Paper.pdf
4 Islamic Microfinance: Exploring the Experience of Akhuwat… 83