You are on page 1of 1

KRUSKAL-WALLIS TEST group n, ti is the average observed rank sums for the

group, tj is the observed rank for an observation for the


corresponding group, and Ti is the observed total average
The Kruskal-Wallis (Kruskal & Wallis, 1952) is a non- rank sums.
parametric statistical test that assesses the differences Suppose we are interested in assessing whether the
among three or more independently sampled groups on crime rankings from a random sample of 15 U.S. cities
a single, non-normally distributed continuous variable. from the Northeast, West, and South differ. The original
Non-normally distributed data (e.g., ordinal or rank data) data are as follows: Northeast (U.S. rankings: 2, 5, 89, 203,
are suitable for the Kruskal-Wallis test. In contrast, 241), West (U.S. rankings: 1, 34, 50, 55, 292), and South
the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), which is a (U.S. rankings: 6, 12, 19, 22, 356). The procedure reranks
parametric test, may be used for a normally distributed the rank data and leaves us with new relative rankings
continuous variable. The Kruskal-Wallis test is an exten- among these 15 cities: Northeast (2, 3, 11, 12, 13), West
sion of the two-group Mann-Whitney U (Wilcoxon rank) (1, 8, 9, 10, 14), and South (4, 5, 6, 7, 15). The H statistic
test. Thus, the Kruskal-Wallis is a more generalized form for the data above is nonsignificant (H(2) = 0.14, p = .93),
of the Mann-Whitney U test and is the nonparametric and we accordingly fail to reject the null and conclude that
version of the one-way ANOVA. the three regions do not differ on crime rankings.
A typical application of the Kruskal-Wallis test is to
assess whether three or more groups differ on a single
REFERENCE
variable that fails to meet the normality assumptions
of ANOVA. Since the variable of interest does not meet Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in
normality assumptions, we may not compare group means; one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American
instead we compare ranks. The null hypothesis specifies Statistical Association, 47, 583–621.
that the groups are subsets from the same population
(i.e., H0 : (a, b, c, . . . , n) ⊆p). To test the null hypothesis, SUGGESTED READINGS
we combine the groups into a single group and rank the
variable of interest. The new rank scores are summed by Cohen, B. H. (2008). Explaining psychological statistics (3rd ed.).
Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
group (Ta , Tb , . . . , Tn ) and, along with group sample sizes,
can be used to calculate the H statistic (see Equation 1). H Gibbons, J. D. (1993). Nonparametric statistics: An introduction
reflects the variance in ranks between groups and closely (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 90). Newbury
Park, CA: Sage.
resembles the chi-square distribution. When testing the
null, we can use H and refer to a chi-square table with Hollander, M., & Wolfe, D. A. (1999). Nonparametric statistical
degrees of freedom equal to n (number of groups) minus methods (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
1. If H exceeds a critical value, we may conclude that
PATRICK E. MCKIGHT
the groups do not come from the same population; many
JULIUS NAJAB
researchers often conclude that the test is an omnibus test
George Mason University
for differences between groups, but many statisticians
object to this interpretation:
See also: Mann-Whitney U Test; Nonparametric Statistical
H = N − 1(gnn (ti − Ti ) /gsnn (tj − Ti ) )
2 2
(1) Tests

where nn is the sample size of the corresponding group, g is


the sum of the group n, snn is the sum of the corresponding

The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology, edited by Irving B. Weiner and W. Edward Craighead.
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

You might also like