1. Discuss the difference between the presidential and parliamentary forms of government.

The presidential and parliamentary regimes have a multi-sectoral government with a

legislative branch that makes the laws and the executive branch that enforces them and the
judiciary to view them in the presidential system the boundaries that distinguish certain
divisions are firm and clearly defined, while the parliamentary system appears to be blurred.
The executive gets a disproportionate amount of scrutiny in these structures. The executive in
the presidential system is the president while the parliamentary system has two prime
ministers, and if the government is the monarchy, the other executive is the king or queen.
2. Describe the form election used by the United and the Philippines
United States elections are held for presidential, state and local government offices.
On the federal level, by an election college, the head of state of the republic, the president, is
indirectly chosen by the citizens of each country. These voters are almost all voting for their
state's popular vote today. The citizens in each state elect directly all the representatives of
the federal assembly, the Congress. While in the Philippines has multi-party system with
multiple parties where no party typically has an ability to win power alone; parties have to
negotiate together in order to create a majority government. a multi-party system The
Commission of Election (COMELEC) shall oversee the elections.
3. Discuss the Stages of the Policy Process
Initiation- This stage refers to the phase a regulation and the question to be discussed. The
public interest is remembered.
Formulation- The public government in question is at this point evaluating the different
policy alternatives that it finds potential solutions. It is worth noting that coalitions aim to
prioritize both the issue and the solution through the application of lobbying techniques.
Implementation- The enforcing conditions of the policy are defined at this point, which will
directly influence the potential outcome of the policy. Various considerations tend to define
the real consequences of a strategy and how well it meets its targets.
Evolution- This is where a policy is tested to ensure that its execution and its consequences
are in accordance with the priorities set directly or indirectly.
Review- When a program has been reviewed, even though it has not been tested, amend or to
cancel are the possibilities.