Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Melanoma Minhr Nejm 2006
Melanoma Minhr Nejm 2006
review article
mechanisms of disease
Melanoma
Arlo J. Miller, M.D., Ph.D., and Martin C. Mihm, Jr., M.D.
A
lthough melanoma accounts for only 4 percent of all derma- From the Dermatopathology Unit, Massa-
tologic cancers, it is responsible for 80 percent of deaths from skin cancer; chusetts General Hospital, and Harvard
Medical School — both in Boston. Ad-
only 14 percent of patients with metastatic melanoma survive for five years.1 dress reprint requests to Dr. Mihm at the
The intractability of advanced melanoma shows how much we have to learn about Department of Dermatopathology, Massa-
the changes that facilitate the vertical growth and deep invasion of melanoma and chusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St.,
Warren 827, Boston, MA 02114.
about the mechanisms that block the effectiveness of chemotherapy.
The Clark model of the progression of melanoma emphasizes the stepwise trans- N Engl J Med 2006;355:51-65.
formation of melanocytes to melanoma (Fig. 1). The model depicts the proliferation Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Risk Factors
The strongest risk factors for melanoma are a family history of melanoma, multiple
benign or atypical nevi, and a previous melanoma. Immunosuppression, sun sensi-
tivity, and exposure to ultraviolet radiation are additional risk factors. Each of these
risk factors corresponds to a genetic predisposition or an environmental stressor
that contributes to the genesis of melanoma. Each factor is understood to various
degrees at a molecular level. For example, 25 to 40 percent of the members of
melanoma-prone families have mutations in cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A
(CDKN2A)5 (Table 1 lists all genes mentioned in this article), and a few rare kindreds
have mutations in cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4). There is a rational basis for a
link between susceptibility to melanoma and a mutation in CDKN2A or CDK4 since
both are tumor-suppressor genes. They will be discussed later in the context of
disease progression. In addition, sensitivity to ultraviolet light is associated with a
polymorphic genetic determinant that affects susceptibility to melanoma, thereby
highlighting an important genetic–environmental interaction.
growth of melanomas with BRAF mutations can tumors.40 The development of melanoma in such
be suppressed by the inhibition of the down- mice requires mutations in other genes, such as
stream MEK enzymes, providing a possible target an activating mutation in H-RAS, an upstream
for treatment.28 component in MAPK signaling, which triggers
MEK signaling.41 Genes that encode CDK4 and
Cytologic Atypia and Tumor-Suppressor cyclin D1 (CCND1) encode proteins that act down-
Genes stream of INK4A, and they are also mutated in
The Clark model suggests that the next step toward some melanomas. These targets of INK4A func-
melanoma is the development of cytologic atypia tion together as part of a complex that promotes
in dysplastic nevi, which may arise from preex- the progression of the cell cycle by phosphorylat-
isting benign nevi or as new lesions. The molecu- ing retinoblastoma (Rb) protein, a cell-cycle reg-
lar abnormalities at this stage of progression ulator. Rare melanoma kindreds carry germ-line
affect cell growth, DNA repair, and the suscepti- mutations in CDK4 that disrupt cell-cycle control
bility to cell death. In 25 to 40 percent of cases of by preventing the molecular interaction that allows
familial melanoma,6 a genetic defect inactivates INK4A to repress CDK4.42 Mice that carry the hu-
CDKN2A, a single gene that encodes two tumor- man CDK4 mutation are prone to melanoma when
suppressor proteins, p16INK4A and p19ARF29,30; in exposed to various carcinogens.43
25 to 50 percent of nonfamilial melanoma,31,32 a The D-type cyclin CD1 may have an oncogenic
different tumor-suppressor gene, phosphatase and role in acral melanoma, in which amplification of
tensin homologue (PTEN) (Fig. 3), is inactivated the CCND1 gene and overexpression of cyclin CD1
by mutation.33,34 In murine models of melanoma, protein occur more frequently than in melanoma
mutation of either CDKN2A or PTEN alone fails to at other sites.44 Inhibition of CCND1 (with anti-
cause melanoma, but when combined with each sense CCND1) causes apoptosis of human mela-
other or with mutations in other genes,35 mela- noma xenografts implanted in immunodeficient
nomas do arise. Mutation of CDKN2A or PTEN is mice, without an apparent effect on normal mela-
only one molecular step on the path to the devel- nocytes.
opment of melanoma, but it is unclear precisely Alternative splicing of various exons within
when such mutations occur. The increased sus- CDKN2A yields two distinct tumor-suppressor pro-
ceptibility to melanoma that is associated with teins, INK4A and alternate reading frame (ARF)
loss of the germ-line CDKN2A gene suggests that (Fig. 3).39 The ARF gene (also called p14ARF) de-
this genetic lesion increases the probability that rives its name from the use of an alternative
dysplastic nevi will become malignant or increas- reading frame of the exons it shares with INK4A.
es the rate of the development of new melanoma ARF functions as a tumor suppressor by arrest-
without a precursor. ing the cell cycle or promoting cell death after
DNA damage or when various oncogenes or loss
CDKN2A of Rb stimulate aberrant cell proliferation. ARF
The G1–S checkpoint that governs the commitment participates in the core regulatory process that
of a cell to DNA replication during the S phase controls levels of the p53 protein. It acts through
(synthesis of DNA) is a site where many pathways the mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) protein,
that control cell division converge36,37 (Fig. 4B). which triggers the ubiquination of p53, thereby
In some familial and sporadic cases of melano- instigating its destruction in the proteosome.
ma,36,37 the CDKN2A locus is lost by homozygous ARF binds to MDM2, sequestering it from p53
deletion of a portion of chromosome 9.36-38 One and in this way causes p53 to accumulate; p53
of the genes in this locus encodes INK4A, then arrests the cell cycle at the G2–M site, allow-
(p16INK4A), a protein that blocks the cell cycle at ing for repair of damaged DNA or the induction
the G1–S checkpoint by inhibiting cyclin-depen- of apoptosis.45,46 In cells, ARF deficiency abro-
dent kinases. INK4A (an inhibitor of CDK4) sup- gates oncogene-induced senescence and increases
presses the proliferation of cells with damaged susceptibility to transformation.47 In vitro, im-
DNA or activated oncogenes and also acts when mortalization of cells often occurs with the loss
cells are old or crowded.39 Mice lacking INK4A of either ARF or p53.48 In animals, ARF deficiency
appear normal but are abnormally sensitive to shortens the time required for the development
carcinogens and prone to the development of of melanoma after exposure to ultraviolet light;
when both gene products of CDKN2A (INK4A and some 10.33,34,50 PTEN encodes a phosphatase that
attenuates signaling by a variety of growth factors
ARF) are deficient, the latent period is even short-
that use phosphatidylinositol phosphate (PIP3) as
er.49 These data suggest how ARF facilitates the
progression of melanoma and indicate that the an intracellular signal. In the presence of such
low frequency of p53 mutations in melanoma is growth factors, intracellular levels of PIP3 rapidly
increase. This increase triggers the activation of
partly related to loss of ARF, which renders the
p53 pathway inactive.39 protein kinase B (PKB, also called AKT) by phos-
phorylation (Fig. 3). Activated AKT phosphory-
PTEN, AKT, and Cell Death lates and inactivates proteins that suppress the
A second chromosomal region that is frequently cell cycle or stimulate apoptosis, thereby facilitat-
affected by homozygous deletion in melanoma ing the proliferation and survival of cells. PTEN
and other cancers is the PTEN locus on chromo- normally keeps PIP3 levels low; in its absence,
Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A or inhibitor Tumor suppressor–negative regulator of cell prolif- Germ-line mutations in some familial melanomas;
of kinase 4A (CDKN2A or INK4A) eration sporadic deletions, promoter inactivation, loss
of heterozygosity in many melanomas
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) Promoter of cell proliferation Protein insensitive to inhibition by INK4A due to
rare familial germ-line mutations at R24C
Cyclin D1 (CCND1) Promoter of cell proliferation Sporadic amplification in acral melanoma
www.nejm.org
n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l
many melanomas
Tumor protein 53 (p53) Tumor suppressor that induces apoptosis and sup- Expression usually present in melanoma
pressed proliferation after DNA damage
july 6, 2006
Mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) Targeter of p53 for ubiquination and destruction Up-regulated in presence of ARF mutation
Downloaded from nejm.org at GLASGOW UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on April 6, 2013. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
MSH and MITF
Pro-opiomelanocortin or α-melanocyte–stimulating Signaling molecule important in pigmentation Increased melanoma vertical-growth phase
hormone (POMC or α-MSH)
Melanocortin receptor 1 (MC1R) Receptor for α-MSH Polymorphic gene affecting hair and skin color
and response to ultraviolet radiation
Adenylate cyclase (AC) Producer of cyclic AMP Up-regulated
cAMP response element–binding protein (CREB) Transcription factor Up-regulated; affects MITF and melanocyte
differentiation
Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor Transcription factor Sporadic amplification of chromosomal region
(MITF)
Tyrosinase (TYR) Pigment synthesis Decreased expression
Tyrosinase-related protein 1 (TYRP1) Pigment synthesis Decreased expression
Dopachrome tautomerase (DCT) Pigment synthesis Decreased expression
Melan-A (MLANA) Antigen recognized by melan-A and melanoma anti- Decreased expression
www.nejm.org
melanoma
mechanisms of disease
Cell adhesion
Wingless-type mammary tumor virus integration- Protooncogene, secreted growth factor that inacti- Pathway up-regulated
site family (WNT) vates
Downloaded from nejm.org at GLASGOW UNIVERSITY LIBRARY on April 6, 2013. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
57
The n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l of m e dic i n e
levels of PIP3 and active (phosphorylated) AKT in- also be increased in cells by mutations that cause
crease. Increased AKT activity prolongs cell sur- the amplification and overexpression of the pro-
vival through the inactivation of BCL-2 antago- tein. Restoration of PTEN in cultured mouse me-
nist of cell death (BAD) protein and increases lanocytes decreases the ability of the cells to form
cell proliferation by increasing CCND1 expres- tumors.52 In model systems, suppression of AKT3,
sion, and affects many other cell-survival and cell- a member of the AKT family, reduces the survival
cycle genes through the activation of the forkhead of melanoma cells and the growth of human mela-
(FKHR) transcription factor.32,51 AKT activity can nomas implanted in immunodeficient nude mice.53
markers, and cause melanocytes to become den- chronically exposed (head and neck) or intermit-
dritic.88 tently exposed (chest and back) and in acral and
Progression from the radial-growth phase to mucosal skin. For example, CCND1 amplification
the vertical-growth phase of melanoma is marked occurs predominantly in acral regions,44 whereas
by the loss of E-cadherin and the expression of activating mutations in BRAF occur most frequent-
N-cadherin89-91 (Fig. 2). N-cadherin is a character- ly in skin sites of intermittent sun exposure.106
istic of invasive carcinomas and enables metastatic
spread by permitting melanoma cells to interact Model ing Mel a nom a
with other N-cadherin–expressing cells, such as Pro gr e s sion
dermal fibroblasts and the vascular endothelium.87
Besides these changes in cell adhesion, decreased For many of the molecular lesions we have de-
E-cadherin expression92 and aberrant N-cadherin scribed, animal models have provided validation.
expression increase the survival of melanoma A surprising new model is the zebrafish, in which
cells by stimulating β-catenin signaling.93,94 premalignant and malignant lesions can be cre-
ated by the expression of mutant BRAF with or
Integrins without p53 mutation.22 This model is the only
The integrins mediate cell contacts with fibro- currently tractable system in which genetic
nectin, collagens, and laminin, components of the screens can be performed for modifiers of mela-
extracellular matrix.95 Transition from radial to noma.
vertical growth of melanoma is associated with Human melanomas that are grafted onto or
the expression of αVβ3 integrin.96 This integrin injected into nude mice allow measures of the
induces expression of matrix metalloproteinase 2, tumors’ metastatic potential and have allowed for
an enzyme that degrades the collagen in basement the testing of therapeutic interventions. Genetic
membrane.97-99 In addition, αVβ3 integrin increas- manipulation of mice has validated the contribu-
es expression of the prosurvival gene BCL-2100 and tion of many genetic alterations in melanoma, but
stimulates the motility of melanoma cells through there are fundamental differences between mouse
the reorganization of melanoma cytoskeleton.101 and human skin. Mouse melanocytes occur in
These observations form a rationale for the de- hair follicles and the dermis, rather than in the
velopment of integrin antagonists to treat mela- epidermis, as in humans. To circumvent this
noma.102 problem, human melanocytes can be altered in
cell culture and combined with keratinocytes to
Patterns of Genetic Alteration produce graft material. Using this system, the
The genetic changes in melanoma can be seen as inactivation of p53 and the simultaneous intro-
particular combinations of molecular lesions that duction of activated N-RAS, CDK4, and telomer-
interrupt a precise set of pathways, each with a ase led to darkly pigmented grafts that became
crucial role in the development of melanoma. grossly ulcerated and displayed histologic features
The MEK pathway can be activated by a mutation of melanoma, including vertical invasion.107 This
in either NRAS or BRAF, and an NRAS mutation experimental system provides a novel model to
can activate both the MEK and PTEN pathways. test invasion and metastases of transformed hu-
Similarly, INK4A, CDK4, and CCND1 function in man melanocytes in a host organism.
a unique pathway that affects the cell cycle; a mu- Supported by a grant (MCM202534) from the Cancer Research
Institute of New York and a grant (T32-GM07753, to Dr. Miller)
tation of INK4A has similar consequences as a from the National Institute of General Medical Science. No other
mutation of CCND1 or CDK4.103-105 potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
There are particular genetic changes in mela- We are indebted to Drs. David E. Fisher, Adriano Piris, Jenni-
fer Y. Lin, and Jennifer C. Broder for their critical reading of the
nomas in different sites, consistent differences manuscript, and to Dr. Claudio Clemente for contributing im-
related to ultraviolet exposure on sites that are ages for Figure 1.
References
1. Cancer facts & figures, 2003. Atlanta: sor lesions of superficial spreading and in melanoma. N Engl J Med 2005;353:
American Cancer Society, 2003. nodular melanoma. Hum Pathol 1984;15: 2135-47.
2. Clark WH Jr, Elder DE, Guerry D IV, 1147-65. 4. Alonso SR, Ortiz P, Pollan M, et al.
Epstein MN, Greene MH, Van Horn M. 3. Curtin JA, Fridlyand J, Kageshita T, Progression in cutaneous malignant mel-
A study of tumor progression: the precur- et al. Distinct sets of genetic alterations anoma is associated with distinct expres-
sion profiles: a tissue microarray-based 20. Omholt K, Platz A, Kanter L, Ring- 36. Kamb A, Shattuck-Eidens D, Eeles R,
study. Am J Pathol 2004;164:193-203. borg U, Hansson J. NRAS and BRAF et al. Analysis of the p16 gene (CDKN2) as
5. Aitken J, Welch J, Duffy D, et al. CD- mutations arise early during melanoma a candidate for the chromosome 9p mela-
KN2A variants in a population-based sam- pathogenesis and are preserved through- noma susceptibility locus. Nat Genet 1994;
ple of Queensland families with melano- out tumor progression. Clin Cancer Res 8:23-6.
ma. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:446-52. 2003;9:6483-8. 37. Hussussian CJ, Struewing JP, Gold-
6. Thompson JF, Scolyer RA, Kefford RF. 21. Pollock PM, Harper UL, Hansen KS, stein AM, et al. Germline p16 mutations
Cutaneous melanoma. Lancet 2005;365: et al. High frequency of BRAF mutations in familial melanoma. Nat Genet 1994;8:
687-701. in nevi. Nat Genet 2003;33:19-20. 15-21.
7. Gilchrest BA, Eller MS, Geller AC, 22. Patton EE, Widlund HR, Kutok JL, et 38. Pollock PM, Trent JM. The genetics of
Yaar M. The pathogenesis of melanoma al. BRAF mutations are sufficient to pro- cutaneous melanoma. Clin Lab Med 2000;
induced by ultraviolet radiation. N Engl J mote nevi formation and cooperate with 20:667-90.
Med 1999;340:1341-8. p53 in the genesis of melanoma. Curr Biol 39. Sharpless E, Chin L. The INK4a/ARF
8. MacKie RM. Risk factors for the de- 2005;15:249-54. locus and melanoma. Oncogene 2003;22:
velopment of primary cutaneous malig- 23. Michaloglou C, Vredeveld LC, Soen- 3092-8.
nant melanoma. Dermatol Clin 2002;20: gas MS, et al. BRAFE600-associated se- 40. Serrano M, Lee H, Chin L, Cordon-
597-600. nescence-like cell cycle arrest of human Cardo C, Beach D, DePinho RA. Role of
9. Marks R. Epidemiology of melanoma. naevi. Nature 2005;436:720-4. the INK4a locus in tumor suppression
Clin Exp Dermatol 2000;25:459-63. 24. Eskandarpour M, Kiaii S, Zhu C, Cas- and cell mortality. Cell 1996;85:27-37.
10. Naysmith L, Waterston K, Ha T, et al. tro J, Sakko AJ, Hansson J. Suppression of 41. Chin L, Pomerantz J, Polsky D, et al.
Quantitative measures of the effect of the oncogenic NRAS by RNA interference in- Cooperative effects of INK4a and ras in
melanocortin 1 receptor on human pig- duces apoptosis of human melanoma melanoma susceptibility in vivo. Genes
mentary status. J Invest Dermatol 2004; cells. Int J Cancer 2005;115:65-73. Dev 1997;11:2822-34.
122:423-8. 25. Hingorani SR, Jacobetz MA, Robert- 42. Zuo L, Weger J, Yang Q, et al. Germ-
11. Valverde P, Healy E, Jackson I, Rees JL, son GP, Herlyn M, Tuveson DA. Suppres- line mutations in the p16INK4a binding
Thody AJ. Variants of the melanocyte- sion of BRAF(V599E) in human melano- domain of CDK4 in familial melanoma.
stimulating hormone receptor gene are ma abrogates transformation. Cancer Res Nat Genet 1996;12:97-9.
associated with red hair and fair skin in 2003;63:5198-202. 43. Sotillo R, Garcia JF, Ortega S, et al.
humans. Nat Genet 1995;11:328-30. 26. Hoeflich KP, Gray DC, Eby MT, et al. Invasive melanoma in Cdk4-targeted mice.
12. Frandberg PA, Doufexis M, Kapas S, Oncogenic BRAF is required for tumor Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:13312-
Chhajlani V. Human pigmentation pheno- growth and maintenance in melanoma 7.
type: a point mutation generates non- models. Cancer Res 2006;66:999-1006. 44. Sauter ER, Yeo UC, von Stemm A, et
functional MSH receptor. Biochem Biophys 27. Lyons JF, Wilhelm S, Hibner B, Bollag al. Cyclin D1 is a candidate oncogene in
Res Commun 1998;245:490-2. G. Discovery of a novel Raf kinase inhibi- cutaneous melanoma. Cancer Res 2002;
13. Kennedy C, ter Huurne J, Berkhout M, tor. Endocr Relat Cancer 2001;8:219-25. 62:3200-6.
et al. Melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) 28. Solit DB, Garraway LA, Pratilas CA, et 45. Pomerantz J, Schreiber-Agus N, Liege-
gene variants are associated with an in- al. BRAF mutation predicts sensitivity to ois NJ, et al. The Ink4a tumor suppressor
creased risk for cutaneous melanoma MEK inhibition. Nature 2006;439:358-62. gene product, p19Arf, interacts with MDM2
which is largely independent of skin type 29. Kamb A, Gruis NA, Weaver-Feldhaus J, and neutralizes MDM2’s inhibition of
and hair color. J Invest Dermatol 2001; et al. A cell cycle regulator potentially in- p53. Cell 1998;92:713-23.
117:294-300. volved in genesis of many tumor types. 46. Harris SL, Levine AJ. The p53 path-
14. Braig M, Schmitt CA. Oncogene- Science 1994;264:436-40. way: positive and negative feedback loops.
induced senescence: putting the brakes on 30. Nobori T, Miura K, Wu DJ, Lois A, Oncogene 2005;24:2899-908.
tumor development. Cancer Res 2006;66: Takabayashi K, Carson DA. Deletions of 47. Sharpless NE, Ramsey MR, Balasub-
2881-4. the cyclin-dependent kinase-4 inhibitor ramanian P, Castrillon DH, DePinho RA.
15. Welsh CF, Roovers K, Villanueva J, Liu gene in multiple human cancers. Nature The differential impact of p16(INK4a) or
Y, Schwartz MA, Assoian RK. Timing of 1994;368:753-6. p19(ARF) deficiency on cell growth and
cyclin D1 expression within G1 phase is 31. Flores JF, Walker GJ, Glendening JM, tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2004;23:379-85.
controlled by Rho. Nat Cell Biol 2001;3: et al. Loss of the p16INK4a and p15INK4b 48. Kamijo T, Zindy F, Roussel MF, et al.
950-7. genes, as well as neighboring 9p21 mark- Tumor suppression at the mouse INK4a
16. Brunet A, Roux D, Lenormand P, ers, in sporadic melanoma. Cancer Res locus mediated by the alternative reading
Dowd S, Keyse S, Pouyssegur J. Nuclear 1996;56:5023-32. frame product p19ARF. Cell 1997;91:649-
translocation of p42/p44 mitogen-activat- 32. Wu H, Goel V, Haluska FG. PTEN sig- 59.
ed protein kinase is required for growth naling pathways in melanoma. Oncogene 49. Recio JA, Noonan FP, Takayama H, et
factor-induced gene expression and cell 2003;22:3113-22. al. Ink4a/arf deficiency promotes ultravi-
cycle entry. EMBO J 1999;18:664-74. 33. Li J, Yen C, Liaw D, et al. PTEN, a pu- olet radiation-induced melanomagenesis.
17. Lin AW, Barradas M, Stone JC, van tative protein tyrosine phosphatase gene Cancer Res 2002;62:6724-30.
Aelst L, Serrano M, Lowe SW. Premature mutated in human brain, breast, and pros- 50. Guldberg P, Thor Straten P, Birck A,
senescence involving p53 and p16 is acti- tate cancer. Science 1997;275:1943-7. Ahrenkiel V, Kirkin AF, Zeuthen J. Disrup-
vated in response to constitutive MEK/ 34. Steck PA, Pershouse MA, Jasser SA, et tion of the MMAC1/PTEN gene by dele-
MAPK mitogenic signaling. Genes Dev al. Identification of a candidate tumour tion or mutation is a frequent event in
1998;12:3008-19. suppressor gene, MMAC1, at chromosome malignant melanoma. Cancer Res 1997;57:
18. Albino AP, Nanus DM, Mentle IR, et al. 10q23.3 that is mutated in multiple ad- 3660-3.
Analysis of ras oncogenes in malignant vanced cancers. Nat Genet 1997;15:356- 51. Cantley LC, Neel BG. New insights
melanoma and precursor lesions: correla- 62. into tumor suppression: PTEN suppresses
tion of point mutations with differentia- 35. You MJ, Castrillon DH, Bastian BC, et tumor formation by restraining the phos-
tion phenotype. Oncogene 1989;4:1363-74. al. Genetic analysis of Pten and Ink4a/Arf phoinositide 3-kinase/AKT pathway. Proc
19. Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, et al. interactions in the suppression of tumori- Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:4240-5.
Mutations of the BRAF gene in human genesis in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 52. Stahl JM, Cheung M, Sharma A, Trive-
cancer. Nature 2002;417:949-54. 2002;99:1455-60. di NR, Shanmugam S, Robertson GP.
Loss of PTEN promotes tumor develop- ness cutaneous malignant melanoma. Can- 80. Brembeck FH, Schwarz-Romond T,
ment in malignant melanoma. Cancer cer Res 2000;60:5012-6. Bakkers J, Wilhelm S, Hammerschmidt
Res 2003;63:2881-90. 67. Seiter S, Monsurro V, Nielsen MB, et al. M, Birchmeier W. Essential role of BCL9-2
53. Stahl JM, Sharma A, Cheung M, et al. Frequency of MART-1/MelanA and gp100/ in the switch between beta-catenin’s ad-
Deregulated Akt3 activity promotes de- PMel17-specific T cells in tumor metasta- hesive and transcriptional functions. Genes
velopment of malignant melanoma. Can- ses and cultured tumor-infiltrating lym- Dev 2004;18:2225-30.
cer Res 2004;64:7002-10. phocytes. J Immunother 2002;25:252-63. 81. Rubinfeld B, Robbins P, El-Gamil M,
54. Hodgkinson CA, Moore KJ, Nakaya- 68. Takeuchi H, Kuo C, Morton DL, Wang Albert I, Porfiri E, Polakis P. Stabilization
ma A, et al. Mutations at the mouse mi- HJ, Hoon DS. Expression of differentia- of beta-catenin by genetic defects in mel-
crophthalmia locus are associated with tion melanoma-associated antigen genes anoma cell lines. Science 1997;275:1790-
defects in a gene encoding a novel basic- is associated with favorable disease out- 2.
helix-loop-helix-zipper protein. Cell 1993; come in advanced-stage melanomas. Can- 82. Cowley GP, Smith ME. Cadherin ex-
74:395-404. cer Res 2003;63:441-8. pression in melanocytic naevi and malig-
55. Nishimura EK, Granter SR, Fisher DE. 69. Miller AJ, Du J, Rowan S, Hershey CL, nant melanomas. J Pathol 1996;179:183-7.
Mechanisms of hair graying: incomplete Widlund HR, Fisher DE. Transcriptional 83. Rimm DL, Caca K, Hu G, Harrison
melanocyte stem cell maintenance in the regulation of the melanoma prognostic FB, Fearon ER. Frequent nuclear/cytoplas-
niche. Science 2005;307:720-4. marker melastatin (TRPM1) by MITF in mic localization of beta-catenin without
56. Widlund HR, Fisher DE. Microphtha- melanocytes and melanoma. Cancer Res exon 3 mutations in malignant melano-
lamia-associated transcription factor: a 2004;64:509-16. ma. Am J Pathol 1999;154:325-9.
critical regulator of pigment cell devel- 70. Duncan LM, Deeds J, Hunter J, et al. 84. Sanders DS, Blessing K, Hassan GA,
opment and survival. Oncogene 2003;22: Down-regulation of the novel gene mela- Bruton R, Marsden JR, Jankowski J. Al-
3035-41. statin correlates with potential for mela- terations in cadherin and catenin expres-
57. Lerner AB, Shiohara T, Boissy RE, Ja- noma metastasis. Cancer Res 1998;58: sion during the biological progression of
cobson KA, Lamoreux ML, Moellmann GE. 1515-20. melanocytic tumours. Mol Pathol 1999;52:
A mouse model for vitiligo. J Invest Der- 71. King R, Weilbaecher KN, McGill G, 151-7.
matol 1986;87:299-304. Cooley E, Mihm M, Fisher DE. Microph- 85. Widlund HR, Horstmann MA, Price
58. Steingrimsson E, Moore KJ, Lamor- thalmia transcription factor: a sensitive ER, et al. Beta-catenin-induced melanoma
eux ML, et al. Molecular basis of mouse and specific melanocyte marker for mela- growth requires the downstream target
microphthalmia (mi) mutations helps ex- noma diagnosis. Am J Pathol 1999;155:731- Microphthalmia-associated transcription
plain their developmental and phenotypic 8. factor. J Cell Biol 2002;158:1079-87.
consequences. Nat Genet 1994;8:256-63. 72. Miettinen M, Fernandez M, Franssila 86. Shtutman M, Zhurinsky J, Simcha I, et
59. McGill GG, Horstmann M, Widlund K, Gatalica Z, Lasota J, Sarlomo-Rikala M. al. The cyclin D1 gene is a target of the
HR, et al. Bcl2 regulation by the melano- Microphthalmia transcription factor in the beta-catenin/LEF-1 pathway. Proc Natl Acad
cyte master regulator Mitf modulates lin- immunohistochemical diagnosis of meta- Sci U S A 1999;96:5522-7.
eage survival and melanoma cell viability. static melanoma: comparison with four 87. Hsu M, Andl T, Li G, Meinkoth JL,
Cell 2002;109:707-18. other melanoma markers. Am J Surg Herlyn M. Cadherin repertoire determines
60. Banerjee D. Genasense (Genta Inc). Pathol 2001;25:205-11. partner-specific gap junctional communi-
Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2001;2:574-80. 73. Granter SR, Weilbaecher KN, Quigley cation during melanoma progression.
61. Goding CR. Mitf from neural crest to C, Fisher DE. Role for microphthalmia J Cell Sci 2000;113:1535-42.
melanoma: signal transduction and tran- transcription factor in the diagnosis of 88. Valyi-Nagy IT, Hirka G, Jensen PJ,
scription in the melanocyte lineage. metastatic malignant melanoma. Appl Im- Shih IM, Juhasz I, Herlyn M. Undifferenti-
Genes Dev 2000;14:1712-28. munohistochem Mol Morphol 2002;10:47- ated keratinocytes control growth, mor-
62. Du J, Miller AJ, Widlund HR, Horst- 51. phology, and antigen expression of normal
mann MA, Ramaswamy S, Fisher DE. 74. Garraway LA, Widlund HR, Rubin MA, melanocytes through cell-cell contact. Lab
MLANA/MART1 and SILV/PMEL17/GP100 et al. Integrative genomic analyses iden- Invest 1993;69:152-9.
are transcriptionally regulated by MITF in tify MITF as a lineage survival oncogene 89. Danen EH, de Vries TJ, Morandini R,
melanocytes and melanoma. Am J Pathol amplified in malignant melanoma. Na- Ghanem GG, Ruiter DJ, van Muijen GN.
2003;163:333-43. ture 2005;436:117-22. E-cadherin expression in human melano-
63. Baxter LL, Pavan WJ. Pmel17 expres- 75. Haass NK, Smalley KS, Li L, Herlyn M. ma. Melanoma Res 1996;6:127-31.
sion is Mitf-dependent and reveals cranial Adhesion, migration and communication 90. Hsu MY, Wheelock MJ, Johnson KR,
melanoblast migration during murine de- in melanocytes and melanoma. Pigment Herlyn M. Shifts in cadherin profiles be-
velopment. Gene Expr Patterns 2003;3:703- Cell Res 2005;18:150-9. tween human normal melanocytes and
7. 76. Balch CM, Soong SJ, Gershenwald JE, melanomas. J Investig Dermatol Symp
64. Loercher AE, Tank EMH, Delston RB, et al. Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 Proc 1996;1:188-94.
Harbour JW. MITF links differentiation melanoma patients: validation of the 91. Scott RA, Lauweryns B, Snead DM,
with cell cycle arrest in melanocytes by American Joint Committee on Cancer Haynes RJ, Mahida Y, Dua HS. E-cadherin
transcriptional activation of INK4A. J Cell melanoma staging system. J Clin Oncol distribution and epithelial basement mem-
Biol 2005;168:35-40. 2001;19:3622-34. brane characteristics of the normal human
65. Hofbauer GF, Kamarashev J, Geertsen 77. Johnson JP. Cell adhesion molecules conjunctiva and cornea. Eye 1997;11:607-
R, Boni R, Dummer R. Melan A/MART-1 in the development and progression of 12.
immunoreactivity in formalin-fixed par- malignant melanoma. Cancer Metastasis 92. Gottardi CJ, Wong E, Gumbiner BM.
affin-embedded primary and metastatic Rev 1999;18:345-57. E-cadherin suppresses cellular transfor-
melanoma: frequency and distribution. 78. Bienz M. Beta-catenin: a pivot between mation by inhibiting beta-catenin signal-
Melanoma Res 1998;8:337-43. cell adhesion and Wnt signalling. Curr ing in an adhesion-independent manner.
66. Salti GI, Manougian T, Farolan M, Biol 2005;15:R64-R67. J Cell Biol 2001;153:1049-60.
Shilkaitis A, Majumdar D, Das Gupta TK. 79. Gottardi CJ, Gumbiner BM. Adhesion 93. Qi J, Chen N, Wang J, Siu CH. Trans-
Micropthalmia transcription factor: a new signaling: how beta-catenin interacts with endothelial migration of melanoma cells
prognostic marker in intermediate-thick- its partners. Curr Biol 2001;11:R792-R794. involves N-cadherin-mediated adhesion and
activation of the beta-catenin signaling pha v beta 3 in hematogenous metastasis FG. Relative reciprocity of NRAS and
pathway. Mol Biol Cell 2005;16:4386-97. of human melanoma cells. Clin Exp Metas- PTEN/MMAC1 alterations in cutaneous
94. Li G, Satyamoorthy K, Herlyn M. tasis 2002;19:427-36. melanoma cell lines. Cancer Res 2000;60:
N-cadherin-mediated intercellular inter- 99. Hofmann UB, Westphal JR, Waas ET, 1800-4.
actions promote survival and migration Becker JC, Ruiter DJ, van Muijen GN. Co- 104. Daniotti M, Oggionni M, Ranzani T,
of melanoma cells. Cancer Res 2001;61: expression of integrin alpha(v)beta3 and et al. BRAF alterations are associated
3819-25. matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) co- with complex mutational profiles in ma-
95. Kuphal S, Bauer R, Bosserhoff AK. In- incides with MMP-2 activation: correla- lignant melanoma. Oncogene 2004;23:
tegrin signaling in malignant melanoma. tion with melanoma progression. J Invest 5968-77.
Cancer Metastasis Rev 2005;24:195-222. Dermatol 2000;115:625-32. 105. Tsao H, Goel V, Wu H, Yang G,
96. Danen EH, Ten Berge PJ, Van Muijen 100. Petitclerc E, Stromblad S, von Schal- Haluska FG. Genetic interaction between
GN, Van ’t Hof-Grootenboer AE, Brocker scha TL, et al. Integrin alpha(v)beta3 pro- NRAS and BRAF mutations and PTEN/
EB, Ruiter DJ. Emergence of alpha 5 beta motes M21 melanoma growth in human MMAC1 inactivation in melanoma. J Invest
1 fibronectin- and alpha v beta 3 vitronec- skin by regulating tumor cell survival. Dermatol 2004;122:337-41.
tin-receptor expression in melanocytic tu- Cancer Res 1999;59:2724-30. 106. Maldonado JL, Fridlyand J, Patel H,
mour progression. Histopathology 1994;24: 101. Li X, Regezi J, Ross FP, et al. Integrin et al. Determinants of BRAF mutations in
249-56. alphavbeta3 mediates K1735 murine mel- primary melanomas. J Natl Cancer Inst
97. Brooks PC, Stromblad S, Sanders LC, anoma cell motility in vivo and in vitro. 2003;95:1878-90.
et al. Localization of matrix metallopro- J Cell Sci 2001;114:2665-72. 107. Chudnovsky Y, Adams AE, Robbins
teinase MMP-2 to the surface of invasive 102. Dechantsreiter MA, Planker E, Matha PB, Lin Q, Khavari PA. Use of human tis-
cells by interaction with integrin alpha v B, et al. N-methylated cyclic RGD peptides sue to assess the oncogenic activity of
beta 3. Cell 1996;85:683-93. as highly active and selective alpha(V)beta(3) melanoma-associated mutations. Nat Gen-
98. Felding-Habermann B, Fransvea E, integrin antagonists. J Med Chem 1999; et 2005;37:745-9.
O’Toole TE, Manzuk L, Faha B, Hensler 42:3033-40. Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.
M. Involvement of tumor cell integrin al- 103. Tsao H, Zhang X, Fowlkes K, Haluska