Operational Problems

The most common problems in the operation of an activated

sludge plant are bulking sludge, rising sludge and nocardia
foam.

 Bulking Sludge

Bulking sludge has

• Poor settling characteristics and
• Poor compactability.

1
Two principle types of sludge bulking problems have been
identified.
 Caused by the growth of filamentous organisms
Or organisms that can grow in a filamentous form under
adverse conditions.
This is the predominant form of bulking

A Filamentous Bacteria Growing with Floc Microthrix Parvicella

 Caused by bound water

Bacterial floc swell and their density is reduced so they will
not settle.
2
The causes of sludge bulking are related to

1. The pysical and chemical characteristics of the WW

2. Treatment plant design limitations

3. Plant operation

1. WW characteristics that can affect sludge bulking include

fluctuations in flow & strength, pH, temperature, nutrient
content

2. Design limitations include air supply capacity, clarifier design,

return sludge pumping capacity, short circuting or poor mixing.
3
Bulking is often a problem in center feed circular tanks
where sludge is removed from the tank directly under
the point where mixed liquir enters the tank. In some
cases a large part of the sludge is actually retained in
the tank for many hours rather than the desired 30 min.
If this is the case then the design is fault and change the
withdrawal equipment.

4
3. Operational causes of filamentous bulking include

 low dissolved oxygen in the aeration tank

 insufficient nutrients: Especially quantity of nitrogen and
phosphorus important, also absence of trace element cause
bulking.
 widely varying organic waste loading
 low F/M ratio: The F/M ratio should be check to make it is
within normal range.
 Low F/M ratio encourage the growth of filamentous
organisms
 High F/M may result in the presence of small disperse flocs.
 insufficient soluble BOD5 gradient:

5
Limited dissolved oxygen has been noted more frequently than
any other cause. If the problem is due to limited D.O. Aerating
equipment should operate at full capacity. At least 2 mg/L of
dissolved oxygen in the aeration tank (under normal loading
conditions) should be maintained.

One of the kinetic features of filamentous organisms that

relates to this condition is that they are very competitive at low
substrate concentrations whether it be organic substrates, DO
or nutrients.

6
Filamentous bacteria such as Beggiatoa & Thiothrix
grow well on hydrogen sulfide & reduced substrates
respectively that would be found in septic WW.

When the influent WW contains fermentation products

such as volitile fatty acids & reduced sulfur compounds
(sulfides and thiosulfate) Thiothrix can proliferate.
Prechlorination of the WW has been done to prevent to
their growth.

7
Beggiatoa

Beggiatoa, a filamentous
bacterium that oxidizes
hydrogen sulfide.

8
Thiothrix

9
 In an emergency situation or while these factors are being
investigated chlorine & hydrogen peroxide may be used to
provide temporary help.
 Chlorination of return sludge has been practiced as a means
of controlling bulking sludge caused by filamentous
organisms.
 It is ineffective when bulking is due to light floc containing
bound water.
 Chlorination of return sludge in the range of 2-3 mg/L (in
severe cases 8-10 mg/L) of Cl2 per 1000 mg/L MLVSS is
suggested.

10
  Rising Sludge

 Occasionally sludge that has a good settling

characteristics will be observed to rise or float to the
surface.
 The cause of this phenomenon is denitrification.
 As nitrogen gas is formed in the sludge layer, much of
it is trapped in the sludge mass & sludge rises or floats.
 Rising sludge can be differentiated from bulking sludge
by noting the presence of small gas bubbles attached
to the floating solids.

11
Rising sludge problems may be overcome by

 Increase return activated sludge withdrawal rate (so

reduce detention time of the sludge in the clarifier)
 Increase the speed of the sludge-collecting
mechanism in the settling tank
 Increase sludge wasting rate (consequently
decreasing of the SRT achieved)

12
  Nocardia Foam

A viscous brown foam that covers the aeration basins &

secondary clarifiers has produced many problems, including
safety hazards, odors and changes in effluent quality.

The foam is associated with a slow growing filamentous organism

usually Nocardia genus.

Nocardia, Type 1863

Nocardia-like Filamentous Bacteria in Activated
Sludge Foam (Gram stained preparation). 13
Nocardia foam

14
Foam on weirs
Clarifier foam

15
 foaming in an aeration
basin

Probable causes:

 Low F/M in the aeration tank

 High MLSS due to insufficient sludge wasting
 Sludge reaeration
16
Measures for nocardia control include

1. Reducing sludge age (most commonly used)

2. Reducing the air flowrate to lower the depth of foam
accumulation
3. Adding a selector compartment to control the growth of
filamentous organisms
4. Injecting a bacterial additive
5. Chlorinating the return sludge
6. Spraying chloride solution or sprinkling powered calcium
hypochloride directly onto the foam
7. Reducing the pH (in the mixed liquor)

17
 The Selector Concept
The selector concept entails the selective growth of floc-
forming organisms at the initial stage of the biological process
by providing a high F/M ratio at controlled DO levels.
A selector is a small tank (20 to 60 min contact time) or a
series of tanks in which the incoming wastewater is mixed with
return sludge under aerobic, anoxic, and anaerobic conditions.

Specific growth rate h-1

The high substrate Nonfilamentous forms
concentration in the
selector favors the growth
of nonfilamentous Filamentous forms
organisms (see Fig. 8-13).

Substrate, mg/L

18
 Selector designs are based on either kinetic or metabolic
mechanisms
1. Kinetics-Based Selector:

 Selector designs based on biokinetic mechanisms provide for

reactor substrate concentrations that result in faster substrate
uptake by the floc forming bacteria.
 While filamentous bacteria are more efficient for substrate
utilization at low substrate concentrations, the floc forming
bacteria have higher growth rates at high soluble substrate
concentrations.

The kinetics-based
selector designs are
called high F/M selectors

19
2. Metabolic-Based Selector:

 With biological nutrient removal processes, improved

sludge settling characteristics, and, in many cases, minimal
filamentous bacteria growth has been observed.
 The anoxic or anaerobic metabolic conditions used in these
processes favor growth of the floc forming bacteria.
 The filamentous bacteria can not use nitrate or nitrite for an
electron acceptor, thus yielding a significant advantage to
denitrifying floc forming bacteria.

20
 Similarly, the filamentous bacteria do not store
polyphosphates and thus cannot consume acetate in
the anaerobic contact zone in biological phosphorus
removal designs, giving an advantage for substrate
uptake and growth to the phosphorus-storing bacteria.
 In some wastewater treatment facilities an anaerobic
selector has been used before the aeration tank in low
SRT even though phosphorus removal is not required.

21
 ACTIVATED SLUDGE
MODIFICATIONS
1. Conventional Activated Sludge Treatment
A typical flow pattern is

 As the tank geometry is long and narrow the mixing

regime approaches plug-flow.
 The air diffusers are generally locate evenly along one
side of the tank, therefore a spiral flow pattern is
produced.
22
 Operating experience soon revealed a number of problems
with this design.
 For example as the biomass was recycled back to the head of
the aeration tank and there mixed with incoming WW it was
observed that the oxygen requirements at this point often
exceeded the capability of the aeration system.
 It was also found that such a flow arrangement increased the
probability of process failure due to shock loads of toxic or
high-strength waste because these loads were controlled at
the enterance.
 Because of these deficiencies numerous modifications have
been proposed.

23
 2. Tapered Aeration

 This modification is identical to the conventional process.

 The basic difference between the two process is in the
diffuser arrangement.
 In tapered aeration diffusers are spaced so that more air is
supplied at the head of the tank, where the oxygen demand is
greatest, and is then decreased.
 It is more economical than conventional.

more air less air

24
 3. Step Aeration
Aeration tank
influent
effluent

Return sludge

 In this modification return sludge is mixed with a portion of the

WW and enters the head of the aeration tank.
 WW is also fed into the tank at different points along its
length.
 Advantages are a) Better equalization of waste load
b) Lower peak O2 demand
c) Smaller overall aeration tank volume
25
 4. Complete Mixing

 This process is an application of the flow regime of a

continuos flow stirred tank reactor (CSTR).
 The organic load on the aeration tank and the oxygen
demand are uniform throughout the tank length.
 Because of the rapid blending of feed and tank contents,
this process is highly resistant to shock loads.

26
5. Extended Aeration

 Extended aeration plants are generally small (applicable to

flow less than 1 MGD) because of the large aeration tanks
volumes required.
 Since it operates in endogenous respiration phase of the
growth curve which requires low organic loading & long
aeration time.
 Theoretically the extended air process is designed such
that all substrate removed is channeled into energy
metabolism & oxidized so that no excess biomass is
produced & sludge handling is eliminated.
 Since the oxygen requirement is high associated energy
costs is also high.

27
Lag Log Declining Endogenous

Contact Stabilization
Complete Mix
Step Aeration Extended Aeration
Conventional

High Rate

28
 6. Contact Stabilization
 Contact stabilization uses two separate tanks for the treatment
of the WW and the stabilization of the activated sludge
Complete mix
Contact tank
(adsroption)
Complete mix
Stabilization
tank

 The first tank provides contact between the biomass and the
WW for a short period of time 20-40 min.
 The insoluble organic material is first adsorbed to the m.o. floc
surface, then solubilized.

29
 In the second aeration tank, the organic material which
is adsorbed on the biomass surface is metabolized or
“stabilized” (retention time  4-8 hr)

 In these systems aeration volume requirements are

typically 50 percent less than conventional plug flow
because contact tank operates at a short retention time.

30
 7. Sludge Reaeration

 The flow scheme for sludge reaeration is similar to the

contact stabilization. But in this case it is assumed that all
substrate entering the reaeration tank is removed.
 Thus no substrate will be present in the recycle from the
reaeration tank to the aeration tank.

Complete mix

Aeration tank

Complete mix
Reaeration
tank

31
 8. High Rate Activated Sludge
 For this particular process modification, a low MLSS
concentrations are combined with high volumetric BOD
loadings.
 This system is characterized by short HRT, high sludge
recycle ratio, high F/M loading.
 The subtrate removal efficiency is low (typically 60-75 %)
mainly because the plant effluent generally contains a high
solids concentration. (This high solids concentration is a
result of the physiological state of the organisms in the
aeration tank.)
 Therefore, the high rate process can not be used where a
high quality effluent is required.
32
Lag Log Declining Endogenous

Contact Stabilization
Complete Mix
Step Aeration Extended Aeration
Conventional

High Rate

33
 9. Pure Oxygen Aeration

 High quality oxygen is used in stead of air in the

activated sludge process.
 This system is based on the principle that the rate of
transfer of oxygen is higher for pure oxygen than for
air.
 This results in higher availability of dissolved oxygen
leading to improved treatment and reduced production
of sludge.

34
 10. Oxidation Ditch
 The oxidation ditch consists of a
ring or oval channel and is
equipped with one or more
rotating rotors for WW aeration.
 Screened WW enters the ditch, is
aerated and circulates at about
0.25-0.35 m/s.
 Typically operation an extended
aeration mode with long
detention times.

35
 11. Orbal Process
 The orbal process is a variation
of the oxidation ditch.
 And uses a concentric channels
with the same structure.
 Wastewater enters the larger
outer channel and flows toward
the center through at least two
more channels before entering
an internal clarifier or a  Disk aerators mounted on a horizontal
distribution box. shaft provide aeration.

36
 12. Sequencing Batch Reactor

 This is a fill and draw type reactor

system.
 In SBR operation the process are
carried out sequencially in the 1. Fill
same tank.
 SBR systems have five steps in
common. 2. React

3. Settle(sedimentation clarification

4. Draw /decant

5. Idle
37
 13. Biolac Process
 Biolac® is a process that combines long
solids retention times with submerged
aeration in earthen basins.
 A major advantage of the Biolac® system
is its low installed cost.

 The BioFuser® fine bubble diffusers require no

mounting to basin floors or associated anchors
and leveling. These diffusers are suspended
from the BioFlex floating aeration chains.
38
 Note:
DESIGN EXAMPLE Prepare a hand-out for exam!!
Design a complete-mix activated sludge system
Given: Avarage design flow: 0.32 m3/s (6.3 Mgal/d)
Peak design flow: 0.8 m3/s (21.9 Mgal/d)
Raw WW BOD5 : 240 mg/L
Raw WW TSS : 280 mg/L
Effluent BOD5  20 mg/L
Effluent TSS  24 mg/L
WW Temperature : 20 oC
Operational parameters & biokinetic coefficients:
θc = 10 d, MLVSS=2400 mg/L (can be 3600 mg/L), VSS/TSS =0.8
TSS conc. in RAS =9300 mg/L, Y = 0.5 mg VSS/mg BOD5, kd= 0.06 /d
BOD5/ultimate BODu = 0.67
Assume: 1) BOD5 and TSS removal in primary clarifiers are 33 & 67 %
respectively.
2) Specific gravity of the primary sludge is 1.05 and the sludge has 4.4
% of solids content
3) Oxygen consumption is 1.42 mg per mg of cell oxidized.
39
 Secondary clarifier design
Pilot plant study for settling tank

MLSS (mg/L) 1200 1800 2400 3300 4000 5500 6800 8100
Initial settling 4.1 3.1 2.1 1.2 0.77 0.26 0.13 0.06
velocity m/h

Plot MLSS settling curve on log-log paper.

İnitial settling m/h

From this fiqure determine the solid fluxes.

MLSS conc. (mg/L) 40

X V1 (X*V1)
MLSS initial settling Solid flux
(mg/L) Velocity, m/h kg/(m .h)
2

Solids flux (kg/m2.h)

1000 4.2 4.2
1500 3.7 5.55 4

2000 2.8 5.6

2500 2.0 5.
2
3000 1.5 4.5
4000 0.76 3.04
5000 0.41 2.04
6000 0.22 1.32 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000
Solids conc. in return
7000 0.105 0.74 sludge mg/L
8000 0.062 0.5 Determine limiting solids flux for an
underflow concentration of 9300 mg/L
9000 0.033 0.3
(desired underflow)
The limiting solid flux value = 1.3 kg/m2.h

41
 Design flow to secondary clarifiers, Q
Q = avarage design flow + return sludge flow – MLSS wasted
= 27563 + 12942 – 283 m3/d
= 40222 m3/d
Use two clarifiers each one w/ flow of 20200 m3/d
Area of clarifier
A: area of the secondary clarifier m2
QX Q : influent flow of the clarifier m3/h
A X: MLSS concentration kg/m3
SF SF: limiting solids flux kg/m2.h
3 3
For each clarifier A  20200 m / d ( 2400 g / m / 0.8)
 1942 m 2
(24 h / 1 d *1000 g / kg ) *1.3kg / m 2 .h
A= π.r2 =1942  r ≈ 25 m
Determine recycle ratio required to maintain MLSS conc at 3000 mg/L
(Q+Qr) 3000 = Q X + QrXu Q (3000-X) = Qr (Xu-3000)
Qr/Q = 3000-X/(Xu-3000) = α =recycle ratio
Q = influent flow
Qr= recycle ratio When Xu = 9300 mg/L and X= 92.8 mg/L
X= influent SS conc α = 0.46 42
Xu underflow SS conc