Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Level: Professional
Module code: 1
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................4
2. MACRO-ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS.....................................................................5
2.1. PESTEL......................................................................................................................5
a) Political Factors......................................................................................................................... 5
b) Economical Factors................................................................................................................ 5
c) Social-Cultural Factor............................................................................................................ 6
d) Technological Factor............................................................................................................. 6
e) Environmental/Ecological Factors................................................................................7
f) Legal Factors.............................................................................................................................. 7
2.2. Porter’s Five Forces Industry Analysis...................................................................8
a) Threat of New Entrants......................................................................................................... 8
b) Bargaining Power of Buyers............................................................................................. 8
c) Bargaining Power of Suppliers........................................................................................9
d) Threat of Substitutes.............................................................................................................. 9
e) Rivalry among Competitors............................................................................................... 9
3. INTERNAL ANALYSIS10
3.1. VRIO.........................................................................................................................10
4. CRITICAL EVALUATION.............................................................................................12
4.1. SWOT.......................................................................................................................12
5. ANSOFF.........................................................................................................................15
6. BCG MATRICS ……………………………………………………………….............15
8. CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................................20
9. RECOMMENDATIONS…………………………………………………………………20
9. REFERENCES..............................................................................................................23
Executive Summary
market leader in airline industry. They are well known by promising and
provide the lowest fares to their customers. The slogan of ‘Now Everyone can
fly’ has become their famous branding and successfully stand out among their
competitors.
educating their staffs to work hard to fulfil the mission and vision of the
score which shows that they are not affected by both internal and external
factors. This shows a good sign for them as they would be able to figure out
Next, the analysis of SWOT come out with critical strategies that must be
evaluations shows that AirAsia has to apply few strategies which linked with
1. INTRODUCTION
Airasia, in 2001 sold to Tune Air Sdn Bhd for RM1, started from two
ageing aircraft and accumulated debt of RM40millions (Lim et al, 2009) has
become the world’s best low cost airline. In 2016, AirAsia Berhad (AirAsia) is
being awarded World’s Best Low-Cost Airline in Skytrax World Airline Awards
million of the number of passengers carried (The Star, 2017). AirAsia flies to
total of 109 destinations. In 2016, their net profit has jumped 3.7 times to
RM2.04 billion from RM541.28 million when compared to 2015. The market
respectively.
Firefly, Jetstar, Tigerair, Berjaya Air are among the competitors that
compete over Airasia as the range of low-cost carrier (LCC). However, Airasia
stands out as the largest airline in Malaysia by fleet size, total of destinations
and dominant choice of LCC among its opponents by the total passengers
2016).
PESTEL and Porter’s Five Forces. Internal analysis done VRIO analysis, and
2. MACRO-ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
2.1. PESTEL
a) Political Factors
airline when they broaden the restriction in migration and encourage national
incoming tourists by waive the temporary visa fees. (AirAsia Berhad, Annual
Report 2016). While Malaysia’s government has increased 83% of airport tax
in domestic flights and 56% increase for international flights at KLIA2 which
b) Economical Factors
to a minimum in order to reserve the quota for the changes of fuel price
(Merkert, 2015). Expand market in airline industry will commit to the increase
in GDP. For example, India has increased from 6.6% to 7.6% from 2013 to
dollar since pass few years has caused customers choose to travel to ASEAN
Report 2016).
c) Social-Cultural Factor
than 50% of world residents live within a six-hour flying journey from Kuala
d) Technological Factor
and ease consumers to use the system which prove to contribute extra
are being developed and implemented (United States GAO, 2015). Besides
that, to achieve environment friendly, Airbus 320 aircraft built with ‘sharklet
wing tips’ are used to lower wind drag which help for preferable fuel
e) Environmental/Ecological Factors
between airports and airlines as this can assist to minimize overall airport
expenditure (Yashodha, 2012). Airline industry has very concern about energy
2014 and viral diseases such as SARS, MERS have affected the operation of
f) Legal Factors
related regulations and restrictions have the main impacts to them (Teresa,
Report, 2016).
2011 to 117000 peoples in 2017 are required in India aviation industry (Centre
for Aviation, 2017). On the other hand, it is not an easy to get an aircraft
conditions in order to standardize and control the safety level of each airline
industries. Therefore, the threat for new entrants to airlines industries is low.
There is high demand for affordable flight but there is also high
consistently and expanding route network. This has changed the bargaining
power of buyers from low to moderate (Yashodha, 2012). Besides that, the
switching costs are low in airlines industries. This is because the brand is not
a major consideration to buyers; they will compare the lowest fares among the
airline (Yashodha, 2012). Various airlines are competing between the similar
companies by buyers can be done through websites like Expedia and Cheap
Airbus (Yashodha, 2012). There are also limited fuel suppliers in today’s
market and still ned to relay on jet fuel (Dhamija, 2006). The other supplier
such as food supplier will supply base on the market condition, they can not
increase the price as it will affect the long term business cooperation. Besides
that, the switching cost is high because the supply of aircrafts, fuel and
d) Threat of Substitutes
However, in terms of time and convenience, the planes are the fastest among
all and might surpass all transportation services. Consumers may opt for rail
than bus services when travelling between Malaysia and Singapore which
offered lower fares and aware of the environmental impact of using air travel.
According to Centre for Aviation, it shows the top 5 fleet of airlines in Asia
Pacific from 2013 to 2016 are all from LCCs (Centre of Aviation,2015).
Furthermore, because of high exit barriers, LCCs are forced to expand their
business with providing services like hotel booking, cabs and other package
3. INTERNAL ANALYSIS
3.1. VRIO
Competitive Competitive
Yes No No Yes
Airfare parity
Company Sustained
Branding and Yes Yes Yes Yes Competitive
Image advantage
for low fuel price, cost savings from single aircraft operations, fuel and energy
parity.
like group fleet size of 174 Airbus-A320 in 2016 and owns subsidiaries in
Report 2016).
on fuel and energy consumption which leads Airasia to the World’s Best Low
Cost Airline awarded by Skytrax World Airline. The way of their management
is rare but still can easily imitate by competitors which lead temporary
Airasia has been very creative in creating their own company branding
and images which successfully influenced their consumers. With their famous
slogan “Now Everyone Can Fly” and “Free Ticket” campaign, they have
implant an oppose image of flying with aircraft which is very expensive and
they have been very focus in marketing their brands through all social medias
4. CRITICAL EVALUATION
4.1. SWOT
A,2010).
(Idris, A.N,2017).
(Airfeets.net,2017).
Internal: 1. Air Asia does not have its own maintenance, repair and
Opportunities
Report 2016).
External:
Threats
1. Increasing of transmissible diseases affecting travelers’
analysis.
The strength of AirAsia is that they are able to provide low cost
airfares by reducing management and operation cost. They make good used
website which helps in reducing labour cost. This has been their trademark of
the company. Airasia has cooperated with Shin Corporation, the largest
In the contrary, the major weakness of AirAsia is they are too relying
on online sales as there will be a risk of system disruption. This would result
that, AirAsia does not have their own maintenance, repair and overhaul facility
(MBO) which will cause the lack of ability to handle emergency cases and
many countries have use their own way to promote and provide special
started from 2015, has provided an opportunity for them to build a strong
Lastly, the fluctuation of fuel price and currencies would be the threat
for AirAsia. The unpredictable rates of airport taxes and landing charges are
beyond the company’s control. The customer’s perspective might affect the
image of LCC airlines which think that it may be poorly maintained to keep the
5. ANSOFF
Table 3: ANSOFF
Market Penetration
the flight frequencies to South Korea as they targeted 80% load factor in the
first 12 months to meet the anticipated robust market demand (Nikkei Market,
2017). Besides that, AirAsia decided to rise to 18 weekly flights from Kuala
Lumpur to Seoul from the current 14. Besides that, AirAsia also announced
the flight frequency from Trichy and Kochi will increase from 11 times to 14
times a week. The flight service from Kuala Lumpur to Balikpapan has
Market Development
and India (Yoshodha, 2012). Besides that, AirAsia Malaysia introduced new
(Liu,2017). From this, we can see that AirAsia has strong intention to continue
expansion.
Product Development
One of the vision of AirAsia is to turn into digital airline by investing BIG
Duty Free, BIG Pay, Rokki Wifi and various digital services. The expected
increase income from RM46 to RM60 per passenger. Moreover, they also
keep improving their website by helping to save the last search for the ease of
Diversification
AirAsia also invests for other fields business such as T&CO Coffee, one
they are able to supply good coffees and also earned extra profits from the
coffee retail shops (Gho,2017). Furthermore, the joint ventures with SATS
company from Singapore who provide ground handling and in-flight catering
services has helped AirAsia to save cost and produce additional profits.
STARS
QUESTION MARKS
KL to Penang
KL to Gold Coast
KL to Johor Bahru
KL to Singapore KL to London
STARS
The star is diametrically opposite the dog as it shows the high market
share with high growth market. It makes maximum profit and comprise strong
branding and marketing. The domestic flight route from KL to Penang and JB
has 98% sold out rate. AirAsia produced 90% of high profit margin. For
QUESTION MARKS
Question Marks presents the high growth in market but having low
market shares. It has potential to become stars if the company has sufficient
funds to invest and advertise on the particular routes or else it will fail and
provides the cheap options than flying a long haul flight to European
Cash Cow
Cash Cow will be high market shares but with no growth or little growth.
In this case, AirAsia should not focus on advertising but on the retention on
customers. For example, the flight route from KL to Singapore, the growth is
slugging but the demand is aggressive. In cash cow, this route has great
DOGS
Dogs considered as low market shares and growth. It will become high
in liabilities as company need more money to support it. For example, the
flight route from KL to London. Consumers rather choose for better services
flight company than go for low cost due to the long haul journey to London.
Due to this reason, AirAsia has stopped this route from January 2012.
7.1 Suitability
high demand and tentatively growth of load factor in 2016. This can reduce
the competitive intention, at the same time help on the economical growth
and maintain their position as market leader in low cost airline industry.
7.2 Acceptability
and increased in net profit from RM83 millions in 2014 to RM541 millions
reduce their total debt from RM 12.61 billions in 2015 to RM10.58 billion in
2016 with their high net profit (AirAsia Annual Report 2016).
workforce from 650 to 1050 peoples and will increase from 8 planes to 14
planes by October hold a certain risk because of their small market share
stakeholders with the rising of stock price at RM3.25 in August 2016 from
Tran Trong Kien and Hai Au Aviation to establish a LCC in Vietnam which
7.3 Feasibility
RM1.74 billion in 2016. Besides that, their total debt has dropped from
7.4 Sustainability
AirAsia has been voted as the world’ best LCC for subsequently 9
8. CONCLUSIONS
and air passengers has grown as the increasing demand for airline
of buyers but high bargaining power from supplier and moderately high
threat of substitutes.
satisfaction and reliance are low. Besides that, they have been too relay on
online sales which might be the threat for them when the system disruption
advantage.
the routes to more destinations so that can reach to more customers. Product
customer usage and market development to other countries can promote the
branding name. Through BCG matrices can be concluded that AirAsia need to
focus more on cash cow development and try to improve or eliminate dogs to
strategy as market leader has to be made and evaluate time by time in order
9. RECOMMENDATIONS
through few perspectives. Air Asia can build up their own MRO facilities
and maintenance teams for repair and service airplanes. Besides that, on
financial perspective, AirAsia has to ensure that they are able to achieve
the following years. AirAsia should work out to reduce the increasing rate
to be aware of the internet system failures that would seriously effect the
failure.
cooperation with China and India, AirAsia should plan to expand their flight
brand name as low cost leading airlines so that it helps to overcome the
risk of potential newcomers and raise the market share in future. This can
relationships with them for branding images purpose. Lastly, AirAsia can
strive into educations fields by provide education funding and build training
10. REFERENCES
<https://www.airasia.com/iwov-resources/my/common/pdf/AirAsia/IR/annual-
<https://www.airasia.com/cdn/docs/common-docs/investor-relations/airasia-
Brown, A., Gogzheyan, R., Huwei, G., Meininger, M., Riedel, J., and Ryan, C.
<http://www.burnsmcd.com/insightsnews/insights/aviation-special-
Centre for Aviation, CAPA (2016) CAPA India Aviation Outlook 2017/18:
aviation-outlook-201718-surging-traffic-but-infrastructure-constraints-become-
<http://akdhamija.webs.com/consultancy/Porter%20Airline%20Industry1.pdf>
[4 October 2017]
Hunter, M. (2016) ‘Is it time for Air Asia to reinvent itself?’. ASEAN
<http://asiancorrespondent.com/2016/03/is-it-time-for-air-asia-to-reinvent-
Idris, A. N. (2017) ‘AirAsia sees 2017 results surpassing that of 2016 despite
lower profit in 1Q’, The Edge Markets, [online] 25 May. available from <
http://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/airasia-sees-2017-results-surpassing-
http://www.reuters.com/article/airasiax-results/update-1-malaysias-airasia-x-
2017]
MalayMail Online (2016) ‘AirAsia promises to appeal if new airport tax same
<http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/airasia-promises-to-
appeal-if-new-airport-tax-same-for-klia2#UJ1eqTcwK3u2PM7W.97> [4
October 2017]
Merkert, R. (2015), ‘Explainer: fuel hedging and its impact on airlines and
<http://theconversation.com/exlainer-fuel-hedging-and-its-impact-on-airlines-
downfall, union claims’, Malaymail Online, [online] 16 June. available from <
http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/government-bias-
towards-airasia-caused-mas-downfall-union-claims#BzRLflc2yjyHsbWR.97>
United States Government Accountability Office, GAO (2015) Air Travel and
2017]
<http://www.sustainalytics.com/sites/default/files/airlines_in_asia-
Yashodha, Y. (2012) ‘Air Asia Berhad: Strategic analysis of a leading low cost
<http://www.elixirpublishers.com/articles/1351762459_51%20(2012)%201116
2017]
2017]
<http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2017/01/09/airasia-increases-flight-
Frequencies For Aidiladha Travel Period". New Strait Times [online] available
from <https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2017/07/256990/airasia-offering-
Liu, J. (2017) Airasia Group Schedules New Domestic Routes In S17 [online]
available from
<http://www.routesonline.com/news/38/airlineroute/271506/airasia-group-
<https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2017/10/26/airasia-to-
explore-new-routes-in-china-with-purchase-of-new-aircraft/> [3 November
2017]
<http://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/airasia-acquires-80-stake-tco-coffee-
<https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2017/10/30/airasia-
https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Companies/AirAsia-X-to-increase-flights-to-
standard.com/article/companies/airasia-to-increase-flight-frequency-
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/08/19/airasia-increase-kl-
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/transportation/airlines-/aviation/
airasia-india-scales-up-workforce-by-over-50-per-
https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2017/03/31/airasia-sets-
2017].